DOCSLIB.ORG

Attribute Coding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attribute Coding National Mapping Program Technical Instructions Part 3 Attribute Coding Standards for Digital Line Graphs U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Mapping Division Standards for Digital Line Graphs Part 3: Attribute Coding CONTENTS Page 3. Attribute Coding ......................... 3.0-1 3.0 General Principles ..................... 3.0-3 3.0.1 Coding Structure .................. 3.0-4 3.0.1.1 Major Code Description .......... 3.0-5 3.0.1.2 Minor Code Description .......... 3.0-5 3.0.2 Coding Description ................. 3.0-7 3.0.3 How to Measure a Feature .............. 3.0-8 3.0.4 Where To Digitize Features .............3.0-10 3.0.4.1 Lines ..................3.0-11 3.0.4.2 Areas ..................3.0-11 3.0.4.3 Degenerate Lines and Nodes ........3.0-11 3.0.5 Symbol Hierarchy and Symbol Suppression on the Map .3.0-11 3.0.6 Common Attribute Codes ...............3.0-12 3.0.6.1 Outside Area (000 0000) .........3.0-12 3.0.6.2 Void Area ................3.0-12 3.0.6.3 Processing Line (XX0 0299) ........3.0-13 3.0.6.4 Photorevised Features (XX0 0000) .....3.0-13 3.0.7 How Names and Labels Affect the Codes .......3.0-14 3.0.8 Record of Attribute Codes .............3.0-17 Appendix 3.0.A Feature Labels and Associated Attribute Codes ................. 3.0.A-1 Appendix 3.0.B Comprehensive List of Attribute Codes . 3.0.B-1 3.1 Hypsography--Major Code 020 ................ 3.1-1 3.1.1 General Principles ................. 3.1-1 3.1.1.1 Node Attribute Codes ........... 3.1-1 3.1.1.2 Area Attribute Codes ........... 3.1-1 3.1.1.3 Line Attribute Codes ........... 3.1-1 3.1.1.4 Single-Point Attribute Codes ....... 3.1-2 3.1.1.5 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..... 3.1-3 07/95 3-ii Standards for Digital Line Graphs Part 3: Attribute Coding 3.1.1.6 Descriptive Attribute Codes ....... 3.1-3 3.1.1.7 Parameter Attribute Codes ........ 3.1-3 3.1.1.8 List of Hypsography Attribute Codes ... 3.1-5 3.1.2 Node Attribute Codes ................ 3.1-7 3.1.3 Area Attribute Codes ................ 3.1-7 3.1.4 Line Attribute Codes ................ 3.1-7 3.1.5 Single-Point Attribute Codes ............3.1-10 3.1.6 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..........3.1-10 3.1.7 Descriptive Attribute Codes ............3.1-11 3.1.8 Parameter Attribute Codes .............3.1-12 3.2 Hydrography--Major Code 050 ................ 3.2-1 3.2.1 General Principles ................. 3.2-1 3.2.1.1 Node Attribute Codes ........... 3.2-5 3.2.1.2 Area Attribute Codes ........... 3.2-5 3.2.1.3 Line Attribute Codes ........... 3.2-7 3.2.1.4 Single-Point Attribute Codes ....... 3.2-9 3.2.1.5 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..... 3.2-9 3.2.1.6 Descriptive Attribute Codes ....... 3.2-9 3.2.1.7 Parameter Attribute Codes ........ 3.2-9 3.2.1.8 List of Hydrography Attribute Codes ...3.2-10 3.2.2 Node Attribute Codes ................3.2-14 3.2.3 Area Attribute Codes ................3.2-15 3.2.4 Line Attribute Codes ................3.2-24 3.2.5 Single-Point Attribute Codes ............3.2-27 3.2.6 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..........3.2-29 3.2.7 Descriptive Attribute Codes ............3.2-43 3.2.8 Parameter Attribute Codes .............3.2-47 Appendix 3.2.A Attribution of the Outlines of Hydrographic Areas ........... 3.2.A-1 3.3 Vegetative Surface Cover--Major Code 070 .......... 3.3-1 3.3.1 General Principles ................. 3.3-1 3.3.1.1 Node Attribute Codes ........... 3.3-1 3.3.1.2 Area Attribute Codes ........... 3.3-1 07/95 3-iii Standards for Digital Line Graphs Part 3: Attribute Coding 3.3.1.3 Line Attribute Codes ........... 3.3-1 3.3.1.4 Single-Point Attribute Codes ....... 3.3-1 3.3.1.5 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..... 3.3-1 3.3.1.6 Descriptive Attribute Codes ....... 3.3-1 3.3.1.7 Parameter Attribute Codes ........ 3.3-2 3.3.1.8 List of Vegetative Surface Cover Attribute Codes ............. 3.3-3 3.3.2 Node Attribute Codes ................ 3.3-4 3.3.3 Area Attribute Codes ................ 3.3-4 3.3.4 Line Attribute Codes ................ 3.3-5 3.3.5 Single-Point Attribute Codes ............ 3.3-5 3.3.6 General Purpose Attribute Codes .......... 3.3-5 3.3.7 Descriptive Attribute Codes ............ 3.3-5 3.3.8 Parameter Attribute Codes ............. 3.3-5 3.4 Non-vegetative Features--Major Code 080 .......... 3.4-1 3.4.1 General Principles ................. 3.4-1 3.4.1.1 Node Attribute Codes ........... 3.4-1 3.4.1.2 Area Attribute Codes ........... 3.4-1 3.4.1.3 Line Attribute Codes ........... 3.4-1 3.4.1.4 Single-Point Attribute Codes ....... 3.4-1 3.4.1.5 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..... 3.4-2 3.4.1.6 Descriptive Attribute Codes ....... 3.4-2 3.4.1.7 Parameter Attribute Codes ........ 3.4-2 3.4.1.8 List of Non-Vegetative Features Attribute Codes ............. 3.4-3 3.4.2 Node Attribute Codes ................ 3.4-4 3.4.3 Area Attribute Codes ................ 3.4-4 3.4.4 Line Attribute Codes ................ 3.4-5 3.4.5 Single-Point Attribute Codes ............ 3.4-5 3.4.6 General Purpose Attribute Codes .......... 3.4-5 3.4.7 Descriptive Attribute Codes ............ 3.4-5 3.4.8 Parameter Attribute Codes ............. 3.4-5 3.5 Boundaries--Major Code 090 ................. 3.5-1 07/95 3-iv Standards for Digital Line Graphs Part 3: Attribute Coding 3.5.1 General Principles ................. 3.5-1 3.5.1.1 Node Attribute Codes ........... 3.5-1 3.5.1.2 Area Attribute Codes ........... 3.5-1 3.5.1.3 Line Attribute Codes ........... 3.5-2 3.5.1.4 Single-Point Attribute Codes ....... 3.5-2 3.5.1.5 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..... 3.5-3 3.5.1.6 Descriptive Attribute Codes ....... 3.5-3 3.5.1.7 Parameter Attribute Codes ........ 3.5-3 3.5.1.8 List of Boundaries Attribute Codes .... 3.5-4 3.5.2 Node Attribute Codes ................ 3.5-6 3.5.3 Area Attribute Codes ................ 3.5-6 3.5.4 Line Attribute Codes ................3.5-11 3.5.5 Single-Point Attribute Codes ............3.5-13 3.5.6 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..........3.5-13 3.5.7 Descriptive Attribute Codes ............3.5-13 3.5.8 Parameter Attribute Codes .............3.5-13 Appendix 3.5.A Civil Divisions ............ 3.5.A-1 Appendix 3.5.B Generic Examples of Reservation Types . 3.5.B-1 Appendix 3.5.C Various Reservations and Equivalent Attribute Codes ............ 3.5.C-1 3.6 Survey Control and Markers--Major Code 150 ......... 3.6-1 3.6.1 General Principles ................. 3.6-1 3.6.1.1 Node Attribute Codes ........... 3.6-1 3.6.1.2 Area Attribute Codes ........... 3.6-1 3.6.1.3 Line Attribute Codes ........... 3.6-1 3.6.1.4 Single-Point Attribute Codes ....... 3.6-1 3.6.1.5 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..... 3.6-2 3.6.1.6 Descriptive Attribute Codes ....... 3.6-2 3.6.1.7 Parameter Attribute Codes ........ 3.6-2 3.6.1.8 List of Survey Control and Markers Attribute Codes ............. 3.6-3 3.6.2 Node Attribute Codes ................ 3.6-5 3.6.3 Area Attribute Codes ................ 3.6-5 07/95 3-v Standards for Digital Line Graphs Part 3: Attribute Coding 3.6.4 Line Attribute Codes ................ 3.6-5 3.6.5 Single-Point Attribute Codes ............ 3.6-5 3.6.6 General Purpose Attribute Codes .......... 3.6-7 3.6.7 Descriptive Attribute Codes ............ 3.6-7 3.6.8 Parameter Attribute Codes ............. 3.6-8 3.7 Roads and Trails--Major Code 170 .............. 3.7-1 3.7.1 General Principles ................. 3.7-1 3.7.1.1 Node Attribute Codes ........... 3.7-1 3.7.1.2 Area Attribute Codes ........... 3.7-1 3.7.1.3 Line Attribute Codes ........... 3.7-1 3.7.1.4 Single-Point Attribute Codes ....... 3.7-2 3.7.1.5 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..... 3.7-2 3.7.1.6 Descriptive Attribute Codes ....... 3.7-3 3.7.1.7 Parameter Attribute Codes ........ 3.7-3 3.7.1.8 List of Roads and Trails Attribute Codes . 3.7-5 3.7.2 Node Attribute Codes ................ 3.7-8 3.7.3 Area Attribute Codes ................ 3.7-9 3.7.4 Line Attribute Codes ................ 3.7-9 3.7.5 Single-Point Attribute Codes ............3.7-14 3.7.6 General Purpose Attribute Codes ..........3.7-14 3.7.7 Descriptive Attribute Codes ............3.7-17 3.7.8 Parameter Attribute Codes .............3.7-22 3.8 Railroads--Major Code 180 ................. 3.8-1 3.8.1 General Principles ................. 3.8-1 3.8.1.1 Node Attribute Codes ........... 3.8-1 3.8.1.2 Area Attribute Codes ........... 3.8-1 3.8.1.3 Line Attribute Codes ........... 3.8-1 3.8.1.4 Single-Point Attribute Codes ....... 3.8-2 3.8.1.5 General Purpose Attribute Codes ....
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish Or Mexican Authorities
    -::, » . .• f Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish or Mexican Authorities Prepared by the Staff of the State Lands Commission ----- -- -·- PREFACE This report was prepared by Cris Perez under direction of Lou Shafer. There were three main reasons for its preparation. First, it provides a convenient reference to patent data used by staff Boundary Officers and others who may find the information helpful. Secondly, this report provides a background for newer members who may be unfamiliar with Spanish and Mexican land grants and the general circumstances surrounding the transfer of land from Mexican to American dominion. Lastly, it provides sources for additional reading for those who may wish to study further. The report has not been reviewed by the Executive Staff of the Commission and has not been approved by the State Lands Commission. If there are any questions regarding this report, direct them to Cris Perez or myself at the Office of the State Lands Commission, 1807 - 13th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. ROY MINNICK, Supervisor Boundary Investigation Unit 0401L VI TABLE OF CONTENlS Preface UI List of Maps x Introduction 1 Private Land Claims in California 2 Missions, Presidios, and Pueblos 7 Explanation of Terms Used in This Report 14 GRANTS OF LAND BY COUNTY AlamE:1da County 15 Amador County 19 Butte County 21 Calaveras County 23 Colusa County 25 Contra Costa County 27 Fresno County 31 Glenn County 33 Kern County 35 Kings County 39 Lake County 41 Los Angeles County 43 Marin County 53 Mariposa County 57 Mendocino County
    [Show full text]
  • Baldwin Park City Los Angeles County California, U
    BALDWIN PARK CITY LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA, U. S. A. Baldwin Park, California Baldwin Park, California Baldwin Park is a city located in the central San Gabriel Valley region of Baldwin Park es una ciudad ubicada en la región central del Valle de San Los Angeles County, California, United States. As of the 2010 census, the Gabriel del Condado de Los Ángeles, California, Estados Unidos. A partir del population was 75,390, down from 75,837 at the 2000 census. censo de 2010, la población era de 75,390, por debajo de 75,837 en el censo de 2000. Contents Contenido 1. History 1. Historia 2. Climate 2. Clima 3. Geography 3. Geografía 4. Demographics 4. Demografía 4.1 2010 4.1 2010 4.2 2000 4.2 2000 5. Government 5. Gobierno 6. Economy 6. economía 6.1 Top employers 6.1 Principales empleadores 7. Education 7. Educación 7.1 Schools 7.1 Escuelas 7.2 Libraries 7.2 Bibliotecas 8. Public Transit 8. Tránsito público 9. Sport and diversion 9. Deporte y diversión. 10. Notable people 10. personas notables 1. History. 1. Historia Baldwin Park began as part of cattle grazing land belonging to the San Baldwin Park comenzó como parte de las tierras de pastoreo de ganado Gabriel Mission. It eventually became part of the Rancho Azusa de Dalton and pertenecientes a la Misión de San Gabriel. Eventualmente se convirtió en parte the Rancho La Puente properties. The community became known as Vineland de las propiedades Rancho Azusa de Dalton y Rancho La Puente. La comunidad in 1860.
    [Show full text]
  • Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press
    UCLA Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press Title Native Americans at Mission Santa Cruz, 1791-1834 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9j67q6t8 ISBN 0-917956-92-3 Author Allen, Rebecca Publication Date 1998 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PERSPECTIVES IN CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGY, VOLUME 5 Native Americans at Mission Santa Cruz, 1791-1834 Interpreting the Archaeological Record Rebecca Allen Institute of Archaeology University of California, Los Angeles 1998 UCLA INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY EDITORIAL BOARD Jeanne E. Arnold, Marilyn Beaudry-Corbett, Susan Downey, Ernestine S. Elster, Lothar von Falkenhausen, Richard G. Lesure, Richard M. Leventhal, Daniel C. Polz, Glenn Russell, and James R. Sackett UCLA INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY Richard M. Leventhal, Director Marilyn Beaudry-Corbett, Director of Publications EDITORS Rita Demsetz, Marilyn Gatto, and Brenda Johnson-Grau DESIGNER Brenda Johnson-Grau PRODUCTION Amy Chen, Linda Tang, and Michael Tang Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Allen, Rebecca. Native Americans at Mission Santa Cruz, 1791-1834: interpreting the archaeological record/ Rebecca Allen. p. cm. (Perspectives in California Archaeology; v. 5) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-917956-92-3 1. Mission Santa Cruz. 2. Costanoan Indians-Missions. 3. Costanoan Indians-Antiquities. 4. Yokuts Indians-Missions. 5. Yokuts Indians-Antiquities. 6. Franciscans-Missions-California-Santa Cruz. 7. Excavations (Archaeology}-California-Santa Cruz. 8. Spain-Colonies-­
    [Show full text]
  • Maestro Francisco Correa De Arauxo's (1584–1654) Facultad Orgánica (1626) As a Source of Performance Practice
    View metadata,citationandsimilarpapersatcore.ac.uk MAESTRO FRANCISCO CORREA DE ARAUXO’S (1584–1654) ARAUXO’S FRANCISCOCORREADE MAESTRO MAESTRO FRANCISCO CORREA DE ARAUXO’S (1584–1654) FACULTAD ORGÁNICA (1626) AS A SOURCE OF PERFORMANCE PRACTICE by Iina-Karita Hakalahti FACULTAD ORGÁNICA FACULTAD (1626) AS A SOURCEOFPERFORMANCEPRACTICE AS (1626) Front Cover: Photograph of the main door of "Colegio Mayor de Arzobispo Fonseca" (the City of Salamanca, Spain) by Iina-Karita Hakalahti (1996). Back Cover: Watermark appearing in the Madrid provided by exemplar R.9279 of the Facultad orgánica. Drawing made by Iina-Karita Hakalahti. byIina-KaritaHakalahti Helsingin yliopistondigitaalinenarkisto ISBN 978-952-5531-41-1 ISSN 0788-3757 brought toyouby Helsinki University Print Helsinki 2008 CORE Studia Musica 33 MAESTRO FRANCISCO CORREA DE ARAUXO’S (1584–1654) FACULTAD ORGÁNICA (1626) AS A SOURCE OF PERFORMANCE PRACTICE I II MAESTRO FRANCISCO CORREA DE ARAUXO’S (1584–1654) FACULTAD ORGÁNICA (1626) AS A SOURCE OF PERFORMANCE PRACTICE by Iina-Karita Hakalahti A Dissertation Presented to the DocMus Department of the Sibelius Academy in partial fulfi llment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Music June 2008 III Copyright © Iina-Karita Hakalahti Graphic design: Heikki Jantunen ISBN 978-952-5531-43-5 (pdf) ISSN 0788-3757 Helsinki University Print Helsinki 2008 IV Sibelius Academy DocMus Department 2008 Iina-Karita Hakalahti: MAESTRO FRANCISCO CORREA DE ARAUXO’S (1584–1654) FACULTAD ORGÁNICA (1626) AS A SOURCE OF PERFORMANCE PRACTICE A dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Music ABSTRACT I regard Francisco Correa de Arauxo as the most important composer of organ music of seventeenth-century Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Finding
    This page is intentionally left blank. Proposed Finding The Juaneño Band of Mission Indians (Petitioner #84B) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................... iii SPANISH TERMS LIST ................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 Administrative History.............................................................................................2 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................4 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND.........................................................................................8 UNAMBIGUOUS PREVIOUS FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............................30 CONCLUSIONS UNDER THE CRITERIA (25 CFR 83.7) ............................................33 Criterion 83.7(a).................................................................................................... 36 Criterion 83.7(b) ................................................................................................... 53 Criterion 83.7(c) ..................................................................................................130 Criterion 83.7(d) .................................................................................................172 Criterion 83.7(e) ..................................................................................................178
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Ecology and Landscape Change of the San Gabriel River and Floodplain
    AND LANDSCAPE CHANGE of the SCCWRP Technical Report #499 Eric D. Stein Shawna Dark Travis Longcore Nicholas Hall Michael Beland Robin Grossinger Jason Casanova Martha Sutula HISTORICAL ECOLOGY AND LANDSCAPE CHANGE OF THE SAN GABRIEL RIVER AND FLOODPLAIN SCCWRP Technical Report # 499 February 2007 Eric D. Stein1*, Shawna Dark2, Travis Longcore3, Nicholas Hall3, Michael Beland2, Robin Grossinger4, Jason Casanova5, and Martha Sutula1 1Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 2California State University Northridge 3University of Southern California 4San Francisco Estuary Institute 5Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council *corresponding author Phone 714-755-3233 | E-mail [email protected] | Web www.sccwrp.org d s an San 8 le G $ 3 e a $ 1 g b 4 n r i A e l s o R L i v e e r h s T W a t il er c sh un Es 9 ed Co tablished 196 PREFACE: A WORD ABOUT HISTORICAL ECOLOGY A historical landscape perspective is important not for sentimental or how the ecosystem has functioned over time, and how it has adapted idealistic reasons, but because it helps us understand the contempo- and responded to changes in the landscape. Areas of susceptibility rary landscape, factors that influence its nature and structure, and its and resiliency can be better understood through an examination of future potential. The goal of historical ecology is neither to recreate the past. In this way, historical ecology provides a valuable template the past nor to directly design the future. Rather, the goal is to docu- for restoration and conservation planning by providing insight ment and understand historical reference points and the factors that into the appropriate location and distribution of habitats and plant influence change, including land use, climate, and natural events, communities with respect to inherent landscape constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment
    Draft San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment September 2011 Produced by the Pacifi c West Regional Offi ce Park Planning and Environmental Compliance National Park Service San Francisco, California U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Top, left to right: Frank G. Bonelli Regional Park, NPS photo; Inspiration Point, Angeles National Forest, NPS photo. Bottom: Eaton Canyon Natural Area, NPS photo. California Broom Sage, Santa Clara River near Acton. Photo courtesy of BonTerra Consulting. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study & Environmental Assessment Errata October 2012 1 San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study & Environmental Assessment Errata October 2012 The following errata provide factual corrections, additions, and revisions to the Draft San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment (draft study report/EA), dated September 2011. Changes to the draft study report/EA, and references to the page number where the change has occurred are provided. The reader must have access to a copy of the draft study report/EA in order to fully understand the changes. Additional copies of this document and the September 2011 report can be downloaded from the internet at www.nps.gov/pwro/sangabriel. Printed copies are also available on request from the address below. National Park Service Attn: San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study 333 Bush Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94104 2 INTRODUCTION The following document includes errata that correct and add factual information to the September 2011 Draft San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment (draft study report/EA).
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Emerald Necklace Trails Project Los Angeles County, California
    APPENDIX D Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Emerald Necklace Trails Project Los Angeles County, California By: Roger D. Mason, Ph.D., RPA Prepared for: Withers & Sandgren 20948 Tulsa Street Chatsworth, California 91311 Prepared by: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 1801 Park Court Place, B-103 Santa Ana, California 92701 May 2016 Keywords: Cultural resources records search, CEQA, El Monte, Whittier Narrows, Los Angeles County, USGS El Monte and Baldwin Park, CA 7.5-minute quads APPENDIX D CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY A cultural resources investigation was conducted for the construction of the Emerald Necklace Trails Project, Los Angeles County. The Emerald Necklace Project, when completed, will be a 17-mile interconnected network of bikeways, multi-use trails, parks, and greenways along the Rio Hondo and the San Gabriel River in Los Angeles County. The investigation was completed to assess whether cultural resources would be impacted as a result of the Project. The assessment was based on a records search conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center, a study of historical maps, and the prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic context for the project area. The prehistoric and ethnographic context shows that in Late Prehistoric times, the Gabrielino occupied the area and lived in villages along the rivers and drainages. The site of the first San Gabriel Mission is located in the western part of the Whittier Narrows area. There were also late 19th-century settlements in this area. The results of the records search also indicate numerous previously recorded prehistoric and historic sites in the western part of the Whittier Narrows area.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Intro TITLE PAGE-1
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Loyalty and Disloyalty to the Bourbon Dynasty in Spanish America and the Philippines During the War of the Spanish Succession (1700-1715) A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Aaron Alejandro Olivas 2013 © Copyright by Aaron Alejandro Olivas 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Loyalty and Disloyalty to the Bourbon Dynasty in Spanish America and the Philippines During the War of the Spanish Succession (1700-1715) by Aaron Alejandro Olivas Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Kathryn Norberg, Chair My project analyzes the transatlantic consequences of the War of the Spanish Succession, one of the first global wars. Focusing primarily on relations between Spanish America and France, it establishes a connection between colonial resistance to the Spanish crown, interactions between European empires, and global trade. Previous scholars have assumed that Spain’s overseas empire accepted the transition from Habsburg to Bourbon rule without complaint, however my project reveals that the succession acted as a catalyst fomenting disloyalty throughout the viceroyalties of New Spain and Peru. Representing a wide social and ethnic spectrum, wartime disloyalty cases illustrate the complexity of challenging Spanish imperial rule a century before the independence movements. ! ""! My project also demonstrates that trans-imperial forces actually shaped the contours of the Spanish empire. It provides concrete evidence as to how interactions between Spanish colonial subjects, foreign merchants, and the French, English, and Dutch governments steered personal loyalties regarding Spanish sovereignty during such political crises. Furthermore, it offers a new political perspective on the transatlantic slave trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1892
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1892 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892; BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1892 Collection number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892; BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Finding Aid Author(s): Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt Date Completed: March 2008 Finding Aid Encoded By: GenX © 2015 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1892 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892; BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creator: United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 PortfoliosLinear feet: Approximately 75Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1495 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish Or Mexican Authorities
    DCAl.i\ I IJlr I f Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish or Mexican Authorities Prepared by the Staff of the State Lands Commission PREFACE This report was prepared by Cris Perez under direction of Lou Shafer. There were three main reasons for its preparation. First, it provides a convenient reference to patent data used by staff Boundary Officers and others who may find the information helpful. Secondly, this report provides a background for newer members who may be unfamiliar with Spanish and Mexican land grants and the general circumstances surrounding the transfer of land from Mexican to American dominion. - Lastly, it provides sources for additional reading for those who may wish to study further. The report has not been reviewed by the Executive Staff of the Commission and has not been approved by the State Lands Commission. If there are any questions regarding this report, direct them to Cris Perez or myself at the Office of the State Lands Commission, 1807 - 13th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. ROY MINNICK. Supervisor Boundary Investigation Unit 0401L VI TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface VI List of Maps X Introduction 1 Private Land Claims in California 2 Missions, Presidios, and Pueblos 7 Explanation of Terms Used in This Report 14 GRANTS OF LAND BY COUNTY A1ameda County 15 Amador County 19 Butte County 21 Calaveras County 23 Colusa County 25 Contra Costa County 27 Fresno County 31 Glenn County 33 Kern County 35 Kings County 39 Lake County 41 Los Angeles County 43 Marin County 53 Mariposa County 57 Mendocino County 59 Merced
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Beginnings [1]
    Chapter 1: Beginnings [1] San Francisco was a genteel, laid-back sort of town from its early Spanish beginnings in the 1700s to the drifting in of pioneering Europeans and U.S. citizens. But shortly after the cry "Gold!" was heard from Sutter's Mill in January, 1848, even the most sober and settled of its citizens caught the fever and joined in the rush. Overnight carpenters dropped their hammers, masons their trowels, bakers their loaves, clerks their pens, to rush to the American River. Schools were closed as both teachers and pupils deserted; shopkeepers hung signs on their doors -- "Gone to the Diggings," "Off to the Mines" -- and disappeared. By June 15 [1849] San Francisco was a ghost town, with houses and shops empty, and all who could walk, ride, run, or crawl rushing toward the Sierras."[2] A ghost town, yes, but not for long. A year later San Francisco was alive again with those returning from the mines, rich or as poor as ever, and with late comers from near and far stopping off to cash in. The town soon became "the City," percentage-wise as cosmopolitan as we find it today. So a wide-eyed seminarian, later ordained by the city's first archbishop, wrote to the Society of the Propagation of the Faith on September 18, 1851: What a port! What a town! What a population! French, English, Germans, Italians, Mexicans, Americans, Indians, Canacs, and even Chinese; white, black, yellow, brown, Christians, pagans, Protestants, atheists, brigands, thieves, convicts, firebrands, assassins; little good, much bad; behold the population of San Francisco, the new Babylon teeming with crime, confusion and frightful vice.[3] The archbishop who ordained this young enthusiast was Joseph Sadoc Alemany, then, as the above letter was being written, simply (!) bishop of the two Californias, Alta and Baja, Nevada, most of Utah and a fair slice of Arizona, with his episcopal see in Monterey.
    [Show full text]