DOCSLIB.ORG

Catálogo De Malezas De México: Familia Brassicaceae (Cruciferae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catálogo De Malezas De México: Familia Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) i Catálogo de Malezas de México: Familia Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) Sonia Rojas Heike Vibrans ii Contenido Introducción ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introducción a la familia Brassicaceae ....................................................................................................... 2 Método ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Selección de las especies para el catálogo ................................................................................................. 4 Géneros excluidos por no tener especies de malezas .............................................................................. 5 Especies consideradas .................................................................................................................................. 6 Especies excluidas ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Contenido de las fichas del catálogo ........................................................................................................ 17 El catálogo ........................................................................................................................................................ 18 Barbarea verna (Mill.) Asch. ........................................................................................................................ 18 Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. .......................................................................................................................... 20 Brassica napus L. .......................................................................................................................................... 24 Brassica nigra (L.) W.D.J. Koch .................................................................................................................. 28 Brassica oleracea L. ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Brassica rapa L. ............................................................................................................................................. 34 Brassica tournefortii Gouan ......................................................................................................................... 38 Cakile maritima Scop. ................................................................................................................................... 41 Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz ......................................................................................................................... 44 Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. ..............................................................................................................47 Cardamine africana L. ................................................................................................................................... 51 Cardamine flexuosa With. ............................................................................................................................ 54 Cardamine hirsuta L. .....................................................................................................................................57 Cardamine obliqua Hochst. ex A. Rich. ...................................................................................................... 60 Descurainia impatiens (Cham. & Schltdl.) O.E. Schulz ............................................................................ 63 Descurainia incisa (Engelm. ex A. Gray) Britton ...................................................................................... 66 Descurainia pinnata (Walter) Britton ......................................................................................................... 69 Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb ex Prantl ......................................................................................................72 Descurainia streptocarpa (Fourn.) O. E. Schulz ......................................................................................... 75 Descurainia virletii (E. Fourn.) O. E. Schulz ............................................................................................. 78 Diplotaxis muralis (L.) DC. .......................................................................................................................... 81 Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) CD. ....................................................................................................................... 85 iii Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz ................................................................................................. 88 Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav. .............................................................................................................................. 91 Exhalimolobos berlandieri (E. Fourn) Al-Shehbaz & C.D. Bailey ............................................................ 95 Exhalimolobos hispidulus (DC.) Al-Shehbaz & C.D. Bailey ..................................................................... 98 Hirschfeldia incana (L.) Lagr.-Fossat ........................................................................................................ 101 Hornungia procumbens (L.) Hayek ........................................................................................................... 105 Lepidium austrinum Small ......................................................................................................................... 108 Lepidium densiflorum Schrader ................................................................................................................. 111 Lepidium didymum L. ................................................................................................................................. 114 Lepidium draba L. ....................................................................................................................................... 117 Lepidium latifolium L.................................................................................................................................. 120 Lepidium oblongum Small .......................................................................................................................... 123 Lepidium perfoliatum L. .............................................................................................................................. 126 Lepidium schaffneri Thell. .......................................................................................................................... 129 Lepidium sordidum A. Gray ...................................................................................................................... 132 Lepidium virginicum L. .............................................................................................................................. 135 con Lepidium costaricense Thell. y Lepidium gerloffianum Vatke ex Thell. ........................................... 135 Lobularia maritima (L.) Desv. .................................................................................................................... 141 Malcolmia maritima (L.) W.T Aiton ......................................................................................................... 144 Mancoa bracteata (S. Wats.) Rollins ..........................................................................................................147 Matthiola fruticulosa (L.) Maire en Jahand. y Maire .............................................................................. 150 Matthiola incana (L.) W. T. Aiton ............................................................................................................. 153 Nasturtium officinale W.T. Aiton .............................................................................................................. 156 Planodes virginicum (L.) E.L. Greene ....................................................................................................... 159 Raphanus raphanistrum L. ......................................................................................................................... 162 Raphanus sativus L. .................................................................................................................................... 166 Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All. ...................................................................................................................... 169 Rorippa dubia (Persoon) H. Hara ............................................................................................................. 173 Rorippa indica (L.) Hiern ............................................................................................................................176 Rorippa mexicana (Moc., Sessé & Cerv. ex DC.) Standl. & Steyerm. ................................................... 179 Rorippa microtitis (B. L. Rob.) Rollins ...................................................................................................... 182 Rorippa pinnata (Moc. & Sessé) Rollins ................................................................................................... 185 Rorippa teres (Michx.) Stuckey ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List
    5/12/16 State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/ Aquilegia caerulea James (Colorado Blue Columbine) Photo: William Gray List Counts: Wetland AW GP WMVC Total UPL 83 120 101 304 FACU 440 393 430 1263 FAC 333 292 355 980 FACW 342 329 333 1004 OBL 279 285 285 849 Rating 1477 1419 1504 1511 User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps Region. 3) Some state boundaries lie within two or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating will be shown in one column and the other column will be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/22 5/12/16 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. FACU FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Canyon Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides L. UPL UPL FACU Norw ay Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silver Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica L.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Rapistrum Rugosum Bastard Cabbage Family: Brassicaceae (Mustard Family) Duration & Habit: Annual Herb
    RAPISTRUM RUGOSUM BASTARD CABBAGE FAMILY: BRASSICACEAE (MUSTARD FAMILY) DURATION & HABIT: ANNUAL HERB Photographer: Mark Simmons Source: Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center Description: Bastard cabbage is an annual, many-branched, herbaceous plant that grows from 1 to 5 feet or more in height. It has a robust taproot that can become quite large and deep-rooted. Leaves are deep green, lobed and wrinkled, and sometimes have a reddish cast. The terminal lobe is larger than the lateral lobes, especially on the basal leaves. Younger leaves growing higher up on the plant are less lobed and more elongated. Bastard cabbage typically flowers from early spring into summer, bearing clusters of small, showy yellow flowers at the tips of its branches, resembling those of broccoli and cabbage. Bastard cabbage can be identified more easily and certainly by its unusually shaped fruit - a two-segmented seed capsule, called a silique. The seed capsule is stalked, with a long beak at the tip, and contains 1-2 seeds. The seeds are oval-shaped, dark brown, smooth, and tiny (about 1/16-inch). Two subspecies of plant are recognized: R. rugosum ssp. rugosum and R. rugosum ssp. orientale. Bastard cabbage is also known as turnip-weed, common giant mustard, ball mustard, wild turnip, wild rape and tall mustard-weed. Designated a terrestrial noxious-weed seed in Texas. Ecological Threat : Bastard cabbage is an early successional plant that develops a broad, robust mass of basal leaves, which allows it to successfully out-compete native plant species. In some places, it forms a monoculture (a vegetative cover of mostly one species).
    [Show full text]
  • Brassicaceae) in Turkey
    Bangladesh J. Bot. 46(2): 623-629, 2017 (June) POLLEN MORPHOLOGY OF SIX SPECIES PREVIOUSLY PLACED IN MALCOLMIA (BRASSICACEAE) IN TURKEY * 1 2 3 AYLA KAYA , MURAT ÜNAL , FEVZİ ÖZGÖKÇE , BEKİR DOĞAN 4 AND ESRA MARTİN Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Anadolu University, TR-26470 Eskisehir, Turkey. Keywords: Pollen morphology, Malcolmia, Strigosella, Zuvanda, Turkey Abstract The genus Malcolmia R. Br. (Brassicaceae) is taxonomically problematic and some of its species have recently been transferred to the genera Strigosella Boiss. and Zuvanda Dvorak. In this study, pollen morphology of some species of Malcolmia, Strigosella and Zuvanda, previously placed in Malcolmia genus, were examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM), in order to determine the significance of pollen features as taxonomic characters. The results reveal rather uniform morphological features, however fine details are characteristic to distinguishing pollen grains in the species of the genus. The pollen grains in three genera are tricolpate and the surface sculpturing type is reticulate. The basic shape of the pollen grains in species studied is euprolate, subprolate-euprolate and euprolate-perprolate. While pollen grains of S. africana is the smallest in all examined species, M. chia is the biggest. However, three genera can be easily separated by the length of the polar and equatorial axes themselves. Introduction The genus Malcolmia R.Br. is a member of Brassicaceae and it comprises ten species distributed throughout the world (Al-Shehbaz et al. 2006). Malcolmia was previously represented by six species in Turkey (Cullen 1965). In recent studies, two more species belonging to Malcolmia genus have added to the flora of Turkey as new records.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Conservation Alliance®S Alien Plant Working Group
    FACT SHEET: ANNUAL BASTARD-CABBAGE Annual Bastard-Cabbage Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All. Mustard family (Brassicaceae) NATIVE RANGE Central Europe, the Mediterranean, northern Africa and western, temperate Asia DESCRIPTION Annual bastard-cabbage is an annual, many-branched, herbaceous plant that grows from 1 to 5 feet or more in height and has a taproot that can become quite large. Leaves are deep green, lobed and wrinkled, and sometimes have a reddish cast. The terminal lobe is larger than the lateral lobes, especially on the basal leaves. Younger leaves growing higher up on the plant are less lobed and more elongated. Annual bastard-cabbage typically flowers from early spring into summer, bearing clusters of small, showy yellow flowers at the tips of its branches, resembling those of broccoli and cabbage. Annual bastard-cabbage can be identified more easily and certainly by its unusually shaped fruit - a two-segmented seed capsule, called a silique. The seed capsule is stalked, with a long beak at the tip, and contains 1-2 seeds. The seeds are oval-shaped, dark brown, smooth, and tiny (about 1/16-inch). Two subspecies of this plant are recognized: R. rugosum ssp. rugosum and R. rugosum ssp. orientale. Annual bastard cabbage is also known as turnip-weed, common giant mustard, ball mustard, wild turnip, wild rape and tall mustard-weed. It is designated a terrestrial noxious-weed seed in the state of Texas. ECOLOGICAL THREAT Annual bastard-cabbage is an early successional plant that develops a broad, robust mass of basal leaves, which allows it to successfully outcompete native plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Flowering Time in the Tetraploid Capsella Bursa-Pastoris (Brassicaceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 367 Evolution of Flowering Time in the Tetraploid Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae) TANJA SLOTTE ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7024-1 2007 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8311 ! " #$$" $%$$ & & & ' ( ) * ( + )( #$$"( & ! * ) ) ,-( . ( /0"( 1$ ( ( 2+ 3" 4345514"$#14( . 6 & &* & * ( 2 2 & & * * & * & ( ! * & ( . 7 & * . * & & & & & * ( & & * & * 8 & ( ) & & * * ( . 4 4& * && * * && & * ( + * 9) ,9 ) - & & * : ( ) !"!#$% ,%- & 9) &!'$()* &! ,&- * & * ( && & * & * & ; ( ) % & * & && & * ( 2 8 & & * +, - & * 8 9) . / $ / * / $ * / ) %0/ / $ 12345 / , < ) 6 + #$$" 2++ 0540#1 2+ 3" 4345514"$#14 % %%% 4 / , %== (:(= > ? % %%% 4 /- looking carefully, a shepherd’s purse is blooming under the fence Bash List of papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to by their Roman numerals: I Slotte, T., Ceplitis, A., Neuffer, B., Hurka, H., and M. Lascoux. 2006. Intrageneric phylogeny of Capsella (Brassicaceae) and the
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Position and Generic Limits of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae)
    PHYLOGENETIC POSITION Steve L. O'Kane, Jr.2 and Ihsan A. 3 AND GENERIC LIMITS OF Al-Shehbaz ARABIDOPSIS (BRASSICACEAE) BASED ON SEQUENCES OF NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA1 ABSTRACT The primary goals of this study were to assess the generic limits and monophyly of Arabidopsis and to investigate its relationships to related taxa in the family Brassicaceae. Sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS-1 and ITS-2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA, including 5.8S rDNA, were used in maximum parsimony analyses to construct phylogenetic trees. An attempt was made to include all species currently or recently included in Arabidopsis, as well as species suggested to be close relatives. Our ®ndings show that Arabidopsis, as traditionally recognized, is polyphyletic. The genus, as recircumscribed based on our results, (1) now includes species previously placed in Cardaminopsis and Hylandra as well as three species of Arabis and (2) excludes species now placed in Crucihimalaya, Beringia, Olimar- abidopsis, Pseudoarabidopsis, and Ianhedgea. Key words: Arabidopsis, Arabis, Beringia, Brassicaceae, Crucihimalaya, ITS phylogeny, Olimarabidopsis, Pseudoar- abidopsis. Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. was ®rst rec- netic studies and has played a major role in un- ommended as a model plant for experimental ge- derstanding the various biological processes in netics over a half century ago (Laibach, 1943). In higher plants (see references in Somerville & Mey- recent years, many biologists worldwide have fo- erowitz, 2002). The intraspeci®c phylogeny of A. cused their research on this plant. As indicated by thaliana has been examined by Vander Zwan et al. Patrusky (1991), the widespread acceptance of A. (2000). Despite the acceptance of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List
    Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Abronia turbinata Torr. ex S. Consortium of California Turbinate Sand-verbena A/PH Nyctaginaceae 2 Watson Herbaria Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (E.A. McGregor) Consortium of California Abrams' Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 1B.2 4-5 Reveal [synonym: Oxytheca Herbaria parishii var. abramsii] Acanthoscyphus parishii Consortium of California Parish Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 4.2 1 (Parry) Small var. parishii Herbaria Acmispon glaber var. Consortium of California brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet Short Deerweed PH Fabaceae 1 Herbaria Acmispon heermannii Heermann Lotus or Consortium of California (Durand & Hilg.) Brouillet var. PH Fabaceae 4 Hosackia Herbaria heermannii Acmispon heermannii var. Roundleaf Heermann Consortium of California PH Fabaceae 1 orbicularis (A. Gray) Brouillet Lotus or Hosackia Herbaria Acmispon junceus (Bentham) Consortium of California Rush Hosackia AH Fabaceae 2 Brouillet var. junceus Herbaria 1 Locally Important Plant List- Dec. 2018 Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Acmispon micranthus (Torrey Consortium of California Grab Hosackia or Lotus AH Fabaceae 3 & A. Gray) Brouillet Herbaria Acmispon parviflorus Consortium of California Tiny Lotus AH Fabaceae 2 (Bentham) D.D. Sokoloff Herbaria Consortium of California Agrostis hallii Vasey Hall's Bentgrass PG Poaceae 1 Herbaria Common or Broadleaf Consortium of California Alisma plantago-aquaticum L. PH Alismataceae 4 Water-plantain Herbaria Consortium of California Allium amplectens Torrey Narrowleaf Onion PG Alliaceae 1 Herbaria Allium denticulatum (Traub) Consortium of California Dentate Fringed Onion PG Alliaceae 1 D.
    [Show full text]