DOCSLIB.ORG

Standard Protocol Upon Discovery of Injured Birds and Bats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standard Protocol Upon Discovery of Injured Birds and Bats NA PUA MAKANI WIND ENERGY PROJECT DRAFT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Prepared for Na Pua Makani Power Partners, LLC Prepared by February 2015 TTCES-PTLD-2015-009 DRAFT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN This page intentionally left blank DRAFT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicant History and Information ............................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Project History ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Project Components .............................................................................................................. 4 1.3.3 Project Schedule .................................................................................................................... 8 1.3.4 List of Preparers .................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Regulatory Framework and Relationship to Other Plans, Policies, and Laws .............................. 8 1.4.1 Federal Endangered Species Act ........................................................................................... 8 1.4.2 National Environmental Policy Act ...................................................................................... 9 1.4.3 Migratory Bird Treaty Act .................................................................................................. 10 1.4.4 National Historic Preservation Act ..................................................................................... 10 1.4.5 Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS Chapter 195D) ................................................................... 10 1.4.6 Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS Chapter 343) ...................................................................... 11 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN ...................................................... 11 2.1 Purpose and Need for the HCP ................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Scope and Term .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.1 HCP Scope .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 HCP Term ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Surveys and Resources................................................................................................................ 12 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................................................................ 13 3.1 Regional Location ....................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Land Use Designations ............................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Topography and Geology............................................................................................................ 13 3.4 Soils............................................................................................................................................. 13 3.5 Hydrology and Water Resources ................................................................................................ 15 3.6 Terrestrial Flora .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.7 Non-Listed Wildlife .................................................................................................................... 15 3.8 Listed Wildlife ............................................................................................................................ 16 3.8.1 Hawaiian Hoary Bat ............................................................................................................ 17 Na Pua Makani Wind Energy Project i DRAFT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 3.8.2 Newell’s Shearwater ........................................................................................................... 19 3.8.3 Hawaiian Goose .................................................................................................................. 25 3.8.4 Waterbirds ........................................................................................................................... 26 3.8.5 Hawaiian Short-eared Owl .................................................................................................. 35 3.8.6 Species Considered but Excluded ....................................................................................... 37 4 GOALS AND CONSERVATION MEASURES ............................................................................... 38 4.1 Biological Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................. 38 4.1.1 Goals ................................................................................................................................... 38 4.1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 38 4.2 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts .................................................................................... 39 4.2.1 Project Components and Siting Considerations .................................................................. 39 4.2.2 General Project Development Measures ............................................................................. 40 5 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND TAKE LIMITS ................................................ 41 5.1 Hawaiian Hoary bat .................................................................................................................... 41 5.1.1 Direct Take .......................................................................................................................... 41 5.1.2 Indirect Take ....................................................................................................................... 42 5.1.3 Authorized Take Request for ITP and ITL ......................................................................... 43 5.1.4 Assessment of Population-Level Impacts ........................................................................... 44 5.2 Newell’s Shearwater ................................................................................................................... 45 5.2.1 Direct Take .......................................................................................................................... 45 5.2.2 Indirect Take ....................................................................................................................... 47 5.2.3 Authorized Take Request for the ITP and ITL ................................................................... 47 5.2.4 Assessment of Population-Level Impacts ........................................................................... 48 5.3 Hawaiian Goose .......................................................................................................................... 48 5.3.1 Direct Take .......................................................................................................................... 48 5.3.2 Indirect Take ....................................................................................................................... 49 5.3.3 Authorized Take Request for ITP and ITL ......................................................................... 50 5.3.4 Assessment of Population-Level Impacts ........................................................................... 50 5.4 Waterbirds (Hawaiian Duck, Hawaiian Stilt, Hawaiian Coot, Hawaiian Moorhen) .................. 51 5.4.1 Direct Take .......................................................................................................................... 51 5.4.2 Indirect Take ....................................................................................................................... 52 5.4.3 Authorized Take Request for the ITP and ITL ................................................................... 52 5.4.4 Assessment of Population-Level Impacts ........................................................................... 52 Na Pua Makani Wind Energy Project ii DRAFT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 5.5 Hawaiian Short-eared Owl .......................................................................................................... 52 5.5.1 Direct Take .......................................................................................................................... 52 5.5.2 Indirect Take ....................................................................................................................... 53 5.5.3 Authorized Take Request for the ITP and ITL ................................................................... 54 5.5.4 Assessment of Population-Level Impacts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Common Waxbills Are Regarded As Resident Throughout Their Range (Maclean 1993B), Wandering Only in Times of Severe Drought (Ginn Et Al
    612 Estrildidae: twinspots, firefinches, waxbills and mannikins Movements: There is no firm evidence for seasonal movements in the models. Although reporting rates dip slightly in mid- to late winter in several Zones, this is likely to be the result of seasonal changes in flocking behaviour and forag- ing range. Common Waxbills are regarded as resident throughout their range (Maclean 1993b), wandering only in times of severe drought (Ginn et al. 1989). Breeding: Atlas data indicate breeding mostly December–April in the summer-rainfall areas (Zones 5–8), avoiding the dry winter months of June–September, which is in agreement with previously published data (Irwin 1981; Tarboton et al. 1987b), except that data for KwaZulu-Natal (Zone 7) (Dean 1971) indicate that significant breeding can occur in November. In the winter- rainfall area of the southwestern Cape Province (Zone 4), it breeds mainly September–December, with records extending into May (cf. Winterbottom 1968a). Common Waxbill Although it is closely associated with less seasonal en- Rooibeksysie vironments, such as permanent water and human habitation, it remains dependent on seasonally available seeding grass Estrilda astrild heads and insects, for nestbuilding and food (pers. obs). Interspecific relationships: The Common Waxbill is The Common Waxbill is a widespread and adaptable estrildid the primary host of the Pintailed Whydah Vidua macroura. which ranges throughout sub-Saharan Africa in many mesic The ranges of the two species coincide closely, although the habitats (Hall & Moreau 1970). Its southern African distrib- waxbill is apparently better able to colonize dry areas of the ution is concentrated in the Afromontane and coastal zones Karoo, northern Cape Province and Namibia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Waxbill As a Case Study
    Biology Department Research Group Terrestrial Ecology _____________________________________________________________________________ A MECHANISTIC VIEW OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS: THE COMMON WAXBILL AS A CASE STUDY Michaël Goedertier Student number: 01303412 Supervisor: Dr. Diederik Strubbe Counsellor: Prof. Dr. Luc Lens Master’s dissertation submitted to obtain the degree of Master of Science in Biology Academic year: 2019 - 2020 © Faculty of Sciences – research group Terrestrial Ecology All rights reserved. This thesis contains confidential information and confidential research results that are property to the UGent. The contents of this master thesis may under no circumstances be made public, nor complete or partial, without the explicit and preceding permission of the UGent representative, i.e. the supervisor. The thesis may under no circumstances be copied or duplicated in any form, unless permission granted in written form. Any violation of the confidential nature of this thesis may impose irreparable damage to the UGent. In case of a dispute that may arise within the context of this declaration, the Judicial Court of Gent only is competent to be notified. 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Global change and biological invasions ...................................................................................... 4 1.2. Species Distribution Models .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Estrilda Astrild Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species Profile Estrilda Astrild. Available
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Estrilda astrild Estrilda astrild System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Aves Passeriformes Estrildidae Common name avadavat (English, Saint Helena), red-cheeked waxbill (English), waxbill (English), common waxbill (English) Synonym Similar species Summary The common waxbill, Estrilda astrild is native to tropical and southern Africa, but has been introduced to many island nations where it has shown mixed success in establishment. It feeds mainly on grass seeds and is commonly found in open long grass plains and close to human habitation. E. astrild shows a high reproductive rate which is attributed to its ability to naturalize easily. view this species on IUCN Red List Species Description Estrilda astrild tends to move in small flocks (Hughes et al, 1994) and concentrates around human habitation and good vegetation cover. The main foodstuff for E. astrild is mainly grass seeds (Lewis, 2008). The large success of of E. astrild's success in naturalisation in its introduced range is due to its high reproductive rate and being able to breed all year round in certain regions (Reino & Silva, 1998). E. astrild collects carnivore scat and places it around its nests, thus trying to camouflage them from predators (Schuetz, 2004). Habitat Description Estrilda astrild inhabits open country with long grass, reed stands near water, cultivated areas, forest edges and in the vicinity of human habitations (Goodwin 1982; as seen in Reino & Silva, 1998). Nutrition Estrilda astrild feeds mainly on grass seeds (Lewis, 2008). Principal source: Compiler: IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) with support from the Overseas Territories Environmental Programme (OTEP) project XOT603, a joint project with the Cayman Islands Government - Department of Environment Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia & the Okavango
    Pel’s Fishing Owl - a pair was found on a wooded island south of Shakawe (Jan-Ake Alvarsson) NAMIBIA & THE OKAVANGO 21 SEPTEMBER – 8 OCTOBER 2017 LEADER: STEVE BRAINE For most of the country the previous three years drought had been broken and although too early for the mi- grants we did however do very well with birding generally. We searched and found all the near endemics as well as the endemic Dune Lark. Besides these we also had a new write-in for the trip! In the floodplains after observing a wonderful Pel’s Fishing Owl we travelled down a side channel of the Okavango River to look for Pygmy Geese, we were lucky and came across several pairs before reaching a dried-out floodplain. Four birds flew out of the reedbeds and looked rather different to the normal weavers of which there were many, a closer look at the two remaining birds revealed a beautiful pair of Cuckoo Finches. These we all enjoyed for a brief period before they followed the other birds which had now disappeared into the reedbeds. Very strong winds on three of the birding days made birding a huge challenge to say the least after not finding the rare and difficult Herero Chat we had to make alternate arrangements at another locality later in the trip. The entire tour from the Hosea Kutako International Airport outside the capital Windhoek and returning there nineteen days later delivered 375 species. Out of these, four birds were seen only by the leader, a further three species were heard but not seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeleton Coast & Etosha October 2018 Tour Report
    Tour Report Namibia – Skeleton Coast & Etosha 22 October – 3 November 2018 Lionesses Bee-eater Red-billed francolin Kudu Compiled by: Geoff Crane 01305 267 994 [email protected] www.thetravellingnaturalist.com Tour Leader: Geoff Crane Day 1: Arrive at Windhoek Monday 22 October 2018 The plane arrived at the Windhoek International Airport on time and we arrived at our Windhoek lodge in the late afternoon. A cup of tea and time to relax was on the cards. It was a particularly hot and sunny day, and we had a few birds in the lodge gardens. Grey go-away bird (turaco), white-backed mousebird, rock dove, speckled pigeon, Cape turtle and laughing dove, European and Bradfield’s swifts, red-eyed bulbul, white-browed sparrow-weaver and a yellow mongoose were all seen in our lodge gardens. We had an early dinner at Windhoek’s famous Joe’s Beer House before heading back to the guest house for a good night’s sleep. We had some heavy rain during the night, which cooled everything down a bit. Day 2: Windhoek to Waterberg National Park Tuesday 23 October 2018 After a leisurely breakfast we left Windhoek in the rain and headed north towards the bushveld area of the Waterberg Plateau. We saw a few African ostriches in amongst the thorn scrub, and white-backed vultures flying in circles trying to catch a thermal. Other raptors seen as we drove were Wahlberg’s eagle, bateleur, and a pair of Verreaux’s eagles were seen on arrival at our accommodation at the Waterberg camp. Crowned lapwing, Namaqua dove, white-browed sparrow-weaver, house sparrow, grey-headed sparrow, red-billed hornbill and yellow-billed hornbill were also seen en route, as well as a lone male kudu with an impressive set of horns.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON WAXBILL Estrilda Astrild
    COMMON WAXBILL Estrilda astrild Other: St. Helena Waxbill E.a. minor? naturalized (non-native) resident, recently established The Common Waxbill is similar in appearance to the Black-rumped Waxbill, which has also been referred to as "Common Waxbill" and "Red-eared Waxbill", setting up initial confusion about the status of these two species in Hawaii (Ord 1982, Falkenmayer 1988). The Common Waxbill is a native of Africa S of the Sahara (Cramp and Perrins 1994a, AOU 1998), and it has been introduced to many islands in the Indian and Atlantic Oceans (Long 1981, Lever 1987, AOU 1998), and to Tahiti (successfully), Fiji (unsuccessfully), and O'ahu (successfully) in the Pacific (Pratt et al. 1987). On O'ahu, Berger (1979, 1981) first noted a flock of 20-25 waxbills in a cane field near Ewa Beach 7 Nov 1973, which he considered to be "Red-eared" (= Black- rumped) Waxbills at the time, but that were almost certainly Common Waxbills as later determined by Ord (1982). On 17 Dec 1977 five "Red-eared Waxbills" were also noted at Waipi'o Peninsula during the Christmas Bird Count (E 38:90, 91). Subsequently, populations of Common Waxbills in wc. O'ahu continued to increase through the 1980- mid 2010s (see Graph), including a single-location high count 500 near Waipi'o 6 Jul 2005 and 4000 along the Poamoho Trail above Wahiawa 28 Jul 2012. Meanwhile, an individual of what was later determined to be a Common Waxbill (but considered a "Red-eared" Waxbill at the time) was first reported inland from Kuilima Pt near the N tip of the island on 15 Jun 1976 (E 37:9).
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Africa: the Mite Community (Arachnida: Acariformes) of The
    Hernandes and OConnor Parasites & Vectors (2017) 10:299 DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2230-5 RESEARCH Open Access Out of Africa: the mite community (Arachnida: Acariformes) of the common waxbill, Estrilda astrild (Linnaeus, 1758) (Passeriformes: Estrildidae) in Brazil Fabio Akashi Hernandes1* and Barry M. OConnor2 Abstract Background: The common waxbill, Estrilda astrild (L., 1758) (Passeriformes: Estrildidae) is a small passerine bird native to Sub-Saharan Africa that has been introduced into several regions of the world. Results: In the present paper, eight mite species (Acariformes) are reported from this host from Brazil, including three species new to science: Montesauria caravela n. sp., M. conquistador n. sp. (Proctophyllodidae), Trouessartia transatlantica n. sp., T. minuscula Gaud & Mouchet, 1958, T. estrildae Gaud & Mouchet, 1958 (Trouessartiidae), Onychalges pachyspathus Gaud, 1968 (Pyroglyphidae), Paddacoptes paddae (Fain, 1964) (Dermationidae) and Neocheyletiella megaphallos (Lawrence, 1959) (Cheyletidae). Comparative material from Africa was also studied. Conclusions: These mites represent at least three morpho-ecological groups regarding their microhabitats occupied on the bird: (i) vane mites (Montesauria and Trouessartia on the large wing and tail feathers); (ii) down mites (Onychalges); and (iii) skin mites (Paddacoptes and Neocheyletiella). On one bird individual we found representatives of all eight mite species. Although the common waxbill was introduced to the Neotropical region almost two centuries ago, we demonstrate that it still retains its Old World acarofauna and has not yet acquired any representatives of typical Neotropical mite taxa. Keywords: Acari, Feather mites, Systematics, Biogeography, Neotropics, Biodiversity Background recorded from this host [4]. In this paper, we report The common waxbill, Estrilda astrild (L., 1758) (Passeri- eight mite species (Acariformes) from E.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting the Potential Distribution of the Invasive Common Waxbill (Passeriformes: Estrildidae) Darius Stiels, Kathrin Schidelko, Jan O
    Predicting the potential distribution of the invasive Common Waxbill (Passeriformes: Estrildidae) Darius Stiels, Kathrin Schidelko, Jan O. Engler, Renate Elzen, Dennis Rödder To cite this version: Darius Stiels, Kathrin Schidelko, Jan O. Engler, Renate Elzen, Dennis Rödder. Predicting the poten- tial distribution of the invasive Common Waxbill (Passeriformes: Estrildidae). Journal für Ornitholo- gie = Journal of Ornithology, Springer Verlag, 2011, 152 (3), pp.769-780. 10.1007/s10336-011-0662-9. hal-00669207 HAL Id: hal-00669207 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00669207 Submitted on 12 Feb 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Predicting the potential distribution of the invasive Common Waxbill Estrilda astrild (Passeriformes: Estrildidae) Darius Stiels1,*, Kathrin Schidelko1, Jan O. Engler2, Renate van den Elzen1, Dennis Rödder2 1 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany 2 Biogeography Department, Trier University, D-54286 Trier, Germany * Author for correspondence, e-mail: [email protected], Tel.: +49-228-9122 230 Abstract Human transport and commerce have led to an increased spread of non-indigenous species. Alien invasive species can have major impacts on many aspects of ecological systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Birding and Nature Tour September 13-25, 2014 Tour Species List
    P.O. Box 16545 Portal, AZ. 85632 PH: (866) 900-1146 www.caligo.com [email protected] [email protected] www.naturalistjourneys.com Naturalist Journeys: Namibia Birding and Nature Tour September 13-25, 2014 Tour Species List Dalton Gibbs of Birding Africa and Peg Abbott of Naturalist Journeys, with five participants: Andrea, Alex, Ty, Mimi, and Penny BIRDS Common Ostrich – Seen regularly in the first days of the trip in open terrain, strutting through just amazing landscapes with colorful escarpments amid seas of arid grassland. Numerous at Etosha, we could view their dominance behaviors and also some courting display, some of the males were starting to get very red necks and legs as they came into prime condition. Helmeted Guineafowl – Widespread and regularly seen throughout the journeys. The most tame were at Weltevrede where they posed on the gate, strutted about the farm and serenaded us at the end of each day. They came into the waterholes of Etosha in large groups, 20-50 at a time, vocal and jumpy, always alert. One by the roadside on the last day made this an everyday species for the trip. Red-billed Spurfowl – first seen in a wash as we approached Remhoogte Pass, coming off the escarpment onto the coastal plain on the first day from Windhoek. Widespread – seen on seven days of the trip, in all but our most arid locations. Saw some on the Dik Dik Drive of Etosha. And at the Waterberg they were abundant, at dawn their calls were deafening! Swainson’s Spurfowl – recognized by different calling, Peg spotted a family group as we entered the fort area of Namutoni in Etosha, active at the road margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia & Botswana 2014
    Namibia & Botswana 2014 A Tropical Birding Custom Trip Namibia & Botswana Tropical Birding Custom Trip August 7-23, 2014 Guides: Ken Behrens & Charley Hesse Photos by Ken Behrens. Most photos taken during the trip. Annotated checklist by Jerry Connolly www.tropicalbirding.com WINDHOEK After arrival in Namibia’s capital, we had a day to relax and enjoy the excellent birding on offer around this small and charming city. Windhoek has a population of about 300,000, out of Namibia’s tiny population of only 2.1 million, remarkable for a country that is twice the size of California. Crimson-breasted Gonolek (left), the national bird of Namibia, showed well at Avis Dam. On our morning walk at Avis Dam, we enjoyed Marico Sunbird (bottom left) and Southern Cordonbleu (top right), while there were a bounty of waterbirds at the Gammons Water Care (Sewage!) Works, including African Darter (bottom right) and Red-knobbed Coot (top left). Our day in Windhoek was relaxing but still productive. From Windhoek, in the central mountains, we descended into the Namib Desert, where species like these Common Ostrich survive despite incredibly harsh conditions. South African Ground Squirrel (top); Namib Dune Ant (bottom right); and Rueppell’s Bustard (bottom left), creatures of the Namib. WALVIS BAY AND SWAKOPMUND The Namib dune fields hold Namibia’s sole political endemic, the Dune Lark. Walvis Bay itself is a mecca for waterbirds, including thousands of flamingos. SPITZKOPPE From the Namib coast, we headed inland to Spitzkoppe, one of Namibia’s most striking landmarks. Our avian target at Spitzkoppe was the scarce Herero Chat.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Distribution of Non–Native Amazon Parrots and Temporal Trends of Their Global Trade
    Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 40.1 (2017) 49 Worldwide distribution of non–native Amazon parrots and temporal trends of their global trade E. Mori, G. Grandi, M. Menchetti, J. L. Tella, H. A. Jackson, L. Reino, A. van Kleunen, R. Figueira & L. Ancillotto Mori, E., Grandi, G., Menchetti, M., Tella, J. L., Jackson, H. A., Reino, L., van Kleunen, A., Figueira, R. & Ancillotto, L., 2017. Worldwide distribution of non–native Amazon parrots and temporal trends of their global trade. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 40.1: 49–62, https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2017.40.0049 Abstract Worldwide distribution of non–native Amazon parrots and temporal trends of their global trade.— Alien species are the second leading cause of the global biodiversity crisis, after habitat loss and fragmentation. Popular pet species, such as parrots and parakeets (Aves, Psittaciformes), are often introduced outside their native range as a result of the pet trade. On escape from captivity, some such species, such as the ring–necked parakeet and the monk parakeet, are highly invasive and successfully compete with native species. Popula- tions of Amazon parrots (Amazona spp.) can be found throughout the world, but data on their status, distribu- tion and impact are incomplete. We gathered and reviewed the available information concerning global trade, distribution, abundance and ecology of Amazon parrots outside their native range. Our review shows that at least nine species of Amazon parrots have established populations outside their original range of occurrence throughout the world (in Europe, South Africa, the Caribbean islands, Hawaii, and North and South America). Their elusive behaviour and small population size suggest that the number of alien nuclei could be underes- timated or at undetected.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Two Threatened Species in Two Ibas in Rwanda
    STATUS OF TWO THREATENED SPECIES IN TWO IBAS IN RWANDA September 2004-April 20051 Nsengiyunva Barakabuye, Charles Kahindo*, Eric Sande, Moses Chemurot, Claudien Nsabagasani & Eugene Kayijamahe *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Preliminary Project Report 1 Front Cover: Nsengiyunva and Kayijamahe holding trapped Grauer’s Rush Warblers. Inset: the Papyrus Yellow Warbler. Background: Central region of Rugezi marsh and surrounding. Acknowledgements The team would like to thank BP Conservation Programme for granting a silver award to this project in 2004. The team is deeply indebted to the BP Conservation Team especially Marianne Dunn, Robyn Dalzen and Kate Stokes for their sustained support throughout. The instructors and facilitators at the training workshop held in Whales and London (RGS) provided professional tools invaluable for the smooth running and management of the project. The team greatly appreciated varied support from local, national and regional organizations namely ACNR, BirdLife affiliate in Rwanda, Karisoke Research Centre, the Wildlife Conservation Society Project and the International Gorilla conservation Project. The government of Rwanda is thanked for granting support and work permits through the ORTPN, Ministry of Environment and district officers. ii Project Summary The study assessed the status of Grauer’s Rush Warbler (Bradypterus graueri) and Papyrus Yellow Warbler (Chloropeta gracilirostris) in Rugezi swamp and Volcanoes National Park in Rwanda. The study revealed that though habitat degradation is advanced in Rugezi the site still harbors a viable population of over 1,000 individuals of the endangered Grauer’s Rush Warbler with a large concentration in the central sector of the marsh. Papyrus dwellers including the Vulnerable Papyrus Yellow Warbler (Chloropeta gracilirostris) are the most affected by drainage.
    [Show full text]