DOCSLIB.ORG

Solid Waste Sustainability Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solid Waste Sustainability Manual Solid Waste Reduction Manual Brewers Association Solid Waste Reduction Manual Solid Waste Reduction Manual 1 table of contents Introduction . 5 Best Practices - Plastic . .27 Section 1- Segment Profi le: Solid Wastes Generated by Craft Brewers 6 Best Practices - Glass . .28 1.1 Overview of Current Solid Waste Performance and Trends in Best Practices - Aluminum and Steel . 28 the United States and Europe . 6 Best Practices - Food Waste . 29 1.2 Regulatory Drivers . 7 3.6 Concerts and Events . .30 1.3 Non-Regulatory Drivers – Image/brand, Community Ties . 8 Section 4: Onsite Waste Treatment . 32 1.4 Risks and Opportunities – Waste Reduction and Recycling . 8 4.1 Economic, Regulatory, and Image Drivers . 32 Section 2: Data Management . 10 4.2 Simplifi ed Onsite Composting . 33 2.1 Data Collection . 10 4.3 Advanced Onsite Composting . 34 2.2 Ensuring Accuracy . .12 4.4 Balers . 34 2.3 Creating Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) . 12 4.5 Waste-to-Energy Projects . 35 2.4 Setting Goals . 13 Section 5: Brewery Case Studies . 36 Section 3: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Best Practices . 15 Reduce, Reuse, Recycle . .36 3.1 Brewing . 16 Bell’s Brewery – Kalamazoo, Michigan . 36 Best Practices - Spent Grains . 16 Great Lakes Brewing Company – Cleveland, Ohio . 36 Best Practices – Diatomaceous Earth . .17 McMennamins . 36 Best Practices - Spent Yeast . 17 New Belgium Brewing Company – Fort Collins, Colorado . .37 3.2 Packaging. 19 Sierra Nevada Brewing Company – Chico, California . .37 Best Practices - Corrugated Cardboard . 19 Stone Brewing Company – Escondido, California . 37 Best Practices - Wood Pallets . 20 Onsite Treatment . 38 Best Practices - Flexibles: Shrink Wrap, Bags, Sacks . .21 Magic Hat Brewing Company – Burlington, Vermont . 38 Best Practices - Aluminum Cans . 23 Sierra Nevada Brewing Company – Chico, California . .38 Best Practices - Glass Bottles . 24 Appendix A: Tool Box . 39 3.3 Warehousing . .25 Guidance and Checklists . 39 3.4 Support Systems (Utilities) . 25 On-Line Excel-Based Tools . .39 3.5 Food Service . .26 References . 40 Best Practices - Cardboard . 27 Selected Web Links . 41 Cover photos © Shutterstock, LLC. Interior photos provided by Antea Group unless otherwise noted. Solid Waste Reduction Manual 3 acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the support of many Brewers Association members. The case studies they provided illustrate the creativity and application of sustainability best practices in the craft brewing sector. Our particular thanks go to the following core review team members, who provided invaluable insight and direction throughout the development of this document: Cheri Chastain, Sierra Nevada Brewing Company Steve Crandall, Devils Backbone Brewing Company Daniel Del Grande, Bison Brewing Tom Flores, Brewers Alley Matty Gilliland, New Belgium Brewing Company Larry Horwitz, Iron Hill Brewery Chris Opela, Brewmaster, Inc. Chris Swersey, Brewers Association Mike Utz, Boulevard Brewing Company We would also like to thank the sustainability management consulting team from Antea® Group who developed this manual and related tools, and in particular acknowledge Antea Group’s Project Leader John Stier. 4 BrewersAssociation.org introduction Craft brewers are an innovative segment of the greater This manual is a consolidated resource for effective solid brewing industry. Subsequently, it is no surprise that many waste management solutions in the craft brewers segment. craft brewers have found innovative solutions for waste Solutions offered can apply to all breweries, regardless management. These solutions reach beyond a simple of location and operational size. Guidance is provided reduction of waste to landfi ll and offi ce recycling. They lead for brewers that are just beginning to explore solid waste to operating cost reductions, new sources of revenue, and reduction programs, as well as for brewers that are looking new community and image building initiatives. to improve a well-established program. The traditional disposal option for solid waste (i.e., hauling There are checklists, resource information, and other ‘garbage’ to landfi lls) has become more expensive in visual tools throughout the manual and in Appendix A to recent years. Old landfi lls have fi lled up and closed, and the help breweries make educated solid waste management few new landfi lls that are permitted to open are located decisions. further away from populated areas, thereby leading to an increase in transportation costs to the fi nal disposal area. Disclaimer: the following information provided constitute Breweries, like many businesses, are fi nding that reducing suggestions that may or may not fi t the need of each the amount of waste generated can lead to signifi cantly brewery specifi cally. Brewers should proceed with caution reduced operating costs. In addition, keeping recyclable when implementing any new programs. It is not guaranteed materials out of the landfi lls can create a signifi cant source that operating under the guidance of this manual will lead to of revenue. any particular outcome or result. The information is structured as a pathway to effective and sustainable solid waste management from start to fi nish, and is organized into fi ve sections: 1. Segment Profi le: A discussion of solid waste 3. Best Practices: Guidance on best practices to generation and recycling trends, where to reduce, reuse and recycle waste within the fi nd information on regulatory drivers, exam- craft brewers segment with a focus on oppor- ples of non-regulatory drivers, and risks and tunities in the brewing process, packaging, opportunities for cost savings. warehousing, utilities, and food service/events. 2. Data Management: A guide to identifying 4. Onsite Waste Treatment: An overview of drivers for the components of brewery waste streams, onsite waste treatment and example projects. establishing key performance indicators and goals, managing solid waste data, and 5. Case Studies: Examples of successful waste benchmarking waste reduction progress management and waste treatment pro- toward goals. grams used by craft brewers. Solid Waste Reduction Manual 5 section one Segment Profi le: Solid Wastes Generated by Craft Brewers There are four general solid waste streams produced It will also review regulatory drivers for solid waste within the craft brewers segment: brewing process wastes, management, such as mandatory recycling laws. Several packaging wastes, food service wastes, and wastes non-regulatory drivers will also be highlighted, including generated during special events, such as concerts or recognition of excellence in solid waste management, festivals. Throughout the manual, components of these which strengthens public image, consumer opinion, waste streams will be discussed, as well as how to effectively community ties, and employee morale. quantify waste generation and disposal. This manual will also present best practices for waste reduction. Section 1 concludes with a brief overview of the risks and opportunities in solid waste management. Four Main Solid Waste Generation Processes in Breweries 1.1 Overview of Current Solid Waste Performance PACKAGING FOOD SERVICE CONCERTS/ BREWING EVENTS and Trends in the United States and Europe In 2010, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) published an annual Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Spent Grains Cardboard/Paper Food Food Report. This report outlines current waste disposal quantities Spend DE Wood Pallets Cardboard Cardboard and trends throughout the United States, and provides insight into some brewery-specifi c waste streams that Spent Yeast Aluminum/Metal Aluminum/Metal Aluminum/Metal demonstrate a national movement of improved recycling Spent Trub Glass Glass Glass habits. Highlights from the report are shown below. Plastic Plastic Plastic U.S. EPA MSW Report Highlights (2010) Before evaluating brewery-specifi c waste streams, this • Over 250 million tons of waste was generated in section will review some basic trends associated with waste the United States: 34.1% was recycled, up from stream components. Understanding these trends will enable 28.6% in 2000. brewers to make well informed decisions. • 13.9% of the municipal solid waste stream consisted of food scraps. 6 BrewersAssociation.org Segment Profi le: Solid Wastes Generated by Craft Brewers • 49.6% of generated aluminum beer and soda environmentally friendly packaging. Using lighter weight cans were recovered. materials and boosting the amount of recycled materials in • 41.4% of generated glass beer and soft drink packaging are just some ways breweries are improving their bottles were recovered. waste management processes. • 71.3% of paper and paperboard used for packaging was recovered. REUSE: In 2010, 24.5% of packaging in their segment was returnable bottles and 20.7% was kegs. Returnable glass bottles and metal kegs can be reused and require less reliance on new Americans are taking advantage of recycling programs and manufactured materials. Returnable bottles are a negligible are more conscious of their waste disposal, as compared to just part of the beer industry in the U.S. today, and it would take a decade ago. In 2010, 71% of the U.S. was served by at least signifi cant retailer and distributor agreement to resuscitate this one recycling program, diverting over 85 million tons of waste practice. from landfi lls – resources to be repurposed for another use. RECYCLE: In 2010, 24.7% of their packaging was metal The preferred method of dealing with waste is reducing its (aluminum or steel)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rethinking the Waste Hierachy
    R ethinking the Waste H i erarchy Environmental ASSESSMENT INSTITUTE MARCH 2005 INSTITUT FOR MILJ0VURDERING E nvironmental Assessment Institute Reference no.: 2002-2204-007 ISBN.: 87-7992-032-2 Editors: Clemen Rasmussen and Dorte Vigs0 Written by: Clemen Rasmussen (project manager), Dorte Vigs0, Frank Ackerman, Richard Porter, David Pearce, Elbert Dijkgraaf and Herman Vollebergh. Published: March 2005 Version: 1.1 ©2005, Environmental Assessment Institute For further information please contact: Environmental Assessment Institute Linnesgade 18 DK -1361 Copenhagen Phone: +45 7226 5800 Fax: +45 7226 5839 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.imv.dk E nvironmental Assessment Institute Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy March 2005 Recommendations A number of specific recommendations for achieving cost-effective waste policies can be made based on both the US experience presented by Ackerman and Porter and on the analysis of European waste management presented by Pearce and Dijkgraaf & Vollebergh. The results of this project relate to both the target setting and the regulatory implementation of waste policy in the EU. The main recommendations for future waste policies in the EU and Member States are: ■ The waste hierarchy must be considered a very general and flexible guideline for formulating waste policies. What is environmentally desirable is not always a preferred solution, when considered from a socio economic perspective. The reason is that some environmental benefits may come at a comparably so­ cially high cost. The marginal costs and benefits will vary depending on mate­ rial and locality. It is recommended that social costs and benefits of new recy­ cling schemes should be analysed and that a critical assessment be made on to determine if further steps are in fact socially desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Waste Master Plan Source Reduction Discussion II
    John Fischer February 20, 2019 Master Plan Status & Schedule Update Spring, summer 2019: write draft plan Fall 2019: release public hearing draft Late 2020: publish final plan Upcoming Meetings March 14th C&D Subcommittee March 19th: Organics Subcommittee April 25th: Solid Waste Advisory Committee June 18th: C&D Suncommittee Source Reduction Strategies Identified at Jan. 17, 2019 Meeting Extended producer responsibility (EPR) PAYT and source reduction Right to repair The sharing economy Textile reuse Commercial waste reduction C&D source reduction Furniture refurbishment Resource management contracting Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Enforce cardboard manufacturer responsibility to promote a closed loop system. Hold producers responsible if their packaging is not recyclable. Manufacturers should pay for people to send packaging back to them. Packaging responsibility should drive producers to think more about their packaging, which could drive source reduction. Support paint and electronics EPR bills filed this session. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Discussion question: What are the most important products or packaging for which we should establish EPR systems? PAYT and Source Reduction Promote PAYT within a framework of other initiatives that enable source reduction, e.g. a Library of Things. PAYT creates awareness, which can affect consumer behavior. PAYT and Source Reduction Discussion question: What steps should MassDEP take to increase/improve PAYT program adoption? Right to Repair Right to repair laws could help create new small repair businesses. Producers would be required to share all schematics of how a product works, which allows other businesses to repair the products, not just the original producers. Right to Repair Discussion question: What product categories provide the best repair business opportunities? The Sharing Economy Establish baseline of current reuse activities: identify the impact of systems such as Craigslist, Freecycle, Buy Nothing Facebook groups, and NextDoor.com.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consumer's Handbook for Reducing Solid Waste
    United States EPA 530-K-96-003 Environmental Protection September 1996 Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5305W) The Consumer’s Handbook for Reducing Solid Waste Reduction Reuse Recycle Response This booklet describes how people can help solve a growing prob- lem...garbage! Individual consumers can help alleviate America’s mounting trash problem by making environmentally aware decisions about everyday things like shopping and caring for the lawn. Like the story that says cats have nine lives, so do many of the items we use every day. Empty cans and jars can be reused to store many items, such as nails or thumbtacks. The baking soda bought to bake a cake also can be used to scrub kitchen counters. The container that began its life as a plastic milk jug can be washed and reused to water plants, create an arts and crafts project, or be transformed into a bird feeder. Eventually, the milk jug can be recycled to create a new plastic product. Reusing products is just one way to cut down on what we throw away. This booklet outlines many practical steps to reduce the amount and toxicity of garbage. These aren’t the only steps that can be taken to reduce waste, but they’re a good start. L 1 Reduction Solid Waste Source Reduction A Basic Solution General Overview of What’s in America’s Trash Metals Yard Trimmings Source reduction is a basic solu- other management options that tion to the garbage glut: less waste deal with trash after it is already means less of a waste problem.
    [Show full text]
  • RCRA, Superfund & EPCRA Call Center Training Module
    United States Solid Waste and EPA530-K-02-019I Environmental Protection Emergency Response October 2001 Agency (5305W) RCRA, Superfund & EPCRA Call Center Training Module Introduction to: RCRA Solid Waste Programs Updated October 2001 DISCLAIMER This document was developed by Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. under contract 68-W-01-020 to EPA. It is intended to be used as a training tool for Call Center specialists and does not represent a statement of EPA policy. The information in this document is not by any means a complete representation of EPA s regulations or policies. This document is used only in the capacity of the Call Center training and is not used as a reference tool on Call Center calls. The Call Center revises and updates this document as regulatory program areas change. The information in this document may not necessarily reflect the current position of the Agency. This document is not intended and cannot be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. RCRA, Superfund & EPCRA Call Center Phone Numbers: National toll-free (outside of DC area) (800) 424-9346 Local number (within DC area) (703) 412-9810 National toll-free for the hearing impaired (TDD) (800) 553-7672 The Call Center is open from 9 am to 5 pm Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays. RCRA SOLID WASTE PROGRAMS CONTENTS 1. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 2. Municipal Solid Waste ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 EPA's Integrated Waste Management Hierarchy .................................... 3 2.2 Source Reduction ........................................................................................... 4 2.3 Recycling ........................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Combustion ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Petstar PET Bottle-To-Bottle Recycling System, a Zero-Waste Circular Economy Business Model
    PetStar PET bottle-to-bottle recycling system, a zero-waste circular economy business model Jaime Cámara-Creixell1 and Carlos Scheel-Mayenberger2 Abstract The lack of environmental awareness in society, especially in developing countries, combined with inefficient waste handling systems have caused mil- lions of PET bottles to end up in landfills, losing their original value. In the worst cases, the bottles mishandled by consumers enter natural systems gen- erating significant negative externalities such as the pollution of soil and wa- ter, with the possibility of reaching the oceans. In general, the plastic recycling industry in undeveloped economies is highly dependent on the participation of a broad social group known as scav- engers, whose role is very valuable for the supply chain, although it is per- formed under very difficult conditions and usually operates as part of the in- formal economy. Maintaining the sustainability of the three actors involved in the industry--the environment, society and business--requires a different business model in which all actors must participate and produce a more in- clusive added value. PetStar is a company that has designed and implemented a circular econ- omy business model for PET bottles that is trying to achieve a dream for the recycling industry: to disengage the recycled bottle from virgin resources, avoiding the conversion of the packaging to waste, and operate a perennial cycle in the use of the packaging. The PetStar sustainable business model is presented, explaining how it works and how it creates a sustainable cycle that is economically feasible and competitive, environmentally resilient and so- cially shared among one of the poorest and most informal sectors, the scav- enger and collector communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Policy Recommendations Report Submitted December 21 2020
    Statewide Commission on Recycling Markets and Curbside Recycling Policy Recommendations Due Jan. 1, 2021, Submitted Dec. 21, 2020 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 3 Origins ........................................................................................................................ 5 Forward ....................................................................................................................... 6 First, Let’s Stop the Fires! ............................................................................................ 9 Second, Keep it Clean and Green ............................................................................. 11 Getting There from Here: Not less than 75% of Solid Waste Generated be Source Reduced, Recycled, or Composted ........................................................................... 13 Other Proposals ....................................................................................................... 16 Market Development Recommendations ................................................................... 18 Waste Prevention ....................................................................................................... 20 Food Waste Prevention .......................................................................................... 20 Food Rescue .......................................................................................................... 21 On-Site and Community
    [Show full text]
  • King County Ecoconsumer: "Transparent Answers on Recycling Glass," from the Seattle Times
    Winner of Eight Pulitzer Prizes Originally published Friday, May 6, 2011 at 5:25 PM EcoConsumer Transparent answers on recycling glass The ins and outs of glass recycling aren't always so clear. Glass bottles get broken when they're recycled, but you don't want to break... By Tom Watson Special to The Seattle Times The ins and outs of glass recycling aren't always so clear. Top comments Hide / Show comments Glass bottles get broken when they're recycled, but you don't want to break them too soon. Other types of glass should not be Read all 2 comments > Post a comment > recycled with glass bottles. Refilling returnable glass bottles makes sense environmentally, but beverage companies rarely do it anymore. Glass recycling is a local success story nonetheless, even as it illustrates the complexities of modern recycling. Q: I've heard that broken pieces from a glass bottle or jar should not go in the recycling bin, but why is that? A: Broken glass in your bin could pose a safety hazard to recycling workers. If you break a bottle, those shards should be carefully bagged and put in the garbage. Q: So what exactly happens to my bottles when I recycle them? A: Many glass bottles collected regionally become wine bottles at a bottle-making facility in South Seattle. Opened in 1931, this plant is now called Verallia and is owned by the French company Saint-Gobain. The first stop for those old bottles, however, is usually the 2-year-old eCullet processing plant next door to Verallia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Path to PET Bottle Recycling Made Easier with the Avery Dennison Cleanflake™ Portfolio. Label Material Advances Allow Brand Owners to Improve Recyclability
    The Path to PET Bottle Recycling Made Easier with the Avery Dennison CleanFlake™ Portfolio. Label material advances allow brand owners to improve recyclability Advances by Avery Dennison have leveled the playing field for PET recyclability and shelf-impact. Traditionally there has been a trade-off between the two; however, the Avery Dennison CleanFlake™ Portfolio is designed specifically for the PET (polyethylene terephthalate) recycling stream. PET is a popular plastic package for food and non-food products because of its strength, thermo-stability and transparency. Bottle-to-bottle recycling reduces landfills, enables up-cycling into food-grade rPET and capitalizes on the renewable energy in a PET bottle. Brand owners, packaging designers, raw material suppliers, converters, retailers, consumers and waste management companies collectively impact sustainability. While the overall goal is to make it easier to recover more materials, brand owners look beyond package design. They recognize sustainability can offer a significant point of differentiation as retailers’ demands and consumer awareness about the environment and natural resources carry increasing influence towards the brands that are put on store shelves and in shopping bags. “NAPCOR applauds Avery Dennison and its customers for addressing a critical impediment to the efficient recycling of PET containers,” said Mike Schedler, National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) Director of Technology. “The popularity of pressure-sensitive labels makes it imperative that they be successfully removed as part of the standard PET reclamation process to increase their recyclability. We hope other label manufacturers and brand owners follow Avery Dennison’s lead.” Promoting Sustainability, Creating Shelf Appeal and Capturing Share Whether it’s a private label or a national brand, consumers will only behind its latest pressure-sensitive label constructions, which are spend about 2.5 seconds at the shelf deciding what product to designed to improve recycling efficiencies and the overall quality of buy.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 4. FUTURE VISIONING the Purpose of This Chapter Is to Outline the Goals and Objectives of This RSWMP Document
    CHAPTER 4. FUTURE VISIONING The purpose of this chapter is to outline the goals and objectives of this RSWMP document. Based on stakeholder input, analysis results, and a review of existing programs and practices related to regional solid waste management, a series of goals and subgoals was created to guide the TCOG Region over the next twenty years. These goals were periodically reviewed with the NRAC, TCOG staff and were further refined based on feedback received. A particular focus on waste minimization, cooperative commitment, public education, and outreach, and recommendations for a compost program were a primary focus during the development of these goals. Goals In total, there are four primary goals intended to guide the Region’s solid waste management practices over the next twenty years. Each primary goal is also supported by a series of corresponding subgoals, which outline more specific recommendations to incrementally achieve primary goals. Primary goals include the following: 1. Ensure adequate levels of transportation and disposal capabilities throughout the region. 2. Develop local programs in source reduction, waste minimization, reuse, recycling, and composting in order to conserve disposal capacity and resources. 3. Develop programs to assist regional and local entities in controlling and stemming illegal and improper disposal practices. 4. Develop cost-effective, efficient, and environmentally suitable solid waste management systems throughout the region. These four functional goals have served as the guiding principles for the Region since the original RSWMP was adopted in 1993. Upon review of stakeholder feedback and analysis results, these goals were deemed appropriate to continue functioning as guiding principles for the Region.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Sustainable Packaging Study
    2018 Sustainable Packaging Study Comprehensive results of the 2018 Sustainable Packaging Study conducted by Packaging Digest in partnership with the Sustainable Packaging Coalition. 1 CONTENTS 3 Introduction 4 Key Insights 6 Part 1: Plastic Packaging Attitudes & Challenges 6 Current Climate 13 Bio-based Plastics 16 Recycling 21 Bans / Regulations 26 Part 2: Actions Companies Are Taking 31 Part 3: SPC Member Differences 37 Part 4: Recommendations 38 Part 5: Methodology & Demographics 41 Part 6: List of Charts Co-author Adam Gendell is Associate Director of the Sustainable Packaging Coalition, where he has worked since 2010. His work focuses on helping SPC members and the broader packaging community identify and understand sustainability considerations and opportunities in packaging. 434-202-4790; [email protected] Co-author Lisa McTigue Pierce is Executive Editor of Packaging Digest. Since 1982, Pierce has been a journalist covering packaging news, emerging trends and technological innovations for consumer packaged goods and healthcare products. 630-481-1422; [email protected] 2 INTRODUCTION Packaging Digest has been partnering with the Sustainable Packaging Coalition since 2007 on this benchmarking study into sustainability and packaging. Each year, we ask questions about various aspects of general packaging sustainability. Some questions are the same every year to give us a historical picture of where the industry is—and where it is shifting. But each year we also add new questions around the hot topics du jour. This year, we focused on plastic packaging sustainability because it has captured so much attention around the world from consumers, organizations and governments today. In this detailed report, we’ll first provide some context by talking about the current climate of plastic packaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Producer Responsibility: the Next Phase of the US Recycling Movement
    Extended Producer Responsibility: The Next Phase of the US Recycling Movement A Review of the Take It Back! Pacific Rim: Forging New Alliances for Waste Reduction Conference, held February 28 – March 1, 2000 in Los Angeles, California. The conference was produced by Raymond Communications, Inc. and Huls Environmental, L.L.C. and sponsored by The City of Los Angeles, California Integrated Waste Management Board, GTE Recycling, E-tech Products, Inc., and Waste Management of Orange County. By Neil N. Seldman Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) 2425 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 (202)-232-4108 Neil Seldman is the director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance’s (ILSR’s) Waste to Wealth Program. Under a grant from the Flora Foundation in San Francisco, California, ILSR will be exploring extended producer responsibility strategies and other rules that help close the loop locally. The U.S. recycling movement once again is flexing its muscles, this time in the direction of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). EPR proponents see discarded products and packages are an “unfunded mandate.” While some see unfunded mandates only as federal dictates that force spending at the local level, EPR advocates see unfunded mandates as corporate dictates that force local governments and small businesses to spend $43.5 billion annually for handling the materials that manufacturers so carelessly let loose upon the land. The EPR concept originated in Europe in the last decade, but now is emerging in Central and South America and Asia as well; paralleling the global path of the product and packaging manufacturers against whom the movement is aimed.
    [Show full text]
  • Consideration of the Solid Waste Hierarchy
    CHAPTER 4.0 CONSIDERATION OF THE SOLID WASTE HIERARCHY 4.0 CONSIDERATION OF THE SOLID WASTE HIERARCHY 4.1 The Solid Waste Hierarchy The Code of Virginia (Section 10.1-1411) and the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations (9 VAC 20-130-10 et seq.) require local governments to develop a comprehensive and integrated solid waste management plan. The Plan, at a minimum, must consider and address all components of the solid waste hierarchy for all types of nonhazardous solid waste generated in the region or locality (Figure 4-1). The solid waste management hierarchy ranks methods of handling solid waste from most preferred methods of source reduction, reuse, and recycling, in that order, to least preferred methods of energy/resource recovery/incineration and landfilling. Figure 4-1: Solid Waste Management Hierarchy (9 VAC 20-130-30) Source Reduction Most Preferred Reuse Recycling Resource Recovery Least Preferred Incineration Landfilling The Plan must provide an integrated solid waste management strategy that considers all elements of waste management during generation, collection, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal. Finally, the Plan must describe how the mandatory recycling rate of 25% of the total municipal solid waste (MSW) generated annually will be met or exceeded (9 VAC 20-130-120 B & C). No single waste management approach is appropriate for all communities. Integrated solid waste management uses a combination of techniques and approaches to handle targeted portions of the waste stream. It is important to realize that the portions of the hierarchy interact with each other and that change on one level will impact or influence another level.
    [Show full text]