DOCSLIB.ORG

Springer Theory: Lecture Notes from a Reading Course George H. Seelinger

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Springer Theory: Lecture Notes from a Reading Course George H. Seelinger Springer Theory: Lecture notes from a reading course George H. Seelinger 1. Introduction (presented by Weiqiang Wang) Yarrrrr pirates! (8/28/2017) Lecture 1: Semisimple Lie Algebras and Flag Va- rieties (presented by Mike Reeks). 2. Semisimple Lie Algebras and Flag Varieties In this section, we will review essential facts for our study going forward. Fix G to be a complex semisimple Lie group with Lie algebra g. 2.1. Proposition. g is a G-module via the adjoint action. That is, for g 2 G, x 2 g g:x = Add(φg)I (x) −1 where φg : G ! G maps h 7! ghg for h 2 G. Proof. Add in a proof here 2.2. Definition. A maximal solvable subgroup of G is called a Borel subgroup. 2.3. Definition. A torus of a compact Lie group G is a compact, con- nected, abelian Lie subgroup of G. 2.4. Proposition. Given a Borel subgroup B ≤ G of a Lie group, B has a maximal torus T ≤ G and a unipotent radical U ≤ G such that T · U = B. Proof. Add in a proof here 2.5. Example. Let G = SLn(C). Then, 0 1 0 1 0 1 ∗ ∗ ∗ 0 1 ∗ B C B C B C B = B C ;T = B C ;U = B C @ A @ A @ A 0 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 1 In particular, B = TU. 2.6. Definition. When considering the tangent spaces at the identity, we get a Borel subalgebra b = h ⊕ n where h is a Cartan subalgebra and n is a nilradical. 2.7. Remark. Note that n = [b; b] and b=[b; b] =∼ h. 2.8. Definition. We define the rank of a Lie algebra g to be rank g := dim h 2.9. Lemma. (a) Let B ≤ G be Borel. Then, B = NG(B) (that is, B is self-normalizing). (b) All Borel subgroups are G-conjugate Proof. Add a proof here 3 2.10. Definition. For x 2 g, we define Zg(x) = fy 2 g j [x; y] = 0g;ZG(x) = fg 2 G j g:x = xg 2.11. Example. Let g ⊆ gl2(C) be all 2 by 2 upper-triangular matrices. Then, 2.12. Proposition. dim(Zg(x)) ≥ rank g Proof. Let x be semisimple. Then, x is contained in some Cartan subalgebra h. However, h ⊆ Zg(x). Thus, the proposition is true for x semisimple. However, semisimple elements are Zariski dense, so the result applies for the closure. Check this last thing. 2.13. Definition. We say x 2 g is regular if dim Zg(x) = rank g. 2.14. Definition. We say x 2 g is semisimple (resp. nilpotent) if ad(x) is semisimple (resp nilpotent). 2.15. Remark. This result is actually somewhat non-trivial, but is cov- ered by Engel's theorem and related results. Now, recall that any x 2 g has a Jordan decomposition x = s + n where s 2 g is semisimple and n 2 g is nilpotent and s; n commute. 2.16. Definition. Let gsr be the set of semisimple regular elements in g. 2.17. Example. Note that not all regular elements are semisimple. Take 0 1 0 1 B C B C B C B C x = B 1 C B C B C @ A 0 Such an element is regular in sln because Zg(x) is spanned by the basis 2 n−1 n−1 fx; x ; : : : ; x g, which is the same size as the basis feii − ei+1;i+1gi=1 that spans the standard Cartan subalgebrah in sln. However, since it is nilpotent, it cannot be semisimple. 2.18. Proposition. Fix h ⊆ b ⊆ g. Then, (a) Any element of h is semisimple and any semisimple element is G- conjugate to an element of h. sr (b) If x 2 g , then Zg(x) is a Cartan subalgebra. (c) gsr is a G-stable dense subset of g (in the Zariski topology?) \Proof". Any element pf h is semisimple by definition. Also, in Humphreys chapter 16, he gives an argument that all Cartan subalgebras are G-conjugate 4 using the conjugacy of Borel subalgebras. For the second claim, clearly Zg(x) is a subalgebra. Varadarajan gives an argument for why it is a Cartan subalgebra. reproduce this here. 2.19. Example. A typical example of part (b) in sln is given by 0 1 λ 0 B 1 C B C x = B C @ A 0 λn with λi distinct. Then, Zg(x) is given by matrices (aij) such that X X 0 = [(aij); x] = [aijeij; x] = (aijλjeij − λiaijeij) i;j ij So, if i 6= j, then aij = 0 since λi 6= λj. That is to say, Zg(x) is all diagonal matrices in sln 2.20. Lemma. There exists a G-invariant polynomial P with coefficients in g such that x 2 gsr () P (x) 6= 0 Proof. Take x 2 g. Since dim ker(adx) ≥ rank g, the characteristic polynomial of adx is given by r r+1 det(tI − adx) = t Pr(x) + t Pr+1(x) + ··· where Pi are G-invariant polynomials on g and r = rank g. So, we have that x is regular if and only if t = 0 is a zero of order r of the characteristic polynomial. However, this is possible if and only if Pr(x) 6= 0. Thus, for x is semisimple and regular, we have found a desired polynomial. Since this polynomial is G-invariant and all semisimple elements are conjugate to an element in h, Figure out why this polynomial Flag Variety. applies to all regular semisim- 2.21. Definition. Define B to be the set of all Borel subalgebras of g. ple elements. 2.22. Proposition. B is a projective variety. 2.23. Definition. Let Gr be the Grassmanian of dim b-dimensional sub- spaces of g. 2.24. Proposition. B ⊆ Gr as a closed subvariety of solvable subalge- bras. 2.25. Proposition. The stabilizer of b under the G-adjoint action is B, the Borel subgroup of G. 5 2.26. Proposition. For g 2 G, the map g 7! g·b·g−1 induces a bijection G=B !B Moreover, this is a G-equivariant isomorphism of varieties. n 2.27. Example. In type A, B = fF = (0 ⊆ F1 ⊆ F2 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Fn = C )g where dim Fi = i, the variety of complete flags. 2.28. Proposition. Fix B ≤ G with Lie algebra b0. Then, we have the following bijections. 3 1 2 NG(T )=T = WT BnG=B fB-orbits on Bg fG-diagonal orbits on B × Bg where 1 is given by B · g · B 7! B(g · B=B), 2 is given by B:b 7! G:(b0; b), and 3 is given by W 7! B · w · B where w is a representative of W in N (T ). G Get some handle on the proofs of 2.29. Corollary. As a result, B = F B , where B is a Bruhat w2W w w these proposi- cell. tions! So W is a fixed point set of the ∗ action on B. w 2 W is w · B=B, C Understand this w 2 W . So, B = B · (wB=B) gives us T W better. Why G G G=B = B = BW = BwB=B does this follow w2W and why do we care? 2.30. Corollary. Each B-orbit in B contains exactly one point of the form wB=B, w 2 WT . Make sense of this statement. 2.31. Proposition (Plucker embedding). Skipped for now. 2.0.1. Extended sln example. Let G = SLn and g = sln. Then, we have the following result. 2.32. Lemma. B is naturally identified with the variety of complete flags. Proof. Let F be a complete flag. Then, bF = fx 2 sln j x(Fi) ⊆ Fi; 8ig 1 2 For example, if F is the coordinate flag, that is F = 0 ⊆ C ⊆ C ⊆ · · · ⊆ n C , then 0 1 ∗ b b B C F = = @ A Note that any 2 flags are conjugate by the SLn action, so bF is Borel for every flag F . Thus, our map is surjective. Hence, it is bijective and an isomorphism of algebraic varieties why does this last statement follow? 6 n 2.33. Lemma. Consider C =Sn. It is isomorphic as a variety to C[λ]n−1, polynomials in λ of degree less than or equal to n − 1. n Proof. Consider the map : C ! C[λ]n−1 given by n Y (x1; : : : ; xn) 7! λ − (λ − xi) The result of this map does not depend on the order of the xi's, so we can n mod out by the action of S on this map. n n Now, given a linear map x: C ! C , we have an unordered n-tuple of P eigenvalues fxig, but if x 2 sln, we know that xi = 0 since tr x = 0. So, take n−1 ∼ X C = f(x1; : : : ; xn) j xi = 0g n n as the n − 1-dimensional hyperplane in C . It is still stable under the S - n−1 action, giving us a map φ: sln ! C =Sn given by x 7! (x1; : : : ; xn); the eigenvalues of x 2.34. Definition. Given the information above, for g = sln, we define the incidence variety of g, denoted g~, to be g~ := f(x; F ) 2 sln × B j x(Fi) ⊆ Fig 2.35. Proposition. The following diagram commutes g~ µ ν n−1 n g C ⊆ C φ n−1 C =Sn n−1 where ν : g~ ! C sends (x; F ) to the ordered list of its eigenvalues λi where λi is the eigenvalue of the induced map Fi=Fi−1 ! Fi=Fi−1 and µ: g~ ! g is the standard projection onto the first coordinate (x; F ) 7! x.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Affine Springer Fibers and Affine Deligne-Lusztig Varieties
    Affine Springer Fibers and Affine Deligne-Lusztig Varieties Ulrich G¨ortz Abstract. We give a survey on the notion of affine Grassmannian, on affine Springer fibers and the purity conjecture of Goresky, Kottwitz, and MacPher- son, and on affine Deligne-Lusztig varieties and results about their dimensions in the hyperspecial and Iwahori cases. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). 22E67; 20G25; 14G35. Keywords. Affine Grassmannian; affine Springer fibers; affine Deligne-Lusztig varieties. 1. Introduction These notes are based on the lectures I gave at the Workshop on Affine Flag Man- ifolds and Principal Bundles which took place in Berlin in September 2008. There are three chapters, corresponding to the main topics of the course. The first one is the construction of the affine Grassmannian and the affine flag variety, which are the ambient spaces of the varieties considered afterwards. In the following chapter we look at affine Springer fibers. They were first investigated in 1988 by Kazhdan and Lusztig [41], and played a prominent role in the recent work about the “fun- damental lemma”, culminating in the proof of the latter by Ngˆo. See Section 3.8. Finally, we study affine Deligne-Lusztig varieties, a “σ-linear variant” of affine Springer fibers over fields of positive characteristic, σ denoting the Frobenius au- tomorphism. The term “affine Deligne-Lusztig variety” was coined by Rapoport who first considered the variety structure on these sets. The sets themselves appear implicitly already much earlier in the study of twisted orbital integrals. We remark that the term “affine” in both cases is not related to the varieties in question being affine, but rather refers to the fact that these are notions defined in the context of an affine root system.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents 1 Root Systems
    Stefan Dawydiak February 19, 2021 Marginalia about roots These notes are an attempt to maintain a overview collection of facts about and relationships between some situations in which root systems and root data appear. They also serve to track some common identifications and choices. The references include some helpful lecture notes with more examples. The author of these notes learned this material from courses taught by Zinovy Reichstein, Joel Kam- nitzer, James Arthur, and Florian Herzig, as well as many student talks, and lecture notes by Ivan Loseu. These notes are simply collected marginalia for those references. Any errors introduced, especially of viewpoint, are the author's own. The author of these notes would be grateful for their communication to [email protected]. Contents 1 Root systems 1 1.1 Root space decomposition . .2 1.2 Roots, coroots, and reflections . .3 1.2.1 Abstract root systems . .7 1.2.2 Coroots, fundamental weights and Cartan matrices . .7 1.2.3 Roots vs weights . .9 1.2.4 Roots at the group level . .9 1.3 The Weyl group . 10 1.3.1 Weyl Chambers . 11 1.3.2 The Weyl group as a subquotient for compact Lie groups . 13 1.3.3 The Weyl group as a subquotient for noncompact Lie groups . 13 2 Root data 16 2.1 Root data . 16 2.2 The Langlands dual group . 17 2.3 The flag variety . 18 2.3.1 Bruhat decomposition revisited . 18 2.3.2 Schubert cells . 19 3 Adelic groups 20 3.1 Weyl sets . 20 References 21 1 Root systems The following examples are taken mostly from [8] where they are stated without most of the calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Affine Grassmannians
    Introduction to Affine Grassmannians Sara Billey University of Washington http://www.math.washington.edu/∼billey Connections for Women: Algebraic Geometry and Related Fields January 23, 2009 0-0 Philosophy “Combinatorics is the equivalent of nanotechnology in mathematics.” 0-1 Outline 1. Background and history of Grassmannians 2. Schur functions 3. Background and history of Affine Grassmannians 4. Strong Schur functions and k-Schur functions 5. The Big Picture New results based on joint work with • Steve Mitchell (University of Washington) arXiv:0712.2871, 0803.3647 • Sami Assaf (MIT), preprint coming soon! 0-2 Enumerative Geometry Approximately 150 years ago. Grassmann, Schubert, Pieri, Giambelli, Severi, and others began the study of enumerative geometry. Early questions: • What is the dimension of the intersection between two general lines in R2? • How many lines intersect two given lines and a given point in R3? • How many lines intersect four given lines in R3 ? Modern questions: • How many points are in the intersection of 2,3,4,. Schubert varieties in general position? 0-3 Schubert Varieties A Schubert variety is a member of a family of projective varieties which is defined as the closure of some orbit under a group action in a homogeneous space G/H. Typical properties: • They are all Cohen-Macaulay, some are “mildly” singular. • They have a nice torus action with isolated fixed points. • This family of varieties and their fixed points are indexed by combinatorial objects; e.g. partitions, permutations, or Weyl group elements. 0-4 Schubert Varieties “Honey, Where are my Schubert varieties?” Typical contexts: • The Grassmannian Manifold, G(n, d) = GLn/P .
    [Show full text]
  • Special Unitary Group - Wikipedia
    Special unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group Special unitary group In mathematics, the special unitary group of degree n, denoted SU( n), is the Lie group of n×n unitary matrices with determinant 1. (More general unitary matrices may have complex determinants with absolute value 1, rather than real 1 in the special case.) The group operation is matrix multiplication. The special unitary group is a subgroup of the unitary group U( n), consisting of all n×n unitary matrices. As a compact classical group, U( n) is the group that preserves the standard inner product on Cn.[nb 1] It is itself a subgroup of the general linear group, SU( n) ⊂ U( n) ⊂ GL( n, C). The SU( n) groups find wide application in the Standard Model of particle physics, especially SU(2) in the electroweak interaction and SU(3) in quantum chromodynamics.[1] The simplest case, SU(1) , is the trivial group, having only a single element. The group SU(2) is isomorphic to the group of quaternions of norm 1, and is thus diffeomorphic to the 3-sphere. Since unit quaternions can be used to represent rotations in 3-dimensional space (up to sign), there is a surjective homomorphism from SU(2) to the rotation group SO(3) whose kernel is {+ I, − I}. [nb 2] SU(2) is also identical to one of the symmetry groups of spinors, Spin(3), that enables a spinor presentation of rotations. Contents Properties Lie algebra Fundamental representation Adjoint representation The group SU(2) Diffeomorphism with S 3 Isomorphism with unit quaternions Lie Algebra The group SU(3) Topology Representation theory Lie algebra Lie algebra structure Generalized special unitary group Example Important subgroups See also 1 of 10 2/22/2018, 8:54 PM Special unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group Remarks Notes References Properties The special unitary group SU( n) is a real Lie group (though not a complex Lie group).
    [Show full text]
  • Conjugacy Classes in the Weyl Group Compositio Mathematica, Tome 25, No 1 (1972), P
    COMPOSITIO MATHEMATICA R. W. CARTER Conjugacy classes in the weyl group Compositio Mathematica, tome 25, no 1 (1972), p. 1-59 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1972__25_1_1_0> © Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1972, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http: //http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ COMPOSITIO MATHEMATICA, Vol. 25, Fasc. 1, 1972, pag. 1-59 Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing Printed in the Netherlands CONJUGACY CLASSES IN THE WEYL GROUP by R. W. Carter 1. Introduction The object of this paper is to describe the decomposition of the Weyl group of a simple Lie algebra into its classes of conjugate elements. By the Cartan-Killing classification of simple Lie algebras over the complex field [7] the Weyl groups to be considered are: Now the conjugacy classes of all these groups have been determined individually, in fact it is also known how to find the irreducible complex characters of all these groups. W(AI) is isomorphic to the symmetric group 8z+ l’ Its conjugacy classes are parametrised by partitions of 1+ 1 and its irreducible representations are obtained by the classical theory of Frobenius [6], Schur [9] and Young [14]. W(B,) and W (Cl) are both isomorphic to the ’hyperoctahedral group’ of order 2’.l! Its conjugacy classes can be parametrised by pairs of partitions (À, Il) with JÂJ + Lui = 1, and its irreducible representations have been described by Specht [10] and Young [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations
    Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine Windsor, October 23, 2008 ν1 = ν2 β S S ν α β Sβν Sαν ν SO(3,2) 0 α SαSβSαSβν = SβSαSβν SβSαSβSαν S S SαSβSαν β αν 0 1 2 ν = 0 [type B2] 2 1 0: Introduction Spherical unitary dual of real split semisimple Lie groups spherical equivalence classes of unitary-dual = irreducible unitary = ? of G spherical repr.s of G aim of the talk Show how to compute this set using the Weyl group 2 0: Introduction Plan of the talk ² Preliminary notions: root system of a split real Lie group ² De¯ne the unitary dual ² Examples (¯nite and compact groups) ² Spherical unitary dual of non-compact groups ² Petite K-types ² Real and p-adic groups: a comparison of unitary duals ² The example of Sp(4) ² Conclusions 3 1: Preliminary Notions Lie groups Lie Groups A Lie group G is a group with a smooth manifold structure, such that the product and the inversion are smooth maps Examples: ² the symmetryc group Sn=fbijections on f1; 2; : : : ; ngg à finite ² the unit circle S1 = fz 2 C: kzk = 1g à compact ² SL(2; R)=fA 2 M(2; R): det A = 1g à non-compact 4 1: Preliminary Notions Root systems Root Systems Let V ' Rn and let h; i be an inner product on V . If v 2 V -f0g, let hv;wi σv : w 7! w ¡ 2 hv;vi v be the reflection through the plane perpendicular to v. A root system for V is a ¯nite subset R of V such that ² R spans V , and 0 2= R ² if ® 2 R, then §® are the only multiples of ® in R h®;¯i ² if ®; ¯ 2 R, then 2 h®;®i 2 Z ² if ®; ¯ 2 R, then σ®(¯) 2 R A1xA1 A2 B2 C2 G2 5 1: Preliminary Notions Root systems Simple roots Let V be an n-dim.l vector space and let R be a root system for V .
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Algebraic Groups
    Clay Mathematics Proceedings Volume 4, 2005 Linear Algebraic Groups Fiona Murnaghan Abstract. We give a summary, without proofs, of basic properties of linear algebraic groups, with particular emphasis on reductive algebraic groups. 1. Algebraic groups Let K be an algebraically closed field. An algebraic K-group G is an algebraic variety over K, and a group, such that the maps µ : G × G → G, µ(x, y) = xy, and ι : G → G, ι(x)= x−1, are morphisms of algebraic varieties. For convenience, in these notes, we will fix K and refer to an algebraic K-group as an algebraic group. If the variety G is affine, that is, G is an algebraic set (a Zariski-closed set) in Kn for some natural number n, we say that G is a linear algebraic group. If G and G′ are algebraic groups, a map ϕ : G → G′ is a homomorphism of algebraic groups if ϕ is a morphism of varieties and a group homomorphism. Similarly, ϕ is an isomorphism of algebraic groups if ϕ is an isomorphism of varieties and a group isomorphism. A closed subgroup of an algebraic group is an algebraic group. If H is a closed subgroup of a linear algebraic group G, then G/H can be made into a quasi- projective variety (a variety which is a locally closed subset of some projective space). If H is normal in G, then G/H (with the usual group structure) is a linear algebraic group. Let ϕ : G → G′ be a homomorphism of algebraic groups. Then the kernel of ϕ is a closed subgroup of G and the image of ϕ is a closed subgroup of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplicative Excellent Families of Elliptic Surfaces of Type E 7 Or
    MULTIPLICATIVE EXCELLENT FAMILIES OF ELLIPTIC SURFACES OF TYPE E7 OR E8 ABHINAV KUMAR AND TETSUJI SHIODA Abstract. We describe explicit multiplicative excellent families of rational elliptic surfaces with Galois group isomorphic to the Weyl group of the root lattices E7 or E8. The Weierstrass coefficients of each family are related by an invertible polynomial transformation to the generators of the multiplicative invariant ring of the associated Weyl group, given by the fundamental characters of the corresponding Lie group. As an application, we give examples of elliptic surfaces with multiplicative reduction and all sections defined over Q for most of the entries of fiber configurations and Mordell-Weil lattices in [OS], as well as examples of explicit polynomials with Galois group W (E7) or W (E8). 1. Introduction Given an elliptic curve E over a field K, the determination of its Mordell-Weil group is a fundamental problem in algebraic geometry and number theory. When K = k(t) is a rational function field in one variable, this question becomes a geometrical question of understanding sections of an elliptic surface with section. Lattice theoretic methods to attack this problem were described in [Sh1]. In particular, 1 when E! Pt is a rational elliptic surface given as a minimal proper model of 2 3 2 y + a1(t)xy + a3(t)y = x + a2(t)x + a4(t)x + a6(t) with ai(t) 2 k[t] of degree at most i, the possible configurations (types) of bad fibers and Mordell-Weil groups were analyzed by Oguiso and Shioda [OS]. In [Sh2], the second author studied sections for some families of elliptic surfaces with an additive fiber, by means of the specialization map, and obtained a relation between the coefficients of the Weierstrass equation and the fundamental invariants of the corresponding Weyl groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Weyl Character Formula for U(N)
    THE WEYL CHARACTER FORMULA–I PRAMATHANATH SASTRY 1. Introduction This is the first of two lectures on the representations of compact Lie groups. In this lecture we concentrate on the group U(n), and classify all its irreducible representations. The methods give the paradigm and set the template for study- ing representations of a large class of compact Lie groups—a class which includes semi-simple compact groups. The climax is the character formula of Weyl, which classifies all irreducible representations for this class, up to unitary equivalence. The typing was done in a hurry (last night and this morning, to be precise), and there may well be more serious errors than mere typos. Typos of course abound. 2. Fourier Analysis on abelian groups It is well-known, and easy to prove, that a compact ableian Lie group 1 is nec- essarily a torus Tn = S1 × . × S1 (n factors). A character on T = Tn is a Lie T C∗ 2 m1 mn group map χ : → . The maps χm1,... ,mn ((t1,...,tn) 7→ t1 ...tn ) lists n all characters on T as (m1,...,mn) varies over Z . This is a fairly elementary result—indeed, the image of a character χ must be a compact connected subgroup of C∗, forcing χ to take values in S1 ⊂ C∗. From there to seeing χ must equal a χm1,... ,mn is easy (try the case n = 1 !). T has an invariant Borel measure dt = dt1 ... dtn (the product of the “arc length” measures on the various S1 factors), the so called Haar measure on T 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Weyl Group Bn As Automorphisms of N-Cube: Isomorphism and Conjugacy
    Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal Volume 10 Issue 2 Article 3 Weyl group Bn as Automorphisms of n-cube: Isomorphism and Conjugacy David Chen University of California, Los Angeles, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rhumj Recommended Citation Chen, David (2009) "Weyl group Bn as Automorphisms of n-cube: Isomorphism and Conjugacy," Rose- Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal: Vol. 10 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rhumj/vol10/iss2/3 Weyl Group of Bn as Automorphisms of n-Cube: Isomorphism and Conjugacy David Chen University of California, Los Angeles Abstract The Weyl groups are important for Lie algebras. Lie algebras arise in the study of Lie groups, coming from symmetries of differential equa- tions, and of differentiable manifolds. The Weyl groups have been used to classify Lie algebras up to isomorphism. The Weyl group associated to a Lie algebra of type Bn and the group of graph automorphisms of the n n-cube Aut(Qn) are known to be isomorphic to Z2 o Sn. We provide a direct isomorphism between them via correspondence of generators. Geck and Pfeiffer have provided a parametrization of conjugacy classes and an algorithm to compute standard representatives. We believe we have a more transparent account of conjugacy in the Weyl group by looking at Aut(Qn). We give a complete description of conjugacy in the automor- phism group. We also give an algorithm to recover a canonical minimal length (in the Weyl group sense) representative from each conjugacy class, and an algorithm to recover that same representative from any other in the same conjugacy class.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximal Tori, Weyl Groups, and Roots
    Maximal tori, Weyl groups, and roots Ethan Lake 9/7/2015 1 Maximal tori Our goal in these notes is to try to understand the most important basic notions of the representation theory of Lie algebras. Of course, this is still very much a work in progress! Throughout, we let G denote a finite group. Definition 1.1. Let g be a finite-dimensional Lie algebra. A torus t is a com- mutative sub-algebra of g. A maximal torus is a torus which is not strictly contained in any other larger torus. Lemma 1.1. If t is a maximal torus of a Lie algebra g, then t is equal to its centralizer. Proof. Since t is commutative by definition, it is contained within its centralizer. Conversely, let Z be in the centralizer of t. Then t + KZ is also a torus, where K is the field we're working over. But t is maximal by assumption, and so Z 2 t. We can also define tori through the group U(1). The representation theory of U(1) is easy { each irreducible representation is labeled by some integer n. The natural way to construct a torus T is to take the product of m circles U(1)×· · ·×U(1), whose irreducible representations will be labeled by m integers. If we take some random G, we can attack the problem of finding the irreducible representations of G by taking the largest possible (the maximal) torus T such that T ⊂ G, and trying to understand the quotient G=T . Rather surprisingly, this turns out to be quite helpful in many cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximal Tori and the Weyl Integration Formula 1
    MAXIMAL TORI AND THE WEYL INTEGRATION FORMULA TAKUMI MURAYAMA 1. Introduction Consider G a compact, connected Lie group. A maximal torus is a subgroup of G that is also a torus Tk ' Rk=Zk, and is a maximal such subgroup with respect to inclusion. The Weyl group of G, defined as W = N(T )=T for a maximal torus T , depends definitionally on the choice of a maximal torus T , but by showing that any two tori are conjugate, we can see that W is unique up to isomorphism. This also shows that every conjugacy class in G meets T , and so to compute the integral of a class function, i.e., a function invariant under conjugation (such as the inner product of two characters), it should suffice to integrate only over the torus. The formula that allows this is the important Weyl Integration Formula (Theorem 4.1), which is fundamental in representation theory and in other areas like random matrix theory. What is in fact remarkable about the conjugacy theorem and the Weyl Integration formula is the variety of approaches one can take in proving them, although the conjugacy theorem was first found by Elie´ Cartan and the Weyl Integration formula by Hermann Weyl. Some are based on the Hopf-Rinow theorem from differential geometry [4], others are based on Andr´eWeil's proof using the Lefschetz fixed-point formula from algebraic topology [1], and still others are based on a (rather tedious, yet enlightening) move back and forth between G and its associated Lie algebra, where there is a similar theorem on the conjugacy of Cartan subalgebras, which has an elegant proof due to Hunt [7], [8].
    [Show full text]