DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2009.11757V1 [Physics.Ins-Det] 24 Sep 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2009.11757V1 [Physics.Ins-Det] 24 Sep 2020 Prepared for submission to JINST Characterization of Germanium Detectors for the First Underground Laboratory in Mexico. A. Aguilar-Arevaloa S. Alvarado-Mijangosb X. Bertouc C. Canetd M. A. Cruz-Péreze A. Deistingf A. Diasf J. C. D’Olivoa F. Favela-Péreza;c E. A.Garcésb;1 A. González Muñozb;1 J. O. Guerra-Pulidoa J. Mancera-Alejandrezg D. J. Marín-Lámbarrib M. Martinez Monteroa J. Monroef C. Iván Ortega-Hernándeza S. Palingh S. Peetersi D. Ruíz Esparza Rodríguezb P. R. Scovellh C. Türkoğlui;2 E. Vázquez-Jáureguib J. Waldingf aInstituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México bInstituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A. P. 20-364, México D. F. 01000, Mexico cCentro Atómico Bariloche, CNEA/CONICET/IB, Bariloche, Argentina dCentro de Ciencias de la Atmósfera, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, 04110 Mexico ePrograma de Posgrado en Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán 04510, Ciudad de México, Mexico f Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, United Kingdom gFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico hBoulby Underground Laboratory, Boulby Mine, Saltburn-by-the-Sea, United Kingdom iDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This article reports the characterization of two High Purity Germanium detectors per- formed by extracting and comparing their efficiencies using experimental data and Monte Carlo simulations. The efficiencies were calculated for pointlike γ-ray sources as well as for extended calibration sources. Characteristics of the detectors such as energy linearity, energy resolution and full energy peak efficiencies are reported from measurements performed on surface laboratories. The detectors will be deployed in a γ-ray assay facility that will be located in the first underground laboratory in Mexico, Laboratorio Subterráneo de Mineral del Chico (LABChico), in the Comarca Minera UNESCO Global Geopark [1]. Keywords: Gamma detectors, Radiation monitoring arXiv:2009.11757v1 [physics.ins-det] 24 Sep 2020 1Corresponding Author. 2Now at :AstroCeNT - Particle Astrophysics Science And Technology Centre, ul. Rektorska 4, 00-614, Warsaw, Poland Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Germanium detector characterization2 2.1 Energy linearity4 2.2 Energy Resolution5 2.3 Efficiency6 3 Monte Carlo simulations9 3.1 ICN-HPGe9 3.2 IF-BEGe9 3.3 Simulated efficiency and comparison to data 12 4 Validation with extended calibration sources. 13 4.1 ICN-HPGe detector characterization validation 13 4.2 IF-BEGe detector 210Pb calibrated samples 14 5 Conclusions 16 1 Introduction LABChico (Laboratorio Subterráneo de Mineral del Chico) will be an underground laboratory in a decommissioned silver mine from colonial times, at the Comarca Minera UNESCO Global Geopark [1], in the Mexican state of Hidalgo. The LABChico research program will focus on ap- plications for environmental radiation monitoring, γ-ray assay and screening, as well as prototype design for detectors in underground astroparticle physics experiments, see [2–7] for some exam- ples. This program requires a variety of state-of-the-art detector technologies which operate in a low radioactivity background environment, such as High Purity Germanium detectors. LABChico will be located at a depth of approximately 100 m of rock, 300 m.w.e. (meter water equivalent) over- burden. The background cosmic ray flux is attenuated, from 1 muon/cm2/minute to approximately 1 muon/cm2/hour. LABChico will consist of a 125 m3 cavern with a usable surface area of 37 m2 (including a platform), as well as a user/visitor center and storage facility outside the mine. The infrastructure will include ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), electrical power, compressed air and networking. This work reports the characterization of two High Purity Germanium detectors that will be part of the LABChico underground facility. This report is organized as follows. In section2 the detectors characterization with radioactive sources is presented; energy calibration and resolution are reported in sections 2.1 and 2.2 respec- tively. The efficiency measurement is described in section 2.3. The simulation of the germanium – 1 – Figure 1. The High Purity Germanium detector (ICN-HPGe) with its liquid nitrogen dewar at the Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM. detectors used in the efficiency measurement is described in section3. The validation with extended sources is described in section4. 2 Germanium detector characterization The LABChico assay facility will initially consist of one High Purity Germanium detector manu- factured by ORTEC, enclosed by a 5 inch thick lead shield. The detector has been characterized, for this work, at the Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares (ICN), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) in Mexico City. This detector will be hereafter referred to as ICN-HPGe, see figure1. The physics research and assay program will be complemented with a Broad Energy Germanium detector, located at the Instituto de Física (IF), also at UNAM in Mexico City, manufactured by Canberra. This detector will be hereafter referred to as IF-BEGe, see figure2. Both laboratories are on surface (Mexico City altitude 2,250 meters above mean sea level). Both detectors are cooled down using liquid nitrogen, in a 30 l cryogenic storage dewar. The ICN-HPGe has an operational bias of -3200 V, with a p-type structure and a coaxial closed vertical geometry. The data acquisition system (DAQ) consists of a PX5-HPGe multichannel analyzer (MCA) and the digital pulse processor (DPP) software analyzer provided by Amptek [8]. The dimensions of the internal components of the ICN-HPGe detector were estimated from X-ray images and by measuring the external parts of the device (see figure1). The identified components included in the simulations (see figure7, section3) are: 1. Cryostat: an aluminium cylinder of 34.0 mm radius, 142.0 mm height and 500 µm thickness. It contains the germanium crystal, contacts and endcap. 2. Outer contact: lithium cylinder of 700 µm thickness, surrounding the germanium crystal. – 2 – Figure 2. The Broad Energy Germanium detector (IF-BEGe) at the Instituto de Física, UNAM. 3. Dead layer: this is the part of the germanium crystal that is not sensitive to the incoming γ-rays. Its thickness was determined using Monte Carlo simulations as described in section 3. 4. Germanium crystal: a cylinder of 25.5 mm radius and 54.0 mm height with a cylindrical hole in the middle for the inner contact. 5. Endcap: made of carbon fiber with a 1.0 mm width aluminium window to allow low energy photons to interact with the sensitive crystal. 6. Thermal strap: an aluminum disc of 120 mm radius. 7. Electronics chamber: an aluminum cylinder of 39.0 mm radius, 70.0 mm height and 500 µm width that contains the preamplifier electronics. 8. Inner contact: a 0.3 µm inner contact of boron implanted ions. 9. Cold finger: an aluminum cylinder of 7.50 mm radius. The IF-BEGe is a Canberra model BE2820 [9] with planar horizontal crystal configuration, 30 mm radius and 20 mm height, an operational bias of +3000 V, a DAQ consisting of a Pocket MCA 8000 A and the ADMCA software also provided by Amptek [8], see figure2. For the IF-BEGe detector the dimensions were obtained from the technical sheet provided by the manufacturer and also measuring the external parts of the device (see figure2). The components identified and later included in the simulations (see figure8, section3) are: 1. Cryostat window: a disk with a 32.0 mm radius and 0.6 mm thickness, made of carbon composite. 2. Infrared (IR) window: two thin disks of 30.0 mm radius. One made of polyethylene and 7.4 µm thickness and the other made of aluminum and 0.1 µm thickness. 3. Side electrode dead layer: region of the germanium crystal, in contact with the electrode, unable to detect γ-rays. – 3 – 4. Germanium crystal: a germanium cylinder of 28.55 mm of radius and 17.15 mm height. 5. Teflon cup: this volume is located between the detector holder and the germanium crystal. It is a cup with inner radius 30.1 mm, outer radius 30.6 mm and 25.5 mm height. 6. Vacuum space: inside the Cryostat a vacuum environment protects the germanium crystal surfaces from moisture and condensible contaminants. 7. Endcap: an aluminum cylinder with 41.3 mm radius, 237.0 mm long and 1.6 mm thickness. 8. Front electrode dead layer: region of the germanium crystal unable to detect γ-rays. 9. Detector holder: This volume is made of copper and has the shape of a cup, with inner radius of 30.6 mm and outer radius of 31.4 mm. In the top side of this cup there is a ring that widens the outer radius up to 33.6 mm. The height of the holder is 27.1 mm. The main difference between the ICN-HPGe and the IF-BEGe detectors is the geometry of the germanium crystals. The ICN-HPGe has a bulletized coaxial crystal, that is, a crystal in which the corners facing the front of the detector have been rounded to avoid charge collection in regions where the electric field is weak [10]. The IF-BEGe detector has a planar crystal in which the applied electric field is more uniform than in a coaxial crystal. These differences have an effect in the charge collection produced by γ-ray interactions which become visible in the detector response. 2.1 Energy linearity A set of pointlike radioactive sources, provided by Spectrum Techniques [11], described in table1, have been used to calibrate the energy response of the detectors. A 20 % uncertainty on the source activities is reported by the manufacturer. Source γ peaks [keV] Half-life [yr] 241Am 59.54 432.2 133Ba 81.0, 276.0, 303.0, 356.0 10.5 109Cd 88 1.27 57Co 122.0, 136.0 0.745 22Na 511.0, 1275.0 2.6 137Cs 662.0 30.1 54Mn 835.0 0.855 65Zn 1115.0 0.668 60Co 1173.2, 1332.5 5.27 Table 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IUPAP Report 41A
    IUPAP Report 41a A Report on Deep Underground Research Facilities Worldwide (updated version of August 8, 2018) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 SNOLAB 4 SURF: Sanford Underground Research Facility 10 ANDES: AGUA NEGRA DEEP EXPERIMENT SITE 16 BOULBY UNDERGROUND LABORATORY 18 LSM: LABORATOIRE SOUTERRAIN DE MODANE 21 LSC: LABORATORIO SUBTERRANEO DE CANFRANC 23 LNGS: LABORATORI NAZIONALI DEL GRAN SASSO 26 CALLIO LAB 29 BNO: BAKSAN NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY 34 INO: INDIA BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY 41 CJPL: CHINA JINPING UNDERGROUND LABORATORY 43 Y2L: YANGYANG UNDERGROUND LABORATORY 45 IBS ASTROPHYSICS RESEARCH FACILITY 48 KAMIOKA OBSERVATORY 50 SUPL: STAWELL UNDERGROUND PHYSICS LABORATORY 53 - 2 - __________________________________________________INTRODUCTION LABORATORY ENTRIES BY GEOGRAPHICAL REGION Deep Underground Laboratories and their associated infrastructures are indicated on the following map. These laboratories offer low background radiation for sensitive detection systems with an external users group for research in nuclear physics, astroparticle physics, and dark matter. The individual entries on the Deep Underground Laboratories are primarily the responses obtained through a questionnaire that was circulated. In a few cases, entries were taken from the public information supplied on the lab’s website. The information was provided on a voluntary basis and not all laboratories included in this list have completed construction, as a result, there are some unavoidable gaps. - 3 - ________________________________________________________SNOLAB (CANADA) SNOLAB 1039 Regional Road 24, Creighton Mine #9, Lively ON Canada P3Y 1N2 Telephone: 705-692-7000 Facsimile: 705-692-7001 Email: [email protected] Website: www.snolab.ca Oversight and governance of the SNOLAB facility and the operational management is through the SNOLAB Institute Board of Directors, whose member institutions are Carleton University, Laurentian University, Queen’s University, University of Alberta and the Université de Montréal.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Results on Neutrino Oscillations
    Experimental results on neutrino oscillations Ubaldo Dore1 and Domizia Orestano2 1) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Roma “La Sapienza” and I.N.F.N., Sezione di Roma, P. A. Moro 2, Roma, Italy 2) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`aRoma Tre and I.N.F.N., Sezione di Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 84, Roma, Italy October 23, 2018 E-mail:[email protected] and orestano@fis.uniroma3.it PACS numbers:14.60.Pq, 13.15.+g This is an author-created, un-copyedited version of an article published in Reports on Progress in Physics. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it. The definitive publisher authenticated version is available online at http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/RoPP. Abstract The phenomenon of neutrino oscillation has been firmly estab- lished: neutrinos change their flavour in their path from their source arXiv:0811.1194v1 [hep-ex] 7 Nov 2008 to observers. This paper is dedicated to the description of experimen- tal results in the oscillation field, of their present understanding and of possible future developments in the experimental neutrino oscillation physics. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Neutrino properties 5 1 3 Neutrino oscillations 8 3.1 Vacuum oscillations . 8 3.1.1 Threeflavormixing.................... 8 3.1.2 Thetwoflavormixing .................. 9 3.2 Matter oscillations . 10 3.3 Approximations for the oscillation probabilities . 12 3.4 Experimental determination of neutrino oscillation parameters 15 3.4.1 Disappearanceexperiments . 16 3.4.2 Appearanceexperiments . 17 4 Neutrino sources 17 4.1 Solarneutrinos .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Mass Hierarchy Arxiv:1505.01891V3 [Hep-Ex] 30 Jun 2015
    Neutrino Mass Hierarchy X. Qian1∗and P. Vogel2y 1 Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA 2 Kellogg Radiation Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA July 1, 2015 Abstract The neutrino mass hierarchy, i.e., whether the ν3 neutrino mass eigenstate is heavier or lighter than the ν1 and ν2 mass eigenstates, is one of the remaining undetermined fundamental features of the neutrino Standard Model. Its determination would represent an important step in the formulation of the generalized model, and would have a profound impact on the quest of the nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana) and the search for a theory of flavor. In this review, we summarize the status of experimental and theoretical work in this field and explore the future opportunities that emerge in light of the recently discovered non-zero and relatively large third neutrino mixing angle θ13. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Various Methods to Determine the Mass Hierarchy 9 2.1 The \Large" Third Neutrino Mixing Angle θ13 .......................9 2.2 Mass Hierarchy from Accelerator Neutrinos Appearance . 10 2.3 Mass Hierarchy from Atmospheric neutrinos . 15 2.4 Mass Hierarchy from Reactor Antineutrinos . 19 arXiv:1505.01891v3 [hep-ex] 30 Jun 2015 2.5 Interpretation of Mass Hierarchy Sensitivity . 22 2.5.1 Bayesian Approach to the Mass Hierarchy Determination . 24 2.5.2 Frequentist Approach to the Mass Hierarchy Determination . 24 3 Experiments 26 3.1 Current Status . 27 3.1.1 Atmospheric neutrino results from Super-Kamiokande . 27 2 3.1.2 Global Analysis of the j∆m32j Mass-squared Splitting .
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Underground Physics
    Introduction to Underground Physics Dr. Matthias Laubenstein Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso ITALY Scientific Fair at GSSI L’Aquila, Italy November 3rd, 2015 Introduction • Many fundamental experiments aim to detect very weak signals. They have to fight against background of different origin. – cosmic radiation – particles of nuclear decays – intrinsic natural radioactivity ⇒ underground experiments November 3rd, 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 2 Some very deep underground laboratories Boulby SURF UK Modane SD, USA France Canfranc CJPL Spain China November 3rd, 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 3 IUS Institute of Underground Science in Boulby mine, UK Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane, France LNGS LSC Laboratori Nazionali del Laboratorio Subterraneo Gran Sasso, Italy de NovemberCanfranc, 3rd, Spain 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 4 The birth LNGS In 1979 A. Zichichi makes a proposal to the Italian Parliament for building a large underground laboratory inside the highway tunnel underneath the Gran Sasso, at that time under construction. In 1982 the Parliament approves the construction, then completed in 1987. In 1989 the first underground experiment, MACRO, is starting data taking. The EAS-TOP experiment, on Campo Imperatore, already started working from 1987 on. November 3rd, 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 5 November 3rd, 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 6 November 3rd, 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 7 November 3rd, 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 8 November 3rd, 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 9 November 3rd, 2015 Science Fair @ GSSI 10 Underground laboratories Lucifer HALL B Borexino HALL
    [Show full text]