DOCSLIB.ORG

Pieter De Hooch of De Hoogh. Door P. Iwveizkopv Van

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pieter De Hooch of De Hoogh. Door P. Iwveizkopv Van PIETER DE HOOCH OF DE HOOGH. DOOR P. IWVEIZKOPV VAN RIJSEWIJK. R. A. BREDIUS heeft in zijne studie over dezen nieester der Hollandsche schilderschool, in den zevenden jaar- gang van dit tijdschrift, uit diens eigenhandige stukken van 1667 tot i6y aangetoond, dat hij omstreeks 1630 moet geboren zijn, en in 1653 tot 1655 te Delft heeft gewoond, gelijk trouwens reeds bekend was, dat hij, den 20en September van laatstgenoemd jaar lid werd van het Delftsche St. Lucasgild, en wel "vremt sijnde". Hii- was dus niet te Delft ?eboren, ' en tot heden kent men zijne geboorteplaats niet. Dr. A. VAN DER WILLIGEN Pz. opperde in Les artistes de Harlem de vraag, of de door hem in de registers van Haarlem gevonden PIETER DE HOOGE de beroemde schilder kon zijn, maar BREDIUS antwoordde terecht, dat iedere aanwijzing ontbrak, dat deze man schilder was, en bewees door zijne handteeke- ning van 1669 te plaatsen naast die van den schilder uit de jaren 1668 en 1670, dat hij de schilder niet kon zijn. Een tweede candidaat was de PIETER D'HOGE of HOOGHE te Amsterdam, die genoemd wordt in de Biographische ?IantPekerain?-en van Mr. A. D. DE VRIES, 173 en in de, bij KRAMM vermelde processtukken van ROMEIJN DE HOOGHE. BREDIUS deed echter opmerken, dat deze man, met ROMEIJN D'HOOGE, door een derden broeder JOHANNES, zijdelintwerker, den I9en Juli 1648 tot voogd werd benoemd, en het niet waarschijnlijk was, dat de toen eerst I8jarige schilder reeds met dien post zou worden bekleed. Hij had er kunnen bijvoegen, dat deze PIETER DE HOOGHE op 16 Sept. 1642 getuige was bij den doop van des graveurs zuster SARA, en een twaalfjarige knaap stellig niet hiertoe zou zijn uitgenoodigd. Een derde candidaat deed zich op in het Schildersregister van Dr. JAN SIJSMUS. Drie keeren zelfs wordt PIETER DE HOOGH daar vermeld. In den achtsten jaargang van dit Tijdschrift, p. 222 leest men in gemeld register: "KAREL DE HOOGH, vader van PIETER"; p. 307: "PIETER DE HOOGH, landschap, Utert, "redelijk, sijn vader hiet CAREL", en p. 139 van den negenden jaargang nog eens: "P. DE HOOGH". De Heer BREDIUS, wiens aanteekeningen op dit register m. i. belangrijker zijn dan het stuk zelf, is blijkbaar genegen deze mededeeling van Dr. SIJSMUS aan te nemen, maar ik meen ook hier te moeten toepassen, wat hij in zijne inleiding tot het Register schreef: "niet altijd blijkt de medicus nauw- ,,keurig te zijn ingelicht; wij moeten dus niet steeds onvoorwaardelijk alles aan- ,,nemen wat hij vertelt". Ja, deze opvatting is, naar mijne zienswijze, nog veel te goedhartig. SIJSMUS is m. i. een onhandig compilator van hetgeen hij vond in eenige geschreven bronnen, waarbij 66n uit Rotterdam, en, gelijk BREDIUS reeds deed opmerken, ook DE BIE behoorde. Een slordig compilator tevens, zooals telkens blijkt en ook hier uit het herhaald ne6rschrijven van den naam van PIETER DE HOOGH. Een man bovendien, die voor de kunst zelve zich weinig interesseerde. Hoe anders te verklaren, dat hij van CUIJP, B. VAN DER HELST, TH. DE KEIJSER slechts de namen noemt; van METSU en TER I?ORCH slechts weet te zeggen, dat zij "juffertjes" schilderden; ADRIAAN VAN OSTADE slechts kent als graveur, en REMBRANDT geheel vergeet! Telkens geeft hij verkeerde voornamen en sterfda- tums ; somtijds maakt hij vader en zoon tot 66n persoon, zooals bij de POTTERS; verdicht hij schilders die nooit bestaan hebben, gelijk PIETER DE VLIEGER, ABRANI PALAMEDES; schrijft hij het werk van den een den ander toe, zooals bij JAN VAN DE VELDE, enz. Het laatste is, naar mijne overtuiging, ook het geval met hetgeen hij van PIETER DE HOOGH zegt. "Landschap, Utert, redelijk" - wie leest dit, zonder aan KAREL te denken ? Hoe kan men dit ongewrongen op PIETER toepassen? Was deze een "redelijk" schilder? Werkte hij te Utrecht? Moet men diens tuinen, waarin de figuren toch hoofdzaak zijn nevens het spel van licht en kleur, geen geweld aandoen, om ze "landschap" te noemen, en is "landschap" het genre, waarin men PIL'rER's werk plaatsen kan? Maar men zal zeggen: al heeft SIJSMUS het werk van KAREL DE HOOCH ten onrechte voor dat van PIETER 174 uitgegeven, hiermede is niet uitgesloten de mogelijkheid dat PIETER een zoon van KAREL is. Ten volle waar, maar men zal toegeven dat voor het aannemen dezer bloedverwantschap toch wel wat beter bewijs noodig zal zijn dan het zeggen van een man, zoo slordig en onkundig als deze compilator. En dat beter bewijs kan niet worden geleverd. CAREL CORNELISZ. DE HOOCH was te Haarlem toen AMPZING zijne Beschr?iving dezer stad te boek stelde, welke in 1628 ver- scheen. In hetzelfde jaar schonk hij eene schilderij aan het St. Jobs-gasthuis te Utrecht. Misschien was hij toen reeds naar die stad verhuisd, maar hij werd eerst in 1633 lid van het Utrechtsch schildersgild, en geheel zeker is dat dus niet. Den 2en Juli 1638 overleed hij reeds "naelatende sijn huijsfrou met echte onmundige kinderen". Mr. S. MULLER Fz. had de vriendelijkheid de doopboeken te Utrecht na te slaan, maar kon er geen kind van CAREL DE HOOCH of CAREL CORNELISZ. vinden. Een onderzoek in de registers te Haarlem door den heer C. J. GONNET met de meeste welwillendheid ingesteld, had geen ander resultaat. De eenige autoriteit, waarop men zich voor de verwantschap van CAREL en YIETER beroepen kan, is en blijft Dr. J. SIJSMUS - en hoeveel deze waard is, dat meen ik duidelijk te hebben gezegd. Zij valt bovendien geheel weg, waar wij tegenover haar kunnen stellen een officieel stuk, betreffende de geboorteplaats en de ouders van PIETER DE HOOCH. In het protocol van den notaris J. DUIJFHUIJSEN Jr., den broeder van den schilder PIETER JACOBSZ. DUIJFHUIJSEN, te Rotterdam, vond ik (deel XXX f. 181) een testament, op 21 Dec. 1657 gepasseerd door "HENRICK DE HOGE, ,,metselaer, ende ARIAENTJE FLIPS DE WI] MER? echteluijden, burger ende burger- ,,inne deser stede, wonende ten eijnde in de Lombertstraet, aen de Westsijde ,,tegenover de Molewerf"- Hij benoemt tot erfgenamen zijne vrouw en "sijn soon DE HOOCH, sclailder, of bij gebreke van denselven sijn kint of kinderen ,,bij representatie, in egale portien". Zij benoemt tot erfgenaam "haar man ,,HENRICK DE HOOGHE". Hertrouwt hij, dan moet hij drie maanden na zijn trouwdag uitkeeren aan hare twee broeders PIETER FLIPS DE WIJMER en FLIP FLIPS DE WIJMER 1) en aan hare zuster GRIETGE FLIPSDR DE WIJMER2), of, bij gebreke van deze, aan hare kinderen, te zamen eens 100 car. gld. En "indien ,,haer man niet hertrouwt, dan is haer wil, dat de drievierde parten van hem en "haer, sooals hij die sal nalaeten, bij den voorsoon van haer man, PIETER DE "HOOGH voornoemd of sijne descendenten, en het resteerende vierde part bij de 1) PHILIPPHILIPSZ DE WIJMERtrouwde den sen Febr. 1647. - :":)In de laatste week van April 1664 overleed "MARGRIETEWEIJMERS wede". 175 "voornoemde bloedverwanten van haer sullen geerfd worden". De man onder- teekende het testament met ,.HENDRICK DHoOGHE", de vrouw met een handmerk. Wanneer is nu deze schilder PIETER DE HOOCH of HOOGH geboren? a ARIAENTJE FLIPS DE WIJMER noemt hem een voorzoon van haar man. Zij was met dezen getrouwd in de Gereformeerde kerk op Pinkstermaandag, 24 Mei 1649, nadat de proclamatidn hadden plaats gehad, te beginnen op 9 Mei. De inschrij- ving luidt: "HEIJNDERICK HEIJNDERICKS DE HOOGH, wedr, wonende op de "Visschersdijck, & ADRIAENTGE PHILIPS DE WIJMER, wede van JAN PIETERS »VAN DER HOEF, wonende op de Hoochstraet". Nu het eerste huwelijk van HENDRICK HENDRICKSZ. DE HOOGH opgespoord. Ik meen dit te hebben gevonden in de aanteekening in het Trouwregister der Gereformeerde kerk: 1628, 31 Dec. proclamatie, I629, 16 Januari voltrokken het huwelijk van,, -11EN DRICK HENDRICKSE ,,DE OOGE, J. G. van Rotterdam, woont in de Claversteeg, met ANNETGEN ,,PIETERS, wede van Mr. AERNOUT MOTE, woont opt Visser dijck". Dat er DE OOGE staat in plaats van DE HOOGH, het zal geen bezwaar tegen de identificatie ople- veren voor ieder, bekend met de slordige spelling der namen in de registers van dien tijd. Bovendien ziet men dat de eerste vrouw van HENDRICK HENDRICKSZ DE HOOGH woonde op de Visschersdijk, waar wij hem ook vinden wanneer hij zijn tweede huwelijk sluit. Daar ook stierf ANNETGE PIETERS. Zij werd begraven op Dinsdag 8 November 1648, en in het Register der begrafenissea staat als haar man vermeld "HENDERIJCK HENDERIJKSZ, op Visserdijck naest den Bommelschen ,,toren". ANNETGE PIETERS liet haar man niet kinderloos achter. Den 20en Dec. 1629, ongeveer elf maanden na het huwelijk, liet HEINDRICK HEINDRICKSEN in de Gereformeerde kerk eenen zoon doopen, die PIETER werd genoemd. De moeder woonde deze plechtigheid niet bij, maar wel op 1 Sept. 163 den doop van den . tweeden zoon CIIPvISTOFFEL, op 23 Mei 1633 den doop van den derden zoon JOHANNES, die spoedig overleed, daar het kind, dat 2 5 F ebr. i 63 5 gedoopt werd, denzelfden naam kreeg, en beide ouders waren ook tegenwoordig den 2 i en Oct. 163 7, toen weder een zoon werd gedoopt, die HENDRICK heette. Van al deze kl1lderen was in 1657 PIETER alleen nog in leven, gelijk wij gezien hebben. De moeder van PIETER DE HOOGH was vroedvrouw, zoowel blijkens de inschrijving van den doop op 21I Oct. 1637, waar de ouders worden genoemd "HEINDERICK HEINDERICKSE, ANNETGE moer vroetvrou", als blijkens de aantee- kening van haar overlijden op 8 Nov. 1648. Haar eerste man, Mr. AERNOUT MOTE, was waarschijnlijk barbier of chirurgijn. De tweede vrouw van HENDRICK HENDRICKSE DE HOOGH is vermoedelijk eene goede kennis der eerste geweest; zij bekleedde ten minste hetzelfde emplooi, gelijk blijkt uit de aanteekening van haar overlijden op 14 November 1660. 176 Om tot onzen schilder terug te keeren, herinner ik aan hetgeen BREDIUS omtrent den tijd zijner geboorte heeft medegedeeld.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hooch, Pieter De Also Known As Hoogh, Pieter De Hooghe, Pieter De Dutch, 1629 - 1684
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century Hooch, Pieter de Also known as Hoogh, Pieter de Hooghe, Pieter de Dutch, 1629 - 1684 Pieter de Hooch, Self-Portrait of Pieter de Hooch (?), oil on panel, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, inv. SK-A-181 BIOGRAPHY Pieter Hendricksz de Hooch (occasionally spelled de Hoogh) was baptized in the Reformed Church in Rotterdam on December 20, 1629. His father was a master bricklayer and his mother a midwife. His only recorded teacher was the landscape painter Nicolaes Pietersz Berchem (Dutch, 1620 - 1683), with whom he studied in Haarlem along with fellow pupil Jacob Ochtervelt (1634–1682). The exact dates of this apprenticeship are not known. Berchem’s interest in landscape apparently had little effect on De Hooch, whose earliest paintings are almost all barrack-room scenes. De Hooch is first recorded in Delft on August 5, 1652, when he and another painter, Hendrick van der Burch (1627–after 1666), witnessed the signing of a will. The following year he is documented as a painter and dienaar (servant or assistant) to a wealthy merchant named Justus de la Grange, a resident of both Delft and Leiden whose collection contained eleven of the artist’s paintings when it was inventoried in 1655. De Hooch witnessed a baptism in Leiden in 1653, but in 1654, when he married Jannetje van der Burch of Delft, he was living in Rotterdam. He and his wife, who was probably the sister of the painter Hendrick van der Burch, had seven children. De Hooch entered the Delft guild in 1655 and is recorded as having paid dues in 1656 and 1657.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Art, 17Th Century
    Dutch Art, 17th century The Dutch Golden Age was a period in the history of the Netherlands, roughly spanning the 17th century, in which Dutch trade, science, military, and art were among the most acclaimed in the world. The first section is characterized by the Thirty Years' War, which ended in 1648. The Golden Age continued in peacetime during the Dutch Republic until the end of the century. The transition by the Netherlands to the foremost maritime and economic power in the world has been called the "Dutch Miracle" by historian K. W. Swart. Adriaen van Ostade (1610 – 1685) was a Dutch Golden Age painter of genre works. He and his brother were pupils of Frans Hals and like him, spent most of their lives in Haarlem. A01 The Painter in his Workshop 1633 A02 Resting Travelers 1671 David Teniers the Younger (1610 – 1690) was a Flemish painter, printmaker, draughtsman, miniaturist painter, staffage painter, copyist and art curator. He was an extremely versatile artist known for his prolific output. He was an innovator in a wide range of genres such as history, genre, landscape, portrait and still life. He is now best remembered as the leading Flemish genre painter of his day. Teniers is particularly known for developing the peasant genre, the tavern scene, pictures of collections and scenes with alchemists and physicians. A03 Peasant Wedding 1650 A04 Archduke Leopold Wilhelm in his gallery in Brussels Gerrit Dou (1613 – 1675), also known as Gerard and Douw or Dow, was a Dutch Golden Age painter, whose small, highly polished paintings are typical of the Leiden fijnschilders.
    [Show full text]
  • Hooch, Pieter De Also Known As Hoogh, Pieter De Hooghe, Pieter De Dutch, 1629 - 1684
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century Hooch, Pieter de Also known as Hoogh, Pieter de Hooghe, Pieter de Dutch, 1629 - 1684 Pieter de Hooch, Self-Portrait of Pieter de Hooch (?), oil on panel, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, inv. SK-A-181 BIOGRAPHY Pieter Hendricksz de Hooch (occasionally spelled de Hoogh) was baptized in the Reformed Church in Rotterdam on December 20, 1629. His father was a master bricklayer and his mother a midwife. His only recorded teacher was the landscape painter Nicolaes Pietersz Berchem (Dutch, 1620 - 1683), with whom he studied in Haarlem along with fellow pupil Jacob Ochtervelt (1634–1682). The exact dates of this apprenticeship are not known. Berchem’s interest in landscape apparently had little effect on De Hooch, whose earliest paintings are almost all barrack-room scenes. De Hooch is first recorded in Delft on August 5, 1652, when he and another painter, Hendrick van der Burch (1627–after 1666), witnessed the signing of a will. The following year he is documented as a painter and dienaar (servant or assistant) to a wealthy merchant named Justus de la Grange, a resident of both Delft and Leiden whose collection contained eleven of the artist’s paintings when it was inventoried in 1655. De Hooch witnessed a baptism in Leiden in 1653, but in 1654, when he married Jannetje van der Burch of Delft, he was living in Rotterdam. He and his wife, who was probably the sister of the painter Hendrick van der Burch, had seven children. De Hooch entered the Delft guild in 1655 and is recorded as having paid dues in 1656 and 1657.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Steen: the Drawing Lesson
    Jan Steen THE DRAWING LESSON Jan Steen THE DRAWING LESSON John Walsh GETTY MUSEUM STUDIES ON ART Los ANGELES For my teacher Julius S. Held in gratitude Christopher Hudson, Publisher Cover: Mark Greenberg, Managing Editor Jan Steen (Dutch, 1626-1679). The Drawing Lesson, circa 1665 (detail). Oil on panel, Mollie Holtman, Editor 49.3 x 41 cm. (i93/s x i6î/4 in.). Los Angeles, Stacy Miyagawa, Production Coordinator J. Paul Getty Museum (83.PB.388). Jeffrey Cohen, Designer Lou Meluso, Photographer Frontispiece: Jan Steen. Self-Portrait, circa 1665. © 1996 The J. Paul Getty Museum Oil on canvas, 73 x 62 cm (283/4 x 243/ in.). 17985 Pacific Coast Highway 8 Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum (sK-A-383). Malibu, California 90265-5799 All works of art are reproduced (and photographs Mailing address: provided) courtesy of the owners unless other- P.O. BOX 2112 wise indicated. Santa Monica, California 90407-2112 Typography by G & S Typesetting, Inc., Library of Congress Austin, Texas Cataloging-in-Publication Data Printed by Typecraft, Inc., Pasadena, California Walsh, John, 1937- Bound by Roswell Bookbinding, Phoenix, Jan Steen : the Drawing lesson / John Walsh, Arizona p. cm.—(Getty Museum studies on art) Includes bibliographic references. ISBN 0-89326-392-4 1. Steen, Jan, 1626-1679 Drawing lesson. 2. Steen, Jan, 1626-1679—Criticism and interpretation. I. Title. II. Series. ND653.S8A64 1996 759.9492—dc20 96-3913 CIP CONTENTS Introduction i A Familiar Face 5 Picturing the Workshop 27 The Training of a Painter 43 Another Look Around 61 Notes on the Literature 78 Acknowledgments 88 Final page folds out, providing a reference color plate of The Drawing Lesson INTRODUCTION In a spacious vaulted room a painter leans over to correct a drawing by one of his two pupils, a young boy and a beautifully dressed girl, who look on [FIGURE i and FOLDOUT].
    [Show full text]
  • Print, Amsterdam, 1980), 35
    Pieter de Hooch (Rotterdam 1629 – in or after 1684 Amsterdam) How to cite Bakker, Piet. “Pieter de Hooch” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 3rd ed. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. and Lara Yeager-Crasselt. New York, 2020–. https://theleidencollection.com/artists/pieter-de- hooch/ (accessed September 28, 2021). A PDF of every version of this biography is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs. © 2021 The Leiden Collection Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Pieter de Hooch Page 2 of 9 According to the single sentence Houbraken devoted to Pieter de Hooch, the artist “was outstanding in the painting of interiors with companies of gentlemen and ladies.”[1] De Hooch was born in Rotterdam in 1629. His parents were the master bricklayer Hendrick de Hooch (d. 1657) and the midwife Annetge Pieters (d. 1648). Pieter was twenty years old when his father took a second wife, Adriaentje Philipsdr de Wijmer. He grew up on the Vissersdijk, near the Blaak, before the family moved in 1651 into a house on the Lombartstraat that his father had purchased for 1700 guilders. Hendrick had four sons from his first marriage, but as emerges from his will, Pieter was the only one still alive in 1657. In 1661 Hendrick married Christina Langenberg of Middelburg, where the couple settled. Although Houbraken claims that De Hooch, together with his fellow townsman Jacob Ochtervelt (1634–82), “studied for a period with the renowned N.
    [Show full text]
  • Woman and Child in a Courtyard
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century Pieter de Hooch Dutch, 1629 - 1684 Woman and Child in a Courtyard 1658/1660 oil on canvas overall: 73.5 x 66 cm (28 15/16 x 26 in.) Inscription: lower left on trough: P D Hooch Widener Collection 1942.9.34 ENTRY Near the old town wall of Delft, the site of many of De Hooch’s courtyard paintings, two gentlemen and a woman are seated in a small wooden arbor, drinking wine. A maidservant carrying an earthenware jug and a basket, covered with a white cloth, and a little girl holding a birdcage cross the courtyard on their way toward a water pump that is attached to the house on the left. The two sets of steps seen through the open doors behind them seem to lead to the city ramparts. This idyllic view of city life with spacious courtyards, trees, and vines contains compositional elements that are found in two other of De Hooch’s paintings of this period. The arbor, the wall, and the stairs leading to the door in the wall form the setting for his painting A Family in a Courtyard, 1658–1660, in Vienna [fig. 1]. That work reveals that the arbor projects out from the wall and that its columns and capitals are made of flat boards attached to a wooden framework. The same arbor, wall, stairs, and water pump are also visible in A Woman and a Maid in a Courtyard, c. 1660 (the last digit is illegible), in the National Gallery, London [fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Pieter De Hooch in Delft from the SHADOW of VERMEER
    pieter de hooch in Delft FROM THE SHADOW OF VERMEER PRESS RELEASE Delft, 29-08-2019 DELFT’S INFLUENCE ON PIETER DE HOOCH GREATER THAN THOUGHT NEW INSIGHTS FROM MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXHIBITION The painter Pieter de Hooch was considerably more ‘Delft’ than had been thought. New research initiated by the Museum Prinsenhof Delft has revealed that the artistic climate of Delft, where De Hooch lived and worked from 1652, made it possible for the artist to undergo his unique development and become an innovator in painting. Between 1655 and 1658, he rapidly translated the achievements of a number of Delft painters of church interiors in their treatment of light and perspective into a new type of painting: the Delft courtyard. In doing so, De Hooch made greater use of existing Delft architectural elements than was previously assumed. Research has revealed, moreover, that Pieter de Hooch had Delft roots. During the past two years, six researchers cooperated on a multidisciplinary project initiated in association with the coming exhibition Pieter de Hooch in Delft: From the shadow of Vermeer (11 October through 16 February 2020) at the Museum Prinsenhof Delft. MUSEUM PRINSENHOF DELFT RESEARCH BY ANITA JANSEN Without the benefit of Delft’s extraordinary artistic atmosphere, Pieter de Hooch would probably never have been the artist we now know. Between approximately 1645 and 1660, the city of Delft emerged as one of the leading artistic centres of the Netherlands. In 1655, after De Hooch had established himself as an artist in the early 1650s, he turned his attention to new genres, revealing for the first time his fascination for perspective and light.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Thesis Draft F1
    HOME PERFECTED: PIETER DE HOOCH AND NEW IDEALS OF DOMESTICITY IN THE DUTCH REPUBLIC by Theresa L. Handwerk A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History Spring 2011 Copyright 2011 Theresa L. Handwerk All Rights Reserved HOME PERFECTED: PIETER DE HOOCH AND NEW IDEALS OF DOMESTICITY IN THE DUTCH REPUBLIC by Theresa L. Handwerk Approved: __________________________________________________________ H. Perry Chapman, Ph.D. Professor in charge of Thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Nina M. Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Art History Approved: __________________________________________________________ George H. Watson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Charles G. Riordan, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisor, Professor H. Perry Chapman, whose critical guidance and support were crucial in developing my seminar paper into a Master’s Thesis. I also would like to thank my second reader Professor David Stone for his valuable comments and suggestions. In addition, I would like to thank Professor Jane C. Hutchison for her inspirational lectures on how to look at Dutch art, and Professor Jolanda Vanderwal Taylor for her continued support and for teaching me all things Dutch. Finally, I also would like to thank Marsely Kehoe, Isabelle Havet and Victor Steinbok for much-appreciated support as well as help and advice in reviewing my manuscript. I dedicate this thesis to my family, whose belief in me never wavered.
    [Show full text]
  • Paintings As Information
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1985 Paintings as Information: The Anthropology of Images: A Consideration of Late Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Netherlandish Painting in Relation to Foodways and Historical Archeology Melissa Payne College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Payne, Melissa, "Paintings as Information: The Anthropology of Images: A Consideration of Late Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Netherlandish Painting in Relation to Foodways and Historical Archeology" (1985). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625293. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-5t4z-7d60 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PAINTINGS AS INFORMATION: THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF IMAGES A Consideration of Late Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Netherlandish Painting in Relation to Foodways and Historical Archeology A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Melissa Payne 1985 APPROVAL .SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, December 1985 Norman Bark a, Chairman. £ M 4 J 1 a& Rita Aright Marley Brown Colonial Riliiamsburg Foundation ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Pieter De Hooch a Woman Preparing Bread and Butter for a Boy
    PIETER DE HOOCH A WOMAN PREPARING BREAD AND BUTTER FOR A BOY PIETER DE HOOCH A WOMAN PREPARING BREAD AND BUTTER FOR A BOY WAY NE FRANITS THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM D LOS ANGELES This book is affectionately dedicated to Linnea and Aidan, who prove the maxim that life can indeed imitate art. © 2006 J. Paul Getty Trust Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Getty Publications Franits, Wayne E. 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 500 Pieter de Hooch : A woman preparing bread and butter for a boy / Los Angeles, California 90049-1682 Wayne Franits. www.getty.edu p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Mark Greenberg, Editor in Chief ISBN-13: 978-0-89236-844-0 (pbk.) iSBN-io: 0-89236-844-6 (pbk.) Mollie Holtman, Series Editor i. Hooch, Pieter de. Woman preparing bread and butter for a boy. Cynthia Newman Bohn, Copy Editor 2. Hooch, Pieter de —Criticism and interpretation. 3. J. Paul Getty Catherine Lorenz, Designer Museum. I. Hooch, Pieter de. II. Title. ReBecca Bogner and Stacy Miyagawa, ND653.H75A73 2006 Production Coordinators 759.9492-dc22 Lou Meluso, Charles Passela, Jack Ross, Photographers 2006010091 Typography by Diane Franco All photographs are copyrighted by the issuing institutions or their owners, unless Printed and bound in China otherwise indicated. Cover: Pieter de Hooch (Dutch, 1629-1684), A Woman Preparing Bread and Butter for a Boy, circa 1661-63 (detail). Oil on canvas, 68.3 x 53 cm (26% x 20% in.). Los Angeles, J. Paul Getty Museum, 84^.47. Frontispiece: Detail of windows from A Woman Preparing Bread and Butter for a Boy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bedroom 1658/1660 Oil on Canvas Overall: 51 X 60 Cm (20 1/16 X 23 5/8 In.) Framed: 73 X 82.6 X 8.9 Cm (28 3/4 X 32 1/2 X 3 1/2 In.) Widener Collection 1942.9.33
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century Pieter de Hooch Dutch, 1629 - 1684 The Bedroom 1658/1660 oil on canvas overall: 51 x 60 cm (20 1/16 x 23 5/8 in.) framed: 73 x 82.6 x 8.9 cm (28 3/4 x 32 1/2 x 3 1/2 in.) Widener Collection 1942.9.33 ENTRY De Hooch painted this intimate scene of domestic life around 1658 to 1660, during the last years of his Delft period. The painting depicts an everyday occurrence, in which a child opens a door to an inner room, where its mother, busy with her household chores, airs out the bedcovers. The scene, however, is instilled with a sense of intimacy and warmth that transcends the mundane subject matter. De Hooch achieved this effect through his treatment of light and his sensitive arrangement of the interior space. Light enters the room from two sources: the double windows on the left and the open door and window at the front of the house. As the light streams through the child’s hair, it illuminates the youngster with a palpable, radiant glow. It also enlivens the interior space in the way it plays across a variety of surfaces. De Hooch suggests, for example, the different character of light as it passes through an exterior window, through an interior window, and through both an exterior and interior window. He deftly differentiates between the sheen of reflections off the marble floor and the more spectacular highlights on the orange tile floor.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Theory on the Origin of Two Paintings by Johannes Vermeer (1632–1675) of Delft
    English translation of “Een nieuwe theorie over twee schilderijen van Johannes Vermeer (1632‐1675)”, in: Jaarboek Delfia Batavorum 28 (2018), pp. 9‐34. [published 23 May 2019]. Huib J. Zuidervaart A New Theory on the Origin of Two Paintings by Johannes Vermeer (1632–1675) of Delft A search in the archives of Delft has revealed a location where Johannes Vermeer may be situated two of his paintings, today known as The Glass of Wine and The Lady with Two Gentlemen. A third painting, now known as Girl Interrupted in her Music, may also relate to this location. This place was not Vermeer’s atelier, but a mansion outside Delft: the home of a wealthy gunpowder family who, according to the theory exposed here, commissioned these paintings, probably as wedding gifts for the heirs of the family business. This new theory has led also to new interpretations of other features in these paintings. Johannes Vermeer (1632–1675) of Delft has been the subject of a flood of books and articles since his re- 1a. The Glass of Wine / Das Glas Wein – Oil on canvas, 65 x 77 cm , c. 1658‐1661. (Staatliche Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Gemälde‐ discovery as a superb painter in the late nineteenth galerie, Berlin, inv. 912c). century. In more recent years there has been much speculation about his possible use of a camera obscura in the process of composing his paintings.1 A few years ago, my colleague Marlise Rijks and I were able to prove that such a device was present in Delft at the time of Vermeer.
    [Show full text]