DOCSLIB.ORG

An Approach to the Choice of a Supply Management Model in Conglomerates Operating at the Markets of Machine-Building Industry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Approach to the Choice of a Supply Management Model in Conglomerates Operating at the Markets of Machine-Building Industry SHS Web of Conferences 28, 01116 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801116 RPTSS 2015 An approach to the Choice of a Supply Management Model in Conglomerates Operating at the Markets of Machine-building industry Gennady D. Antonov1,2, a, Olga P. Ivanova1,2,3 1National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050, Lenin Avenue, 30, Tomsk, Russia 2Kemerovo Institute of Qualification Improvement and Retraining, 650060, Michurina str., 13a, Kemerovo, Russia 3Kemerovo State University, 650060, Krasnaya str., 6, Kemerovo, Russia Abstract. Strategic and managerial analysis shows that currently many conglomerates including those in the machine-building industry do not have established approaches to formation of a purchasing management system for their primary activity; some problems of purchasing model choice methodology lack theoretical development. In the given work the authors specify the list, the characteristics and the combination of estimated macrofactors influencing the choice of the principal supply model for the purposes of forming an optimal purchasing system of conglomerates. Supply management functions are distributed within the supply system of the holding company Introduction all, associated with centralization optimization and decentralization of purchasing functions. Conglomerates are capable of better exploitation of sources of values dealing with various business areas in a more efficient way than it is done by specialized Analysis of the methods of corporate companies. At the same time the conglomerates face the purchasing systems organization problem of company structuring and running for the purposes of the best exploitation of these sources of In the works [3-8] the scientists describe the following values. In spite of the theoretical argumentation for the approaches developed as a result of research aimed at conglomerates consisting of multiple subdivisions and studying the state and methods of building corporate empirical evidence of their efficiency, research shows purchasing systems in some corporations of the USA and that combining advantages of decentralization and Western Europe: coordination is still a problem for conglomerates [1]. 1. An approach based on the combination of two Henry Mintzberg [2] highlights two structural macrofactors: homogeneity of companies (similarity of peculiarities of conglomerates including a number of such characteristics as purchased assortment, capital subdivisions which limit decentralization and their funds used, climatic conditions, common suppliers, etc.) ability to adapt. First, limitation of decentralization and development of a purchasing structure at every reveals itself in limiting the freedom-to-operate of company; subdivision managers by the headquarters in case of 2. An approach supposing purchasing a model choice variations in the subdivision activities. Second, the depending upon the combination of such factors as problems of coexistence of different inside cultures and development of a purchasing function and corporate management systems of various subdivisions, an coherency revealing itself in closeness of company opportunity of differentiation according to their business management systems for the companies included into the requirements face management standardization at the corporation, similarities in their business culture, subdivision level implemented by means of common existence of corporate ideology and politics; monitor systems, processes of development control, 3. An approach reflecting dependence of financial corporate culture. Besides, analysis of conglomerates results of the corporation on supply chain management functioning practice, including those at the markets of under the conditions of certain fullness of supply machine-building industry, provides evidence that we functions and a degree of finished product uniqueness. need solution of problems of choosing a corporate model Depending on the paired combination of macrofactor of corporate purchasing management, which are, first of data assessment the practicability of centralization, a Corresponding author: [email protected] © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). SHS Web of Conferences 28, 01116 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801116 RPTSS 2015 decentralization or a hybrid purchasing model approach as it is to a conglomerate leads to a wrong (cooperation, shared purchasing controlled by the choice of the supply model. leading buying agent of one of the companies) is determined. The advantages of the given approaches include not only easiness and application of only two Results generalized parameters in each of them but also the Basing on the considered approaches, taking their application of a simple scale of factor assessment: high- advantages and disadvantages into consideration, let us low. formulate the rules of selecting the principle model of When estimating the opportunities of applying the supply organization in a conglomerate by means of given approaches to determining the purchasing model specifying the list, combinations and characteristics of in a conglomerate we should analyze the result of the use the estimated macrofactors. The specified list and of mentioned factors choice rules. Thus, for example, characteristics of macrofactors are presented in Table 1. application of the first approach, based on the As in a conglomerate homogeneity of subdivisions, a combination of homogeneity of the companies and priori low application of the given factor is senseless. development of a purchasing structure in every company We should estimate the possibility of synergy from the to determine the model of purchasing management in a combination of different branches subdivision potentials conglomerate, brought us to the following conclusions. for manufacturing new, unique, competitive products First, in respect to a conglomerate there arises the including machine-building one. We consider it possible necessity of correcting the factor “homogeneity of the to estimate both fullness and development of the supply company”. It is reasonable to apply only the similarity of function as an integrated macrofactor. Development of such characteristics as purchased assortment, climatic the supply function to a certain extent is impossible conditions and common suppliers for a conglomerate, without fullness of applied subfunctions of supply. Thus, including the one in machine-building industry. Second, from five macrofactors considered for selecting a according to the rule of supply, the model choice for the corporate supply model we highlight three: corporate given approach, high homogeneity of the companies and coherence, development and fullness of supply function, a well-developed supply function determines the uniqueness of a manufactured product. necessity of decentralization as decentralized supply services are capable of ensuring the purchasing process Table 1. The list and the characteristics of the factors of on their own and, thus, are more likely to ignore the selecting a supply model for a conglomerate operating at the supply subdivision in the corporate centre. Therefore, the machine-building industry market given approach does not take into consideration the opportunity of obtaining advantages from supply Macrofactor Factor Factor characteristic centralization due to consolidation of purchase amount, i.e. reducing purchasing prices and costs associated with decentralized supply services operating. According to the rules of choice in the second approach Corporate Independence of Limited independence (a combination of factors “corporate coherence” and coherence subdivisions of subdivisions “development of supply function”), in case of having the Having a Complexity of strategic corporate planning for a corporate strategy, similarity of organizational structures strategy conglomerate of the companies, i.e. having high corporate coherence Single Complexity of and development of supply function (for example when accounting implementing single each subdivision has its own supply subdivision), the policy accounting policy process of purchasing should be centralized. Thus the Single A possibility of given approach does not take into account the personnel conducting single peculiarities of supplying the subdivisions of a policy. personnel policy and conglomerate, such as wide purchased assortment which Single system implementing the is especially characteristic of supply market of machine- of education. general diversified system of education building subdivisions. Planning of Planning of financial According to the rules of supply, the model choice in activities results and growth areas the third approach (combination of factors – fullness of at the conglomerate supply functions and the degree of finished product level. uniqueness) means that supply centralization is Common use of Using single transport advantageous for manufacturing relatively widespread or the same corridors (internal and raw products, whereas decentralization – for transport external) in the situation manufacturing of a unique product. Within a corridors of spatial unity, spatial conglomerate, product characteristics in terms of juxtaposition uniqueness/abundance differ for every subdivision. The Developme The quality of As a rule, with respect given aspect, first of all, is characteristic for corporations nt and supply function to different subdivisions fullness
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transforming the Retail Supply Chain Apparel, Fashion and Footwear GS1 Standards in Action
    Transforming the Retail Supply Chain Apparel, Fashion and Footwear GS1 Standards in Action Collaborating in the dynamic retail industry In today’s omni-channel retail world, consumers are in control. They have embraced social media, online search and mobile apps—giving them instant access to product information to make buying decisions. Consumers are driving a retail environment where fast fashion translates to high-speed product turnover and a vast number of stock-keeping units that must be managed. On the supply side, retail production is complex and “ Implementing EPC-enabled truly global in scope where brands and manufacturers alike source materials and labour from a worldwide network of suppliers. RFID technology has been This dynamic retail industry calls for increased collaboration across the one of the most significant supply chain for improved speed-to-market capabilities and efficiencies. technological steps Partners in the apparel, fashion and footwear (AFF) sector are looking to inventory management and procurement processes to help drive Macy’s has taken toward these improvements. improving our supply Inventory Accuracy with EPC/RFID chain performance, and Industry leaders are starting to “tag at the source” by applying GS1 ultimately our customer EPC-enabled RFID tags on items at the point of manufacture. Using service, in the last 20 years. standards-based product identifiers—Serialised Global Trade Item Numbers (SGTINs) encoded into EPC tags, manufacturers can provide true visibility It is one of the keys to our of merchandise as it travels to distribution centres and stores. omni-channel success, and Brand owners utilise EPCs to easily verify the accuracy and completeness because we’ve already of shipments received—each identified by a GS1 Serial Shipping Container Code (SSCC)—and can track shipping processes to reduce counterfeits seen solid results, we from entering the supply chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnerships Alan J.B
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1978 Choice of Entities for Holding Real Estate: Partnerships Alan J.B. Aronsohn Repository Citation Aronsohn, Alan J.B., "Choice of Entities for Holding Real Estate: Partnerships" (1978). William & Mary Annual Tax Conference. 482. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/tax/482 Copyright c 1978 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/tax CHOICES OF ENTITIES FOR HOLDING REAL ESTATE: PARTNERSHIPS By ALAN J. B. ARONSOHN The widespread utilization in recent years of the partnership form for holding real estate has been attributable to a beneficient combination of local and federal income tax laws. In earlier, simpler days, title to real estate beneficially owned by groups of individuals was more likely to be vested in a corporation or some form of trust. The primary reason for the conveyancer's preference for corporate or trust ownership of record title, as opposed to vesting title in multiple owners as tenants- in-common or as partners, was the increased ease and certainty of dealing with real property title complexities where title to the real property was vested in a separate entity (i.e., a corporation or trustee) insulated from the infirmities which might affect individual owners, such as the death, bankruptcy or incompetency of one or more of them. While the corporate or trust form retains these advantages, the increasing burden of income taxation upon the ownership of all invest- ment property and, particularly upon corporate investments, has induced the real property lawyers to search for alternatives to corporate and trust ownership which satisfy both the requirements of the practical conveyancer and at the same time ameliorate the tax burdens im- posed upon corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Procurement Professionals Should Be Engaged in Supply Chain
    business solutions for a sustainable world WBCSD Future Leaders Team (FLT) 2011 Why procurement professionals should be engaged in supply chain sustainability “The Future Leaders Team is an unparalleled of common challenges – across sectors – and learning experience for young managers of WBCSD shared best practices. Above all, they experienced member companies. They have the opportunity to what is recommended here: engaging people in understand the benefits of why sustainability matters sustainability. I am convinced that they brought back to business and to develop a solid international valuable knowledge and information to their jobs.“ and professional network. Sustainability is complex subject is some cases, and it is therefore crucial for Congratulations to Eugenia Ceballos, John Zhao, multinational companies to enrich their work with Baptiste Raymond, and to all participants of the other companies’ experiences through collaboration. Future Leaders Team 2011! FLT 2011’s theme was sustainability in the supply chain, which is increasingly considered as an area of direct responsibility for companies. The following report reflects FLTs’ peer learning experience and team work. This is not the work of experts or consultants. Rather, the three managers from DuPont China, Holcim and Lafarge, took this opportunity Kareen Rispal, to engage with key people across functions and Lafarge Senior Vice President, geographies within their companies. In doing Sustainable Development so, they have deepened their understanding and Public Affairs I. Why procurement functions all stakeholders involved in bringing products and services to market. should be engaged in sustainability for their We believe that a sustainable supply chain can drive supply chain: competition and profit, and is a great opportunity to make a difference to companies, communities 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking & Finance
    BANKING & FINANCE ALERT DEFINITIONS OF ENTITIES OPERATING IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR FEBRUARY 2016 A number of parent companies of industrial and • Parent Undertaking which: commercial groups have recently been notified by undertaking - has a majority of the the ACPR of their status as a "mixed-activity Article 4, point 15 shareholders' or members' holding company", thereby discovering the jungle of the CRR voting rights in an of statuses related to financial activities. undertaking (subsidiary), - or has the right to appoint or Context and scope of the memorandum remove a majority of the members of the The "CRD IV Package", composed of Directive No. administrative, 2013/36/EU of June 26, 2013 (hereinafter the management or supervisory CRD IV Directive), and EU Regulation No. 575/2013 body of the subsidiary, and of June 26, 2013 (hereinafte r C RR), has modified is at the same time a the definitions of the different entities carrying out shareholder in or member of an activity in the financial sector, either directly or that subsidiary, through companies controlled or in which they hold - or has the right to exercise a a stake. dominant influence over the The purpose of this alert is to review these new subsidiary pursuant to a definitions, often little known, and the scope of contract or to a provision in these statuses. its articles of association, - or is a shareholder or Definitions resulting from the CRD IV member and a majority of Package the members of the administrative, These definitions can be found both in the CRR management or supervisory bodies of the subsidiary Regulation and in the Monetary and Financial Code have been appointed solely (MFC).
    [Show full text]
  • Unit : V (Accounts of Holding Company) Holding Company
    Unit : V (Accounts of Holding Company) Holding Company : Section 2(46) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines Holding Company. The company is said to be the holding company if that particular company holds/owns at least 50% of the other companies and has the authority to make management decisions, influences and controls the company’s board of directors. A holding company may exist for the sole purpose of controlling and managing subsidiary companies. Subsidiary Company : Section 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines the Subsidiary Company. The subsidiary company is the company that is controlled by the holding or parent company. It is defined as a company/body corporate where the holding company controls the composition of the Board of Directors. As per the Companies Amendment Act, 2017, Section 2(87)(ii), if the holding company have control over more than one-half of the voting power of another company, that particular company will be identified as the subsidiary company. Advantages of holding company : 1. Benefits of Amalgamation : The group as a whole benefited by reaping the fruits of amalgamation keeping their separate entity and goodwill of the individual companies. 2. Benefits of Decentralization : By opening subsidiaries in different areas, a holding company reap the benefits of decentralization. 3. Benefits of Monopolies : Fruits of monopoly or near monopoly can be enjoyed without making the public aware of the existence of combination of the units. 4. Tax benefits : Subsidiary companies maintain their separate identities; therefore, loss can be carried forward for the income tax purpose. 5. Effective utilization of Resources : A holding company holding different subsidiary companies may evaluate the functions of each company and takes actions on the basis of their performance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Supply Chain Management Strategy on Operational and Financial Performance
    sustainability Article The Effect of Supply Chain Management Strategy on Operational and Financial Performance Rok Lee Department of LINC Plus Project Organization, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea; [email protected]; Tel.: +82-10-6314-4004 Abstract: Given that small and medium manufacturing enterprises (SMEs) are key to national eco- nomic development, the application of supply chain strategies that support their sustainability is critical. This study aims to identify the effects of supply chain management (SCM) on the operational performance of SMEs in Korea, specifically considering organizational competencies. To achieve this, an empirical survey was conducted on 300 Korean manufacturing SMEs that had introduced SCM strategies. The relationships between the variables were analyzed through structural equation modeling. These show that specific SCM strategies and organizational competencies had a significant effect on overall business performance. Furthermore, the SCM strategies had a significant effect on SME organizational competencies. Additionally, we analyzed the mediating effect of organiza- tional competencies on the effect of SCM strategy on overall business performance. We found that organizational competence mediated the effect of SCM strategy on operational performance, but not on financial performance. The study shows that introducing SCM strategies directly improves business performance and is closely related to competencies such as research and development, technology commercialization, production capability, and marketing capabilities. Consequently, a combination of SCM strategies and organizational competencies can generate sustainable overall business performance among SMEs. Citation: Lee, R. The Effect of Supply Chain Management Strategy on Keywords: supply chain management strategy; operational performance; financial performance; Operational and Financial manufacturing firms; Korea Performance. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5138.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Chain Social and Environmental Responsibility Is an Important Part of Our Business Relationships with Our Suppliers
    2012 Corporate Responsibility Report ibm.com/ibm/responsibility/2012 Supply Chain Social and environmental responsibility is an important part of our business relationships with our suppliers. We work closely with them to encourage sustained improvement throughout our global supply chain and across various aspects of corporate responsibility. In this section you will find examples of how we set requirements for the companies we do business with, grow the global diversity of our supply base and collaborate with industry groups and stakeholders. IBM 2012 Corporate Responsibility Report 2 Contents Supply Chain ...........................................................................................3 Supplier Assessment and Improvement Plans............................................................6 Industry Collaboration..................................................................................12 Conflict Minerals .......................................................................................13 Supplier Diversity ......................................................................................14 IBM 2012 Corporate Responsibility Report / Supply Chain 3 Supply Chain With suppliers located in close to 100 countries, social and environmental responsibility is a major facet of our corporate responsibility efforts and we have incorporated this into our business relationships with our valued suppliers. IBM’s supply chain is a strategic asset that helps us deliver consistently high-quality goods and services to our customers
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Interpretations (Bhc Act)
    BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF'THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, O. Co 20551 SCOTT G. ALVAREZ GENERAL COUNSEL May 10, 2010 Michael N. Delune, Esq. Aldrich & Bonnefin Box 19686 Irvine, CA 92623-1029 Dear Mr. Delune: This is in response to your letter regarding whether a proposed assignment of an economic interest in the partnership interests of a partnership that is a qualified family partnership ("QFP") under section 2(0)(10) of the Bank Holding Company Act ("BHC Act") would cause the partnership to lose its status as a QFP.l C ] a QFP under the BHC Act, indirectly controls [ J("( JBank")? One of the partners of( J is the r .. ::l Trust ("Trust"). t ], a Trust beneficiary, has passed away, and you have inquired as to whether the assignment of an economic interest in t J interests that are held by the Trust to a third party who is not a related family member would cause [ J to lose its status as a QFP. You have indicated that such an assignment would not include the voting interests in such!: ] partnership interests. 1 12 U.S.C. § 1841(0)(10). 2 [ J 2 Under the BRC Act, any "company" (including a partnership) that controls a bank is considered a BRC.3 The BRC Act, however, provides a limited exemption from the definition of company for a QFP, and accordingly a partnership that qualifies as a QFP is not considered a BRC under the BRC Act.4 In order to qualify under the BRC Act as a QFP, all the partners of a QFP must be "individuals related to each other by blood, marriage ...or adoption" or "trusts for the primary benefit of' such individuals (collectively, "qualified parties").
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Supply Chain: Supply Chain 2020
    Supply Chain 2020 Next generation supply chain: Supply chain 2020 July 2013 Copyright © 2013, by McKinsey & Company, Inc. Next generation supply chain: Supply chain 2020 Knut Alicke Balaji Iyer 2 Next generation supply chain Supply chain 2020 3 Contents Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 7 1. Key trends shaping supply chains 9 2. Implications for the next generation supply chain 15 4 Next generation supply chain Supply chain 2020 5 Acknowledgements We would like to thank Sumit Dutta, a partner in our Mumbai office, and Muthiah Venkateswaran, an associate partner in our Chennai office, for their contributions to this whitepaper. We would like to thank Insa Mareen Wente, a consultant based in our Hamburg office; Kerstin Kubik, a knowledge expert based in our Vienna office; and Markus Leopoldseder, a director of knowledge (supply chain management) based in our Vienna office, for their contributions. We would also like to thank Vineeta Rai for the editorial support; Kulsum Merchant for the support in external relations; J Sathya Kumar and Nipun Gosain for their visual aids support. This whitepaper is not based on any primary research that we conducted; it synthesises our perspectives gained from past research and experience in serving multiple stakeholders of supply chains over many years. For the experience and perspectives, we acknowledge our supply chain practice without whose efforts this whitepaper could not have been published. Finally, we would like to thank the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and CII Institute of Logistics for the opportunity and the forum to provide our perspective on supply chain evolution. This work is independent and has not been commissioned or sponsored in any way by any business, government or other institution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of Capitalism Through Global Value Chains
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 2 2019 The Crisis of Capitalism Through Global Value Chains Ronald W. Cox Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Cox, Ronald W. (2019) "The Crisis of Capitalism Through Global Value Chains," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.7.1.008317 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol7/iss1/2 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Crisis of Capitalism Through Global Value Chains Abstract Reprinted from Chapter Five of Ronald W. Cox, Corporate Power, Class Conflict and the Crisis of the New Globalization, Lexington Book, 2019 Transnational corporate power within global value chains has been a byproduct of features that have long been inherent to global capitalism. The first is a built-in tendency of capitalism owart d falling rates of profit that lead to structural crises within the system. The second is the increased concentration of capitalist ownership as a response to the falling rates of profit and the imperatives of capitalist accumulation. The third is an inherent tendency of capitalist owners of production to look to foreign markets and increased exploitation of workers as “solutions” to capitalist crises.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supply Chain Manager's Handbook
    THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGER’S HANDBOOK A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH COMMODITIES 2017 JSI THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGER’S HANDBOOK A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH COMMODITIES ABOUT JSI THE SUPPLY CHAIN John Snow, Inc. (JSI) is a U.S.-based health care consulting firm committed to improving the health of individuals and communities worldwide. Our multidisciplinary staff works in partnership MANAGER’S HANDBOOK with host-country experts, organizations, and governments to make quality, accessible health care a reality for children, women, and men around the world. JSI’s headquarters are in Boston, A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE MANAGEMENT Massachusetts, with U.S. offices in Washington, D.C.; Atlanta, Georgia; Burlington, Vermont; Concord, New Hampshire; Denver, Colorado; Providence, Rhode Island; and San Francisco, OF HEALTH COMMODITIES California. JSI also maintains offices in more than 40 countries throughout the developing world. RECOMMENDED CITATION John Snow, Inc. 2017. The Supply Chain Manager’s Handbook, A Practical Guide to the Management of Health Commodities. Arlington, Va.: John Snow, Inc. ABSTRACT The Supply Chain Manager’s Handbook: A Practical Guide to the Management of Health Commodities is the starting point for anyone interested in learning about and understanding the key principles and concepts of supply chain management for health commodities. Concepts described in this handbook will help those responsible for improving, revising, designing, and operating all or part of a supply chain. John Snow, Inc. (JSI) has written The Supply Chain Manager’s Handbook based on more than 30 years of experience improving public health supply chains in more than 60 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Chain Sustainability a Strategic Responsibility
    Supply Chain Sustainability A Strategic Responsibility Social media The supply chain function has evolved significantly over the past decade, has put supply becoming a key strategic pillar of business. Going beyond its core role chain risk in of delivering goods on time, in full, it has a vital role to play in customer the spotlight experience and brand perception. Supply chain now has a seat in the boardroom in many organisations. Barely a week goes by without a supply chain issue - be it supplier failure or reputational risk - hitting the headlines and the share price. The proliferation and influence of social media has put supply chain risk and sustainability firmly in the spotlight. Companies are publicly held to account for the actions of all tiers of their supply chain. This is why companies must lead the way on sustainability issues, to mitigate economic, social and environmental impact. Beyond the risk however, there are significant strategic advantages to acting sustainably. 2 [email protected] | www.odgersberndtson.co.uk Supply Chain Sustainability The sustainability discussion evolved Sustainability in the supply chain is 80% from purely focusing on companies taking increasingly seen among senior executives of global trade from society and wanting to give back, to as essential to delivering long-term passes through realising there are risks to compliance and profitability. A sustainable supply chain supply chains reputation. captures value creation opportunities and offers significant competitive advantages Sustainability issues are often supply chain for early adopters and process innovators. issues. For example, the introduction of the At the same time, supply chain is one of Modern Slavery Act is to ensure that slavery the key components for organisations and human trafficking is not taking place in to create a positive impact in the world, businesses or supply chains.
    [Show full text]