View of the Mandates and Achievements of Know, Business Questions Follow Shortly
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Living Former Members of the House of Commons
BRIEFING PAPER Number 05324, 7 January 2019 Living former Members Compiled by of the House of Sarah Priddy Commons Living former Members MPs are listed with any titles at the time they ceased to be an MP and the party they belonged to at the time. The list does not include MPs who now sit in the House of Lords. A list of members of the House of Lords who were Members of the House of Commons can be found on the Parliament website under House of Lords FAQs. Further information More detailed information on MPs who served between 1979 and 2010, including ministerial posts and party allegiance, covering their time in the UK Parliament and other legislatures, can be found in the Commons Library Briefing on Members 1979-2010. Association of Former Members of Parliament The PoliticsHome website has contact details for the Association of Former Members of Parliament. Parliament: facts and figures • Browse all briefings in the series This series of publications contains data on various subjects relating to Parliament and Government. Topics include legislation, MPs, select committees, debates, divisions and Parliamentary procedure. Feedback Any comments, corrections or suggestions for new lists should be sent to the Parliament and Constitution Centre. Suggestions for new lists welcomed. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Living former Members of the House of Commons Note: Does not include MPs who are now sit in the House of Lords Name Full Title Party* List Name Mr -
Submission to the Boundary Commission for England Second Period of Consultation: South East of England
Liberal Democrat submission for BCE 2nd consultation South East Submission to the Boundary Commission for England second period of consultation: South East of England 1) HAMPSHIRE Eastleigh / Hedge End & Hamble The official Conservative response stated that the party was in favour of bringing into Eastleigh Test Valley wards and a Southampton ward currently in the Romsey constituency because of the “good communication links”. However the Liberal Democrats would argue that, far from improving communication and community links, these proposals will make it harder for the MP to develop strong links with the three different local authorities’ council staff and councillors, threatening to reduce the effectiveness of the representation from the constituency’s MP. The proposals bring together communities that have very little in common (e.g. Swaything, Ampfield, Fair Oak) and divides some of them down the middle (West End), because ward boundaries can be arbitrary. Putting Swaything into Eastleigh is likely to result in lower turnout in this deprived area, because the community relates more strongly to Southampton. This happened when Woolston was added to Eastleigh in the 1980s. Splitting the parishes within the current Eastleigh constituency by cutting an arbitrary line right across a well established community of villages and parishes will provide a serious barrier to sensible and coherent representation of this community, pitting one half of a borough against another, and have the potential to de-stabilise the area. The results of the constituency opinion poll commissioned by Rt. Hon. Chris Huhne MP and submitted to the Boundary Commission resoundingly support this conclusion. The official Conservative submission also states: ““We support the composition of the proposed Hedge End and Hamble constituency which links together a number of communities with good communication links centred on Southampton Water and the River Hamble. -
February 2001
Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme The English Regions Quarterly Report February 2001 John Tomaney and Peter Hetherington The monitoring programme is funded by the ESRC Monitoring the English Regions Report No. 2 (February 2001) Research supported by the Economic and Social Research Council John Tomaney and Peter Hetherington Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies University of Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK Tel. +44(0)191 222 8016 Fax. +44 (0)191 232 9259 Web: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/curds Monitoring the English Regions: Report No 2 [February 2001] Key points..................................................................................................................2 1 Introduction: towards a Britain of nations and regions? ...................................3 2 Regional Structures...........................................................................................4 3 Regional politics and policies .........................................................................16 4 Media...............................................................................................................20 5 Public attitudes and identity ............................................................................21 6 Relations with Whitehall and Westminster.....................................................23 7 EU issues.........................................................................................................25 8 Local government............................................................................................25 -
LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION – the Widening Education Gap in Britain and How Where You Live Determines Your Chances
LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION – the widening education gap in Britain and how where you live determines your chances Contents Executive summary Top and worse 20 for degrees National rank no qualification National rank degree London Major UK cities Executive summary Where you live will determine your chances of educational success and people living in traditionally underachieving areas are proportionately less likely to have a degree now than they were at the last election. LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION – the widening education gap in Britain and how where you live determines your chances report from the University and College Union (UCU) analyses educational achievement by Westminster parliamentary constituency in England, Scotland and Wales and ranks each according to the percentage of people with at least some qualifications and the percentage of people with a degree or above. Research has shown that the cost to the UK economy of educational underachievement is over £18 billion a year*. This report shows how access to education is divided up, using national league tables and an analysis of 21 of our biggest cities. It shows that where you live is a key determinant of whether you will gain qualifications. The result is a country of stark contrasts – a true postcode lottery for education. To take one example, two out of three people (60%) living in Nick Clegg’s Sheffield Hallam constituency have a degree and only 3% have no qualifications at all. However, just down the road in David Blunkett’s Sheffield Brightside constituency almost a quarter of people (23%) have no qualifications and just 15% have a degree. -
Ministerial Departures Since 1997 Parliamentary Information List
Ministerial Departures since 1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04659 Last updated: 24th February 2009 Author: Department of Information Services The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Factsheets – the House of Commons Information Office Factsheets provide brief informative descriptions of various facets of the House of Commons. Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA. House of Commons Library Parliamentary Information Lists Date Minister Office held Department Replacement By date 10 December 1997 Mr Malcolm Chisholm Parliamentary Under-Secretary Scottish Office Mr Calum Macdonald of State 27 July 1998 Rt Hon Dr David Clark Minister of State (Chancellor Cabinet Office Rt Hon Dr Jack Cunningham of the Duchy of Lancaster) 27 July 1998 Rt Hon Frank Field Minister of -
Strategic Master Plans for Ports Paul Clark MP, Shipping Minister, Department for Transport, London UK
PORT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Strategic master plans for ports Paul Clark MP, Shipping Minister, Department for Transport, London UK For around five years airport operators have used strategic master Consulting with stakeholders plans as tools for aiding the growth and development of airports Consultation with stakeholders is an essential part of the process, across the UK. The master plan process has helped them set out and helps to ensure that plans are comprehensive, deliverable and their development proposals; inform planners and communities sustainable. about their future objectives; and engage with local and regional In particular early consultation with local planning authorities stakeholders. and transport infrastructure developers can be an effective Now the Department for Transport wants to replicate that way to support the successful delivery of future development success in the ports sector, so in December of last year we plans. For planning authorities, early engagement means that published guidance recommending that all major UK ports port expansion plans can be included in the relevant planning should produce master plans in consultation with their key documents, while for transport infrastructure developers, early stakeholders, and advising on how they might best achieve this. consultation provides more time and space to consider the port’s future infrastructure requirements. What are the main priorities for port master Being open and transparent about future plans and engaging plans? with local community groups, employees and port users will help First and foremost, each master plan should present a port’s broad to improve local working relationships and raise the profile of the strategic intentions over the medium to long term.