DOCSLIB.ORG

Allerdale Borough Council 2/2008/0261

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Allerdale Borough Council 2/2008/0261 Allerdale Borough Council 2/2008/0261 Reference No: 2/2008/0261 Received: 12 March 2008 Proposed Construction of six wind turbines and associated Development: infrastructure designed to enable site access, wind monitoring and the generation of electricity for export to the Local Electricity Distribution Network Drawing Numbers: Location: Hill Farm Tallentire Cockermouth Applicant: Renewable Energy Systems UK and Ireland Ltd Constraints: Radon Assessment National Park Boundary Allerdale Flood Zone 1 British Coal Area ASCA Area ASCA Area ASCA Area ASCA Area Policies: National Planning Statements (Draft) EN-1 – National Policy Statement for Energy EN-3 – Energy Infrastructure National Planning Policies PPS22 – Renewable Energy (and the Companion Guide) PPS1 – Delivering Sustainable Development (Annexe on Climate Change) The Government has recently deleted the North West of England Plan Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021, therefore its planning policies are no longer a material planning consideration. Cumbria and Lake District Joint Structure Plan 2001- 2016 (Saved) Policy ST4 – Not applicable as the scheme constitutes a ‘small group’. Policy R44 - Renewable energy outside the Lake District National Park and AONBs Policy E34 – Areas and features of natioanl and international conservation importance. Policy E35 – Areas and features of nature conservation interest other than those of national and international conservation importance. Policy E37 - Landscape character Allerdale Local Plan, Adopted 1999 (Saved) Policy CO22 - Protection of archaeological remains Policy EN6 – Location of potentially polluting development Policy EN7 - Location of pollution sensitive development Policy EN9 – Contaminated/derelict land Policy EN17 - Safeguarding the best agricultural land Policy EN19 - Landscape Protection Policy EN20 - Protection of AONB Policy EN25 - Protecting the open countryside In addition, Cumbria County Council has produced an adopted Cumbria Wind Energy Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) which has also been adopted by Allerdale Borough Council, January 2008 (which attaches significant weight at the recent allowed appeal decision at Hellrigg, Silloth). Representations: Ministry of Defence – No objections. NATS – Object to the proposal – conflicts with their safeguarding criteria (impact on Lowther Hill). Cumbria County Council – Object to the proposal as contrary to Policies R44 and E37, with significant adverse impact on local landscape character and visual amenity of the area. Their impact on landscape character refers to the location of the six turbines in landscape character type, 5a - Lowland Ridge and Valley, and sub-type 12b - Higher Limestone (Rolling Ridge). The site is located between the Lake District National Park (to the east) and the Solway Coast AONB (on the north- west). The site occupies a side of a small summit with a minor road traversing through the turbines, resulting in two clusters of three turbines. The Cumbria Wind Energy SPD advises the site has moderate sensitivity and capacity with a capacity of up to 3-5 turbines or, exceptionally, 6-9. The County consider the exposed nature of the site, its proximity to Gilcrux and Tallentire and human scale limits the capacity of the site to accommodate wind energy schemes without significant adverse effects arising. The County observe that the applicant accepts that the proposal will have a significant effect on landscape character within 6km of the site and would introduce features that would be prominent in the local landscape. The County agree, and in addition consider that the proposal could be dominant in relation to existing lower scale elements (particularly Gilcrux), exacerbated by the exposed nature of the site, the size of the turbines against the backdrop of shelter belts in the locality of the site. Concern was also expressed on the change of character of the minor road that bisects the site due to significant loss of hedgerows (to provide visibility splays), with no evidence of their reinstatement. The County also agree that in localised points the proposal may result in significant adverse impact on the character and natural landscape designation (2.5 km to National Park, 4.5 km from the AONB) and the World Heritage site, but due to the local topography, the character of these designations (especially the National Park) would be significantly affected. The County consider the significant prominence and detrimental impact of the development to the surrounding landscape is not outweighed by the benefits that would arise from renewable energy generation. In terms of visual effect, the County observe that the applicant identified that significant effects would occur within 5km of the site which would affect the settlements of Gilcrux, Tallentire, Dovenby, Oughterside, Prospect, Aspatria, Allonby, Crosby, Townhead, Dalston, Great Broughton and Little Broughton. However, visibility in the centre of these settlements may be screened by buildings or existing trees. Limited views would occur from the National Park, Bridekirk and Cockermouth. The County, similarly to the landscape assessment, agree that there may be some localised significant impact from some parts of the national designations but overall the designations would not be significantly affected. The County conclude the proposal would have a significant impact on visual amenity with 6km of the site. The scale and exposed location of the proposal would cause a significant effect on the visual amenity of individual properties, including small scale settlements and roads. The significant impact does not outweigh the environmental renewable energy benefits of the scheme. In reference to cumulative landscape and visual impact, the County accounted for other applications under consideration at the time of the application within 30km of the site. Reference is particularly made to the Flimby application (approved), and the larger revised scheme increasing its height (allowed on appeal), plus Fleeter Wood (Tallentire) which has since been withdrawn, and Wharrels Hill (Bothel) – all within 5km. The County is concerned with the applicant’s assessment that there would be significant cumulative effects within 5km distance of the site. This would result in strong visual connections due to height, number of turbines, and area of scale with the small scale characteristics of the area. Cumulatively with existing and proposed developments this could result in 22 turbines being located in the landscape character, exceeding the landscape capacity of the area. The County agree that the cumulative impact would occur to visual effect from Plumbland, Oughterside, Prospect, Aspatria, Great Broughton and Little Broughton (which may be exacerbated in combination with other proposal schemes). It was accepted by the County that the cumulative impact from viewpoints, roads and routes would not be significant. The County therefore concluded the proposal, in conjunction with existing and proposed schemes, would reinforce the cumulative effects, collectively becoming large scale, prominent features in the landscape. They consider the cumulative harm is not outweighed by the environmental renewable energy benefits of the proposed scheme. The County also initially raised highway objections due to insufficient evidence on the highway access issues, especially on the haul route (avoiding the introduction of any rear access off the A595 by utilising the existing unclassified highway) Traffic Management Plan and crossing points on the minor road between Tallentire and Gilcrux). Amendments have been received from the applicant. The County, from an archaeological perspective, advises the site is located in an area of archaeological potential but this can be safeguarded under a planning condition for recording the archaeology of any fields. The County highlight the national and regional policies and targets for renewable energy development (including reference to the Regional Spatial Strategy emerging at the time of the consultation in 2008 which has since been deleted). The County acknowledge the merits of the scheme which contributes a further 15 mW capacity to the county targets (serving 6,700 households). They conclude the significant landscape and visual effects at the local level need to be balanced against the environmental and other benefits from the scheme but conclude, both individually and cumulatively with other existing and proposed schemes, the proposal would be unacceptable. The County Council confirm the additional evidence submitted by the applicant does not change their view on the original submission. Although a revised cumulative impact allowed for the withdrawal of some schemes, other schemes have been submitted into the planning system, therefore their grounds of impact on cumulative impact remains. Cumbria Tourism – No evidence or research by the applicant as to the effect the development will have on the value of visitor economy in the area, therefore the Environmental Impact Assessment’s comments on this issue cannot be substantiated with a number of local tourism businesses being extremely worried about the potential effects on their businesses’ long term sustainability. Dearham Parish Council – Recommend refusal on the grounds of: 1. Proximity of the turbines to Tallentire. 2. Proximity to dwellings. 3. Adverse visual impact of the 100m turbines on Tallentire Hill’s local landmark. 4. Wider visual impact of the turbines on the Solway Coast AONB and the Lakeland fells. 5. Cumulative impact with other applications
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ALLERDALE DISTRICT WARDS REVIEW 2016 an Initial Submission
    ALLERDALE DISTRICT WARDS REVIEW 2016 An initial submission on behalf of the Labour Group of Allerdale Councillors. A. Methodology for Area allocations The starting point for this submission to the review process is that the Allerdale District is made up of seven Areas, each centred on a town as service centre and its hinterland. These areas were first defined by the County Council as part of its initiation of the “Neighbourhood Forms” concept in the late 1980s and have evolved since into the pattern now used by Allerdale Council for engagement with members and localities, shown in this map: The map was originally based on school catchment areas. Following a review of “natural communities” by the Health service in 2000, it began to be used to define primary care boundaries. Under localism and devolution policy in the 2000s it was also used to define neighbourhood policing areas, community regeneration areas, childrens centre areas, parish council groupings, and planning policy areas, amongst others. Although some organisations, under budget pressures, have resiled from earlier commitments to use these Areas for organisation and service planning, they remain the most appropriate basis for any division of Allerdale into smaller areas. Accordingly it is suggested that these Areas should be the starting point for consideration of ward boundaries – following the pattern of the parliamentary boundary review which uses counties within the Region as its starting point. The first step is therefore to define the quota, making an assumption of 48 members as the size of the Council based a) on the actual electorate in 2016 (a quota of 1576 electors); and b) on the forecast electorate in 2022 as estimated by the Elections Officer at the Council (a quota of 1622 electors).
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Oughterside and Allerby Parish Council
    MINUTES OF OUGHTERSIDE AND ALLERBY PARISH COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY 9TH MAY 2017 AT 7.20PM IN PROSPECT VILLAGE HALL Present O&A Parish Councillors Mrs L Preston-Miller (acting chairman) Mrs P Lukeman Mrs L Milton Mr J Cowan. Parish Clerk Mr M Milner Allerdale Borough Councillor Mr J Lister ABC Cumbria County Councillor Hugo Martin CCC Members of the Public 2 members of the public present Bob Scott. O&A Lengthsman Meeting Opened: The chairman declared the meeting open at 7.20pm. 166.00 Apologises Mr P Milton (chairman) 167.00 Declaration of interests None 168.00 To approve and accept the minutes of the last meeting held on Tuesday 11th April, as a true record. 168.01. The minutes were proposed for acceptance by Cllr L P-M and seconded by Cllr L.M and unanimously accepted by the council. Chairman signed as a true record. Page 57 (1 of 5) Chairman’s signature………………………………………...…13th June 2017 169.00 Public Participation Session. 15 minutes allowed. 169.01 The clerk had 2 outstanding items, minute 155.05 concerning the traffic survey, Highways have advised that O&A are on the list but it could be a few weeks yet. Minute 155.09 Highways ref W171435027, pot hole opposite 3/5 Moorside is still being assessed. 169.02 The problems with driveway at Greenway are still under review and clerk to chase again and advise property owner of the job number. 169.03 Clerk, asked about the flag Pole and bus stop flag at Temple Bank, he was unable to give a time for its replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
    Status: Point in time view as at 23/05/2017. Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2015 No. 596 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ENGLAND The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 Made - - - - 18th March 2015 Laid before Parliament 24th March 2015 Coming into force - - 15th April 2015 The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 59, 60, 61, 74 and 333(7) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 F1 and section 54 of the Coal Industry Act 1994 F2, makes the following Order: F1 1990 c. 8. Section 59 was amended by section 1 of, and Schedule 1 to, the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 (c. 27); section 60 was amended by section 4(1) of the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013; section 74 was amended by section 121 of, and Schedule 12 to, the Localism Act 2011 (c. 20), sections 19(1) and 32 of, and Schedule 7 to, the Planning and Compensation Act 1991 (c. 34) and section 344 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (c. 29). F2 1994 c. 21, to which there is an amendment not relevant to this Order. Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Order modified (23.2.2017) by High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Act 2017 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Group
    FAO [email protected] Allerdale Boundary Commission Review Part 2 Submission of the Independent Group Introduction The Independent Group met on Thursday 1st December to consider the proposals tabled by Officers at the Group Leaders' Meeting the preceding Monday 28th November. Being a group not affiliated with any political party, the group's six members main concern is to properly represent the views of their respective electorates specifically in: • Dalton Ward • Broughton St Bridgets Ward • Harrington Workington Ward • All Saints Cockermouth Ward • Keswick Ward • Aspatria Ward In relation to the boundary review process Part 2, its nature is such that members of the group have engaged in general discussion within e.g. local parish councils on the matter, but have not until the week commencing 28th November been in a position to consider the implications both locally or more widely arising from the work of the Officer group which was not made available until that date. The three major Groups in Allerdale – Labour, Conservatives and Independent – have all shared thoughts as the process has advanced over recent weeks, both through the Leaders' Group but also informally between those councillors who have taken the lead within each group for 'number-crunching' and map-making. Much common ground has emerged, but there are of course differences which in large part are probably conditioned by the fact that in most wards political representation tends to be the monopoly of a single party. This in turn both enhances the ability of winning parties to articulate the needs and perceptions of those communities, but simultaneously diminishes their ability to speak with equal authority on the needs and perceptions of communities they have little experience of representing.
    [Show full text]
  • Allerdale Below Derwent Ward
    DO BE CAUTIOUS ABOUT INTERPRETATION OF THESE FIGURES. See The Introduction statement POPULATION INDICATORS ALLERDALE BELOW DERWENT WARD Heysham Census Heysham Census National Ecclesiastical Ecclesiastical Returns Households Population Protestation Returns Population data Diocese Census Denton Population Census National Census National Census National Multipliers 4.75 3.6 4.75 DATE 1563 1642 1676 1688 1750 1781 1801 1891 2001 2011 STATUS R E R R R R E R R R R R R R TOWNSHIP ITEM H P H P P H P H H P P P P H Key: R = Recorded; E = Estimated H = Households P = people ND No data Ancient Parish Allhallows Allhallows 20 95 43 155 194 30 143 ND ND ND 173 832 548 273 Aspatria and Brayton Aspatria and Brayton 140 665 ND ND 354 126 599 ND ND ND 943 4435 4121 1742 Bassenthwaite Bassenthwaite 60 285 ND ND 154 106 504 ND ND ND 450 ND 412 218 Bolton(s) Bolton(s) 111 527 ND ND 163 126 599 142 154 ND 695 936 585 291 Bridekirk Bridekirk 140 665 311 1120 642 204 969 275 284 ND 1410 3498 3495 1623 Bromfield Bromfield 200 950 288 1037 416 222 1055 ND ND ND 1947 1515 1239 615 Caldbeck Caldbeck 182 865 339 1220 670 191 907 205 236 ND 1171 1127 714 369 Camerton Camerton 58 276 78 281 ND 68 323 ND ND ND 633 3474 5033 2243 Cross Canonby Cross Canonby 31 147 76 274 98 42 200 50 355 ND 3252 9196 12329 5195 Dearham Dearham 70 333 80 288 203 110 523 ND 120 ND 874 7069 2028 915 Flimby Flimby (49) (233) ND ND ND 70 333 ND ND ND 273 2415 ND 780 Gilcrux Gilcrux 35 166 58 209 173 44 209 39 41 189 249 872 303 148 Holme Cultram Holme Cultram 300 1425 646 2326 ND 469 2218
    [Show full text]
  • The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2015 No. 596 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ENGLAND The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 Made - - - - 18th March 2015 Laid before Parliament 24th March 2015 Coming into force - - 15th April 2015 CONTENTS 1. Citation, commencement and application 2 2. Interpretation 2 3. Permitted development 7 4. Directions restricting permitted development 9 5. Directions restricting certain minerals permitted development 10 6. Directions: general 11 7. Prior approval applications: time periods for decision 11 8. Revocations and saving 11 SCHEDULE 1 13 PART 1 — Article 2(3) land 13 PART 2 — Article 2(4) land 13 PART 3 — Article 2(5) land 14 SCHEDULE 2 — Permitted development rights 16 PART 1 — Development within the curtilage of a dwellinghouse 16 PART 2 — Minor operations 24 PART 3 — Changes of use 27 PART 4 — Temporary buildings and uses 50 PART 5 — Caravan sites and recreational campsites 57 PART 6 — Agricultural and forestry 58 PART 7 — Non-domestic extensions, alterations etc 67 PART 8 — Transport related development 80 PART 9 — Development relating to roads 85 PART 10 — Repairs to services 89 PART 11 — Heritage and demolition 89 PART 12 — Development by local authorities 93 PART 13 — Water and sewerage 94 PART 14 — Renewable energy 98 PART 15 — Power related development 109 PART 16 — Communications 112 PART 17 — Mining and mineral exploration 124 PART 18 — Miscellaneous development 138 PART 19 — Development by the Crown or for national security purposes 139 SCHEDULE 3 — Procedures for Article 4 directions 152 SCHEDULE 4 — Statutory Instruments revoked in so far as they apply to England 156 The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 59, 60, 61, 74 and 333(7) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990( a) and section 54 of the Coal Industry Act 1994( b), makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkbride, Kirkland • And- Blencarne, Kirklinton Middle
    5924 Kirkbride, Kirkland • and- Blencarne, Kirklinton Torpenhow and Whitrigg, Uldale, Ulpha, Under- Middle, Kirkoswald, Lamonby,: Lazonby, Linstock, skiddaw Wabberthwaite, Wei^diker, Westward^ Longwathy, Longburgh, Matterdale, Melmerby, Wbicham, Whinfell, Wbitbeck, Whitehaven* Middleseeugh and Braithwaite, Moorhouse, Winscales,. Workington,1 Wythorp; and the place Mosedale, Mungrisdale, Newbiggen, Newton, of election to be at Carlisle, in the said county, Nicholforest, Northsceugh, Orton, Oughterby, for the Eastern Division, and at Cockermouth,' in Oulton, Ousby, Parton and Micklethwaite the said county, for the-Western Division; and the Penrith, Plumpton Wall, Renwick, Rickerby, said justices further represent that the reasons'oa Rickergate, RocklifF, Salkeld Great, . Salkeld which such petition is founded are, that any in- Little, Scaleby, Scotby, Scotch-street, Sebergham, terference of one coroner with another will be =Skelton, Shirwith, Solport, Soulby, Staffield, thereby prevented, that .the expense to the county Stainton (Dacre), Stainton (Stanwix), Stanwix, of holding inquests will be thereby lessened, that Stapletpn, Talkin, Tarraby, Thomas-close, the election.of coroners in future will be attended Threlkeld, Thursby, Trough, Unthank, Upperby, with less inconvenience, and the costs and expense Walton High, "Walton Low, Warwick, Waterhead, of such elections diminished : Watermillockj Waverton High and Low, West- Now, therefore^ Her Majesty; having taken the linson, Wetheral, Wigton, Woodside, Wreay; said petition into consideration,
    [Show full text]
  • Examples and Case Studies on Shared Services
    Examples and Case Studies on Shared Services Adopted by Smaller Councils Committee – 27 January 2015 1. Buckinghamshire County Council - a new ‘clusters’ initiative ............................................... 2 2. Joint Working Examples of Lincolnshire County Council & Saltfleetby Parish Council Liaison .................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Working Together in Dorset .................................................................................................. 3 4. Parish Partnership fund boosted by SAM road safety funds with Town and Parish Councils in Norfolk ............................................................................................................... 7 5. Parishes Working Together (Nottinghamshire) ..................................................................... 8 6. Parish Clusters in Essex ........................................................................................................ 12 7. Other Clustering examples for smaller councils .................................................................. 14 Examples and Case Studies on Shared Services.docx Page 1 of 20 1. Buckinghamshire County Council - a new ‘clusters’ initiative Buckinghamshire County Council (BCC) is proposing to give parish councils greater powers as part of a new ‘clusters’ initiative it plans to implement. The parish council clusters – of between five and 20 authorities – would manage services in each parish, rather than through
    [Show full text]
  • Private 2.04.9012
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATION COMMITTEE 21 July 2004 A Report by the Head of Environment _________________________________________________________________________________________ ___ Application No. 2/04/9012 District Allerdale Applicant United Utilities Parish Oughterside and Allerby Great Sankey Warrington Date of Receipt 11 June 2004 _________________________________________________________________________________________ ___ PROPOSAL Erection of a control building and a blower building; Wastewater Treatment Works, Allerby, Maryport _________________________________________________________________________________________ ___ 1.0 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 That planning permission is GRANTED for the reasons set out in Appendix 1 subject to the following conditions, providing that no adverse comments that would warrant reconsidering this application are received by 12 July 2004: 1. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved scheme. Any variations to the approved scheme shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority prior to being carried out. Reason: To ensure the development is carried out to an approved appropriate standard. 2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 Planning permission was granted in August 2003 for an extension to the existing WwTW site to contain a new wastewater plant with control and blower buildings in order to improve treated water quality to meet more stringent discharge consents. 2.2 This application proposes to increase the size of the control building from 6.4m x 3.1m x 3.4 high to 9.5 x 3.5 x 3.8m high in order to accommodate additional equipment, and the blower building from 3.4m x 2.7m x 3.3m high to 6.0x x 2.7m x 3.7m high. They would have natural slate roofs, rough cast/wet render walls and grey steel powder coated doors and frames as previously approved.
    [Show full text]
  • AGM Draft Minutes of 17Th September 2020
    Cumbria Association of Local Councils Allerdale District Minutes of the annual meeting of the Allerdale district of the Cumbria Association of Local Councils and three tier meeting 17th September 2020 The Meeting was held remotely on the Zoom platform PRESENT:- Mike Milner (Oughterside and Allerby PC)( Lorton PC) (Loweswater PC)(Buttermere PC) Trevor Gear (Allhallows PC Geoff Davies (Above Derwent PC) Joanne Collins (Plumbland PC) Marian Fitzgerald (ABC) Ray McCreadie (Thursby PC) Don Thoburn (Above Derwent PC) Helen Barlow (Thursby PC) David Wilson (Brigham PC) Joy Pemberton –Pigott (Above Derwent PC) Samantha Bagshaw (Calc) Becx Carter (Embleton PC)(Broughton PC)(St John’s Castlerigg and Wythburn) (Underskiddaw PC)(Borrowdale PC) Freda Chapman (Borrowdale PC) Lizzie Shaw (CCC) Chris Shaw (Calc Allerdale Liaison Officer) Welcome and Apologies Chris Shaw said h would chair the Calc AGM and Marion Fitzgerald asked that he chair the 3 tier section given that he was the host and held the Zoom controls This was agreed. There was an apology from Ian Hinde (Allerdale BC) 1. Minutes of the Allerdale association annual meeting October 2020 meeting The minutes had been circulated earlier and were agreed. Matters arising. The liaison officer said that the issue of the Transparency Regulations had been covered at the October 2019 meeting and whilst there were very many councils who were compliant there remained some problems. He said that only in the last week he had looked at a parish council website in Allerdale when the last minutes on the website were from June 2019. He also referred to the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) Accessibility Regulations 2018 which aim to ensure reasonable adjustments to websites are made, so they are accessible to people with various disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • OUGHTERSIDE and ALLERBY PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting Held on Tuesday 11Th Dec’ 2018
    OUGHTERSIDE AND ALLERBY PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the parish council meeting held on Tuesday 11th Dec’ 2018 Meeting Opened: The chairman declared the meeting open at 7.03pm. Present: Cllrs Mrs L Preston-Miller (chair), J Cowan, A Morris Allerdale Borough and Cumbria County Councillors: None present Clerk: Mike Milner Members of the public: 2 408.00 Apologises for absence: Mrs P Lukeman (O&A) 409.00 Declaration of interests: None 410.00 To read and approve the minutes of the last meeting held on Tuesday 13th November 2018. 410.01. Resolved to approve the minutes as a true and accurate record. 411.00 Public Participation Session. 15 minutes allowed. Clerk advised: - 411.01 minute 395.02 refers No Through Road post still not repaired at Oughterside, but member of public advised workmen were seen there on Monday. 411.02 Well Road sign still saying Well Lane, clerk to chase 411.03 Cllr J.C had advised clerk River Ellen bank being repaired. 411.04 Cllr J.C had also advised clerk trees had been pollarded along Well Road. 411.05 Oughterside street lights No8 and No20 reported to Highway’s for repair, but not their responsibility so clerk had reported to Allerdale B.C and assured they would be repaired. 411.06 Cllr A.M had advised about glass in Pond Green play area, Cllr J.C had cleared up. 411.07 Clerk advised that although River Ellen had been repaired, concerns at another area. Cllr J.C would try and photograph the area for clerk, but Cllr felt the river was a long way from concerns about the road.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumbria Local Democracy Commision
    CUMBRIA LOCAL DEMOCRACY COMMISSION REPORT Cumbria County Council FOREWORD This document presents the report of the Cumbria Local Democracy Commission which conducted a programme of inquiries during the second half of 2005. We were commissioned by Cumbria County Council (CCC) and assisted by a Secretariat which they provided. However, we were independent both in determining our programme of work and in our findings, conclusions and recommendations. We came to our task from a wide range of backgrounds and we approached many of the issues we considered from very different standpoints, but this is the report of us all. During the course of our inquiries we took a broad overview of the operation of local democracy in Cumbria. Our main focus was on CCC’s activities but we also considered other bodies with important roles in our area of interest. Additionally, we needed to ask some wider questions and to consider aspects of central government policies and their implications. We sought to ask questions which would help us unravel the public service systems and the central government to local government relationships. Our report reflects our voyage of discovery, and our conclusions from it. By the end of our inquiries we had a full understanding that local democracy is a complex process. We had also formed a view that the very complexity of all local government organizations and the systems of provision of public services is challenging for citizens to understand. This we think has its democratic disadvantages - not least that voters may feel unconvinced their vote has any direct impact on the local services they receive.
    [Show full text]