DOCSLIB.ORG

Revisiting the Inflation Versus Deflation Debate and Taking A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revisiting the Inflation Versus Deflation Debate and Taking A RATES Revisiting The Inflation Versus Deflation Debate STRATEGY And Taking A Look At US Election Risk US and SG money market rates have floored. Improved liquidity seen in SORA products. Steeper yield curves driven by higher bond yields. Discussion 1: US inflation has undershot the Fed’s 2% target since 2019, the new AIT regime means a Fed that will be less sensitive to inflation upside in order to make up for the prior periods of undershooting. Discussion 2: A contested US election outcome is on our risk radar for 4Q. The ensuing “risk off” narrative will see yields pressured lower and a richer US dollar premium. Money Markets Funding markets in the US and locally have 1Y Swaps Forward Curves Vs. Spot largely found a floor over the past quarter. (Difference - %) We believe that liquidity conditions will be Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research maintained at accommodative levels since policy makers will want to avoid endangering 0.80 the nascent economic recovery by prematurely removing their support. At the same time, the 0.60 COVID-19 shock is also clearly less acute now which will argue against unleashing additional 0.40 floods of liquidity into markets at this point. 0.20 The likely scenario Forwards markets are priced for a more is for US and SG meaningful increase in yields beyond three 0.00 money market rates years. This also overlaps with the latest Fed to stay range bound dot-plots, and we do not have an argument -0.20 at prevailing levels against either. The likely scenario is for US and Spot 6M 1Y 18M 3Y 5Y until signs of economic SG money market rates to stay range bound US SI overheating emerges. at prevailing levels until signs of economic overheating emerges. Table A: Short Term Money Market Rates Heatmap 18-Sep-20 -1 Week -1 Month -3 Month -6 Month -1 Year SORA US 3M Libor SG 3M Sibor SG 3M Sor Source: UOB Global Economics & Markets Research Quarterly Global Outlook 4Q 2020 39 RATES STRATEGY UOB Global Economics & Markets Research The global transition The global transition towards risk free benchmark rates continues to make progress and in towards risk free Singapore we have seen a number of industry-first SORA cash products launched as well as the benchmark rates inaugural 6-month SORA floating rate note auction by the MAS. continues to make progress. In the SORA derivatives space, liquidity has also shown signs of improvement. For example, the total notional amount outstanding of SORA interest rate swaps cleared by the London Clearing House (LCH) has almost doubled to USD 0.86 billion in August compared to USD 0.44 billion in May. Another example of better liquidity conditions can be seen in the bid-ask spreads of the 1-year SORA interest rate swap. Volatility in the bid-ask spread has stabilized significantly since its inception in May and the spread has narrowed further to around 7bps since late August. LCH Cleared SORA Derivatives 1Y SORA OIS Bid-Ask Spread (%) (Notional USD Billions) Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets arch Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research 1.00 0.35 0.90 0.30 0.80 0.70 0.25 0.60 0.20 0.50 0.15 0.40 0.30 0.10 0.20 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.00 May 20 Jun 20 Jul 20 Aug 20 May 20 Jun 20 Jul 20 Aug 20 Sep 20 <1Y 1-2Y >2Y Our views on SORA’s central tendency anchored at around 10bps for 4Q2020. US and SG 3M US Libor forecast at 0.25% by end 2020 and remains at 0.25% by end 2021. money markets 3M SG Sibor forecast at 0.35% by end 2020 and remains at 0.35% by end 2021. 3M SG Sor forecast at 0.25% by end 2020 and remains at 0.25% by end 2021. Bond Markets Over the course of 3Q 2020, the US real rates yield curve continued to steepen further US 5s30s Real vs. Nominal Curve (%) and this has narrowed the gap against the Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research nominal yield curve back to levels prevailing before COVID-19 made its presence felt on 1.40 1.20 financial markets. In the case of the 5s30s UST 1.20 1.00 versus TIPS, the gap between the two curves 1.00 narrowed by 30bps in 2Q followed by a further 0.80 24bps in 3Q (as of 17 Sep). 0.80 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.00 -0.20 0.00 Sep 19 Dec 19 Mar 20 Jun 20 Gap - RHS UST TIPS Quarterly Global Outlook 4Q 2020 40 UOB Global Economics & Markets Research RATES STRATEGY Table B: Longer Term Bond Yield Heatmap 18 Sep 20 -1 Week -1 Month -3 Month -6 Month -1 Year 10Y UST 10Y SGS 2s10s UST Curve 2s10s SGS Curve Source: UOB Global Economics & Markets Research Additional convergence between the nominal and real yield curves in 4Q seem to be an unlikely scenario in our view, given that virtually all of the COVID-19 safe haven premium has already been unwound. That said, there may still be scope for a steeper real yield curve when vaccines become widely available and if the recovery in economic activity can find another gear off the back of the massive fiscal and monetary support that is already in play. We see room for bond Steeper yield curves will be driven by higher bond yields given that the front end of the curve has yields to reprice higher already hit the zero bound. Bond markets have also been a beneficiary of the COVID-19 liquidity when liquidity support injections which is a reason why we are seeing disconnects between bond yields and the typical measures are gradually indicators of economic recovery such as PMIs and prices of industrial metals. Therefore, we see pulled back alongside room for bond yields to reprice higher when liquidity support measures are gradually pulled back the resumption of alongside the resumption of economic activity. economic activity. 10Y UST And ISM Manufacturing 10Y UST and Industrial Metal Index Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research 3.50 65 2.50 125 120 3.00 60 2.00 115 2.50 55 1.50 110 2.00 50 105 1.50 1.00 100 45 1.00 95 0.50 0.50 40 90 0.00 35 0.00 85 Oct 15 Feb 17 Jun 18 Oct 19 Sep 19 Feb 20 Jul 20 10Y UST (%) 10Y UST (%) ISM Manufacturing (Index) - RHS Bloomberg Industrial Metals (Index) - RHS Our views on 10Y UST forecast at 1.05% by end 2020 and 1.20% by end 2021. US and SG 10Y SGS forecast at 1.15% by end 2020 and 1.30% by end 2021. bond markets AIT regime is supportive of a steeper yield curve, but unlimited QE sits in the background ready to tamp down on excessive gains. Quarterly Global Outlook 4Q 2020 41 RATES STRATEGY UOB Global Economics & Markets Research DISCUSSION 1: The US Fed unveiled its new strategy of US Core PCE Deviations From 2% Fed Target Average Average Inflation Targeting (AIT) on 27 Aug (%) and this marked an important shift in its policy Inflation Target Source: Bloomberg, UOB Global Economics & Markets Research conduct going forward. In essence, AIT allows policy makers at the Fed more flexibility in 0.8 managing their price stability mandate of a 0.6 long run 2% inflation rate. What AIT entails is 0.4 a shift in the Fed’s reaction function to being 0.2 more tolerant of inflation rate running over 0.0 its 2% target when it comes off the back of a -0.2 period where it has undershot. -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1.0 -1.2 1995 2001 2007 2013 2019 Going forward under Using the Fed’s favoured measure of inflation, the core personal consumption expenditures price the new AIT regime, index (core PCE), inflation outcomes have persistently undershot the 2% target since 2019 at an the Fed will be less average of -0.43%. Therefore, going forward under the new AIT regime, the Fed will be less eager eager to tamp down to tamp down on higher inflation outcomes (within a reasonable tolerance of up to perhaps 2.50%). on higher inflation So, even with signs of an economic rebound from the initial COVID-19 hit, the “lower for longer” outcomes. rates narrative remains validated by AIT. Inflation vs. A Fed that is more tolerant of inflation does not mean that they will get inflation. This debate over Deflation Debate whether the future is an inflationary or deflationary world has been a perennial one but based on the deviation of core PCE from the Fed’s 2% target it would seem that fears of runaway inflation have largely been unfounded since 1995. Proponents of the Nonetheless, it is useful to remind ourselves on the logic that underpins both camps. Proponents inflationary narrative tend of the inflationary narrative tend to rely on two general arguments, the first is the expansion of to rely on two general the Fed balance sheet and the second is fiscal deficits. Both arguments hinge on the assumption arguments, the first is that the economic engine will eventually respond to growth oriented policies and through the the expansion of the Fed multiplier effects, as well as policy reaction functions which have historically been slow to tighten, balance sheet and the we would eventually reach a situation of excessive credit creation that results in higher inflation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interbank Offered Rates (Ibors) and Alternative Reference Rates (Arrs)
    VERSION: 24 SEPTEMBER 2020 Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs) and Alternative Reference Rates (ARRs) The following table has been compiled on the basis of publicly available information. Whilst reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information in the table is accurate as at the date that the table was last revised, no warranty or representation is given as to the information in the table. The information in the table is a summary, is not exhaustive and is subject to change. Key Multiple-rate approach (IBOR + RFR) Moving to RFR only IBOR only Basis on Development of Expected/ Expected fall which forward-looking likely fall- back rate to IBOR is Expected ARR? back rate to the ARR (if 3 Expected being Date from date by the IBOR2 applicable) discontinu continued which which ation date (if Alternative ARR will replaceme for IBOR applicable Reference be nt of IBOR Currency IBOR (if any) )1 Rate published is needed ARS BAIBAR TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC (Argentina) 1 Information in this column is taken from Financial Stability Board “Reforming major interest rate benchmarks” progress reports and other publicly available English language sources. 2 This column sets out current expectations based on publicly available information but in many cases no formal decisions have been taken or announcements made. This column will be revisited and revised following publication of the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol. References in this column to a rate being “Adjusted” are to such rate with adjustments being made (i) to reflect the fact that the applicable ARR may be an overnight rate while the IBOR rate will be a term rate and (ii) to add a spread.
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing the LIBOR with a Transparent and Reliable Index of Interbank Borrowing: Comments on the Wheatley Review of LIBOR Initial Discussion Paper
    Replacing the LIBOR with a Transparent and Reliable Index of Interbank Borrowing: Comments on the Wheatley Review of LIBOR Initial Discussion Paper 6 September 2012 * Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz and David S. Evans *Abrantes-Metz is Adjunct Associate Professor at the Stern School of Business, New York University and a Principal of Global Economics Group; Evans is Executive Director of the Jevons Institute for Competition Law and Economics and Visiting Professor at the University College London, Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and Chairman, Global Economics Group. The authors thank John H. Cochrane, Albert D. Metz, Richard Schmalensee, and Brian Smith for helpful insights. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to affiliated institutions or their clients. 1 I. Summary 1. The Wheatley Review released its Initial Discussion Paper (the “Discussion Paper”) on August 10, 2012 and has sought comments on its preliminary findings and recommendations on how to reform the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).1 2. This submission presents an alternative to the LIBOR that would in our view: a. Eliminate or significantly reduce the severe defects in the LIBOR which lead the Discussion Paper to conclude that continuing with the current system is “not a viable option;”2 b. Provide a transparent and reliable measure of interbank lending rates during normal times as well as financial crises; c. Minimize disruptions to the market; and, d. Provide parties relying on the LIBOR with a standard that would maintain continuity with the LIBOR. 3. This alternative, which we call the “Committed” LIBOR (CLIBOR), would: a.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBOR Transition Key Dates
    IBOR Reform Key Dates July 2021 Disclaimer J.P.Morgan does not provide legal, tax, financial or accounting advice and clients should consider any loan amendments and the appropriateness of the fallbacks incorporated therein together with their legal, tax, financial and accounting advisers, taking into consideration their own particular circumstances and the fallbacks that may be applicable in any related products. Please visit the following link for JPMorgan disclosures: https://www.jpmorgan.com/global/disclosures Key IBOR Transition Dates Currency IBOR Settings Permanent Cessation Date1 Cease Trading New IBOR Contracts Select Milestones LIBOR (1-week and 2-month) December 31, 2021 FRB/FDIC/OCC: The agencies encourage banks to cease entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate as soon as practicable and in any event by December 31st, 2021. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC) Interest Rate Benchmark Reform Subcommittee: ◼ Recommends that on July 26th, 2021 and thereafter, that USD End 2021 (All Products) interdealer trading conventions switch from LIBOR to the LIBOR (Overnight, 1-month, 3- June 30, 2023 Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) for USD linear month, 6-month, 12-month) interest rate swaps. This is referred to as “SOFR First”. ◼ The SOFR First initiative also recommends keeping interdealer brokers’ screens for LIBOR linear swaps available until October 22nd, 2021, but for information purposes only. After this date, these screens should be turned off.
    [Show full text]
  • APAC IBOR Transition Benchmarking Study
    R E P O R T APAC IBOR Transition Benchmarking Study. July 2020 Banking & Finance. 0 0 sia-partners.com 0 0 Content 6 • Executive summary 8 • Summary of APAC IBOR transitions 9 • APAC IBOR deep dives 10 Hong Kong 11 Singapore 13 Japan 15 Australia 16 New Zealand 17 Thailand 18 Philippines 19 Indonesia 20 Malaysia 21 South Korea 22 • Benchmarking study findings 23 • Planning the next 12 months 24 • How Sia Partners can help 0 0 Editorial team. Maximilien Bouchet Domitille Mozat Ernest Yuen Nikhilesh Pagrut Joyce Chan 0 0 Foreword. Financial benchmarks play a significant role in the global financial system. They are referenced in a multitude of financial contracts, from derivatives and securities to consumer and business loans. Many interest rate benchmarks such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) are calculated based on submissions from a panel of banks. However, since the global financial crisis in 2008, there was a notable decline in the liquidity of the unsecured money markets combined with incidents of benchmark manipulation. In July 2013, IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks have been published to improve their robustness and integrity. One year later, the Financial Stability Board Official Sector Steering Group released a report titled “Reforming Major Interest Rate Benchmarks”, recommending relevant authorities and market participants to develop and adopt appropriate alternative reference rates (ARRs), including risk- free rates (RFRs). In July 2017, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), announced that by the end of 2021 the FCA would no longer compel panel banks to submit quotes for LIBOR. And in March 2020, in response to the Covid-19 outbreak, the FCA stressed that the assumption of an end of the LIBOR publication after 2021 has not changed.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBOR Transition Market Update: July 16
    LIBOR Transition Market update: July 16 - 31, 2020 518 days to December 31, 2021 1 - Highlights - €STR discounting switch in the books 1 Highlights — SOFR up next €STR discounting switch in the books — SOFR up next - ECB report: banks generally behind What happened? A key milestone in the transition to new schedule RFRs in the Euro markets has been completed, as the central - ARRC’s syndicated loan conventions: counterparty (CCP) clearinghouses have switched from Choose your own adventure? EONIA to €STR as the rate for calculation of price alignment interest (the interest paid on collateral) for EUR-denominated - EC legislative proposal to address interest rate swaps and consequently discounting future cash legacy contracts that cannot be flows. Indications are that the switch was accomplished transitioned without major issues. - ECB’s plans to publish compound €STR The eyes of the financial world now turn to the USD averages derivatives markets, as market participants prepare for the corresponding switch for cleared USD interest rate derivatives - SIBOR no more? SORA proposed as from the effective federal funds rate (EFFR) to SOFR, main benchmark in Singapore scheduled for the weekend of October 17, 2020. At the CFTC’s last Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC) 2 – RFR adoption: Derivatives meeting, the subcommittee on interest rate benchmark reform delivered a report summarizing the learnings from a recent - Futures and options tabletop exercise on the discounting switch conducted earlier - Swaps trading this year: - Enhanced education is needed for all involved parties. 3 – RFR adoption: Cash products - Risk mitigation strategies should be considered in advance of the discounting switch.
    [Show full text]
  • My Company Has an Existing Loan That References SOR and Matures After End 2021
    PUBLIC FRENQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FAQs FOR CORPORATES LOANS – EXISTING/LEGACY Q1: My company has an existing loan that references SOR and matures after end 2021. What should I do about this? There is no immediate impact on your loan at this juncture, and your bank will be reaching out to you in due course to assist with the transition. However, to prepare for the upcoming transition, you are encouraged to review the terms and conditions of your loan contract to understand the implications and the actions required. Q2. Can my bank just replace my SOR loan pricing to SIBOR (or enhanced SIBOR)? Your bank will be writing to you at the appropriate time to consider different options. You will have the ability to choose the right loan package that best meets your needs. You will also need to consider if replacing a SOR loan with other benchmarks impacts your related transactions (e.g. hedges) and the corresponding accounting and tax implications. SORA and SIBOR are different SGD benchmarks that are determined on a different basis. In relation to the usage of SIBOR, ABS Benchmarks Administration Pte Ltd (ABS Co) is conducting a transitional testing for the enhanced SIBOR, and will provide an update after the transitional testing is completed in 2H 2020. The results of the transitional testing will be considered by the Steering Committee for SOR Transition to SORA (SC-STS), which will issue industry guidance in due course. While SORA is not commonly used in the loan market, it is not new and has been published daily by the MAS since 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.9.2013 SWD(2013) 336 Final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying Th
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.9.2013 SWD(2013) 336 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts {COM(2013) 641 final} {SWD(2013) 337 final} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................1 2. PROCEDURAL ISSUES AND CONSULTATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES....................................................................................2 2.1. CONSULTATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES ..................................................................................................................................2 2.2. STEERING GROUP...............................................................................................................................................................2 2.3. IMPACT ASSESSMENT BOARD ...............................................................................................................................................3 3. POLICY CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................................................3 3.1. THE CURRENT EU LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ON BENCHMARKS ......................................................................................................3 3.2. NATURE
    [Show full text]
  • Timelines to Cease Issuance of Sor and Sibor-Linked Financial Products
    TIMELINES TO CEASE ISSUANCE OF SOR AND SIBOR-LINKED FINANCIAL PRODUCTS 31 March 2021 Steering Committee for SOR & SIBOR Transition to SORA 1 1 Background and Aim 1.1 On 30 August 2019, the Association of Banks in Singapore and the Singapore Foreign Exchange Market Committee (“ABS-SFEMC”) issued a consultation report, which identified the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (“SORA”) as the alternative risk-free rate (“RFR”) to replace the Swap Offer Rate (“SOR”) in SGD interest rate markets.1 This recognised that SOR, which relies on USD LIBOR in its computation methodology, would be discontinued when USD LIBOR is discontinued after end-2021. To oversee this industry-wide interest rate benchmark transition from SOR to SORA, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”) established the Steering Committee for SOR Transition to SORA (“SC- STS”)2, to provide strategic direction on industry proposals to develop new products and markets based on SORA, and engage with stakeholders to seek feedback and raise awareness on issues related to the transition from SOR to SORA.3 1.2 On 27 October 2020, SC-STS set out market guidance on Timelines to Cease Issuance of SOR- linked Financial Products. 4 The industry had made good progress in establishing the market conventions for new SORA-referencing products, implementing contractual fallbacks for SOR- referencing products, as well as promoting take-up of SORA products. With these in place, the SC-STS set out guidance to support a coordinated shift away from the use of SOR in financial products, and to concurrently accelerate the usage of SORA. The guidance included timelines for market participants to: (a) Cease the usage of SOR in new cash market products; (b) Be ready to offer SORA-based products in scale to customers; (c) Wind down gross exposures in SOR derivatives; and (d) Implement fallbacks in cash and derivatives contracts that reference SOR.
    [Show full text]
  • IBOR Transition Frequently Asked Questions
    IBOR transition Frequently asked questions This FAQ provides you with recent and upcoming developments on the transition of interest rate benchmarks. This guide should not be used in the provision of legal, financial, tax, accounting or other advice. Consult your advisors on the implications of these changes. This FAQ is not intended to address all financial and other risks that may arise from these changes. General 1. Why are some interest rate benchmarks being reformed or discontinued? 2. What are the latest expectations on the timing of cessation of LIBOR? 3. What are alternative reference rates? 4. What are the challenges of using RFRs? 5. What are the plans for forward-looking term RFRs? Credit Adjustment Spread (CAS) 6. What is a Credit Adjustment Spread (CAS) and why is it needed? 7. What are the common approaches for calculating a CAS? 8. Are there differences between the use of CAS approaches on active transition versus fallback transition? Cash and Loan products 9. What needs to happen to cash products that mature after the relevant LIBOR cessation date? 10. What are some of the major challenges on the active transition of loan products? 11. What are fallbacks? What are some of the major issues? 12. How does the amendment approach differ from a “hardwired” or “switch agreement”? 13. What remedies are being considered for ‘tough’ legacy financial instruments? 14. What replacement rates have working groups recommended for LIBOR cash products? 15. What approach are the various trade associations taking to support the transition to RFRs? Derivative products 16. How is ISDA approaching LIBOR’s expected demise regarding a replacement rate? 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Sibor Reform and the Future Landscape for Sgd Interest Rate Benchmarks
    SIBOR REFORM AND THE FUTURE LANDSCAPE FOR SGD INTEREST RATE BENCHMARKS 29 July 2020 Association of Banks in Singapore Singapore Foreign Exchange Market Committee Steering Committee for SOR Transition to SORA 1 PREFACE AND DISCLAIMER This report reviews the results of the transitional testing of a new waterfall methodology for the SGD Singapore Interbank Offered Rates (“SIBOR”), and examines the options for the future landscape for SGD interest rate benchmarks. The report identifies the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (“SORA”) – particularly Compounded SORA – as the most suitable and robust alternative to SIBOR, and seeks feedback on several issues relating to the proposed transition to SORA. The Association of Banks in Singapore (“ABS”), ABS Benchmarks Administration Co Pte Ltd (“ABS Co.”), the Singapore Foreign Exchange Market Committee (“SFEMC”), the Steering Committee for SOR Transition to SORA (“SC-STS”), and any persons or entities acting on their behalf, do not give any warranties or representations concerning any data or information contained herein. 2 Contents 1 SIBOR Reform and the SOR-to-SORA Transition ................................................................ 4 1.1 SIBOR Reform and Transitional Testing ...................................................................... 4 1.2 SOR-to-SORA Transition and its Implications for SIBOR Reform ................................ 8 2 Future Landscape for SGD Interest Rate Benchmarks ..................................................... 11 2.1 SGD Interest Rate Benchmarks – Current
    [Show full text]
  • Act Now to Transition to SORA
    Jacqueline Loh: Act now to transition to SORA Keynote speech by Ms Jacqueline Loh, Deputy Managing Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, at The Association of Banks in Singapore’s Roundtable Session on SGD Interest Rate Landscape Changes, Singapore, 9 September 2020. * * * 1 Good morning to everyone. First, let me thank Ai Boon and her team in ABS1 for organising this Roundtable session, and inviting me to speak. It is heartening to see the large number of participants comprising banks, as well as corporates, SME and retail customers joining this virtual session. This reflects the importance of the topic that we’re discussing today – the shifts in the interest rate benchmark landscape, and what we must do in preparation. 2 Interest rates in Singapore are determined by global developments given our exchange rate centred monetary policy framework. Against that, robust market-driven interest rate benchmarks, play an important role in the domestic financial system and the broader economy. Similar to other economies, interest rate benchmarks reflect the cost of borrowing in underlying markets. They are used widely by – banks, to price loans to individuals and businesses; financial market participants, in pricing financial products such as bonds, floating rate notes and interest rate swaps; and corporates, as a discount rate for financial reporting of its assets. 3 In Singapore, SIBOR and SOR2 have served as the key interest rate benchmarks in Singapore Dollar (SGD) financial markets for decades. They meet the needs of different user groups, with SOR used in pricing of bonds and loans to large institutions with hedging requirements, as SOR is also the reference benchmark in SGD derivatives, while SIBOR is mainly referenced in banking products for smaller corporates and retail customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Current State of Alternative Reference Rates in Asia-Pacific • October 2020
    Current State of Alternative Reference Rates in Asia-Pacific • October 2020 SOUTH KOREA In June 2019, Koreaʼs Financial Services Commission and the Bank JAPAN of Korea convened an industry task force to select an alternative In Japan, there are two competing rates: the existing to KIBOR (Korea Interbank Offered Rate), which is based on the benchmark, TIBOR (Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate), declining local certificate of deposit market. While the deadline for and TONAR (Tokyo Overnight Average Rate), which the selection was set as June 2020, no ARR has been selected as was recommended in December 2016 by the Bank of yet. Authorities, however, have indicated they will consider of Japan as the preferred replacement risk-free two candidates as the replacement risk-free rate for KIBOR: reference rate. However, Japan is witnessing a clear an overnight call rate or an overnight repo rate. March 2021 split between lenders and borrowers as to which rate is the new deadline to announce the ARR. should be used, with the former generally preferring TIBOR and the latter generally preferring TONAR. TIBOR, like LIBOR, is based on bankersʼ estimates of market interest rates, submitted daily but overseen by the Japanese Bankers Association. TONAR is an unsecured interbank overnight interest rate and is based on short-term transactions. THAILAND On April 2020, the Bank of Thailand and the Thai Bond Market Association began publication of THOR (Thai Overnight Repo Rate) as the alternative reference rate for BIBOR (Bangkok Interbank Offered Rate) and THBFIX (Thai Bhat Interest Rate Fixing). THOR is a risk-free overnight rate based on repo markets.
    [Show full text]