C. Eastern District - 52 - C. Eastern District

Appendix II - C Eastern District Summaries of Written/Oral Representations

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O 1 All 1 - Holds no objection to the The view is noted. DCCAs provisional recommendations on all DCCAs of the Eastern District.

2 All 1 - (a) Supports the provisional Item (a) DCCAs recommendations on C03 The supporting view is noted. (Lei King Wan), C04 (Sai Wan Ho), C05 (Aldrich Bay), C06 (Shaukeiwan), C07 (A Kung Ngam) and C28 ().

(b) Holds reservation on the Item (b) provisional In accordance with the EACO, recommendations on C01 the EAC must follow the (Tai Koo Shing West), C02 number of elected seats (Tai Koo Shing East), C15 stipulated for each DC under (Mount Parker), C24 the DCO in delineating the (Quarry Bay), C25 (Nam DCCA boundaries. As this Fung), C26 () and proposal made in the C27 (Kornhill Garden). representation is related to the Although the provisional enactment of the primary recommendations are more legislation, which does not fall practicable having regard to under the purview of the EAC, community integrity and the EAC has referred the population distribution, relevant view to the CMAB for according to the aggregate consideration. population of the above DCCAs, their total number of elected seats is currently one more than that of their entitlement. Proposes to delete one seat in 2023 for reasonable deployment of DC resources.

* W: Number of written representations. O : Number of oral representations.

C. Eastern District - 53 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O (c) Holds reservation on the Item (c) provisional In accordance with the EACO, recommendations on C10 the EAC must follow the (), C12 (King number of elected seats Yee), C13 (), C14 stipulated for each DC under (), C31 (), the DCO in delineating the C34 (Yue Wan) and C35 DCCA boundaries. As this (), and objects to the proposal made in the provisional representation is related to the recommendations on C08 enactment of the primary (Heng Fa Chuen), C09 legislation, which does not fall (), C11 (Siu Sai under the purview of the EAC, Wan), C32 () and the EAC has referred the C33 (). relevant view to the CMAB for According to the aggregate consideration. population of the above DCCAs, their total number of elected seats is currently two more than that of their entitlement. Proposes to delete one seat in 2023 for reasonable deployment of DC resources.

(d) Proposes to transfer the area Item (d) of the Hong Kong Institute This proposal is not accepted of Vocational Education because: (“IVE”) from C08 (Heng Fa Chuen) to C09 (Tsui Wan) (i) the affected population and maintain the boundary under the proposal made of C11 (Siu Sai Wan) in the representation (246) because IVE and the will be larger than that in Technological and Higher the provisional Education Institute of Hong recommendations (179) Kong in C09 (Tsui Wan) are by 67; both managed by the Vocational Training Council (ii) IVE located in C08 (Heng and affected by the Fa Chuen) is industrial and cargo geographically further working areas in C09 (Tsui away from the buildings Wan), sharing the same in C09 (Tsui Wan) as community characteristics compared with Fu Ming and issues of concern. Court as proposed for

C. Eastern District - 54 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O transfer to C09 (Tsui Wan) in the provisional recommendations. There are also park and Citybus depot in between; and

(iii) the delineation recommendations must be based on objective data of population distribution. Arrangement on district administration matters is not the relevant factor of consideration.

(e) Proposes to transfer Koway Item (e) Court instead of Wah Ha This proposal is not accepted Estate from C33 (Tsui Tak) because: to C32 (Lok Hong) because: (i) according to the proposal  the car park of Koway made in the Court is located at Tai representation, the Man Street, which population of C33 (Tsui affects the transport near Tak) (11 100) will be Neptune Terrace and below the statutory Greenwood Terrace permissible lower limit located also at Tai Man (-33.13%); and Street in C32 (Lok Hong); and (ii) the delineation recommendations must be  Wah Ha Estate is close based on the population to MTR Chai Wan distribution and relevant Station and belongs to a local factors. It is community different inevitable that a DCCA is from Neptune Terrace composed of more than and Greenwood Terrace one community. located at the mid-levels in C32 (Lok Hong).

(f) Holds reservation on the Item (f) provisional The proposal made in the recommendations on C16 representation involves

C. Eastern District - 55 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O (Braemar Hill), C17 alteration of administrative (Fortress Hill), C18 (City district boundaries, which does Garden), C19 (), not fall under the purview of C20 (Fort Street), C21 the EAC. The EAC has (), C22 () referred this view to the and C23 (Healthy Village). Government for consideration. Considering the differences in area and population between the Eastern and the Wan Chai DCs, proposes to transfer the above DCCAs from the Eastern District to the Wan Chai District in 2023 and to rename the Wan Chai District as the Harbour District to reflect that Wan Chai and North Point are located at the bay area in the central part of the Hong Kong Island.

(g) Same as item 16. Item (g) Please see item 16.

3 C03 – 1 - To strengthen community ties This proposal is not accepted Lei King and bring the populations of because the populations of Wan C03 (Lei King Wan) and C04 C03 (Lei King Wan), C04 (Sai (Sai Wan Ho) closer to the Wan Ho) and C28 (Hing C04 – population quota, proposes: Tung) will fall within the Sai Wan statutory permissible range. Ho  to transfer Les Saisons from According to the established C04 (Sai Wan Ho) to C03 working principles, C28 – (Lei King Wan) as it has adjustments to their existing Hing closer community ties with boundaries are not required. Tung C03 (Lei King Wan);

 to transfer the old residential blocks (except Tai On Building) from C03 (Lei King Wan) to C04 (Sai Wan Ho), so that the population of C03 (Lei King Wan) can continue to fall within the

C. Eastern District - 56 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O statutory permissible range; and

 to transfer 18 Upper East and Shing On Building, or even Parker33, The Oakridge, Fortune Court, Tai Sing House and Truecourse Tower from C04 (Sai Wan Ho) to C28 (Hing Tung), depending on the population figures.

4 C04 – 1 - Proposes to transfer Sun Sing This proposal is not accepted Sai Wan Centre, Lok Kwan House and because: Ho Belleve Court from C04 (Sai Wan Ho) to C29 (Lower Yiu (i) the populations of C04 C29 – Tung) because: (Sai Wan Ho) and C29 Lower (Lower Yiu Tung) will Yiu Tung  there will be new residential fall within the statutory developments with imminent permissible range. population intake and a lot of According to the residential projects are in established working progress in C04 (Sai Wan principles, adjustments to Ho). Expects that the their existing boundaries population of the DCCA will are not required; increase significantly. The EAC should have foreseen (ii) it is an established the above situation and practice that the adjust the boundary of the delineation exercise for a DCCA concerned as soon as DC ordinary election possible to avoid future should be conducted on adjustment and causing the basis of the latest confusion to the residents projected population without knowing who is their figures as at 30 June of DC member; the election year. Developments thereafter  it will be hard for the DC will not be taken into member to manage if the consideration; and DCCA is overpopulated, and it is also unfair to residents; (iii) the delineation and recommendations must be based on objective data of

C. Eastern District - 57 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O  C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) has population distribution. the capacity to absorb more Community services population. provided by DC members is not the relevant factor of consideration.

5 C04 – 3 - (a) Propose to transfer both Yiu Items (a) and (b) Sai Wan Fung House and Yiu On These proposals are not Ho House from C29 (Lower accepted because: Yiu Tung) to C30 (Upper C29 – Yiu Tung) and the private (i) the number of affected Lower residential buildings near DCCAs under the Yiu Tung Sun Sing Street from C04 proposal made in the (Sai Wan Ho) to C29 representations will be C30 – (Lower Yiu Tung). one more than that in the Upper Reasons are summarised as provisional Yiu Tung follows: recommendations. The affected population under  Yiu Fung House and Yiu the proposal will be On House are next to larger, too; each other geographically; (ii) if both Yiu Fung House and Yiu On House are  query that the EAC is transferred from C29 under pressure and (Lower Yiu Tung) to C30 political considerations (Upper Yiu Tung), the not to transfer Yiu Fung affected population House and Yiu On (2 028) will be larger than House together to C30 that in the provisional (Upper Yiu Tung); recommendations (983) by 1 045;  activities of the residents living along Sun Sing (iii) it is an established Street are mainly practice that the centralised in the area of delineation exercise for a Shau Kei Wan; DC ordinary election should be conducted on  residents have always the basis of the latest regarded Hoi An Street projected population as the boundary of Sai figures as at 30 June of Wan Ho. Across Hoi the election year. An Street is Shau Kei Developments thereafter Wan; will not be taken into

C. Eastern District - 58 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O  consider that the EAC consideration; and has underestimated the population of C04 (Sai (iv) the delineation Wan Ho). As there will recommendations must be be new residential based on objective data of developments with population distribution. imminent population Community services intake at Sun Sing Street, provided by DC members expect that the or political factors will population of C04 (Sai not be taken into Wan Ho) will increase consideration. substantially. The above proposal can relieve the population growth of C04 (Sai Wan Ho);

 the above proposal can resolve the problem of insufficient and persistent decrease in population of C30 (Upper Yiu Tung) over the years and allow C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) to absorb part of the population of C04 (Sai Wan Ho) as early as possible as its population will go up significantly; and

 the above proposal can even out the populations of C04 (Sai Wan Ho), C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) and C30 (Upper Yiu Tung). It will be more fair to the residents if the populations served by DC members of different DCCAs are similar.

C. Eastern District - 59 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O (b) One representation further proposes to transfer buildings such as Sun Sing Centre and Belleve Court from C04 (Sai Wan Ho) to C29 (Lower Yiu Tung).

6 C05 – 2 - Object to the provisional This representation is not Aldrich recommendations on C05 accepted because: Bay (Aldrich Bay), C06 (Shaukeiwan) and C07 (A (i) the populations of C05 C06 – Kung Ngam) because: (Aldrich Bay), C06 Shaukeiwan (Shaukeiwan) and C07 (A  the provisional Kung Ngam) will fall C07 – recommendations on the within the statutory A Kung above DCCAs do not have permissible range. Ngam regard to the community According to the integrity and local ties; established working principles, adjustments to  Aldrich Garden has been their existing boundaries included in C07 (A Kung are not required; and Ngam) since 2011. However, the residents of (ii) the delineation Aldrich Garden share the recommendations must be community facilities and the based on objective data of same needs with residents in population distribution. the area of Aldrich Bay, and Community services hence have a weaker sense of provided by DC members belonging towards C07 (A is not the relevant factor Kung Ngam); of consideration.

 there are different types of residence in C07 (A Kung Ngam). It is difficult for the DC member to serve residents of different social standings. As the DC member of the above DCCA also has different stances, it is hard to reach a consensus on community issues; and

 frequent changes in DCCA

C. Eastern District - 60 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O boundaries make it hard for electors to adapt to and seek help from DC members.

7 C06 – 1 - Proposes to transfer Eastway This proposal is not accepted Shaukeiwan Towers from C07 (A Kung because: Ngam) to C06 (Shaukeiwan) C07 – because: (i) the populations of C06 A Kung (Shaukeiwan) and C07 (A Ngam  the proposal can even out the Kung Ngam) will fall populations of the above within the statutory DCCAs so that the DC permissible range. members of the two DCCAs According to the can provide better services established working for residents; principles, adjustments to their existing boundaries  there will be new residential are not required; developments with population intake in C07 (A (ii) the projected population Kung Ngam) starting from figures as at 30 June 2019 2019, but the increase in are used for the population may not have delineation exercise for been accurately reflected in the 2019 DC Ordinary the population of the DCCA Election. As in the past, concerned; and the projected population figures are provided by  considering geographical the AHSG, set up factors and the preservation specially for the purpose of community integrity and of the delineation exercise local ties, the above proposal under the Working Group is the most beneficial one to on Population the two DCCAs. Distribution Projection in the PlanD. The current population distribution projections are derived by using scientific and systematic methodology based on the results of the 2016 population by-census carried out by the C&SD as well as the up-to-date official data kept by the relevant

C. Eastern District - 61 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O government departments. Members of the AHSG are all professional departments which all along have been responsible for territory-wide population census and projections on population distribution. They possess the most up-to-date information on the population and land and housing development, and the data are highly-accepted generally. The EAC has all along relied on the statistical figures provided by the AHSG, which are the only data available for the delineation exercise; and

(iii) the delineation recommendations must be based on objective data of population distribution. Community services provided by DC members is not the relevant factor of consideration.

8 C09 – 1 - Considers it appropriate in the This proposal is not accepted Tsui Wan provisional recommendations to because in accordance with the make relevant changes to EACO, the EAC must follow C10 – DCCAs in Chai Wan and Siu the number of elected seats Yan Lam Sai Wan with populations stipulated for each DC under below the statutory permissible the DCO in delineating the C11 – lower limit given that the DCCA boundaries. As this Siu Sai number of elected seats cannot proposal made in the Wan be changed. However, in the representation is related to the long run, proposes to reduce the enactment of the primary number of DCCAs in Chai Wan legislation, which does not fall

C. Eastern District - 62 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O C12 – and Siu Sai Wan from 11 to under the purview of the EAC, nine, including the deletion of the EAC has referred the C33 (Tsui Tak) and C35 (Kai relevant view to the CMAB for C13 – Hiu) and re-delineation of C09 consideration. Wan Tsui (Tsui Wan), C10 (Yan Lam), C11 (Siu Sai Wan), C12 (King C14 – Yee), C13 (Wan Tsui), C14 Fei Tsui (Fei Tsui), C31 (Hing Man), C32 (Lok Hong) and C34 (Yue C31 – Wan) so that the populations of Hing these DCCAs will be closer to Man the population quota. Details are as follows: C32 – Lok  to delete C35 (Kai Hiu) and Hong transfer the relatively independent Kai Tsui Court C33 – to C12 (King Yee); Tsui Tak  to transfer Sui Shing House C34 – and Sui Fat House of Siu Sai Yue Wan Wan Estate from C11 (Siu Sai Wan) to C10 (Yan Lam); C35 – Kai Hiu  to merge Siu Sai Wan Estate (except Sui Shing House and Sui Fat House) in C11 (Siu Sai Wan) and C35 (Kai Hiu) with Hiu Tsui Court in C35 (Kai Hiu) to form C11 (Siu Sai Wan);

 to transfer the seven housing blocks at Hong Ping Street from C09 (Tsui Wan) and C11 (Siu Sai Wan) to C34 (Yue Wan) as the seven blocks have closer community ties with C34 (Yue Wan);

 to transfer Winner Centre, Walton Estate, Gold Mine

C. Eastern District - 63 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O Building and Yee Tsui Court from C33 (Tsui Tak) to C09 (Tsui Wan); and Bayview Park and Koway Court from C33 (Tsui Tak) to C32 (Lok Hong);

 to delete C33 (Tsui Tak);

 to transfer Hing Man Estate from C31 (Hing Man) to C14 (Fei Tsui);

 to merge Moon Wah Building, Man Wah Building and Fire Services Department Married Quarters in C14 (Fei Tsui) with Hing Wah (1) Estate, Wah Tai Mansion and Chai Wan Cinema Building in C31 (Hing Man) and New Jade Garden and Wah Ha Estate in C33 (Tsui Tak) to form C31 (Hing Man); and

 to retain the DCCA boundary of C13 (Wan Tsui).

9 C09 – - 1 Proposes to transfer Yee Tsui This proposal is not accepted Tsui Wan Court from C33 (Tsui Tak) to because according to the C09 (Tsui Wan) and retain the proposal made in the C11 – DCCA boundary of C11 (Siu representation, the population Siu Sai Sai Wan). of C33 (Tsui Tak) (11 735) Wan will be below the statutory permissible lower limit C33 – (-29.30%). Tsui Tak

10 C16 – 1 - Proposes to transfer eight The proposal made in the Braemar DCCAs namely C16 (Braemar representation involves Hill Hill), C17 (Fortress Hill), C18 alteration of administrative

C. Eastern District - 64 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O C17 – (City Garden), C19 (Provident), district boundaries, which does Fortress C20 (Fort Street), C21 (Kam not fall under the purview of Hill Ping), C22 (Tanner) and C23 the EAC. The EAC has (Healthy Village) (except referred this view to the C18 – Model Housing Estate) from Government for consideration. City the Eastern District to the Wan Garden Chai District because:

C19 –  the populations of the Provident Eastern District and the Wan Chai District have decreased. C20 – Based on the aggregate Fort populations, both of their Street total number of elected seats are two more than their C21 – entitlement, resulting in too Kam Ping many DC members. It leads to a wastage of C22 – resources and adverse impact Tanner on efficiency;

C23 –  the difference between the Healthy numbers of DC members of Village Wan Chai DC and Eastern DC is 22, to which appropriate adjustment should be made;

 the above DCCAs have already been transformed into commercial districts in recent years and become the extensions of Wan Chai and Causeway Bay; and

 the resources of the two administrative districts can be evened out after adjustments, which will be beneficial to the development of district administration.

C. Eastern District - 65 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O 11 C17 – 1 - Proposes to transfer the area in This proposal is not accepted Fortress the south of Electric Road from because the populations of Hill C18 (City Garden) to C17 C17 (Fortress Hill) and C18 (Fortress Hill) because there (City Garden) will fall within C18 – will be new residential the statutory permissible City developments in C18 (City range. According to the Garden Garden) and C19 (Provident) established working principles, and the populations and adjustments to their existing workload of DC members will boundaries are not required. increase significantly.

12 C19 – 1 - As the population of C19 This proposal is not accepted Provident (Provident) is approaching the because the populations of statutory permissible upper C19 (Provident), C23 (Healthy C23 – limit, while that of C24 (Quarry Village) and C24 (Quarry Bay) Healthy Bay) is approaching the will fall within the statutory Village statutory permissible lower permissible range. limit, proposes: According to the established C24 – working principles, Quarry  to transfer Mansion adjustments to their existing Bay Building, Lido Apartments boundaries are not required. and Wah Shun Gardens from C23 (Healthy Village) to C24 (Quarry Bay); and

 to move the DCCA boundary between C19 (Provident) and C23 (Healthy Village) westwards from Kam Hong Street to Shu Kuk Street.

13 C21 – 1 - Proposes to transfer The Tanner This proposal is not accepted Kam Ping Hill from C22 (Tanner) to C21 because: (Kam Ping) because: C22 – (i) the populations of C21 Tanner  Fleur Pavilia in C22 (Kam Ping) and C22 (Tanner) was completed in (Tanner) will fall within the third quarter of 2018 and the statutory permissible there has been a gradual range. According to the population intake. established working However, the population principles, adjustments to increase has not been their existing boundaries included in the population of are not required;

C. Eastern District - 66 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O the DCCA; (ii) the projected population figures as at 30 June 2019  the proposal can even out the are used for the populations of the above two delineation exercise for DCCAs and render resource the 2019 DC Ordinary allocation to neighbouring Election. As in the past, areas more even; and the projected population figures are provided by  for residents of The Tanner the AHSG, set up Hill, except a roadway which specially for the purpose passes through C22 of the delineation exercise (Tanner), most of the under the Working Group residents only use Kam Ping on Population Distribution Street and Shu Kuk Street Projection in the PlanD. for access to the housing The current population estate. The community distribution projections needs of residents of The are derived by using Tanner Hill are closer to scientific and systematic those of C21 (Kam Ping). methodology based on the results of the 2016 population by-census carried out by the C&SD as well as the up-to-date official data kept by the relevant government departments. Members of the AHSG are all professional departments which all along have been responsible for territory-wide population census and projections on population distribution. They possess the most up-to-date information on the population and land and housing development, and the data are highly-accepted generally. The EAC has all along relied on the statistical figures provided by the AHSG, which are the only

C. Eastern District - 67 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O data available for the delineation exercise; and

(iii) the delineation recommendations must be based on objective data of population distribution. Arrangement on district administration matters is not the relevant factor of consideration.

14 C29 – 1 - Agrees to the provisional The supporting view is noted. Lower recommendations on the Yiu Tung transfer of Yiu On House from C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) to C30 C30 – (Upper Yiu Tung) because the Upper population of C30 (Upper Yiu Yiu Tung Tung) has been decreasing over the years and approaching the statutory permissible lower limit. The DCCA only includes six public housing and Home Ownership Scheme estates, and geographically Yiu On House is only separated from C30 (Upper Yiu Tung) by a road.

15 C29 – 30^ - Object to the transfer of Yiu On This proposal is not accepted Lower 1 House from C29 (Lower Yiu because: Yiu Tung Tung) to C30 (Upper Yiu Tung) and consider that the (i) according to the proposal C30 – boundaries of the two DCCAs made in the Upper should remain unchanged. representations, the Yiu Tung population of C30 (Upper Two representations consider Yiu Tung) (12 166) will that: be below the statutory permissible lower limit  the provisional (-26.71%); recommendations will break

^Of which, 28 are template letters.

C. Eastern District - 68 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O community integrity of C29 (ii) C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) (Lower Yiu Tung); and C30 (Upper Yiu Tung) both belong to Yiu  geographically, Yiu Hing Tung Estate. There is no Road is the dividing line for sufficient objective Yiu Tung Estate: the information and hill-facing side is “Upper justification to prove that Yiu Tung” and the the provisional sea-facing side is “Lower recommendations will Yiu Tung”. The transfer of break the community Yiu On House, which integrity of C29 (Lower belongs to the sea-facing Yiu Tung); and side, alone to another DCCA will confuse the residents (iii) the delineation and break the community recommendations must be integrity; based on objective data of population distribution.  residents of Yiu On House Arrangements on district usually conduct their administration matters activities in the old housing and polling station are not area at the foot of the hill the relevant factors of and seldom use facilities in consideration. The EAC C30 (Upper Yiu Tung); has referred the relevant view concerning polling  residents of Yiu On House station to the REO for have always been included in consideration. C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) and hence have an ingrained concept of “Lower Yiu Tung”. Changing their DCCA and polling station will easily cause confusion; and

 wish to follow the arrangement of 2015 DC Ordinary Election that residents of Yiu On House will not be allocated to vote at Yiu Wa House in 2019 DC Ordinary Election.

C. Eastern District - 69 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O 16 C29 – 5 - Propose to transfer Yiu Fung This proposal is not accepted Lower House and Yiu On House because: Yiu Tung together from C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) to C30 (Upper Yiu (i) the affected population C30 – Tung). Reasons are under the proposal made Upper summarised as follows: in the representations Yiu Tung (2 028) will be larger than  according to the provisional that in the provisional recommendations, the recommendations (983) population of C30 (Upper by 1 045; Yiu Tung) is still relatively low and hence able to absorb (ii) Yiu Fung House and the population of Yiu Fung other buildings of Yiu House at the same time; Tung Estate in C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) belong  the population of Yiu Tung to the same housing Estate is ageing and that of estate. They are C30 (Upper Yiu Tung) has interconnected by been decreasing; footbridge and roads and therefore have certain  Yiu On House and Yiu Fung degree of connection. House were completed in the Geographically, Yiu Fung same period and adjacent to House will not be isolated each other. in the provisional Geographically, they are recommendations; and closer to other parts of C30 (Upper Yiu Tung) but further (iii) the delineation away from other buildings of recommendations must be C29 (Lower Yiu Tung); based on objective data of population distribution.  the two blocks are situated Arrangements on district on the same platform and use administration matters or the same fire services access; community services provided by DC members  same as the residents of C30 are not the relevant (Upper Yiu Tung), residents factors of consideration. of the two housing blocks habitually take mini-buses and buses, and regard themselves as living in Upper Yiu Tung. Putting residents of both housing blocks into the same DCCA

C. Eastern District - 70 - C. Eastern District

Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O can facilitate DC member to handle the same traffic needs;

 retaining Yiu Fung House alone in C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) will isolate the residents of that housing block; and

 the proposal made in the representations will bring the populations of C29 (Lower Yiu Tung) and C30 (Upper Yiu Tung) closer to the population quota and the DCCA boundaries clearer, and can avoid causing confusion to members of the public about which DCCA they belong to.