DOCSLIB.ORG

Adolescent Literacy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adolescent Literacy ROUTLEDGE LIBRARY EDITIONS: LITERACY Volume 4 ADOLESCENT LITERACY ADOLESCENT LITERACY What Works and Why JUDITH DAVIDSON AND DAVID KOPPENHAVER First published in 1993 by Garland This edition first published in 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 1993 Center for Early Adolescence, Judith Davidson, and David Koppenhaver All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 978-1-138-55984-4 (Set) ISBN: 978-0-203-70159-1 (Set) (ebk) ISBN: 978-0-8153-7274-5 (Volume 4) (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-351-23702-4 (Volume 4) (ebk) Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent. Disclaimer The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and would welcome correspondence from those they have been unable to trace. ADOLESCENT LITERACY lVhat Works and lVhy Second Edition Center for Early Adolescence The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Judith Davidson and David Koppenhaver GARLAND PUBLISHING, INC. • NEW YORK & LONDON 1993 © 1993 Center for Early Adolescence, Judith Davidson, and David Koppenhaver All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Davidson,Judith, 1953- Adolescent literacy: what works and why I Judith Davidson and David Koppenhaver. -2nd ed. p. em. - (Garland reference library of social science : vol. 828) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8153-0877-9 (alk. paper} ISBN 0-8153-0920-1 (pbk. alk. paper) 1. Project on Adolescent Literacy (U.S.} 2. Reading (Adult education)-United States. 3. Reading-United States-Remedial teaching. 4. Literacy-United States. I. Koppenhaver, David, 1956- . II. Title. Til. Series: Garland reference library of social science; v. 828. LC5225.R4D38 1993 428.4'071'2-dc20 92-13812 CIP Printed on 250-year-life, acid-free paper Manufactured in the United States of America CONTENTS Foreword vii Acknowledgments xi Introduction to the Second Edition xvii ADOLESCENT UTE.RACYTODAY 3 METHODOLOGY 39 THE KENOSHA MODEL: ACADEMIC IMPROVEMENT THROUGH lANGUAGE EXPERIENCE 53 STAR: STRUCTURED TEACHING IN THE AREAS OF READING AND WRITING 85 HILT: HIGH INTENSITY lANGUAGE TRAINING­ AN EFFECTIVE MODEL OF SECOND-lANGUAGE llTERACYINSTRUCTION 113 AFTER~SCHOOL UTERACY PROGRAMS FOR YOUNG ADOLESCENTS 141 SUMMER UTERACYPROGRAMS FOR YOUNG ADOLESCENTS 173 SPECIAL FINDINGS 209 WHAT WORKS AND WHY 221 TRANSlATING WHAT WORKS INTO PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 245 Appendix: Test Instruments Cited in This Book 259 An Annotated Resource List 261 General Bibliography 277 Index 313 v FOREWORD In schools across the country, adults are playing a game of make­ believe with young people. They say, in effect, "We will make believe we don't know that you can't read, if you will make believe that you can." Motivations for maintaining this mutual deception range from apathy to cynicism to despair. Lacking training, tools, and, too often, vision, the adults charged with preparing our youth for enriched and enriching futures condemn them to a game of chance more cruel than the classroom charade: a life spent impoverished by functional illiteracy. In this second edition of Adolescent Literacy: What Works and Why, the authors remind us that our concern about unmet literacy needs must not rest with "how many adolescents are at risk of illiteracy" but must be expanded to the more daunting question, "How many young adolescents will acquire adequate literacy skills?" Asking this ambitious question thrusts Adolescent Literacy into the public-policy arena, considering issues of poverty and race and of their powerful interrelationship. As the authors say, "By and large, the majority of those who are not gaining these critical literacy skills and the positive attitudes toward literacy that accompany accomplishment are young adolescents living in poverty. Low literacy achievement is part of the web of problems economically disadvantaged youth face, and it is both a cause and a consequence of many other problems they encounter." In its 1987 report, Children in Need: Investment Strategies for the Educationally Disadvantaged, the Committee for Economic Development (CED) warned its fellow corporate executives that: [d]emographic trends dramatize the need to address seriously the plight of the disadvantaged; the sheer numbers and the growing proportion of the U.S. population that they represent are staggering. The percentage of both poor children and minorities ln the United States has been rising vii viii Fureword steadily in recent years and will continue to climb in the foreseeable future .... In 1985, minorities represented about 17 percent of the total U.S. population. By the year 2020, this proportion is expected to rise more than one-third; if current demographic trends com. le, a larger proportion of this group will be children from disadvantaged homes. (p. 9) CED sounded an alarm that "the demographic imperative" required aggressive intervention because our schools perform least well with exactly the children whose numbers are rising: Mrican-American and Hispanic children living in poverty. Likewise, this second edition of Adolescent Literacy: R'itat Works and R'ity presses its readers to take vigorous action in both policymaking and program implementation. This book results from an investigation of reading programs that refuse to tolerate acquiescence to the inevitability of reading failure. This rich but readable, optimistic but wary book is utterly pragmatic. It lives up to its title. It tells us what works and why, through case studies and through observations gleaned from hundreds of days of exhaustive literature searches and exhausting site visits. The authors' message is deceptively simple: "Prominently characteristic of each of these successful programs is a firm belief by teachers and administrators in each young person's right and ability to learn to read, an emphasis on the importance of literacy, and a large proportion of instructional time devoted to actual reading and writing." They derived this message by asking deceptively simple questions: "Are the students reading and writing? What are they reading and writing? Can they talk about the books they have read and describe the kinds of writing projects they have completed? Are the teachers instructing, not just managing or evaluating? Are the students learning, not just complying? ... How do the participants feel about the program?" Preceding the articulation of those questions were months spent combing research on reading in early adolescence, numerous conversations with the nation's leading literacy experts, and discussions among members of the Center for Early Adolescence's literacy team that acknowledged few time or physical limitations. The mission of the Center for the past fourteen years has been to alert adults to the quality of young adolescents' lives as they Foreword zx negotiate the various challenges of their development and to strengthen the institutions established ostensibly to ease and enrich that development. As a result, the Project on Adolescent Literacy looked not only at schools but at nonschool and summer literacy programs as well. Some children spend their days in homes and schools filled with people who read for pleasure and livelihood, surrounded by book-filled rooms sending visual messages about the centrality of reading in their lives. For youngsters in literacy­ impoverished homes-and in some cases schools--out-of-school programs can become a critical factor in decisions to stay in school or to learn in an alternative institution. These investigators found out-of-school literacy programs that are changing the lives of young adolescents, who become eager readers rushing to find new books, to read to younger children, and even to serve as reconnectors to the schools they have rejected. A sampling of several excellent programs reveals, once again, a simple, underlying goal: to help students have a good experience with a book. Adolescent Literacy: What Works and Why is an optimistic book, assuring us that "good early adolescent literacy programs can make readers and writers out of students who school and community have despaired would ever learn." It urges us forward: "The results of these successful programs can be replicated, and the techniques and methods for doing so can be learned and shared." It presses for the adoption of a variety of policy recommendations that would help young people make the transition from beginning-level to proficient readers and writers-and thus would help break the stranglehold relationship between poverty and reading failure. Some of the authors' conclusions are sobering. For instance, the Project on Adolescent Literacy team found no successful after­ school literacy programs or summer-literacy programs designed specifically for the early adolescent age group. They also found communities mired in the debate about whether schools should provide services to beginning English-speakers, or who in the community is responsible for doing so. Even in some of the best programs, they found ardent people engaged in a complex endeavor, hampered by staff uninformed about theory and practice, lacking access to expert guidance and inspiration, too often hearing the sirens of packaged materials or computers that can never substitute for the expert instruction of an inspired teacher. They X Fureword were sobered by a flagging federal commitment to compensatory education at a time when increasing numbers of children live in poverty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functional Literacy and Numeracy
    MUVA: inquérito de literacia e numeracia funcional Conteúdo Motivation: Why did we do this work? Objectives: What did we try to measure and why does it matter? Methodology: Survey set-up, instruments, and levels of functional literacy and numeracy. Results: What are the levels of literacy and numeracy among the youth in Maputo and Beira? How are these related to gender, schooling, and economic activities? Implications Motivation: Why did we do this survey? MUVA Urban Youth Survey gave us data on young people’s “level of education” (highest class completed) However, we know that the level of education does not directly translate into skills and knowledge Highest class completed is not a good proxy for what young people actually can do at the workplace Experience from our projects show that even young people from 10th and 12th grade struggle with basic everyday workplace reading, writing, and numeracy tasks. Objective: What did we try to measure? Hence, we decided to go back to a sample of participants in our original MUVA Youth Survey to measure their ‘workplace literacy and numeracy’ We defined this as “a level of reading, writing and calculation skills sufficient to function in the particular community in which an individual lives and to effectively execute the tasks required at their place of work.” (Borrowed from UNICEF) This means we are interested in skills like: ability to comprehend, use, produce, and record information and calculations needed to get a job done right and on time. These are not the necessarily the same skills that are needed to get good grades in school.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolescents' Literacy Development in English As a Foreign Language In
    Adolescents’ Literacy Development in English as a Foreign Language in Iceland Lærke Engelbrecht M.Ed. Thesis University of Iceland School of Education Faculty of Teacher Education Adolescents’ Literacy Development in English as a Foreign Language in Iceland Lærke Engelbrecht M.Ed. Thesis in Teaching in Lower Secondary School Supervisor: Michael Dal Faculty of Teacher Education School of Education University of Iceland October 2015 Adolescents’ Literacy Development in English as a Foreign Language in Iceland This thesis is 30 ECTS in the final project towards a 120 ECTS M.Ed. degree at the School of Education, University of Iceland. © 2015 Lærke Engelbrecht This thesis may not be copied without permission from the author. Printed by: Háskólaprent ehf. Reykjavík, Iceland, 2015 Abstract The scope of the thesis centres on literacy development among adolescents in Iceland in English as a Foreign Language (EFL). The thesis is divided into two parts: a theoretical part and a section on qualitative research. The first part looks at the history and theories regarding reading and literacy development and learning motivation in adolescents. The second part focuses on a qualitative research study conducted in 2015 in Iceland. The results are based on data from interviews with two compulsory-school teachers, who teach EFL in grades 7-10 in Iceland. Literacy development is a crucial element for being able to participate actively and successfully in Icelandic society and to adapt to a rapidly changing and globalised world. The growing exposure and importance of English as a foreign language in Iceland and the rapid development of information and communication technology (ICT) requires both substantial knowledge of English and development of literacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in Adolescent Literacy from the Perspective That the Crisis Requires Focused Action at the Local and State Levels
    Addressing the “Crisis” in Adolescent Literacy Terry Salinger American Institutes for Research This paper was prepared for the U.S. Department of Education (ED), Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Smaller Learning Communities Program under Contract Number ED‐07‐CO‐0106 with EDJ Associates, Inc. in Herndon, VA. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of ED, nor do references to trade names, commercial products, services, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Some Reasons Why Many Students Struggle as Adolescents............................................................ 1 The Developmental Continuum From Early Reading Onward ........................................................... 3 Insufficient Guidance From State Standards....................................................................................... 4 Reading for Meaning and Learning...................................................................................................... 5 Outcomes of Low Literacy for Students in Secondary Schools .......................................................... 7 Planning to Meet the Adolescent Literacy Crisis................................................................................. 9 Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Chats: Co-Authorized Narratives and the Performance of Writerly Selves in Mass-Multiliterate Times
    IDENTITY CHATS: CO-AUTHORIZED NARRATIVES AND THE PERFORMANCE OF WRITERLY SELVES IN MASS-MULTILITERATE TIMES Stacy Kastner A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2013 Committee: Dr. Lee Nickoson, Advisor Dr. Savilla Banister Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Kristine Blair Dr. Sue Carter Wood Dr. Kevin Roozen, Auburn University © 2013 Stacy Kastner All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Lee Nickoson, Advisor Inspired by my classroom experience and Deborah Brandt’s findings that generations of Americans were resistant to calling themselves “writer,” this multimodal dissertation focuses on the critical narratives, reading and writing artifacts, reflections, and theories of two primary co- researching-participants (CRPs) concerning the complicated and elusive identity of “writer” (Barthes; Foucault) and the not always complimentary relationship between definitions of writing in school, in popular culture and opinion, and in everyday practice (Brodkey; Prior). I conducted two narrative case studies between December 2011 and May 2013 with two adolescents. In my study, I integrated methods from rhetoric, composition, and writing studies with a narrative inquiry methodology, building co-authorization into the research relationship and utilizing digital composing tools in order to disrupt the limitations and exclusivity of a traditionally single-authored and print-based space and in order to situate the stories of student writers at the center of my study. I also made use of a variety of dialogue-driven instruments: (1) oral histories and loosely-based interviews (Brandt; Selfe and Hawisher); (2) a writer’s questionnaire that asked CRPs to describe “writing,” the identity “writer,” and themselves as writers; (3) Joy Reid’s Perceptual Learning Styles Preference Questionnaire; (4) archives of CRPs’ print and digital reading and writing artifacts; (5) artifact-based interviews (Halbritter and Lindquist); and (6) text-based interviews (Roozen).
    [Show full text]
  • A Nation at Risk
    A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education United States Department of Education by The National Commission on Excellence in Education April 1983 April 26, 1983 Honorable T. H. Bell Secretary of Education U.S. Department of Education Washington, D.C. 20202 Dear Mr. Secretary: On August 26, 1981, you created the National Commission on Excellence in Education and directed it to present a report on the quality of education in America to you and to the American people by April of 1983. It has been my privilege to chair this endeavor and on behalf of the members of the Commission it is my pleasure to transmit this report, A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Our purpose has been to help define the problems afflicting American education and to provide solutions, not search for scapegoats. We addressed the main issues as we saw them, but have not attempted to treat the subordinate matters in any detail. We were forthright in our discussions and have been candid in our report regarding both the strengths and weaknesses of American education. The Commission deeply believes that the problems we have discerned in American education can be both understood and corrected if the people of our country, together with those who have public responsibility in the matter, care enough and are courageous enough to do what is required. Each member of the Commission appreciates your leadership in having asked this diverse group of persons to examine one of the central issues which will define our Nation's future.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review About Functional Illiteracy: Definition, Cognitive, Linguistic, And
    fpsyg-07-01617 November 8, 2016 Time: 17:17 # 1 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Frontiers - Publisher Connector REVIEW published: 10 November 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01617 A Review about Functional Illiteracy: Definition, Cognitive, Linguistic, and Numerical Aspects Réka Vágvölgyi1*, Andra Coldea2, Thomas Dresler1,3, Josef Schrader1,4 and Hans-Christoph Nuerk1,5,6* 1 LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, 2 School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, 3 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, 4 German Institute for Adult Education – Leibniz Centre for Lifelong Learning, Bonn, Germany, 5 Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, 6 Knowledge Media Research Center – Leibniz Institut für Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany Formally, availability of education for children has increased around the world over the last decades. However, despite having a successful formal education career, adults can become functional illiterates. Functional illiteracy means that a person cannot use Edited by: reading, writing, and calculation skills for his/her own and the community’s development. Bert De Smedt, KU Leuven, Belgium Functional illiteracy has considerable negative effects not only on personal development, Reviewed by: but also in economic and social terms. Although functional illiteracy has been highly Jascha Ruesseler, publicized in mass media in the recent years, there is limited scientific knowledge University of Bamberg, Germany Sarit Ashkenazi, about the people termed functional illiterates; definition, assessment, and differential Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel diagnoses with respect to related numerical and linguistic impairments are rarely *Correspondence: studied and controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition Studies 42.1 (2014) from the Editor Hat’S the Best Part of Your Job?” a Student in Advanced Composition “Wasked Me This Question Last Week
    Volume 42, Number 1 Spring 2014 composition STUDIES composition studies volume 42 number 1 Composition Studies C/O Parlor Press 3015 Brackenberry Drive Anderson, SC 29621 New Releases First-Year Composition: From Theory to Practice Edited by Deborah Coxwell-Teague & Ronald F. Lunsford. 420 pages. Twelve of the leading theorists in composition stud- ies answer, in their own voices, the key question about what they hope to accomplish in a first-year composition course. Each chapter, and the accompanying syllabi, pro- vides rich insights into the classroom practices of these theorists. A Rhetoric for Writing Program Administrators Edited by Rita Malenczyk. 471 pages. Thirty-two contributors delineate the major issues and questions in the field of writing program administration and provide readers new to the field with theoretical lenses through which to view major issues and questions. Recently Released . Writing Program Administration and the Community College Heather Ostman. The WPA Outcomes Statement—A Decade Later Edited by Nicholas N. Behm, Gregory R. Glau, Deborah H. Holdstein, Duane Roen, & Edward M. White. Writing Program Administration at Small Liberal Arts Colleges Jill M. Gladstein and Dara Rossman Regaignon. GenAdmin: Theorizing WPA Identities in the Twenty-First Century Colin Charlton, Jonikka Charlton, Tarez Samra Graban, Kathleen J. Ryan, & Amy Ferdinandt Stolley and with the WAC Clearinghouse . Writing Programs Worldwide: Profiles of Academic Writing in Many Places Edited by Chris Thaiss, Gerd Bräuer, Paula Carlino, Lisa Ganobcsik-Williams, & Aparna Sinha International Advances in Writing Research: Cultures, Places, Measures Edited by Charles Bazerman, Chris Dean, Jessica Early, Karen Lunsford, Suzie Null, Paul Rogers, & Amanda Stansell www.parlorpress.com 2013–2014 Reviewers A journal is only as good as its reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • About Fforum
    Contents About fforum ..................... 102 Television Viewing Experience : Text and Context in the Development of About fforum: Essays on Theory and Writing Skills Practice in the Teaching of Writing .. 103 Jean Long....................... 165 About this IsSue .................. 104 Evaluating Writing in an Academic Setting The Social Context of Literacy Michael Clark................... 170 Jay L. Robinson................... 105 Practicing Research by Researching The Literacy Crisis: A Challenge How? Practice William E. Coles, Jr.............. 114 Loren S. Barritt................ 187 Why We Teach Writing in the First Place A Comprehensive Literacy Program: Toby Fulwiler..................... 122 The English Composition Board patricia L. Stock............... 192 Metatheories of Rhetoric: Past Pipers Janice Lauer...................... 134 Select Bibliography Robert L. Root.................. 201 Rhetoric and the Teaching of Writing Cy ~noblauch...................... 137 Resources in the Teaching of Composition Science Writing and Literacy Robert L. Root.................. 216 Grace Rueter and Thomas M. Dunn... 141 d Language, Literature,and the Humanistic Tradition: Necessities in the Education of the Physician About fforum John H. Siegel, M.D............... 148 This issue of fforum is the last reqularly ~irstSilence, Then Paper scheduled number of the newsletter which - the English Composition Board will pub- Donald M. Murray.................. 155 lish. As you may imagine, 1 write this news to you with mixed feelings. On the Quiet, Paper, Madness: Place for A one hand, the newsletter has served the Writing to Reach To John Warnock...................... 161 purpose for which it was conceived at the first in a series of annual workshops for teachers in schools, colleges, and universities in the state of Michigan: Published twice annually by Winter, 1983 It has provided a vehicle for continuing The English Composition Board Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolescent Literacy References and Resources
    Adolescent Literacy References and Resources References • Alliance for Excellent Education. (2009, February). Adolescent literacy. Retrieved from www.all4ed.org/files/AdolescentLiteracyFactSheet.pdf. • Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action & research in middle & high school literacy-A report from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from www.all4ed.org. • Curtis, M. E., & Longo, A. M. (1999). When adolescents can’t read: Reading research to practice. Newton, MA: Brookline Books. • Deshler, D. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Nair, M. (2007). Informed choices for struggling adolescent readers: A research-based guide to instructional programs and practices. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. • Ehren, B., Lenz, B. K., & Deshler, D. D. (2004). Enhancing literacy proficiency with adolescents and young adults. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel, Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 681–702). New York, NY: Guilford Press. • Faggela-Luby, M. N., & Deshler, D. D. (2009). Reading comprehension in adolescents with LD: What we know, what we need to learn. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 70–78. • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from www.all4ed.org. • Haynes, M., & Levin, J. (2009). State actions to improve adolescent literacy: Results from NASBE’s state adolescent literacy network [Issues in Brief]. Arlington, VA: National Association of State Boards of Education. • Heller, R., & Greenleaf, C. L. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle & high school improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Areas of Effective Adolescent Literacy Programs
    EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN Vol. 36, No. 1, 2013 Key Areas of Effective Adolescent Literacy Programs Nancy E. Marchand-Martella, Ronald C. Martella, Sheri L. Modderman, Holly Petersen, and Spencer Pan Eastern Washington University Abstract This paper reviews best practices for effective adolescent literacy programs. A focus is placed on five areas of literacy instruction including word study, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and motivation. Each of these areas is discussed as well as how each area is relevant to reading and understanding narrative and content-area text at high levels. Keywords: adolescent literacy, academic literacy, vocabulary, comprehension, narrative, content-area, fluency, motivation, word study “ t no other time in our history has the ability to read been so important to all members of society” (Coyne, Kame’enui, & Carnine, 2011, p. 50). In fact, learning to read is the most important skill our students can learn in school, serving as the very foundation of all other academic subjects. Consider the following statistics noted by Brozo (2009)—about two-thirds of eighth and twelfth graders read below grade level; 32% of high school graduates are not prepared for college-level English composition courses; 40% of high school gradu- ates do not have the literacy skills required by employers; and 1.2 mil- lion students drop out of high school every year with literacy skills lower than those in most industrialized nations. Ensuring adoles- cents become literate, productive members of society is an undertak- ing that may not only increase the number of students who graduate from high school, succeed in college, and work in jobs that support a healthy lifestyle, but may also save the nation billions of dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • LI 003 880 AUTHOR Wayne State Univ., Detroit, Mich. Office
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 067 133 LI 003 880 AUTHOR Casey, Genevieve M., Ed. TITLE Public Library Service to the Illiterate Adult, Proceedings of a Seminar (March 9-11, 1972). INSTITUTION Wayne State Univ., Detroit, Mich. Office of Urban Library Research. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 161p.;(90 References) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; Adult Reading Programs; Conference Reports; Functional Illiteracy; *Illiterate Adults; Library Materials; *Library Services; *Public Libraries; Seminars IDENTIFIERS *Appalachia ABSTRACT The objectives of this three day seminar were to increase the knowledge about the functionally illiterate adult and his characteristics, research about non-reading adults, materials available for them, public library services and programs for illiterate adults as well as basic adult education activities offered by schools and other community agencies. The topics of the papers delivered are: The Functionally Illiterate Adult: Who is He, Where Is He, Why Is He?; Library Materials for Adult New Readers; The Role of . the Southern Appalachian Public Library in Dealing With Functional. Illiteracy; The Reader Development Program: Philadelphia Free Library; An Approach to Reading Programs for Adults; Comments Relative to Project R.E.A.D.: The Detroit Public Schools Adult Basic Education Program; Guidelines for Library Service to Illiterate Adults: Summery of Conference Discussions; Adult Basic Education: Criteria to be Followed in Approving Programs; Public Library Service to the Functionally Illiterate Adult: A List of Books, Periodical Articles and Films; and Background Readings about Adult New Readers. (Author/SJ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION 8 WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolescent Literacy Addressing the Needs of Students in Grades 4–12
    Adolescent Literacy Addressing the Needs of Students in Grades 4–12 By Joan Sedita Literacy skills in the 21st century are more essential than ever for success in education, work, citizenship, and our personal lives. However, far too many older students and adults do not have the necessary reading and writing skills to succeed in postsecondary education or the ever-increasing number of jobs that require strong literacy skills. During the 1990s and through 2008, significant emphasis was placed on the use of research to determine how children learn to read and why some students struggle with reading. Early literacy achievement, however, is not necessarily a guarantee that literacy skills will continue to grow as students move beyond Grade 3. In Reading Next, it is noted that: Recent National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading results indicate that efforts to improve K–3 literacy are paying off at the 4th-grade level, but these improvements do not necessarily translate into better achievement among adolescents… Comparing the most recent NAEP results for all three grade levels (i.e., 4, 8, and 12) to those from 1992, the percentage of students scoring proficient has significantly improved among 4th graders, but not among 8th and 12th graders. (Biancarosa & Snow, 2006, pp. 7–8) Scores at the secondary level, where there has been relatively little investment, have remained flat since the 1970s (Heller & Greenleaf, 2007). The following observation from Time to Act: An Agenda for Advancing Adolescent Literacy for College and Career Success sums up the challenges faced after Grade 3: The truth is that good early literacy instruction does not inoculate students against struggle or failure later on.
    [Show full text]