CECA Implementation: a First Look

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CECA Implementation: a First Look ISAS Working Paper No. 9 – Date: 7 February 2006 (All rights reserved) Institute of South Asian Studies Hon Sui Sen Memorial Library Building 1 Hon Sui Sen Drive (117588) Tel: 68746179 Fax: 67767505 Email: [email protected] Wesbite: www.isas.nus.edu.sg CECA Implementation: A First Look Alka Chadha• Introduction The Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) was signed between India and Singapore on 29 June 2005 to promote trade and investments between the two countries. For the first time, India has signed an all-encompassing economic pact with any country so as to benefit from gains through trade and investment flows in areas of mutual interest. This is also the first time that India has notified a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) under Article XXIV of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). While, the Agreements relating to goods and services are in accordance with the provisions under the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Agreement on financial services goes beyond the WTO commitments for both India and Singapore. The idea for a comprehensive economic agreement between India and Singapore developed from discussions between the then Prime Minister of India Atal Behari Vajpayee and the then Prime Minister of Singapore Goh Chok Tong in August 2002. A joint study group was set up to draft the working of the CECA and it submitted a report in April 2003 that recommended an integrated package of agreements between India and Singapore including free trade in goods and services and investments. The CECA is a classic example of proving that the disparity in size does not matter when it comes to economic cooperation. Despite the asymmetry between two partners, since Singapore is a city-state and India, a sub-continental country, the CECA holds promises for both the countries. On the one hand, Singapore is expected to serve as a gateway for India to access the vibrant markets of East and Southeast Asia. On the other hand, India is likely to provide Singapore with its expertise and skill in high-technology areas like IT, electronics and pharmaceuticals, besides being a large market. Even though there is a requirement for value addition according to the rules-of-origin provisions, the strategic advantage to India from being a part of the East Asia architecture will outweigh the trade-related handicaps, if any. • Ms Alka Chadha is a Research Associate at the Institute of South Asian Studies (ISAS), an autonomous research institute within the National University of Singapore. She can be contacted at [email protected]. The writer would like to thank Assoc Prof Tan Tai Yong, Acting Director, ISAS, for the guidance and invaluable suggestions while writing this paper. She would also wish to thank Dr S. Narayan, Head of Research, ISAS, for his helpful comments. Key Provisions Singapore is a highly trade-dependent economy with a strategic location within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) offering a combined market of over 500 million people. Its trade to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio at over 300 percent is the highest in the world. Free trade is a key tenet of the foreign economic policy of Singapore. Since Singapore is a free port and offers entry for all Indian products at zero duty, it will help to build supply chains by taking advantage of Singapore as a trading and entrepot hub for regions in East and South-east Asia. The agreement has built in safeguards providing rules of origin that require a minimum value addition of 40 percent to ensure that only the goods, which are actually manufactured in Singapore and India, benefit under the CECA. On the part of India, custom duties on 506 products, accounting for 80 percent of total imports from Singapore, were scrapped from 1 August 2005. These include duties on electronics, electrical instrumentation, pharmaceuticals and publishing products. In addition to this, duties would be eliminated in phases by 10, 25, 50, 75 and 100 per cent on 2,202 tariff lines by 1 April 1, 2009 and on another 2,407 lines also by 1 August 2009. A negative list comprising 6,551 tariff lines has been retained mostly for agricultural and textile items with no duty concessions. Singapore will also grant duty free access to Indian beer. The product until now attracted US$ 0.8 per litre. Further, the CECA incorporates a double taxation agreement in order to avoid double taxation of income in India and Singapore. India has amended the Double Taxation Avoidance (DTA) Agreement of 1994 to provide for sharing of information and improved tax treatment on the lines of a similar treaty with Mauritius wherein Singaporean firms can invest in India without paying capital gains tax on profits earned there. Accordingly, capital gains earned by a Singapore resident from the sale of shares in India will be liable to tax only in Singapore and since Singapore does not impose capital gains tax, residents of Singapore will face no such taxes for investments in India. As a part of the Agreement on financial services, India has granted three major Singapore banks – Development Bank of Singapore (DBS), Overseas Chinese Banking Corporation (OCBC) and United Overseas Bank (UOB) – the right to establish wholly-owned subsidiaries in India. These banks will be accorded “national treatment” equivalent to Indian banks by giving them the operational and functional autonomy of setting up new branches subject to adherence of prudential norms as mandated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Reciprocally, Indian banks, such as the State Bank of India (SBI) that is a public sector bank and the Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India (ICICI) that is the country’s largest private sector bank, will qualify for national treatment in Singapore. This would allow them facilities for retail banking like electronic fund transfer and setting up of automated teller machines (ATMs) and clearances rather than just corporate banking. Both the banks have submitted an application to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), Singapore’s central bank, to seek licences that would allow them to offer services from 25 premises, including branches and ATMs. Interestingly, at the recently held 6th India-European Union Summit, Chief Executive of Standard Chartered Bank group Mervyn Davies made a plea for an agreement on the lines of the CECA between India and the European Union after witnessing the success of banking operations of Singaporean banks in India. 2 Some Early Effects Trade A study of destinations for India’s exports shows that developing economies are fast emerging as important destinations in an environment of rising South-South trade. According to the RBI Bulletin (November 2005), Latin America has emerged as the fastest growing region for India’s exports during April-August 2005, followed by Africa, East Asia and the European Union. Countries like Singapore, China, Korea, Hong Kong, Netherlands, France and the United Kingdom have become the major markets for India’s exports. Table 1: Destination of India's Exports (April-August) (US $ million) Group/Country (1) (2) (3) Percentage Percentage 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 variation (2)/(1) variation (3)/(2) P E.U. 5014.2 6215.8 7890.6 24.0 26.9 Canada 282.5 321.4 363.5 13.8 13.1 U.S.A. 4224.3 5254.2 6003.4 24.4 14.3 Australia 215.5 255.4 306.4 18.5 20.0 Japan 656.3 703.6 881.9 7.2 25.4 Latin America 517.1 680.0 1236.4 31.5 81.8 OPEC 3007.4 4580.8 5077.0 52.3 10.8 Russia 274.8 235.5 257.9 -14.3 9.5 Bangladesh 651.3 572.2 587.7 -12.1 2.7 Maldives 10.9 15.8 26.0 45.6 64.3 Nepal 235.2 331.3 251.7 40.9 -24.0 Pakistan 58.8 210.2 240.5 257.2 14.5 Sri Lanka 517.6 483.6 795.8 -6.6 64.6 China 753.9 1264.2 2017.2 67.7 59.6 Hong Kong 1146.2 1375.3 1805.9 20.0 31.3 Malaysia 312.4 440.1 374.4 40.9 -14.9 Singapore 546.8 1380.0 2313.0 152.4 67.6 South Korea 227.9 368.2 569.2 61.5 54.6 Thailand 266.1 292.5 380.0 9.9 29.9 Africa 1109.6 1425.1 2118.9 28.4 48.7 Source: Reserve Bank of India Bulletin, November 2005. Note: P- Provisional Table 1 clearly shows the tilt in Indian exports towards Singapore, having more than doubled from 2003-04 to 2004-05. The CECA negotiations during this period could have generated awareness about the potential of Singapore as a trading partner. In 2005-06, Singapore has become the fourth largest market for India's exports, after the European Union, the United States and OPEC. In fact, in the category of manufactured goods, engineering goods, led by transport equipments, metals and manufactures, machinery and parts and chemicals, were the key drivers of export growth during April-May 2005. Exports of transport equipments, accounting for about one-fourth of the expansion in manufacturing exports, was propelled by demand from France and Italy in Europe and Singapore, Korea and Thailand in East Asia. 3 Figure 1: India’s Trade with Singapore (US $ million) Figure 1, taken from the RBI Bulletin (September 2005), depicts the surge in India's exports to Singapore, which have accelerated from about US$1 billion during the mid-1990s to US$3.8 billion in 2004-05. During April-May 2005-06, India's exports to Singapore posted a growth of 88 percent on year-on-year basis, the highest growth among India's major trading partners.
Recommended publications
  • Ten Reasons Why the Global Textile Industry Demands Quality Cotton
    BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE FOR AN INTERWOVEN WORLD TheThe CompetitiveCompetitive Edge:Edge: TenTen ReasonsReasons WhyWhy TheThe GlobalGlobal TextileTextile IndustryIndustry DemandsDemands QualityQuality CottonCotton Robert P. Antoshak President Globecot, Inc. BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE FOR AN INTERWOVEN WORLD Why Does Quality Cotton Matter? There are ten factors that impact today’s global textile industry and force mills to consider quality cotton … BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE FOR AN INTERWOVEN WORLD 1. Textile Industry Consolidation 2. Continuing Overcapacity 3. Export Competition 4. Consolidation in Raw Materials 5. Shifting Investment Flows 6. Slowing Growth in Global Market 7. Consolidation of Retail Sector 8. Government Policy 9. The Impact of China 10.The Impact of China’s Competitors BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE FOR AN INTERWOVEN WORLD Reason 1: TextileTextile IndustryIndustry ConsolidationConsolidation • Decline of U.S., E.U. industries • Significant reorientation of industries in Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Hong Kong • Shifting of investment resources away from U.S. and E.U. in favor of China, India, Vietnam, etc. BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE FOR AN INTERWOVEN WORLD GlobalGlobal ProductionProduction ofof CottonCotton YarnYarn 25000 20000 Asia/Oceania 15000 Europe 10000 Africa Americas 5000 1,000 Metric Tons 0 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '06 Source: ICAC BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE FOR AN INTERWOVEN WORLD GlobalGlobal ProductionProduction ofof CottonCotton FabricsFabrics 14000 12000 10000 Asia/Oceania 8000 Europe 6000 Africa Americas 4000 1,000 Metric Tons 2000 0 '80 '85
    [Show full text]
  • Sunil Sharma
    Visiting Scholar, Institute for International Economic Policy Elliott School of International Affairs, Suite 502 The George Washington University Washington, DC 20052, USA. Mobile: +(1) 202-600-6345 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] SUNIL SHARMA Education Ph.D. (Economics), Cornell University, USA, 1986. M.A. (Economics), Cornell University, USA, 1983. M.A. (Economics), Delhi School of Economics, India, 1980. B.A. (Honors), St. Stephen’s College, Delhi University, India, 1978. Professional Visiting Scholar, Institute of International Economic Policy, Elliott School of International Affairs, The George Washington University, 2018- Experience Assistant Director, Research Department, International Monetary Fund, 2015-2018 . Research on financial market development, regulation, and macro-financial issues. Oversaw and contributed to the review of IMF papers on financial policy issues. Director, IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute (STI), Singapore, 2006-2014 . Managed STI operations, including curriculum, teaching, administration, budget, IT, personnel, outreach, and liaising with governments in the Asia-Pacific region. Ex officio Secretary of the STI Executive Committee; Coordinate STI operations with the Singapore government (Monetary Authority of Singapore, Ministry of Foreign Affairs), IMF’s Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific in Tokyo, and IMF Headquarters in Washington D.C. Co-managed the Finance program of the IMF Institute. Designed and taught a 5-day seminar on Selected Issues in the Evolving Financial Regulatory Framework at the STI (2011-13). Designed and taught a 5-day seminar on Mortgage Markets and Financial Stability at the regional institutes in Vienna (2009-13) and Singapore (2008-13). Organized the First STI Meeting on Training (April 27-28, 2006) in Singapore to start a dialogue on the STI curriculum and training events with the directors of training at central banks and finance ministries in the Asia-Pacific region.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Competitiveness Report Singapore Competitiveness Report 2009 Report Competitiveness Singapore
    Singapore Competitiveness Report Singapore Competitiveness Report 2009 foreword by Michael E. Porter Harvard Business School Christian Ketels Ashish Lall Neo Boon Siong with research assistance from Stevenson Q. Yu LEE KUAN YEW SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY Susan Chung Lai Ling NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 469C Bukit Timah Road, Oei Tiong Ham Building, Singapore 259772 www.lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/ACI b SINGAPORE COMPETITIVENESS REPORT Singapore Competitiveness Report foreword by Michael E. Porter Harvard Business School Christian Ketels Ashish Lall Neo Boon Siong with research assistance from Stevenson Q. Yu Susan Chung Lai Ling SINGAPORE COMPETITIVENESS REPORT 1 2 SINGAPORE COMPETITIVENESS REPORT Table of Contents Foreword ...............................................................................................................................7 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................9 Chapter 1: Introduction Singapore’s Competitiveness Challenge in 2009 ..........................................................................................19 The Report’s Conceptual Approach ..............................................................................................................19 Report Outline ............................................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 2: Economic Performance Standard of Living .........................................................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis
    BULLETIN OF ECONOMIC THEORY AND ANALYSIS Journal homepage: http://www.betajournals.org The Effects of the IMF’s Quota and Governance Reforms on Turkey Z. Tuğrul Göver To cite this article: Göver, Z., T. (2018). The Effects of the IMF’s Quota and Governance Reforms on Turkey. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 3(1), 1-34. Received: 25 Dec 2017 Accepted: 26 Sep 2018 Published online: 30 Sep 2018 ©All right reserved βετα Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis Volume III, Issue 1, pp. 1-33, 2018 http://www.betajournals.org The Effects of the IMF’s Quota and Governance Reforms on Turkey Z. Tuğrul GÖVERa aUndersecretariat of Treasury, TURKEY ABSTRACT Turkey became a member of the IMF in 1947 and has resorted to IMF sources many times since then. Turkey signed 19 Stand-By Arrangements with the IMF when faced with liquidity problems. Several studies have already provided detailed information about the history and evolution of the relationship between the IMF and Turkey. However, we have not come across studies about the reform efforts carried out by the IMF since 2006 and their effects on Turkey. The IMF reforms completed during the 2006-2016 period positively affected Turkey's voting power, the amount of potential financing it could use, and its representation at the Executive Board. Yet, the conditionality principle, which applies to all countries, remains valid for Turkey as Keywords well. Therefore, it would benefit Turkey to explore alternative ways in which it can IMF, Global obtain potential financing on more flexible terms than the IMF. The objectives of the Financial Safety Net, conditionality study are to examine the reform efforts carried out by the IMF during the period 2006- 2016 and their impact on Turkey and, to discuss the possibility of obtaining funds from JEL Classification other components of the Global Financial Safety Net for Turkey F33, F36, F53 CONTACT Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Capital Flows: the Case of Singapore
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Chow, Hwee Kwan Working Paper Managing capital flows: The case of Singapore ADBI Discussion Paper, No. 86 Provided in Cooperation with: Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo Suggested Citation: Chow, Hwee Kwan (2008) : Managing capital flows: The case of Singapore, ADBI Discussion Paper, No. 86, Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53494 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Managing Capital Flows: The Case of Singapore Hwee Kwan Chow February 2008 ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 86 Hwee Kwan Chow was commissioned by the ADBI to provide a country study of Singapore for the project Managing Capital Flows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Economic Crisis and Its Implications for Asian Economic Cooperation
    Policy Studies 55 The Global Economic Crisis and Its Implications for Asian Economic Cooperation Michael G. Plummer About the East-West Center The East-West Center is an education and research organization estab- lished by the U.S. Congress in 1960 to strengthen relations and under- standing among the peoples and nations of Asia, the Pacific, and the United States. The Center contributes to a peaceful, prosperous, and just Asia Pacific community by serving as a vigorous hub for cooperative research, education, and dialogue on critical issues of common concern to the Asia Pacific region and the United States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. government, with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, foundations, corporations, and the gov- ernments of the region. The Global Economic Crisis and Its Implications for Asian Economic Cooperation Policy Studies 55 The Global Economic Crisis and Its Implications for Asian Economic Cooperation Michael G. Plummer Copyright © 2009 by the East-West Center The Global Economic Crisis and Its Implications for Asian Economic Cooperation by Michael G. Plummer ISSN 1547-1349 (print) and 1547-1330 (electronic) ISBN 978-1-932728-84-2 (print) and 978-1-932728-85-9 (electronic) East-West Center 1601 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96848-1601 Tel: 808.944.7111 [email protected] EastWestCenter.org/policystudies The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Center. Hard copies of publications in the series are available through Amazon.com. In
    [Show full text]
  • Reform of IMF Quota Shares and Voting Shares: a Missed Opportunity
    April 8, 2008 Ralph C. Bryant Reform of IMF Quota Shares and Voting Shares: A Missed Opportunity The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund approved on March 28th a recommended set of reforms for IMF quotas and voting shares and asked the Governors of the 185 member nations to vote by the end of April 2008 to approve the resolution embodying the proposed reforms.1 The Managing Director of the IMF, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, described the proposed reforms as "a very important step." The package does contain modest improvements in existing governance procedures for the IMF. But the improvements fall very far short in addressing the challenges facing the IMF in its hoped-for evolution toward a global institution with more balanced and inclusive representation and voting power. The most serious failing of the proposed reforms is the omission of any changes in the composition and size of the IMF’s Executive Board. Throughout the discussions leading up to the March 28th agreement, all questions about the size of the Executive Board and the disproportionate dominance of European "chairs" were taken off the table completely. Yet the composition and procedures of the Executive Board are the aspects of IMF governance most in need of reform. 1 See IMF Press Release No. 08/64, March 28, 2008; and the document "Reform of Quota and Voice in the International Monetary Fund – Report of the Executive Board to the Board of Governors." March 28, 2008. Both documents are available on the IMF website. 2 The proposed revised formula for calculating the presumptive quota and voting shares of members is an especially weak component of the proposed package.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Trade Agreements and the Formalisation of Economic
    Regional Economic Integration in East Asia and Japan Shujiro URATA Waseda University I. Introduction East Asia achieved rapid economic growth for the last several decades, although there are variations among them in terms of the rate of economic growth. For example, compared to developing countries, Japan, which achieved high level of economic development, registered low economic growth. By contrast, China achieved extremely high growth in recent decades. A number of factors such as high savings and investment, and availability of low wage labor, have contributed to rapid economic growth of East Asia’s developing countries. Among these factors, rapid expansion of foreign trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) has played very important roles, as they led to the formation of regional production network in East Asia, which has become an engine of economic growth in East Asia. With this background information in mind, I would like to discuss international economic situations in East Asia by examining changing patterns of foreign trade and investment. More specifically, I will focus on regional economic integration in East Asia in recent years. After making observations on the nature of regional economic integration in East Asia, I will discuss the major drivers behind such development. In the discussions, I would like to argue that the major driver of regional economic integration in East Asia is changing from market forces to institutional factors. In the discussions, I would like to shed light on the role of Japan in these developments. Most of my discussions refer to the developments before the current global economic crisis 1 because of the data availability, but I would like to discuss briefly its impacts on East Asia and the implications for the future economic prospects of East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Has the World Trade Organization Promoted
    IS THE GROWTH OF REGIONALISM AS SIGNIFICANT AS THE HEADLINES SUGGEST? LESSONS FROM AGRICULTURAL TRADE CATPRN Working Paper 2012-06 October 2012 Jason H. Grant Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Virginia Tech University http://www.catrade.org Funding for this project was provided by the Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy and Competitiveness Research Network (CATPRN) which in turn is funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. The views in this paper are those of the author and should not be attributed to the funding agencies. Abstract The proliferation of regional trade agreements (RTAs) has motivated a significant number of ex post econometric studies investigating their agricultural trade impacts. The general conclusion is that RTAs increase members’ trade by as much as 150 percent, on average. In this article, we demonstrate that previous empirical work likely misrepresents the impact of RTAs because of considerable heterogeneity in the depth of economic integration pursued by these agreements. Contrary to previous studies, the results reveal that RTAs are not universally trade creating, and some agreements appear to provide very little benefit. “Deep integration agreements”, on the other hand, are largely responsible for the impressive agricultural trade flow increases reported in the literature. Testing the hierarchy of RTAs largely confirms the theory: the benefits of regionalism are an increasing function of the depth of economic integration. Keywords: Agricultural trade, regional trade agreements, customs unions, free trade agreements, partial scope arrangements, gravity equation JEL Classification: F1, Q10 1. Introduction Regional trade agreements (RTAs) are not new, but many commentators agree that their importance in global trade is once again on the rise (Crawford and Fiorentino 2005; Fiorentino, Verdeja, and Toqueboeuf 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the International Monetary and Financial Architecture
    INTERNATIONAL POLICY ANALYSIS Reforming the International Monetary and Financial Architecture JOSÉ ANTONIO OCAMPO August 2014 n The international monetary and financial architecture has experienced important re- forms in recent years, yet profound limitations remain. Major gaps in the regulatory framework concern financial cross-border regulation, debt management, macroeco- nomic coordination, monetary and governance reform. n The IMF continues to face a stigma for many borrowers and the World Bank’s un- der-capitalization implies that it is unlikely to play the very active role it did during the North-American financial crisis in terms of providing future counter-cyclical financing. n The present, elaborate system of macroeconomic policy coordination has not avoid- ed the creation of new global imbalances, the most important caused by surplus accumulation in the EU, rising deficits in a large group of emerging and developing countries, insufficient capital account regulations and a lack of sovereign debt work- out mechanisms. n International monetary reform should involve three elements: the design of an apex organization more representative than the G20, advanced participation of develop- ing countries in the Bretton Woods Institutions and on the Financial Stability Board, and the design of a multi-layered financial architecture, with active participation of regional and sub-regional institutions. JOSÉ ANTONIO OCAMPO | REFORMING THE INTErnationaL MONEtarY AND FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE Table of Contents Introduction 2 1. Financial Regulation 2 2. Crisis Resolution 5 3. Macroeconomic Policy Cooperation and International Monetary Reform 10 4. Governance 16 5. Conclusions 17 References 19 This paper will also be published as the author’s contribution to the book prepared by the Committee of Development Policy (CDP), a subsidiary body of ECOSOC, on global governance and the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Capital Flows: the Case of Singapore
    Managing Capital Flows: The Case of Singapore Hwee Kwan Chow February 2008 ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 86 Hwee Kwan Chow was commissioned by the ADBI to provide a country study of Singapore for the project Managing Capital Flows. She is a practice associate professor at the Singapore Management University, Singapore. The author thanks the participants at the Technical Workshop on Managing Capital Flows for helpful comments and suggestions that led to improvements in the report. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. ADBI’s discussion papers reflect initial ideas on a topic, and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each discussion paper (given in the citation below). Some discussion papers may develop into research papers or other forms of publication. This discussion paper is part of the “Managing Capital Flows: Search for a Model” project. Suggested citation: Chow, Hwee Kwan. 2008. Managing Capital Flows: The Case of Singapore. ADBI Discussion Paper 86. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: http://www.adbi.org/discussion-paper/2008/02/21/2484.managing.capital.flows.singapore.case/ Asian Development Bank Institute Kasumigaseki Building 8F 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-6008, Japan Tel: +81-3-3593-5500 Fax: +81-3-3593-5571 URL: www.adbi.org E-mail: [email protected] © 2008 Asian Development Bank Institute ADBI Discussion Paper 86 Hwee Kwan Chow Abstract The resurgence of private capital inflows into Asia in recent years has raised the question of whether the region is susceptible to yet another financial crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    V. PADMANABHAN INSEAD 1 Ayer Rajah Avenue Singapore, Singapore 138676 Tel.: (65) 6799 5335 Fax: (65) 6799 5366 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph. D. University of Texas at Dallas, 1990 Major: Marketing M. S. University of Texas at Dallas, 1987 Major: Operations Research B. Tech Institute of Technology Benares Hindu University, 1985 Major: Mechanical Engineering ACADEMIC POSITIONS September 2014 – present The Unilever Professor of Marketing, INSEAD, Singapore. Academic Director – Emerging Markets Institute, INSEAD Fall 2008 – August 2014 The John H. Loudon Professor of International Management, INSEAD, Singapore. Spring 2002 – Summer 2008 INSEAD Chaired Professor of Marketing, INSEAD, Singapore. Summer 2001 – Fall 2001 Visiting Professor of Marketing, INSEAD- Singapore. Spring 2000 – Summer 2002 John K. and Ellen A. Wallace Distinguished Professor of Marketing, Olin School of Business, Washington University. Fall 1998 – Spring 2000 Professor of Marketing, Olin School of Business, Washington University. Fall 1990 - Summer 1998 Associate Professor, Fletcher Jones Faculty Fellow - Assistant Professor of Marketing, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Fall 1996-Winter 1997 Visiting Associate Professor of Marketing, INSEAD, France. Spring 1997- Summer 1997 Visiting Associate Professor of Marketing, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University. 1 HONORS • Listed by ISIHighlycited.com as amongst the 250 most highly cited Researchers in Economics and Business, 2010. • Bell, Chiang and Padmanabhan (1999), Finalist – 2009 INFORMS Society for Marketing Science Long Term Impact Award. Awarded annually by INFORMS for marketing paper published in Marketing Science, Management Science or other INFORMS journals. • Member, Distinguished Advisory Board, INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Singapore, June 2007. • Lee, Padmanabhan and Whang (1997) chosen by INFORMS Membership in 2005 as among the Top 10 Most Influential Papers in 50 Years of Publication of Management Science.
    [Show full text]