Report by the ESA-ESO Working Group on Galactic Populations, Chemistry and Dynamics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Report by the ESA-ESO Working Group on Galactic populations, chemistry and dynamics Abstract Between the early 40s, when Baade showed the first evidence for the existence of two distinct stellar populations, and today, with our Galaxy surprising us with new substructures discovered almost on a monthly basis, it is clear that a remarkable progress has been achieved in our understanding of the Galaxy, of its structure and stellar populations, and of its chemical and dynamical signatures. Yet, some questions have remained open and have proven to be very challenging. The main task of this Working Group has been to review the state-of-the- art knowledge of the Milky Way galaxy, to identify the future challenges, and to propose which tools (in terms of facilities, infrastructures, instruments, science policies) would be needed to successfully tackle and solve the remaining open questions. Considering the leadership position that Europe has reached in the field of Galactic astronomy (thanks to the Hipparcos mission and the Very Large Telescope) and looking at the (near-)future major initiatives it has undertaken (VISTA and VST survey telescopes, Gaia mission), this work clearly has been very timely. It is of uttermost importance for European astronomy to keep and further consolidate its leading position. This Working Group has made recommendations that would allow dissecting our backyard laboratory, the Galaxy, even further. ESO survey telescopes about to become operational and the upcoming ESA Gaia mission are a guarantee for opening new horizons and making new discoveries. We, the astronomers, with the support of our funding agencies, are ready to fully commit to the best exploitation of the treasure that is ahead of us. The main recommendations this Working Group has made to ESA and ESO are to guarantee the expected tremendous capabilities of these new facilities, to vigourously organise their synergies and to jointly give ways to European astronomers to be leaders in the exploitation of their output data. Background Following an agreement to cooperate on science planning issues, the executives of the European Southern Observatory (ESO) and the European Space Agency (ESA) Science Programme and representatives of their science advisory structures have met to share information and to identify potential synergies within their future projects. The agreement arose from their joint founding membership of EIROforum (www.eiroforum.org) and a recognition that, as pan-European or- ganisations, they serve essentially the same scientific community. At a meeting at ESO in Garching during September 2003, it was agreed to establish a number of working groups that would be tasked to explore these synergies in important areas of mutual interest and to make recommendations to both organisations. The chair and co-chair of each group were to be chosen by the executives but thereafter, the groups would be free to select their membership and to act independently of the sponsoring organisations. The following membership and terms of reference for the working group on “Galactic populations, chemistry and dynamics” was agreed on: Membership Catherine Turon (Chair) [email protected] Francesca Primas (Co-Chair) [email protected] James Binney [email protected] Cristina Chiappini [email protected] Janet Drew [email protected] Amina Helmi [email protected] Annie Robin [email protected] Sean Ryan [email protected] Additional contributors: Yveline Lebreton, Fran¸coise Combes Organisation and coordination: Wolfram Freudling Thanks and acknowledgments Thanks are also due to Ted Dame, Mike Irwin, Sergio Molinari, Toby Moore, Stuart Sale, Eline Tolstoy, and Sandro D’Odorico who provided figures or advanced information on their work. ii Terms of Reference (1) To outline the current state of knowledge of the field. (This is not intended as a free-standing review but more as an introduction to set the scene.) (2) To review the observational and experimental methods used or envisaged for the characterisation of the Galactic population and dynamics. (3) To perform a worldwide survey of the relevant programmes and associated instruments that are operational, planned or proposed, both on the ground andinspace. (4) For each of these, to summarise the scope and specific goals of the observa- tion/experiment and to point out the limitations and possible extensions; (5) Within the context of this global effort, examine the role of ESO and ESA facilities; analyse their expected scientific returns; identify areas of potential overlap and thus assess the extent to which the facilities complement or com- pete; identify open areas that merit attention by one or both organisations and suggest ways in which they could be addressed. (6) Make an independent assessment of the scientific cases for large facilities planned or proposed. (7) Propose sets of recommendations on how ESO and ESA, both separately and together, can optimise the exploitation of current and planned missions, and how the agencies can collaborate in the planning of future missions. (8) The chair of the working group is appointed by ESO and ESA. The chair will select a co-chair. Other working group membership will be established by the chair and co-chair. The resulting views and recommendations made in the final report will be the responsibility of the group alone. A final report should be submitted to ESO and ESA by mid-2008. Catherine Cesarsky(ESO) Alvaro Gim´enez (ESA) December 2006 iii Contents Membership ii Terms of Reference iii 1 Executive summary 1 2 Introduction 3 3 Outline of the current state of knowledge of the field 7 3.1ThemainstructuresoftheGalaxy.................. 7 3.1.1 Thehalo............................. 8 3.1.2 The bulge ............................ 9 3.1.3 Thedisc............................. 11 3.1.4 Fossil populations . ....................... 15 3.1.5 Gasanddustcontent...................... 16 3.1.6 OBassociationsandopenclusters............... 18 3.1.7 The globular clusters . ..................... 19 3.1.8 The satellites .......................... 21 3.2Presentdaystar-formationcensus...................22 3.2.1 The present day initial mass function . ............ 23 3.2.2 Environmentalfactorsinstarformation........... 24 3.2.3 Starformationasastructuretracer.............. 26 3.2.4 Starclustersandtheclustermassfunction.......... 30 3.2.5 StarformationprofilealongtheGalacticplane........ 31 3.2.6 Interactions with the intergalactic medium (IGM) . ..... 34 3.3Dynamics................................ 37 iv 3.3.1 The central few parsecs ..................... 38 3.3.2 The bar/bulge .......................... 39 3.3.3 Therotationcurve....................... 42 3.3.4 Thesolarneighbourhood.................... 45 3.3.5 Spiral structure ......................... 46 3.3.6 Tidal shredding ......................... 48 3.3.7 Thewarp............................ 49 3.3.8 Darkmatter........................... 51 3.4 Composition, kinematics and ages of stellar populations . ...... 55 3.4.1 Age determinations ....................... 55 3.4.2 Stellaryields.......................... 59 3.4.3 Timescales............................ 60 3.4.4 Primordialnucleosynthesis...................62 3.4.5 Ages, kinematics, and chemical abundances ......... 67 3.4.6 Comparative studies in the Local Group ........... 70 3.5Galaxyassemblyandevolution.................... 74 3.5.1 Historyofthehalo....................... 75 3.5.2 History of the bulge ....................... 76 3.5.3 Historyofthedisc....................... 78 3.5.4 History of the globular-cluster system ............. 82 4 The Galaxy and the Local Group as templates 84 4.1Toconstrainstellarevolutionmodelsandtheiruncertainties.... 84 4.2 To constrain population synthesis models . .............. 92 4.3Toconstraingalaxyformationmodels................. 94 v 4.4 To constrain dynamical models and theories of the nature of dark matterandgravity........................... 95 4.5 To interpret observations of galaxies beyond the Local Group . 98 5 Top questions, and proposed solutions 101 5.1Globalquestionsandproposedsolutions...............101 5.1.1 Which stars form and have been formed where? . ......101 5.1.2 What is the mass distribution throughout the Galaxy? . 102 5.1.3 WhatisthespiralstructureofourGalaxy?.........103 5.1.4 HowismasscycledthroughtheGalaxy?...........104 5.1.5 How universal is the initial mass function? . ........106 5.1.6 What is the impact of metal-free stars on Galaxy evolution? 107 5.1.7 WhatisthemerginghistoryoftheGalaxy?.........108 5.1.8 IstheGalaxyconsistentwithΛCDM?............109 5.2Thecentralpc..............................111 5.2.1 Openquestions.........................111 5.2.2 Toolsandtracers........................111 5.2.3 Facilities . ............................112 5.3 The bar/bulge . .............................112 5.3.1 Openquestions.........................112 5.3.2 Toolsandtracers........................113 5.3.3 Facilities . ............................114 5.4Thethindisc..............................114 5.4.1 Openquestions.........................115 5.4.2 Toolsandtracers........................116 5.4.3 Facilities . ............................116 vi 5.5Thethickdisc..............................117 5.5.1 Openquestions.........................118 5.5.2 Toolsandtracers........................119 5.5.3 Facilities .............................119 5.6Thestellarhalo.............................120 5.6.1 Openquestions.........................120 5.6.2 Toolsandtracers........................121 5.6.3 Facilities .............................122