Exploring and mapping genetic variation in wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum
Tytti Kaarina Vanhala
Promotor: Prof. Dr. Ir. P. Stam Hoogleraar in de plantenveredeling
Samenstelling promotiecomissie:
Prof. Dr. P.H. van Tienderen (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Prof. Dr. R.F Hoekstra (Wageningen Universiteit) Dr. H. Poorter (Universiteit Utrecht) Prof. Dr. Ir. P.C. Struik (Wageningen Universiteit)
Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Production Ecology and Resource Conservation
Tytti Kaarina Vanhala
Exploring and mapping genetic variation in wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum
Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. Dr. Ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 10 september 2004 des namiddags te half twee in de Aula
Tytti Kaarina Vanhala (2004)
Exploring and mapping genetic variation in wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum Vanhala, T.K. –[S.1.:s.n.].Ill. PhD Thesis Wageningen University. –With ref.- With summaries in English, Dutch and Finnish
ISBN : 90-8504-043-4
Contents
Abstract 1
Chapter 1 General Introduction 3
Chapter 2 A genetic linkage map of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) 11
Chapter 3 Environmental, phenotypic and genetic variation of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) from Israel 25
Chapter 4 Association of AFLP markers with growth related traits in Hordeum spontaneum 43
Chapter 5 Quantitative trait loci for seed dormancy in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) 63
Chapter 6 Summarising discussion 75
Samenvatting 81
Tiivistelmä 87
References 95
Addresses of co-authors 107
Acknowledgements 108
Curriculum vitae 111
Abstract
Wild barley represents an important genetic resource for cultivated barley, which has a narrowed gene pool due to intensive breeding. Therefore, it is imperative to study the genetics of different traits in wild barley, if it is to be used for cultivar improvement. This thesis describes studies of different aspects of diversity, as well as linkage, QTL and association mapping in wild barley. The natural populations that were studied were collected in environmentally diverse Israel. Using a cross between genotypes from contrasting habitats, a linkage map was produced. Due to unexpectedly high heterozygosity of one of the parents the map covered approximately 45% of the barley genome. This map was subsequently utilised in all other studies in this thesis. Genetic diversity was estimated within and between 21 populations. This was correlated with phenotypic and environmental diversities of the same populations. Genetic diversity was loosely connected with environmental diversity. In general, phenotypic diversity did not correlate with either one. Some markers were ecotype-specific; some of these were mapped and correlated significantly not only with environmental but also with phenotypic traits. Using the same populations, correlations between mapped markers and phenotypic traits were calculated. The significant associations were then compared with QTL found in an earlier study. Many of these associations mapped to the same regions as the QTL and therefore these two approaches of mapping traits complemented each other. Lastly, the map was used to locate QTL for dormancy in wild barley. Five QTL were found of which three map to regions where dormancy QTL has been found earlier in cultivated barley. For further research, another cross should be made to produce a map with larger coverage of the genome. The results of this thesis add to the characterisation of the diverse wild barley populations from Israel, which is important to the future improvement of cultivated barley.
1
2
Chapter 1
Many years have passed since those summer days Among the fields of barley See the children run as the sun goes down Among the fields of gold You'll remember me when the west wind moves Upon the fields of barley You can tell the sun in his jealous sky When we walked in the fields of gold
Sting – Fields of gold
3
General Introduction
Hordeum spontaneum, wild in Southwest Asia across a wide range of barley climates and soils. It is particularly Hordeum spontaneum (wild barley) is the common in the Near East Fertile Crescent ancestor of cultivated barley. It belongs (Zohary 1969). In general, wild barley is to the Poaceae- family of grasses and not tolerant to extreme low temperatures within it to the Triticeae-tribe. Triticeae is and is rarely found above 1500 m a temperate plant group mainly altitude. However, it is more drought concentrated around Central and resistant than the wild wheat and Southeastern Asia, although the species penetrates relatively deeply into the warm belonging to it are distributed around the steppes and deserts (Zohary & Hopf world. Triticeae includes many 1988). economically important cultivated cereals Wild barley and cultivated 2-rowed and forages but also about 350 wild barley have quite similar morphology. The species. The wild species are of great most notable differences are wild barley’s interest as potential gene donors for brittle rachis and its hulled grain. Six- commercial breeding. rowed barley has evolved during The genus Hordeum includes 30 domestication, the trait being controlled species (Von Bothmer 1992), both by a single gene on chromosome 2 annuals and perennials. Wild barley can (Komatsuda et al. 1999; Tanno et al. be winter or summer annual depending 2002). Wild barley is the only wild on the local climate. It is diploid (2n=14) Hordeum species that can produce fully and mainly inbreeding, although some fertile hybrids (with normal chromosome populations have a higher rate of pairing and segregation in meiosis) when outcrossing. On average this is 1.6%, crossed with cultivated barley. Hybrids varying from 0 to 9.6%, depending on can also be formed in nature when these the environment; it is significantly higher two occur at the same location (Asfaw & in the mesic than in the xeric regions Von Bothmer 1990). (Brown et al. 1978a). The collection of wild barley from The wild annual Hordeum species Israel was obtained between 1974 and grow in open habitats with comparatively 1976 (Nevo et al. 1979). During that low competition from other species (Von period over a thousand different Bothmer 1992). Wild barley is distributed accessions were collected from the whole over the eastern Mediterranean area and of Israel. Sampling was done from various habitats like road and mountainsides,
4 fields and deserts. Latitude, longitude, (PCR) to amplify DNA, many different altitude and different rainfall and types of molecular markers have been temperature variables were reported from developed. Wild barley from Israel has the nearby weather stations. This also been studied utilising several of these collection has been maintained in the PCR-based methods: RAPDs (Baum et al. Institute of Evolution, Haifa, Israel by 1997; Owuor et al. 1997, 1999), AFLPs prof. E. Nevo and his co-workers. During (Pakniyat et al. 1997, Turpeinen et al. successive years, more samples were 2003) and SSRs (Turpeinen et al. 2001). added to the collection; populations from RFLPs (Chalmers et al. 1992), Tabigha (Nevo et al. 1986a) and retrotransposon copy numbers (Kalendar Evolution Canyon (Nevo 1995). et al. 2000) and genome size (Turpeinen Accessions from this collection in Haifa et al. 1999) were also used in studying have been distributed around the world. wild barley diversity within Israel. However, because of the high number of Studies with wild and cultivated accessions available, there is hardly any barley have shown that there is more overlap on the material used in the variation within the wild than in the different studies. Because these samples cultivated barley (e.g. Saghai Maroof et have been collected from widely diverse al. 1995), although in some cases the habitats, the collection represents a rich opposite has been reported for some source of phenotypic and genetic isozymes and mitochondrial DNA (Nevo, variation, which can be used to study 1992). The larger genetic variation within ecophysiological issues both at the wild barley gives the opportunity to use phenotypic and genotypic level. In this variation for breeding purposes. addition, the wild barley accessions of The genetic diversity of wild this collection are a potential source of barley is correlated with its geographic variation to be tapped by plant breeders distribution on a large scale, between for the improvement of cultivated barley. countries. But it is not evident on the micro-geographic scale within Israel. For example, Song & Henry (1995) found that Variation in wild barley from some of the accessions that were identical Israel genetically were geographically widely The genetic variability of wild barley has scattered and of contrasting habitat. been described in many studies. So far, Resistance to biotic and abiotic the only research including all the stresses has been the main area of study collected accessions from Israel has been on the phenotypic variation in wild barley, conducted by using isozymes (Brown et as these are important targets for al. 1978b; Nevo et al. 1979). After the improvement in barley breeding (Ellis et invention of polymerase chain reaction al. 2000). Wild barley accessions from Israel have been screened for resistance
5 to several plant pathogens (e.g. marker alleles arises from linkage Moseman et al. 1983, 1990; Ordon et al. between marker loci and loci controlling 1997). Several lines were resistant to the trait. By identifying these Erysiphe graminis and Puccinia hordei as associations, the method allows the well as soil-borne mosaic-inducing viruses location of genomic regions on a marker (Moseman et al. 1983, 1990; Ordon et al. linkage map that most likely contain 1997). Other agronomically interesting genes involved in the trait (the QTL). The traits include a range of physiological and results of QTL mapping provide the most chemical traits (e.g. Ellis et al. 1993; likely position of the QTL, together with Forster et al. 1994; Nevo et al. 1993a, an estimate of the allele substitution 1992, 1985), abiotic stress tolerance effects (the additive effect) and so called (e.g. Nevo et al. 1993b, Pakniyat et al. ‘supportive intervals’ that roughly 1997, Robinson et al. 2000) and correspond to confidence intervals for the morphological characters (e.g. Gutterman QTL map positions. The precision that can et al. 1996, Nevo et al. 1984, Giles be attained in QTL mapping, both with 1990). respect to positioning on the map and the estimated substitution effect, depends largely on two factors, i.e. the size of the Quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping population and the genetic mapping and wild barley variation that is attributable to a Linking genetic information with particular QTL. In general, using a phenotypic measurements is vital if wild mapping population of size below 400, barley is to be used for barley confidence intervals for QTL positions improvement. This can be done either by cover map distances as large as 20 to 60 mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL centimorgans. More precise location (fine mapping), association mapping or both. mapping) of QTL requires different Both of these methods are based on approaches, such as the construction of associations between quantitative traits backcross inbred lines, containing small and marker alleles, which is due to introgressed ‘donor’ genome fragments in linkage disequilibrium between the alleles a homogeneous recipient genetic at marker loci and trait controlling loci; background. From a breeding perspective both have their advantages and a potential disadvantage of QTL detection disadvantages. in mapping populations is that the results QTL mapping requires the obtained from a particular cross cannot a construction of a linkage map using a priori be extrapolated to other crosses cross between phenotypically divergent because the magnitude of QTL effects and accessions. In the offspring of such a the detectability of QTL depends on the cross, association between a trait and genetic background. Nonetheless, several studies have shown that certain QTL
6 regions may be common to several that have taken place during a single or a crosses. Interspecific crosses between few meioses following the cross between wild and cultivated barley have been the parents, whereas in a germ plasm made (Graner et al. 1991, Pillen et al. collection linkage disequilibrium reflects 2000, Ramsay et al. 2000) and some QTL the recombination events that have studies have been conducted using such accumulated during the history of the an interspecific cross (Ellis et al. 1997, germ plasm. Usually this history traces Huang et al. 2001, Backes et al. 2003, back to an unknown point in time. For Baum et al. 2003). these reasons the amount of LD that can Another way of screening and be encountered depends on the history of locating useful traits in wild barley the germ plasm, its population structure populations is to look for associations and its mating system (outbreeding between the traits and previously versus inbreeding). In addition to linkage, mapped markers among the wild associations in a germ plasm collection populations (e.g. Nevo et al. 1984, may also arise by chance (i.e. admixture, Pakniyat et al. 1997). The advantages are outcrossing events etc.), resulting in LD notable as the development of mapping between the alleles of unlinked or loosely populations is not required and the study linked loci. Therefore, observed is not limited to a single cross between associations between traits and marker two individual parent lines that might not alleles in a population survey should be express sufficient variation in the traits of interpreted with care. It is helpful when interest. In contrast to QTL mapping, in the markers used in an association study which the difference between the two have been mapped previously, so that the parental genotypes is analysed, map distance over which significant association mapping (also referred to as linkage disequilibrium between markers linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping) extends, can be estimated. Combining relies on the association between traits and comparing the results of association and marker alleles across a large set of studies with those obtained from QTL populations or accessions. Associations mapping may then lead to a better and between the alleles of markers and QTL more reliable identification of the genomic in a germ plasm collection may arise in regions that contain the trait-controlling various ways. First, identity by descent of genes. From a plant breeding perspective, the alleles of tightly linked loci may be an obvious advantage of association the cause. It is this type of association, or mapping over QTL mapping exercises is linkage disequilibrium, that association that the observed associations are not mapping tries to uncover. In a classical confined to a particular cross, but hold mapping population the degree of linkage over a wild range of a crop’s germ plasm. disequilibrium between linked loci An additional advantage of association depends on the recombination events mapping is the potential high precision of
7 QTL location, as compared to QTL conducted to unravel the genetic basis of mapping. This is because in a germ plasm relative growth rate (Elberse, 2002; survey, significant associations between Poorter et al. 2004; Verhoeven et al. the alleles of linked loci usually do not 2004a). The overall aim of this program extend beyond a few centimorgans was to unravel the genetic basis of the (Kraakman et al., 2004); in outbreeders slow versus fast growing ‘syndrome’ in the distance over which linkage wild barley and to investigate how the disequilibrium extends may be even various physiological components of much smaller (see Rafalski & Morgante relative growth rate respond to a change 2004 for a recent overview). So, if a trait in environmental conditions, both natural is associated with a few closely linked and controlled. A hypothesis to be tested markers that cover a tiny chromosomal was the existence of a ‘major switch’, segment, but markers outside that possibly controlled by a single gene, segment do not show association with the which determines whether a genotype is trait, one can infer that the hypothesised slow or fast growing; such a switch might QTL is within that small segment. control several components underlying relative growth rate. Briefly, the results, obtained by QTL analyses in various Outline of this thesis environments, showed that growth rate is As well as exploring the genetics of wild influenced by several genes, some of barley from Israel, this thesis forms the which have an effect on more than one genetic backbone of a bigger research component of growth rate and that the program, which was set up to study size of the QTL effects may be relative growth rate and its components environmentally dependent thus leading in wild barley from Israel. The other parts to QTL by environment interaction. The of the research program included overall picture, however, indicated that physiological research done at the the direction of the QTL effects does not Utrecht University (Van Rijn, 2001), change between environments that are plasticity under different nutrient characterised by different levels of conditions (Elberse, 2002) and selection nutrient availability. and adaptation (Verhoeven, 2003). Both The objectives of the present latter studies were conducted at the thesis were Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Heteren, 1. to assess the genetic with some of the field work taking place diversity between and within wild barley in Israel. The resulting marker data and populations, linkage map from this thesis were shared 2. to study, at the population with all of these subprojects and QTL level, the associations between studies for a broad array of traits were physiological traits and DNA markers and to see to what extend these are in
8 accordance with the results of earlier QTL producing numerous crosses and studies, and recombinant inbred lines for QTL 3. to study the genetics of mapping. The most promising and dormancy in wild barley by means of a interesting accessions can thereafter be QTL mapping approach. crossed so that high quality QTL mapping Because several of these issues, populations can be produced for fine as well as the QTL studies performed in mapping of QTL, and possibly, cloning of the other projects of the program, require the underlying genes. a linkage map, a molecular marker Seed dormancy is extremely linkage map, based on an intraspecific important for the survival of wild species wild barley cross, has been constructed. as germinating during ‘wrong’ season can Such a linkage map is also vital for future be fatal. It is just as important in identification of agronomically relevant cultivated barley, as too dormant cultivars genes that are present in this germ will require after-ripening storage before plasm, especially because wild barley is germination can occur, and completely far more variable than cultivated barley. non-dormant cultivars might germinate As there was no previous detailed before harvesting, thus significantly genetic background information of the decreasing the quality and value of the particular accessions that were used in harvested crop. So far, several QTL for this and the other theses, it was of major dormancy have been identified in importance to estimate the variation cultivated barley and their variation and within and between all the studied expression has been studied in minute populations. This undertaking has greatly detail (e.g. Romagosa et al. 1999, Gao et enlarged the understanding of these al. 2003). Additional dormancy QTL from populations and given new views for wild barley will aid the designing of an further research and has provided the optimally dormant cultivar in providing basis for the choice of the parents to be more genetic variation to work with. crossed for linkage and QTL mapping. Chapter 2 presents the first wild From a breeding perspective it is barley genetic linkage map. The linkage equally important to screen all the map was constructed using an F2 populations for agronomically important population from a single pair cross traits and identify the genomic regions between two accessions from divergent that harbour the underlying genes. populations. Studies that uncover associations In Chapter 3, the genetic variation between traits and DNA markers at the in 21 wild barley populations from Israel level of germ plasm collection provide a is estimated using AFLP markers. gateway toward efficient tapping of this Phenotypic and environmental data were genetic resource for breeding purposes. also used to establish the general pattern This type of screening is much faster than of variation within and among these
9 populations. Correlations between these In Chapter 5, the genetic basis of three different levels of variation were seed dormancy in wild barley is studied. studied as well as associations between The experimental work was performed individual mapped markers and using F4 lines derived from F2 plants of the phenotypic and environmental variables. above-mentioned cross (Chapter 2). In Chapter 4, map-based AFLP Chapter 6 gives a summarising markers were associated with the discussion on the most important variation in growth traits in the 21 wild conclusions from the previous chapters. barley populations and compared with the QTL reported by Poorter et al. (2004).
10
Chapter 2
Do you remember the Shire, Mr. Frodo? It’ll be spring soon, and the orchards will be in blossom, and the birds will be nesting in the hazel thicket. And the whistle in the summer barley in the lower fields. And eating the first of the strawberries with cream. Do you remember the taste of strawberries?
J.R.R. Tolkien – The Return of the King
11
A GENETIC LINKAGE MAP OF WILD BARLEY (Hordeum spontaneum)
Tytti K. Vanhala & Piet Stam
Abstract A molecular marker map of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) was constructed using an
F2 population derived from the cross ‘Ashkelon’ x ‘Mehola’. Thirteen SSR markers and 22 AFLP primer combinations were used, yielding 384 polymorphic markers of which 202 were eventually mapped to 11 linkage groups. The map coverage was 445 cM, corresponding to an average distance of 2.2 cM between adjacent markers. To assign the linkage groups to known barley chromosomes, 33 AFLP markers, which were previously mapped in four different cultivated barley crosses and the SSRs were used as chromosome-specific markers. Due to heterozygosity of one of the parental plants used in this cross the map is estimated to cover approximately 45% of the wild barley genome. This map is the first intraspecific molecular linkage map of wild barley.
Introduction barley (Zohary 1969). Interspecific hybrids between wild and cultivated Wild relatives of crop plants are barley are fully fertile. This and the important resources for crop diversity of wild barley make it attractive improvement (e.g. Tanksley & Mc Couch for the genetic improvement of barley 1997). Intraspecific crosses are important cultivars. Wild barley is diploid (2n = 14) for detection and mapping of quantitative and although some outcrossing has been trait loci (QTL) controlling agronomic detected in the field, it is a predominantly traits within wild species. Crosses self-fertilising plant species (Brown et al. between wild and cultivated species are 1978a). important for transferring desired QTL Linkage maps are important for alleles to cultivars and/or advanced various purposes such as the detection breeding lines. and localisation of quantitative trait loci. Wild barley (Hordeum Linkage maps based on several crosses of spontaneum) is the ancestor of cultivated cultivated barley have been published
12 over the years (e.g. Becker et al. 1995, Co-dominant markers such as Qi et al. 1998, Yin et al. 1999). Also microsatellites (SSRs), as well as co- crosses between cultivated and wild dominantly scored AFLP markers can be barley have been used to construct used as anchors to integrate maternal linkage maps (Graner et al. 1991, Laurie and paternal linkage maps. et al. 1993, Pillen et al. 2000, Ramsay et In this study we have al. 2000). Even though wild barley has constructed the first linkage map from an been extensively studied, up to now no intraspecific wild barley cross using AFLP linkage map has been constructed based and SSR markers. on an intraspecific cross. The AFLP method (Vos et al. 1995) has become a popular tool for Material and methods linkage mapping. The markers obtained using this method are easily obtainable in Plant material large numbers, thus giving a genome A cross was made between a plant from wide coverage of markers within a accession 28-77 (‘Ashkelon’) and a plant relatively short time period. Their from accession 22-28 (‘Mehola’) of wild disadvantage is that they are mainly barley. The accessions were selected on dominant. This may cause problems in basis of their growth characteristics as assembling a linkage map if the well as their habitat locations in Israel population used is an F2. The problem (Van Rijn et al. 2000); Ashkelon is with mapping dominant markers in an F2 situated in the Mediterranean cost arises with markers that are in repulsion whereas Mehola is located in the Jordan phase. First, the recombination frequency Valley (Brown et al. 1978b; Figure 1 in of repulsion phase markers is estimated Chapter 3). Because of differences in with less precision than from coupling their environmental conditions, the two phase markers. Secondly, the maximum accessions were expected to differ likelihood (ML) estimator for repulsion considerably both phenotypically and phase markers is substantially biased genotypically. downwards whereas the ML estimator for The linkage map from this cross coupling phase markers is virtually was constructed to enable the mapping of unbiased. A detailed account of the QTL underlying a suite of growth-related problems with mapping dominant traits including RGR (initial relative markers in an F2 is given by Knapp et al. growth rate), SLA (specific leaf area), (1995) and Maliepaard et al. (1997). LAR (leaf area ratio) and photosynthesis These problems usually result in two rate. separate maps, a paternal and a maternal Eight F1 plants were self- one, each containing markers in coupling fertilised to obtain eight F2 sub-families. phase only.
13 To prevent outcrossing, which in E38M54 (Qi & Lindhout 1997) were ‘Ashkelon’ was observed to range from genotyped co-dominantly by Keygene 0.1% to 10.0% and in ‘Mehola’ from 0% B.V., Wageningen, The Netherlands. to 7.4% (Brown et al. 1978a), all spikes A set of 13 SSR markers were were bagged in paper bags at anthesis. A used (Ramsay et al. 2000; Liu et al. total of 233 F2 plants were grown and 1996). The primers were labeled with used as a mapping population. Because either IRD700 or IRD800 for Licor the structure of this mapping population sequencer (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, was kept track of, F1 plants that were U.S.A.). Approximately 20 ng of template homozygous for any marker could easily DNA was used in PCR reactions which be traced and the F2 data could be consisted further of 1 x PCR buffer, 0.5 U corrected as appropriate (see ‘Data of AmpliTaq polymerase (Perkin Elmer Analysis’). Inc., Wellesley, MA, U.S.A.), 200µM DNA was isolated from two week dNTPs and 1 pmol of forward and reverse old leaves using the CTAB method primer. The reaction volume was 10µl. (Ausubel et al. 1999). Four different PCR programs were used for amplification as described by Ramsay et al. (2000). AFLP and SSR markers Seventeen primer combinations were selected: E33M54, E33M61, E35M48, Data analysis E35M54, E35M61, E38M55, E38M58, The AFLP markers from 17 primer E42M51 and E45M55 (Qi & Lindhout combinations were scored dominantly as 1997), E37M32, E37M33, E40M38, the absence or presence of an E41M32, E41M40, E42M32, E42M40 amplification product. The scoring was (Becker et al. 1995) and E31M55 (Table done by eye with the help of the program 1). The AFLP protocol was essentially as Cross Checker (Buntjer 1999). The described in Vos et al. (1995), with the markers from five primer combinations exception of diluting the secondary generated and scored by Keygene B.V. template only 10 times. The DNA was were scored co-dominantly using the double digested with the restriction QuantarTMPro software enzymes EcoRI and MseI. The EcoRI (http://www.keygene- specific primers were labeled with either products.com/html/index_products.htm), 700 or 800 nm infrared dye (IRD700, which enables a distinction between IRD800) for detection with a Licor heterozygous and homozygous state automated laser sequencer (Li-Cor Inc., based on band intensity. The AFLP Lincoln, NE, U.S.A.). In addition, markers marker names were designated from the generated by the primer combinations primer combination and size of the E32M61, E33M55, E39M61, E42M48 and
14 Table 1. List of primers and adapters useda.
Primers/adapters Sequences MseI adapter 5’-GACGATGAGTCCTGAG-3’ 3’-TACTCAGGACTCAT-5’ M00 (universal primer) 5’-GATGAGTCCATGAGTAA-3’ MseI +1 primer M02 M00 + C MseI +3 primers M32 M00 + AAA M33 M00 + AAG M38 M00 + ACT M40 M00 + AGC M48 M00 + CAC M51 M00 + CCA M54 M00 + CCT M55 M00 + CGA M58 M00 + CGT M61 M00 + CTG
EcoRI adapter 5’-CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC-3’ 3’-CTGACGCATGGTTAA-5’ E00 (universal primer) 5’-GACTGCGTACCAATTC-3’ EcoRI +1 primer E01 E00 + A EcoRI +3 primers E31 E00 + AAA E33 E00 + AAG E35 E00 + ACA E37 E00 + ACG E38 E00 + ACT E40 E00 + AGC E41 E00 + AGG E42 E00 + AGT E45 E00 + ATG a Full listing of primer nomenclature and sequences are to be found from: http://www.keygene.nl/html/nomenclature.htm
amplification product. SSRs were scored parental F1 plant was homozygous for that co-dominantly. particular marker. From this observation,
Inspection of the overall i.e. some F1 plants being homozygous and segregation data revealed that a large some being heterozygous for a particular proportion (36%) of the markers showed marker, we concluded that one of the significant distortion from their expected parents of our cross must have been segregation ratios. Many of these skewed heterozygous at such a marker locus. The markers yielded suspect estimates of consequence of neglecting this recombination frequency (ranging from heterogeneity of F1 plants would be 0.70 to 0.95) with non-distorted markers. twofold, i.e. (1) a severe distortion of A closer inspection of the data revealed segregation, and (2) a serious over- that some of the eight F2 sub-families did estimation of the recombination frequency not segregate for the majority of these between distorted and non-distorted severely distorted markers. A non- makers (Stam, unpublished results). This segregating F2 subfamily indicates that the is exactly what we observed in the overall,
15 complete, data set. distances. Before ordering the markers Having observed the above within each of the linkage groups, the data feature of the data and being aware of its were split into three sub-sets, i.e. (1) the consequences, we corrected the raw data dominant ‘Ashkelon’-specific markers, (2) as follows. Each marker was checked for the dominant ‘Mehola’- specific markers its segregation in each of the eight F2 sub- and (3) the co-dominant markers. For families. If a marker was non-segregating each of these sub-sets an ordering was in a particular sub-family, all the data for calculated within linkage groups, which that marker in that sub-family were could be used as a so-called ‘fixed order’ removed (set to “missing”). As a result of in the final merged data set. The reason to this correction, for many markers the first establish the marker order within majority of the data points were lost, paternal and maternal maps as well as for leaving insufficient linkage information to the anchor co-dominant markers is that reliably map them. Another consequence these sub-sets represent the most reliable of the correction is that some data were part of the linkage information in the data. removed not because of genuine non- The marker order in the merged map segregation, but because of non- should not be in conflict with the ordering segregation that occurred just by chance. in these constituent maps. Sub-family size ranged from 14 to 50 To assign the linkage groups to (average 29.1) so it is expected that in known barley chromosomes, SSR loci some small sub-families the observed (Ramsay et al. 2000) as well as AFLP non-segregation has been the result of markers in common with earlier maps genetic sampling rather than from several cultivated barley populations homozygosity of the parental F1 plant. L94 x Vada’ (Qi et al. 1998), ‘L94 x 115-6’ Because the correction described above (Lindhout, personal communication), also influences any genuine skewness of ‘Apex x Prisma’ (Yin et al. 1999) and segregation, such as might arise through ‘Proctor x Nudinka’ (Becker et al. 1995) some pre- or post-zygotic selection were used. mechanism, the corrected data leave little room for sensible interpretation of the remaining distorted segregation ratios. Results and discussion With the corrected data set a linkage map was constructed using the By using 22 primer combinations we algorithm described by Stam (1993), as obtained 348 polymorphic AFLP markers, implemented in the JoinMap 3.0 software of which 151 (43%) were scored co- package (Van Ooijen and Voorrips 2000). dominantly. The 13 SSRs were all Linkage groups were assigned using a LOD informative without further adjustment of threshold of 5.0. Kosambi’s mapping the original PCR conditions. However, only function was used to calculate map
16 five from the 13 could be scored without distributed over 11 linkage groups. Except problems. Two null alleles were for linkage group U1, each linkage group encountered as well as four alleles for contains both dominant and co-dominant which amplification was repressed by one markers. The co-dominant markers or two other alleles. Six SSRs were provided sufficient anchors to enable heterozygous in the Ashkelon and two in integration of the parental maps. The total the Mehola parent. map length equals 445 cM. This makes an The adjustment of the raw data average of 18 markers per linkage group, (see ‘Data Analysis’) revealed that the the range being from two to 36. The ‘Ashkelon’ parent must have been highly average distance between two markers heterozygous; 59% of the ‘Ashkelon’- was 2.2 cM. No gaps larger than 20 cM specific markers did not segregate in at between two adjacent markers were least one F2 sub-family. Heterozygosity observed. was less prominent in the ‘Mehola’ parent; The assignment of linkage groups 7% of the ‘Mehola’-specific markers did to barley chromosomes is based on AFLPs not segregate in at least one F2 sub- and SSRs that are in common with other family. linkage maps of cultivated barley (see After adjustment, 202 markers Table 2). Seven of the eleven linkage (56%) could be mapped without problems. groups could unambiguously be assigned The remaining ones (159) could not be to known barley chromosomes. Three mapped, mainly because they would not (groups 2A, U1 and U2) did not contain link to any other marker, as a result of the any common markers and one (group 6) large proportion of missing genotype contained markers that mapped to scores. Therefore, due to the different chromosomes in other mapping heterozygosity in at least one of the populations. Groups 2A and 6 were parents of this cross, about 45% of the tentatively assigned to chromosomes markers contained no useful linkage based on weak linkage of some markers information. that were eventually not mapped in our The linkage map is shown in population, but have been mapped in at Figure 1. It contains 202 markers least one of the other populations.
Figure 1. The linkage map of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum. Assignment of linkage groups to barley chromosomes 1H to 7H as described in the text. Linkage groups U1 and U2 are unassigned. AFLP marker identifiers are composed of primer combinations and estimated length of the amplification product. Co-dominant markers are indicated in boldface, and markers used in identification of chromosomes are indicated in italics. Clusters of markers mapping to the same position (within 1 cM) are indicated by vertical bars to the left of clusters.
17
11 13 14 15 16 20 19 21 22 23 25 27 30 31 35 37 42 45 0 3 6
1
E42M40-299 E33M54-112 E31M55-130 E35M48-221 E35M48-473 E35M48-326 E38M55-380 E37M32-374 E42M51-280 E38M54-368 E38M54-368 E33M61-362 E33M61-362 E42M48-93 E37M33-409 E38M54-374 E38M54-374 E31M55-262 E35M48-563 E38M54-183 E38M54-183
E31M55-238 E38M54-655 E33M54-235 E38M58-84 E33M61-123
E33M54-203 E33M54-568 E39M61-116 E39M61-116 E42M48-174 E42M48-174 E42M51-220 E35M54-528
14 26 27 28 30 31 32 33 34 35 40 42
43 45 46 63 64 66 0 2
2A E33M55-418 E33M55-418 E42M48-282 E42M48-282 E45M55-115 E33M54-126 E38M54-486 E38M54-486 E33M54-518 E42M48-210 E42M48-210 E42M32-350 E33M55-436 E33M55-436 E33M54-326 E45M55-275 E32M61-382 E32M61-382 E38M54-169 E38M54-169 E45M55-465 E41M40-110 E35M61-129 E42M48-329 E42M48-329 E37M32-270 E38M54-71 E38M54-71 E39M61-315 E38M54-72 E38M54-72
E37M33-208 E38M54-371 E38M54-371 E38M54-107 E38M54-107 E33M61-180
12 16 23 28 31 33 37 46 51 0 9
2B E42M48-374 E42M48-374 E38M54-294 E38M54-294 E38M55-251 E38M55-251 E38M54-293 E38M54-293 E38M54-470 E38M54-470 E31M55-84 E35M48-91 E35M48-91 E33M55-157 E33M55-157 E33M55-156 E33M55-156 E42M32-335 E42M32-186
18 12 40 37 35 34 29 26 25 48 45 44 43 51 49 47 67 61 59 56 55 53 52 50 65 0 7
5
E42M48-171 E38M54-221 E38M58-160 E42M51-130 E38M54-236 E38M55-433 E39M61-238 E35M61-177 E41M32-450 E42M40-238 E38M58-142 E33M55-392 E38M55-510 E35M61-466 E42M48-120 E35M61-118 E33M55-140 E33M55-368 E33M55-235 E33M55-152 E35M54-370 E42M48-366 E33M55-346 E33M55-591 E41M40-445 E33M61-450 E42M51-245 E33M61-232
E33M61-340 E39M61-159 E33M55-372 E33M55-296
13 12 11 20 16 14 7 0 8
6
E42M48-261 E35M48-246 E33M61-469 Bmac0018 E45M55-417 E42M48-302 E33M55-294 E39M61-252 E38M54-349 E38M54-307
E42M48-301 E42M51-497 E42M32-484
14 18 16 15 13 12 10 27 24 20 36
7 4 2 0
7
E38M58-500 E35M48-513 E35M48-170 E33M61-370 E38M54-239 E33M55-290 E39M61-255 E33M61-221 E35M48-391 E33M55-537 E40M38-212 E40M38-445 E35M48-422 E42M32-196 E35M61-498 E42M40-411
E32M61-155 E39M61-228 E41M40-375
19
12 0 U1 E42M48-276 E39M61-232 9 5 3 0 U2 E33M55-338 E39M61-272 E38M54-335 E35M54-582 E39M61-271 E38M54-375
20 Table 2. The linkage groups, respective chromosomes, number of markers in linkage group, length of linkage group, the maps in which the chromosomes were based on and common markers linking the map of ‘Ashkelon’ x ‘Mehola’ to the other maps.
Linkage Hordeum No. of Length Assignment No. of group chromosome markers (cM) based on common markers 1 1 (7H) 28 45 L94 x Vada1 1 2A 2 (2H6) 25 66 see text 2B 2 (2H) 11 51 L94 x Vada1 2 L94 x 116-52 3A 3 (3H) 36 72 Lina x HS3 4 L94 x Vada1 3B 3 (3H) 6 24 Lina x HS3 1 4 4 (4H) 24 43 L94 x Vada1 2 Proctor x Nudinka4 5 5 (1H) 32 67 L94 x Vada1 2 6 6 (6H6) 13 20 Lina x HS3 see text L94 x Vada1 Prisma x Apex5 7 7 (5H) 19 36 L94 x Vada1 2 U1 -- 2 12 -- -- U2 -- 6 9 -- -- Total 202 445 14
1 Qi et al. 1998; 2 P. Lindhout, pers. comm.; 3 Ramsay et al. 2000; 4 Becker et al. 1995; 5 Yin et al. 1999; 6 Tentative assignment (see text) Linkage groups U1 and U2 remained ‘unassigned’.
The chi-square values for hampered the coverage we initially aimed goodness-of-fit ranged from 0.83 to 1.60 at. for the 11 linkage groups, indicating a We have estimated the good overall fit. Thus, even though the proportion of the wild barley genome current map had to be assembled by covered by the present map in the removing a substantial part of the data, following way. By repeated sampling of the remaining data still resulted in a markers, without replacement, from the reliable map that can serve as a basis for map we calculated the average map further linkage mapping and QTL length covered by a marker sample of mapping in wild barley. given size. Average coverage was based The linkage map presented in on 20,000 samples of given size. By this chapter covers only part of the wild increasing the sample size up to the barley genome. Although the total actual number of markers in the map and number of markers we used should, in by fitting an exponential curve to the principle, be sufficient to cover the relation between sample size and map genome, the unforeseen high degree of length covered, we estimated the heterozygosity of one of the parents has asymptotic upper limit to be
21 600
500
400 Map length covered map length covered length map 300
200 0 50 100 150 200 250 markers sampled
Figure 2. Map length covered by markers randomly sampled from the map. Fitting an exponential curve to the observations yields the estimate of the upper limit, 550 cM. approximately 550 centimorgans (see ‘Ashkelon’ parent is most likely due to a Figure 2; the validity of this procedure recent outcrossing event, which is known has been verified extensively using to occur in wild barley (Brown et al. simulated mapping data; Stam, 1978a). Because about 45% of the unpublished results.) Therefore, we markers could not be mapped, this estimate the total genome length that suggests that altogether the can be mapped with this population to be heterozygosity in both parents covers about 550 centimorgans. Of this some 45% of the genome. The following ‘mappable’ part we have covered a observations indicate that the outcrossing proportion of 445 / 550 = 81 %. must have occurred quite recently (in Assuming that the actual total map length terms of generations). First, of wild barley equals that of cultivated heterozygosity declines rapidly in a barley, i.e. about 1000 centimorgans predominantly self-fertilising population (e.g. Kleinhofs et al. 1993, Qi et al. 1998, and it could not be maintained at 45%. Yin et al. 1999, Ramsay et al. 2000), we Secondly, the heterozygosity cannot be infer that approximately 550 / 1000 = distributed over tiny linkage blocks, 55% of the wild barley genome can be dispersed throughout the genome. In that mapped with this population. case the ‘mappable’ markers surrounding The heterozygosity of the such small genomic segments would still
22 allow an almost complete coverage of the small to allow a detailed comparison of genome. Since the actual ‘mappable’ this wild barley map and maps of proportion of the genome was estimated cultivated barley. Nevertheless, for the to be approximately 55%, we conclude purpose of QTL mapping the present map that the ‘unmappable’ part must be enables a comparison of chromosomal concentrated in fairly large linkage locations of QTLs (Elberse 2002, Poorter blocks, rather than being dispersed over et al. 2004, Verhoeven et al. 2004b). tiny segments. This in turn is in agreement with a recent outcrossing Acknowledgements event, because heterozygosity of large We wish to thank Peter van Tienderen for genomic segments would rapidly break his stimulating discussions. The fruitful down into small segments over co-operation with Keygene B.V is generations. Thus we conclude that our gratefully acknowledged. The Earth and linkage map has fairly large gaps that Life Science Foundation (ALW) which is cannot readily be filled by additional subsidised by the Netherlands’ markers. Organisation for Scientific Research Although seven linkage groups (NWO), financially supported this study. could unambiguously be assigned to barley chromosomes, the number of markers shared between the current map and other linkage maps of barley is too
23
24
Chapter 3
Noo, we turn tae 'John Barleycorn. Thou king o' grain.' It's the unique growin soil, an' the ancient still An' the generations o' skilled craftsmen That mak Scotch whiskey the 'soul o' plays an pranks' Add tae that the pure, peaty, heilan water An' ye hiv the recipe fur the barley-bree Tae sample at yur will an 'forget yur loves or debts'. Shame! The secret o' Whiskey is oot! H Marshall (http://www.it-serve.co.uk/poetry/Worst/secrets.php)
25
Environmental, phenotypic and genetic variation of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) from Israel
T.K. Vanhala, C.P.E. van Rijn, J. Buntjer, P. Stam, E. Nevo, H. Poorter & F.A. van Eeuwijk Euphytica, in press
Abstract Wild relatives of crop plants offer an attractive gene pool for cultivar improvement. We evaluated genetic and phenotypic variation for a set of 72 Israeli accessions of wild barley from 21 populations. These populations were grouped further into four ecotypes. In addition, environmental variables describing the local conditions for the populations were used to infer the environmental divergence. Genetic, phenotypic and environmental distances were estimated from the data and UPGMA dendrograms constructed. The results showed that genetic variation was larger between populations than within them, whereas for phenotypic measurements variation was larger within populations than between them. No significant correlation was found between genetic and phenotypic similarities, or between phenotypic and environmental similarities, whereas a weak correlation between genetic and environmental similarities was detected. Twenty-three AFLP markers were identified to be ecotype-specific. Chromosomal location was known for five of these markers. Four of the five ecotype-specific markers were correlated with both phenotypic traits and environmental variables.
Introduction secondary habitats are found in Israel (Nevo 1992). The level of genetic Wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum variation of H. spontaneum in Israel has (C.Koch) Thell. is a progenitor of been estimated using phenotypic cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) characters, isozyme loci, and different (Harlan & Zohary 1966). It is a diploid PCR-based molecular markers (e.g. and mostly inbreeding annual, which Brown et al. 1978b; Nevo et al. 1979, grows in a wide range of habitats in the 1984, 1998; Baum et al. 1997; Pakniyat eastern Mediterranean and in Southwest et al. 1997; Turpeinen et al. 2001). All Asia. The majority of the primary and these studies concluded that genetic
26 variation in wild barley is substantial. This traits are more or less directly influenced large genetic variation of wild barley and by the environment, while molecular the fact that it can be crossed with markers are potentially numerous and cultivated barley to produce fully fertile are influenced only indirectly by hybrids make it attractive for cultivar environment, if at all (Ayele et al. 1999). improvement. In this study we have estimated There are several molecular the genetic variation in wild barley tools for estimating genetic variation. populations from Israel using AFLP AFLP is a method that has become widely markers. Variation was also estimated applied in plant population genetics since from phenotypic data as well as its development in 1995 (Vos et al. environmental variables from the same 1995). Compared to other methods, the populations. For each type of major advantages of AFLP lie in its high characterisation the pattern of variation diversity index and the number of was studied to see whether these differ markers per assay unit (Russell et al. among the populations. Subsequently, 1997). In addition, AFLP markers are the correlations between the various reproducible and exhibit intraspecific characterisations were studied in order to homology (Rouppe van der Voort et al. detect any general adaptations of the 1997). populations to their environment. Finally, Phenotypic characters can also associations were studied between be used to estimate the variation within individual markers, phenotypic traits and and between populations. Studies on the environmental variables. This was done correlation between molecular marker to find out whether there are any and phenotypic distance measures have correlations between markers from a revealed weak or no association (Pigliucci specific part of chromosome and et al. 1991; Burstin & Charcosset 1997; phenotype or environment. Schut et al. 1997; Autrique et al. 1996; Ayele et al. 1999; Palacios et al. 1999). There are several explanations for these observations. One of them is that phenotypic data sets are usually limited in number of traits measured and these
27
from Israel. of populations for 21 as percentages frequencies of accessions per population and ecotype, and AFLP band and names, number abbreviations ecotype and 1. Population Table S Steppic and Marginal Steppic S E Mhl 29 51 32 38 17 3 4 17 30 3 3 24 3 23 3 Nahal Oren South 28 Tel Shoket 3 Mehola 3 4 40 terraTabigha rossa basalt Tabigha 3 4 4 Tabigha NOS 1 TS Mount Hermon ME 3 TATR 4 TAB 3 Nahal Oren TA North Bar-Giyyora MH Shechem 2 Maalot Mount Meron NON BG SH MA C MM Atlit Akhziv CA AT AZ ZHerz HZ CCoastalpo Plain1726 Q Aheo 34 4 Ashqelon AQ DDesert 1536 MMedi H Yrhm414 37 39 34 4 4 4 3 Yeroham Revivim Sede Boqer Wadi Qilt YH RV SB WQ Ec ab oty brev pu la pe ti ia a on t io nd n
population Mediterranean Ec oty aes te pe liyy ra425 4 area rra and a419 ne n1 32 18 an accessions 232 22 Number of Number H. spontaneum and population and frequencyBand (%) per ecotype
T populations of 2000). able 2. Phenotypic traits and their units measured in 21 measured units and traits their 2. Phenotypic able hsooia eaiegot aemg/g/day Relative growthrate Physiological related T mea hmclChlorophyll Chemical Biomass allocat Biomass opooia edms mg Seed mass Morphological ype su of r eme nt H. spontaneum io n htsnhssprui efms nmol/g/s Photosynthesisper unit leaf mass efms rcing/g massLeaf fraction efae ai m Leaf arearatio ecnaeo eprto % Photosynthesis per unit leaf area respiration of Percentage ho eprto nmol/g/s Shoot respiration pcfcla ram area leaf Specific tmms rcing/g massStem fraction soi oeta MPa mg/g concentration Organic acid Osmotic potential Tr otrsiainnmol/g/s Root respiration otms rcing/g fraction Root mass abncnetainmg/g mg/g mg/g Nitrate Carbon concentration Nitrogen concentration Mineral concentration ae otn fro g/g g/g Water content of root stem of content Water Wat efwdhmm width Leaf thickness Leaf angle Leaf / ai g/g C/N ratio egtcm tillers of Number epidermis of Thickness Height rai irgnmg/g Organic nitrogen ai tU er c ocnrto mg/g concentration neto efg/g ontent of leaf from Israel (Van Rijn et al µ µ µ µ ° mol/m mol/m m m . ni 2 2 /kg /kg t 2 2 /s
28 Materials and Methods DNA isolation and AFLP method
Four to ten plants were grown per Accessions accession for DNA isolation. Young leaves Twenty-one wild barley (Hordeum were collected from two-week old plants. spontaneum (C.Koch) Thell.) populations, The samples were stored at -80°C. DNA containing two to four accessions each was isolated from 200-300 mg of frozen (Table 1), were used in this study. The leaves according to the CTAB protocol populations were collected from 18 (Ausubel et al. 1999). locations in Israel between 1974 and An AFLP protocol was used as 1978 (Nevo et al. 1979, Figure 1). Based described in Vos et al. (1995). DNA was on ecological and geographical data, Van digested with restriction enzymes EcoRI Rijn et al. (2000) grouped these and MseI. AFLP bands were visualised by populations into four ecotypes (Table 1). radioactive [γ33P]-ATP labelling. Scoring was done by eye, and all clear bands with lengths between 80 and 500 nucleotides were included. In total 11 primer combinations previously tested with cultivated barley (Qi & Lindhout 1997) were used: E32M61, E33M55, E33M58, E35M48, E35M55, E35M61, E38M54, E38M55, E39M61, E42M51, and E45M55.
Phenotypic measurements Phenotypic data were obtained from a study by Van Rijn et al. (2000) in which a total of 30 traits were measured for 72 accessions, including physiological, biomass allocation -related, chemical and morphological characters (Table 2). Plants were grown and measured under Coastal Plain close-to-optimal conditions in a growth Mediterranean Steppic and marginal Mediterranean chamber. Desert Environmental data Environmental data were obtained from Figure 1. Map of Israel with geographical locations of 21 populations Nevo et al. (1985). It included of H. spontaneum. For population geographical, temperature, rainfall and abbreviations see Table 1. humidity data (Table 3).
29
Table 3. Environmental data for 21 populations of of populations 21 for data Environmental 3. Table mean annual evaporation (Ev). These environmental data are from Nevo et al. (1985). index (Th) and moisture Thornthwaite’s (Dw), in summer nights dewy of number (Hua), mean annual humidity mean (Hu14), hours at 14:00 humidity mean include measures humidity (Rd); days rainy of number mean and (Rn) annual rainfall mean include measurements rainfall (Trd); days tropical of number and mean and (Sh) days dry number hot mean (Tdd), of difference temperature temperature mean day-night differenceseasonal (Td), (Tj), mean in January (Ta), mean temperature in August temperature (Tm), mean annual temperature mean include measures temperature (Alt.); altitude (Lat. N) and north E), latitude Q3.03.35 02 41 02 0443 47 53 120 30 55 72 64 38 424 80 20 10 13 14 27 20 50 31.63 34.60 AQ Z3.03.51 02 21 03 5605 06 91 130 10 59 67 60 56 620 15 30 10 13 12 26 20 10 33.05 35.10 AZ B3.83.7401 691 3- 0 11 65 05 168 -- 50 -- 163 70 -- 50 160 53 160 -- 36 -- 55 30 30 15 59 -- 58 58 -- 58 45 91 -- 57 32 57 690 100 45 45 -- 133 45 280 -- 45 59 -- 100 10 -- 436 -- 13 436 60 75 120 120 690 15 -- 12 72 60 60 -- 65 9 -- 15 10 10 48 -- 26 11 11 17 17 500 -- 19 24 490 26 15 15 0 19 30.98 -- 450 19 32 32 34.90 30.87 30 11 75 24 375 24 34.78 24 32.43 9 31.32 YH 35.02 34.92 0 19 0 13 SB 32.90 32.90 13 75 35.53 NOS 35.53 TS 26 32.43 35.02 20 TAB TA 50 NON 32.70 35.2332.23400SH 34.95 34.8032.1725HZ AT 18249 2026131310200 1510700 618 530 4546604210160 5065727530130 abbr. V3.53.2302 71 51 -10101 85 55 170 50 65 160 55 38 160 30 18 no 58 130 60 57 155 130 45 58 50 45 -- 52 50 70 436 14 1600 61 120 15 49 60 0 65 10 10 1010 80 27 17 0 20 6 15 85 19 320 32 31.02 8 1 24 34.75 16 20 0 11 6 RV 32.90 1530 22 WQ 35.3831.8350 35.53 33.28 14 35.75 ME 35.4832.13-150223013171368183270TATR 1150 33.05 MH 35.40 MA 35.2733.00500MM 34.9032.5010CA 2330141613110125170 17238 202613139 1510680 2210539 785 3240552550180 5550645510150 3934532250180 4865727510130 P B A
opulat 50 17 6 72 01 07 3 34 15 0155 10 58 61 49 43 537 75 80 9 15 10 26 17 760 31.72 35.08 G eae3.43.4231 61 51 86 2 25 15 1154 31 57 61 50 42 520 67 58 10 15 11 26 19 293 32.24 35.14 verage
io n
Lo Ge ng og r ELat. Alt N ap
T hy
(m)
( Tm 92 01 3- 0 3 83 36 0168 50 65 53 35 18 130 100 -- 13 16 10 26 19