DOCSLIB.ORG

Keep a Check – Health Surveillance and Risk Assessment Food and Drink Group Wednesday 6 September 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Keep a Check – Health Surveillance and Risk Assessment Food and Drink Group Wednesday 6 September 2017 Keep a check – Health Surveillance and Risk Assessment Food and Drink Group Wednesday 6 September 2017 Julie Routledge – Occupational Health Manager Bit about me…. Worked in Occupational Health for 24 years . PG Diploma and Specialist Practitioner in Occupational Health obtained from University of Surrey . Mostly manufacturing – Weetabix, Mars Petcare, Perkins Diesel Engines and currently Greencore . Set up 2 OH services . Health Surveillance and Fit for Purpose medicals from beginning What is Health Surveillance • Health surveillance allows for early identification of ill health and helps identify any corrective action needed. • Health surveillance may be required by law if your employees are exposed to noise or vibration, solvents, fumes, dusts, biological agents and other substances hazardous to health, or work in compressed air. Source: HSE accessed 21/8/2017 http://www.hse.gov.uk/health- surveillance/index.htm So what do we need to consider Legislation for statutory requirements • Noise at work • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health • Manual Handling • Lead • Mercury • Asbestos • Vibration • Compressed Air • Radiation Fit for purpose screening What else/Fit for Purpose? Not a legal requirement but considered best practice • New starter Screening - baseline • Working Time Directives – Nightworker • Food Handlers • Drivers – Vocational and FLT etc • Working in Hot/Cold environments Health Risk Assessment • 5 steps to risk assessment • Identify the health hazard • Who is at risk from the health hazard • What are the current control methods – are they suitable to control the risk? • What more should be done – action plan, health checks etc • Monitor and review Occupational Health Assessment Types of medicals • Statutory – COSHH (EH40) – Questionnaire, lung function, skin check – Noise – Questionnaire, audiometry – Lead – Biological Monitoring - blood tests – Mercury – Biological monitoring - blood/urine tests – Asbestos – X-ray, – Compressed Air – Questionnaire, lung function – Radiation – Questionnaire, lung, skin – Hand Arm Vibration – Questionnaire (Tier 1) Fit for purpose – Drivers – Questionnaire Eye Test, – Food Handlers – skin check, symptoms, underlying condition – Extremes of Temperature - Questionnaire – Skin – Questionnaire, visual check – Nightworker - Questionnaire, – Musculoskeletal – Questionnaire, monitoring Where do we start Where do you start • Know the site • Walk the area • Health and Safety – Review risk assessments • Carry out Health Hazard Matrix • Health Hazard Audits Where to start Plan: Review risk assessments Do we have a health risk? Act: Decide who is going to carry out the health checks Do: Carry out a Determine who workplace audit requires the Health Health Risk Matrix Check Health Hazard Audit Complete screening and keep all records Monitor results and Check: Current act if required controls are they suitable and sufficient? Recall - frequency Do I need to carry out health checks? AREA Matrix Hazard Health PRODUCTION Assessed By___________________________ Assessed Role/Task Assessment MatrixAssessment Health Hazard Risk Health HazardRisk ________________________________ OPERATIVE X Noise X Substance Hazardous to Health Welding Confined Space Driving – Fork Lift, HGV, LGV, Pallet Truck etc Vibrating Tools Date Date ______________________________________ SUB AREA X Musculoskeletal Risk -WRULD _____________________________________________ Display Screen Equipment Ultra Violet Light/Electromagnetic field X Night Shift Psychological Risk Whole body Vibration Exposure to Lead, asbestos, mercury Working at Height Lone Working X Thermal - Working in Hot/Cold Biological Hazards Radiation Vulnerable Person X Food Handling Health Hazard Audit Section A: Area Assessment Summary Factory Factory 1 Area High Care Line Sub area assessed: assessed: Ops Assessed by: Julie Routledge Shift times: 7 day a week manufacturing – 2200 to 16.30 Health hazard identified Control measures Medical Screening Intervention 1. Exposure to Noise Noise survey, Hearing protection zones, noise action Audiometry as a baseline on joining Greencore group looking to reduce noise levels at source and then every 2 years thereafter 2, Work related upper limb Suitable rest and recovery, rest breaks, manual Musculoskeletal Assessment disorders handling training, Risk assessment, rotation of tasks Working in a cold environment Wearing of layers of clothing, gloves provided, rest General Health Questionnaire periods, Occupational Health Assessment 3, Shift Work Redeployment opportunities to move to days if Night worker Assessment every 2 years requested 4. Demand of Role – keeping Management supervision, suitable rest and recovery None required monitor during medical up with line speed/production surveillance run 5. Exposure to food contact – Assess to Occupational Health, gloves are provided, Food Handlers medical every 2 years – skin risk of allergy, hand washing – soaps and detergents suitable for food manufacturing, check risk of dermatitis moisturiser provided 6. Quality Monitors – Taste Occupational Health Assessment Food Handlers medical every 2 years Panel – risk of food allergy Are there any considerations to this area for vulnerable employees – including but not exclusive to pregnancy/young persons – Pregnancy risk assessment required to consider static standing, shift work and Only for Quality Monitors – Taste panel Comments: Rotation of tasks is key in reducing the impact of work related upper limb disorders Overall Health Risk Rating Low Risk as long as control measures are observed Date 23 May 2017 Review Date May 2020 Health Hazard Audit Occupational Health Health Hazard Assessment Section B: Health Hazard breakdown Do any of the following occupational health hazards exist? 1.Physical hazards Is there a risk of/from Yes/No Comments/current controls Working at height Vehicular/FLT Confined space Machinery/mechanical Vibration – use of power tools, whole body vibration Lone working Noise Radiation Musculoskeletal Injury – WRULD Back Injury Ergonomics – is the area ergonomically designed? Thermal hazards such as: heat (direct/radiated) humidity Cold/chill store Any other physical hazards? 2. Chemical hazards Do any of the following hazards Yes/No Comments/current controls – exist in this area? Dusts/powders Fumes Gases/vapour Aerosol/mists Liquids Cleaning agents Health Hazard Audit 3. Biological hazards Routine exposure to biohazards. If Yes/No Comments/current controls yes, list 4. Manual Handling/Ergonomic hazards Is there a risk from Manual Comments/current controls Handling or Ergonomics? Is the risk: LOW MEDIUM HIGH If the risk is med-high has a manual handling risk assessment been carried out? If Yes is it suitable and sufficient to control the risk? Comments: 5. Psychological hazards Do any psychological hazards Comments/current controls exist? If yes list Shift Work Lean crewing, future changes Are there any concerns for WRS? Additional comments: Signature Date Health Hazard Audits Overall Risk Assessment Rating Severity – 2 x Likelihood 1 = 2 Low risk SEVERITY OF HEALTH EFFECT Taking into account what is Not severe Severe (off work for 3 days or Very severe (long term illness) known so far, how severe a more) health effect could working in Score 3 this area have on personnel? Score 1 Score 2 LIKELIHOOD OF OCCURANCE Having considered the control Unlikely Likely Highly likely measures, what is the likelihood of personnel developing a health risk? Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 RISK RATING = SEVERITY x LIKELIHOOD ENTER RISK RATING HERE: 2 Action: . A risk rating of 1 or 2 indicates that existing management arrangements are adequate and the risk is LOW . A risk rating of 3 or 4 indicates that a review of current arrangements should take place and the risk is MEDIUM and changes made within 4 weeks . A risk rating of 6 or 9 indicates that the current arrangements for health protection are inadequate and that urgent action should be taken to remedy the situation and the risk is HIGH Health Task sheet and surveillance programme Health Risk Risk Who may require this Paperwork Medical Required Criteria/Standard Frequency Required New Starter LOW All employees General Health Baseline audio, spirometry, Refer to OHA if any underlying health Within 12 weeks of commencing Questionnaire skin assessment, Ishihara condition that may cause an impact employment. 4 weeks for all food Food Handler Plates on their ability to carry out their role handlers Questionnaire Exposure to HIGH Engineers, Ultra Sonic Cutters, Audiometry Audiometry Refer to GP/OHA if CAT 3 At baseline then every 2 years. Noise Machine Minders, tray wash, porters, Questionnaire More frequent if results show dispatch or any employee where Any CAT 2 - Warning advise to wear vulnerability (CAT 2, CAT 3) noise levels are above 85 dB (A) hearing protection Annual for Engineers Exposure to HIGH Hygiene, Engineers, Welders, Yard, Respiratory and Spirometry and skin Refer to OHA if Spirometry showing Welders and Dries/Spices - On Substances Diesel Tank, Dries Room Skin assessment restriction or obstruction or any commencing employment, at 12 Hazardous to Questionnaire symptoms of rhinitis (exc. hayfever) weeks, 24 weeks at 1 year then health annually thereafter. All others on commencing employment and annually thereafter Food Handler LOW All employees who come into contact Food Handler Skin examination, nail check, Refer to OHA if any underlying health Every 2 years with unsealed/open food within low Questionnaire dental check. condition that may cause an impact or high care
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tag out a Shipyard Hazard Prevention Course
    Workshop Objectives At the completion of this workshop it is expected that all trainees will pass a quiz, have the ability to identify energy hazards and follow both OSHA and NAVSEA safety procedures associated with: Electrical Hazards Non-Electrical Energy Hazards Lockout - Tag out 11 OSHA 1915.89 SUBPART F Control of Hazardous Energy -Lock-out/ Tags Plus This CFR allows specific exemptions for shipboard tag-outs when Navy Ship’s Force personnel serve as the lockout/tags-plus coordinator and maintain control of the machinery per the Navy’s Tag Out User Manual (TUM). Note to paragraph (c)(4) of this section: When the Navy ship's force maintains control of the machinery, equipment, or systems on a vessel and has implemented such additional measures it determines are necessary, the provisions of paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section shall not apply, provided that the employer complies with the verification procedures in paragraph (g) of this section. Note to paragraph (c)(7) of this section: When the Navy ship's force serves as the lockout/tags-plus coordinator and maintains control of the lockout/tags-plus log, the employer will be in compliance with the requirements in paragraph (c)(7) of this section when coordination between the ship's force and the employer occurs to ensure that applicable lockout/tags-plus procedures are followed and documented. 2 Note to paragraph (e) of this section: When the Navy ship's force shuts down any machinery, equipment, or system, and relieves, disconnects, restrains, or otherwise renders safe all potentially hazardous energy that is connected to the machinery, equipment, or system, the employer will be in compliance with the requirements in paragraph (e) of this section when the employer's authorized employee verifies that the machinery, equipment, or system being serviced has been properly shut down, isolated, and deenergized.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Identification
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Issuing Date: 13-Aug-2020 Revision date 13-Aug-2020 Revision Number 1 1. IDENTIFICATION Product Name Tide PODS Spring Meadow Product Identifier 91943772_RET_NG Product Type: Finished Product - Retail Recommended use Detergent. Restrictions on use Use only as directed on label. Synonyms C-91943772-005 Details of the supplier of the safety PROCTER & GAMBLE - Fabric and Home Care Division data sheet Ivorydale Technical Centre 5289 Spring Grove Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45217-1087 USA Procter & Gamble Inc. P.O. Box 355, Station A Toronto, ON M5W 1C5 1-800-331-3774 E-mail Address [email protected] Emergency Telephone Transportation (24 HR) CHEMTREC - 1-800-424-9300 (U.S./ Canada) or 1-703-527-3887 Mexico toll free in country: 800-681-9531 2. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION "Consumer Products", as defined by the US Consumer Product Safety Act and which are used as intended (typical consumer duration and frequency), are exempt from the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). This SDS is being provided as a courtesy to help assist in the safe handling and proper use of the product. This product is classified under 29CFR 1910.1200(d) and the Canadian Hazardous Products Regulation as follows:. Hazard Category Acute toxicity - Oral Category 4 Eye Damage / Irritation Category 2B Signal word Warning Hazard statements Harmful if swallowed Causes eye irritation Hazard pictograms 91943772_RET_NG - Tide PODS Spring Meadow Revision date 13-Aug-2020 Precautionary Statements Keep container tightly closed Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces. — No smoking Wash hands thoroughly after handling Precautionary Statements - In case of fire: Use water, CO2, dry chemical, or foam for extinction Response IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Incidents During Anaesthesia a Small Percentage of Apparently Routine Anaesthetics Will End in an Anticipated Or Unforeseen Acute Incident
    Acute incidents during anaesthesia A small percentage of apparently routine anaesthetics will end in an anticipated or unforeseen acute incident. Edwin W Turton, MB ChB, Dip Pec (SA), DA (SA), MMed Anes, FCA (SA) Head of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Bloemfontein Hospitals Complex, Department of Anaesthesiology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein Dr Edwin Turton worked as a clinical fellow in cardiac anaesthesia at Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK, in 2009. His current fields of interest are adult and paediatric cardiac anaesthesia and peri-operative echocardiography, and focussed assessment through echocardiography in emergency care. Correspondence to: E W Turton ([email protected]) Anaesthesia is uneventful in the majority Although anaesthesia is a very well- • Antibiotics (2.6%) of cases but in a small percentage of controlled and governed discipline, acute • Benzodiazepines (2%) routine and emergency cases there will incidents do occur. Incidents can occur • Opioids (1.7%) be an anticipated or an unforeseen acute during induction, maintenance and • Other agents (e.g. radio contrast media) incident. These incidents need immediate emergence from anaesthesia. (2.5%). theoretical knowledge and clinical skills to be managed effectively and to The following acute critical incidents are Treatment and management prevent further morbidity and mortality. discussed in this article: • Stop administration of all suspected Therefore all providers of anaesthesia, • Anaphylaxis agents. at different levels of experience, should • Aspiration • Call for help. be able to provide basic and advanced • Laryngospasm • Airway must be secured and 100% cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).1 • High or total (complete) spinal blocks in oxygen given, and ensure adequate obstetric anaesthesia. ventilation. The first death associated with an anaesthetic • Intravenous or intramuscular adrenaline was reported in 1848 in the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment
    WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment Oregon OSHA Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment About this guide “Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment” is an Oregon OSHA Standards and Technical Resources Section publication. Piracy notice Reprinting, excerpting, or plagiarizing this publication is fine with us as long as it’s not for profit! Please inform Oregon OSHA of your intention as a courtesy. Table of contents What is a PPE hazard assessment ............................................... 2 Why should you do a PPE hazard assessment? .................................. 2 What are Oregon OSHA’s requirements for PPE hazard assessments? ........... 3 Oregon OSHA’s hazard assessment rules ....................................... 3 When is PPE necessary? ........................................................ 4 What types of PPE may be necessary? .......................................... 5 Table 1: Types of PPE ........................................................... 5 How to do a PPE hazard assessment ............................................ 8 Do a baseline survey to identify workplace hazards. 8 Evaluate your employees’ exposures to each hazard identified in the baseline survey ...............................................9 Document your hazard assessment ...................................................10 Do regular workplace inspections ....................................................11 What is a PPE hazard assessment A personal protective equipment (PPE) hazard assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
    Risk Assessment Guidance The assessor can assign values for the hazard severity (a) and likelihood of occurrence (b) (taking into account the frequency and duration of exposure) on a scale of 1 to 5, then multiply them together to give the rating band: Hazard Severity (a) Likelihood of Occurrence (b) 1 – Trivial (eg discomfort, slight bruising, self-help recovery) 1 – Remote (almost never) 2 – Minor (eg small cut, abrasion, basic first aid need) 2 – Unlikely (occurs rarely) 3 – Moderate (eg strain, sprain, incapacitation > 3 days) 3 – Possible (could occur, but uncommon) 4 – Serious (eg fracture, hospitalisation >24 hrs, incapacitation >4 4 – Likely (recurrent but not frequent) weeks) 5 – Very likely (occurs frequently) 5 – Fatal (single or multiple) The risk rating (high, medium or low) indicates the level of response required to be taken when designing the action plan. Trivial Minor Moderate Serious Fatal Rating Bands (a x b) Remote 1 2 3 4 5 LOW RISK MEDIUM RISK HIGH RISK (1 – 8) (9 - 12) (15 - 25) Unlikely 2 4 6 8 10 Continue, but Continue, but -STOP THE Possible review implement ACTIVITY- 3 6 9 12 15 periodically to additional Identify new ensure controls reasonably controls. Activity Likely remain effective practicable must not controls where 4 8 12 16 20 proceed until possible and risks are Very monitor regularly reduced to a low likely 5 10 15 20 25 or medium level 1 Risk Assessments There are a number of explanations needed in order to understand the process and the form used in this example: HAZARD: Anything that has the potential to cause harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Permits-To-Work in the Process Industries
    SYMPOSIUM SERIES NO. 151 # 2006 IChemE PERMITS-TO-WORK IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES John Gould Environmental Resources Management, Suite 8.01, 8 Exchange Quay, Manchester M5 3EJ; [email protected] The paper presents the collective results from a number of Safety Management System audits. The audit protocol is based on the Health and Safety Executive pub- lication ‘Successful health and safety management’ and takes into account formal (written) and informal procedures as well as their implementation. Focused on permit-to-work systems, these have shown a number of common failings. The most common failure in implementing a permit-to-work system is the issue of too many permits. However, the audit protocol considers the whole risk control system. The failure to ‘close’ the management loop with an effective regular review process is the largest obstacle to an effective permit system. INTRODUCTION ‘Permits save lives – give them proper attention’. This is a startling statement made by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in its free leaflet IND(G) 98 (Rev 3) PTW systems. The leaflet goes on to state that two thirds of all accidents in the chemical industry are main- tenance related, with the permit-to-work (PTW) failures being the largest single cause. Given these facts, it comes as no surprise that PTW systems are a key part in the provision of a safe working environment. Over the past four years Environmental Resources Management (ERM) has been auditing PTW systems as part of its key risk control systems audits. Numerous systems have been evaluated from a wide rage of industries, covering personal care products man- ufacturing to refinery operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Data and Information
    Exposure Data and Information NOAA Office for Coastal Management coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/tools/flood-exposure.html The following data were used in the Coastal Flood Exposure Mapper and in map services available for use in ArcGIS Online or other online mapping platforms. See ESRI’s ArcGIS Online Tutorial for instructions on using map services. Hazards Exposure Authoritative Name Description Map Service Significance Source Spatial extents of multiple flood hazard data sets combined. Flood hazard data sets include high tide flooding, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood Provides a quick data (V zones, A zones, and 500- Coastal Coastal Flood visual Coastal Flood year zones treated as individual Flood Hazard Exposure assessment of Hazard layers), storm surge inundation for Composite Mapper areas most Composite category 1, 2, and 3 hurricanes Map Service prone to flood (from FEMA Hurricane Evacuation hazard events. Studies), sea level rise scenarios for 1, 2, and 3 feet above mean higher high water (MHHW), and tsunami run-up zones where available. Page 1 of 7 Authoritative Name Description Map Service Significance Source Areas that flood when coastal flood warning thresholds are exceeded. Derived from the flood frequency layer within the Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Impacts Viewer. High Tide Sea Level Rise Areas subject to High Tide Flooding Viewer high tide Flooding For islands in the Caribbean and Map Service flooding. Pacific, the high tide flooding zones were mapped based on statistical analysis of water level observations at tidal stations in those areas. Digital FEMA flood data. The data represent the digital riverine and coastal flood zones available as of FEMA Flood FEMA’s Map FEMA Flood Areas at risk October 2017 and are a Zones Map Service Center Zones from flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Risk Management Guide
    OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE 2020 Last Updated 02/26/2020 RISK MANAGEMENT COUNCIL IN COOPERATION WITH THE OFFICE OF SAFETY & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH and THE NATIONAL AVIATION SAFETY COUNCIL Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. i Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 What is Operational Risk Management? ................................................................................................................... 1 The Terminology of ORM ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Principles of ORM Application ........................................................................................................................................... 6 The Five-Step ORM Process ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Step 1: Identify Hazards ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Developing the Safety Risk Management Component of a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan
    Guide to Developing the Safety Risk Management Component of a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Overview The Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) regulation (49 C.F.R. Part 673) requires certain operators of public transportation systems that are recipients or subrecipients of FTA grant funds to develop Agency Safety Plans (ASP) including the processes and procedures necessary for implementing Safety Management Systems (SMS). Safety Risk Management (SRM) is one of the four SMS components. Each eligible transit operator must have an approved ASP meeting the regulation requirements by July 20, 2020. Safety Risk Management The SRM process requires understanding the differences between hazards, events, and potential consequences. SRM is an essential process within a transit The Sample SRM Definitions Checklist can support agencies agency’s SMS for identifying hazards and analyzing, as- with understanding and distinguishing between these sessing, and mitigating safety risk. Key terms, as de- terms when considering safety concerns and to help ad- fined in Part 673, include: dress Part 673 requirements while developing the SRM • Event–any accident, incident, or occurrence. section of their ASP. • Hazard–any real or potential condition that can cause injury, illness, or death; damage to or loss of the facilities, equipment, rolling stock, or infra- structure of a public transportation system; or damage to the environment. • Risk–composite of predicted severity and likeli- hood of the potential effect of a hazard. • Risk Mitigation–method(s) to eliminate or re- duce the effects of hazards. Sample SRM Definitions Checklist The following is not defined in Part 673. However, transit Part 673 requires transit agencies to develop and imple- agencies may choose to derive a definition from other text ment an SRM process for all elements of its public provided in Part 673, such as: transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • TOXICOLOGY and EXPOSURE GUIDELINES ______(For Assistance, Please Contact EHS at (402) 472-4925, Or Visit Our Web Site At
    (Revised 1/03) TOXICOLOGY AND EXPOSURE GUIDELINES ______________________________________________________________________ (For assistance, please contact EHS at (402) 472-4925, or visit our web site at http://ehs.unl.edu/) "All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy." This early observation concerning the toxicity of chemicals was made by Paracelsus (1493- 1541). The classic connotation of toxicology was "the science of poisons." Since that time, the science has expanded to encompass several disciplines. Toxicology is the study of the interaction between chemical agents and biological systems. While the subject of toxicology is quite complex, it is necessary to understand the basic concepts in order to make logical decisions concerning the protection of personnel from toxic injuries. Toxicity can be defined as the relative ability of a substance to cause adverse effects in living organisms. This "relative ability is dependent upon several conditions. As Paracelsus suggests, the quantity or the dose of the substance determines whether the effects of the chemical are toxic, nontoxic or beneficial. In addition to dose, other factors may also influence the toxicity of the compound such as the route of entry, duration and frequency of exposure, variations between different species (interspecies) and variations among members of the same species (intraspecies). To apply these principles to hazardous materials response, the routes by which chemicals enter the human body will be considered first. Knowledge of these routes will support the selection of personal protective equipment and the development of safety plans. The second section deals with dose-response relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Hazards
    FINDING HAZARDS OSHA 11 Finding Hazards 1 Osha 11 Finding Hazards 2 FINDING HAZARDS Learning Objectives By the end of this lesson, students will be able to: • Define the term “job hazard” • Identify a variety of health and safety hazards found at typical worksites where young people are employed. • Locate various types of hazards in an actual workplace. Time Needed: 45 Minutes Materials Needed • Flipchart Paper • Markers (5 colors per student group) • PowerPoint Slides: #1: Job Hazards #2: Sample Hazard Map #3: Finding Hazards: Key Points • Appendix A handouts (Optional) Preparing To Teach This Lesson Before you present this lesson: 1. Obtain a flipchart and markers or use a chalkboard and chalk. 2. Locate slides #1-3 on your CD and review them. If necessary, copy onto transparencies. 3. For the Hazard Mapping activity, you will need flipchart paper and a set of five colored markers (black, red, green, blue, orange) for each small group. Detailed Instructor’s Notes A. Introduction: What is a job hazard? (15 minutes) 1. Remind the class that a job hazard is anything at work that can hurt you, either physically or mentally. Explain that some job hazards are very obvious, but others are not. In order to be better prepared to be safe on the job, it is necessary to be able to identify different types of hazards. Tell the class that hazards can be divided into four categories. Write the categories across the top of a piece of flipchart paper and show PowerPoint Slide #1, Job Hazards. • Safety hazards can cause immediate accidents and injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Assessment of Potential Storm Tide Inundation at Southeast China
    Hazard assessment of potential storm tide inundation at Southeast China coast Bingchuan Nie 1,2, Qingyong Wuxi 3,4, Jiachun Li 3,4, and Feng Xu1,2 1 School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China 2 Beijing’s Key Laboratory of Structural Wind Engineering and Urban Wind Environment, Beijing 100044, China 3 Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 4 School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Abstract Hazard assessment of storm tide is addressed for Southeast China coast in this study. In particular, we pay attention to the scarcely discussed issue of storm tide inundation. The main procedures of hazard assessment are: 1) non-stationary tropical cyclone intensification (TCI) and sea level rise (SLR) for the study area are analyzed based on the long-term historical database; 2) four typical scenarios of storm tide are examined using the surge-tide-wave coupled hydrodynamic model; 3) the potential inundated regions are identified on the GIS platform. The distributions of water elevation show that high water elevation tends to occur in the bays and around the estuaries. Without considering the impacts of TCI and SLR, the maximal water elevations caused by the typhoon wind of 100-year recurrence period can reach as high as 6.06 m, 5.82 m and 5.67 m around Aojiang, Feiyunjiang and Oujiang river estuaries, respectively. In this circumstance, about 533 km2 area is under the threat of storm tide inundation. TCI and SLR due to climate change can further deteriorate the situation and enhance the risk of inundation there.
    [Show full text]