DOCSLIB.ORG

2 - Bloor-Danforth SERVICE: SUNDAY SCHEDULE NO: 2163-1 PAGE: 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: DANFORTH REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Jan 03 to Feb 13, 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 - Bloor-Danforth SERVICE: SUNDAY SCHEDULE NO: 2163-1 PAGE: 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: DANFORTH REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Jan 03 to Feb 13, 2021 ROUTE: 2 - Bloor-Danforth SERVICE: SUNDAY SCHEDULE NO: 2163-1 PAGE: 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: DANFORTH REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Jan 03 to Feb 13, 2021 SERVICE PLANNING-RUN GUIDE SAFE OPERATION TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER TIMES SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DOWN FROM: -- KIPLING STATION KE Keele Stn. DO DONLANDS STATION GW GREENWOOD STATION EB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ UP FROM: -- KENNEDY STATION GR GREENWOOD STATION WB DO DONLANDS STATION KE Keele Stn. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 853a|1040a|1227p| 215p| 402p| 549p| 726p| 903p|1041p|1218x| 155x| | | | | | 201 | UP | 756a| 800a| 947a|1134a| 121p| 308p| 455p| 637p| 815p| 952p|1129p| 107x| 206x| 209x| | | | |18:13 | |KP | | | | | | | | | | | |KE |KL | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 858a|1045a|1232p| 219p| 406p| 553p| 731p| 908p|1046p|1223x| 200x| | | | | | 202 | UP | 817a| 818a| 952a|1139a| 126p| 313p| 500p| 642p| 820p| 957p|1134p| 112x| 211x| 213x| | | | |17:56 | |GY |DO | | | | | | | | | | |KE |KL | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 903a|1050a|1237p| 224p| 411p| 557p| 736p| 913p|1050p|1228x| 205x| | | | | | 203 | UP | 806a| 810a| 957a|1144a| 131p| 318p| 505p| 647p| 824p|1002p|1139p| 116x| 216x| 218x| | | | |18:12 | |K1 | | | | | | | | | | | |KE |KL | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Z2 | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 908a|1055a|1242p| 229p| 416p| 601p| 741p| 918p|1055p|1233x| 207x| 212x| | | | | 204 | UP | 827a| 828a|1001a|1149a| 136p| 323p| 510p| 652p| 829p|1007p|1144p| 121x| | | | | | |17:45 | |GY |DO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | | | | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 913a|1100a|1247p| 234p| 421p| 605p| 705p| 708p| | | | | | | | | 205 | UP | 816a| 819a|1006a|1153a| 140p| 328p| 515p| 653p| | | | | | | | | | |10:52 | |K2 | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |GY |GW | | | | | | | | | | | |Z1 | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 804a| 807a| 918a|1105a|1252p| 239p| 426p| 609p| 745p| 923p|1100p|1237x| 211x| 217x| | | | | 206 | UP | | 824a|1011a|1158a| 145p| 332p| 519p| 657p| 834p|1011p|1149p| 126x| | | | | | |18:13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ROUTE: 2 - Bloor-Danforth SERVICE: SUNDAY SCHEDULE NO: 2163-1 PAGE: 2 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: DANFORTH REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Jan 03 to Feb 13, 2021 SERVICE PLANNING-RUN GUIDE SAFE OPERATION TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER TIMES SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DOWN FROM: -- KIPLING STATION KE Keele Stn. DO DONLANDS STATION GW GREENWOOD STATION EB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ UP FROM: -- KENNEDY STATION GR GREENWOOD STATION WB DO DONLANDS STATION KE Keele Stn. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |GY |GW | | | | | | | | | | | |ZP | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 809a| 812a| 923a|1110a|1257p| 244p| 431p| 613p| 750p| 928p|1105p|1242x| 216x| 222x| | | | | 207 | UP | | 829a|1016a|1203p| 150p| 337p| 524p| 702p| 839p|1016p|1154p| 131x| | | | | | |18:13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | B | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |GY |GW | | | | | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 814a| 817a| 927a|1114a| 102p| 249p| 436p| 618p| 755p| 933p|1110p|1247x| 148x| 151x| | | | | 208 | UP | | 834a|1021a|1208p| 155p| 342p| 529p| 707p| 844p|1021p|1159p| 136x| | | | | | |17:37 | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |GY |GW | | | | | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 819a| 821a| 932a|1119a| 106p| 253p| 441p| 623p| 800p| 937p|1115p|1252x| 152x| 156x| | | | | 209 | UP | | 839a|1026a|1213p| 200p| 347p| 534p| 711p| 849p|1026p|1203x| 141x| | | | | | |17:37 | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |GY |GW | | | | | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 824a| 826a| 937a|1124a| 111p| 258p| 445p| 628p| 805p| 942p|1120p|1257x| 157x| 200x| | | | | 210 | UP | | 844a|1031a|1218p| 205p| 352p| 539p| 716p| 854p|1031p|1208x| 146x| | | | | | |17:36 | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |GY |GW | | | | | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 829a| 831a| 942a|1129a| 116p| 303p| 450p| 632p| 810p| 947p|1124p| 102x| 202x| 205x| | | | | 211 | UP | | 848a|1036a|1223p| 210p| 357p| 544p| 721p| 858p|1036p|1213x| 150x| | | | | | |17:36 | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |ZP | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 756a| 800a| 947a|1134a| 121p| 308p| 455p| 557p| 600p| | | | | | | | | | 212 | UP | | 853a|1040a|1227p| 215p| 402p| 545p| | | | | | | | | | | |10:04 | | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ROUTE: 2 - Bloor-Danforth SERVICE: SUNDAY SCHEDULE NO: 2163-1 PAGE: 3 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: DANFORTH REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Jan 03 to Feb 13, 2021 SERVICE PLANNING-RUN GUIDE SAFE OPERATION TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER TIMES SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DOWN FROM: -- KIPLING STATION KE Keele Stn. DO DONLANDS STATION GW GREENWOOD STATION EB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ UP FROM: -- KENNEDY STATION GR GREENWOOD STATION WB DO DONLANDS STATION KE Keele Stn. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |GY |GW | | | | | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 838a| 841a| 952a|1139a| 126p| 313p| 500p| 637p| 815p| 952p|1129p| 107x| 207x| 211x| | | | | 213 | UP | | 858a|1045a|1232p| 219p| 406p| 549p| 726p| 903p|1041p|1218x| 155x| | | | | | |17:33 | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |Z1 | | | | | | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 806a| 810a| 957a|1144a| 131p| 318p| 505p| 642p| 820p| 957p|1134p| 112x| 212x| 216x| | | | | 214 | UP | | 903a|1050a|1237p| 224p| 411p| 554p| 731p| 908p|1046p|1223x| 200x| | | | | | |18:10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | |Z2 | | | | | | | | | | | |GR |GY | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 811a| 814a|1001a|1149a| 136p| 323p| 510p| 647p| 824p|1002p|1139p| 116x| 217x| 220x| | | | | 215 | UP | | 908a|1055a|1242p| 229p| 416p| 558p| 736p| 913p|1050p|1228x| 205x| | | | | | |18:09 | | | | | | | | | | | | | * | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 819a|1006a|1153a| 140p| 328p| 515p| 652p| 829p|1007p|1144p| 121x| | | | | | 216 | UP | 800a| 803a| 913a|1100a|1247p| 234p| 421p| 603p| 741p| 918p|1055p|1233x| 207x| 213x| | | | |18:13 | |KL |KE | | | | | | | | | | | |K2 | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 824a|1011a|1158a| 145p| 332p| 519p| 657p| 834p|1011p|1149p| 126x| | | | | | 217 | UP | 805a| 808a| 918a|1105a|1252p| 239p| 426p| 608p| 745p| 923p|1100p|1237x| 211x| 217x| | | | |18:12 | |KL |KE | | | | | | | | | | | |K1 | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | E | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 829a|1016a|1203p| 150p| 337p| 524p| 702p| 839p|1016p|1154p| 131x| | | | | | 218 | UP | 810a| 812a| 923a|1110a|1257p| 244p| 431p| 613p| 750p| 928p|1105p|1242x| 216x| 222x| | | | |18:12 | |KL |KE | |
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Noise and Vibration Projects
    Frontop Engineering Limited 101 Amber Street, Unit 1, Markham Ontario, Canada, L3R 3B2 Telephone: (905) 947-0900; Fax: (905) 305-9370 Website: www.frontop.ca; Email: [email protected] List of Our Ongoing Noise and Vibration Monitoring Projects Project 1: Name of Project: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring Plan- Segment 1- Keelesdale Station Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: Metrolinx-Eglinton Crosstown Light Rapid Transit (ECLRT) Project Main project features: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring, Noise and Vibration Monitoring Activities performed: install and monitoring following instrument Prepared and installed six (6) real-time vibration stations and five (5) real-time noise monitoring station. And weekly attendant two (2) noise and two (2) vibration stations monitoring. Project 2: Name of Project: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring Plan- Segment 1- Mt Dennis Station Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: Metrolinx-Eglinton Crosstown Light Rapid Transit (ECLRT) Project Main project features: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring, Noise and Vibration Monitoring Activities performed: install and monitoring following instrument Prepared and installed four (4) real-time vibration stations and four (4) real-time noise monitoring station. And weekly attendant two (2) noise and two (2) vibration stations monitoring Project 3: Name of Project: TTC Wilson Yard Track and Structure Building Renovation (Contract AW1-3) Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: TTC Main project features: Track and Structure Building Renovation Activities performed: Prepared and installed the one (1) real-time noise monitoring station and one (1) real- time vibration monitoring station. Project 4: Name of Project: TTC Hillcrest Complex Surface Way Facility Replacement, and Harvey Shop Loading Deck (Contract M7-2 & M1-91) Client: TTC Main project features: Surface Way Facility Replacement Activities performed: Prepared and installed the two (2) real-time noise monitoring station and two (2) real- time vibration monitoring station.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C3. Public Engagement Record: December 2019
    Appendix C3 Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 • Website Screenshots Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 • Ask-A-Question Submissions Ask A Question – January 23 to September 16, 2020 Comment title Comment body Response Future Is the western terminus of the line to be built so that it would be able to be We are currently advancing plans for the line between Exhibition/Ontario expansion extended north west at a later date? Thank you Place and the Ontario Science Centre. However, these plans don’t preclude future expansions that may be presented to improve access and meet demand. Thorncliffe Park Where is the station in relation to Overlea Blvd Teams are analyzing the 15 stations identified in the Initial Business Case to Station determine whether or not they should be built, looking at factors like the potential number of users, ease of construction, and cost, to name a few. Findings will be presented in the Preliminary Design Business Case, which we are aiming to complete by summer 2020.By using the GO corridor and building bridges across the Don River instead of tunneling underneath it, a route that is approximately twice the length of the Relief Line South can be built at a similar cost. Also, using the GO corridor will allow people to more easily connect between GO and TTC services that will both be accessible by street level, saving time compared to connections that would lead people into deep underground stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto-Ontario Transit Update
    EX9.1 Attachment 3 STATUS OF PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS Background In April 2019, City Council considered a supplementary report from the City Manager on Toronto's Transit Expansion Program- Update and Next Steps (EX4.1d). This report included an attachment which contained a series of preliminary technical questions for the Province related to the four transit projects identified in the 2019 Ontario Budget, released in April. Throughout Q2 and Q3 2019, City and TTC staff have met with Provincial staff for the purposes of carrying out the technical assessment of the Province’s transit proposal as directed by Council. Through this process, City and TTC staff have received information and insight that informs the responses below, and is reflective of the various stages of design of the Province's priority projects. In some instances, further work and due diligence will be required as planning and design development progresses. Further information on the projects as well as more detailed technical information on the staff assessment can be found Attachment 4- Assessment of Ontario Line and Attachment 5- Assessment of Line 2 East Extension. # Question and Status of Current Answer Transit Planning and Design 1 At what stage in the project lifecycle is each project, relative to either the City/TTC project lifecycle map (in EX4.1) or the Metrolinx Benefits Management Framework? Based on the information provided by the Province through the Ontario-Toronto Transit Expansion Technical Working Group, the City and TTC have assessed that the projects
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Life Cycle Assessment to Analyze the Environmental Sustainability of Public Transit Modes for the City of Toronto
    Applying life cycle assessment to analyze the environmental sustainability of public transit modes for the City of Toronto by Ashton Ruby Taylor A thesis submitted to the Department of Geography & Planning in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September, 2016 Copyright © Ashton Ruby Taylor, 2016 Abstract One challenge related to transit planning is selecting the appropriate mode: bus, light rail transit (LRT), regional express rail (RER), or subway. This project uses data from life cycle assessment to develop a tool to measure energy requirements for different modes of transit, on a per passenger-kilometer basis. For each of the four transit modes listed, a range of energy requirements associated with different vehicle models and manufacturers was developed. The tool demonstrated that there are distinct ranges where specific transit modes are the best choice. Diesel buses are the clear best choice from 7-51 passengers, LRTs make the most sense from 201-427 passengers, and subways are the best choice above 918 passengers. There are a number of other passenger loading ranges where more than one transit mode makes sense; in particular, LRT and RER represent very energy-efficient options for ridership ranging from 200 to 900 passengers. The tool developed in the thesis was used to analyze the Bloor-Danforth subway line in Toronto using estimated ridership for weekday morning peak hours. It was found that ridership across the line is for the most part actually insufficient to justify subways over LRTs or RER. This suggests that extensions to the existing Bloor-Danforth line should consider LRT options, which could service the passenger loads at the ends of the line with far greater energy efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    transportation OPPORTUNITIES IN THE GREATER TORONTO AREA BUILDING ON TORONTO TRANSIT CITY AND MOVE ONTARIO 2020 The Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario (RCCAO) is an alliance composed of management and labour groups that represent all facets of the construction industry. Its stakeholders stem from residential and civil sectors of the construction industry, creating a unified voice. The RCCAO's goal is to work in cooperation with governments and related stakeholders to offer realistic solutions to a variety of challenges facing the construction industry. RCCAO members and contributors are: • Metro Toronto Apartment Builders Association • Toronto Residential Construction Labour Bureau • Heavy Construction Association of Toronto • Greater Toronto Sewer and Waterman Contractors Association • Residential Low-rise Forming Contractors Association of Metro Toronto & Vicinity • LIUNA Local 183 • Residential Carpentry Contractors Association • Carpenters' Union • Ontario Concrete & Drain Contractors Association • Toronto and Area Road Builders Association RCCAO is also a founding member of the Infrastructure Investment Coalition (IIC). For more information please visit: www.rccao.com www.infracoalition.ca BUILDING ON TORONTO TRANSIT CITY AND MOVEONTARIO 2020 AN INDEPENDENT STUDY FUNDED BY THE RESIDENTIAL AND CIVIL CONSTRUCTION ALLIANCE OF ONTARIO RICHARD M. SOBERMAN TRIMAP COMMUNICATIONS INC. JANUARY 2008 abstract 2007 was a banner year for transportation announcements including mobilization of a new regional transportation authority (Metrolinx), a federal/provincial agreement to fund a number of transit initiatives in Peel, York, Toronto, and Durham, seven new LRT routes as part of Toronto Transit City, and two thirds of the funding for 52 transit projects under MoveOntario 2020. With respect to Toronto Transit City, the study emphasizes that implementing true LRT service on existing streets requires a fundamental policy decision on the part of municipal officials to either reduce road capacity for automotive traffic and parking or to widen roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Executive Officer's Report
    STAFF REPORT Insert TTC logo here INFORMATION ONLY Chief Executive Officer’s Report – July 2015 Update Date: July 29, 2015 To: TTC Board From: Chief Executive Officer Summary The Chief Executive Officer’s Report is submitted each month to the TTC Board, for information. Copies of the report are also forwarded to each City of Toronto Councillor, the City Deputy Manager, and the City Chief Financial Officer, for information. The report is also available on the TTC’s website. Financial Impact There are no financial impacts associated with this report. Accessibility/Equity Matters There are no accessibility or equity issues associated with this report. Decision History The Chief Executive Officer’s Report was created in 2012 to better reflect the CEO’s goal to modernize the look and feel of the TTC in a transparent manner. The new report replaced the previous Chief General Manager’s Report, which did not provide a corporate-level focus on the organization’s key performance indicators (KPIs) and was not available on the TTC’s website in an easy-to-read format. Issue Background The Chief Executive Officer’s Report presents the organization’s KPIs in a performance “dashboard” format that enables the reader to view periodic performance in each area at-a­ glance. Targets for each KPI are provided although some are yet to be finalized. In addition, a “traffic light” indicates whether the organization is ahead of target (green), at risk (yellow) or below target (red) for the KPI in question and the trend arrows show whether performance is trending up or down.
    [Show full text]
  • Completed Monitoring Projects
    Frontop Engineering Limited 101 Amber Street, Units 1 & 2, Markham, Ontario, L3R 3B2, Canada Telephone: (905) 497-0900; Fax: (905) 305-9370 Website: www.frontop.ca; Email: [email protected] List of Our Completed Projects: Project 1: Name of Project: Government Canada - Injection Grouting of the Hasting Swing Bridge Replacement, Project Number R.055746.001, PWGSC Ontario. Location: Hasting Swing, Ontario, Canada Client: Public Works and Government Services Canada Main project features: Injection Grouting of the Hasting Swing Bridge Activities performed: install and monitoring following instrument Prepared the monitoring program for owner approve. Supply and installation ten (10) structures Monitoring Points and two (2) biaxial Tiltmeter and set up the automatic data collection and management system for monitoring during the injection grouting of the bridge. Project 2: Name of Project: TTC Lawrence West Station – Key Station Accessibility Project, Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: TTC Main project features: TTC Lawrence West Subway Station – Subway Station Renovation Work project. Activities performed: install and monitoring following instrument Prepared the geotechnical monitoring program for TTC approve. Prepared the noise and vibration monitoring program for TTC approve. Designed the monitoring instrumentation and installed two (2) inclinometers in soldier piles; Installed and monitored the one (1) real-time vibration stations and one (1) real-time noise control station; Precision survey and three dimensions monitoring data reporting for ten (10) surfaces monitoring for ground movement, subway slabs, buildings and shafts shoring system. Project 3: Name of Project: TTC – Wilson Yard Modifications - Site Services Stage 2, Phase 5 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: TTC Main project features: Wilson Yard Modifications Construction Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Lane Implementation Plan
    2045.5 For Action Bus Lane Implementation Plan Date: July 14, 2020 To: TTC Board From: Chief Strategy & Customer Officer Summary The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that the TTC is a vital service in Toronto providing transportation to essential destinations including employment, healthcare, groceries and pharmacies. Although TTC ridership may be down to 22% of pre-pandemic levels, the TTC continues to serve hundreds of thousands of customer-trips on a daily basis. We also have learned through this pandemic, that bus customers have relied on our services the most - 36% of the customers that used buses prior to COVID-19 are still using the system as compared to 19% of subway customers, as of the week ending June 26. As the city and GTHA re-opens and recovery begins, it is expected that people who have the resources and option to, will return to private vehicles, taxis or private transportation companies (PTCs) more quickly than to transit in order to maintain physical distance from others. The TTC’s surface transit network plays a critical role in moving people around Toronto and we must enhance its attractiveness to ensure it continues to provide a viable alternative to the automobile. A key initiative to achieve this is the implementation of bus transit lanes, which will provide customers with a safe, reliable and fast service. The TTC’s 5-Year Service Plan & 10-Year Outlook identified a 20-point action plan including Action 4.1 Explore Bus Transit Lanes. The TTC has worked with partner divisions at the City to develop the following prioritization and implementation plan for the five corridors identified in the Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarborough Subway Extension Preliminary Design Business Case February 2020
    Scarborough Subway Extension Preliminary Design Business Case February 2020 Scarborough Subway Extension Preliminary Design Business Case February 2020 Contents Executive Summary 7 Scope 7 Method of Analysis 7 Findings 8 Recommendation 9 1 Introduction 10 Preliminary Design Business Case Scope and Objectives 11 Background 11 Business Case Overview 13 2 Problem Statement 15 Introduction 16 Case for Change 16 Business as Usual 16 Strategic Value 18 Strategic Outcomes 19 Strong Connections: 19 Complete Travel Experiences: 19 Sustainable and Healthy Communities: 19 Strategic Objectives 19 3 Investment Options 21 Introduction 22 iv Options Development 22 Summary of Assumptions Used in this Business Case for Analysis and Travel Demand Modelling 25 4 Strategic Case 26 Introduction 27 BENEFIT 1: Bring rapid transit closer to Scarborough residents 28 BENEFIT 2: Increase access to existing economic opportunities and support the important employment centre at Scarborough Centre 29 BENEFIT 3: Support planned development in Scarborough 33 Outcome 2: COMPLETE TRAVEL EXPERIENCES 35 BENEFIT 4: Improve Travel Time and Reliability 36 BENEFIT 5: Build an Integrated Transportation Network 40 Outcome 3: SUSTAINABLE AND HEALTHY COMMUNITIES 43 BENEFIT 6: Move People with Less Energy and Pollution 44 BENEFIT 7: Improve Quality of Life and Public Health 45 Strategic Case Summary 46 5 Economic Case 48 Introduction and Assumptions 49 Costs 51 6 Financial Case 57 Introduction 58 Assumptions 58 Capital Costs 58 7 Deliverability and Operations Case 63 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Scarborough Rapid Transit Options
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Scarborough Rapid Transit Options: Reporting on Council Terms and Conditions Date: October 3, 2013 To: City Council From: City Manager Wards: All Reference Number: SUMMARY This report has been prepared in conjunction with the Chief Executive Officer of the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC). On July 16, 2013, City Council confirmed conditional support for the extension of the Bloor-Danforth subway north to Scarborough City Centre and Sheppard Avenue East, with an alignment along the McCowan road corridor ("McCowan Corridor Subway"). Council's support for the project is contingent on meeting specific terms and conditions, which include a $1.8 billion provincial contribution (in 2010 dollars, or $2.45 billion in inflated dollars), and a federal contribution (50% of the remaining net capital cost not covered by the Province), to augment City funding for the estimated $2.5 billion project (in 2010 dollars, or $3.56 billion in inflated dollars). Council committed to fund the City's share through potential development charges and a property tax increase. Council also requested the provincial and federal governments to commit funding by September 30, 2013. The purpose of this report is to inform Council that the terms and conditions for supporting the McCowan Corridor Subway have been met with the exception of the $1.8 billion ($2010) commitment from the Province. As a result, the City Manager does not have authority to amend the Master Agreement signed by the City, TTC and Metrolinx in November 2012. The Scarborough LRT remains an approved project under the Master Agreement. The Province has confirmed $1.48 billion (in $2010, or $1.99 billion in inflated dollars) is available for the replacement of the Scarborough RT.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Capital Projects
    APPENDIX 2 Major Capital Projects Re: BU22.2 ($000s) Life -to-Date Project name Comments/Issues 2015 Cash Flow Total Project Cost Status Explanation for Delay Start Date End Date On Budget On Time Approved YTD YE Approved LTD Planned Revised Spending Projected Budget Economic Development and Culture Fort York Visitor Centre Building open for public visitation; exhibits under 1,322 1,321 1,321 21,912 21,912 On Track Jun-15 Jun-16 Jun-16 Exhibits construction Ⓖ Ⓖ Casa Loma Phase 8 Project on schedule for completion in year 2016 5,442 4,190 4,190 6,115 4,863 On Track Jun-14 Apr-16 Apr-16 Ⓖ Ⓖ The Guild Revitalization Project originally delayed by third party 1,111 709 709 1,200 798 On Track Jun-14 Dec-15 Jun-16 redevelopment of Bickford hotel banquet facility. Recent progress with Dynamic Hospitality's Site Ⓨ Ⓨ plan application has re-focused the project. LTHCS Kipling Acres Site 2 On track 30,148 20,993 47,500 32,611 Constructio Kipling Acres' minor delay is due to updated Sep-14 Mar-16 Jul-16 (Phase 3) n is project completion schedule. The project is ongoing. expected to be completed by July 2016 on Ⓖ Ⓨ budget. Shelter Support & Housing Administration CAP REPAIRS/REPL- 1,500,606 760,438 760,438 1,575,000 834,832 On Track Jan-15 Dec-16 Dec-16 CITY OPERATED Ⓨ Ⓖ HOSTELS CAPITAL REP/REPL - 100,000 5,061 5,061 100,000 5,061 On Track Some of the larger project work at Jan-15 Dec-16 Dec-16 LEASED BLDG Landsdowne could not proceed until additional funding could be identified Ⓡ Ⓖ SHELTER 6,123,608 5,092,374 5,092,374 13,488,429 12,457,196 On Track Jan-15 Dec-16 Dec-16 DEV/REDEVELOPMENT Ⓖ Ⓖ KINGSTON ROAD 8,200,000 0 0 8,200,000 0 On Track The property was acquired in February 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Steps on the Scarborough Subway Extension
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Next Steps on the Scarborough Subway Extension Date: March 22, 2017 To: TTC Board From: Chief Executive Officer Summary The purpose of this report is to inform the TTC Board on City Executive Committee Report EX23.1: Next Steps on the Scarborough Subway Extension (Appendix A). EX23.1 outlines the recommended alignment and bus terminal for the Scarborough Subway Extension (SSE), and provides recommendations related to the SSE delivery strategy. EX23.1 was adopted, with amendments, by City Executive Committee on March 7, 2017 and will be considered by City Council at its meeting of March 28-29, 2017. This report also seeks Board approval for staff to proceed with the delivery strategy requirements relevant to the TTC and in support of Item EX23.1. Recommendations It is recommended that the TTC Board: 1. Receive the City report; 2. Further to City Recommendation 3a, authorize staff to negotiate with Infrastructure Ontario, along with the City staff, at a cost not to exceed $15 million; 3. Further to City Recommendation 3b, authorize staff to proceed with a Design- Bid-Build model, in the event an agreement with IO is not reached, per recommendation 2; 4. Further to City Recommendation 3a, authorize staff to enter into an agreement with IO and the City; Next Steps on the Scarborough Subway Extension 1 5. Further to City Recommendation 5, direct staff to report back to the TTC Board, at such time as the SSE Project has reached a Class 3 cost estimate, for authority to proceed with procurement of the SSE, which report shall include an updated project budget and; 6.
    [Show full text]