DOCSLIB.ORG

Cecda1c8ea5ba98ed5f107c19d2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cecda1c8ea5ba98ed5f107c19d2 PLIOCENE STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHEASTERN ILERET REGION, KENYA by Casey Lee Kidney A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Department of Geology and Geophysics The University of Utah December 2012 Copyright © Casey Lee Kidney 2012 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of ________________________Casey Lee Kidney_______________________ has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: _____________ Francis H. Brown______________ , Chair October 22, 2012 Date Approved Ronald L. Bruhn , Member October 22, 2012 Date Approved Thure E. Cerling , Member October 22, 2012 Date Approved and by _____________________D. Kip Solomon_____________________ , Chair of the Department of __________________ Geology and Geophysics_________________ and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT Five members of the Koobi Fora Formation: the Lonyumun, Moiti, Lokochot, Tulu Bor, and upper Burgi members, are exposed in Areas 40 and 41 (study area) northeast of Ileret in northern Kenya. Areas 40 and 41 were first mapped using tonal contrasts on aerial photographs by Key and Watkins in their 1988 study, and were not revisited until Gathogo and Brown did a reconnaissance, broadly mapping exposures in their 2006 study. The study area is located on the eastern margin of the Turkana Basin, where the base of the Koobi Fora Formation is in contact with volcanic rocks of Miocene age. Five tuffs are exposed in the study area. Four tuffs occur in the Lonyumun Member: the Guo Tuff, the Kanyeris Tuff, and the newly named Tukunan and Kisemei tuffs. This study, directly or indirectly provides dates for the tuffs in the Lonyumun Member and associated strata by means of magnetostratigraphy and 40Ar/39Ar dating methods. Paleomagnetic sampling and the known dates on the Moiti and Tulu Bor Tuffs of 3.4 and 4.0 Ma respectively, proved invaluable in assigning ages to strata, and was materially helped by an 40Ar/39Ar age of 4.06 ± 0.02 Ma on the Kisemei Tuff. Three tuffs known at many other localities south of the study area, the Lokochot, a-Tulu Bor and Burgi Tuffs, are missing from the study area. Stratigraphic correlations between exposures proved difficult due to numerous and pervasive disconformable surfaces, so that significant time gaps exist in the Lonyumun Member; all of the Moiti Member except the Moiti Tuff is missing, as is all of the lower Burgi Member. Newly discovered fossils in the Lonyumun Member have also been indirectly dated. Initial identification suggests correlation to fossils in the Apak Member at Lothagam southwest of Lake Turkana. In Areas 129 and 130 the Tulu Bor Member is in contact with the Lonyumun Member. Three tuffs, disconformable on the Tulu Bor Tuff allow correlation outside of these areas of which the Aberegaiye Tuff is dated to 2.70 ± 0.02 Ma on alkali feldspars contained in pumices. The other tuffs include a correlate to a tuff in submember D-5 of the Shungura Formation and a correlate to Area 116 to a tuff below the Ninikaa Tuff, the former being the first documented proof for deposition between 2.6-2.0 Ma in the Koobi Fora Formation. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...........................................................................................................................Ill LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................. vll LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................................xl Chapters 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Geography and Climate of the Study Area..................................................... 2 1.2 Previous Work in the Study A rea.................................................................... 3 2 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING.............................................................................8 2.1 Structural - Tectonlc Settlng............................................................................8 2.2 Stratlgraphlc Settlng........................................................................................ 10 3 OBJECTIVES................................................................................................................ 13 4 METHODS......................................................................................................................14 4.1 Fleld W ork.......................................................................................................14 4.2 Laboratory Analysls........................................................................................ 15 5 STRATIGRAPHIC DESCRIPTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS........................19 5.1 Lonyumun Member........................................................................................ 21 5.2 Moltl Member..................................................................................................33 5.3 Undlfferentlated Lokochot and Tulu Bor Members.....................................36 5.4 Tulu Bor Member........................................................................................... 37 5.5 Burgl Member ..................................................................................................40 6 AREAS 129, 130, 135, AND 139.................................................................................75 6.1 Lonyumun Member........................................................................................ 76 6.2 Tulu Bor Member........................................................................................... 76 6.3 Burgi Member..................................................................................................78 6.4 KBS Member...................................................................................................79 6.5 Okote Member.................................................................................................80 7 MAGNETOSTRATIGRAPHY.................................................................................... 89 7.1 Reverse Polarity interval in the early Gilbert Chron (4.49-4.29)................90 7.2 Normal Polarity of the Cochiti Subchron (4.29-4.18)..................................92 7.3 Reverse Polarity in the late Gilbert Chron (4.18-3.59)............................... 92 7.4 Normal Polarity interval in the early Gauss Chron (3.59-3.33)..................93 8 GEOLOGY OF FOSSIL OCCURENCES................................................................... 97 8.1 Vertebrate Fossils........................................................................................... 97 8.2 Invertebrates, Plants, and Diatoms................................................................. 98 9 GEOLOGIC STRUCTURES...................................................................................... 102 10 DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................. 106 11 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................... 109 11.1 Stratigraphy...................................................................................................110 11.2 Magnetostratigraphy....................................................................................110 11.3 Ages of Volcanic Tephra.............................................................................111 11.4 Disconformities............................................................................................ 112 11.5 Fossil Assemblage in Area 40..................................................................... 113 11.6 Structures......................................................................................................113 11.7 Future Work..................................................................................................115 APPENDICES A. GEOLOGIC MAP............................................................................................. 118 B. SAMPLE LOCATIONS....................................................................................120 C. FELDSPAR 40Ar/39Ar DATING RESULTS................................................... 125 D. PALEOMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS.......................................................127 E. PALEOMAGNETIC SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND STRATIGRAPHIC POSITIONS............................................................................................................. 155 REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................159 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figures Page 1. Overview of the Ileret area showing major geographical features.............................. 7 2. Overview of the East African Rift System (EARS)................................................... 12 3. General stratigraphic column for strata and marker horizons in study area and related areas to the south........................................................................................................... 48 4. Correlated stratigraphic sections in the study area..................................................... 49 5. Locations of stratigraphic sections in the study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Turkana and the Lower Omo the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands Account for 50% of Kenya’S Livestock Production (Snyder, 2006)
    Lake Turkana & the Lower Omo: Hydrological Impacts of Major Dam & Irrigation Development REPORT African Studies Centre Sean Avery (BSc., PhD., C.Eng., C. Env.) © Antonella865 | Dreamstime © Antonella865 Consultant’s email: [email protected] Web: www.watres.com LAKE TURKANA & THE LOWER OMO: HYDROLOGICAL IMPACTS OF MAJOR DAM & IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENTS CONTENTS – VOLUME I REPORT Chapter Description Page EXECUTIVE(SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................1! 1! INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 12! 1.1! THE(CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................ 12! 1.2! THE(ASSIGNMENT .................................................................................................................................. 14! 1.3! METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................................................... 15! 2! DEVELOPMENT(PLANNING(IN(THE(OMO(BASIN ......................................................................... 18! 2.1! INTRODUCTION(AND(SUMMARY(OVERVIEW(OF(FINDINGS................................................................... 18! 2.2! OMO?GIBE(BASIN(MASTER(PLAN(STUDY,(DECEMBER(1996..............................................................19! 2.2.1! OMO'GIBE!BASIN!MASTER!PLAN!'!TERMS!OF!REFERENCE...........................................................................19!
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Turkana National Parks - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (Archived)
    IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Lake Turkana National Parks - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2017 (archived) Finalised on 26 October 2017 Please note: this is an archived Conservation Outlook Assessment for Lake Turkana National Parks. To access the most up-to-date Conservation Outlook Assessment for this site, please visit https://www.worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org. Lake Turkana National Parks عقوملا تامولعم Country: Kenya Inscribed in: 1997 Criteria: (viii) (x) The most saline of Africa's large lakes, Turkana is an outstanding laboratory for the study of plant and animal communities. The three National Parks serve as a stopover for migrant waterfowl and are major breeding grounds for the Nile crocodile, hippopotamus and a variety of venomous snakes. The Koobi Fora deposits, rich in mammalian, molluscan and other fossil remains, have contributed more to the understanding of paleo-environments than any other site on the continent. © UNESCO صخلملا 2017 Conservation Outlook Critical Lake Turkana’s unique qualities as a large lake in a desert environment are under threat as the demands for water for development escalate and the financial capital to build major dams becomes available. Historically, the lake’s level has been subject to natural fluctuations in response to the vicissitudes of climate, with the inflow of water broadly matching the amount lost through evaporation (as the lake basin has no outflow). The lake’s major source of water, Ethiopia’s Omo River is being developed with a series of major hydropower dams and irrigated agricultural schemes, in particular sugar and other crop plantations.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Chapter
    Proceedings Chapter Kaddanarti, a lower pleistocene assemblage from Northern Sudan CHAIX, Louis, et al. Abstract Un assemblage datable du Pléistocène inférieur du nord du Soudan est présenté ici. A côté des restes de mammifères, particulièrement Palaeoloxodon recki, ont été retrouvé plusieurs outils attribuables à l'Oldowayen. La datation entre 1.6 Ma et 0.5 Ka, indique une occupation très ancienne de cette portion de la vallée du Nil. Reference CHAIX, Louis, et al. Kaddanarti, a lower pleistocene assemblage from Northern Sudan. In: Recent research into the stone age of Northeastern Africa. Poznań : Poznań archaeological museum, 2000. p. 33-46 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:106520 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 Recent Research Into the Stone Age of Northeastem Africa Sûrdies in African ArchaeologY 7 PoznaÉ Archaeological Museum 2000 Louis Chaix, Martine Faure, Claude Guerin and Mathieu Honegger Kaddanarti, a Lower Pleistocene assemblage from Northern Sudan Résumé Un assemblage datable du Pléistocène inférieur du nord du Soudan est présenté ici. A côté de restes de mammifères, particulièrement Palaeoloxodon recki, ont été retrouvé plusieurs outils attribuables à I'Oldowayen. La datation, entre 1.6 Ma et 0.5 Ka, indique une occupation très ancienne de cette portion de la vallée du Nil. lntroduction During the winter of 1991, the archaeozoologist of the Swiss Archaeologi- cal Mission in Kerma (LC), was alerted by Mr. Hassan Ibrahim who found during a trip along the Nile near his birth place some large fossilized bones which he brought to us. After an initial examination, this material seemed to us very ancient and interesting enough to be more closely examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Sibiloi National Park
    CAMPING Public campsites: Turkana Campsite (latrines only-no water) and Koobi Fora Campsite (latrines only- no water) Sunset Strip Camp: this popular campsite at Loiyangalani offers a communal dining area, water, showers and lavatories. Contact: Tel (Nairobi) +254 (O)20 891348· Email: [email protected] WHAT TO TAKE WITH YOU: Allsupplies: especially fuel (the last fuel stations are in Marsabit or Maralal), food and water. Also useful are: camping equipment, breakdown equipment and medical kit as well as a camera, binoculars, hat, sunglasses and guidebooks PLEASE RESPECTTHE WILDLIFE CODE Respect the privacy of the wildlife, this is their habitat. Beware of the animals, they are wild and can be unpredictable. Don't crowd the animals or make sudden noises or movements. Don't feed the animals, it upsets their diet and leads to human dependence. Keep quiet, noise disturbs the wildlife and may antagonize your fellow visitors. Stay in your vehicle at all times, except at designated picnic or walking areas. Keep below the maximum speed limit (40kph/25mph). Never drive off-road, this severely damages the habitat. When viewing wildlife keep to a minimum distance of 20 meters and pull to the side of the road so as to allow others to pass. KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE PARKS AND RESERVES Leave no litter and never leave fires unattended or discard burning objects. • ABERDARE NATIONAL PARK. AMBOSEU NATIONAL PARK. ARABUKO SOKOKE NATIONAL RESERVE. Respect the cultural heritage of Kenya, never take pictures of the local people or their • CENTRAL" SOUTHERN ISLAND NATIONAL PARK. CHYULU HILLS NATIONAL PARK • habitat without asking their permission, respect the cultural traditions of Kenya and • HELLS CATE NATIONAL PARK.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Sapiens’: Who Are We? Essential Traits of Our Species
    MONOGRAPH Mètode Science StudieS Journal (2017). University of Valencia. DOI: 10.7203/metode.8.9481 Article received: 11/01/2017, accepted: 07/04/2017. ‘HOMO SAPIENS’: WHO ARE WE? ESSENTIAL TRAITS OF OUR SPECIES EUDALD CARBONELL, JOSÉ MARÍA BERMÚDEZ DE CASTRO, AND ROBERT SALA In this text we analyse the traits, from their genesis, that constitute current human beings with the objective of characterising the biological and cultural evolution of humanity within the evolutionary framework of our genus. Paleoanthropologists organise our differential traits within the animal kingdom hierarchically: the ability to manufacture a wide range of tools and control fire, language, funeral rituals, etc. However, whether these increases in complexity occurred only in our species or if it is a process which other species have also undergone, or will undergo, remains to be explored. Keywords: hominisation, humanisation, singularity, tools, language, complexity, species. The uniqueness of Homo sapiens can represent integration rhythms: while the first stages of biological the evolutionary synthesis of our entire genus and, and cultural progression were slow, their speed has therefore, may be a unique evolutionary expression. increased over the last million years to the point where We are just another species, yet our development our species is immersed in a process of exponential and complexity are evidenced by our social abilities cultural and technical evolution; this is especially true culminating from acquisitions which were initially of the last few decades. developed by different preceding or coexisting That said, in the same time it takes for several species. The exponential growth of our species over biological modifications to occur, many cultural the past thousand years is the result of these captured acquisitions will have accumulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Friends of Lake Turkana
    Case Study: Friends of Lake Turkana Read the passage below. Ikal Angelei, 2012 winner of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize, works in the remote Lake Turkana region of Kenya and Ethiopia. Friends of Lake Turkana, a nonprofit organization she founded in 2007, works to stop construction of Ethiopia’s Gilgel Gibe III Dam on the Omo River. The Omo is the major tributary to Lake Turkana, and a dam upstream would drastically impact the lake environment. Changes to the lake’s chemistry and shoreline would devastate the ecology of the region, as well as the local economies that have developed around it, such as fishing, agriculture, and pastoralism. Angelei remembers being shocked on learning of the dam’s likely impact. “At first, I thought, it can’t be real,” she told the New York Times. “I couldn’t imagine the area without the lake.” Geography Located in northern Kenya, the Lake Turkana Basin is a 70,000-square-kilometer (27,027-square- mile) region that is home to Lake Turkana, the most saline lake in East Africa and the largest desert lake in the world. The area includes three national parks: Sibiloi National Park, South Island National Park, and Central Island National Park. Lake Turkana, nicknamed the “Jade Sea” due to its striking color, is a major stopover for migrating waterfowl. The surrounding area is a major breeding ground for Nile crocodiles, hippopotamuses, and a range of venomous snakes. The basin surrounding Lake Turkana is arid and receives little rainfall outside the “long rain” season of March, April, and May.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systems Perspective of Changes Within Pastoralist Populations in and Around Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses Environmental Studies Program Fall 12-2018 A Systems Perspective of Changes Within Pastoralist Populations in and Around Sibiloi National Park, Kenya Cody Willnerd University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses Part of the Environmental Education Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Disclaimer: The following thesis was produced in the Environmental Studies Program as a student senior capstone project. Willnerd, Cody, "A Systems Perspective of Changes Within Pastoralist Populations in and Around Sibiloi National Park, Kenya" (2018). Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses. 249. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses/249 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE OF CHANGES WITHIN PASTORALIST POPULATIONS IN AND AROUND SIBILOI NATIONAL PARK, KENYA by Cody Willnerd AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Environmental Studies Program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Science Major: Environmental Studies With the Emphasis of: Environmental Education Under the Supervision of Dr. Matthew Douglass Lincoln, Nebraska December, 2018 1 A SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE OF CHANGES WITHIN PASTORALIST POPULATIONS IN AND AROUND SIBILOI NATIONAL PARK, KENYA Cody Willnerd, B.S. University of Nebraska, 2018 Advisor: Dr. Matthew Douglass Abstract In recent years, pastoralist settlement around Sibiloi National Park in Kenya has increased illegal grazing within the park’s boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts for the Paleoanthropology Society Meetings
    Abstracts for the Paleoanthropology Society Meetings Adam’s Mark Hotel, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. 19–20 March 2002 For more information about the Paleoanthropology Society, see its web site at: http://www.paleoanthro.org doi:10.1006/jhev.2001.0544 Available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on 0047–2484/02/0300A1+39$35.00/0 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. A2 The latest Neandertals of the southern Caucasus: new dates and new data from Ortvale Klde, the Georgian Republic D. S. Adler1, N. Tushabramishvili2, and G. Bar-Oz3 1Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. 2Georgian State Museum, Department of Archaeology, 380007 Tbilisi, Georgian Republic 3Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. The Middle Palaeolithic record of the southern Caucasus documents the persistence of Neanderthal populations in the region until approximately 35,000 years ago. Although research has been conducted within this region for many decades, our understanding of these archaic hominins and their relationship to populations in neighboring regions has suffered from a dearth of well excavated, analyzed, and dated sites. The recent re-excavation, analysis, and dating of the Middle–Upper Palaeolithic rockshelter of Ortvale Klde, located in western Georgia, has lead to a clearer understanding of Late Middle Palaeolithic patterns of lithic reduction, land-use, and mobility. Preliminary analysis of lithic assemblages from this site indicates the persistence of lithic technologies geared toward the production of pointed blanks and retouched tools. Such traditions as well as particular aspects of tool production and modification demonstrate that Neanderthals here shared more technological affinities with their neighbors to the south then they did with those located elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Aduma Article
    The Archaeology of Aduma Middle Stone Age Sites in the Awash Valley, Ethiopia J OHN Y ELLEN J AMES F EATHERS Archaeology Program Room 995, National Science Foundation, Department of Anthropology, Box 353100, University of 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington VA 22230, USA. [email protected] Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. [email protected] A LISON B ROOKS G LEN G OODFRIEND Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, 2110 (deceased) G Street NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA. [email protected] K ENNETH L UDWIG D AVID H ELGREN Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley, Department of Geography, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA CA 94709, USA. [email protected] 95192, USA. [email protected] P AUL R ENNE M ARTHA T APPEN Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley, Department of Anthropology, 395 HHH Center, University of Min- CA 94709, USA. [email protected] nesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. [email protected] K ATHLYN S TEWART S TANLEY A MBROSE Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Stn D, Ottawa, Department of Anthropology, 109 Davenport Hall, University of Canada, K1P 6P4, [email protected] Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. [email protected] Corresponding author: John Yellen, Archaeology Program Room 995, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., R AYMONDE B ONNEFILLE CEREGE, CNRS, BP80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France. Arlington, VA 22230, USA. Tel: 703-292-8759. [email protected] [email protected] PaleoAnthropology 2005.10.25–100 Copyright © 2005 PaleoAnthropology Society. All rights reserved. 26 •PaleoA nthropology 2005 INTRODUCTION ABSTRACT This article reports on a series of Middle The Aduma region of the Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia, contains multiple surface Stone Age (MSA) sites excavated in the and in situ Middle Stone Age (MSA) occurrences that include lithics and spatially Aduma region, Middle Awash valley associated faunal and hominid remains.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery and Action Plan for Grevy's Zebra
    RECOVERY and ACTION PLAN for GREVY’S ZEBRA (Equus grevyi) in KENYA (2017-2026) © Nelson Guda Acknowledgments First, we thank the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) Ag. Director, Julius Kimani and the KWS Board of Trustees for approving this Recovery and Action Plan for Grevy’s Zebra in Kenya (2017-2026) as a priority activity amongst the core business of KWS. We are greatly indebted to the Saint Louis Zoo for funding the RECOVERY and ACTION PLAN for formulation of this recovery and action plan, which included GREVY’S ZEBRA (Equus grevyi) in the review workshops, and the design and printing. KENYA (2017-2026) We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all who were involved in the review of this recovery and action plan for their dedication and hard work. The review process Produced at the Grevy’s Zebra National was consultative and participatory, and is the result of the Strategy Review Workshop held from 26-27 collaborative effort of stakeholders that included: Bendera January 2017 at Mpala Research Centre, Conservancy, Buffalo Springs National Reserve, El Barta Laikipia, Kenya. Location Chief, El Karama Ranch, Grevy’s Zebra Trust, Kalama Community Wildlife Conservancy, Kalomudang Compiled by: The National Grevy’s Zebra Conservancy, Kenya Wildlife Service, Laikipia Wildlife Technical Committee Forum, Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Loisaba Conservancy, Marti Assistant Chief, Marwell Wildlife, Meibae Community Conservancy, Melako Community Conservancy, Mpala Research Centre, Nakuprat-Gotu Wildlife Conservancy, Namunyak Wildlife Conservation Trust, Nasuulu Community Wildlife Conservancy, Northern Rangelands Trust, Nyiro Conservation Area, Ol Malo/Samburu Trust, Ol Pejeta Conservancy, Oldonyiro Community Conservancy, Princeton University, Samburu National Reserve, San Diego Zoo, Sera Conservancy and Shaba National Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Flood of the Omo River
    ABSTRACT The multiple impacts of a major hydrodam development project on Ethiopia’s Omo River are examined through a resource use and natural system analysis focused on the half million indigenous people whose lives would be radically changed by the dam’s downstream environmental consequences. The author warns of an impending human rights and ecological catastrophe that is being minimized by the governments of the three nation states that border the Omo and Lake Turkana basins. The very real threat of mass starvation and armed conflict in the border region of Kenya, Ethiopia and South Sudan is attributed to government and development agency inaction and indifference to the impacts of the dam project. Despite ample data to the contrary, development banks, industrial firms and governmental agencies have produced reports and plans that minimize the impacts and exaggerate the benefits. This interdisciplinary report serves as a critique of this process as it examines well funded and ostensibly authoritative studies that use limnological data, biological data, hydrology, and geology to make a case for the dam, while the author expands on the analysis using field data, socioeconomic studies and ecological as well as geological studies to call the wisdom of the project into question. The author has several decades of experience in the area, has published a monograph and articles on the Lower Omo Basin, and is currently engaged in cooperative research within the broader transborder region. PREFATORY NOTE At stake with the planned Gibe III hydrodam on Ethiopia's Omo River is the political choice to either provide for the survival of hundreds of thousands of Sub-Saharan Africa's most impoverished and marginalized indigenous people and maintain the fragile peace in one of the world's most volatile border areas, or to bring mass starvation and death to these people, with the very high likelihood of unleashing regional armed conflict reaching across the borders of all three nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sibiloycentral Island National Parks Kenya
    SIBILOYCENTRAL ISLAND NATIONAL PARKS KENYA SibiloiXentral Island National Parks (Kenya) 73 WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION-IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION SIBILOYCENTRAL ISLAND NATIONAL PARKS (KENYA) 1. DOCUMENTATION (i) IUCNAVCMC Data Sheet (4 references) (ii) Additional Literature Consulted: Feibel, C.S. 1988. Paleoenvironments of the Koobi Fora Formation, Turkana Basin. PhD Dissertation. University of Utah, Department of Geology; Koobi Fora Research Monographs. 1976-97. 5 Vols. Clarendon Press; Leakey, M. and J.M. Harris. 1994. Past Biodiversity in the Turkana Basin. b Conservation of Biodiversity in Africa; Graham. A. and P. Beard. 1975. Eyelids of Morning; Norton-Griffrths, M. 1974. Ecological Survey and Monitoring Project in East Rudolph National Park. 33~. (iii) Consultations: 5 external reviewers, Kenya Wildlife Service and National Museum staff. (iv) Field Visit: J. Thorsell, January, 1997 2. SUMMARY OF NATURAL VALUES Sibiloi National Park (SNP) is 157,085ha in size and is situated on the east shore of Lake Turkana in northern Kenya near the border with Ethiopia. The region is at the western edge of the Somali arid climatic zone. It receives unreliable seasonalrainfall of 25cm per year mostly during March and April. Temperatures range from 26” - 37” with strongly south-easterly winds a persistent feature. The low precipitation and high temperaturescombine to produce moisture deficit resulting in a net evaporation from the lake of 2.5-3m per year. Watercoursesin SNP typically flow on the surface for only a few days in the year. The region is part of the East African Rift System with gently sloping hills and volcanic cones. A large petrified forest is also included in the park.
    [Show full text]