DOCSLIB.ORG

Perennial Grass Community Response to Severe Drought, Topo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perennial Grass Community Response to Severe Drought, Topo PERENNIAL GRASS COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO SEVERE DROUGHT, TOPO- EDAPHIC VARIATION, AND LONG-TERM HERBIVORY ON THE EDWARDS PLATEAU OF TEXAS A Thesis by COLIN SCOTT SHACKELFORD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2004 Major Subject: Rangeland Ecology and Management PERENNIAL GRASS COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO SEVERE DROUGHT, TOPO- EDAPHIC VARIATION, AND LONG-TERM HERBIVORY ON THE EDWARDS PLATEAU OF TEXAS A Thesis by COLIN SCOTT SHACKELFORD Submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved as to style and content by: ________________________ ________________________ Fred Smeins Raghavan Srinivasan (Chair of Committee) (Member) ________________________ ________________________ Charles Taylor Larry White (Member) (Member) ________________________ Steve Whisenant (Head of Department) August 2004 Major Subject: Rangeland Ecology and Management iii ABSTRACT Perennial Grass Community Response to Severe Drought, Topo-Edaphic Variation, and Long Term Herbivory on the Edwards Plateau of Texas. (August 2004) Colin Scott Shackelford, B.A., Austin College Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Fred Smeins Perennial grass vegetation dynamics of heavy grazing, moderate grazing and ungrazed treatments were analyzed during two extreme drought events: the drought of 1951 to 1956 and the drought events centered on the year 2000. Analysis of each drought event from weather records and Palmer Drought Severity Index values showed that the intensity, duration and pattern of each drought event were structurally unique. Grazing intensity was the primary driver of perennial grass species composition and community structure both during and between each drought event. Total basal area for each drought event was driven primarily by variation in precipitation pattern. Basal area per plant dynamics were significantly influenced by grazing intensity while plant density was driven by both precipitation and grazing intensity. Topo-edaphic variation significantly influenced the persistence and distribution of perennial grass species during an extreme drought event centered on the year 2000. The presence of large or abundant surface rock features facilitated the survival of perennial grasses during this drought event by creating a positive soil microenvironment. Sites with large surface rock features acted as drought refugia for perennial grass populations. Sites with abundant surface rock features had 10 times greater perennial grass basal area and 5 times greater plant density than sites with few surface rock features. Grazing intensity was the primary driver of species composition and community structure within both refugia and non-refugia sites. Grazing intensity had no effect on perennial grass basal area. However, grazed treatments had two times greater perennial grass density than non-grazed treatments. Species response to grazing intensity and surface rock cover was individualistic. Grazing response groups (intolerant, intermediate, and tolerant) separated along a gradient of surface rock cover iv and grazing intensity. Abundant surface rock features act as refugia for perennial grasses by facilitating their persistence during extreme drought events on the Edwards Plateau. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the invaluable input, time, energy, effort, small kindnesses and support from many people. I would like to first thank my parents for their support throughout this endeavor. Their patience and friendship endured through many dinner conversations where I waxed academic about things they didn’t understand or necessarily want to understand and yet in the end they still served me pie. Sincere thanks goes to my committee chair, Dr. Fred Smeins, for his insight, guidance and friendship over the last three years. His curiosity, good nature, and passion for ecology have been an inspiration. I am grateful to the other members of my committee, Dr. Charles “Butch” Taylor, Dr. Larry White, and Dr. Raghavan Srinivasan for their guidance, input and support throughout this project. Special thanks go to my friends, John and Jeanne Anne, whose home acted as my own private B&B and respite during the stressful moments of my graduate career. Extra thanks goes to Jeanne Anne for coming out to Sonora, braving the summer heat and acting as my GPS wrangler, gate monkey and goat herder. You truly are a dangerous woman and no, you’re wrong, the shade index is a 2 and not a 3, so quit arguing. Thanks to Isaac, Adam, Peter, Eric and Katie as well. Support from my Houston cohort has been invaluable and the friendship and generosity from each of you knows no end. I am grateful for the friendships with the faculty and my fellow graduate students in the Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management. These friendships contributed significantly to my professional education, broadened my understanding of ecology, and enriched my life while here at Texas A&M. Thanks to all who made my graduate career at Texas A&M the important and worthwhile learning experience it has been. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................... viii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 1 Justification .......................................................................................... 1 Hypothesis and Objectives................................................................... 2 Literature Review................................................................................. 3 Semi-Arid Environments................................................................ 3 Herbivory, Climate Variation and Vegetation Response ............... 4 Patch Specific Response to Herbivory and Drought...................... 5 Grazing and Drought Refugia........................................................ 6 II STUDY AREA........................................................................................... 9 III LONG TERM WEATHER AND VEGETATION DYNAMICS: PERENNIAL GRASS COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO TWO DROUGHT EVENTS................................................................................ 13 Introduction .......................................................................................... 13 Methods................................................................................................ 13 Analysis of Drought Pattern and Intensity ..................................... 13 Vegetation Sampling ...................................................................... 17 Vegetation Data Analysis............................................................... 18 Results .................................................................................................. 19 vii CHAPTER Page Drought Pattern and Intensity........................................................ 19 Grazing Influence and Species Composition Between Drought Events................................................................ 24 Perennial Grass Community Structure Between Drought Events................................................................ 33 Discussion ............................................................................................ 40 IV PATCH SPECIFIC RESPONSE TO DROUGHT AND HERBIVORY ON THE EDWARDS PLATEAU: TOPO-EDAPHIC VARIATION AND PERENNIAL GRASS SURVIVAL.................................................................................. 48 Introduction .......................................................................................... 48 Methods................................................................................................ 48 Vegetation and Plot Sampling........................................................ 48 Data Analysis................................................................................. 52 Perennial Grass Community Structure..................................... 52 Driving Parameters................................................................... 53 Species Relationships............................................................... 54 Results .................................................................................................. 56 Perennial Grass Community Structure........................................... 56 Driving Variables........................................................................... 64 Species Relationships..................................................................... 70 Discussion ............................................................................................ 81 Perennial Grass Population Structure............................................. 81 Species Relationships..................................................................... 82 Driving Variables........................................................................... 83 V CONCLUSION .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Phylogeny of the Hubbardochloinae Including Tetrachaete (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae)
    Peterson, P.M., K. Romaschenko, and Y. Herrera Arrieta. 2020. A phylogeny of the Hubbardochloinae including Tetrachaete (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae). Phytoneuron 2020-81: 1–13. Published 18 November 2020. ISSN 2153 733 A PHYLOGENY OF THE HUBBARDOCHLOINAE INCLUDING TETRACHAETE (CYNODONTEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: POACEAE) PAUL M. PETERSON AND KONSTANTIN ROMASCHENKO Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected]; [email protected] YOLANDA HERRERA ARRIETA Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA Durango, C.P. 34220, México [email protected] ABSTRACT The phylogeny of subtribe Hubbardochloinae is revisited, here with the inclusion of the monotypic genus Tetrachaete, based on a molecular DNA analysis using ndhA intron, rpl32-trnL, rps16 intron, rps16- trnK, and ITS markers. Tetrachaete elionuroides is aligned within the Hubbardochloinae and is sister to Dignathia. The biogeography of the Hubbardochloinae is discussed, its origin likely in Africa or temperate Asia. In a previous molecular DNA phylogeny (Peterson et al. 2016), the subtribe Hubbardochloinae Auquier [Bewsia Gooss., Dignathia Stapf, Gymnopogon P. Beauv., Hubbardochloa Auquier, Leptocarydion Hochst. ex Stapf, Leptothrium Kunth, and Lophacme Stapf] was found in a clade with moderate support (BS = 75, PP = 1.00) sister to the Farragininae P.M. Peterson et al. In the present study, Tetrachaete elionuroides Chiov. is included in a phylogenetic analysis (using ndhA intron, rpl32- trnL, rps16 intron, rps16-trnK, and ITS DNA markers) in order to test its relationships within the Cynodonteae with heavy sampling of species in the supersubtribe Gouiniodinae P.M. Peterson & Romasch. Chiovenda (1903) described Tetrachaete Chiov. with a with single species, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Habitat Mitigation Standards and Implementation Guidelines
    Town of Sahuarita Riparian Habitat Mitigation Standards and Implementation Guidelines A supplement to Title 18, STC 18.65 of the Town of Sahuarita Zoning Code titled “Riparian Habitat Protection and Mitigation Requirements” Section One: The Ordinance 2 Overview of the Riparian Habitat Protection Ordinance Options for Treatment of Regulated Habitat In Lieu Fee Option 8 Modified Development Standards 10 Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan Approval Section Two: Riparian Classifications, Descriptions, 12 Mitigation & Monitoring Requirements Characteristic of Habitat Onsite Mitigation Requirements Mitigation Requirements 15 Hydroriparian, Mesoriparian & Xeroriparian Mitigation Standards 17 Section Three: Components of a Mitigation Plan Submittal 20 Mitigation Plan Components Mitigation Planting Plan 23 Elements of a Monitoring Report 25 Section Four: Frequently Asked Questions 27 Appendix A: Mitigation Plan Submittal Checklists 29 Appendix B: Approved Plant List 42 Appendix C: Installation & Maintenance Requirements 56 Appendix D: Water Harvesting Guidelines 64 Appendix E: List of Noxious & Invasive Plant Species 66 & Best Management Practices Appendix F: Field Mapping & Onsite Vegetation Survey 73 Appendix G: Glossary of Terms 75 Appendix H: Standard Operating Procedure (RECON) 78 This document was prepared with permission from Pima County Regional Flood Control District and Novak Environmental, Inc. It contains reformatting and minor rewording of a document prepared by McGann and Associates, Inc. under contract to Pima County Flood Control District in July, 1994. The format is copyrighted by Novak Environmental, Inc. 2001 1 September 24, 2012 Section One: The Ordinance What is the history of this Ordinance? On April 24, 2006, the Town of Sahuarita Town Council adopted the Town of Sahuarita Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument
    Schmidt, Drost, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2006-1163 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2006-1163 November 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument By Cecilia A. Schmidt, Charles A. Drost, and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2006-1163 November, 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 Note: This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use in the U.S. Geological Survey. This information is NOT intended for use in open literature prior to publication by the investigators named unless permission is obtained in writing from the investigators named and from the Station Leader. Suggested Citation Schmidt, C. A., C. A. Drost, and W. L. Halvorson 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument. USGS Open-File Report 2006-1163.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Rita Experimental Range: 100 Years (1903 to 2003) of Accomplishments and Contributions; Conference Proceedings; 2003 October 30–November 1; Tucson, AZ
    Michael A. Crimmins Theresa M. Mau-Crimmins Climate Variability and Plant Response at the Santa Rita Experimental Range, Arizona Abstract: Climatic variability is reflected in differential establishment, persistence, and spread of plant species. Although studies have investigated these relationships for some species and functional groups, few have attempted to characterize the specific sequences of climatic conditions at various temporal scales (subseasonal, seasonal, and interannual) associated with proliferation of particular species. Research has primarily focused on the climate conditions concurrent with or occurring just prior to a vegetation response. However, the cumulative effect of antecedent conditions taking place for several consecutive seasons may have a greater influence on plant growth. In this study, we tested whether the changes in overall cover of plant species can be explained by antecedent climate conditions. Temperature, precipitation, and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) values at various lags were correlated with cover. PDSI had the strongest correlations for several drought-intolerant species at lags up to six seasons prior to the sampling date. Precipita- tion, surprisingly, did not correlate with species cover as strongly as PDSI. This is attributed to PDSI capturing soil moisture conditions, which are important to plant growth, better than raw precipi- tation measurements. Temperature correlations were weak and possessed little explanatory power as predictors of species cover. Acknowledgments: Data sets were provided by the Santa Rita Experimental Range Digital Database. Funding for the digitization of these data was provided by the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station and the University of Arizona. Introduction ______________________________________________________ Climatic variability is reflected in differential establishment, persistence, and spread of plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Bundleflower (Desmanthus Illinoensis) Story by Alan Shadow, Manager USDA-NRCS East Texas Plant Materials Center Nacogdoches, Texas
    Helping People Help The Land September/October 2011 Issue No. 11 The Reverchon Naturalist Recognizing the work of French botanist Julien Reverchon, who began collecting throughout the North Central Texas area in 1876, and all the botanists/naturalists who have followed ... Drought, Heat and Native Trees ranging from simple things like more extensive root systems, to more drastic measures like pre- Story by Bruce Kreitler mature defoliation, what they actually have little Abilene, Texas defense against is a very prolonged period of no appreciable water supply. nybody that has traveled in Texas this year A will have noticed that not only most of the By the way, even though they are usually the land browned out, but also if you look at the trees same species, there is a difference in landscape in the fields and beside the roads, they aren't trees and native trees, which are untended plants looking so good either. It doesn't take a rocket that have to fend for themselves. While they are scientist to realize that extreme high temperatures indeed the same basic trees, the differences be- combined with, and partially caused by, drought tween the environments that they live in are huge are hard on trees. and thus overall general environmental factors such as drought, temperature, and insect infesta- Since I'm pretty sure that most of the people read- tions act on them differently. For the purposes of ing this article understand very well that drought this article, I'm referring to trees that are on their is a problem for trees, the question isn't is the pre- own, untended for their entire lives in fields, pas- sent drought going to have an effect on trees, but tures, forests, or just wherever nature has placed rather, what are the present effects of the drought them and refer to them as native trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaping with Native Grasses
    Landscaping with native Grasses Keith Pawelek Assistant Director of South Texas Natives • STN formalized in 2001 by founding grant from the Robert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation • 2001: commercial seeds of native plants for south Texas were not available-the looming IH-69 corridor brought persistent concerns about a lack of native seed to the forefront • Pasture, rangeland, restoration, and reclamation plantings used exotic grass seed • Landowners and agencies desired native seeds for these uses, but could not obtain them History Texas Native Seeds • Allow multiple use of the landscape • Best meet habitat requirements of wildlife • Support today’s economic opportunities (hunting, wildlife, ecotourism, and other forms of outdoor recreation) • Facilitate ecosystem services (water, pollination, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, clean air, etc.) Why native plants? • Few (if any) demonstrated benefits to wildlife • Limit biodiversity and multiple use • Tendency to spread from areas they are planted to • Gradual, yet profound alteration of ecosystem processes • Shift in landowner goals and objectives • Change in economic factors benefitting ranches Why not exotic plants? Mimic nature Layer Still needs some care Set up Plants native to your area Preferably from seed or plant stock from your area Proven releases or cultivars for your area Grasses that meet your criteria (annual, perennial, warm season, cool season) What plants should I use? Desired look Size Desired maintenance Water requirements Desired timeline
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico Range Plants
    New Mexico Range Plants Circular 374 Revised by Christopher D. Allison and Nick Ashcroft1 Cooperative Extension Service • College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences New Mexico contains almost 78 million acres, more than 90 percent of which is in native vegetation grazed by domestic livestock and wildlife. The kinds of plants that grow on a range, along with their quality and quan- tity, determine its value. A successful rancher knows the plants on his or her range. There are more than 3,000 species of plants in New Mexico. The 85 discussed here are most important to the livestock industry. Most of these are native plants. RANGELAND AREAS OF NEW MEXICO Figure 1 represents the major rangeland areas in New Mexico. The northern desert, western plateau, and high valley areas are enough alike to be described together, as are the central and high plains areas and the southern desert and basin. Southern Desert and Basin 36 - New Mexico and Arizona Plateaus and Mesas 37 - San Juan River Valley, mesas and Plateaus The southern desert and basin occupies much of south- 39 - Arizona and New Mexico Mountains 41 - Southeastern Arizona Basin and Range 42 - Southern Desertic Basins, Plains and Mountains ern New Mexico at elevations between 3,000 and 5,000 48 - Southern Rocky Mountains 51 - High Intermountain Valleys feet. This area follows the Rio Grande north into the 70 - Pecos/Canadian Plains and Valleys southern part of Sandoval County. 77 - Southern High Plains Some of the most common plants are creosote bush (Larrea tridentata [DC.] Coville), mesquite (Prosopis Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Smith Family of Baja California by Donna Przecha
    Smith Family of Baja California by Donna Przecha San Diego, California July 2012 1 Smith Family of Baja California Donna Przecha _______________________________________________________________________________________________ This is an update of research notes on the family of Thomas Smith and Maria Meza. After sending out the initial report many researchers submitted further information. This report is mainly limited to the children and grandchildren of Thomas and Maria but some lines have been extended a bit further. We did discover that there is a lot of good research that has been done by several family members, much of it well documented. Harry Crosby and I hope that someone will be interested in using this information as a starting point for a more complete history of the family, including later generations. I will admit that the documentation is not complete. It is more a question of indicating where or to whom to go for complete source information. The census information is brief, usually only a year and place. Most people access census returns now through an index, rather than through districts, EDs, pages, etc. I have listed the people as I found them, usually in Ancestry.com or Heritage Quest, even if the spelling is incorrect since this is the way they are indexed. The endnotes are embedded so that it is easy to see the source. To save space and make reading easier, I have used “Guia Familiar” rather than the complete citation: Pablo L. Martínez, Guía Familiar de Baja California, 1700-1900 (Mexico, D.F.: Editorial Baja California, 1965). Many of the references to Guía Familiar are left in Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    GRASSES of Las Cienegas National Conservation Area (version 1.0) Original Concept Gita Bodner Grass Collection and photocopying Kay Fagan Cover Design Rose Manchon Assembly Joy Fisher Betty Harris Jo Haslett Nina Tout Ron Tiller Linda Vaught Introduction: The Las Cienegas National Conservation Area hosts one of the finest grassland valleys left in the southwestern US. This grassland watershed supports some ten miles of perennial stream—a rare gem of green running through southern Arizona’s arid landscape. Together these grasslands and wetlands provide homes for a remarkable array of wildlife, including over 230 bird species, 60 mammals, 40 reptiles and amphibians, and at least five endangered species. Humans have made their living here for 10,000 years or more. This area is also part of one of Arizona’s oldest working ranches, the Empire Ranch, in operation since the 1860’s. Members of the surrounding community care deeply about this landscape, and involve themselves in conservation and management concerns through the Sonoita Valley Planning Partnership and other local groups. The Bureau of Land Management recognized these natural and cultural resource values when it acquired this parcel in 1988, managed it as the Empire-Cienega Conservation Area, and worked with stakeholders to develop an ecosystem management plan for the site. The U.S. Congress further recognized the site as a national treasure, elevating its designation to the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area in 2001. In 2004, the Bureau of Land Management invited The Nature Conservancy to help develop strong and efficient science tools for the site’s adaptive management program.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Hispanic Occupance in the Valley of Sonora, Mexico: Archaeological Confirmations of Early Spanish Reports
    Pre-Hispanic Occupance in the Valley of Sonora, Mexico: Archaeological Confirmations of Early Spanish Reports Item Type Book; text Authors Doolittle, William E. Publisher University of Arizona Press (Tucson, AZ) Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents Download date 24/09/2021 00:20:07 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/582060 ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA NUMBER 48 Pre-Hispanic Occupance in the Valley of Sonora, Mexico Archaeological Confirmation of Early Spanish Reports William E. Doolittle THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA PRESS TUCSON 1988 About the Author WILLIAM E. OOOLITILE, a geographer, has conducted field work in northern Mexico, especially in Sonora, and in Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. His principal interest is cultural ecology, particularly the analysis of prehistoric and traditional present-day agricultural ecosystems, land use pat­ terns, and settlements. He obtained Bachelor's degrees in government and geography from Texas Christian University (1974), a Master's degree from the University of Missouri­ Columbia (1976), and his Doctor of Philosophy degree from the University of Oklahoma (1979). Although his graduate degrees are in geography, he received extensive training in anthropology. He was Assistant Professor of Geology and Geography at Mississippi State University for two years prior to moving to the University of Texas at Austin in 1981, where he is an Associate Professor of Geography. He has published papers on prehistoric and traditional agriculture and agricultural development theory. Cover: Aerial view of the Valley of Sonora near the town of Banamichi. The hilltop feature at center, Cerro Batonapa, is a cerro de trinchera site, Son K:4:220U.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Management of the Madrean
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Characteristics and Consequences of Invasion by Sweet Resin Bush into the Arid Southwestern United States Elizabeth A. Pierson and Joseph R. McAuliffe1 Abstract.-Eutyops multifidus (sweet resin bush), a shrubby composite native to South Africa, was introduced to the arid southwestern United States in 1935 by the USDA Soil Conservation Service. The spread of this shrub represents one of the most serious threats to the ecological integrity and economic value of several ecosystems in the semiarid Southwest. In southern Arizona, this shrub readily invades vegetationally intact, semi-arid grasslands and eventually forms virtually uninterrupted monocultures from which native grasses, shrubs, and succulents are almost completely excluded. Study of plant responses at the advancing front of the areas occupied by sweet resin bush demonstrated that death of native species is linked to the spread of this exotic shrub. These dramatic vegetation alterations are persistent and lead to a variety of additional detrimental changes, including marked increases in soil erosion. We have identified the climatic, vegetation, elevation, and soil characteristics of sites that are susceptible to invasion by E. multifidus. In southern Arizona sweet resin bush can occur in vegetation ranging from Sonoran Desert at low elevation (ca. 850-1060 m) to grasslands, chaparral, and woodland at higher elevation (ca. 1300+ m). In grassland, this shrub can invade a wide variety of different soil types, ranging from loamy calcic soils typically occupied by stands of black grama (Bouteloua eriopoda) to heavy clay soils occupied by tobosa (Hilaria mutica) and curly mesquite (H.
    [Show full text]
  • Bastrop County Grasses Only As of February 21, 2014 Common Name Scientific Name Grass Family Poaceae
    Bastrop County Grasses Only As of February 21, 2014 This checklist of the vascular plants of Bastrop County is primarily based on the collections in the herbarium at Plant Resource Center (PRC), University of Texas, Austin. Additional records were added from the USDA files, historic plant lists from Bastrop and Buescher State Parks (including the Stengl Research Station), recent McKinney Roughs Natural Area bio-surveys, and from the Bill Carr post-fire survey in 2012. Special codes used: asterisk (*) USDA, percent (%) Bill Carr, pound sign (#) added to the PRC from surveys. Rare plants listed from Rare Plants of Texas by Poole, et.al. are indicated with an exclamation point (!). New Biota of North Ameaica (BONAP) modern family names have an ampersand (&). Species marked in bold are listed on the Texas Department of Agriculture Noxious Weeds list, on the USDA list, or introduced. Scientific Name Common Name Poaceae Grass Family Agostris hyemalis winter bentgrass # Agostris scabra rough bentgrass # Aira caryophyllea hairgrass Alopecurus caroliniana Carolina foxtail Andropogon gerardii big bluestem Andropogon glomeratus bushy bluestem # Andropogon ternarius split-beard bluestem Andropogon virginicus broomsedge Anthaenantus rufa purple silky scale Aristida affinis three-awn grass Aristida desmantha church mouse three-awn Aristida dichotoma poverty grass Aristida glauca smooth three-awn Aristida lanosa woolly three-awn Aristida longespica slim-spike three-awn Aristida oligantha old-field three-awn Aristida purpurascens arrow feather three-awn
    [Show full text]