Hearing National Defense Authorization Act For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hearing National Defense Authorization Act For i [H.A.S.C. No. 112–100] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FULL COMMITTEE HEARING ON BUDGET REQUEST FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEARING HELD FEBRUARY 15, 2012 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–426 WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, California, Chairman ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland ADAM SMITH, Washington MAC THORNBERRY, Texas SILVESTRE REYES, Texas WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina LORETTA SANCHEZ, California W. TODD AKIN, Missouri MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania JEFF MILLER, Florida ROBERT ANDREWS, New Jersey JOE WILSON, South Carolina SUSAN A. DAVIS, California FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio RICK LARSEN, Washington JOHN KLINE, Minnesota JIM COOPER, Tennessee MIKE ROGERS, Alabama MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam TRENT FRANKS, Arizona JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania DAVE LOEBSACK, Iowa K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado CHELLIE PINGREE, Maine ROB WITTMAN, Virginia LARRY KISSELL, North Carolina DUNCAN HUNTER, California MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico JOHN C. FLEMING, M.D., Louisiana BILL OWENS, New York MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado JOHN R. GARAMENDI, California TOM ROONEY, Florida MARK S. CRITZ, Pennsylvania TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania TIM RYAN, Ohio SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia C.A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland CHRIS GIBSON, New York HANK JOHNSON, Georgia VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri BETTY SUTTON, Ohio JOE HECK, Nevada COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii BOBBY SCHILLING, Illinois KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL, New York JON RUNYAN, New Jersey AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia TIM GRIFFIN, Arkansas STEVEN PALAZZO, Mississippi ALLEN B. WEST, Florida MARTHA ROBY, Alabama MO BROOKS, Alabama TODD YOUNG, Indiana ROBERT L. SIMMONS II, Staff Director JENNESS SIMLER, Professional Staff Member MICHAEL CASEY, Professional Staff Member LAUREN HAUHN, Research Assistant (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2012 Page HEARING: Wednesday, February 15, 2012, Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authoriza- tion Budget Request from the Department of Defense ..................................... 1 APPENDIX: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 .............................................................................. 59 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2012 FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS McKeon, Hon. Howard P. ‘‘Buck,’’ a Representative from California, Chair- man, Committee on Armed Services .................................................................. 1 Smith, Hon. Adam, a Representative from Washington, Ranking Member, Committee on Armed Services ............................................................................ 2 WITNESSES Dempsey, GEN Martin E., USA, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff ...................... 11 Panetta, Hon. Leon E., Secretary of Defense ........................................................ 5 APPENDIX PREPARED STATEMENTS: Dempsey, GEN Martin E. ................................................................................ 76 McKeon, Hon. Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ .................................................................... 63 Panetta, Hon. Leon E. ...................................................................................... 66 Smith, Hon. Adam ............................................................................................ 65 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD: Letter to Chairman McKeon from Secretary Panetta, Dated November 2, 2011 (Submitted by Mr. Turner) ............................................................. 91 Letter to Secretary Panetta from Chairman McKeon and Mr. Turner, Dated September 13, 2011 (Submitted by Mr. Turner) ............................. 89 Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy (Submitted by Mr. Turner) ............................. 92 WITNESS RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS ASKED DURING THE HEARING: Mr. Bartlett ....................................................................................................... 99 Ms. Bordallo ...................................................................................................... 100 Mr. Hunter ........................................................................................................ 101 Mr. Johnson ...................................................................................................... 101 Mr. Kline ........................................................................................................... 100 Mr. Turner ........................................................................................................ 99 Mr. Wilson ......................................................................................................... 99 Mr. Wittman ..................................................................................................... 101 (III) IV Page QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS POST HEARING: Ms. Bordallo ...................................................................................................... 107 Mr. Conaway ..................................................................................................... 116 Mr. Heinrich ..................................................................................................... 120 Mr. Langevin ..................................................................................................... 106 Mr. Loebsack ..................................................................................................... 115 Mr. Owens ......................................................................................................... 121 Mrs. Roby .......................................................................................................... 126 Mr. Ruppersberger ........................................................................................... 122 Mr. Schilling ..................................................................................................... 124 Mr. Scott ............................................................................................................ 126 Mr. Smith .......................................................................................................... 105 Mr. Turner ........................................................................................................ 107 Mr. Wilson ......................................................................................................... 105 Mr. Wittman ..................................................................................................... 118 FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZA- TION BUDGET REQUEST FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC, Wednesday, February 15, 2012. The committee met, pursuant to call, at 10:05 a.m. in room 2118, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon (chairman of the committee) presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, A REPRESENTATIVE FROM CALIFORNIA, CHAIRMAN, COM- MITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES The CHAIRMAN. The hearing will come to order. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining us today as we consider the President’s fiscal year 2013 budget re- quest for the Department of Defense. To put this budget in context, it is critical to examine the strategy that has informed its submis- sion. At the outset, I want our witnesses to know that I appreciate the hard work that went into the development of the strategy. It is no small effort to completely revise a strategy 1 year after the submis- sion of the Quadrennial Defense Review and less than 3 months after the submission of a budget request. However, I do have serious concerns about the trajectory that this new strategy puts us on. Although this strategy is framed as making the military more nimble and flexible, it is not clear how slashing the Armed Forces by over 100,000 during a time of war, shedding force structure and postponing the modernization makes that so. The President must understand that the world has always had and will always have a leader. As America steps back, someone else will step forward. We have now heard multiple times that the strategy drove the budget and not the other way around. I suppose this starts with the President’s call to slash at least $400 billion from defense last April in advance of any strategic review. An honest and valid strat- egy for national defense can’t be founded on the premise that we must do more with less or even less with less. Rather, you proceed from a clear articulation of the full scope of the threats you face and the commitments you have. You then resource the strategy re- quired to defeat those threats decisively. One does not mask insuf- ficient resources with a strategy founded on hope. Furthermore, the President’s new defense strategy ‘‘supports the national security imperative of deficit reduction through a lower level
Recommended publications
  • Setting Course: a Congressional Management Guide
    SETTING COURSE SETTING “The best thing a new Member and his or her staff can do is to sit down and read Setting Course cover to cover. It’s a book that has stood the test of time.” —House Chief of Staff SETTING “Setting Course is written as if you were having a conversation with someone who has been on Capitol Hill for 50 years and knows how things work.” —Senate Office Manager COURSE SETTING COURSE, now in its 17th edition for the 117th Congress, is a comprehensive guide to managing a congressional office. Part I is for Members-elect and freshman offices, focusing on the tasks that are most critical to a successful transition to Congress and setting up a new office. Part II focuses on defining the Member’s role — in the office and in Congress. Part III provides guidance to both freshman and veteran Members and staff on managing office operations. Setting Course is the signature publication of the Congressional Management Foundation MANAGEMENT GUIDE CONGRESSIONAL A and has been funded by grants from: Deborah Szekely A CONGRESSIONAL MANAGEMENT GUIDE THE CONGRESSIONAL MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION (CMF) is a 501(c)(3) nonpartisan nonprofit whose mission is to build EDITION FOR THE trust and effectiveness in Congress. We do this by enhancing the 117th performance of the institution, legislators and their staffs through CONGRESS research-based education and training, and by strengthening the CONGRESS bridge between Congress and the People it serves. Since 1977 CMF 117th has worked internally with Member, committee, leadership, and institutional offices in the House and Senate to identify and disseminate best practices for management, workplace environment, SPONSORED BY communications, and constituent services.
    [Show full text]
  • Ag Districts Get Focus in Battle for Congress
    April 15, 2020 Volume 16, Number 15 Ag districts get focus in battle for Congress If Republicans have any hope of winning control of the U.S. House this fall, they’ll have to start by winning a series of major agricultural districts Democrats won in 2018. Of the top 100 House districts in terms of farm production, seven are rated as toss-ups by the Cook Political Report. Six of the seven are held by Democrats, including House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson's 7th District seat in Minnesota. The influential chairmanship is held in high regard - a title he could retain unless the House flips back to Republican. The lone Republican tossup seat belongs to Rep. Rodney Davis, whose 13th District in central Illinois includes the university towns of Champaign and Urbana as well as swath of one of the nation’s most productive corn and soybean-growing regions. Three of the tossup ag seats are next door in Iowa, including seats that first-term Reps. Cindy Axne and Abby Finkenauer won in 2018 by ousting GOP incumbents. The third Iowa seat is being vacated by Democratic Rep. Dave Loebsack. The two other tossup seats are in California and New Mexico. In California’s 21st District, which ranks fourth nationally in farm revenue according to the latest Agriculture Department census, first-term Rep. TJ Cox faces a rematch with Republican David Valadao, whom Cox ousted in 2018. www.Agri-Pulse.com 1 In New Mexico’s 2nd District, which covers the southern half of the state, first-term Democratic Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of the 2012 Election,” the Pre-Edit Version of Chapter 9 in Michael Nelson (Ed.), The
    “The Meaning of the 2012 Election,” the pre-edit version of Chapter 9 in Michael Nelson (ed.), The Elections of 2012 (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2013) David R. Mayhew The nation’s fifty-seventh presidential election has come and gone. What are we to make of it? I address the shape of the election, the political context surrounding it and brought by it, and the policy implications of it. Election patterns for the House and Senate as well as the presidency are taken up. The General Shape of the Election: Incumbency Prevails Overwhelmingly, this was a personal incumbency election. Possibly it set a new standard in that respect. Across all the elective institutions, if you held an office and ran for it again you were exceedingly likely to keep it. It was like a Wall Street firm at Christmas. There were bonuses for virtually everybody. There was little “edge” to the 2012 election. It was not driven by background forces like the Iraq war in the midterm of 2006,1 the Wall Street crash (and Iraq, still) in the contest of 2008,2 or a blowback against unpopular legislative enactments, notably ObamaCare, in the midterm of 2010.3 (The term “ObamaCare” started out as invidious, but the president has warmed to it himself, and it has a pleasing snappiness, so I use it here.)4 Those three elections had “edge.” But in 2012 the voters seemed to recede into a stance of default, exhausted perhaps, for one thing, by the 1 Gary C. Jacobson, “Referendum: The 2006 Midterm Congressional Elections,” Political Science Quarterly 122 (Spring 2007), 1-24.
    [Show full text]
  • GBA Strategies
    To: Interested Parties From: GBA Strategies Date: September 28, 2012 Bustos Surging in IL-17 Democrat Cheri Bustos is surging in her race against incumbent Republican Congressman Bobby Schilling in Illinois’ new 17th congressional district. A new survey1 of 600 likely voters shows Bustos has closed the gap dramatically since advertising in the campaign began, pulling to within 45 – 47 percent—well within the survey’s margin of error. In a vote simulation where undecided voters are allocated by their partisanship, Bustos and Schilling are completely tied 49 - 49 percent. Last month, before Bustos introduced herself in television commercials, Congressman Schilling released a poll indicating he held a 13-point, 50 – 37 percent2 lead. Earlier this year, our poll also observed the better-known Schilling holding an early 10-point lead3. That advantage is now effectively gone, as voters are finding out more about both candidates. In August, Schilling’s campaign said that Bustos was “quickly running out of time” to change the race. But the race is changing—quickly. Not only has Bustos moved to within the margin of error against Schilling, but the environment favors Democrats in the 17th. President Obama leads Governor Mitt Romney by a wide 54 – 41 percent margin in this race. Despite a wave of negative ads from Schilling and Washington Republicans that the Quad-City Times called “reckless, irresponsible fiction,” this race is moving in Bustos’ direction and with less than 6 weeks remaining she has the clear momentum. 1 Survey of 600 likely voters conducted by GBA Strategies September 24-26, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Pictorial Directory.Indb I 5/16/11 10:19 AM Compiled Under the Direction of the Joint Committee on Printing Gregg Harper, Chairman
    S. Prt. 112-1 One Hundred Twelfth Congress Congressional Pictorial Directory 2011 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 2011 congressional pictorial directory.indb I 5/16/11 10:19 AM Compiled Under the Direction of the Joint Committee on Printing Gregg Harper, Chairman For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Offi ce Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800; Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 978-0-16-087912-8 online version: www.fdsys.gov congressional pictorial directory.indb II 5/16/11 10:19 AM Contents Photographs of: Page President Barack H. Obama ................... V Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. .............VII Speaker of the House John A. Boehner ......... IX President pro tempore of the Senate Daniel K. Inouye .......................... XI Photographs of: Senate and House Leadership ............XII-XIII Senate Officers and Officials ............. XIV-XVI House Officers and Officials ............XVII-XVIII Capitol Officials ........................... XIX Members (by State/District no.) ............ 1-152 Delegates and Resident Commissioner .... 153-154 State Delegations ........................ 155-177 Party Division ............................... 178 Alphabetical lists of: Senators ............................. 181-184 Representatives ....................... 185-197 Delegates and Resident Commissioner ........ 198 Closing date for compilation of the Pictorial Directory was March 4, 2011. * House terms not consecutive. † Also served previous Senate terms. †† Four-year term, elected 2008. congressional pictorial directory.indb III 5/16/11 10:19 AM congressional pictorial directory.indb IV 5/16/11 10:19 AM Barack H. Obama President of the United States congressional pictorial directory.indb V 5/16/11 10:20 AM congressional pictorial directory.indb VI 5/16/11 10:20 AM Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida 26: Can Local Politics Trump Partisanship? 2020 House Ratings
    This issue brought to you by 2020 House Ratings Toss-Up (2R, 4D) GA 7 (Open; Woodall, R) NY 11 (Rose, D) IA 3 (Axne, D) OK 5 (Horn, D) IL 13 (Davis, R) SC 1 (Cunningham, D) Tilt Democratic (10D, 1R) Tilt Republican (6R) JUNE 5, 2020 VOLUME 4, NO. 11 CA 21 (Cox, D) MN 1 (Hagedorn, R) CA 25 (Garcia, R) NJ 2 (Van Drew, R) GA 6 (McBath, D) PA 1 (Fitzpatrck, R) Florida 26: Can Local Politics IA 1 (Finkenauer, D) PA 10 (Perry, R) IA 2 (Open; Loebsack, D) TX 22 (Open; Olson, R) Trump Partisanship? ME 2 (Golden, D) TX 24 (Open; Marchant, R) MN 7 (Peterson, DFL) By Jacob Rubashkin NM 2 (Torres Small, D) NY 22 (Brindisi, D) GOP DEM Republicans are putting Tip O’Neill’s “All politics is local” to the UT 4 (McAdams, D) 116th Congress 201 233 ultimate test in Florida. GOP strategists generally believe that their VA 7 (Spanberger, D) Currently Solid 174 202 path back to the House majority lies in districts carried or narrowly lost Competitive 27 31 by President Donald Trump in 2016. Florida’s 26th is not one of those districts; it voted for Hillary Clinton by 16 points. Needed for majority 218 But this South Florida constituency, created after the 2010 redistricting cycle, offers some hope to the GOP. It’s shown a willingness to vote Lean Democratic (8D, 1R) Lean Republican (6R, 1L) for Republicans down ballot, and the national party was able to land a CA 48 (Rouda, D) MI 3 (Open; Amash, L) top-tier recruit to take on freshman Democrat Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, IL 14 (Underwood, D) MO 2 (Wagner, R) something Republicans have struggled to do in some more competitive KS 3 (Davids, D) NE 2 (Bacon, R) districts nationwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomson Prison Sale Hits Another Snag
    Illinois prison sale hits another snag - Chicago Tribune http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-07-04/news/ct-met-quinn-congres... Front Page News Sports Business Entertainment Opinion Lifestyle 12 Home > Featured Articles Illinois prison sale hits another snag July 04, 2012 | By Rick Pearson, Chicago Tribune reporter Recommend 0 Tweet 0 0 The state's effort to sell a northwestern Illinois prison to the federal government, stalled in Washington for years over fears that Guantanamo Bay terrorism detainees would be transferred stateside, is now caught up in a squabble among congressional Republicans. The latest wrinkle in the Thomson prison sale to generate millions for a cash-starved state government came late last week. Ten of the state's Republican congressmen wrote to Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, asking him to lower the price to try to win support from a balking and powerful House GOP colleague. Quinn's office and home-state President Barack Obama's administration already have agreed on a $165 million price, below the $220 million that the little-used prison was appraised at but $25 million more than it cost to build in 2001. The fate of Thomson and the promise of more than 1,000 jobs in northwestern Illinois involve Rep. Bobby Schilling of Colona, a freshman tea party Republican in a targeted contest who desperately wants the sale of the little-used prison to go through as he seeks re-election. It also involves Rep. Rep. Frank Wolf of Virginia, a powerful veteran Republican who chairs a House subcommittee that oversees prison spending. Wolf opposes the prison purchase because of fears that the Obama White House wants to move detainees there from Cuba despite a law against it and assurances by administration officials.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE HOUSE Lydia Beyoud, Cheryl Bolen, Heather Caygle, Kenneth P
    Staff and Credits TABLE of CONTENTS Obama Elected to a Second Term, Facing Fiscal Cliff and Nation Divided 2 PAUL ALBERGO Status Quo House Election Outcomes Seen Unlikely to Result in Big Changes 4 Managing Editor, Daily Report for Executives Democrats Expand Majority Status but Contentiousness Looms in January 5 CHERYL SAENZ, MICHAEL R. TRIPLETT Membership Changes to the 113th 8 Assistant Managing Editors, Daily Report for Executives 113th Congress by the Numbers 52 REPORTERS Alexei Alexis, Paul Barbagallo, Alison Bennett, SENATE HOUSE Lydia Beyoud, Cheryl Bolen, Heather Caygle, Kenneth P. Doyle, Brett Ferguson, Diane Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry 12 Admininistration 31 Freda, Lynn Garner, Diana I. Gregg, Marc Appropriations 13 Agriculture 32 Heller, Aaron E. Lorenzo, Jonathan Nicholson, Nancy Ognanovich, Heather M. Rothman, Armed Services 15 Appropriations 33 Denise Ryan, Robert T. Zung Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs 16 Armed Services 35 EDITORS Budget 18 Budget 36 Sean Barry, Theresa A. Barry, Jane Bowling, Sue Doyle, Kathie Felix, Steve France, Commerce, Science & Transportation 18 Education & the Workforce 37 Dave Harrison, John Kirkland, Vandana Energy & Natural Resources 20 Energy & Commerce 38 Mathur, Ellen McCleskey, Isabella Perelman, Karen Saunders Environment & Public Works 22 Ethics 40 CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Ethics 23 Financial Services 41 Susan Raleigh Jenkins, Jeff Kinney, Susan J. McGolrick, John Sullivan, Joe Tinkelman Finance 26 Foreign Affairs 43 MIKE WRIGHT Foreign Relations 25 Homeland Security 44 Production Control
    [Show full text]
  • CQR Tea Party Movement
    Res earc her Published by CQ Press, a Division of SAGE CQ www.cqresearcher.com Tea Party Movement Will angry conservatives reshape the Republican Party? he Tea Party movement seemed to come out of nowhere. Suddenly, citizens angry over the multi- billion-dollar economic stimulus and the Obama ad - T ministration’s health-care plan were leading rallies, confronting lawmakers and holding forth on radio and TV. Closely tied to the Republican Party — though also critical of the GOP — the movement proved essential to the surprise victory of Republi - can Sen. Scott Brown in Massachusetts. Tea partiers say Brown’s Tea kettle held high, a Tea Party activist dressed like a election proves the movement runs strong outside of “red states.” Revolutionary War soldier rallies tax protesters in Atlanta on April 15, 2009. It was among several But some political experts voice skepticism, arguing that the Tea protests held in cities around the nation. Party’s fiscal hawkishness won’t appeal to most Democrats and many independents. Meanwhile, some dissension has appeared among tea partiers, with many preferring to sidestep social issues, I such as immigration, and others emphasizing them. Still, the move - N THIS REPORT ment exerts strong appeal for citizens fearful of growing govern - S THE ISSUES ....................243 I ment debt and distrustful of the administration. BACKGROUND ................249 D CHRONOLOGY ................251 E CURRENT SITUATION ........256 CQ Researcher • March 19, 2010 • www.cqresearcher.com AT ISSUE ........................257 Volume 20, Number 11 • Pages 241-264 OUTLOOK ......................259 RECIPIENT OF SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE N AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SILVER GAVEL AWARD BIBLIOGRAPHY ................262 THE NEXT STEP ..............263 TEA PARTY MOVEMENT CQ Re search er March 19, 2010 THE ISSUES SIDEBARS AND GRAPHICS Volume 20, Number 11 • Does the Tea Party rep - Tea Partiers Running in MANAGING EDITOR: Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Friday, April 18, 2014 12:45 P.M., Peralta Oaks Board Room the Following Agenda Items Are Listed for Committee Consideration
    AGENDA BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Friday, April 18, 2014 12:45 p.m., Peralta Oaks Board Room The following agenda items are listed for Committee consideration. In accordance with the Board Operating Guidelines, no official action of the Board will be taken at this meeting; rather, the Committee’s purpose shall be to review the listed items and to consider developing recommendations to the Board of Directors. AGENDA STATUS TIME ITEM STAFF 12:45 p.m. 1. STATE LEGISLATION / ISSUES (R) A. NEW LEGISLATION Doyle/Pfuehler Plan Amendment 1. AB 1193 (Ting D-San Francisco) – New Class IV Bikeway Designation 2. AB 2193 (Gordon D-Menlo Park) – Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Act 3. ACR 96 (Olsen R-Merced) – The 150th Anniversary of the California State Park System (R) B. ISSUES Doyle/Pfuehler 1. Drought Relief 2. SB 1183 (DeSaulnier D-Concord) – Local Bike Infrastructure Enhancement Act of 2014 3. SB 1086 (de Leon D-Los Angeles) – Park Bond effort Doyle/Pfuehler (R) II. FEDERAL LEGISLATION / ISSUES A. NEW LEGISLATION 1. S. 2016 (Feinstein) and H.R. 4239 (Huffman) – Western States Emergency Drought Relief Act 2. H.R. 956 (Kind D-WI) – Personal Health Investment Today (PHIT) Act of 2013 (R) B. ISSUES Doyle/Pfuehler 1. Land and Water Conservation Fund Competitive Grant Program 2. Outdoors Alliance for Kids 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy Communities Program 4. Department of Labor 21st Century Conservation Service Corps 5. Child and Adult Care Food Program III. DISCUSSION ABOUT LOCAL BALLOT MEASURES IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS VI. ARTICLES (R) Recommendation for Future Board Consideration (I) Information Future 2014 Meetings: (D) Discussion May 16, 2014 August 15, 2014 November 21, 2014 Legislative Committee Members: June 20, 2014 September 19, 2014 December 19, 2014 Doug Siden, Chair, Ted Radke, John Sutter, July 18, 2014 October 24, 2014 Whitney Dotson, Alternate Erich Pfuehler, Staff Coordinator TO: Board Legislative Committee (Chair Doug Siden, Ted Radke, John Sutter and Alternate Whitney Dotson) FROM: Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • It's Time to Name the Tea Party Politicians
    1109Lowdown_Final.qxd:1109Lowdown 1/9/11 11:00 AM Page 1 VOLUME13 NUMBER 9 SEPTEMBER 2011 The ❛❛Buckets of crazy. ❜❜ ——A REPUBLICAN STAFFER in the House, candidly describing tea party lawmakers pushing LOWDOWN a ridiculously destructive debt ceiling bill. EDITED BY JIM HIGHTOWER AND PHILLIP FRAZER In just one year, the tea party went from hating billionaires to fronting for them It’s time to name the tea party politicians (and their sponsors)—and call them out AS HE KEEPS DEMONSTRATING, President Obama is not dard. “Everyone supported it,” says a top executive of bulb-maker exactly Mount Rushmore material. But—good God!—the Philips. So did Edison’s descendents, who issued a simple state- ment that old Tom himself could’ve written: “Technology changes. petulant pettiness and corporate servility of Congress’ tea Embrace it.” party Republicans makes Obama’s timidity seem like a Plus, the new law shows that government rule-making can work chapter from Profiles In Courage. beautifully, producing a major surge in industry innovation. In only four years, Philips, GE, and Sylvania have already developed incan- merica has BIG needs right now—a jobs crisis, housing crisis, descent bulbs that meet the government’s higher efficiency stan- infrastructure crisis, energy crisis, climate crisis, middle-class dard and save money for consumers. crisis, democracy crisis. But they can’t even be addressed Nonetheless, such dim bulbs as Michele Bachmann, along with because tea party ravers in the House, joined there by a gag- the tea party caucus, joined the Kochs’ silly circus. They merrily rolled A gle of old school right-wingers, keep throwing hissy fits over the bizarre anti-efficiency light bulb bill right through the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Martha Roby, R Mo Brooks, R Terri A. Sewell, D Election: Defeated Rep
    THE FRESHMEN House Members ALABAMA (2) ALABAMA (5) ALABAMA (7) Martha Roby, R Mo Brooks, R Terri A. Sewell, D Election: Defeated Rep. Bobby Bright, D Election: Defeated Steve Raby, D, after defeating Pronounced: SUE-ell Residence: Montgomery Rep. Parker Griffith in the primary Election: Defeated Don Chamberlain, R, to Born: July 26, 1976; Montgomery, Ala. Residence: Huntsville succeed Artur Davis, D, who ran for governor Religion: Presbyterian Born: April 29, 1954; Charleston, S.C. Residence: Birmingham Family: Husband, Riley Roby; two children Religion: Christian Born: Jan. 1, 1965; Huntsville, Ala. Education: New York U., B.M. 1998 (music, busi- Family: Wife, Martha Brooks; four children Religion: Christian ness and technology); Samford U., J.D. 2001 Education: Duke U., B.A. 1975 (economics & Family: Single Career: Lawyer political science); U. of Alabama, J.D. 1978 Education: Princeton U., A.B. 1986 (Woodrow Political highlights: Montgomery City Council, Career: Special assistant state attorney general; Wilson School); Oxford U., M.A. 1988 (politics; 2004-present lawyer; county prosecutor Marshall Scholar); Harvard, J.D. 1992 Political highlights: Ala. House, 1983-91; Madi- Career: Lawyer son Co. district attorney, 1991-93; Madison Co. Political highlights: No previous office Commission, 1996-present; sought Republican nomination for lieutenant governor, 2006 ike others who rooks’ top priority ewell becomes Lsought congressio- Bis a constitutional Sthe first African- nal seats this year, Roby amendment requiring a American woman from is most concerned about balanced budget. “The Alabama to serve in Con- improving the job situ- most significant national gress and the first Ala- ation in her district. But security threat America bama woman of any race she also wants to weed faces are these unsustain- to be elected, rather than out “waste and inefficien- able budget deficits,” he appointed, to serve a full cy” in Washington.
    [Show full text]