DOCSLIB.ORG

Cannabis Legalization and the 14 Ps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cannabis Legalization and the 14 Ps The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Encompassing All Addictive Disorders ISSN: 0095-2990 (Print) 1097-9891 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iada20 How will cannabis legalization affect health, safety, and social equity outcomes? It largely depends on the 14 Ps Beau Kilmer To cite this article: Beau Kilmer (2019): How will cannabis legalization affect health, safety, and social equity outcomes? It largely depends on the 14 Ps, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1611841 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2019.1611841 Published online: 02 Jul 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 173 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iada20 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2019.1611841 REVIEW How will cannabis legalization affect health, safety, and social equity outcomes? It largely depends on the 14 Ps Beau Kilmer RAND Drug Policy Research Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Jurisdictions considering or implementing alternatives to cannabis supply prohibition will con- Received 16 December 2018 front several decisions that will influence health, safety, and social equity outcomes. This essay Revised 18 April 2019 highlights 14 of these design considerations, which all conveniently begin with the letter P:1) Accepted 23 April 2019 Production, 2) Profit motive, 3) Power to regulate, 4) Promotion, 5) Prevention and treatment, 6) KEYWORDS Policing and enforcement, 7) Penalties, 8) Prior criminal records, 9) Product types, 10) Potency, 11) Cannabis; legalization; Purity, 12) Price, 13) Preferences for licenses, and 14) Permanency. For each factor, the paper health; safety; social equity explains why it is important, describes the various approaches, and highlights how some of the jurisdictions that have legalized have addressed these choices. The primary audiences are decision makers considering alternatives to prohibiting cannabis supply and analysts making projections or conducting evaluations of these changes. Introduction what are the various approaches, and highlight how some of the jurisdictions that have legalized have Canada, Uruguay, and 11 jurisdictions in the United addressed these choices. States have removed the prohibition on cannabis and have legalized supply for adults. This is very different “ from the more common approach known as decrimi- Production nalization” which typically removes the criminal penal- ties for possessing small amounts but keeps supply The cost of producing cannabis will plummet with a criminal offense. Many of these jurisdictions allow legalization (7). Removing the prohibition means large-scale production and retail sales, but this is not producers no longer need to hide or be compensated the only way to legalize cannabis. Those considering or for their risk of arrest or incarceration (8). These implementing alternatives to cannabis supply prohibi- costs will further decline if governments allow pro- tion will confront several decisions that will influence ducers to compete and grow on industrial-sized out- health, safety, and social equity outcomes. door farms (9). We see price declines happening now This essay highlights 14 of these design considerations inColoradowheretheaveragepriceforapoundof which all conveniently begin with the letter P.Itbuildson high-potency cannabis in the licensed wholesale mar- previous efforts to highlight the various supply architec- ket declined more than 60% from January 2015 to tures and regulatory decisions surrounding cannabis lega- October 2018, from $2007 to $759 (10). Some suggest lization (e.g., 1,2,3,4), and two publications using a similar the wholesale price drop in Oregon has been even alliterative framework (5,6). The primary audiences are more severe (e.g., 11). decision makers considering alternatives to prohibiting How quickly the wholesale prices decline will cannabis supply and analysts making projections or con- depend on how much cannabis is allowed to be pro- ducting evaluations of these changes. duced and the regulations imposed on producers. Jurisdictions could be strategic and control the amount of cannabis (or THC) produced, or they could simply The 14 Ps give production licenses to anyone who applies and passes a background check. This not only has implica- For each decision, the paper will generally follow tions for what happens to the size of the illicit market, a similar structure: Why is this an important factor, but also for the economic opportunities in the licit CONTACT Beau Kilmer [email protected] RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA 94607 This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article. © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2 B. KILMER market. If licensed growers make a serious investment Profit motive to grow in the licit market and the wholesale prices Jurisdictions considering legalization need to decide collapse, some of the producers – especially the smaller whether to allow profit-maximizing firms to enter the ones – may find it unprofitable to operate. Indeed, market. It is unclear how legalization will play out and some may go bankrupt and end up worse off than if allowing business and their lobbyists to gain power will they had not entered the cannabis business in the first make it more difficult to make course corrections as the place. There is already anecdotal evidence of this hap- industry develops. Allowing innovative firms will lead pening in Washington, where license values are drop- ping and it is estimated that only about half of the to a proliferation of new products which could improve licensed canopy allocation for production is being consumer welfare over other more restrictive models. ’ used (12). On the other hand, Pareto s Law is in effect when it Initially, Uruguay limited its two licensed produ- comes to cannabis: It is the daily and near-daily canna- cers to grow no more than 4 metric tons, but this bis users which account for about 20% of past year approach is not the norm. Except for Washington, users and about 80% of expenditures (15). To be profit- none of the US states allowing commercial production able, most firms will need to maintain and encourage set a cap on the total amount of cannabis (or THC) heavy use which could have serious implications for that can be produced and sold in the licit market. rates of cannabis use disorder and other public health (Washington initially limited production to 2 million outcomes (16). square feet of canopy, but this cap was eventually Much of the cannabis debate in the US is focused on “ lifted and now it is reported that the state now a false dichotomy of keeping supply prohibited or reg- ” licensed more than 12 million square feet; but as ulating cannabis like alcohol. Figure 1 displays several noted, not all of it is being used.) Canada has licensed alternatives to status quo supply prohibition, showing more than 120 producers for its non-medical market that there are many middle-ground options jurisdic- and has not formally limited production (13); how- tions could pursue, ranging from home production to ever, their model allows each province and territory to government monopoly to allowing socially responsible control the wholesale and retail markets which, in businesses that do not exclusively focus on profit (3,17). essence, gives each government the power to control Cautious jurisdictions may want to consider some of how much can be sold at the retail level and at what these other approaches before embracing the commer- price (14). cial, profit-maximization model. It is also the case that So far, jurisdictions allowing non-medical retail jurisdictions could choose different options for differ- cannabis sales limit production to domestic sources. ent market levels (e.g., for-profit production and state- If this changes and importation of cannabis produced controlled retail stores; also see 18). in other countries is allowed, this will accelerate the While most of the jurisdictions in the US have gone price decline and dramatically change the cannabis- the commercial route, both Vermont and Washington, related economic opportunities in the importing and DC have limited supply to home grows and gifting. exporting countries. Canada’s new model is a hybrid where the federal Figure 1. Twelve alternatives to status quo prohibition of cannabis supply. Source: Caulkins and Kilmer (17) THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 3 government licenses producers (most are for profit and and as discussed earlier, most profit-maximizing firms some are publicly traded), and the provincial govern- will focus on creating and nurturing heavy users. While ments serve as the sole wholesaler, allowing the state to an advantage of the state monopoly approach is that the control products and prices if it wishes. Some provinces government can control advertising, that does not are also limiting retail sales to government-run stores. mean it will. In the US, many government agencies Outside of the home-grow only models, Uruguay heavily market state-sponsored lotteries to boost reven- has imposed the most restrictive legalization model to ues (26), and the Liquor Control Board of Ontario – date: Adults must register with the government to one of the world’s largest buyers and suppliers of alco- obtain legal cannabis and must choose from one of hol –“is widely regarded as the leader in liquor retail- three supply options: produce at home; join ing and marketing” (27). a cannabis co-op, or purchase from participating phar- Jurisdictions have to choose whether they want to macies (19–21). Only two firms are permitted to pro- allow advertising, and if so, which kinds. Uruguay has duce cannabis for the pharmacies and the state banned all advertising while US states allow it. Indeed, determines the price and product availability.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pioneering the Future of Global Cannabis June 2020
    Pioneering the Future of Global Cannabis June 2020 ©2020 TILRAY Disclaimer Investors and prospective investors should rely only on the information contained in the continuous expected; that adverse changes or developments affecting the Company’s main or planned facilities may Although management has attempted to identify important risk factors that could cause actual results to disclosure filings (the “Filings”) of Tilray Inc. (the “Company”). This presentation is qualified in its entirety have an adverse effect on the Company; that the medical cannabis industry and market may not continue differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking information in this presentation, there may by reference to, and must be read in conjunction with, the information contained in the Filings. An investor to exist or develop as anticipated or the Company may not be able to succeed in this market; that the be other risk factors not presently known to the Company or that the Company presently believes are not or prospective investor is not entitled to rely on parts of the information contained in this presentation to Company has a limited operating history and a history of net losses and that it may not achieve or maintain material that could also cause actual results or future events to differ materially from those expressed in the exclusion of others, and the Company is not authorized to provide different or additional information. profitability in the future; risks related to the Company’s current or proposed international operations; risks such forward-looking information in this presentation. There can be no assurance that such information Unless otherwise specified, all monetary amounts in this presentation are in United States dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • In Focus Cannabis Legalization 4
    IN FOCUS CANNABIS LEGALIZATION 4 2020 Developments in jurisdictions with measures regulating the non-medical use of cannabis of cannabis products for medical purposes had DEVELOPMENTS IN already been allowed in Canada as early as 1999. JURISDICTIONS WITH The objectives of the current cannabis legislation in MEASURES REGULATING Canada are to keep cannabis away from young people (under 18 years of age), to prevent criminals THE NON-MEDICAL USE from profiting from the distribution and sale of can- OF CANNABIS nabis and to safeguard public health and safety by allowing adults (aged 18 and older) legal access to As at December 2019, legal provisions had been cannabis.322 Under the constitutional division of approved in Canada, Uruguay and in 11 jurisdic- powers in Canada, the federal Government and pro- tions in the United States, including the District of vincial governments have different responsibilities.323 Columbia and the Northern Mariana Islands, to As the provinces historically developed their own allow the production and sale of cannabis products systems to regulate the sale of alcohol, a similar for non-medical use. The common feature of the approach has been applied to regulate the non-med- legislation in Canada and in the jurisdictions in the ical use of cannabis products. United States is that most of them allow for-profit To monitor the outcome of the new cannabis reg- industry to produce and sell cannabis products for ulations, the Government of Canada has invested non-medical use. There are some differences in the in a formal system that may eventually help to eval- level of regulation, its implementation and the con- uate their impact and support the further trol of the non-medical use of cannabis (see tables development of policies and programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Round Table: Legalized Marijuana
    ROUND TABLE Legalized Marijuana June 5 2018 Table of Contents Opening Letter…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….pg 2 Cannabis Legalization (official release from the Government of Ontario)……………………………..pg 3 Scripture Used to Support Marijuana Use…………………………………………………………………………….pg 7 Scripture Used to Oppose Marijuana Use…………………………………………………………………………….pg 9 The Medical Side of Things………………………………………………………………………………………………..pg 11 When Pot is Legal, What Do We Say?.................................................................................................pg 16 Can Cannabis and Christ Co-exist?.......................................................................................................pg 20 Marijuana to the Glory of God?.............................................................................................................pg 25 Questions to Wrestle Through…………………………………………………………………………………………..pg 29 1 219 Talbot St E Leamington ON N8H 3V6 Tel: 519.326.3605 www.meadowbrook.ca Hello everyone! On Tuesday, June 5th 2018 at 7pm, we will be having a round-table discussion about the legalization of marijuana, which is coming to Canada soon. How do we grapple with this and approach it as Christians, as parents, as a church? We wanted to take some time to get together and talk about the issue. We are not gathering on this night to argue, or to craft an official policy, or to solve the matter once and for all. This will be an ongoing conversation for all of us, requiring prayer and careful thought, and it is likely not going to be
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol, Cannabis and Impaired Driving
    ALCOHOL, CANNABIS AND IMPAIRED DRIVING July 11, 2018 R. Solomon, Distinguished University Professor, Faculty of Law, Western University; K. Mahdi, J.D. 2020, Faculty of Law, Western University; & A. Sohrevardi, J.D. 2020, Faculty of Law, Western University TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 ALCOHOL ............................................................................................................... 7 PART I: ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION .......................................................................... 7 Section 1: Global ................................................................................................................. 7 Section 2: Alcohol Consumption in Canada .................................................................... 8 (a) Background Information ......................................................................................... 8 (b) Rates and Patterns of Alcohol Consumption ......................................................... 10 PART II: IMPAIRED DRIVING IN CANADA ............................................................... 15 Section 1: Rates of Driving After Alcohol Consumption ................................................ 15 Section 2: Impaired Driving Crashes ............................................................................... 17 (a) A Note on the Impaired Driving Crash Data ......................................................... 17 (b) Alcohol-Related Crash Deaths and
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Use of Marijuana Cases
    Summaries of Religious Use of Marijuana Cases Alabama regulate was conceivable, only that none had Rheuark v. State (1992) 601 So.2d 135 been proposed. Statutes prohibiting possession of marijuana and controlled substances did not violate freedom of California: religion rights of defendant claiming that he People v. Mullins (1975) 50 Cal. App 3d 61 worshipped plants as gods and used marijuana Facts: A deputy sheriff had gone to defendant's and psilocybin as religious practice. premises at night at the invitation of a man who Court compared Defendant’s argument to a past lived in a teepee on the property and who had told ruling on polygamy and quoting the cases the officer there were marijuana plants growing Reynolds v. United State 98 U.S. 145 and there. The officer took two plants as samples to Cleveland v. United States 329 U.S. 14 which in be tested and, three days later, went back to the sum says that morality is defined by statute and property with a search warrant. Defendant's Congress and not the individual’s perceptions of property is not enclosed or surrounded by a morality. Therefore because the possession of fence. From Ten Mile Creek Road there is a marijuana is unlawful, it doesn’t matter that the driveway that leads onto defendant's property. Defendant used it for religious use. There is no gate at the entrance to the property. At the entrance there is a sign reading “Universal Arizona: Life Church of Christ Light.” Defendant's wife People v. Hardesty (2009) 214 P.3d 1004 testified that on and prior to May 30, 1972, there FACTS: Hardesty was driving his van at night was a “no trespassing” sign at the entrance to the when an officer stopped him because one property; that a church known as “Universal Life headlight was out.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis in Canada: What the Upcoming Legalization of One of Canada’S Most Popular Drugs Means for Young People Braedon R
    LETTER Cannabis in Canada: What the upcoming legalization of one of Canada’s most popular drugs means for young people Braedon R. Paul1 Citation: UBCMJ. 2018: 9.2 (40-41) ith the Canadian legalization and regulation of cannabis slated term, some have shown residual effects lasting well beyond abstinence Wfor a debut no later than July 2018,1 many Canadians are eagerly of cannabis use,14 particularly if chronic and heavy use was initiated in awaiting the day when one of Canada’s most popular drugs2,3 can be earlier adolescence. Additionally, chronic use of smoked cannabis has legally purchased and consumed for recreational purposes. Bill C-45 been associated with symptoms of chronic bronchitis and large airway [the Cannabis Act], introduced to the House of Commons in early inflammation, while the links between smoking cannabis and lung 2017,4 is set to legalize and regulate the production, distribution, and cancer have been suggested by some but not conclusively determined.15 sale of recreational cannabis across Canada, fulfilling an election If the age limit is set too high, however, illicit sales from organized promise made by the Liberal Party of Canada [LPOC] in 2015.5 crime groups, which currently reap an estimated $7 billion annually Although many are in favour of the incoming legislation, an equally in Canada alone,16 will continue to supply the underage market—a vocal group has expressed concern over its pitfalls, particularly those substantial concern given that Canadian youth are understood to be regarding the potential impacts on Canadian youth. Given what is the highest young users of cannabis in the world3 and are more than currently understood about the effects of cannabis usage on adolescent double that of the general Canadian population.2 Inevitably, such high health, these concerns are not unwarranted.
    [Show full text]
  • Americas Increasingly Being Used in Maritime Drug Trafficking
    E/INCB/2000/1 prevent the diversion of pharmaceuticals containing Organization of American States. At present, few narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, as well as regions have such a mechanism. chemicals, into illicit channels. At the same time, steps 231. It is hoped that the Multilateral Evaluation must be taken to ensure that essential narcotic drugs Mechanism will soon become an effective instrument and psychotropic substances are made available to for monitoring the progress of the individual and those who need them for medical purposes. collective efforts of Governments to combat illicit 227. The Board notes that there is a proposal to trafficking in and abuse of drugs. designate the port of Zanzibar as a “free port”. Given that the coastline of the United Republic of Tanzania is part of a key drug trafficking route, the Board stresses Central America and the Caribbean that measures to suppress illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursor Major developments chemicals in such “free ports” should be no less 232. Drug traffickers continue to take advantage of the stringent than those applied in other parts of the fact that the region of Central America and the country, as required under article 18 of the Caribbean is located between major drug-producing 1988 Convention. areas and significant illicit drug markets, that the 228. The Board has reviewed the follow-up by the Caribbean is comprised of hundreds of relatively small Government of Togo to the recommendations made by islands with myriads of cays and that the socio- the Board after its mission to that country in economic situation in most of the countries in the June 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • From the US Fentanyl Boom to the Mexican Opium Crisis
    Grandmaison, RL, et al. 2019. The Last Harvest? From the US Fentanyl Boom to the Mexican Opium Crisis. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1(3): pp. 312–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.45 RESEARCH The Last Harvest? From the US Fentanyl Boom to the Mexican Opium Crisis Romain Le Cour Grandmaison1, Nathaniel Morris2 and Benjamin Smith3 1 Paris-1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, FR 2 UCL, GB 3 University of Warwick, GB Corresponding author: Nathaniel Morris ([email protected]) For decades, farmers in the most marginalised regions of Mexico have depended for survival on the illicit cultivation of opium poppy for the US heroin market. In 2017 they could earn up to 20,000 pesos ($950–$1,050 dollars) per kilo of opium, which channelled around 19 billion pesos ($1 billion dollars) into the country’s poorest communities, sustaining regional economies, religious ceremonies, and intra-community relations while stemming out-migration to Mexican cities and the US. With the recent upsurge in fentanyl use in the US, however, the demand for Mexican heroin has fallen sharply, meaning that farmers are now being paid around 6000 to 8000 pesos ($315–415 dollars) per kilo of raw opium. Thus the total money being paid to opium producing villages has dropped to an unprecedented low of 7 billion pesos ($370 million dollars). Drawing on fieldwork conducted in two poppy-producing regions of Mexico – one in the State of Nayarit, one in the State of Guerrero – this article shows that today, farmers cannot make a profit from opium once fertilizers and other capital inputs have been taken into account; village economies are starting to dry up; and out-migration is on the up.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the Costs of Cannabis in Canada How the Federal and Provincial Governments Should Split Cannabis Tax Revenues by ERICH HARTMANN
    MOWAT RESEARCH #169 | AUGUST 2018 Sharing the Costs of Cannabis in Canada How the federal and provincial governments should split cannabis tax revenues BY ERICH HARTMANN MUNK SCHOOL OF GLOBAL AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Colin Busby, Luan Ngo and Adrienne Davidson for their valuable feedback on this report. The author would also like to thank Elaine Stam for her design work on this report as well as Reuven Shlozberg, Sunil Johal, and Andrew Parkin for their helpful contributions. All content and any remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the author. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of any other organization or agency. Author ERICH HARTMANN Practice Lead, Intergovernmental Affairs Erich Hartmann is the Mowat Centre’s Practice Lead for Intergovernmental Affairs. Erich has a deep knowledge of intergovernmental affairs and federal fiscal issues. Previously, Erich spent 13 years in the Ontario Public Service at the Ministry of Finance in a number of policy and management roles, most recently serving as Manager of Federal-Provincial Relations. Erich holds an MPA and a BA (Hons) from Queen’s University. MOWATCENTRE.CA @MOWATCENTRE 439 UNIVERSITY AVENUE The Mowat Centre is an independent public policy think tank SUITE 2200, TORONTO, ON located at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at M5G 1Y8 CANADA the University of Toronto. The Mowat Centre is Ontario’s non-partisan, evidence-based voice on public policy. It undertakes collaborative applied policy research, proposes innovative research-driven recommendations, and engages in public dialogue on Canada’s most important national issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Industry and Edibles
    CANNABIS INDUSTRY AND EDIBLES LABOUR MARKET REPORT ABOUT US Food Processing Skills Canada (FPSC) is the food and beverage manufacturing industry’s workforce development organization. As a non-profit, located in Ottawa with representatives across Canada, we support food and beverage manufacturing businesses from coast to coast in developing skilled and professional employees and workplace environments. Our work directly and positively impacts industry talent attraction, workforce retention and employment culture. We care about assisting the industry in finding, training and retaining the very best people for the job. Through our partnerships with industry, associations, educators and all levels of This project was funded by the Government of Canada’s Sectoral Initiatives Program. governments in Canada, FPSC has developed exceptional resources for The opinions and interpretations in this publication are those of the author and do not the sector including the Food Skills Library™, Canadian Food Processors necessarily reflect those of the Government of Canada. Institute™, FoodCert™ and Labour Market Information Reports. ISBN 978-1-989541-56-2 Copyright © 2020 Food Processing Skills Canada All rights reserved. The use of any part of this publication, whether it is reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (including electronic, mechanical, photographic, photocopying or recording), without the prior written permission of the Food Processing Skills Canada is an infringement of copyright law. Food Processing
    [Show full text]
  • Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers
    ACOEM GUIDELINES Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Jennan A. Phillips, PhD, MSN, RN, Michael G. Holland, MD, Debra D. Baldwin, NP-C, PhD, Linda Gifford Meuleveld, RN, COHN-S, CCM, CPDM, Kathryn L. Mueller, MD, MPH, Brett Perkison, MD, MPH, Mark Upfal, MD, MPH, and Marianne Dreger, MA arijuana (cannabis) is the most fre- tions require an assessment of the safety of adequate study. Other articles are also cited M quently used illicit drug of abuse in marijuana use by the American workforce. when appropriate to clarify issues that may the United States and worldwide. Moreover, Although studies have suggested that mari- not have been addressed by studies qualify- it is second only to alcohol as the most preva- juana may be used with reasonable safety in ing as evidence. lent psychoactive substance seen in cases of some controlled environments, there are po- 1,2 driving under the influence of drugs. It is tential workplace consequences involved in LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF also by a wide margin, the drug most of- its use that warrant scrutiny and concern. ten detected in workplace drug-testing pro- The potential consequences of mari- MARIJUANA LEGISLATION grams. The primary psychoactive substance juana use in the workplace include the risk In late 2009, the US Department of in marijuana is delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, and associated cost of adverse events and Justice initiated a change in marijuana en- known simply as THC.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil-Canada Comparative Law Cannabis Market
    BRAZIL-CANADA COMPARATIVE LAW CANNABIS MARKET REGULATION ARTICLE 9 Updated on August 2019. 1 Introduction The growth of the cannabis market is one of the trends on the in this regard. In May 2017, cannabis sativa was included in the category world scenario nowadays. Whether in the form of medicines, food of “medicinal plant” in the list of Brazilian common names. and cosmetics, or even recreational use of plant substances, all forms of exploration are seen as promising for years to come. The In the following pages, attorneys Affonso Barros da Cunha and Marcos topic has come into global discussion and several countries are Eduardo Lagrotta Pregnolato, from Tavaris Novis, and Sandra Gogal, positioning themselves. from Miller Thomson, will explain the regulatory situation of cannabis in Brazil and Canada, respectively, and the future prospects for advancing Since 2018, Canada has allowed recreational use of cannabis for this market in their countries. adults, in addition to authorizations for the production and marketing of herbal medicines. Authorization for edible products and extracts is scheduled for October 2019. With this, the country has created a legal and regulatory framework to control the entire cannabis production, distribution, sale and possession chain within its territory, taking a significant step towards exploration of this global market. Brazil is still in the middle of a great discussion on the subject, with advances in the medical area. Individual authorization for the importation of medicinal products with substances extracted from the plant for personal and prescription use began a little over a decade ago and in 2017 the registration of one of these medicines was allowed for the first time in the country.
    [Show full text]