DOCSLIB.ORG

The Right Health Care the Right Way Global Case Studies in Reducing Low-Value Care the Right Health Care the Right Way

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Right Health Care the Right Way Global Case Studies in Reducing Low-Value Care the Right Health Care the Right Way A report by the Center for Health Solutions The right health care the right way Global case studies in reducing low-value care The right health care the right way Value-based payment models have the potential to upend traditional patient care and business models. What can your organization do to effectively make the shift and “win” in the new value- based care payment landscape? To learn more about Deloitte’s value-based care practice and our relevant insights, please visit www.deloitte.com/us/ValueBasedCare. Global case studies in reducing low-value care CONTENTS Executive summary | 2 Introduction | 4 The right care | 5 The right setting | 8 Providing care safely | 10 Providing care in the right way | 12 Conclusions and overview of lessons for adoption and innovation | 14 Endnotes | 16 1 The right health care the right way Executive summary OW-VALUE health care—services of low, no, or In these 10 case studies, and throughout the pa- even negative impact on patients, as well as per, we highlight where effective use of technology Lservices delivered in an unsafe or inefficient has made a difference, from seemingly simple fixes manner—is pervasive across the globe. Some widely such as including patient photographs in electronic used services are clinically inappropriate for most health records to improving clinician training with patients under most circumstances. Examples in- Wi-Fi-enabled robots that simulate patients. We clude doing an EEG for an uncomplicated headache also show where emerging applications could make or a CT or MRI for lower back pain in patients with- even more of an impact in the future in terms of im- out signs of a neurological problem.1 More examples proving outcomes or reducing costs. In other cases, of low-value care are the misuse of some medica- we show how seemingly simple ideas or process re- tions, including opioids and antibiotics, which have designs, such as regular review of elderly patients’ led to growing problems in opioid abuse and antibi- otic-resistant bacteria. Reducing low-value care has proved to be a hard and slow task.2 Nevertheless, doing so is likely es- THE HIGH PRICE OF LOW-VALUE CARE sential if we are to lower costs while also pursuing The full costs of low-value health care innovation and improving health quality and out- services, waste, fraud, and inefficiency comes. In the United States alone, the financial across the globe are difficult to gauge, but toll of low-value care is estimated in hundreds of researchers have estimated those costs for billions of dollars (see sidebar “The high price of the United States, and they are significant: low-value care”). In addition, low-value care aris- • USD 210 billion ing from medical errors and operational inefficien- Overuse and excessive discretionary use cies in service delivery can result in adverse patient • USD 130 billion outcomes, excessive costs (including fraud), and Mistakes, preventable complications, and poor patient experience. Reducing and ultimately care fragmentation eliminating low-value services are likely essential to achieving value-based care, in which a treatment’s • USD 190 billion effectiveness ultimately helps to determine its value. Excess administrative costs, including The Deloitte Center for Health Solutions con- inefficiencies due to documentation ducted extensive research and interviewed experts requirements and paperwork costs beyond to see what is working globally to reduce low-value benchmarks care. The resulting case studies, spanning 10 orga- • USD 105 billion nizations in five different countries, illuminate four Unnecessarily expensive care avenues for reducing low-value care: • USD 55 billion • Providing the right care: Curbing services that Missed prevention opportunities offer few or no patient benefits • Delivering care in the right setting: Curtailing • USD 75 billion unwarranted emergency department utilization Fraud • Delivering care safely: Tackling safety failures Source: Institute of Medicine, Best care at lower • Providing care in the right way: Rooting out cost: The path to continuously learning health care in America, National Academy of the Sciences, 2013. operational inefficiencies 2 Global case studies in reducing low-value care drug regimens by pharmacists or incorporating lean show how health care organizations can reduce low- principles throughout a hospital, can significantly value care in favor of the right care, in the right set- reduce costs or improve outcomes when imple- ting, safely, and in the right way. mented effectively. Taken together, these examples 3 The right health care the right way Introduction HE high costs of low-value health care—exces- Avoidable injury from adverse events related sive spending, waste of patients’ and clinicians’ to medical procedures, stress associated with false Ttime, and poorer patient outcomes—make a positives from unnecessary screening tests and in- stirring case for change. vasive follow-up procedures, and time and produc- Global awareness of the prevalence of low-value tivity costs can greatly add to the toll taken by inap- care has been increasing. More than 20 countries propriate or inefficiently delivered services. Misuse have initiated “Choosing Wisely” campaigns, in of antibiotics, for instance, is a contributing factor which health care specialty societies identify desig- to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, associat- nated services, tests, or treatments that are inappro- ed with over 20,000 deaths annually in the United priately used in certain circumstances, and work to States alone.9 reduce their use.3 Awareness of the issue is important but likely In the United States, the cost of services that not enough to effect change. Reducing low-value don’t necessarily benefit patients approaches USD care has often proved hard and slow. There is no 210 billion annually.4 In addition, safety shortfalls single, simple solution to reducing low-value care and operational inefficiencies, such as duplicating that organizations can put into motion by pulling the delivery of certain services due to inappropri- a lever. But some health organizations around the ate care coordination, amount to USD 130 billion world have been successful in finding solutions to yearly.5 reduce the prevalence of low-value care. Our case Similarly high costs associated with low-value studies from the United States, Brazil, Israel, Sin- care service delivery have been documented in- gapore, and the United Kingdom demonstrate that ternationally.6 For instance, an ongoing review technology has often made a difference. From seem- of public health care in Australia has identified ingly simple fixes such as including patient photo- potential savings amounting to AUD 409 million graphs in electronic health records to improving from implementing benefit changes to reduce low- clinician training with Wi-Fi-enabled robots that value care.7 In the United Kingdom, eliminating simulate patients, technology can serve a crucial unwarranted variations in care could save up to role in enabling solutions to reducing low-value GBP 5 billion.8 care around the globe, and promises to help even more in the future. 4 Global case studies in reducing low-value care The right care Curbing the provision of services that offer few or no patient benefits LTHOUGH progress on changes at the broad As a result, LAC+USC saw an 80 percent drop system level has been slow, our case stud- in unnecessary preoperative work for cataract sur- Aies—from the United States, the United gery over a six-month trial period as compared to Kingdom, and Brazil—highlight successful initia- another large public teaching hospital that did not tives to reduce the delivery of services that provide implement the same change. Without additional few or no patient benefits. In the United States, testing, average waiting time for surgery declined process change, education, and physician training by six months. have reduced unnecessary preoperative testing in Detailed results of an evaluation of this initiative California; in the United Kingdom, process change, showed that: education, and training to cut down potentially un- • Unnecessary preoperative medical visits fell necessary diagnostic procedures reduced their use; from 76 percent to 12 percent of patients after and in Brazil, training clinicians prevented exces- the program was implemented. sive use of C-sections. • Ninety percent of pre-intervention patients had unnecessary preoperative laboratory testing com- pared to 31 percent following implementation. • Patients waited a median of 245 days until sur- ase study 1 gery pre-intervention, compared to a median of Eliminating unnecessary preoperative testing 64 days following implementation. • Given that preoperative testing is estimated at USD 1,200 per case, LAC+USC Medical Center Los Angeles County-University of Southern anticipates significant cost savings with no ad- California Medical Center10 saw a six-month re- verse impact on patient care. duction in patient wait time for surgery and USD 1,200 in savings per patient. ase study 2 The Los Angeles County-University of South- Involving patients in ern California Medical Center (LAC+USC), a pub- decision-making lic teaching hospital, made changes in 2015 to eliminate routine preoperative testing that not all patients need before routine cataract surgery. The The UK Health Foundation’s MAGIC program changes were based on Choosing Wisely guide- involved patients in treatment decisions, which led lines.11 With just three additional keystrokes in the to more streamlined services and positive ordering system, doctors could identify patients satisfaction scores for both patients and health who did not need the expensive, time-consuming care professionals.12 testing because they did not meet specific clinical In 2010, the UK Health Foundation commis- criteria. The three additional keystrokes circum- sioned the MAGIC (Making Good Decisions in Col- vented an unnecessary radiology consult, leading to laboration) program to identify, design, and test fewer potential delays to scheduling the procedure. the best ways to embed shared decision-making 5 The right health care the right way (involving both patients and doctors) in health care.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smoking Cessation: the Role of the Anesthesiologist
    Society for Ambulatory Anesthesiology Section Editor: Tong J. Gan E REVIEW ARTICLE CME Smoking Cessation: The Role of the Anesthesiologist Amir Yousefzadeh, MD, Frances Chung, MD, FRCPC, David T. Wong, MD, FRCPC, David O. Warner, MD, and Jean Wong, MD, FRCPC * * * † * Smoking increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Smoking cessation before surgery reduces the risk of complications. The perioperative period may be a “teachable moment” for smoking cessation and provides smokers an opportunity to engage in long-term smoking cessation. Anesthesiologists as the perioperative physicians are well-positioned to take the lead in this area and improve not only short-term surgical outcomes but also long-term health outcomes and costs. Preoperative interventions for tobacco use are effective to reduce postoperative complications and increase the likelihood of long-term abstinence. If intensive interventions (counseling, pharmacotherapy, and follow-up) are impractical, brief interventions should be implemented in preoperative clinics as a routine practice. The “Ask, Advise, Connect” is a practical strategy to be incorporated in the surgical setting. All anesthesiologists should ask their patients about smoking and strongly advise smokers to quit at every visit. Directly connecting patients to existing counseling resources, such as telephone quitlines, family phy- sicians, or pharmacists using fax or electronic referrals, greatly increases the reach and the impact of the intervention. (Anesth Analg 2016;122:1311–20) moking is a risk factor for several perioperative cessation using Medline (January 1946 to May 2015) and complications,1–5 which is a major concern because EMBASE (January 1974 to May 2015). The following text- smokers comprise a substantial proportion of surgi- word terms were used in our search strategies: smoking S 6,7 cal patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Preoperative Smoking Cessation and Postoperative Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Arrêt A` Court
    Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth (2012) 59:268–279 DOI 10.1007/s12630-011-9652-x REPORTS OF ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS Short-term preoperative smoking cessation and postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis Arreˆta` court terme du tabagisme en pre´ope´ratoire et complications postope´ratoires: revue syste´matique de la litte´rature et me´ta-analyse Jean Wong, MD • David Paul Lam, BSc • Amir Abrishami, MD • Matthew T. V. Chan, MBBS • Frances Chung, MBBS Received: 24 August 2011 / Accepted: 1 December 2011 / Published online: 21 December 2011 Ó Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society 2011 Abstract derive the minimum duration of preoperative abstinence Purpose The literature was reviewed to determine the from smoking required to reduce such complications in risks or benefits of short-term (less than four weeks) adult surgical patients. smoking cessation on postoperative complications and to Source We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and other relevant databases for cohort studies and ran- domized controlled trials that reported postoperative complications (i.e., respiratory, cardiovascular, wound- Author contributions Jean Wong was involved in data abstraction, healing) and mortality in patients who quit smoking within interpretation of data, drafting and revising, and final approval of the six months of surgery. Using a random effects model, article. David Paul Lam was involved in data abstraction and drafting meta-analyses were conducted to compare the relative of the article. Amir Abrishami was involved in drafting and revising the article, data analysis, and interpretation of the data. Matthew risks of complications in ex-smokers with varying intervals Chan revised and approved the final version of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Care Guideline Perioperative Protocol
    Health Care Guideline Perioperative Protocol How to Cite this Document Card R, Sawyer M, Degnan B, Harder K, Kemper J, Marshall M, Matteson M, Roemer R, Schuller-Bebus G, Swanson C, Stultz J, Sypura W, Terrell C, Varela N. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Perioperative Protocol. Updated March 2014. ICSI Members, Sponsors and organizations delivering care within Minnesota borders, may use ICSI documents in the following ways: • ICSI Health Care Guidelines and related products (hereinafter “Guidelines”) may be used and distributed by ICSI Member and Sponsor organizations as well as organizations delivering care within Minnesota borders. The guidelines can be used and distributed within the organization, to employees and anyone involved in the organization’s process for developing and implementing clinical guidelines. • ICSI Sponsor organizations can distribute the Guidelines to their enrollees and those care delivery organizations a sponsor holds insurance contracts with. • Guidelines may not be distributed outside of the organization, for any other purpose, without prior written consent from ICSI. • The Guidelines may be used only for the purpose of improving the health and health care of Member’s or Sponsor’s own enrollees and/or patients. • Only ICSI Members and Sponsors may adopt or adapt the Guidelines for use within their organizations. • Consent must be obtained from ICSI to prepare derivative works based on the Guidelines. • Appropriate attribution must be given to ICSI on any and all print or electronic documents that reference the Guidelines. All other copyright rights for ICSI Health Care Guidelines are reserved by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. The Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement assumes no liability for any use, adaptations, revisions or modifications made to ICSI Health Care Guidelines by the user or others.
    [Show full text]
  • Perioperative
    Health Care Guideline: Perioperative Index Table Sixth Edition January 2020 1. General Preoperative Management Preoperative Health Screening and Assessment Preoperative Testing Electrocardiogram Chest X-ray Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Testing Potassium/Sodium Testing Renal Function (Creatinine) Testing Pregnancy Testing Hemostasis (Coagulation) Testing Glucose Testing in Nondiabetic Patients Sleep Apnea Nicotine Cessation Preparation for Surgery 2. Perioperative Management of Select Conditions Cardiovascular Considerations Prevention of Endocarditis Anticoagulants/Antithrombotics Diabetes Mellitus 3. Perioperative Opioid Management Preoperative Opioid Management Preoperative Patient Education Preoperative Opioid Risk Assessment and Mitigation Preoperative Opioid Use Intraoperative Pain Management Postoperative Opioid Management Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Postoperative Patient Education Perioperative Considerations for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Patients on Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) Patients Not on Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) Return to Table of Contents www.icsi.org Copyright © 2020 by Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement 1 Perioperative Sixth Edition /January 2020 Table of Contents Perioperative Perioperative Annotations ..........................................................................................1–59 Guideline Work Opioid Index Table ................................................................................................1 Group Leader Management Evidence Grading .....................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • By Casta Townsley, BSN, RN RECOMMENDED: Dr. Thomas Hendrix, Phd, RN Chair ___
    Preoperative Smoking Cessation Intervention: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence With Practice Recommendations Item Type Report Authors Townsley, Casta Publisher University of Alaska Anchorage Download date 02/10/2021 17:44:14 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/6494 PREOPERATIVE SMOKING CESSATION INTERVENTION: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE WITH PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS By Casta Townsley, BSN, RN RECOMMENDED: _____________________________________ Dr. Thomas Hendrix, PhD, RN Chair __________________________________________ Dr. Lisa Jackson, DNP, FNP, NP-C Advisory Committee __________________________________________ Barbara Berner, EdD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAANP Director, School of Nursing APPROVED: __________________________________________ Susan Kaplan, PhD, MBA, OT Senior Associate Dean, College of Health _________________________________________ Date Running Head: PREOPERATIVE SMOKING CESSATION 1 Preoperative Smoking Cessation Intervention: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence with Practice Recommendations Casta Townsley, BSN, RN Masters of Science: University of Alaska Anchorage December 04, 2015 PREOPERATIVE SMOKING CESSATION 2 Abstract Smoking is the single most important risk factor in the development of postoperative complications. Daily smoking increases the risk of postoperative complications by a factor of two to four. Smoking cessation preoperatively is beneficial in increasing rates of cessation and therefore reducing the incidence of complications postoperatively. As a result, smoking cessation should be recognized as a core element of care for the preoperative management of the surgical patient. Although the benefits of smoking cessation are well established, as is substantial evidence demonstrating that brief interventions are effective in increasing cessation rates among users, clinicians fail to consistently address the issue of tobacco use or provide smoking cessation interventions. Referral to elective surgical procedures provides an excellent opportunity for primary providers to promote smoking cessation interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Preoperative Total Joint Replacement
    p re o p e r at i v e total joint replacement Patient Name surgery date Return to your orthopedic physician for your final pre-op check up n:o date time Your physician will tell you what time to arrive at the hospital for your surgery. Please call your physician’s office if you did not get this information. Please Bring This Book With You To: Every office visit Your hospital pre-op class The hospital on admission All physical therapy visits after surgery g u i d e b o o k table of contents Clinical Diary Using the Clinical Diary—Instructions for Professionals General Information Welcome Purpose of the GuideBook Overview—Center for Joint Replacement Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Preoperative Checklist (complete and check off items) What to Do Six Weeks Before Surgery Complete Role of Joint Care Coordinator _____ Contact Your Insurance Company _____ Pre-Register for Hospital _____ Obtain Medical and Anesthesia Clearance _____ Start Preoperative Exercises _____ Register/Attend Preoperative Class _____ Review “Exercise Your Right” (appendix) _____ Decide Whether to Donate Your Blood (appendix) _____ Exercising Before Surgery _____ What to Do Four Weeks Before Surgery Start Iron — Vitamins (as instructed by your surgeon) _____ Read “Anesthesia and You” (appendix) _____ What to Do Ten Days Before Surgery Preoperative Visit to Your Surgeon _____ Stop Medications That Increase Bleeding _____ Prepare Your Home _____ g u i d e b o o k table of contents What to Do the Day Before Surgery Find Out Your Arrival Time at the
    [Show full text]
  • Perioperative Management of Adrenalectomy and Inferior Vena Cava Reconstruction in a Patient with a Large, Malignant Pheochromocytoma with Vena Caval Extension
    Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 31 (2017) 365–377 HOSTED BY Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.jcvaonline.com Case Conference Perioperative Management of Adrenalectomy and Inferior Vena Cava Reconstruction in a Patient With a Large, Malignant Pheochromocytoma With Vena Caval Extension Stephen H. Gregory, MDn, Suraj M. Yalamuri, MDn, Sharon L. McCartney, MDn, Syed A. Shah, MD†, Julie A. Sosa, MD, MA†, Sanziana Roman, MD†, Brian J. Colin, MDn,1, Claude Lentschener, MD‡, Ray Munroe, MD§, Saumil Patel, MD§, Jared W. Feinman, MD§, John G.T. Augoustides, MD, FASE, FAHA§ *Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC †Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC ‡Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Cochin University Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France §Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA Key Words: anesthesia; pheochromocytoma; inferior vena cava; rhabdomyolysis; intraoperative care PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA IS AN uncommon tumor that complications and management in the intensive care unit can present a significant perioperative challenge, potentially (ICU) setting. resulting in hemodynamic instability necessitating the use of Pheochromocytoma is a rare neuroendocrine tumor that multiple vasoactive agents. On rare occasions, malignant arises from chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla or extra- pheochromocytomas are encountered; these can invade adja- adrenal paraganglia
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 1
    Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prevention During Outpatient Surgery Item Type DNP Project Authors Amoah-Kusi, Grace Publication Date 2017 Keywords Ambulatory Surgical Procedures--adverse effects; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting--prevention & control; Practice Guideline Download date 01/10/2021 09:44:52 Item License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10713/6449 Running head: REDUCING POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING 1 Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prevention During Outpatient Surgery Grace Amoah-Kusi University of Maryland Baltimore REDUCING POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING 2 Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prevention During Outpatient Surgery Post- operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has been a recognized complication of surgical procedures for many decades (Benevides, Oliveira, de Aguilar-Nascimento, 2013; Erhan, Erhan, Aydede, Yumus, Yentur, 2008). Research indicates the importance of identifying and treating high-risk patients to prevent or reduce PONV (Alghanem, Massad, Rashed, Abu-ali, Daradkeh, 2010). Physiological complications of PONV can be life-threatening and include airway obstruction, aspiration pneumonia, wound dehiscence, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, pain and delayed recovery (Abraham, 2008; Sinha, Singh, Williams, Ochroch, Goudra, 2014; Voigt et al., 2011). Due to the extensive complications, PONV is associated with longer hospitalization, readmissions, and increased anxiety and distress for patients (Birmingham, Mecklenburg, Lujan, Dacanay, R. G. et al., 2006; Erhan, et al., 2008). There is a consensus in research on the importance of preoperative screening for the identification of high-risk patients and administration of multimodal prophylactic pharmacological treatments for prevention and/ or reduction of PONV incidents (Abraham, 2008; Sinha, et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Early Versus Delayed Carotid Surgery After Acute Ischemic Stroke
    Open Access Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Disorders Research Article Analysis of early Versus Delayed ISSN Carotid Surgery after Acute Ischemic 2639-3220 Stroke PEROU Sébastien1*, DETANTE Olivier1, SPEAR Rafaelle3, PIRVU Augustin1, ELIE Amandine2, MAGNE Jean-Luc1 1Departments of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Grenoble University Hospital, France 2Neurology and Stroke Center, Grenoble University Hospital, France 3Vascular Surgery Lille University Hospital, France *Address for Correspondence: PEROU ABSTRACT Sébastien, Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Grenoble University Hospital, Boulevard de la Chantourne 38 700 La Tronche, France. Objective: We evaluated the 30-day outcomes of early (≤ 14 days) or delayed (15 days to three months) Tel: 0033476767575; E-mail: sperou@chu- carotid revascularization (CR) performed in patients who presented acute brain infarction secondary to internal grenoble.fr carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Submitted: 20 October 2016 Methods: We included all patients with a recent cerebral infarction from July 2010 to June 2014 who Approved: 02 January 2017 underwent CR in our center within three months after the onset of symptoms for ICA stenosis. Data were Published: 03 January 2017 retrospectively collected. Two groups were identifi ed: Group A included patients who underwent early CR within the fi rst fourteen days after symptom onset, and Group B, patients who underwent delayed CR, from Copyright: 2017 Sébastien et al. This is the fi fteenth day up to the third month after symptom onset. Death, stroke and major adverse cardiac events an open access article distributed under the (MACE) were analyzed. Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and Results: Seventy-one patients underwent CR (73.2% men, with a median age of 71).
    [Show full text]
  • What Should Pre Operative Clinics Do to Optimize Patients for Major
    What Should Pre operative Clinics Do to Optimize Patients for Major Surgery? Arjun P. Meka, BS1 and Uchenna Okoro, BS1; Todd A. Jaffe, BBA1; David Cron, BS1; Daniel Z. Semaan, BS1; Charles Hwang, BS1; Joseph Papin IV, BS1; William Palazzolo, PA- C1; Meredith Barrett, MD1 Introduction reoperative evaluation anesthesiologists, and surgeons. and care are essential for A further literature review was P optimal surgical outcomes conducted to provide both preop- and can provide health benefits erative and postoperative recom- long after surgical intervention.1 mendations for anesthesiologists Perioperative patient interactions and surgeons. We offer the follow- should be utilized to improve out- ing review and recommendations comes and empower change in in order to provide the best care patient’s lives. The aims of preop- practices during the periopera- erative evaluation are to reduce tive period to help mitigate com- the risks associated with sur- plications after patients undergo gery, increase quality, decrease surgery. unnecessary costs, and ultimately restore the patient to the desired Preoperative Care level of functioning.2 However, Management Domains Author Affiliations: guidelines for care differ among • Smoking Department of Surgery, University hospitals and clinical settings.3,4 • Physical activity of Michigan Medical School, Ann The objective of this review is • Nutrition Arbor, MI; 2Michigan Surgical Quality to provide an overview of clinical • Alcohol use Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI domains that can affect surgical • Cardiac disease outcomes. The following domains • Deep vein thrombosis / Corresponding Authors: Arjun Meka were selected as common health venous thromboembolism (ameka @med .umich.edu); issues affecting patients’ postop- • Chronic narcotic use Uchenna Okoro erative outcomes after interview- • Obstructive sleep apnea (uchokoro @med .umich.edu) ing nurses, physician assistants, • Diabetes 78 ARJUN P.
    [Show full text]
  • Preoperative Cardiac Risk Stratification 2007
    REVIEW Preoperative Cardiac Risk Stratification 2007: Evolving Evidence, Evolving Strategies 1 Steven L. Cohn, MD, FACP Various guidelines and risk indices have optimized cardiac risk stratification, and 2 Andrew D. Auerbach, MD, MPH the emphasis has shifted to reducing perioperative risk. This review is an update on invasive (CABG/PCI) and noninvasive (medical therapy with beta-blockers, alpha- 1 State University of New York— Downstate, Divi- agonists, and statins) strategies to reduce cardiac risk for noncardiac surgery and sion of General Internal Medicine, Brooklyn, New the controversies surrounding their use. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2007;2: York 174–180. © 2007 Society of Hospital Medicine. 2 University of California San Francisco, Depart- ment of Medicine, San Francisco, California KEYWORDS: preoperative care, perioperative, risk assessment, beta-adrenergic blockers, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass, statin. ore than 33 million patients undergo surgery annually in the MUnited States. Approximately 8 million of these patients ei- ther have known coronary artery disease or risk factors for it, and an estimated 50,000 patients sustain a perioperative myocardial infarction, with an additional 1 million developing another med- ical complication. An integrated comprehensive approach is nec- essary to risk-stratify these patients in an attempt to reduce these complications. The basic role of risk stratification is to identify those patients at increased risk for complications; however, we are looking for a small number of patients at high risk in a population of relatively low-risk patients. Most surgical patients do well, and further di- agnostic testing has a low yield in predicting those likely to have a complication (poor positive predictive value [PPV]).
    [Show full text]
  • Perioperative Care of the Patient Undergoing Colorectal Surgery
    Perioperative Care of the Patient Undergoing Colorectal Surgery David DeHaas Surgery Symposium April 28th, 2012 Nothing to Disclose Colorectal Surgery Case Presentation MS is a 30 yr old WM with an episode of diverticulitis 2 yrs ago who presents with severe lower abdominal pain that has persisted despite out patient treatment with oral flagyl and cipro therapy. PE : remarkable for T 38.6; P94; BP 124/70; Abdomen shows suprapubic and LLQ tenderness and guarding Case Presentation WBC 17,800 CT scan: Severe diverticulitis of sigmoid colon with suspected local perforation and large surrounding phlegmon without formal abscess. Case Presentation Patient treated in hospital with 3 days of IV zosyn and bowel rest. Discharged on 1 week of continued cipro and flagyl therapy. Because of mild persistent LLQ pain elective interval surgery planned. Case Presentation 6 weeks later patient undergoes “elective” laparoscopic assisted sigmoid colectomy using accelerated recovery clinical pathway. He has preop mechanical bowel prep using oral antibiotics. He mobilizes and begin a low residue diet on first postoperative day with limited postoperative fluids. Case Presentation Foley catheter is removed and IV is saline locked on first postop day. Patient uses only oral narcotics, acetaminophen, and toradol for pain management. He has bowel movement and is discharged on 2nd postop day with wound doing well. Case Presentation 2 JB is a 65 yr old WM with a biopsy documented asymptomatic rectal cancer at 8 cm from anal verge on routine colonoscopy. Preoperative staging shows no evidence of metastatic disease. Case Presentation 2 Patient receives a mechanical bowel prep with oral antibiotics.
    [Show full text]