Mcintyre, Jennifer Ruth (2020) Genetic Markers of Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Parasites of Ruminants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mcintyre, Jennifer Ruth (2020) Genetic Markers of Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Parasites of Ruminants McIntyre, Jennifer Ruth (2020) Genetic markers of anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal parasites of ruminants. PhD thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/79021/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Genetic Markers of Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Parasites of Ruminants Jennifer Ruth McIntyre BVM&S BVetSci(Hons) MRCVS Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences February 2020 © Jennifer Ruth McIntyre, 2020 2 Abstract Parasitic gastroenteritis is the primary production limiting disease of sheep in the UK and is a considerable welfare concern. A global problem, it is caused by nematode parasites and mixed species infections can be common. In the UK, the primary pathogen in growing lambs is Teladorsagia circumcincta, an abomasal parasite of small ruminants, causing severe pathology and reduced weight gain. T. circumcincta is expertly adapted to both the host and the farming year and control is extremely difficult. The majority of UK farmers will use anthelmintics to manage parasitic gastroenteritis. Nevertheless, anthelmintic resistance is increasing, reducing control options. Many farmers will now dose sheep with a macrocyclic lactone (e.g. ivermectin) to treat T. circumcincta as this species has developed resistance to multiple anthelmintic classes. Unfortunately, over fifty percent of farms in recent UK studies had detectable ivermectin resistance. There is a pressing need to conserve anthelmintics for future use. However, the mechanism of ivermectin resistance is unknown, and the lack of a sensitive test for ivermectin resistance limits research into resistance spread and development. Many excellent studies have investigated ivermectin resistance in nematode parasites, however mutations responsible for ivermectin resistance remain elusive. The purpose of this PhD was to perform a genome wide association study to identify genomic regions under ivermectin selection within UK T. circumcincta field populations. L3 progeny were sequenced pre- and post- ivermectin treatment using next generation sequencing techniques (ddRAD-Seq and Pool-Seq) and population genetics analyses were performed. Multiple loci were genetically differentiated between pre- and post-ivermectin populations. However, the reference genomes used were highly fragmented and the number of loci under selection cannot be concluded. Genes identified included those with neuronal functions, metabolic and regulatory genes. Many genes had associations with pharyngeal structures and chemosensory behaviour. Nevertheless, multiple copies of genes expected to be single copy were detected in both reference genomes and these may have affected read alignment and results. The work performed here provides an important basis for future studies, and has generated high quality next generation sequenced resources from two UK field populations of T. circumcincta. 3 Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................ 8 List of Figures .............................................................................. 10 List of Accompanying Material ........................................................... 12 Acknowledgement ......................................................................... 13 Author’s Declaration ...................................................................... 14 Abbreviations .............................................................................. 15 1 Introduction ........................................................................... 19 1.1 Sheep Farming Systems ......................................................... 19 1.2 Parasitic Gastroenteritis ........................................................ 21 1.3 Teladorsagiosis ................................................................... 22 1.4 Management of Parasitic Gastroenteritis .................................... 24 1.5 Anthelmintic Resistance ........................................................ 28 1.6 In vitro tests of anthelmintic sensitivity ..................................... 29 1.7 Prevalence of Anthelmintic Resistance ...................................... 33 1.8 Ivermectin Resistance .......................................................... 35 1.8.1 IVM resistance is inherited as a fully or partially dominant trait .... 35 1.8.2 IVM affects motility, fecundity and reproduction ..................... 36 1.8.3 IVM interacts with ligand gated ion channels, but the cause of resistance is unknown ............................................................... 37 1.9 Benzimidazole Resistance ...................................................... 44 1.10 Levamisole Resistance ........................................................ 45 1.11 Monepantel Resistance ....................................................... 48 1.12 What factors affect the genetic footprint of resistance? ............... 50 1.13 Why might anthelmintic resistance have arisen so rapidly? ............ 51 1.14 What are the concerns with anthelmintic resistance? ................... 52 1.15 Is there hope in the face of anthelmintic resistance? ................... 53 1.16 Investigating the genetic basis of drug resistance using next generation sequencing ............................................................................... 55 2 Materials and Methods ............................................................... 61 2.1 Parasite material ................................................................ 61 2.1.1 Laboratory isolates ......................................................... 61 MTci2 (Moredun T. circumcincta 2) ...................................................................................... 61 MTci5 (Moredun T. circumcincta 5) ...................................................................................... 61 2.1.2 Farm 1 ........................................................................ 61 2.1.3 Farm 2 ........................................................................ 61 2.1.4 Farm 3 ........................................................................ 62 2.2 Sample Collection and Processing ............................................. 62 2.2.1 Collection of faecal samples .............................................. 62 4 2.2.2 Faecal egg counts........................................................... 62 2.2.3 Coprocultures and Baermannisation of L3 .............................. 63 2.2.4 Morphological examination of L3 ......................................... 64 2.2.5 Faecal egg count reduction test .......................................... 64 2.3 Bioassays .......................................................................... 64 2.3.1 Egg hatch test ............................................................... 65 2.3.2 Larval development test ................................................... 66 2.4 Molecular Biology ................................................................ 67 2.4.1 Lysate protocol ............................................................. 67 2.4.2 Speciation of strongyles by PCR .......................................... 67 2.4.3 Microsatellite PCR and Analysis .......................................... 69 2.4.4 Pyrosequencing ............................................................. 72 2.4.5 hprt-1 allele specific PCR ................................................. 74 2.5 Genomic DNA Library Preparation for Next Generation Sequencing: ddRAD-Seq and Pool-Seq ............................................................... 76 2.5.1 Whole Genome Amplification of DNA for ddRAD-Seq .................. 76 2.5.2 Double digest of WGA DNA ................................................ 77 2.5.3 Adaptor ligation ............................................................. 77 2.5.4 Size selection, Illumina Library Prep and DNA Sequencing ........... 78 2.5.5 Preparation of Genomic DNA Libraries for Pool-Seq ................... 78 2.6 Bioinformatics: Reference genomes .......................................... 79 2.7 Bioinformatics: ddRAD-Seq ..................................................... 80 2.7.1 Cleaning and demultiplexing of ddRAD-Seq reads ..................... 80 2.7.2 Alignment of ddRAD-Seq reads to Tci2 genome ........................ 80 2.7.3 Formation and filtering of RADloci ....................................... 81 2.7.4 Population structure and Kinship analysis .............................. 81 2.7.5 Hardy Weinberg analysis ................................................... 82 2.7.6 Linkage disequilibrium analysis ........................................... 82 2.7.7 SNP density across the genome ........................................... 83 2.7.8 ddRAD-Seq genetic differentiation analysis ............................ 83 2.8 Bioinformatics: Preliminary annotation of Tci2
Recommended publications
  • The Anthelmintic Niclosamide Is a Potent TMEM16A Antagonist That Fully Bronchodilates Airways
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/254888; this version posted January 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. The anthelmintic niclosamide is a potent TMEM16A antagonist that fully bronchodilates airways Kent Miner1, Benxian Liu1, Paul Wang2, Katja Labitzke2,†, Kevin Gaida1, Jian Jeffrey Chen3, Longbin Liu3,†, Anh Leith1,†, Robin Elliott1, Kathryn Henckels1, Esther Trueblood4,†, Kelly Hensley4, Xing-Zhong Xia1, Oliver Homann5, Brian Bennett1, Mike Fiorino1, John Whoriskey1, Sabine Escobar1, Gang Yu1, Joe McGivern2, Min Wong1, Teresa L. Born1,†, Alison Budelsky1,†, Mike Comeau1, Dirk Smith1,†, Jonathan Phillips1, James A. Johnston1, Kerstin Weikl2,†, David 2 1,* 2,†.* 1,† ,* Powers , Deanna Mohn , Andreas Hochheimer , John K. Sullivan 1Department of Inflammation Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA and Seattle, WA, USA 2Department of Therapeutic Discovery, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA and Regensburg, Germany 3Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 4Department of Comparative Biology and Safety Sciences, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA, Thousand Oaks, CA and South San Francisco, CA, USA 5Genome Analysis Unit, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA †Present address; see Additional Information section *Corresponding authors. E-mails: [email protected] (J.K.S); [email protected] (A.H.); [email protected] (D.M.) Abstract There is an unmet need in severe asthma where approximately 40% of patients exhibit poor -agonist responsiveness, suffer daily symptoms and show frequent exacerbations. 2+ Antagonists of the Ca -activated-Cl¯ channel, TMEM16A, offers a new mechanism to bronchodilate airways and block the multiple contractiles operating in severe disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthelmintic Activity of Yeast Particle-Encapsulated Terpenes
    molecules Article Anthelmintic Activity of Yeast Particle-Encapsulated Terpenes Zeynep Mirza 1, Ernesto R. Soto 1 , Yan Hu 1,2, Thanh-Thanh Nguyen 1, David Koch 1, Raffi V. Aroian 1 and Gary R. Ostroff 1,* 1 Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA; [email protected] (Z.M.); [email protected] (E.R.S.); [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (T.-T.N.); [email protected] (D.K.); raffi[email protected] (R.V.A.) 2 Department of Biology, Worcester State University, Worcester, MA 01602, USA * Correspondence: gary.ostroff@umassmed.edu; Tel.: 508-856-1930 Academic Editor: Vaclav Vetvicka Received: 2 June 2020; Accepted: 24 June 2020; Published: 27 June 2020 Abstract: Soil-transmitted nematodes (STN) infect 1–2 billion of the poorest people worldwide. Only benzimidazoles are currently used in mass drug administration, with many instances of reduced activity. Terpenes are a class of compounds with anthelmintic activity. Thymol, a natural monoterpene phenol, was used to help eradicate hookworms in the U.S. South circa 1910. However, the use of terpenes as anthelmintics was discontinued because of adverse side effects associated with high doses and premature stomach absorption. Furthermore, the dose–response activity of specific terpenes against STNs has been understudied. Here we used hollow, porous yeast particles (YPs) to efficiently encapsulate (>95%) high levels of terpenes (52% w/w) and evaluated their anthelmintic activity on hookworms (Ancylostoma ceylanicum), a rodent parasite (Nippostrongylus brasiliensis), and whipworm (Trichuris muris). We identified YP–terpenes that were effective against all three parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiparasitic Properties of Cardiovascular Agents Against Human Intravascular Parasite Schistosoma Mansoni
    pharmaceuticals Article Antiparasitic Properties of Cardiovascular Agents against Human Intravascular Parasite Schistosoma mansoni Raquel Porto 1, Ana C. Mengarda 1, Rayssa A. Cajas 1, Maria C. Salvadori 2 , Fernanda S. Teixeira 2 , Daniel D. R. Arcanjo 3 , Abolghasem Siyadatpanah 4, Maria de Lourdes Pereira 5 , Polrat Wilairatana 6,* and Josué de Moraes 1,* 1 Research Center for Neglected Diseases, Guarulhos University, Praça Tereza Cristina 229, São Paulo 07023-070, SP, Brazil; [email protected] (R.P.); [email protected] (A.C.M.); [email protected] (R.A.C.) 2 Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-060, SP, Brazil; [email protected] (M.C.S.); [email protected] (F.S.T.) 3 Department of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina 64049-550, PI, Brazil; [email protected] 4 Ferdows School of Paramedical and Health, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand 9717853577, Iran; [email protected] 5 CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials & Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; [email protected] 6 Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.W.); [email protected] (J.d.M.) Citation: Porto, R.; Mengarda, A.C.; Abstract: The intravascular parasitic worm Schistosoma mansoni is a causative agent of schistosomiasis, Cajas, R.A.; Salvadori, M.C.; Teixeira, a disease of great global public health significance. Praziquantel is the only drug available to F.S.; Arcanjo, D.D.R.; Siyadatpanah, treat schistosomiasis and there is an urgent demand for new anthelmintic agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiprotozoal and Antitumor Activity of Natural Polycyclic Endoperoxides: Origin, Structures and Biological Activity
    molecules Review Antiprotozoal and Antitumor Activity of Natural Polycyclic Endoperoxides: Origin, Structures and Biological Activity Valery M. Dembitsky 1,2,*, Ekaterina Ermolenko 2, Nick Savidov 1, Tatyana A. Gloriozova 3 and Vladimir V. Poroikov 3 1 Centre for Applied Research, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Lethbridge College, 3000 College Drive South, Lethbridge, AB T1K 1L6, Canada; [email protected] 2 A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, 17 Palchevsky Str., 690041 Vladivostok, Russia; [email protected] 3 Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, 10 Pogodinskaya Str., 119121 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (T.A.G.); [email protected] (V.V.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-403-320-3202 (ext. 5463); Fax: +1-888-858-8517 Abstract: Polycyclic endoperoxides are rare natural metabolites found and isolated in plants, fungi, and marine invertebrates. The purpose of this review is a comparative analysis of the pharmacological potential of these natural products. According to PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances) estimates, they are more likely to exhibit antiprotozoal and antitumor properties. Some of them are now widely used in clinical medicine. All polycyclic endoperoxides presented in this article demonstrate antiprotozoal activity and can be divided into three groups. The third group includes endoperoxides, which show weak antiprotozoal activity with a reliability of up to 70%, and this group includes only 1.1% of metabolites. The second group includes the largest number of endoperoxides, Citation: Dembitsky, V.M.; which are 65% and show average antiprotozoal activity with a confidence level of 70 to 90%. Lastly, Ermolenko, E.; Savidov, N.; the third group includes endoperoxides, which are 33.9% and show strong antiprotozoal activity with Gloriozova, T.A.; Poroikov, V.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Pharmacology in 1999: Compounds with Antibacterial
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C 132 (2002) 315–339 Review Marine pharmacology in 1999: compounds with antibacterial, anticoagulant, antifungal, anthelmintic, anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet, antiprotozoal and antiviral activities affecting the cardiovascular, endocrine, immune and nervous systems, and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action Alejandro M.S. Mayera, *, Mark T. Hamannb aDepartment of Pharmacology, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, 555 31st Street, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA bSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, Faser Hall University, MS 38677, USA Received 28 November 2001; received in revised form 30 May 2002; accepted 31 May 2002 Abstract This review, a sequel to the 1998 review, classifies 63 peer-reviewed articles on the basis of the reported preclinical pharmacological properties of marine chemicals derived from a diverse group of marine animals, algae, fungi and bacteria. In all, 21 marine chemicals demonstrated anthelmintic, antibacterial, anticoagulant, antifungal, antimalarial, antiplatelet, antituberculosis or antiviral activities. An additional 23 compounds had significant effects on the cardiovascular, sympathomimetic or the nervous system, as well as possessed anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressant or fibrinolytic effects. Finally, 22 marine compounds were reported to act on a variety of molecular targets, and thus could potentially contribute to several pharmacological classes. Thus, during 1999 pharmacological research with marine chemicals continued
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Long-Acting, Broad Spectra Anthelmintic Treatments on The
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Efects of long‑acting, broad spectra anthelmintic treatments on the rumen microbial community compositions of grazing sheep Christina D. Moon1*, Luis Carvalho1, Michelle R. Kirk1, Alan F. McCulloch2, Sandra Kittelmann3, Wayne Young1, Peter H. Janssen1 & Dave M. Leathwick1 Anthelmintic treatment of adult ewes is widely practiced to remove parasite burdens in the expectation of increased ruminant productivity. However, the broad activity spectra of many anthelmintic compounds raises the possibility of impacts on the rumen microbiota. To investigate this, 300 grazing ewes were allocated to treatment groups that included a 100‑day controlled release capsule (CRC) containing albendazole and abamectin, a long‑acting moxidectin injection (LAI), and a non‑treated control group (CON). Rumen bacterial, archaeal and protozoal communities at day 0 were analysed to identify 36 sheep per treatment with similar starting compositions. Microbiota profles, including those for the rumen fungi, were then generated for the selected sheep at days 0, 35 and 77. The CRC treatment signifcantly impacted the archaeal community, and was associated with increased relative abundances of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium, Methanosphaera sp. ISO3‑F5, and Methanomassiliicoccaceae Group 12 sp. ISO4‑H5 compared to the control group. In contrast, the LAI treatment increased the relative abundances of members of the Veillonellaceae and resulted in minor changes to the bacterial and fungal communities by day 77. Overall, the anthelmintic treatments resulted in few, but highly signifcant, changes to the rumen microbiota composition. Anthelmintic treatment of adult ewes is practiced by about 80% of sheep farmers in New Zealand1, and many of these treatments use active compounds with broad-spectrum persistent activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Pyrvinium, an Anthelmintic Drug, As a Novel Anti
    molecules Article Identification of Pyrvinium, an Anthelmintic Drug, as a Novel Anti-Adipogenic Compound Based on the Gene Expression Microarray and Connectivity Map Zonggui Wang 1, Zhong Dai 2,3, Zhicong Luo 2,3 and Changqing Zuo 2,3,* 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, China 2 Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Zhanjiang 524023, Guangdong, China 3 School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-769-22896551 Received: 3 June 2019; Accepted: 27 June 2019; Published: 28 June 2019 Abstract: Obesity is a serious health problem, while the current anti-obesity drugs are not very effective. The Connectivity Map (C-Map), an in-silico drug screening approach based on gene expression profiles, has recently been indicated as a promising strategy for drug repositioning. In this study, we performed mRNA expression profile analysis using microarray technology and identified 435 differentially expressed genes (DEG) during adipogenesis in both C3H10T1/2 and 3T3-L1 cells. Then, DEG signature was uploaded into C-Map, and using pattern-matching methods we discovered that pyrvinium, a classical anthelminthic, is a novel anti-adipogenic differentiation agent. Pyrvinium suppressed adipogenic differentiation in a dose-dependent manner, as evidenced by Oil Red O staining and the mRNA levels of adipogenic markers. Furthermore, we identified that the inhibitory effect of pyrvinium was resulted primarily from the early stage of adipogenesis. Molecular studies showed that pyrvinium downregulated the expression of key transcription factors C/EBPa and PPARγ. The mRNA levels of notch target genes Hes1 and Hey1 were obviously reduced after pyrvinium treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasiticides: Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, Moxidectin Livestock
    Parasiticides: Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, Moxidectin Livestock 1 Identification of Petitioned Substance* 2 3 Chemical Names: 48 Ivermectin: Heart Guard, Sklice, Stomectol, 4 Moxidectin:(1'R,2R,4Z,4'S,5S,6S,8'R,10'E,13'R,14'E 49 Ivomec, Mectizan, Ivexterm, Scabo 6 5 ,16'E,20'R,21'R,24'S)-21',24'-Dihydroxy-4 50 Thiabendazole: Mintezol, Tresaderm, Arbotect 6 (methoxyimino)-5,11',13',22'-tetramethyl-6-[(2E)- 51 Albendazole: Albenza 7 4-methyl-2-penten-2-yl]-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2'H- 52 Levamisole: Ergamisol 8 spiro[pyran-2,6'-[3,7,1 9]trioxatetracyclo 53 Morantel tartrate: Rumatel 9 [15.6.1.14,8.020,24] pentacosa[10,14,16,22] tetraen]- 54 Pyrantel: Banminth, Antiminth, Cobantril 10 2'-one; (2aE, 4E,5’R,6R,6’S,8E,11R,13S,- 55 Doramectin: Dectomax 11 15S,17aR,20R,20aR,20bS)-6’-[(E)-1,2-Dimethyl-1- 56 Eprinomectin: Ivomec, Longrange 12 butenyl]-5’,6,6’,7,10,11,14,15,17a,20,20a,20b- 57 Piperazine: Wazine, Pig Wormer 13 dodecahydro-20,20b-dihydroxy-5’6,8,19-tetra- 58 14 methylspiro[11,15-methano-2H,13H,17H- CAS Numbers: 113507-06-5; 15 furo[4,3,2-pq][2,6]benzodioxacylooctadecin-13,2’- Moxidectin: 16 [2H]pyrano]-4’,17(3’H)-dione,4’-(E)-(O- Fenbendazole: 43210-67-9; 70288-86-7 17 methyloxime) Ivermectin: 59 Thiabendazole: 148-79-8 18 Fenbendazole: methyl N-(6-phenylsulfanyl-1H- 60 Albendazole: 54965-21-8 19 benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate 61 Levamisole: 14769-72-4 20 Ivermectin: 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a +22,23- 21 dihydroavermectin B1b 62 Morantel tartrate: 26155-31-7 63 Pyrantel: 22204-24-6 22 Thiabendazole: 4-(1H-1,3-benzodiazol-2-yl)-1,3- 23 thiazole
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism of Action of Praziquantel: Can New Drugs Exploit Similar Mechanisms?
    The mechanism of action of praziquantel: can new drugs exploit similar mechanisms? Charlotte M. Thomas1,2 and David J Timson1,3* 1 School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK. 2 Institute for Global Food Security, Queen’s University Belfast, 18-30 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5BN, UK. 3 School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Huxley Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK. *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Huxley Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, BN2 4GJ. UK. Telephone +44(0)1273 641623 Fax +44(0)1273 642090 Email [email protected] 1 Abstract Praziquantel (PZQ) is the drug of choice for treating infection with worms from the genus Schistosoma. The drug is effective, cheap and has few side-effects. However, despite its use in millions of patients for over 40 years its molecular mechanism of action remains elusive. Early studies demonstrated that PZQ disrupts calcium ion homeostasis in the worm and the current consensus is that it antagonises voltage-gated calcium channels. It is hypothesised that disruption of these channels results in uncontrolled calcium ion influx leading to uncontrolled muscle contraction and paralysis. However, other experimental studies have suggested a role for myosin regulatory light chains and adenosine uptake in the drug’s mechanism of action. Assuming voltage-gated calcium channels do represent the main molecular target of PZQ, the precise binding site for the drug remains to be identified. Unlike other commonly used anti-parasitic drugs, there are few definitive reports of resistance to PZQ in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Pharmacology in 2003–4: Marine
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part C 145 (2007) 553–581 www.elsevier.com/locate/cbpc Marine pharmacology in 2003–4: Marine compounds with anthelmintic antibacterial, anticoagulant, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, antiplatelet, antiprotozoal, antituberculosis, and antiviral activities; affecting the cardiovascular, immune and nervous systems, and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action ⁎ Alejandro M.S. Mayer a, , Abimael D. Rodríguez b, Roberto G.S. Berlinck c, Mark T. Hamann d a Department of Pharmacology, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, 555 31st Street, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, USA b Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931, USA c Instituto de Quimica de Sao Carlos, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos, 13560-970, Brazil d School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, Faser Hall, University, Mississippi 38677, USA Received 28 October 2006; received in revised form 29 January 2007; accepted 30 January 2007 Available online 9 February 2007 Abstract The current marine pharmacology review that covers the peer-reviewed literature during 2003 and 2004 is a sequel to the authors' 1998–2002 reviews, and highlights the preclinical pharmacology of 166 marine chemicals derived from a diverse group of marine animals, algae, fungi and bacteria. Anthelmintic, antibacterial, anticoagulant, antifungal, antimalarial, antiplatelet, antiprotozoal, antituberculosis or antiviral activities were reported for 67 marine chemicals. Additionally 45 marine compounds were shown to have significant effects on the cardiovascular, immune and nervous system as well as possessing anti-inflammatory effects. Finally, 54 marine compounds were reported to act on a variety of molecular targets and thus may potentially contribute to several pharmacological classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Stromectol® (Ivermectin)
    TABLETS STROMECTOL® (IVERMECTIN) DESCRIPTION STROMECTOL* (Ivermectin) is a semisynthetic, anthelmintic agent for oral administration. Ivermectin is derived from the avermectins, a class of highly active broad-spectrum, anti-parasitic agents isolated from the fermentation products of Streptomyces avermitilis. Ivermectin is a mixture containing at least 90% 5-O­ demethyl-22,23-dihydroavermectin A1a and less than 10% 5-O-demethyl-25-de(1-methylpropyl)-22,23-dihydro­ 25-(1-methylethyl)avermectin A1a, generally referred to as 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a and B1b, or H2B1a and H2B1b, respectively. The respective empirical formulas are C48H74O14 and C47H72O14, with molecular weights of 875.10 and 861.07, respectively. The structural formulas are: Component B1a, R = C2H5 Component B1b, R = CH3 Ivermectin is a white to yellowish-white, nonhygroscopic, crystalline powder with a melting point of about 155°C. It is insoluble in water but is freely soluble in methanol and soluble in 95% ethanol. STROMECTOL is available in 3-mg tablets containing the following inactive ingredients: microcrystalline cellulose, pregelatinized starch, magnesium stearate, butylated hydroxyanisole, and citric acid powder (anhydrous). CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Pharmacokinetics Following oral administration of ivermectin, plasma concentrations are approximately proportional to the dose. In two studies, after single 12-mg doses of STROMECTOL in fasting healthy volunteers (representing a mean dose of 165 mcg/kg), the mean peak plasma concentrations of the major component (H2B1a) were 46.6 (±21.9) (range: 16.4-101.1) and 30.6 (±15.6) (range: 13.9-68.4) ng/mL, respectively, at approximately 4 hours after dosing. Ivermectin is metabolized in the liver, and ivermectin and/or its metabolites are excreted almost exclusively in the feces over an estimated 12 days, with less than 1% of the administered dose excreted in the urine.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthelmintic Drugs-Used Against Invasion of Parasitic Worms (Helminthiasis) --Roundworms, Pinworms, Whipworms, Hookworms and Tapeworms Malaria
    Chapter 52 Introduction to Antiparasitic Drugs Targets of antiparasitic chemotherapy Unique essential enzymes found only in the parasite; Similar enzymes found in both host and parasite but indispensable only for the parasite; Common biochemical functions found in both parasite and host but with different pharmacologic properties. Classification of antiparasitic drugs • Antiprotozoal Drugs-used against invasion of single celled parasites --- used for treatment of malaria, amebiasis, giardiasis, toxoplasmosis and trichomoniasis • Anthelmintic Drugs-used against invasion of parasitic worms (Helminthiasis) --Roundworms, pinworms, whipworms, hookworms and tapeworms Malaria • Four species of plasmodium cause human malaria: – Plasmodium falciparum → responsible for nearly all serious complications and deaths. – P vivax – P malariae – P ovale •Transmitted by the Anopholes mosquito •Antimalarials act at different stages in life cycle Parasite life cycle Drug classification Tissue schizonticides: eliminate developing or dormant liver forms; Blood schizonticides : act on erythrocytic parasites; Gametocides : kill sexual stages and prevent transmission to mosquitoes. Radical cure: eliminate both hepatic and erythrocytic stages. Not available. Antimalarial drug---Chloroquine Antimalarial Action Highly effective blood schizonticide. Moderately effective against gametocytes of P vivax, P ovale, and P malariae but not against those of P falciparum. Not active against liver stage parasites. Mechanism of Action Remains controversial, probably acts
    [Show full text]