DOCSLIB.ORG

Declarations of Interest Thorax: First Published As 10.1136/Thoraxjnl-2016-209333.467 on 15 November 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Declarations of Interest Thorax: First Published As 10.1136/Thoraxjnl-2016-209333.467 on 15 November 2016 Declarations of interest Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.467 on 15 November 2016. Downloaded from P55 BENEFITS OF TIOTROPIUM/OLODATEROL ON B Make has received honoraria for participation in NOVELTY SYMPTOMS AND HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN planning meeting, and has received grant funding, participated in PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE COPD WITH advisory boards and provided non-branded talk for AstraZeneca. CHRONIC BRONCHITIS AND/OR EMPHYSEMA He has received honoraria for participation in medical advisory boards for Aerocrine, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Bering, GlaxoS- 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.467 mithKline, Forest, Novartis, Spiration, Theravance, and Suno- vion. He has participated in research studies funded by Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Forest, Sunovian. GT Ferguson, during the conduct of the study, reports grants, RJ Martin has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingel- Teva, Genentech, Boeringer Ingelheim, and PMD. His institution heim and, outside the submitted work, grants, personal fees and has received grants from NHLBI (AsthmaNet) and MedImmune. non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees He has also received travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from GlaxoSmithKline, grants and personal fees from Novartis, from the Respiratory Effectiveness Group. AstraZeneca, Pearl Therapeutics and Sunovion, and grants from I Pavord has received speaker’s honoraria for speaking at Forest. sponsored meetings from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, R Abrahams reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Aerocrine, Almirall, Novartis, and GSK and a payment for organ- Ingelheim during the conduct of the study and, outside of this ising an educational event from AZ. He has received honoraria work, grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline and grants for attending advisory panels with Almirall, Genentech, Regen- from AstraZeneca and Pearl Therapeutics. eron, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Schering- L Bjermer reports no conflicts of interest. Plough, Novartis, Dey, Napp and Respivert. He has received L Grönke and F Voß are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim sponsorship to attend international scientific meetings from Pharma GmbH & Co. KG. Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Astra Zeneca and Napp. D Singh reports other financial activities from Boehringer D Price has board membership with Aerocrine, Almirall, Ingelheim during the conduct of the study and, outside of the Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Meda, Mun- submitted work, grants and personal fees from Almirall, AstraZe- dipharma, Napp, Novartis, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; consul- neca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, tancy with Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, NAPP, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Meda, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis, Teva, Theravance and Verona, and personal fees from Genentech Pfizer, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; grants and unrestricted funding and SkyePharma. for investigator-initiated studies (conducted through Research in Real-Life Ltd and Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd) from UK National Health Service, British Lung Founda- P138 AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO STUDY DESIGN: USING tion, Aerocrine, AKL Ltd, Almirall, AstraZeneca, Boehringer ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS TO INFORM THE Ingelheim, Chiesi, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Meda, Merck, FEASIBILITY AND DESIGN OF THE NOVELTY STUDY (A Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, Respiratory Effec- NOVEL OBSERVATIONAL LONGITUDINAL STUDY ON tiveness Group, Takeda, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Zentiva; pay- PATIENTS WITH ASTHMA AND/OR COPD) ments for lectures/speaking from Almirall, AstraZeneca, http://thorax.bmj.com/ Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin, 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.468 Meda, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Skyepharma, Takeda, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; payment for manuscript prep- The NOVELTY study is supported by AstraZeneca. aration from Mundipharma and Teva Pharmaceuticals; patents M Gerhardsson de Verdier, C Keen, A Gardev, S Rennard, A (planned, pending or issued) from AKL Ltd; payment for the Sveréus, L Brannman, N Karlson, J Nuevo, F Nyberg and S development of educational materials from GlaxoSmithKline and Young are employees of AstraZeneca. Novartis; stock/stock options from AKL Ltd which produces phy- HK Reddel has participated in advisory boards for AstraZe- topharmaceuticals; owns 80% of Research in Real Life Ltd, 75% on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. neca, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, a data safety monitoring of the social enterprise Optimum Patient Care Ltd and 75% of board for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and Novartis, Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd; received has provided independent educational presentations for AstraZe- payment for travel/accommodations/meeting expenses from neca, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma Aerocrine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis, and Teva, and has received independent research funding from and Teva Pharmaceuticals; funding for patient enrolment or com- AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. pletion of research from Almirall, Chiesi, Teva Pharmaceuticals, R Beasley has received research funding from Astra Zeneca, and Zentiva; and peer reviewer for grant committees of the Med- Genentech, Cephalon, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Sanofi, ical Research Council (2014), Efficacy and Mechanism Evalua- and has received payments for lectures and/or participation in tion programme (2012), HTA (2014). advisory boards from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline and AT Bansal is a paid consultant of AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithK- Novartis. line, hVivo and Roche. EH Bel received research grants from Roche, AstraZeneca, J Vestbo has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boeh- GlaxoSmithKline, and honoraria for research consulting from ringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi/Regeneron. advising and presenting. C Janson has no disclosures to declare. Thorax 2016;71(Suppl 3):A1–A288 A271.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Corporate Governance
    Strategic report Governance and remuneration Financial statements Investor information Corporate Governance In this section Chairman’s Governance statement 78 The Board 80 Corporate Executive Team 83 Board architecture 85 Board roles and responsibilities 86 Board activity and principal decisions 87 Our purpose, values and culture 90 The Board’s approach to engagement 91 Board performance 94 Board Committee information 96 Our Board Committee reports 97 Section 172 statement 108 Directors’ report 109 GSK Annual Report 2020 77 Chairman’s Governance statement In last year’s Governance statement, I explained that our primary Education and focus on Science objective for 2020 was to ensure there was clarity between the Given the critical importance of strengthening the pipeline, Board and management on GSK’s execution of strategy and its the Board has benefitted from devoting a higher proportion of operational priorities. We have aligned our long-term priorities its time in understanding the science behind our strategy and of Innovation, Performance and Trust powered by culture testing its application. It is important that the Board has a and agreed on the metrics to measure delivery against them. working understanding of the key strategic themes upon The Board’s annual cycle of meetings ensures that all major which our R&D strategy is based. These themes have been components of our strategy are reviewed over the course complemented by Board R&D science thematic deep dives. of the year. Our focus was on the fundamentals of our strategy: human The COVID-19 pandemic impacted and dominated all our genetics, the immune system and AI and ML, as well as to lives for the majority of 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District Of
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FOREST LABORATORIES, LLC and ) FOREST LABORATORIES ) HOLDINGS, LTD., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civ.No.14-1119-SLR ) SIGMAPHARM LABORATORIES, LLC, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esquire and Maryellen Noreika, Esquire of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, Delaware. Counsel for Plaintiffs. Of Counsel: Howard W. Levine, Esquire, Sanya Sukduang, Esquire, Jonathan R. Davies, Esquire, Courtney B. Gasp, Esquire, and Charles E. Lipsey, Esquire of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP. John C. Phillips, Esquire, David A. Bilson, Esquire and Megan C. Haney of Phillips, Goldman, Mclaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware. Counsel for Defendant Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC. Of Counsel: Anthony G. Simon, Esquire, Anthony R. Friedman, Esquire, Benjamin R. Askew, Esquire, and Michael P. Kella, Esquire of The Simon Law Firm, P.C. Karen Elizabeth Keller, Esquire and Jeffrey Thomas Castellano, Esquire of Shaw Keller, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware. Counsel for Defendants Hikma Pharmaceuticals LLC, Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC, and West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp. Of Counsel: lmron T. Aly, Esquire, Joel M. Wallace, Esquire, and Helen H. Ji, Esquire of Schiff Hardin LLP. Richard D. Kirk, Esquire, Stephen B. Brauerman, Esquire and Sara E. Bussiere, Esquire of Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware. Counsel for Defendant Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. Of Counsel: Beth D. Jacob, Esquire, Clifford Katz, Esquire, and Malavika A. Rao, Esquire of Kelley, Drye & Warren LLP. Karen Pascale, Esquire and Pilar G. Kraman, Esquire of Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware. Counsel for Defendants Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Alembic Global Holding SA and Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Of Counsel: Steven J. Lee, Esquire, Michael K.
    [Show full text]
  • PEDIARIX Is a Vaccine
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • If Guillain-Barré syndrome occurs within 6 weeks of receipt of a prior These highlights do not include all the information needed to use vaccine containing tetanus toxoid, the decision to give PEDIARIX should PEDIARIX safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for be based on potential benefits and risks. (5.2) PEDIARIX. • The tip caps of the prefilled syringes contain natural rubber latex which may cause allergic reactions. (5.3) PEDIARIX [Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis • Syncope (fainting) can occur in association with administration of Adsorbed, Hepatitis B (Recombinant) and Inactivated Poliovirus injectable vaccines, including PEDIARIX. Procedures should be in place Vaccine], Suspension for Intramuscular Injection to avoid falling injury and to restore cerebral perfusion following Initial U.S. Approval: 2002 syncope. (5.4) • If temperature ≥105°F, collapse or shock-like state, or persistent, ----------------------------- INDICATIONS AND USAGE ---------------------------- PEDIARIX is a vaccine indicated for active immunization against diphtheria, inconsolable crying lasting ≥3 hours have occurred within 48 hours after tetanus, pertussis, infection caused by all known subtypes of hepatitis B virus, receipt of a pertussis-containing vaccine, or if seizures have occurred and poliomyelitis. PEDIARIX is approved for use as a 3-dose series in infants within 3 days after receipt of a pertussis-containing vaccine, the decision born of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative mothers. PEDIARIX to give PEDIARIX should be based on potential benefits and risks. (5.5) may be given as early as 6 weeks of age through 6 years of age (prior to the • For children at higher risk for seizures, an antipyretic may be 7th birthday).
    [Show full text]
  • A Forum Report on Continuous Manufacturing for Biologics
    A Forum Report on Continuous Manufacturing for Biologics CMC Strategy Forum Jan 28, 2019 in Washington , DC Andrew Chang, Ph.D. Vice President, Quality and Regulatory Compliance, Novo Nordisk Quality Novo Nordisk A/S Agenda 1 Overview the Forum Program 2 Key Learnings: Small Molecules vs. Biologics 3 Panel Discussion Outcome Opportunities and Challenges Central Questions Raised for planning the Positive Regulatory Environment CMC Strategy Forum on Continuous Manufacturing for Biologics • What are the business opportunities for introducing continuous manufacturing for biologics? • What are current gaps and hurdles for implementing continuous manufacturing for biologics? • What levels of automation in biopharmaceuticals is needed for continuous manufacturing? • What novel analytical technologies are Dr. Rapti D. Madurawe, needed for continuous manufacturing? FDA/CDER/OPQ/OPF, 2019 DIA CMC Workshop • What can we leverage from our knowledge of small molecule continuous manufacturing to enable or accelerate continuous manufacturing for biologics? The Forum Overview (1) Morning Session (Co-Chairs: Lindsay Arnold, MedImmune and Min Zhu, Boehringer Ingelheim Biopharmaceuticals ) • Industry Perspectives • Small molecule experience - Thomas Garcia, Pfizer, Inc. • Continuous biomanufacturing: experience and emerging opportunities - Erik Fouts, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. • Analytical Technologies • Control of continuous bioprocess (PAT) - Mark Brower, Merck & Co., Inc., • Panel Discussion • Participants will discuss pre-identified issues and brainstorm
    [Show full text]
  • Preclinical Development & IND Filing: Nuts, Bolts, Best Practices
    “Preclinical Development & IND Filing: Nuts, Bolts, Best Practices and Regulatory Aspects.” Speakers: Amit Kalgutkar (Pfizer), Chandra Prakash (Agios), Sanjeev Thohan (Novartis), Li- Chun Wang (Takeda), Wei Yin (Biogen) Organizers: Sanjeev Thohan and Chandra Prakash Date: 6/29/2017 Time: 8:30 am – 5.00 pm Location: Boston/Cambridge Area: Marriott Kendall Square, 50 Broadway, Cambridge MA 02142 Fees: $175 - Regular (before June 1st, 2017), $225 - Regular (after June 1st, 2017); $125 - Unemployed & Academic; $2000 - Major Sponsorship; $475 - Vendor Show Registration: www.PBSS.org Workshop Description: An investigational new drug application (IND) is an important milestone that marks the entry of a molecule into clinical development. Knowing the objectives, expectations and processes of assembling an IND is a key to not only successful filing, but also a promising clinical development path forward. Often there are cases where too many of our “nice-to-have” studies crowd the package at the expense of critical study needs/issues. This can lead to significant delays in clinical developments with back-and-forth of Q&A sessions both internally and with regulatory agencies. As we have seen, the regulatory landscape is changing as rapidly as the industry innovates into new therapeutic modalities. Therefore, it is critical to keep up to date on regulatory requirements and the industry’s best practices in different aspects of the IND: non- clinical safety, PK, CMC, and clinical plans. In this workshop, our speakers who bring years of experience with multiple successful IND filings, will discuss systematically the preclinical studies required for small molecule IND’s as well as the nuts and bolts of putting together a high–quality IND package.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Report COVID-19 Vaccine Astrazeneca EMA/94907/2021
    29 January 2021 EMA/94907/2021 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca Common name: COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S [recombinant]) Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005675/0000 Note Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2021. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 7 1.1. Submission of the dossier ..................................................................................... 7 1.2. Steps taken for the assessment of the product ........................................................ 9 2. Scientific discussion .............................................................................. 12 2.1. Problem statement ............................................................................................. 12 2.1.1. Disease or condition ........................................................................................ 12 2.1.2. Epidemiology and risk factors ........................................................................... 12 2.1.3. Aetiology and pathogenesis .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Attendee List
    Jennifer Abnet GlaxoSmithKline I GlaxoSmithKline I Jane Arboleda APRN Guardant I Molly Benson Sanjiv Agarwala MD Puma Biotechnology I Cancer Expert Now I Joe Arminger AbbVie I Seth Berkowitz LCSW, Manmeet Ahluwalia MD, CCLS MBA Patricia Armstrong The Leukemia & Lymphoma Miami Cancer Institute I Novartis I Society V Steve Albers Kim Arnold APRN CPNP Barry Berman MD, MS Alexion V CPHON Florida Cancer Specialists I Servier Pharmaceuticals I Maritza Alencar DNP, Tizano Bernard MBA, APRN, BMTCN Sheila Arrington MSN, Cancer Care Centers of Miami Cancer Institute V APRN, NP-C, AOCN Brevard I Puma Biotechnology I Carmen Allen MSIT Ana Mari Bernardini Pharmavoxx V Shannon Ashmon Novartis Oncology I Eisai, Inc I Luly Almeida Bernard Berry MBA Incyte Corporation I Sarah Ashton MS AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals Guardant Health I I Talat Almukhtar MD Orlando Health Cancer Melissa Austin Jason Bever Institute I Cancer Care Centers of Oncopeptides I Brevard I Beatrice Alvarado Roberts Amy Bignon MD Garland Avera Doyle Caris Life Sciences I University of Florida I Jazz Pharmaceuticals I Nadeem Bilani MD Tadeu Ambros MD Francie Babcock Cleveland Clinic I FCS I AMAG Pharmaceuticals/Covis I Angela Bilik RN BSN Douglas Anderson AstraZeneca I Incyte Corporation I Craig Bailey Astra Zeneca I Jamie Bilsky BS Blesson Andrews Genentech V Genentech I Kevin Barr Daiichi Sankyo I Rohit Bishnoi MD Ollie Annum PharmD University of Florida I BHMCR I Leonard Bennett PharmD EMD Serono I Brady Blackman Susmitha Apuri MD MorphoSys I Florida Cancer Specialists I Michael Bennett As of 4-22-21 Kimberly Blandon RN MSN Rick Breitenstein Memorial Cancer Institute I Apellis Pharmaceuticals I Denise Capo Karyopharm Therapeutics I Taryn Boiteau GlaxoSmithKline I Amanda Bridges Florida Society of Clinical Heidi Caravetta Tracy Bonds RN, BSN, Oncology I Exelixis, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase Ib/II Study of Xentuzumab, an IGF-Neutralising Antibody
    Schmid et al. Breast Cancer Research (2021) 23:8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-01382-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access A phase Ib/II study of xentuzumab, an IGF-neutralising antibody, combined with exemestane and everolimus in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer Peter Schmid1*, Marie-Paule Sablin2, Jonas Bergh3, Seock-Ah Im4, Yen-Shen Lu5, Noelia Martínez6, Patrick Neven7, Keun Seok Lee8, Serafín Morales9, J. Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo10, Douglas Adamson11, Anthony Gonçalves12, Aleix Prat13, Guy Jerusalem14, Laura Schlieker15, Rosa-Maria Espadero16, Thomas Bogenrieder17,18, Dennis Chin-Lun Huang19,20, John Crown21† and Javier Cortés22,23† Abstract Background: Xentuzumab—a humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody—binds IGF-1 and IGF-2, inhibiting their growth-promoting signalling and suppressing AKT activation by everolimus. This phase Ib/II exploratory trial evaluated xentuzumab plus everolimus and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive, locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC). Methods: Patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative LA/MBC resistant to non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors were enrolled. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of xentuzumab/ everolimus/exemestane were determined in phase I (single-arm, dose-escalation). In phase II (open-label), patients were randomised 1:1 to the RP2D of xentuzumab/everolimus/exemestane or everolimus/exemestane alone. Randomisation was stratified by the presence of visceral metastases. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). (Continued on next page) * Correspondence: [email protected] †John Crown and Javier Cortés contributed equally to this work. 1Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Astrazeneca-Oxford Vaccine Approved for Use in the U.K
    P2JW366000-6-A00100-17FFFF5178F ****** THURSDAY,DECEMBER 31,2020~VOL. CCLXXVI NO.154 WSJ.com HHHH $4.00 DJIA 30409.56 À 73.89 0.2% NASDAQ 12870.00 À 0.2% STOXX 600 400.25 g 0.3% 10-YR. TREAS. À 3/32 , yield 0.926% OIL $48.40 À $0.40 GOLD $1,891.00 À $10.50 EURO $1.2300 YEN 103.21 Deadly Attack at Airport Targets New Yemen Government U.S. IPO What’s News Market Reaches Business&Finance Record nvestorspiled into IPOs Iat a record rate in 2020, with companies raising Total $167.2 billion via 454 of- ferings on U.S. exchanges this year through Dec. 24. Few see signs of letup Few expect the euphoria after companies raise to wear off soon. A1 more than $167 billion Detenteisending in the global fight over tech taxes, despite pandemic with Franceresuming collec- tion of itsdigital-services tax BY MAUREEN FARRELL and the U.S. poised to retali- atewith tariffs.Other coun- Defying expectations,inves- tries areset to join the fray. A1 S tors piled intoinitial public of- China finished 2020 PRES feringsatarecordrateiN with a 10th consecutive TED 2020, and few expect the eu- month of expansion in its CIA phoria to wear off soon. manufacturing sector. A7 SO Companies raised $167.2 AS TheEUand China agreed TENSIONS HIGH: People fled after an explosion Wednesday at the airport in Aden, Yemen, moments after members of the billion through 454 offerings in principle on an invest- country’s newly sworn-in cabinet arrived. At least 22 people were killed, but all the members of the cabinet were safe.
    [Show full text]
  • GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC V. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC
    Case: 18-1976 Document: 111 Page: 1 Filed: 10/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM (CORK) LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2018-1976, 2018-2023 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-00878-LPS-CJB, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark. ______________________ Decided: October 2, 2020 ______________________ JUANITA ROSE BROOKS, Fish & Richardson, PC, San Diego, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by MICHAEL ARI AMON, CRAIG E. COUNTRYMAN, JONATHAN ELLIOT SINGER; ELIZABETH M. FLANAGAN, MICHAEL J. KANE, WILLIAM WOODFORD, Minneapolis, MN; DOUGLAS E. MCCANN, Wilmington, DE. WILLIAM M. JAY, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by JAIME ANN SANTOS; ELAINE BLAIS, J. Case: 18-1976 Document: 111 Page: 2 Filed: 10/02/2020 2 GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. ANTHONY DOWNS, ROBERT FREDERICKSON, III, CHRISTOPHER T. HOLDING, ALEXANDRA LU, LANA S. SHIFERMAN, DARYL L. WIESEN, Boston, MA; IRA J. LEVY, New York, NY. HANSJORG SAUER, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Biotechnology Innovation Organization. Also represented by MELISSA A. BRAND; BRIAN PAUL BARRETT, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. MICHAEL N. KENNEDY, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. Also represented by STEVEN JOHN WINKELMAN; DAVID EVAN KORN, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association of America, Washington, DC. ANDREW CURTIS NICHOLS, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Association for Accessible Medicines. Also represented by GEORGE C.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:12-cv-00472-BAH Document 42 Filed 07/05/12 Page 1 of 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-00472 (BAH) Judge Beryl A. Howell FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (“AstraZeneca”) has manufactured the drug quetiapine fumarate (“quetiapine”) under the brand name Seroquel® (“Seroquel”) since 1997 without generic competition. AstraZeneca brought this lawsuit, which presents a question of statutory interpretation, against the Food and Drug Administration, Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D., Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services (collectively, “the FDA”), to challenge the FDA’s approval, on March 27, 2012, of generic versions of Seroquel. See Complaint, ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”), ¶ 3. AstraZeneca believes that, under the plain language of 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(F)(iv), codifying Section 505(j)(5)(F)(iv) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), it is entitled to total market exclusivity until December 2, 2012 for the safety information encapsulated in “Table 2,” which was approved for all Seroquel labels on December 2, 2009 and must be included on the labels of all generic versions of quetiapine. Based upon this belief, AstraZeneca seeks a judgment that the FDA’s recent approval of generic versions of quetiapine, while AstraZeneca retains exclusivity over Table 2, violated AstraZeneca’s exclusivity rights and was arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law. 1 Case 1:12-cv-00472-BAH Document 42 Filed 07/05/12 Page 2 of 49 Pending before the Court are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed by AstraZeneca, ECF No.
    [Show full text]
  • Declarations of Interest Thorax: First Published As 10.1136/Thoraxjnl-2016-209333.476 on 15 November 2016
    Declarations of interest Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.476 on 15 November 2016. Downloaded from KF Rabe reports financial for support for consultancy work P297 LUNG-FUNCTION PROFILE BEFORE AND AFTER THE from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Novartis, MSD and GlaxoSmithKline, FIRST MODERATE TO SEVERE EXACERBATION DURING and grants from Altana, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD and THE WISDOM STUDY Nycomed. F Maltais reports financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.476 during the conduct of the study and, outside of the submitted work, financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoS- E Wouters, outside of the submitted work, reports personal fees mithKline for attendance at advisory boards, financial support from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Takeda, Pfizer from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and and Boehringer Ingelheim, and grants from AstraZeneca, GlaxoS- Novartis for speaking activities, and research support from Boeh- mithKline and Novartis. ringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Nycomed and H Magnussen received funding from Almirall, AstraZeneca, Novartis. Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novar- tis, Takeda and Roche to conduct clinical studies, and has spoken at meetings and is a member of advisory boards for these and P295 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TIOTROPIUM/OLODATEROL other companies. IN PATIENTS WITH COPD BY ATS CATEGORY R Rodriguez-Roisin reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mylan, Pearl Therapeutics, Takeda, Teva 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.474 and Ferrer, and grants and personal fees from Menarini and Almirall. F Maltais reports financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim K Tetzlaff and S Bell are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim during the conduct of the study and, outside of the submitted Pharma GmbH & Co.
    [Show full text]