DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Project Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1. PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter of the Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate (the Application) provides an overview of the Proponent, AuRico Metals Inc. (AuRico), and the proposed Kemess Underground Project (the Project). The chapter identifies the Project location and access, Project setting and history, mineral resources, geology and mineralization, project components and activities, project schedule, and project benefits. 1.2 PROPONENT DESCRIPTION 1.2.1 Proponent AuRico is a precious metals royalty and development company whose royalty assets include a 1.5% Net Smelter Royalty (NSR) on the Young-Davidson Gold Mine, a 0.25% NSR on the Williams Mine at Hemlo, and a 0.5% NSR on the Eagle River Mine – all located in Ontario, Canada. AuRico also has a 2% NSR on the Fosterville Mine, located in Victoria, Australia, and 100% ownership of the proposed Kemess Underground Project. The company was incorporated in Ontario (Corporation Number 1935481) on May 7, 2015 and registered in BC (Registration Number A0095422) on May 15, 2015, pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (2002a). On July 2, 2015 following the merger of AuRico Gold Inc. and Alamos Gold Inc., the Kemess Property was divested into the sole ownership of the newly formed AuRico Metals Inc. AuRico is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and its trading symbol is TSX:AMI. 1.2.2 Corporate Governance AuRico is governed by a board of directors with eight members, including a chairman. The board of directors is responsible for governance and stewardship of the company. AuRico is managed under the direction of: Chris Richter, Chief Executive Officer John Fitzgerald, Chief Operating Officer Rob Chausse, Chief Financial Officer Chris Rockingham, Vice President, Development AuRico’s head office is in Toronto, Ontario, and also has an office in Smithers: 110 Yonge Street, Suite 1601 Toronto, ON M5C 1T4 Telephone: 416-216-2780 (switchboard) Facsimile: 416-216-2781 Internet: www.auricometals.ca AURICO METALS INC. Kemess Underground Project | 1-1 APPLICATION FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE 1076 Main Street, Suite 2 PO Bag 3519 Smithers, BC V0J 2N0 Telephone: 250-877-7855 Facsimile: 888-501-4522 Communications regarding this Application should be directed to: John Fitzgerald, Chief Operating Officer Email: [email protected] Chris Rockingham, Vice President, Development Email: [email protected] Harold Bent, Director, Environment Email: [email protected] 1.2.3 Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Policies AuRico strives to be a good neighbour and understands the importance of supporting and contributing to the communities and regions where it operates while minimizing the company’s environmental footprint. AuRico’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Policy focuses on achieving a balance of economic prosperity, environmental stewardship and social responsibility through the consideration of employees and their families, communities where they work and the environment. Some of the keys commitments under the CSR include: • health and safety of workforce; • accountability, transparency, ethical behaviour and human rights; • sustainable development and performance; • minimizing environmental footprint; • building relationships within communities of operation; • supporting local suppliers; and • promoting a fair and positive outcome for all parties. AuRico’s Environmental Policy focuses on environmentally responsible practices to minimize the company’s environmental footprint. The policy includes commitment to environmental protection, obeying local laws, maintaining a high level of emergency preparedness as well as reducing the impact on natural resources. Additionally, Aurico’s Health and Safety Policy focuses on providing a safe and healthy work environment and maintaining a goal of zero injuries. 1-2 | Kemess Underground Project ERM | PROJ #0196303 | REV H.1 | MAY 2016 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.2.4 Consultants ERM Consultants Canada Ltd. (ERM) has been retained by AuRico to manage the environmental assessment (EA) process for the Project, including preparation of documentation for the Application. ERM offers a wide range of scientific, engineering, and socio-economic services to the resource development industry. ERM contact information is provided below. ERM 15th Floor, 1111 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6E 2J3 Telephone: 604-689-9460 Facsimile: 604-687-4277 Anne Currie, Partner in Charge Email: [email protected] Greg Norton, Project Manager Email: [email protected] 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT The purpose of the Project is to develop the Kemess Underground copper-gold deposit to help meet world demand for gold and copper in a manner that benefits Aboriginal groups, local communities, and federal, provincial, and municipal governments, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The Project consists of the economic extraction of copper and gold ore from the underground deposit using panel caving techniques and processing approximately 9 million tonnes per year (Mt/year) (average 24,650 tonnes per day (tpd) equivalent) with an average annual production rate estimated at 105,000 ounces of gold and 44 million pounds of copper, for a total of 1.3 million ounces of gold and 563 million pounds of copper produced over a mine life of approximately 13 years. Copper is mainly used in building wiring and plumbing, but also in other applications such as automotives and telecommunications. The demand for copper drives world mine production and usage, which increased by 16% in 2009 and 28% in 2014 (ICSG 2015). In 2014, the largest mine production of copper by country included Chile with 5,800 thousand metric tonnes, China with 1,620 thousand metric tonnes, Peru with 1,400 thousand metric tonnes and the United States with 1,370 thousand metric tonnes (Investing News 2015a). Canada was in the ninth place with a total mine production of 680,000 tonnes, representing production growth of 8% over 2013. The current price of copper is above US$ 2 per pound, however, economic conditions including a stronger US dollar and a slowing demand growth in China have the potential to drive this price below this level (Investing News 2015b). The consumer market for gold is dominated by India and China, which together account for 60% of the global jewelry sector and as much as 50% of the total bar and coin demand. Most of the gold production in the province of BC is exported to other countries. In 2008, the top destination countries AURICO METALS INC. Kemess Underground Project | 1-3 APPLICATION FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE for the export of gold, in its primary stage, included Japan (57%), South Korea (21%), and China (20%). The United States imports BC gold in a more refined stage that includes pure mineral, semi-finished and/or finished products (BC MEM Statistics 2013). The demand for gold is volatile and depends on gold prices and the state of the economy, that is, at lower prices the demand is higher (World Gold Council 2013). It is expected, therefore, that the Project will support industrial development needs, help to meet the overall global copper and gold demand, as well as contribute to the provincial total exports and economic growth. 1.4 PROJECT LOCATION AND ACCESS The Project is located at 57°0′N latitude by 126°45′W longitude, approximately 250 kilometres (km) north of Smithers, and 430 km northwest of Prince George (Figure 1.4-1). The Project is located on provincial Crown land in the Peace River Regional District (PRRD; UTM coordinates: Easting 636295 and Northing 6326428, NAD83). The Project is accessed via the existing Omineca Resource Access Road (ORAR) from Mackenzie. The closest communities to the Project by air are Kwadacha (Fort Ware; 79 km), Tsay Keh (111 km), and Takla Landing (182 km). The Project will use the existing airstrip, which serviced the past-producing Kemess South (KS) Mine (described in Section 1.5), to facilitate scheduled year-round flights from surrounding communities. 1.5 PROJECT HISTORY Mineral exploration has taken place in the Kemess area since 1889. A gold and copper deposit in the Kemess North area (the same area as the Kemess underground deposit) was first explored between 1966 and 1971 by Kennco Explorations (Canada) Ltd., who conducted soil, silt and bedrock geochemical sampling, drilling and geological mapping. In 1975 and 1976, Getty Mines Ltd. conducted further geotechnical mapping and limited geochemical work and drilling in the Kemess North area. In 1986, El Condor Resources optioned the property from Kennco, and completed electromagnetic surveys up to 1992 which led to the discovery of Kemess South (KS). In 1996 Royal Oak Mines acquired the KS property. A proven exploitable deposit identified to the south of Kemess North and named KS was pursued by Royal Oak Mines, and an environmental assessment certificate for the KS Project was received from the provincial government in 1996. In 2000, Northgate Minerals Exploration acquired a 95% royalty interest in the KS Mine and the associated Kemess North property following the bankruptcy of Royal Oak Mines. 1.5.1 Kemess South Mine Project Construction started in 1996 and the open pit mine operated from 1998 to 2011. The KS Mine’s average daily production rate was approximately 48,000 tonnes, for a total production of 3.0 million ounces of gold and 749 million pounds of copper from 218 Mt of ore. 1-4 | Kemess Underground Project ERM | PROJ #0196303 | REV H.1 | MAY 2016 Figure 1.4-1 Kemess Underground Project Location 130°0'0"W 125°0'0"W 120°0'0"W 115°0'0"W Great Slave Lake Northwest Territories Yukon 60°0'0"N ¤£1 60°0'0"N British Columbia Kemess Underground Kwadacha Alberta Project (Fort Ware) !. ¤£97 ^_ !. Tsay Keh ¤£37 Omineca Resource Alaska, Access Road Dawson Creek !. USA Takla !. Landing !. Mackenzie 55°0'0"N 55°0'0"N !. Smithers !. !. Fort St. Terrace James ¤£16 !. Prince George F r a ¤£16 s e r R i v e r Pacific Ocean ¤£97 Kemess Underground ^_ Project ¤£1 !.
Recommended publications
  • Duncan Lake): a Draft Report

    Duncan Lake): a Draft Report

    Tse Keh Nay Traditional and Contemporary Use and Occupation at Amazay (Duncan Lake): A Draft Report Amazay Lake Photo by Patrice Halley Draft Submission to the Kemess North Joint Review Panel May, 2007 Report Prepared By: Loraine Littlefield Linda Dorricott Deidre Cullon With Contributions By: Jessica Place Pam Tobin On Behalf of the Tse Keh Nay ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was written under the direction of the Tse Keh Nay leaders. The authors would like to thank Grand Chief Gordon Pierre and Chief Johnny Pierre of the Tsay Keh Dene First Nation; Chief John Allen French of the Takla Lake First Nation and Chief Donny Van Somer of the Kwadacha First Nation for their support and guidance throughout this project. The authors are particularly indebted to the advisors for this report who took the time to meet with us on very short notice and who generously shared with us their knowledge of Tse Keh Nay history, land and culture. We hope that this report accurately reflects this knowledge. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Grand Chief Gordon Pierre, Ray Izony, Bill Poole, Trevor Tomah, Jean Isaac, Robert Tomah, Chief John Allen French, Josephine West, Frank Williams, Cecilia Williams, Lillian Johnny, Hilda George and Fred Patrick. We would also like to thank the staff at the Prince George band and treaty offices for assembling and providing us with the documents, reports, maps and other materials that were used in this report. J.P. Laplante, Michelle Lochhead, Karl Sturmanis, Kathaleigh George, and Henry Joseph all provided valuable assistance and support to the project.
  • COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer

    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer

    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Northern Mountain population Central Mountain population Southern Mountain population in Canada Northern Mountain population - SPECIAL CONCERN Central Mountain population - ENDANGERED Southern Mountain population - ENDANGERED 2014 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2014. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Northern Mountain population, Central Mountain population and Southern Mountain population in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xxii + 113 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2002. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 98 pp. (Species at Risk Status Reports) Thomas, D.C., and D.R. Gray. 2002. Update COSEWIC status report on the woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Woodland Caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-98 pp. Kelsall, J.P. 1984. COSEWIC status report on the woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 103 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Deborah Cichowski for writing the status report on Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Northern Mountain population, Central Mountain population and Southern Mountain population in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This status report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee.
  • Distribution, Nature, and Origin of Neogene–Quaternary Magmatism in the Northern Cordilleran Volcanic Province, Canada

    Distribution, Nature, and Origin of Neogene–Quaternary Magmatism in the Northern Cordilleran Volcanic Province, Canada

    Distribution, nature, and origin of Neogene–Quaternary magmatism in the northern Cordilleran volcanic province, Canada Benjamin R. Edwards* Igneous Petrology Laboratory, Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, James K. Russell } University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada ABSTRACT Cordillera, driven by changes in relative these diverse volcanic rocks in space and time. plate motion between the Pacific and North We then use the compiled petrological and geo- The northern Cordilleran volcanic province American plates ca. 15–10 Ma. chemical data to address the origins of this alka- encompasses a broad area of Neogene to Qua- line magmatism and the structure of the litho- ternary volcanism in northwestern British Keywords: alkaline basalt, Canada, Cordil- sphere beneath the northern Cordilleran volcanic Columbia, the Yukon Territory, and adjacent leran, magmatism, Quaternary, volcanism. province. Specifically, we determine the source eastern Alaska. Volcanic rocks of the north- region characteristics of northern Cordilleran ern Cordilleran volcanic province range in INTRODUCTION volcanic province magmas using trace element age from 20 Ma to ca. 200 yr B.P. and are and isotopic data, and we produce a petrological dominantly alkali olivine basalt and hawai- Neogene to Quaternary magmatism in the image of the lithosphere using phase equilibria ite. A variety of more strongly alkaline rock Cordillera of North America is closely related to calculations for lavas and mantle peridotite types not commonly found in the North the current tectonic configuration between the xenoliths. Results of this analysis provide a basis American Cordillera are locally abundant in North American, Pacific, and Juan de Fuca plates on which to amplify the tectonic model we have the northern Cordilleran volcanic province.
  • 1969 Mountaineer Outings

    1969 Mountaineer Outings

    The Mountaineer -- The Mountaineer 1970 Cover Photo: Caribou on the move in the Arctic Wildlife Range­ Wilbur M. Mills Entered as second-class matter, April 8, 1922, at Post Office, Seattle, Wash­ ingt-0n, under the Act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly and semi-monthly during June by The Mountaineers, P.O. Box 122, Seattle, Washington, 98111. Clubroom is at 719Vz Pike Street, Seattle. Subscription price monthly Bulletin and Annual, $5.00 per year. EDITORIAL STAFF: Alice Thorn, editor; Mary Cox, assistant editor; Loretta Slater, Joan Firey. Material and photographs should be submitted to The Mountaineers, at above address, before February 1, 1971, for consideration. Photographs should be black and white glossy prints, 5x7, with caption and photographer's name on back. Manuscripts should be typed doublespaced and include writer's name, address and phone number. Manuscripts cannot be returned. Properly identified photos will be returned sometime around June. The Mountaineers To explore and study the rrwuntains, forests, and watercourses of the Northwest; To gather into permanent form the history and traditions of this region; To preserve by the encouragement of pro­ tective Legislation or otherwise the natural beauty of Northwest America; To make expeditions into these regions in fulfillment of the above purposes; To encourage a spirit of good fellowship arrwng an Lovers of outdoor Life. Fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) is the Yukon Territorial Flower-Mickey Lammers The Mountaineer Vol. 64, No. 12, October 1970-0rganized 1906-Incorporated 1913 CONTENTS Yukon Days, John Lammers . 6 Climbing in the Yukon, M. E. Alford 29 The Last Great Wilderness, Wilbur M.
  • An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia

    An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia

    An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia Dennis A. Demarchi Third Edition March, 2011 Ecosystem Information Section Ministry of Environment Victoria, British Columbia An Introduction to the Ecoregions of British Columbia 2 Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 Ecoregions Classification Order .......................................................................................................5 PART I: Ecoregion Classification Background ........................................................................ 15 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 15 British Columbia's Environment – The Setting ............................................................................... 16 The British Columbia Ecoregion Classification ................................................................................ 18 Uses of the British Columbia Ecosystem Classification ....................................................................... 20 PART II: Ecoregion Unit Descriptions .................................................................................... 22 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 22 Cool Oceanic Ecodomain ....................................................................................................................
  • Landforms of British Columbia 1976

    Landforms of British Columbia 1976

    Landforms of British Columbia A Physiographic Outline bY Bulletin 48 Stuart S. Holland 1976 FOREWORD British Columbia has more variety in its climate and scenery than any other Province of Canada. The mildness and wetness of the southern coast is in sharp contrast with the extreme dryness of the desert areas in the interior and the harshness of subarctic conditions in the northernmost parts. Moreover, in every part, climate and vegetation vary with altitude and to a lesser extent with configuration of the land. Although the Province includes almost a thousand-mile length of one of the world’s greatest mountain chains, that which borders the north Pacitic Ocean, it is not all mountainous but contains a variety of lowlands and intermontane areas. Because of the abundance of mountains, and because of its short history of settlement, a good deal of British Columbia is almost uninhabited and almost unknown. However, the concept of accessibility has changed profoundly in the past 20 years, owing largely to the use of aircraft and particularly the helicopter. There is now complete coverage by air photography, and by far the largest part of the Province has been mapped topographically and geologically. In the same period of time the highways have been very greatly improved, and the secondary roads are much more numerous. The averagecitizen is much more aware of his Province, but, although knowledge has greatly improved with access,many misconceptions remain on the part of the general public as to the precise meaning even of such names as Cascade Mountains, Fraser Plateau, and many others.