Has Australian Federal Politics Become Presidentialized?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Has Australian Federal Politics Become Presidentialized? Has Australian Federal Politics Become Presidentialized? Author Kefford, Glenn Published 2013 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith Business School DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/90 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366314 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Has Australian Federal Politics Become Presidentialized? Glenn Kefford Bachelor of Commerce (Griffith University) Master of International Relations (Curtin University) School of Government and International Relations Business School Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 i | P a g e Abstract This thesis examines the idea that Australian federal political leaders are becoming more powerful. This idea, often referred to as presidentialization, generates heated debates in academic circles. Using one of the more systematic frameworks, namely the Poguntke and Webb (2005) model, and combining a behavioural component, this thesis seeks to explore whether Australian federal politics has become presidentialized. Poguntke and Webb viewed presidentialization as consisting of three separate but inter- related faces. These were: the executive face, the party face and the electoral face. This thesis undertakes this task by examining four leadership periods from the Australian Labor Party (ALP). This includes: The Chifley leadership period (1945-51), the Whitlam leadership period (1967-1977), the Hawke Leadership period (1983-91) and the Kevin Rudd leadership period (2006-2010). In the Chifley leadership period it is argued that very little evidence of the presidentialization phenomenon as described by Poguntke and Webb (2005) is identifiable. This finding adds to their hypothesis that many of the causal factors that contributed to presidentialization did not emerge until after 1960. This section of the thesis also highlights how different Australian society and the ALP were during this period than to the later periods examined in this thesis. The second period, the Whitlam leadership period, is vastly different. Clear increases in the capacity of leaders to exert power began to emerge. Hugely important structural changes to the ALP occur during this period which fundamentally alters intra-party power. Some evidence of leaders being able to exert greater power within the executive of government can also be identified during this period. The elections that Whitlam contested display a mixed level of personalisation. ii | P a g e It is argued in the Hawke period that intra-party power for the leader increases even further. In the executive, policy is increasingly centralised due to a combination of structural and conditional factors empowering the leadership even further. Due to Hawke’s personal popularity, the ALP runs campaigns vastly more personalised than the Whitlam period. The Rudd leadership period is the final period examined. This section argues that in a continuation of what occurred during the Hawke period, the capacity of the parliamentary leadership to exert power in the Executive and within the party continues to increase. However, evidence of presidentialization during elections is mixed. This thesis concludes by attempting to identify any trends or counter-trends across the periods examined. It also compares the findings to the international data-set Poguntke and Webb (2005) have compiled. Finally, it explores the future of political leadership studies and suggests some future research opportunities. iii | P a g e Statement of Originality This work has not previously been submitted for a degree or diploma in any university. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the thesis itself Glenn Kefford iv | P a g e Acknowledgements While writing this thesis I have been heavily reliant on the support of the academics from the School of Government and International Relations. I owe particular thanks to Gideon Baker, Dennis Grube, Robyn Hollander and Ashley Lavelle who were my supervisors throughout this thesis. Robyn and Ashley as principal supervisors, in particular, deserve special mention. Each of them challenged me and the way I view the world ultimately leading to a better quality of thesis. A large number of other staff at the School of Government and International Relations provided insightful comments on this and other work and I thank them also. This included Jason Sharman, Pat Weller, Haig Patapan, John Kane, Giorel Curran and Wes Widmaier. I also would like to thank the administrative staff in the school, Julie Howe and Angela MacDonald, who are critical to the effective functioning of the school. I would like to thank the Griffith Business School for providing a research scholarship for part of the degree and also to the Griffith Graduate Research School for providing me with a completion scholarship. Finally, I would like to thank those who allowed me to interview them as well as Professor’s Paul Webb and Thomas Poguntke whose framework I used and who happily responded to countless emails. v | P a g e Table of Contents Page Abstract ii Statement of Originality iv Acknowledgements v Table of Contents vi Tables, Figures and Charts viii Abbreviations x Chapter One Introduction Introduction 1 Research Questions 4 Central Argument of the Thesis 4 Research Methodology and Methods 5 Measuring Presidentialization 9 Structure and Agency 11 Boundaries of the Thesis 13 Sources 13 Structure and Overview 16 Chapter Two Literature Review Introduction 18 Political Leadership 19 Literature on the Australian Labor Party (ALP) 27 Conclusion 36 Chapter Three The Chifley Leadership Period (1945-1951) Historical Background 38 Analysis 43 Conclusion 69 vi | P a g e Chapter Four The Whitlam Leadership Period (1967-1977) Historical Background 72 Analysis 77 Conclusion 102 Chapter Five The Hawke Leadership Period (1983-1991) Historical Background 105 Analysis 110 Conclusion 137 Chapter Six The Rudd Leadership Period (2006-2010) Historical Background 139 Analysis 142 Conclusion 163 Chapter Seven Conclusion Has Australian Federal Politics Become Presidentialized? 165 The Periods Compared and Contrasted 166 Identification of Trends 169 Conclusions on the Australian Case 172 Structure and Agency 173 The Presidentialization Thesis 176 Future Research Opportunities 177 Tables and Graphs 179 References 183 Appendix List of Interviews Completed 240 vii | P a g e Tables and Figures Chart 1.1 - The Three Faces of Presidentialization as Conceptualised by Poguntke and Webb (2005) 3 Table 3.1 – Print Media Focus During the Election Campaigns of the Chifley Leadership Period in The Age and SMH 68 Table 4.1 – Print Media Focus During the Election Campaigns of the Whitlam Leadership Period in The Age, SMH and The Australian 99 Table 5.1 – Print Media Focus during the Election Campaigns of the Hawke Leadership Period in The Age, SMH and The Australian 133 Table 6.2 – Print Media Focus during the 2007 Election Campaign of the Rudd Leadership Period in The Age, SMH and The Australian 161 Table 7.1 – Signs of Presidentialization Identified During the Four Leadership Periods Examined in This Thesis 179 Table 7.2 – Print Media Focus During the Election Campaigns Examined in this thesis 180 Graph 7.1 – Percentage of Articles That Mentioned the Leader 181 viii | P a g e Graph 7.2 – Percentage of Articles Based on Policy 181 Graph 7.3 – Percentage of Articles Based on the Leader's Personality/Family or Polls 182 Graph 7.4 - Number of Staff in the Prime Minister's Office 182 ix | P a g e Abbreviations ACTU Australian Council of Trade Unions AJPH Australian Journal of Politics and History ALP Australian Labor Party APSA Australian Political Science Association ASIO Australian Security Intelligence Office CPA Communist Party of Australia DLP Democratic Labor Party ERC Expenditure Review Committee ETS Emissions Trading Scheme FPLP Federal Parliamentary Labor Party GFC Global Financial Crisis GSE Government Sponsored Enterprises HECS Higher Education Contribution Scheme IR International Relations MHR Member of the House of Representatives MP Minister of Parliament NDP Nuclear Disarmament Party NPM New Public Management NSW New South Wales NT Northern Territory OECD Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development PM&C Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet PMO Prime Minister’s Office PR Proportional Representation QLD Queensland RSPT Resources Super Profits Tax SA South Australia x | P a g e SMH Sydney Morning Herald SPBC Strategic Priorities and Budget Committee TARP Troubled Asset Relief Program UK United Kingdom US United States WA Western Australia xi | P a g e Chapter One - Introduction Are contemporary political leaders more powerful than their predecessors? Are prime ministers becoming more like presidents? These questions have been intensely debated in the literature over the last two decades and the ‘presidentialization thesis’ has been central to this. 1 According to Poguntke and Webb (2005: 1) “[P]residentialization denominates a process by which regimes are becoming more presidential in their actual practice without, in most cases, changing their regime type”. In other words, presidentialization is the idea that leaders have more resources and autonomy, within the institutional parameters of their regime, than their predecessors. Presidentialization has become one
Recommended publications
  • Inside the Canberra Press Gallery: Life in the Wedding Cake of Old
    INSIDE the CANBERRA PRESS GALLERY Life in the Wedding Cake of Old Parliament House INSIDE the CANBERRA PRESS GALLERY Life in the Wedding Cake of Old Parliament House Rob Chalmers Edited by Sam Vincent and John Wanna THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Chalmers, Rob, 1929-2011 Title: Inside the Canberra press gallery : life in the wedding cake of Old Parliament House / Rob Chalmers ; edited by Sam Vincent and John Wanna. ISBN: 9781921862366 (pbk.) 9781921862373 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Australia. Parliament--Reporters and Government and the press--Australia. Journalism--Political aspects-- Press and politics--Australia. Other Authors/Contributors: Vincent, Sam. Wanna, John. Dewey Number: 070.4493240994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Back cover image courtesy of Heide Smith Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2011 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Foreword . ix Preface . xi 1 . Youth . 1 2 . A Journo in Sydney . 9 3 . Inside the Canberra Press Gallery . 17 4 . Menzies: The giant of Australian politics . 35 5 . Ming’s Men . 53 6 . Parliament Disgraced by its Members . 71 7 . Booze, Sex and God .
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Boundaries
    The importance of boundaries Colin Hughes Emeritus Professor of Politic Science, University of Queensland Research Paper 1 (November 2007) Democratic Audit of Australia Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia http://democratic.audit.anu.edu.au The views expressed are the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Democratic Audit of Australia. If elections are to be thought fair, their outcomes should correspond as closely as possible to the inputs of voter preferences. A particular percentage of the votes counted for a party should produce close to the same percentage of the seats won by that party. Down that path lie the topics of partisan bias and proportional representation with multi-member electoral districts as the most common solution. But there is a second criterion of fairness which is that outcomes should correspond to the numbers of electors or people to be represented. That criterion is often called equality, and down that path lie the topics of malapportionment and enforced equality as a solution. The two criteria may not work in the same direction.1 In Australia the problem of equality has been debated mainly with respect to the dichotomy of town and country, ‘town’ usually meaning the State capital(s) which have been invariably by far the largest urban center in each State and ‘country’ the rest, though sometimes the larger provincial cities and towns get lumped in with their local metropolis. Should town voters have the same quantity of representation, measured by the number of electors in the electoral districts, as country voters? There has also been a sub-plot, which is what this paper is about, that concerns the existence of a small number of electoral districts spread over exceptionally large areas in which the population, and consequently the numbers of electors, is relatively thin on the ground and widely scattered.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference of the Samuel Griffith
    Chapter Four Independents and Minor Parties in the Commonwealth Parliament J. B. Paul I accepted Julian Leeser’s invitation to address the Society on this subject without a second thought. Had I thought twice about it I might have queried him on a vexing problem: how to compress this subject into a presentation confined to thirty minutes. It follows that my fully prepared statement will have to be published with the other papers. The first and shorter part of this paper will deal with the House of Representatives; the second and more important part will deal with the Senate. The House of Representatives Two factors have limited the role of Independents and minor parties in the House: it comprises single-member constituencies and two succeeding electoral systems have governed its elections. From 1901 to 1918 the simple majority/plurality system applied. This has been misnamed “first-past-the-post”: a misnomer because there was no fixed post for the winning candidate to get past. Independents found it difficult to top the poll against candidates endorsed by political parties. Independents found their position more favourable under the preferential system introduced in 1918 especially when a seat was being contested by three or more candidates. If the count went to preferences an Independent could move to a winning position from behind with each distribution. Not that this happened often! I would isolate two examples when an Independent has succeeded. In the 1922 election, a prominent leader of the Victorian Bar, J G Latham, KC, contested and won the seat of Kooyong, then held by a grandee of the Nationalist Party, Sir Robert Best.
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Labor out of the Wilderness
    14. Labor Out of the Wilderness In March 1963, The Daily Telegraph published a bombshell picture of the Opposition Leader, Arthur Calwell, and his deputy, Gough Whitlam, waiting in the dead of night outside the Kingston Hotel for 36 members of the specially convened ALP National Conference to vote on the Menzies Government’s legislation for a US naval communications base at North West Cape in Western Australia. This gave Whitlam a powerful weapon in his mission to transform the Australian Labor Party into a democratic national institution. Many inside and outside the Labor Party today would argue it is far from a truly democratic party. This is fair criticism, but when compared with the Liberal Party (Australia’s most successful postwar party), the Labor Party is far more democratic. Under Prime Minister John Howard, who over four parliamentary terms assumed the role of an elected dictator, the federal parliamentary Liberal Party was less democratic than ever. Whitlam’s achievements were at least as great when in opposition as when he was Prime Minister. Whitlam ranks with Menzies as one of Australia’s most significant political leaders. Menzies came back from his failed prewar career to unite the dispirited and impotent conservatives and overthrow a socialist Labor government that appeared to have a stranglehold on power. Whitlam brought together a divided and hopeless Labor Party to return it to power after its longest period in opposition, and changed politics profoundly. To the astonishment of the nation, Whitlam was sacked by the Governor-General, Sir John Kerr, on Remembrance Day, 11 November 1975, despite having the confidence of the Lower House of Parliament both before and after his sacking.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference of the Samuel Griffith Society
    Upholding the Australian Constitution Volume Twenty-five Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Conference of The Samuel Griffith Society Rydges, North Sydney — November 2013 © Copyright 2015 by The Samuel Griffith Society. All rights reserved. Contents Introduction Julian Leeser The Fifth Sir Harry Gibbs Memorial Oration The Honourable Dyson Heydon Sir Samuel Griffith as Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia Chapter One Greg Craven A Federalist Agenda for the Government’s White Paper Chapter Two Anne Twomey Money, Power and Pork-Barrelling: Expenditure of Public Money without Parliamentary Authorisation Chapter Three Keith Kendall Comparative Federal Income Tax Chapter Four J. B. Paul Independents and Minor Parties in the Commonwealth Parliament Chapter Five Ian McAllister Reforming the Senate Electoral System Chapter Six Malcolm Mackerras Electing the Australian Senate: In Defence of the Present System Chapter Seven Gim Del Villar TheKable Case i Chapter Eight Nicholas Cater The Human Rights Commission: A Failed Experiment Chapter Nine Damien Freeman Meagher, Mabo and Patrick White’s tea-cosy – 20 Years On Chapter Ten Dean Smith Double Celebration: The Referendum that did not Proceed Chapter Eleven Bridget Mackenzie Rigging the Referendum: How the Rudd Government Slanted the Playing Field for Constitutional Change: The Abuse of the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act Chapter Twelve The Honourable Gary Johns Recognition: History Yes, Culture No Contributors ii Introduction Julian Leeser The 25th Conference of The Samuel Griffith Society was held in Sydney in November 2013. The 2013 Conference was scheduled to be held in Melbourne. It was moved to Sydney. This was not, as was rumoured, because our board member, Richard Court, agreed with the former Prime Minister, Paul Keating, that “if you are not living in Sydney you are just camping out.” It was rather because the Spring racing carnival would have needlessly increased accommodation costs at that time of the year in Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Hansard No
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Hansard No. 6, 2003 MONDAY, 16 JUNE 2003 FORTIETH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—FIFTH PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE INTERNET The Journals for the Senate are available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/work/journals/index.htm Proof and Official Hansards for the House of Representatives, the Senate and committee hearings are available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard SITTING DAYS—2003 Month Date February 4, 5, 6 March 3, 4, 5, 6, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27 May 13, 14, 15 June 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26 August 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21 September 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18 October 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 27, 28, 29, 30 November 3, 4, 24, 25, 26, 27 December 1, 2, 3, 4 RADIO BROADCASTS Broadcasts of proceedings of the Parliament can be heard on the following Parliamentary and News Network radio stations, in the areas identified. CANBERRA 1440 AM SYDNEY 630 AM NEWCASTLE 1458 AM BRISBANE 936 AM MELBOURNE 1026 AM ADELAIDE 972 AM PERTH 585 AM HOBART 729 AM DARWIN 102.5 FM FORTIETH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—FIFTH PERIOD Governor-General His Excellency the Right Reverend Dr Peter Hollingworth, Companion of the Order of Australia, Officer of the Order of the British Empire Senate Officeholders President—Senator the Hon. Paul Henry Calvert Deputy President and Chairman of Committees—Senator John Joseph Hogg Temporary Chairmen of Committees—Senators Hon. Nick Bolkus, George Henry Brandis, Hedley Grant Pearson Chapman, John Clifford Cherry, Jacinta Mary Ann Collins, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Government, the US Alliance, and the Cuban Missile Crisis: a History and Policy Analysis
    The Australian Government, the US alliance, and the Cuban Missile Crisis: A history and policy analysis Laura Thompson Doctor of Philosophy College of Arts & Education Victoria University, Australia 2017 Abstract In October 1962, the world was brought to the brink of nuclear catastrophe. The Cuban Missile Crisis marked the closest the United States (US) and the Soviet Union came to military conflict that might have led to nuclear annihilation during the Cold War. This thesis investigates the Australian Government’s policy response to the crisis. In doing so, it makes an original contribution to Australian Cold War history and to the extensive literature on the crisis. The Australian Government’s policy response to the crisis is examined in the context of the Australia-US alliance. A diplomatic history, this thesis relies heavily on declassified government records from Australian and American archives. Additionally, oral history interview transcripts, audio-visual materials, Hansard, newspapers, and private collections, were consulted in order to reconstruct comprehensively Australia’s policy on this matter and the factors that shaped it. This thesis examines: Australia’s awareness of the Cuban situation; the Menzies Government’s policy on the crisis, specifically, factors it considered—and did not consider—in formulating its policy; and the Government’s immediate implementation of that policy, including the reactions of some sections of the Australian community to that policy. It demonstrates that despite limited advance notice and awareness of the Cuban situation, the Government swiftly declared support for the US in the crisis, specifically, its resolution to be presented to the United Nations Security Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communist Party of Australia and the Trade Union Movement
    Conflict in the Unions: The Communist Party of Australia, Politics and the Trade Union Movement, 1945-1960 Douglas Jordan School of Social Sciences and Psychology Faculty of Arts, Education and Human Development, Victoria University January 2011 Doctor of Philosophy Declaration “I, Douglas Jordan, declare that the PhD thesis entitled The Communist Party of Australia and the Trade Union Movement, 1945-1960, is no more than a 100,000 words in length including quotes and exclusive of tables, figures, appendices, bibliography, references and footnotes. This thesis contains no material that has been submitted previously, in whole or in part, for the award of any other degree or diploma. Except where otherwise indicated this thesis is my own work”. Signature Date: 22 July 2010 Contents Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Abbreviations v Chapter 1: Introduction and Literature Review 1 Chapter 2: Communism and the trade unions: an overview 22 Chapter 3: Peace is Union Business: The CPA and Peace Activism in the Early Cold War 70 Chapter 4: Industrial Action For Peace: The Communist Party Escalates the Campaign 119 Chapter 5: Calwells’ ‘Baltic Fascists’ Are Not Welcome: The CPA and East European Refugees 160 Chapter 6: “They will make splendid allies’ The CPA and European migrants 221 Chapter 7: ‘They have lit a fire that will – and should – blaze The CPA and the Aboriginal Rights Movement 246 Chapter 8: Conclusion 307 Bibliography 316 i Abstract This thesis examines the political activity of the Communist party of Australia (CPA) in the trade union movement between 1945 and 1960. It represents the first systematic scholarly analysis of this activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Orphans of Vietnam: a History of Intercountry Adoption Policy and Practice in Australia, 1968-1975
    Orphans of Vietnam: A History of Intercountry Adoption Policy and Practice in Australia, 1968-1975 Joshua Forkert, BA (Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of History and Politics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia. January 2012 Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... iii Declaration ................................................................................................................................ iv Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... vi Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1: A Background to Adoption in Australia .............................................................. 23 Chapter 2: Intercountry Adoption in a White Australia ......................................................... 51 Chapter 3: War, waifs and red-tape: The problem of intercountry adoption, 1968-1972 ...... 86 Chapter 4: Red tape or responsible action?: Reforming intercountry adoption, 1972- 1975 ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]