Spring Bird Communities of a High-Altitude Area of the Gloucester Tops, New South Wales

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spring Bird Communities of a High-Altitude Area of the Gloucester Tops, New South Wales Australian Field Ornithology 2018, 35, 21–29 http://dx.doi.org/10.20938/afo35021029 Spring bird communities of a high-altitude area of the Gloucester Tops, New South Wales Alan Stuart1 and Mike Newman2 181 Queens Road, New Lambton NSW 2305, Australia. Email: [email protected] 272 Axiom Way, Acton Park TAS 7021, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Annual spring surveys between 2010 and 2016 in a 5000-ha area in the Gloucester Tops in New South Wales recorded 71 bird species. All the study area was at altitudes >1100 m. The monitoring program was carried out with involvement of a team of volunteers, who regularly surveyed 21 1-km transects, for a total of 289 surveys. The study area was within the Barrington Tops and Gloucester Tops Key Biodiversity Area (KBA). The trigger species for the KBA listing was the Rufous Scrub-bird Atrichornis rufescens, which was found to have a widespread distribution in the study area, with an average Reporting Rate (RR) of 56.5%. Another species cited in the KBA nomination, the Flame Robin Petroica phoenicea, had an average RR of 12.6% but with considerable annual variation. Although the Flame Robin had a widespread distribution, one-third of all records came from just two of the 21 survey transects. Thirty-seven bird species had RRs >4% in the study area and were distributed across many transects. Of these, 20 species were relatively common, with RRs >20%, and they occurred in all or nearly all of the survey transects. Introduction shrubs such as Banksia species (Binns 1995). These two habitats occur as a mosaic throughout the study area, with A high-altitude part of the Gloucester Tops in New South some sections of Snow Gum E. pauciflora open woodland Wales (centred at 32°05′S, 151°36′E) was surveyed also present (Binns 1995). The Antarctic Beech rainforest annually in spring over the period 2010–2016. The is characterised by an open understorey of ferns and Gloucester Tops form the eastern part of the Barrington Bracken Pteridium esculentum, whereas the eucalypt Tops National Park. In 2009, they were included in a newly forests have a dense understorey of Lomandra species, designated Important Bird Area (IBA), the Barrington Tops Bracken, fallen timber and leaf-litter. Mostly, the vegetation and Gloucester Tops IBA, on the basis of the presence of within the study area is dense and impenetrable, but there seven species: Rufous Scrub-bird Atrichornis rufescens, are several roads and walking tracks, which collectively Green Catbird Ailuroedus crassirostris, Regent Bowerbird sample all the key aspects of the area (e.g. following water Sericulus chrysocephalus, Australian Logrunner Orthonyx courses, steep slopes and ridges). temminckii, Paradise Riflebird Lophorina paradiseus, Twenty-one 1-km transects were established along Flame Robin Petroica phoenicea, and Pale-yellow Robin existing roads and tracks in the survey area. Figures 1–2 Tregellasia capito (Dutson et al. 2009). More recently, IBAs show their general location; individual transects are listed have been redesignated as Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) in Table 1. The 1-km segments were measured either in order to extend the concept to non-avian threatened by odometer readings where car access was possible, species (BirdLife Australia 2017). The boundaries and or by measurement on Google maps (https://maps. general location of the Barrington Tops and Gloucester google.com.au/) to determine end-point map coordinates Tops KBA are presented in Figure 1, which also shows (see Newman et al. 2014 for additional detail). Twenty the area covered in the present study. All of the study transects were surveyed annually in 2010–2012, with area was at altitudes of >1100 m. It should be noted that one additional transect (GT3A) added in 2013, and then a considerable part of the KBA is at lower altitudes and, all received regular survey effort in 2013–2016. In 2015 based on pilot surveys conducted contemporaneously with and 2016, because of resource constraints, the monitoring this study, has different bird assemblages. program was reduced, to focus on 11 of the 21 transects The main focus was to locate Rufous Scrub-bird (the five Kerripit Road transects, the five Gloucester Tops territories, and the study area historically was known to Road transects and the first kilometre of the Careys Peak contain core habitat for this species (see detailed results transects). in Stuart & Newman 2018). However, all bird species Each surveyed 1-km transect was visited at least encountered during the surveys were recorded and are four times each spring, except for the second and third presented here. Analysis of results from the 2010–2016 kilometres of the Mount Nelson Track and the final transect survey has led to insights about the bird population of this of the Careys Peak Track, which were more difficult to high-altitude part of the Gloucester Tops. access and thus were visited only two–three times each year. All 21 transects contained the two main Gloucester Methods Tops habitat types, Antarctic Beech rainforest and eucalypt open forest, although the ratio of these varied. Transects Two main habitat types occur in the study area, CP2 and MN2 were predominantly Antarctic Beech characterised by their principal types of vegetation: rainforest with some pockets of eucalypt open forest. Antarctic Beech Lophozonia moorei rainforest, and open Transect CP3 had only some small pockets of rainforest. eucalypt forest comprising mainly Messmate Eucalyptus Surveys were carried out by volunteers between obliqua and Brown Barrel E. fastigata interspersed with September and November annually. The timing coincided 22 Australian Field Ornithology A. Stuart & M. Newman Figure 1. Barrington Tops and Gloucester Tops Key Biodiversity Area and the study area (shaded). with the breeding season for Rufous Scrub-birds, when calling males are most reliably detectable (Ferrier 1984). The 1-km transects were surveyed by one–three people (typically two people) with at least one person being experienced in the survey method. Surveys were done only when conditions were favourable (low–medium wind, zero–low rainfall). They commenced c. 0800 h and took 4–6 h to complete. Typically, c. 1 h was spent in each transect; the actual time varied, depending on whether any Scrub-birds were located (because the surveyors were collecting additional specific information in such cases). Transect CP1 received extra coverage because of some visits to train new volunteers in Scrub-bird call recognition and to place and retrieve a Song Meter (Stuart et al. 2012). Surveyors recorded the presence of all bird species seen or heard along each 1-km transect, including any birds flying over (although extensive canopy cover limited the opportunities for the latter). No limit was set for the maximum distance from the track for records; under favourable conditions, a calling Rufous Scrub-bird can be heard 150 m away (Ferrier 1984) but for many other species the transect’s sampling width would have been less than that. For three sets of transects (Careys Peak, Glowang, Mount Nelson) the surveys involved two passes through each 1-km transect, i.e. outbound and then inbound a few hours later. Less time was devoted to surveying during the inbound passage and the total time spent in the transect remained c. 1 h. When surveyors had to return through a transect, they were asked to combine the records for both Figure 2. Locations for the transects in the Gloucester the outbound and inbound passages. The resulting data Tops study area (from Newman et al. 2014). Bird communities in spring, Gloucester Tops, New South Wales 23 were submitted to the BirdLife Australia Atlas (Birdata) as CP5, but this transect included all the species with overall 500-m-radius area surveys. Reporting Rates (RRs) for each RR >20%. This transect was surveyed only nine times. species for each year from 2010 to 2014 inclusive were Annual changes to the RR of regularly occurring species then calculated, and also for the 5-year period 2010–2014 (RR >4%) were analysed using only the first 5 years of and the 7-year period 2010–2016. The RR is the number data (2010–2014); because the survey effort was scaled of times the species was recorded divided by the number down in 2015 and 2016, data from the 2015–2016 surveys of surveys conducted (expressed as a percentage). were not used. Table 4 shows the RR in each year for 2010–2014 for these 37 species and the Coefficient of Results Variation (CV; often termed the relative standard deviation). From 2010 to 2016, a total of 289 surveys was carried out in the 21 1-km transects, recording 71 bird species. Discussion The cumulative number of species seen over the 7-year period is presented in Figure 3, and Figure 4 shows the The overall RRs of individual species (Table 3) indicate cumulative number of species in relation to survey effort, how often a species was recorded during the surveys. For which varied from year to year as already discussed. each species, the magnitude of the overall RR reflects a Table 1 summarises the results for each of the 21 transects, combination of its abundance, how widely it is distributed and Table 2 summarises the annual and overall results. (as indicated by the percentage of transects reported in Table 3), its ease of detection (i.e. large or vocal versus Seventy-one species were recorded in the spring surveys; small or cryptic) and variations in its annual occurrence the complete list of species is provided in Appendix 1. (Table 4). Thirty-four species had fewer than five records each and, in most of those cases, there were only one–three records. The cumulative number of species recorded increased With some exceptions, which will be addressed in relevant rapidly to 52 during the first 2 years of the study sections below, those species can be considered vagrant (Figure 3).
Recommended publications
  • Whistler3 Frontcover
    The Whistler is the occasionally issued journal of the Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc. ISSN 1835-7385 The aims of the Hunter Bird Observers Club (HBOC), which is affiliated with Bird Observation and Conservation Australia, are: To encourage and further the study and conservation of Australian birds and their habitat To encourage bird observing as a leisure-time activity HBOC is administered by a Committee: Executive: Committee Members: President: Paul Baird Craig Anderson Vice-President: Grant Brosie Liz Crawford Secretary: Tom Clarke Ann Lindsey Treasurer: Rowley Smith Robert McDonald Ian Martin Mick Roderick Publication of The Whistler is supported by a Sub-committee: Mike Newman (Joint Editor) Harold Tarrant (Joint Editor) Liz Crawford (Production Manager) Chris Herbert (Cover design) Liz Huxtable Ann Lindsey Jenny Powers Mick Roderick Alan Stuart Authors wishing to submit manuscripts for consideration for publication should consult Instructions for Authors on page 61 and submit to the Editors: Mike Newman [email protected] and/or Harold Tarrant [email protected] Authors wishing to contribute articles of general bird and birdwatching news to the club newsletter, which has 6 issues per year, should submit to the Newsletter Editor: Liz Crawford [email protected] © Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc. PO Box 24 New Lambton NSW 2305 Website: www.hboc.org.au Front cover: Australian Painted Snipe Rostratula australis – Photo: Ann Lindsey Back cover: Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva - Photo: Chris Herbert The Whistler is proudly supported by the Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority Editorial The Whistler 3 (2009): i-ii The Whistler – Editorial The Editors are pleased to provide our members hopefully make good reading now, but will and other ornithological enthusiasts with the third certainly provide a useful point of reference for issue of the club’s emerging journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat
    Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Dedicated bird enthusiasts have kindly contributed to this sequence of 106 bird species spotted in the habitat over the last few years Kookaburra Red-browed Finch Black-faced Cuckoo- shrike Magpie-lark Tawny Frogmouth Noisy Miner Spotted Dove [1] Crested Pigeon Australian Raven Olive-backed Oriole Whistling Kite Grey Butcherbird Pied Butcherbird Australian Magpie Noisy Friarbird Galah Long-billed Corella Eastern Rosella Yellow-tailed black Rainbow Lorikeet Scaly-breasted Lorikeet Cockatoo Tawny Frogmouth c Noeline Karlson [1] ( ) Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Variegated Fairy- Yellow Faced Superb Fairy-wren White Cheeked Scarlet Honeyeater Blue-faced Honeyeater wren Honeyeater Honeyeater White-throated Brown Gerygone Brown Thornbill Yellow Thornbill Eastern Yellow Robin Silvereye Gerygone White-browed Eastern Spinebill [2] Spotted Pardalote Grey Fantail Little Wattlebird Red Wattlebird Scrubwren Willie Wagtail Eastern Whipbird Welcome Swallow Leaden Flycatcher Golden Whistler Rufous Whistler Eastern Spinebill c Noeline Karlson [2] ( ) Common Sea and shore birds Silver Gull White-necked Heron Little Black Australian White Ibis Masked Lapwing Crested Tern Cormorant Little Pied Cormorant White-bellied Sea-Eagle [3] Pelican White-faced Heron Uncommon Sea and shore birds Caspian Tern Pied Cormorant White-necked Heron Great Egret Little Egret Great Cormorant Striated Heron Intermediate Egret [3] White-bellied Sea-Eagle (c) Noeline Karlson Uncommon Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Grey Goshawk Australian Hobby
    [Show full text]
  • Beak and Feather Disease Viru
    Fact sheet Beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) is the causative agent of psittacine beak and feather disease (PBFD), an endemic disease in Australia’s wild parrot populations. Descriptions of parrots with feather loss consistent with the disease date back to the late 1800s (Ashby 1907). The virus is believed to have originated in Australia sometime following the separation of the continent from Gondwanaland, with spread to other parts of the world with modern movement of parrots as pet and aviary species . It has the potential to impact on several endangered Australian and non-Australian parrot populations and is listed as a key threatening process by the Australian government. Of late, the virus also has been identified in various non-psittacine species . Beak and feather disease virus is a 14 to 16 nm non-enveloped icosahedral DNA virus belonging to the family Circoviridae. Formerly, it was believed that the circoviruses recovered from a diverse range of psittacines were all antigenically similar. Doubt was cast on this theory when a virus that appeared to be serologically and genetically different was isolated from cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) (Shearer et al. 2008). More recent research appears to indicate that psittacine circoviruses can be divided into two species and multiple viral strains. Based on work by Varsani et al. (2011), BFDV contains 14 strains, while budgerigar circovirus (BCV), a newly defined species to date only found in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates), contains three strains. However, it is likely that this number will continue to increase as shown by the discovery of two new distinct BFDV lineages in orange-bellied parrots (Neophema chrysogaster) (Peters et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential Role of the Forest Product Commission's Midwest
    The Potential Role of the Forest Product Commission’s Midwest Pine Plantations as a Food Resource for Carnaby’s Cockatoo: A Concept Study using GPS and Satellite Tag Data A report for the Forest Products Commission – Western Australia Jill M. Shephard and Kristin S. Warren 2018 School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University Suggested Citation: Shephard, J.M. and Warren, K.S. 2018. The Potential Role of the Forest Product Commission’s Midwest Pine Plantations as a Food Resource for Carnaby’s Cockatoo: A Concept Study using GPS and Satellite Tag Data. Report for The Forest Products Commission, Western Australia. Ethics and Permit Statement: All tracking took place with approval of the Western Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions under permit number: SF010448; and with Murdoch University Animal Ethics permit RW2768/15 and Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme (ABBBS) Banding Authority Number 1862. Acknowledgements: We gratefully acknowledge the financial support and in-kind assistance provided by Newmont Boddington Gold, South 32, PTI Architecture, The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions WA, Perth Zoo and Kaarakin Black Cockatoo Conservation Centre in supporting the GPS and Satellite tracking work used in this report. Thank you to Willem Bouten for oversight of the UvA-BiTS tracking system, and to Karen Riley for endless hours in the field downloading data and completing flock follows. December 2018 Cover photograph by Georgia Kerr Midwest pine as a resource for Carnaby’s Cockatoo
    [Show full text]
  • Everyone Welcome Grey Butcherbird Robin Hide
    Gang-gang JUNE 2020 Newsletter of the Canberra Ornithologists Group Inc. JUNE MEETING Summary/analysis of the past month and what to watch Wednesday 10 June 2020 out for this month virtual meeting After the very busy previous month, the very cold change that swept through There will be virtual meeting on 10 June. at the end of April/early May seemed to very much quieten bird activity in Arrangements for this are still being the COG area of Interest (AoI) for the 4 week period from 29 April covered by organised and COG members will be this column. This is despite the weather then warming up to around average separately advised of the details, temperatures with limited rain falling. For example, on the afternoon of 17 including how to participate. May, Mark Clayton and his wife took advantage of the glorious weather and decided to go for a drive just to see what birds were about. They left home The single speaker for this virtual meeting in Kaleen at about 1 pm and travelled via Uriarra Crossing all the way to will be Alice McGlashan on “Hollow using Angle Crossing Road, but could hardly find a bird. species and nest box designs for the Canberra region”. Andrea and I have been doing regular walks in the local area and have been also been remarking on the lack of birds. That same morning we walked Many of our local native birds and mammals use tree hollows for nesting or Continued Page 2 sleeping. Much of the native habitat in and around Canberra has a deficit of old hollow bearing trees, from land clearing and selective removal of large trees for timber and firewood.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management Newsletter: Eucalyptus: a Complex Challenge
    Golden Gate National Recreation Area National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Point Reyes National Seashore EucalyptusEucalyptus A Complex Challenge AUSTRALIA FIRE MANAGEMENT, RESOURCE PROTECTION, AND THE LEGACY OF TASMANIAN BLUE GUM DURING THE AGE OF EXPLORATION, CURIOUS SPECIES dead, dry, oily leaves and debris—that is especially flammable. from around the world captured the imagination, desire and Carried by long swaying branches, fire spreads quickly in enterprising spirit of many different people. With fragrant oil and eucalyptus groves. When there is sufficient dead material in the massive grandeur, eucalyptus trees were imported in great canopy, fire moves easily through the tree tops. numbers from Australia to the Americas, and California became home to many of them. Adaptations to fire include heat-resistant seed capsules which protect the seed for a critical short period when fire reaches the CALIFORNIA Eucalyptus globulus, or Tasmanian blue gum, was first introduced crowns. One study showed that seeds were protected from lethal to the San Francisco Bay Area in 1853 as an ornamental tree. heat penetration for about 4 minutes when capsules were Soon after, it was widely planted for timber production when exposed to 826o F. Following all types of fire, an accelerated seed domestic lumber sources were being depleted. Eucalyptus shed occurs, even when the crowns are only subjected to intense offered hope to the “Hardwood Famine”, which the Bay Area heat without igniting. By reseeding when the litter is burned off, was keenly aware of, after rebuilding from the 1906 earthquake. blue gum eucalyptus like many other species takes advantage of the freshly uncovered soil that is available after a fire.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HONEYEATERS of KANGAROO ISLAND HUGH FOB,D Accepted August
    134 SOUTH AUsTRALIAN ORNITHOLOGIST, 21 THE HONEYEATERS OF KANGAROO ISLAND HUGH FOB,D Accepted August. 1976 Kangaroo Island is the third largest of Aus­ In the present paper I discuss morphological tralia's islands (4,500 sq. km) and has been and ecological differences between populations separated from the neighbouring Fleurieu of several species of honeyeaters from Kangaroo Peninsula for 10,000 years (Abbott 1973). A Island and the Fleurieu Peninsula respectively, mere 14 km separates island from mainland; and speculate on how these differences origin­ but the island has a distinct avifauna and lacks ated. many of the mainland species. This paucity of DIFFERENCES IN PLUMAGE species has been attributed to extinction after The Kangaroo Island population of Purple­ isolation and failure to recolonise (Abbott gaped Honeyeater was described as larger and 1974, 1976), and to lack of suitable habitat brighter than the mainland population by (Ford and Paton 1975). Mathews (1923-4). Brightness of plumage is a Nine species of honeyeaters are resident on very subjective characteristic, and in my opinion Kangaroo Island. The Purple-gaped Honey­ Purple-gaped Honeyeaters on Kangaroo Island eater Lichenostomus cratitius (formerly Meli­ are, if anything, duller than mainland ones. phaga cratitia) was described as a distinct sub­ Condon (1951) says that the gape of this species by Mathews (1923-24); and Keast species is invariably yellow on Kangaroo Island (1961) mentions that six other species differ in instead of lilac, although he later comments a minor way from mainland populations and that lilac-gaped individuals do occur on the may merit subspecific status.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology and Behaviour of the Scarlet
    Corella, 2006, 30(3/4):5945 BREEDINGBIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUROF THE SCARLETROBIN Petroicamulticolor AND EASTERNYELLOW ROBIN Eopsaltriaaustralis IN REMNANTWOODLAND NEAR ARMIDALE, NEW SOUTH WALES S.J. S.DEBUS Division of Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351 E-mail: [email protected] Received:I3 January 2006 The breeding biology and behaviour of the Scarlet Robin Petroica multicolor and Eastern Yellow Robin Eopsaltria australis were studied at lmbota Nature Reserve, on the New England Tableland of New South Wales,in 200G-2002by colour-bandingand nest-monitoring.Yellow Robins nested low in shelteredpositions, in plants with small stem diameters(mostly saplings,live trees and shrubs),whereas Scarlet Robins nested high in exposed positions, in plants with large stem diameters (mostly live trees, dead branches or dead trees).Yellow Robin clutch size was two or three eggs (mean 2.2; n = 19). Incubationand nestling periods were 15-17 days and 11-12 days respectively(n = 6) for the Yellow Robin, and 16-18 days (n = 3) and 16 days (n = 1) respectivelyfor the ScarletRobin. Both specieswere multi-brooded,although only YellowRobins successfully raised a second brood. The post-fledging dependence period lasted eight weeks for Yellow Robins, and six weeks for Scarlet Robins. The two robins appear to differ in their susceptibilityto nest predation, with corresponding differences in anti-predator strategies. INTRODUCTION provides empirical data on aspects that may vary geographicallywith seasonalconditions, or with habitator The
    [Show full text]
  • Casanova Borrow Pit
    Native Vegetation Clearance Proposal – Casanova Borrow Pit Data Report Clearance under the Native Vegetation Regulations 2017 January 2021 Prepared by Matt Launer from BlackOak Environmental Pty Ltd Page 1 of 45 Table of contents 1. Application information 2. Purpose of clearance 2.1 Description 2.2 Background 2.3 General location map 2.4 Details of the proposal 2.5 Approvals required or obtained 2.6 Native Vegetation Regulation 2.7 Development Application information (if applicable) 3. Method 3.1 Flora assessment 3.2 Fauna assessment 4. Assessment outcomes 4.1 Vegetation assessment 4.2 Threatened Species assessment 4.3 Cumulative impacts 4.4 Addressing the Mitigation hierarchy 4.5 Principles of clearance 4.6 Risk Assessment 4.7 NVC Guidelines 5. Clearance summary 6. Significant environmental benefit 7. Appendices 7.1 Fauna Survey (where applicable) 7.2 Bushland, Rangeland or Scattered Tree Vegetation Assessment Scoresheets (to be submitted in Excel format). 7.3 Flora Species List 7.4 SEB Management Plan (where applicable) Page 2 of 45 1. Application information Application Details Applicant: District Council of Lower Eyre Peninsula Key contact: Marc Kilmartin M: 0438 910 777 E: [email protected] Landowner: John Casanova Site Address: Approximately 550 m east of Fishery Bay Road Local Government District Council of Lower Eyre Hundred: Sleaford Area: Peninsula Title ID: CT/6040/530 Parcel ID D79767 A63 Summary of proposed clearance Purpose of clearance To develop a Borrow Pit. A Borrow Pit is a deposit of natural gravel, loam or earth that is excavated for use as a road making material.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Economic Zone
    Issue No. 3/14 June 2014 The Club aims to: • encourage and further the study and conservation of Australian birds and their habitat • encourage bird observing as a leisure-time activity A Black-necked Stork pair at Hexham Swamp performing a spectacular “Up-down” display before chasing away the interloper - in this case a young female - Rod Warnock CONTENTS President’s Column 2 Conservation Issues New Members 2 Hunter Economic Zone 9 Club Activity Reports Macquarie Island now pest-free 10 Glenrock and Redhead 2 Powling Street Wetlands, Port Fairy 11 Borah TSR near Barraba 3 Bird Articles Tocal Field Days 4 Plankton makes scents for seabirds 12 Tocal Agricultural College 4 Superb Fairy-wrens sing to their chicks Rufous Scrub-bird Monitoring 5 before birth 13 Future Activity - BirdLife Seminar 5 BirdLife Australia News 13 Birding Features Birding Feature Hunter Striated Pardalote Subspecies ID 6 Trans-Tasman Birding Links since 2000 14 Trials of Photography - Oystercatchers 7 Club Night & Hunterbirding Observations 15 Featured Birdwatching Site - Allyn River 8 Club Activities June to August 18 Please send Newsletter articles direct to the Editor, HBOC postal address: Liz Crawford at: [email protected] PO Box 24 New Lambton NSW 2305 Deadline for the next edition - 31 July 2014 Website: www.hboc.org.au President’s Column I’ve just been on the phone to a lady that lives in Sydney was here for a few days visiting the area, talking to club and is part of a birdwatching group of friends that are members and attending our May club meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Breeding Behaviour of the Red-Capped Robin Petroica Goodenovii
    VOL. 12 (7) SEPTEMBER 1988 209 AUSTRALIAN BIRD WATCHER 1988, 12, 209-216 Notes on the Breeding Behaviour of the Red-capped Robin Petroica goodenovii by PETER COVENTRY, 12 Baroona Avenue, Cooma North, N.S.W. 2630 Summary Three pairs of Red-capped Robins Petroica goodenovii were studied on the Southern Tablelands of' New South Wales during a temporary invasion in 1981-1983, at the end of a drought. The birds arrived in spring, the males ahead of the females, and defended territories against Scarlet Robins P. TTUilticolor. One male Red-capped Robin uttered the Scarlet Robin's song during territory advertisement. After raising one or two broods the birds dispersed for the winter, the adults either at the same time as or after the departure of juveniles. After breeding the adults moulted, the females starting before the males. Nests were built, by females only, at a height of 2-6m (mean 3.6 m), and took 5-9 days (mean 8 days) to complete. Eggs were laid between mid October and late December. Mean clutch size was 1.9 eggs (1-2, mode 2), and mean brood size at fledging was 1.4 (1-2, mode I). Incubation lasted 14 days (three clutches), the nestling period was 11-16 days (mean 12.5 days) and the post fledging dependence period lasted at least two weeks. The breeding success rate was 54% (7 fledglings from 13 eggs), and the nest success rate was 63% (5 nests successful out of 8 for which the outcome was known). Nest-building, courtship, parental behaviour and vocalisations are described.
    [Show full text]