Comparison of Spontaneous and Adaptive Mutation Spectra in Yeast
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
© Indian Academy of Sciences Special section: Stationary-phase mutations in microorganisms Comparison of spontaneous and adaptive mutation spectra in yeast CHRISTOPHER N. GREENE 1 and SUE JINKS-ROBERTSON 1,2,* 1 Graduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, and 2 Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Abstract Adaptive mutations occur in nongrowing populations of cells to overcome strong, nonlethal selection conditions. Several models have been proposed for the molecular mechanism(s) for this phenomenon in Escherichia coli, but the mechanisms involved in adaptive mutagenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are largely unknown. We present here a comparison of the mutational spectra of spontaneous and adaptive frameshift reversion events in yeast. In contrast to results from E. coli, we find that the mutational spectrum of adaptive mutations in S. cerevisiae is not similar to that seen in mismatch repair defective cells, but rather resembles the spontaneous mutational events that occur during normal growth. [Greene C. N. and Jinks-Robertson S. 1999 Comparisonof spontaneous and adaptive mutation spectra in yeast. J. Genet. 78, 51-55] Introduction Stahl (1988) proposed that the adaptive nature of muta- tional events occurring under starvation conditions could be The classic experiments of Luria and Delbriick (1943) and explained by the inherently biased nature of the bacterial Lederberg and Lederberg (1952) demonstrated that mutations mismatch repair (MMR) system. During the repair of in bacterial cells occur prior to exposure to a selective agent. mismatches generated during DNA synthesis, the MMR Such 'spontaneous' mutations presumably reflect random system specifically targets the newly synthesized strand errors made during DNA synthesis and hence occur without (rather than the strand used as a template for DNA synthesis) regard to their possible utility. Although these experiments for removal and repair, thus preventing the propagation of demonstrated the occurrence of spontaneous mutation events, errors. Stahl proposed that the MMR machinery might work they utihzed a lethal selection scheme that precluded the less efficiently under starvation conditions (alternatively, detection of mutational events that might be occurring after DNA polymerases might be more error prone under starva- exposure to the selective agent. Cairns et al. (1988) first tion conditions), thus allowing time for the cell to assess the documented the accumulation of mutations in nondividing potential usefulness of a mutational intermediate. Mis- bacterial cells in an apparent response to a selective agent. matches thus could be considered transient mutations that These growth-independent mutations were originally termed either are fLxed by DNA replication, or are removed by the 'directed' mutations, a name that reflected a hypothetical MMR machinery. If incorporation of a mutation into the reverse flow of information from protein to gene. Such a transcribed strand of a gene whose function is necessary to reverse flow of information was subsequently discounted restore growth results in the production of a functional gene (Foster and Cairns 1992), and the mutations occurring in product, then growth would ensue and the mutation would nongrowing cells are generally referred to as 'adaptive' be fixed in the genome. If, however, a mutation occurs that mutations. The hallmark of the adaptive-mutation process is does not result in a functional gene product, or occurs in a the accumulation of mutations that specifically restore a gene whose product is irrelevant to growth restoration, then growth phenotype; mutations irrelevant to growth restoration the mutation would be removed by the MMR machinery. do not accumulate (Drake 1991; Foster 1993; Hall 1998). The most intensely studied system for adaptive mutation is reversion of the F'-bome lacI33-lacZ +1 frameshift allele * For correspondence. E-mail: [email protected]. of Escherichia coli in response to lactose exposure (Cairns Keywords. adaptive; mutation; frameshift; yeast. Journal of Genetics, Vol. 78, No. 1, April 1999 51 Christopher IV. Greene and Sue Jinks-Robertson and Foster 1991; Foster 1998). The mechanism for adaptive with the unbiased repair of mismatches that arise in recom- reversion of this allele is qualitatively different from growth- bination intermediates (Petes et al. 1991). To gain further dependent, spontaneous reversion in several respects. First, insight into the molecular mechanism(s) involved in adap- the adaptive frameshift mutations are dependent on bacterial tive mutation in yeast, we have compared the sequence recombination functions whereas spontaneous mutations are spectra of spontaneous (growth-dependent) and adaptive not (Cairns and Foster 1991; Foster 1993; Harris et al. 1994; (growth-independent) frameshift mutations at the LYS2 Foster and Trimarchi 1995a). In addition, adaptive events locus. require the expression of F-factor conjugative functions (Foster and Trimarchi 1995a; Galitski and Roth 1995; Radicella et aL 1995), although the physical act of con- Materials and methods jugation itself is not necessary (Foster and Trimarchi 1995b). Finally, the adaptive reversion spectrum is distinct from that Isolation of Lys + revertants: Strain S JR159 (MATs leu2 ura3 of spontaneous events, and is instead very similar to the trplam ade2 pCYCl-lys2ABgl; see Steele and Jinks- spontaneous reversion spectrum obtained in MMR-deficient Robertson 1992) was grown nonselectively on YPD cells. The adaptive events are almost exclusively one-base- medium (1% yeast extract, 2% Bacto-peptone, 2% dextrose; pair deletions in homopolymer runs, whereas the sponta- 2% agar for plates). Two-day-old colonies were excised neous events are very heterogeneous, consisting of a variety from YPD plates and individually grown overnight in 5 ml of deletions, additions and complex frameshifts (Foster and of liquid YPD. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, Trimarchi 1994; Rosenberg et al. 1994). These data suggest washed with sterile water, and plated on lysine-deficient that a deficiency in the E. coli MMR system may be selective medium (SC-lys medium; see Sherman 1991) at a important in the generation of adaptive mutation events. In density of 108 cells per plate. Lys+ revertants appearing on addition, the major replicative polymerase (DNA polymer- the second day after selective plating were assumed to ase III) has been implicated in the generation of mutations contain spontaneous mutations that occurred during the that accumulate under starvation conditions (Foster et al. nonselective growth period ('early' revertants). Lys + 1995; Harris et al. 1997). Although early work indicated colonies making their initial appearance on days 5-7 after that the only starvation-associated mutations were those that selective plating ('late' revertants) were assumed to contain restored a growth phenotype, more recent studies have adaptive mutations that occurred after selective plating. To demonstrated that additional, nonselected mutations occur ensure independence of all revertants analysed, only a single as well, but at a lower rate (Foster 1997; Torkelson et al. early and a single late revertant were isolated from each 1997). The bacterial data are most consistent with either a independent overnight culture. All revertants were purified 'hypermutational state' model (Boe 1990; Hall 1990), a nonselectively on YPD medium prior to molecular analysis. recombination-based model incorporating F-factor replica- tion (Kuzminov 1995), or a gene amplification model DNA sequence analysis: Cells were grown to saturation in 2 requiring residual function of the allele that needs to be ml YPD medium, and total genomic DNA was prepared by adaptively reverted (Andersson et al. 1998). glass bead lysis (Hoffman and Winston 1987). DNA was In addition to the well-studied bacterial events, adaptive resuspended in a final volume of 100 ktl, and 0.5 pl was used mutations have also been documented in the yeast Saccha- as a template in a 20-ktl PCR reaction. A 900-bp region romyces cerevisiae (Hail 1992; Steele and Jinks-Robertson containing the lys2ABgl reversion window was amplified 1992; Baranowska et al. 1995; Heidenreich and Winters- using primers 5t-GTAACCGGTGACGATGAT-3/ (forward) berger 1997, 1998; Storchova et al. 1998). The molecular and 5'-CCAATTGTCCAGCAGCTC-3t (reverse). Five ~tl of mechanisms involved in adaptive mutagenesis in yeast have the PCR reaction was treated with one unit each of exonu- not been characterized in detail although some genetic data clease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase to remove the are available. It has been reported that a mutator allele of primers and dNTPs. Standard dideoxynucleotide sequen- DNA polymerase d~ (cdc2-1) increases the rate of both cing was performed directly without further purification spontaneous and adaptive reversion events (Baranowska using 35S-dCTP, Sequenase (USB) and an internal primer et al. 1995) and that elimination of the RAD6 DNA repair (5r-CGCAACAATGGTTACTCT-31). gene has a similar effect (Storchova et aL 1998). These observations suggest the involvement of DNA repair path- ways in the generation of adaptive mutations. In addition, Results and discussion we reported that, although mutations leading to a Lys+ A system for detecting frameshift events phenotype are adaptive and occur only during lysine starva- tion, recombination events producing a Lys+ phenotype The 4.2-kb LYS2 locus contains a single BglII restriction occur under