Government and Opposition (2021), 56, 615–639 doi:10.1017/gov.2020.4 . ARTICLE Unravelling the New Plebiscitary Democracy: Towards a Research Agenda Frank Hendriks* https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Tilburg University, Department of Public Law and Governance, Tilburg, the Netherlands *Corresponding author. Email:
[email protected] (Received 2 August 2019; revised 25 November 2019; accepted 17 January 2020; first published online 20 March 2020) Abstract Pushed by technological, cultural and related political drivers, a ‘new plebiscitary democ- racy’ is emerging which challenges established electoral democracy as well as variants of deliberative democracy. The new plebiscitary democracy reinvents and radicalizes longer-existing methods (initiative, referendum, recall, primary, petition, poll) with new tools and applications (mostly digital). It comes with a comparatively thin conceptualiza- tion of democracy, invoking the bare notion of a demos whose aggregated will is to steer actors and issues in public governance in a straight majoritarian way. In addition to unrav- , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at elling the reinvented logic of plebiscitary democracy in conceptual terms, this article fleshes out an empirically informed matrix of emerging formats, distinguishing between votations that are ‘political-leader’ and ‘public-issue’ oriented on the one hand, and ‘inside-out’ and ‘outside-in’ initiated on the other hand. Relatedly, it proposes an agenda for systematic research into the various guises, drivers and implications of the new plebis- citary democracy. Finally, it reflects on possible objections to the argumentation. 28 Sep 2021 at 17:33:14 , on Keywords: new plebiscitary democracy; democratic transformation; electronic voting; digital democracy; populism Vox populi redux 170.106.35.229 In May 2018, the Spanish left-wing political party Podemos organized a digital party referendum, as they called it, on its leadership.