DOCSLIB.ORG

Τ Detection and Ν Oscillation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Τ Detection and Ν Oscillation τ detection and ν oscillation Gaston WILQUET Symposium in honorem Prof. Jean SACTON Brussels, 7 - 8 September 2000 Contents • The neutrino identity (brief) • Limits on neutrino masses • Neutrino oscillation phenomenology (brief) • Status of search for neutrino oscillation • OPERA : search for νµ⇔ντ oscillation in LBL accelerator experiment (refer to K.Niwa’s talk) • The neutrino mass and the mass budget of the Universe (if time allows) The Standard Model neutrino • The electron-neutrino νe is the massless, chargeless, colourless, spin 1/2, partner of the electron in the left handed SU(2) × U(1) lepton doublet • Neutrinos also exist in 3 families like the other fermions (measured at LEP from the width of the Z0; why? why 3?) νννe µτ −−− e LLL µτ • The lepton numbers Le , Lµ , Lτ are conserved independently B.R.(µγ− →<× e−− ) 51011 • Only ννLR and have CC and NC weak interactions (P conservation is fully violated) • If they exist, ννRL and are sterile Massless ν and ν are distinct by their observable helicity ≡ invariant chirality Massless neutrinos may not be overtaken and their spin cannot be flipped What if neutrinos have (even tiny) mass Dirac or Majorana neutrinos? − • νβ+ emitted in decay has vν <c may be overtaken and undergo spin flip → ν − + • Is it different from the νβ− emitted in decay? They only differ by L If yes: Dirac neutrinos, like other fermions, distinguished by L =±1 eigenvalues If no : Majorana neutrinos, νν≡ apparent distinction is artefact of - their V-A interactions - the difficulty to "flip spin" Limits on the neutrino masses: 1/ Direct measurements from decay kinematics • @%C.L.95 m..eVνe < 22− 2 3 33 − from end of E − spectrum in HHee→++ ν e e (Troitsk and Mainz experiments, 2000) • @%C.90L mkeVνµ <170 ++ from E + in πµν→ µ µ (Assagam et al, PSI, 1996) • @%C.L90 m.MeVντ <18 2 ±± from phase space in τπν→ 35() ττ()ν (LEP -ALEPH 2000) Limits on the neutrino masses: 2/ Big Bang cosmology 10 2 •≈×≈ At T210K2MeVm ν (t1kT0.25s) =() ≈ γνν and / decouple : ννγγ+↔+ nnνγ≈ TTνγ≈ • Taking account of - the thermodynamics of fermions/bosons - the adiabatic expension of the univers +− + − - γγγ and e/e decouple: e+↔+ e at T ≈ me ≈ 0.5eV 3 n03==n(03 412cm− ) = 113 cm− at present epoch ν 11 γ 4 1 T21o ===≈( )3 T0 ( 2.73 K ) 1.9 K × 0eV−4 ν 11 γ -4 • Yet undetected primeval neutrinos are non-relativistic if mν >10 eV 2 003H0 − 3 mνν×≈ n = ρρ ν<c = 4 . 5 keV cm 8πGN −−11 with H0 =±65 7 km s kpc meV≤ 60 ∑ νi i Limits on the neutrino masses: 3/ Supernovae SN1987A • February 23, 1987, 7h33 UT, 23 neutrino interactions in 3 underground experiments (Kamiokande, Japan; IMB, Ohio; Baksan, Caucase) in 12.3 s time gate • SN1987A: death of Sanduleak in LMC at 150 000 ly 46 58 SN-II models: 99% of ~2. 10 J released → ~10 ν with <Eν>=10 MeV after 150 000 y : 10s flash of ~4. 1043 ν cross the Earth • From measured and model energy spectrum model emission time dispersion measured arrival time dispersion Confirmation of the SN-II models meV≤∼ 25 ν e • Identical fluxes of all ν and ν species expected − Events expected to be ννee (much larger +→+nep cross-section) Limit on the neutrino masses: 4/ 0νββ decay experiments • The nuclear 0νββ decay experiment is THE ν spin-flip experiment (A,Z)→++ (A,Z2 ) 2 e− ∆ L =2 Process possible if the − - emitted right-handed ν e together with e - _ e e ν ν − e e absorbed as left-handed ν e to produce e W- Massive Majorana neutrino : d u W- ννee≡ and spin flipped d u T21090(Ge76→+> 76 See)− 25 y @ %C.L. d u 1 2 32 34 d u m.eV≤ 046 ν e B.Pontecorvo Massive neutrinos: 1957 Mixing & Neutrino oscillations B.Pontecorvo, V.N. Grimov 1967 ν l le,,= µτ family eigenstates ν k k,= 1 3 mass eigenstates 3 ννe 1 ννllkk= ∑U k,=1 ν ==U νµτle,, µ 2 3 2 νν U = 1 τ 3 ∑ αk k,=1 4 (6) parameters 3 U lk Dirac (Majorana) 1 (3) phases Straightforward extension to more than 3 neutrinos families, e.g. sterile neutrinos Oscillation cannot distinguish Dirac from Majorana neutrinos Propagation phase -i( E t - p L ) − i( m2 /( 2E ))L E ≈>>⇒p m e kk ≈e k + 3 u µ τ − + π + W ντ :Uτk νµµ:U k ν k ∑ + W k1= d d u n ddp u u Coherent propagation of different mass eigenstates over long L Oscillation probability (in practical units) P ((ν llllL0= )→=−νδ'' ()) L 13, ∆ meVLkm22[][] 4UUUU127Re(** sin2 . kk ' ∑ lk'' lk ' lk ' lk EGeV[] kk,'> k Mixingsdefine Maximum L/ E Oscillation term probability Sum on pairs of mass eigenstates 222 222 ∆∆∆∆mmmkk'' = k− k mmm0 12+ 23 + 31 = Neutrinos oscillate if massive and masses are non degenerate and if mixing between mass and weak eigenstates One mixing negligible : effective 2-family approximation cosθθeeµµ sin e.g. ντ ≈ν3 U ≈ 1 mixing angle, no phase − sinθθeeµµ cos ∆mL2 P2127()sinsin(.)νν→=22 θ 12 eeµµ E All mixings small : effective 2-family approximation 1 θθeeµτ U1≈−θθ all νl ≈νk eµµτ −−θθeτµτ1 ∆mL2 P2127()()sin(.)νν→= θ 2 kk ' lllll''≠ E Strong mass hierarchy : effective 2-family approximation if mm,m312 like quarks and charged leptons ν3 22222 ∆mmmmm=−≈−31 32 222 2 δ mmm=−21 ∆m ∆δmm22 ν δm2 2 ⇓ ν1 L/ E region where ∆ m2 L/ E causes oscillation 2 mν and δ mL/E2 ≈ 0 ⇓ 22eff 2 P(ννl→≈ l'≠ l ) sin2127 θ ll' sin ( . ∆ m E / L) 2 2 eff sin24θll'= U l33 U l' Physics governed by: • ∆m2 • family composition of ν3 only Example of 2-family approximation: large mixing and strong mass hierarchy oscillation in phase (2-family like) from source composition from first process E = 1GeV strong mass hierarchy ∆λmeVkm232=×310− → = 825 δΛmeVkm272=×110− → = 2.5 ×10 7 large mixing -0.567 0.820 -0.0782 U = 0.515 0.279 -0.811 0.643 0.500 0.580 E 2 2 sin 1.27 ⇒ oscillation damping for large ∆m 2 ∆mL 1 dispersion and resolution in L/E 2 Matter effect on neutrino oscillations • Propagation phase in matter for weakly interacting particles ipx−−iEt in px iEt ee⇒ e e nfE=+12πρ (0)/ Z EMeV=<−=1 : 0 | n 1 | 6.10−−19ρ [ gcm 3 ] 1 ν A • ννννes,µτ , , have different interact ions thus nes,,µ τ , : −− ννee,,µ ττ+ eq,→+ ,,µ eq , (NC) −− ννee+→ee (CC) ν s no interaction • Mass eigenstates have different family eigenstates composition ⇒ Coherence of mass eigenstates propagation is affected by matter Matter effect on neutrino oscillations Oscillation enhancement Oscillation can be enhanced by matter and is maximum for 2 given electron density ρ∆θR (Em | , ) where mixing is full even if mixing in vacuum is extremely small MSW effect If neutrinos travel through medium where ρρeR varies and crosses slowly (e.g. through the Sun): ν e created in the Sun core may disappear totally into ν µ by reaching the Sun surface. Energy spectrum distortion ρ R = ρ R ()E Solar neutrino oscillation experiments Firsts experimental hints of neutrinos oscillation dates back from 1968 The solar neutrino deficit problem Radiochemical Experiments − ν e +→(Z,A)e +(Z + 1,A) τ (Z,A+≈ 1) 10 days Water Cerenkov −− Counting experiment νν+→+ee ν + ee−−→+ν Low E threshold ee High E threshold Ga Cl nuclear fusion pp cycle Measure E, θ,t 1 4 + 4 H→ He + 2 e + 2 νe + 25 MeV 38− 1 Φν(Sun)=× 1.s 8 10 e 10-- 2 1 ν νBe Φν(Earth)= 6. 5 10 e cm s pp KAMIOKANDE CHLORINE SuperK • ν pp 99.75% of flux: bound by Sun luminosity ν very low energy B very difficult to detect extremely low rate GALLEX SAGE GNO •− Strong correlation ννBe B fluxes Eν(MeV) Measured event rates v.z. SSM predictions GNO +10. 8 65. 8−10. 2 Overall flux deficit 03./.≤≤ΦΦmeas pred 06 +78. 75. 4−74. +0. 015 0.. 465± 0 005−0. 013 A Crude solution meas pred ΦΦννpp≈ pp bound by Luminosity meas pred ΦΦννBB≈ 0.5 not well known meas Φν Be ≈ 0 not well known pred pred Contradiction with strong ΦΦννBe− B correlation No astrophysical explanation νe→νx (νµ,ντ, νs) Oscillation Signals? Inside the Sun? Between Sun-Earth? χ2/NDF = 13.7/17 - Total flux too low by factor 0.3-0.5 in all 6 experiments - E spectrum distortion: Eν SuperK and SSM spectra agree (En >6.5 MeV): - Seasonal effects: Effect of Sun-Earth distance variation (besides 1/L2): SuperK flux time dependence agrees with 1/L 2(t) - Day/Night effect: matter effect inside Earth ? SuperK flux time dependence compatible with no effect D-N =−0.. 034 ± 0 022+0. 013 (D+N)/2 −0. 012 Flux deficit is the only smoking gun Y.Suzuki Neutrino 2000 Y.Susuki Vietnam 2000 Global fit for ν eactive→ ννν (µ or τ ) Allowed by SK All measurements Excluded by SK Day/Night spectrum only Allowed by Ga+Cl+SK Flux measurements only Oscillation in Sun matter @ 95% C.L. Oscillation in vacuum 2 Y.Suzuki Neutrino 2000 tan θ Y.Susuki Vietnam 2000 Note Global fit for ν eactive→ ννν (µ or τ ) 2 solutions at sin2 2θ ≈ 1 ∆meV2452≈−10−− 10 ∆meV272≈ 10− @ 95% C.L. νe→νs disfavoured at 95% C.L. 2 Y.Suzuki Neutrino 2000 tan θ Y.Susuki Vietnam 2000 Note Solar neutrino oscillation: Summary and Future The solar neutrino deficit can be explained by νe oscillation to active neutrinos @ 95% C.L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1909.09434V2 [Hep-Ph] 8 Jul 2020
    Implications of the Dark LMA solution and Fourth Sterile Neutrino for Neutrino-less Double Beta Decay K. N. Deepthi,1, ∗ Srubabati Goswami,2, y Vishnudath K. N.,2, z and Tanmay Kumar Poddar2, 3, x 1School of Natural Sciences, Mahindra Ecole Centrale, Hyderabad - 500043, India 2Theoretical Physics Division, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad - 380009, India 3Discipline of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar - 382355, India Abstract We analyze the effect of the Dark-large mixing angle (DLMA) solution on the effective Majorana mass (mββ) governing neutrino-less double beta decay (0νββ) in the presence of a sterile neutrino. We consider the 3+1 picture, comprising of one additional sterile neutrino. We have checked that the MSW resonance in the sun can take place in the DLMA parameter space in this scenario. Next we investigate how the values of the solar mixing angle θ12 corresponding to the DLMA region alter the predictions of mββ by including a sterile neutrino in the analysis. We also compare our results with three generation cases for both standard large mixing angle (LMA) and DLMA. Additionally, we evaluate the discovery sensitivity of the future 136Xe experiments in this context. arXiv:1909.09434v2 [hep-ph] 8 Jul 2020 ∗ Email Address: [email protected] y Email Address: [email protected] z Email Address: [email protected] x Email Address: [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION The standard three flavour neutrino oscillation picture has been corroborated by the data from decades of experimentation on neutrinos. However some exceptions to this scenario have been re- ported over the years, calling for the necessity of transcending beyond the three neutrino paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Physics Related to Underground Labs
    ANDES: A survey of the physics related to underground labs. Osvaldo Civitarese Dept.of Physics, University of La Plata and IFLP-CONICET ANDES/CLES working group ANDES: A survey of the physics related to underground labs. – p. 1 Plan of the talk The field in perspective The neutrino mass problem The two-neutrino and neutrino-less double beta decay Neutrino-nucleus scattering Constraints on the neutrino mass and WR mass from LHC-CMS and 0νββ Dark matter Supernovae neutrinos, matter formation Sterile neutrinos High energy neutrinos, GRB Decoherence Summary The field in perspective How the matter in the Universe was (is) formed ? What is the composition of Dark matter? Neutrino physics: violation of fundamental symmetries? The atomic nucleus as a laboratory: exploring physics at large scale. Neutrino oscillations Building neutrino flavor states from mass eigenstates νl = Uliνi i X Energy of the state m2c4 E ≈ pc + i i 2E Probability of survival/disappearance 2 ′ −i(Ei−Ep)t/h¯ ∗ P (νl → νl′ )= | δ(l, l )+ Ul′i(e − 1)Uli | 6 Xi=p 2 2 4 (mi −mp )c L provided 2Ehc¯ ≥ 1 Neutrino oscillations The existence of neutrino oscillations was demonstrated by experiments conducted at SNO and Kamioka. The Swedish Academy rewarded the findings with two Nobel Prices : Koshiba, Davis and Giacconi (2002) and Kajita and Mc Donald (2015) Some of the experiments which contributed (and still contribute) to the measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters are K2K, Double CHOOZ, Borexino, MINOS, T2K, Daya Bay. Like other underground labs ANDES will certainly be a good option for these large scale experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Eddy Larkin's Thesis
    Library Declaration and Deposit Agreement 1. STUDENT DETAILS Edward John Peter Larkin 1258942 2. THESIS DEPOSIT 2.1 I understand that under my registration at the University, I am required to deposit my thesis with the University in BOTH hard copy and in digital format. The digital version should normally be saved as a single pdf file. 2.2 The hard copy will be housed in the University Library. The digital ver- sion will be deposited in the Universitys Institutional Repository (WRAP). Unless otherwise indicated (see 2.3 below) this will be made openly ac- cessible on the Internet and will be supplied to the British Library to be made available online via its Electronic Theses Online Service (EThOS) service. [At present, theses submitted for a Masters degree by Research (MA, MSc, LLM, MS or MMedSci) are not being deposited in WRAP and not being made available via EthOS. This may change in future.] 2.3 In exceptional circumstances, the Chair of the Board of Graduate Studies may grant permission for an embargo to be placed on public access to the hard copy thesis for a limited period. It is also possible to apply separately for an embargo on the digital version. (Further information is available in the Guide to Examinations for Higher Degrees by Research.) 2.4 (a) Hard Copy I hereby deposit a hard copy of my thesis in the University Library to be made publicly available to readers immediately. I agree that my thesis may be photocopied. (b) Digital Copy I hereby deposit a digital copy of my thesis to be held in WRAP and made available via EThOS.
    [Show full text]
  • 01Ii Beam Line
    STA N FO RD LIN EA R A C C ELERA TO R C EN TER Fall 2001, Vol. 31, No. 3 CONTENTS A PERIODICAL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FALL 2001 VOL. 31, NUMBER 3 Guest Editor MICHAEL RIORDAN Editors RENE DONALDSON, BILL KIRK Contributing Editors GORDON FRASER JUDY JACKSON, AKIHIRO MAKI MICHAEL RIORDAN, PEDRO WALOSCHEK Editorial Advisory Board PATRICIA BURCHAT, DAVID BURKE LANCE DIXON, EDWARD HARTOUNI ABRAHAM SEIDEN, GEORGE SMOOT HERMAN WINICK Illustrations TERRY ANDERSON Distribution CRYSTAL TILGHMAN The Beam Line is published quarterly by the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Box 4349, Stanford, CA 94309. Telephone: (650) 926-2585. EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: (650) 926-4500 Issues of the Beam Line are accessible electroni- cally on the World Wide Web at http://www.slac. stanford.edu/pubs/beamline. SLAC is operated by Stanford University under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. The opinions of the authors do not necessarily reflect the policies of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Cover: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory detects neutrinos from the sun. This interior view from beneath the detector shows the acrylic vessel containing 1000 tons of heavy water, surrounded by photomultiplier tubes. (Courtesy SNO Collaboration) Printed on recycled paper 2 FOREWORD 32 THE ENIGMATIC WORLD David O. Caldwell OF NEUTRINOS Trying to discern the patterns of neutrino masses and mixing. FEATURES Boris Kayser 42 THE K2K NEUTRINO 4 PAULI’S GHOST EXPERIMENT A seventy-year saga of the conception The world’s first long-baseline and discovery of neutrinos. neutrino experiment is beginning Michael Riordan to produce results. Koichiro Nishikawa & Jeffrey Wilkes 15 MINING SUNSHINE The first results from the Sudbury 50 WHATEVER HAPPENED Neutrino Observatory reveal TO HOT DARK MATTER? the “missing” solar neutrinos.
    [Show full text]
  • RECENT RESULTS from ICECUBE on NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS 1 Introduction Neutrino Oscillations Were Discovered by Super-Kamiokande In
    RECENT RESULTS FROM ICECUBE ON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS J. P. A. M. de Andre,´ for the IceCube Collaborationa Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA The IceCube Neutrino Observatory, located at the South Pole, is the world's largest neutrino 2 2 detector. IceCube is well placed to probe the existence of sterile neutrinos with ∆m41 ≈ 1 eV , which is a region of particular interest for the various anomalies motivating the existence of sterile neutrinos, by looking for muon neutrino disappearance around 1 TeV. In addition to that, using data from a more densely instrumented region of the detector, DeepCore, IceCube can be used to precisely measure regular neutrino oscillations and, by looking at distortions on those oscillations, further probe the existence of sterile neutrinos. We will discuss recent results from IceCube on neutrino oscillations, both related to searches for sterile neutrino and to precision measurement of the atmospheric mixing angles. 1 Introduction Neutrino oscillations were discovered by Super-Kamiokande in 1998 1 through the measurement of atmospheric neutrinos, and SNO in 2002 2 through the measurement of solar neutrinos. The parameters describing the standard three flavor neutrino oscillation have been measured with varying precision by many different experiments (see Ref. 3 and references therein) with the 2 exception of the CP-violating phase (δCP ) and the mass ordering (the sign of ∆m32). The am- plitude of the neutrino oscillation is determined by the elements of the mixing matrix, described by the mixing angles (θ12, θ13, and θ23) and δCP , while its oscillation period in vacuum depends 2 2 on j∆m32jL=E and j∆m21jL=E, where E is the neutrino energy, L is the distance between its 2 production and interaction points, and ∆mji is the difference between the square of the masses of νj and νi.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1704.02291V1 [Physics.Ins-Det] 7 Apr 2017 the Agreement of Its Output with Data
    The Monte Carlo simulation of the Borexino detector M. Agostini,1 K. Altenm¨uller,2 S. Appel,2 V. Atroshchenko,3 Z. Bagdasarian,4 D. Basilico,5 G. Bellini,5 J. Benziger,6 D. Bick,7 G. Bonfini,8 L. Borodikhina,3 D. Bravo,9, 5 B. Caccianiga,5 F. Calaprice,10 A. Caminata,11 S. Caprioli,5 M. Carlini,8 P. Cavalcante,8, 9 A. Chepurnov,12 K. Choi,13 D. D'Angelo,5 S. Davini,11 A. Derbin,14 X.F. Ding,1 L. Di Noto,11 I. Drachnev,1, 14 K. Fomenko,15 A. Formozov,5 D. Franco,16 F. Froborg,10 F. Gabriele,8 C. Galbiati,10 C. Ghiano,11 M. Giammarchi,5 M. Goeger-Neff,2 A. Goretti,10 M. Gromov,12 C. Hagner,7 T. Houdy,16 E. Hungerford,17 Aldo Ianniy,8 Andrea Ianni,10 A. Jany,18 D. Jeschke,2 V. Kobychev,19 D. Korablev,15 G. Korga,17 D. Kryn,16 M. Laubenstein,8 E. Litvinovich,3, 20 F. Lombardiz,8 P. Lombardi,5 L. Ludhova,4, 21 G. Lukyanchenko,3 I. Machulin,3, 20 G. Manuzio,11 S. Marcocci,1, 11 J. Martyn,22 E. Meroni,5 M. Meyer,7 L. Miramonti,5 M. Misiaszek,18 V. Muratova,14 B. Neumair,2 L. Oberauer,2 B. Opitz,7 F. Ortica,23 M. Pallavicini,11 L. Papp,2 A. Pocar,24 G. Ranucci,5 A. Re,5 A. Romani,23 R. Roncin,8, 16 N. Rossi,8 S. Sch¨onert,2 D. Semenov,14 P. Shakina,14 M. Skorokhvatov,3, 20 O.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Oscillations: the Rise of the PMNS Paradigm Arxiv:1710.00715
    Neutrino oscillations: the rise of the PMNS paradigm C. Giganti1, S. Lavignac2, M. Zito3 1 LPNHE, CNRS/IN2P3, UPMC, Universit´eParis Diderot, Paris 75252, France 2Institut de Physique Th´eorique,Universit´eParis Saclay, CNRS, CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette, France∗ 3IRFU/SPP, CEA, Universit´eParis-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France November 17, 2017 Abstract Since the discovery of neutrino oscillations, the experimental progress in the last two decades has been very fast, with the precision measurements of the neutrino squared-mass differences and of the mixing angles, including the last unknown mixing angle θ13. Today a very large set of oscillation results obtained with a variety of experimental config- urations and techniques can be interpreted in the framework of three active massive neutrinos, whose mass and flavour eigenstates are related by a 3 3 unitary mixing matrix, the Pontecorvo- × Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix, parameterized by three mixing angles θ12, θ23, θ13 and a CP-violating phase δCP. The additional parameters governing neutrino oscillations are the squared- mass differences ∆m2 = m2 m2, where m is the mass of the ith neutrino mass eigenstate. This ji j − i i review covers the rise of the PMNS three-neutrino mixing paradigm and the current status of the experimental determination of its parameters. The next years will continue to see a rich program of experimental endeavour coming to fruition and addressing the three missing pieces of the puzzle, namely the determination of the octant and precise value of the mixing angle θ23, the unveiling of the neutrino mass ordering (whether m1 < m2 < m3 or m3 < m1 < m2) and the measurement of the CP-violating phase δCP.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1504.03600V2 [Hep-Ex] 11 Jun 2015 L Ihetadmnin.Osrig0 Observing Dimensions
    A Combined Limit on the Neutrino Mass from Neutrinoless Double-β Decay and Constraints on Sterile Majorana Neutrinos Pawel Guzowski,1 Luke Barnes,1 Justin Evans,1 Georgia Karagiorgi,1 Nathan McCabe,1 and Stefan S¨oldner-Rembold1 1The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom (Dated: September 18, 2018) We present a framework to combine data from the latest neutrinoless double-β decay experiments for multiple isotopes and derive a limit on the effective neutrino mass mββ using the experimental energy distributions. The combined limits on mββ range between 130−310 meV, where the spread is due to different model calculations of nuclear matrix elements (NMEs). The statistical consistency (p values) between this result and the signal observation claimed by the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment is derived. The limits on mββ are also evaluated in a (3 + 1) sterile neutrino model, assuming all neutrinos are Majorana particles. PACS numbers: 23.40.-s,14.60.Pq,14.60.St I. INTRODUCTION detector material and 0νββ isotope are identical are con- strained in the choice of isotope by the detector technol- ogy. This approach is employed by collaborations such as The observation of neutrinoless double-β (0νββ) de- 76 cays would demonstrate the Majorana nature of neu- gerda [5], which uses a high-purity Ge detector, exo- trinos [1], representing direct evidence for physics be- 200 [6] and kamland-zen [7], which contain enriched 136Xe, and cuoricino [8] and cuore-0 [9], bolometers yond the standard model. Neutrinoless double-β decay 130 is a second-order electroweak process where a nucleus made of TeO2 crystals containing Te.
    [Show full text]
  • Ev-Scale Sterile Neutrino Search Using Eight Years of Atmospheric Muon Neutrino Data from the Icecube Neutrino Observatory
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 125, 141801 (2020) Editors' Suggestion Featured in Physics eV-Scale Sterile Neutrino Search Using Eight Years of Atmospheric Muon Neutrino Data from the IceCube Neutrino Observatory M. G. Aartsen,17 R. Abbasi,16 M. Ackermann,56 J. Adams,17 J. A. Aguilar,12 M. Ahlers,21 M. Ahrens,47 C. Alispach,27 N. M. Amin,40 K. Andeen,38 T. Anderson,53 I. Ansseau,12 G. Anton,25 C. Argüelles ,14 J. Auffenberg,1 S. Axani,14 H. Bagherpour,17 X. Bai,44 A. Balagopal,30 A. Barbano,27 S. W. Barwick,29 B. Bastian,56 V. Basu,36 V. Baum,37 S. Baur,12 † R. Bay,8 J. J. Beatty,19,20 K.-H. Becker,55 J. Becker Tjus,11 S. BenZvi,46 D. Berley,18 E. Bernardini,56,* D. Z. Besson,31, G. Binder,8,9 D. Bindig,55 E. Blaufuss,18 S. Blot,56 C. Bohm,47 S. Böser,37 O. Botner,54 J. Böttcher,1 E. Bourbeau,21 J. Bourbeau,36 F. Bradascio,56 J. Braun,36 S. Bron,27 J. Brostean-Kaiser,56 A. Burgman,54 J. Buscher,1 R. S. Busse,39 T. Carver,27 C. Chen,6 E. Cheung,18 D. Chirkin,36 S. Choi,49 B. A. Clark,23 K. Clark,32 L. Classen,39 A. Coleman,40 G. H. Collin,14 J. M. Conrad,14 P. Coppin,13 P. Correa,13 D. F. Cowen,52,53 R. Cross,46 P. Dave, 6 C. De Clercq,13 J. J. DeLaunay,53 H. Dembinski,40 K. Deoskar,47 S. De Ridder,28 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Neutrino Oscillations in Atmospheric Neutrinos with the Icecube Deepcore Detector
    Measurement of neutrino oscillations in atmospheric neutrinos with the IceCube DeepCore detector Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium ( Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Physik eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschafltichen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von B.Sc. Juan Pablo Yáñez Garza Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Olbertz Dekan der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I: Prof. Stefan Hecht, Ph.D. Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Hermann Kolanoski 2. Prof. Dr. Allan Halgren 3. Prof. Dr. Thomas Lohse Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 02.06.2014 iii Abstract The study of neutrino oscillations is an active Ąeld of research. During the last couple of decades many experiments have measured the efects of oscillations, pushing the Ąeld from the discovery stage towards an era of precision and deeper understanding of the phe- nomenon. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory, with its low energy subarray, DeepCore, has the possibility of contributing to this Ąeld. IceCube is a 1 km3 ice Cherenkov neutrino telescope buried deep in the Antarctic glacier. DeepCore, a region of denser instrumentation in the lower center of IceCube, permits the detection of neutrinos with energies as low as 10 GeV. Every year, thousands of atmospheric neutrinos around these energies leave a strong signature in DeepCore. Due to their energy and the distance they travel before being detected, these neutrinos can be used to measure the phenomenon of oscillations. This work starts with a study of the potential of IceCube DeepCore to measure neutrino oscillations in diferent channels, from which the disappearance of νµ is chosen to move forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Using Accelerators and Reactors
    NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENTS USING ACCELERATORS AND REACTORS Stanley Wojcicki Physics Department, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT These lectures emphasize neutrino oscillation experiments using accelerators and reactors. We describe past, present, and proposed experiments. A brief introduction to neutrino oscillations is given at the beginning. The technology of beams and detectors for neutrino experiments is described briefly. 1997 by Stanley Wojcicki. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Formalism of Neutrino Oscillations 2.1 Phenomenology 2.2 Classification of Oscillation Experiments 2.3 Sensitivities 3. Neutrino Beams 3.1 General Considerations 3.2 Beams from Accelerators 3.2.1 Neutrinos from Hadron Beams 3.2.2 Neutrinos from Beam Dumps 3.2.3 Other Accelerator-Produced Beams 3.3 Neutrinos from Reactors 3.4 Neutrinos from Natural Sources 4. Neutrino Detectors 4.1 Calorimeters 4.2 Tracking Detectors 4.3 Cherenkov Detectors 4.4 Radiochemical Detectors 5. νµ →ντ Oscillation Experiments (Past and Ongoing) 5.1. Disappearance Experiments 5.2 Completed Appearance Experiments 5.3 Statistical Analyses 5.4 Current Short-Baseline Program ν 6. Oscillation Experiments Involving e 6.1 Reactor Disappearance Experiments 6.1.1 Results from Completed Experiments 6.1.2 Experiments in Progress: CHOOZ and Palo Verde ν → ν 6.2µ e at Low Energies 6.2.1 LSND Experiment 6.2.2 KARMEN Experiment ν →ν 6.3 Searches for µ e at High Energies 6.3.1 BNL E776 Experiment 6.3.2 Results from CCFR Experiment ν →ν 6.3.3 NOMAD Results on µ e 7. Future Experiments 7.1 Experiments Addressing the Dark Matter Question 7.1.1 COSMOS Experiment 7.1.2 Outlook in Western Europe 7.2 Experiments Addressing the Atmospheric Neutrino Anomaly 7.2.1 K2K Experiment 7.2.2 JHF Program 7.2.3 MINOS Experiment 7.2.4 Possibilities in Western Europe 7.3 LSND Effect 7.3.1 BOONE Proposal 7.3.2 Possibilities at CERN 7.4 Solar Neutrino Anomaly––KamLAND Acknowledgments References 1 Introduction The existence of the neutrino was postulated in 1930 by W.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Charged Pion and Kaon Contributions to the T2K Neutrino Beam in Neutrino And
    Measuring the charged pion and kaon contributions to the T2K neutrino beam in neutrino and antineutrino running modes using νµ and ν¯µ CC inclusive selections in the ND280 detector Alasdair Knox Lancaster University November 14, 2018 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics at Lancaster University ii Declaration No part of this thesis has been previously submitted for the award of a higher degree. iii Abstract Tokai to Kamioka (T2K) is a long-baseline experiment designed to study neutrino oscillations using an (anti)neutrino beam. The beam is created by col- liding 30 GeV protons with a stationary graphite target. Secondary hadrons, primarily pions and kaons, are selected using magnetic horns and they subse- quently decay to final states that include neutrinos. Depending on the magnetic horn current, a neutrino or antineutrino enhanced beam can be produced. It is important to understand the flux and flavour content of the beam, in order to maximise sensitivity of the experiment. The T2K experiment uses flux models constrained by external measurement from the NA61/SHINE experiment [1] [2]. Despite this, an in-situ measurement is required to confirm the flux model derived from the NA61/SHINE data, account for time variations and any other differences between the modelled and actual beamline. This thesis used inclusive charged-current (CC) νµ andν ¯µ selections to obtain (anti)muon samples binned in reconstructed momentum. A χ2 fit, which took into account all statistical and shape-only systematic errors, was performed on the (anti)muon momentum distributions to determine the parent hadron yields.
    [Show full text]