DOCSLIB.ORG

Check Our Catalog Book Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2020-2021 data-ai.design 2020-2021 2020-2021 2 Data+AI+Design pring 2021 Index 2021 02.1 Intro To Exquisite 2PM–6PM 3D Printing Lecture + Camella Dahn Gim Workshop (UCLA) About the program 6-7 03.04 Creative AI: From 6PM–7PM Expressive Mimicry Lecture To Critical Inquiry Events Angus Forbes (UC Santa Cruz) 01 Future Artifact Design 8-15 04.30 Exploring 02 Mobile App Design 16-25 10AM–12PM Machine Learning Applications For Workshop 03 Intro to Exquisite 3D Printing 26-29 Art and Design Angus Forbes (UC Santa Cruz) 04 Creative AI: From Expressive Mimicry to 30-31 Critical Inquiry 03.12 Artificial Natures // 05 Artificial Natures // Games of Life 32-35 10AM–11AM Games Of Life Lecture 06 I Learn Humanities by Making Art with AI 36-39 [Autonomous Complexity 12PM–3PM in Life & Machines: Happy Students! 40-41 Workshop Cellular Automata] Haru Ji (OCAD University) & Acknowledgements & Organizers 42 Graham Wakefield (York University) Fall 2020 04.0 I Learn Humanities By 2020 11.0 Future Artifact 6PM–7PM Making Art With AI 3PM–5PM Design Lecture Eunsu Kang (Carnegie Mellon University) Final Online Presentation From BFA Graphic Design Students, In collaboration with the Chemical and Engineering Department 04.0 Co-Creating Art With AI 12.11 Mobile App 11AM–2PM Using Machine Learning 12PM–2PM Design Workshop Eunsu Kang (Carnegie Mellon University) Final Online Presentation From BFA Graphic Design Students; Mentors: Bloomberg NYC Interaction Designers 4 5 About the program Series of Six Events 01 Future Artifact Design 02 Mobile App Sponsored by Artistic Excellence Programming Grant 2020-2021 Sep 22-Nov 5, 2020 Oct 29-Dec 11, 2020 from College of Humanities and the Arts, San José State University In collaboration with chemical and materials Mentors: Anthony Viviano, Linda Le, Lucy Chen engineering department and Prof. Ozgur Keles (interaction designers at Bloomberg HQ) Data + AI + Design is a series of workshops and accompanying lectures with support from many guest speakers in various disciplines, the chemical and materials engineering, and Bloomberg NYC. This program examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI), interactive media technology, interaction design, and data analysis in the intersection between design and engineering. SJSU students, faculty and guest speakers had chances to exchange ideas, discussed various topics about data and AI and explored various methodologies to create interactive design prototypes. The discussion on both workshops and lectures also shed light on the ways in which artists/designers are incorporating AI in their practices to explore post-information age themes such as the ethical issues of artificial intelligence, data-driven design, new user experience design in the development of AI, and possible solutions for environmental/social issues 03 Intro to Exquisite 3D Printing 04 Creative AI with support of AI. There were a total of six events throughout the 2020-2021 academic year. The guest Feb 19, 2021 Mar 4 and Apr 30, 2021 speakers include Haru Ji, Graham Wakefield, Dahn Gim, Angus Forbes and Eunsu Kang. Three interaction Guest speaker: Dahn Gim Guest speaker: Angus Forbes designers, Anthony Viviano, Linda Le and Lucy Chen from Bloomberg NYC were mentors for the mobile app design project. Prof. Ozgur Keles at the chemical and materials engineering department was a faculty advisor for the futuer artifact design project. 05 Artificial Natures // Games of Life 06 I Learn Humanities by Making Art with Mar 12 2021 AI Guest speaker: Haru Ji and Graham Wakefield Apr 7-9, 2021 Guest speaker: Eunsu Kang 6 7 01 Neo Glass Designers: Lydia Lim, Junhan Wang and Tianting Sun Engineers: Nicholas Schultz, Saket Future Artifact Design Metrani and Pouya Bayzaie With 3D Printing Technology Nowadays, we put the glass and plastic containers into the trash bin without a second thought. Inevitably, it will have a negative impact to our environment as well as the The future artifacts can be on any topic. Consider economy. What if we can use those wasted glass bottles making an artifact to solve an important social/ to make new containers, not only it will be recycled, but it environmental issue, thus your artifact can help people also reduces/replaces the use of the plastic products? and/or nature. Your artifact should be invented with future technology such as artificial intelligence, machine The purpose of our project is to solve this problem learning, augmented/virtual/mixed reality, robotics, by recycling the glass resources to create an ecofriendly haptic technology, future materials, smart display, and sustainable product. We will focus on the additive bioengineering, biometrics, 3d printing, etc. printing method to reform glass products using our new 3D glass printer. The glass will be melted into 3D glass FACULTY ADVISORS filament and then our machine will build it to the desire Once you choose an artifact, write up the concepts and Prof. Ozgur Keles (left) form. Therefore, we can turn the wasted glass into a new features of the artifact, and design the artifacts with Chemical and Materials Engineering, San Jose product that’s useful and also aesthetically appealing! State University images. Brainstorm ideas, design, functions of the artifact Prof. Yoon Chung Han (right) with your collaborators. Our mobile app will provide a series of printed Design, San Jose State University glass products for the customers to choose, such PARTICIPANTS as cup, bowl, wine glass, and decanter. They can also be customized, in which people can choose BFA Graphic Design students in DSGD 186 their owe favorite color, shapes, and personalized Engineering students in MatE 115 signatures or images. Through our new technology, we PROJECT DURATION can make the recycling process more fun and appealing. Also, our products and service will remind people the 4 Weeks project in Fall 2020 semester importance of recycling and saving sources. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Working in a group of 4-5 (2-3 engineering students and 2-3 design students), concept, plan, design, and propose an additive manufacturing technique, a small scrolling website, and mobile app design for an artifact from the future. This can be a digital device, product, additive manufacturing (3D printing) service technology, etc. that can help our lives, nature, and environments. Design or the proposed technology should be described from the manufacturing and materials point of view; such as processing, structure, property, and performance relationships. Furthermore, create user experience design and user interface design along with the device or product design. 8 9 Axolotl Scaffold Ecohut Designers: En Yu Ma and Phi Ho Designers: Miguel Morejon and Thanhthao Engineers: Jazmeen Ravendran Pillay, Van Lianne Posadas and Manpreet Dhariwal Engineers: Kyna Chen, Dan-Il Yoon and Dan Pham Although the technology of bio-print is developed, bio- print needs bio-ink, which is not easy to obtain. In our Our project seeks to address the polyethylene artifact, we upgrade the materials of the bio-ink. We focus terephthalate (PET) plastic waste problem experienced on different materials such as PCL, collagen, chitosan globally by trying to convert them into recycled PET and so on. The three basic kinds of materials used in (rPET) and virgin PET (vPET) which then can be used tissue regeneration are synthetic polymers, extracellular to make a portable and collapsible dome-like shelter. matrices, and bioceramics. Synthetic polymers such as Dubbed “ecoHUT”, our product can be used in natural polycaprolactone (PCL) which can be used in bone tissue, disaster situations as temporary emergency housings have good biocompatibility, tensile strength ratios and run by the government. EcoHUT also tries to address the have excellent resistance to corrosion and its associated issue of homelessness. EcoHut can be used to provide fatigue. In the graphic design part, we aim for stressing a more hospitable, portable and durable housing option materials of our product in the website and mobile to the homeless. The product is a origami-like, elliptical- app, so customers can rely on our service. We create a shaped dome consisting of two 3D-printed parts – a friendly interface with a simple, clear and straightforward collapsible frame with locking mechanisms to hold the layout for people to know what the 3D scaffold is, how extended poles in place and a weather-proof PET-based it functions, how they can purchase it and how the membrane. This combination using PET allows for materials can assist them. Users can customize their own ecoHUT to be collapsed into a small, lightweight size, scaffold both in our website or mobile app; also, they can making it very portable while also making it very resistant track their scaffold printing progress anytime. to weather and normal wear-and-tear – all thanks to the strong, lightweight properties of PET. This is an important factor as homeless people tend to move around a lot and guarantees them a solid choice for shelter. Vottle Designers: Diego Arreola and Maria Nieves Ortiz Coll Engineers: Treven Hunter and Safiah O’Neill Soda and water is sold in disposable plastic bottles which in a vacuum chamber, a heating and cooling chamber are most commonly made of polyethylene terephthalate to smooth and sanitize the bottle’s surfaces, and an (PET). Only a third of these bottles are recycled each year interactive user interface which will allow the and much of that material is not utilized. To contribute consumer to customize their product. to waste reduction, we propose a kiosk which recycles disposable bottles, creates filament, and 3D prints a Our design will have a simple interior and wide mouth vacuum insulated reusable bottle. to allow for easy cleaning, and heating and cooling the 3D printed product will smooth its inner surfaces The kiosk will have four main components: a recycling considerably, making it harder for bacteria to adhere to unit which will wash and break down the PET bottles and the surface.
Recommended publications
  • On the Human Role in Generative Art: a Case

    On the Human Role in Generative Art: a Case

    ON THE HUMAN ROLE IN GENERATIVE ART: A CASE STUDY OF AI-DRIVEN LIVE CODING ANTONIO POŠĆIĆ Independent Scholar [email protected] GORDAN KREKOVIĆ Visage Technologies [email protected] https://doi.org/10.34632/jsta.2020.9488 ABSTRACT The constant evolution of philosophical views on art is interwoven with trajectories of accelerating technological development. In the current vehement emergence of generative algorithms there is an immediate need for making sense of modern technologies that increasingly seem to step in the realm that has been reserved for humans – creativity. This paper aims to understand the role of the human in generative art by demystifying Vol. 12, n. 3 (2020): pp. 45-62 implications of black-box generative algorithms and their applications for artistic purposes. First, we present examples of current practice and research in generative art with a special interest in music that served as foundation for our work. Then, we introduce Anastatica (2020), a part performance, part installation built on the basis of data-driven generative live coding. Finally, we discuss the various implications of AI in art through a case study rooted in Anastatica’s development and performance. Here we trace the path from algorithms to intelligence, applying both musical and computer science theory to a practical case of generating a live coding musical performance, with special focus given to aesthetic, compositional, conceptual, and phenomenological implications. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, of the Journal of Science and Technology Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Generative art; Live coding; Generative music; Computer art. 46 1. INTRODUCTION In broad terms, artificial intelligence (AI) is any sort of intelligence exhibited by machines (Nilsson 1998).
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    Media-N | The Journal of the New Media Caucus 2019: Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 69–81 ISSN: 1942-017X Media-N | The Machines Wave Back CHAD M. EBY Assistant Professor, Herron School of Art + Design, IUPUI ABSTRACT This paper examines notions of autonomy and agency in the context of understanding artist and rules system relationships within an Autonomous Art System (AAS). The concept of Create / Read / Update / Delete is borrowed from computer engineering as a metaphor for a role-based (rather than medium-based) framework for classifying AASs and, combined with the discussion of autonomy and agency, forms the basis for a new taxonomic system of Autonomous Art Systems for analysis, categorization and comparison. “A chipped pebble is almost part of the hand it never leaves. A thrown spear declares a sort of independence the moment it is released.” – Isaac Asimov, “The machine and the robot” in Robot Visions “The machines aren’t very smart yet, but we’re teaching them this stuff all the time. We’re giving them eyes and ears and we’re giving them access to our world. We’re sharing our social spaces with them increasingly. They increasingly live like the render ghosts, on the borders of our world, and they’re starting to share it with (us). – James Bridle, “Waving at the Machines” INTRODUCTION The purpose of this paper is to propose a way to describe degrees of autonomy and agency in Autonomous Art Systems (hereafter, AAS) to aid in analysis, categorization and comparison of such systems, and to consider their boundary conditions in an art-making context.
  • The Creativity of Artificial Intelligence in Art

    The Creativity of Artificial Intelligence in Art

    The Creativity of Artificial Intelligence in Art Mingyong Cheng Duke University October 19th, 2020 Abstract New technologies, especially in the field of artificial intelligence, are dynamic in transforming the creative space. AI-enabled programs are rapidly contributing to areas like architecture, music, arts, science, and so on. The recent Christie's auction on the Portrait of Edmond has transformed the contemporary perception of A.I. art, giving rise to questions such as the creativity of this art. This research paper acknowledges the persistent problem, "Can A.I. art be considered as creative?" In this light, the study draws on the various applications of A.I., varied attitudes on A.I. art, and the processes of generating A.I. art to establish an argument that A.I. is capable of achieving artistic creativity. 1 Table of Contents Chapter One ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Defining Artificial Intelligence .............................................................................................. 8 2.3 Application of AI in Various Fields .................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 Music ............................................................................................................................
  • Byeong Sam Jeon

    Byeong Sam Jeon

    BYEONG SAM JEON Personal Website: www.bsjeon.net Organizational Website: www.koian.com Email: [email protected] Office: 82-2-2038-8290 Address: 7F Sinmyeong BD. 834-44, Yeoksam-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea BIOGRAPHY Byeong Sam Jeon is an internationally recognized artist, researcher, and educator working at the confluence of art and science. His interests include Telematic Culture, Robotic Art, Embodied Interaction, Physical Computing, Trans-Humanism, and STEAM Education. For a decade, Jeon has been invited to present his artwork and research worldwide including: SIGGRAPH (USA), ISIMD (Turkey), LIFE: Version of Science (Russia), ArtBots (Ireland), AsiaGraph (China), SALON (Cuba), Netfilmmakers (Denmark), Siggraph-ASIA (Singapore), DALSMA (Korea), and elsewhere. One of his well-known projects, 'Telematic Drum Circle' has gathered more than 300,000 Internet users and offline participants from 59 countries to perform tele-robotic sound improvisation together since it was premiered at the California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology in September 2007. Jeon, as a theater director, has produced the world-first robot musical 'Robotata' (2011), the main performance of Korea Science Fest ‘Science for Dream’ (2010), and the opening performance of the 60th International Astronautical Congress ‘Feast of Space’ (2009). As a curator, he directed the international new media art exhibition 'ThisAbility'(China), 'Machine Dreams'(Korea), 'Interactive Playground'(USA), and several others. Byeong Sam Jeon currently works as the
  • A Companion to Digital Art WILEY BLACKWELL COMPANIONS to ART HISTORY

    A Companion to Digital Art WILEY BLACKWELL COMPANIONS to ART HISTORY

    A Companion to Digital Art WILEY BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO ART HISTORY These invigorating reference volumes chart the influence of key ideas, discourses, and theories on art, and the way that it is taught, thought of, and talked about throughout the English‐speaking world. Each volume brings together a team of respected international scholars to debate the state of research within traditional subfields of art history as well as in more innovative, thematic configurations. Representing the best of the scholarship governing the field and pointing toward future trends and across disciplines, the Blackwell Companions to Art History series provides a magisterial, state‐ of‐the‐art synthesis of art history. 1 A Companion to Contemporary Art since 1945 edited by Amelia Jones 2 A Companion to Medieval Art edited by Conrad Rudolph 3 A Companion to Asian Art and Architecture edited by Rebecca M. Brown and Deborah S. Hutton 4 A Companion to Renaissance and Baroque Art edited by Babette Bohn and James M. Saslow 5 A Companion to British Art: 1600 to the Present edited by Dana Arnold and David Peters Corbett 6 A Companion to Modern African Art edited by Gitti Salami and Monica Blackmun Visonà 7 A Companion to Chinese Art edited by Martin J. Powers and Katherine R. Tsiang 8 A Companion to American Art edited by John Davis, Jennifer A. Greenhill and Jason D. LaFountain 9 A Companion to Digital Art edited by Christiane Paul 10 A Companion to Public Art edited by Cher Krause Knight and Harriet F. Senie A Companion to Digital Art Edited by Christiane Paul
  • TOBY JULIFF & TRAVIS COX the Post-Display Condition Of

    TOBY JULIFF & TRAVIS COX the Post-Display Condition Of

    Toby Juliff & Travis Cox, The Post-Display Condition of Contemporary Computer Art TOBY JULIFF & TRAVIS COX The Post-display Condition of Contemporary Computer Art ABSTRACT Recent exhibition attempts to recuperate and revise Conceptual Art — ‘Open Systems’ (2005), ‘Invisible: Art About the Unseen’ (2012) — have brought to the fore wider discursive concerns regarding coding, interfaces and artistic intentionality. Taking its lead from Rosalind Krauss’ seminal work on the post-medium condition, this paper argues that the continued privileging of interface/display-user inherent within artistic discourse belies a more nuanced reading of the critical relationship between artist and code. Furthermore, this paper explores new practices in Computer Art and its related theorisation by Tanaka-Ishii and Dominic Lopes, with a view to re-conceptualising the relationship between artistic intentionality, coding, interface and user input. Based on this re-conceptualisation we identify the ‘post- display condition of contemporary computer art’, a condition that neither privileges user- display communication, nor the space between code and user, but rather envelopes meaning production between all elements of an artwork. 1.1 Open Systems In 2005 an exhibition entitled ‘Open Systems: Rethinking Art c.1970’ opened at the Tate Modern with the intention of examining how international artists rethought the object of art in the late 1960s and early 1970s.1 Drawing together work from artists such as Carl Andre, John Baldessari, Lygia Clark and Sol LeWitt — much of it already iconic and enshrined within the histories of Conceptual Art — ‘Open Systems’ sought to evoke, revise and revitalise discursive histories of Minimalism, Post- Minimalism and early Conceptual Art.
  • Interactive Art: Delineations, Crossovers and Differences

    Interactive Art: Delineations, Crossovers and Differences

    GA2012 – XV Generative Art Conference Mag. Oliver Gingrich, Generative Art - Interactive Art: Delineations, Crossovers MA Fine Art and Differences Topic: Interactive Arts In digital art theory, the histories of generative art and interactive art are – Generative Arts considered fundamentally interrelated yet distinctively defined - mutually dependent, yet clearly distinguishable by their respective Authors: discourse domineering definitions. In the practise of digital art, a Mag. Oliver Gingrich, multitude of hybrid art forms challenge both definitions and allow for MA questions on the nature of both artistic currents. Both concepts share a University of long tradition in the arts, yet both concepts have been refined Bournemouth; Centre continuously by scholars and academics over the last decades. for Digital Entertainment Their discussion has recently gained further momentum as both art www.bournemouth.ac.uk forms received heightened attention in artistic institutional discourse, curatorial display and theoretic reception over the last decade. This Dr. Alain Renaud, paper focuses on the two neighbouring fields in the digital arts, their PhD., MSc. respective traditions, their demarcation lines and theoretic concepts as University of well as hybrid cross-overs of these art forms that challenge their current Bournemouth, Centre for definitions. Digital Entertainment References: [1] Renaud, A. (2011), Cueing and composing for long distance network music collaborations. Proceedings of AES 44th Conference on Audio Networking, 18-20 November 2011, University of California, San Diego, USA, November 2011. [2] Gingrich, O (2004) Limits der Computerkunst. http://derstandard.at/1404529/ Limits-der-Computerkunst. [3] Renaud, A., Around the world in five seconds. Challenges and opportunities in designing Sonic Travel. in Performing Technology: User Content and the New Digital Media, Cambridge Scholars, Analema Group: Eugenia Emets et al.
  • TOBY JULIFF & TRAVIS COX the Post-Display Condition Of

    TOBY JULIFF & TRAVIS COX the Post-Display Condition Of

    Toby Juliff & Travis Cox, The Post-Display Condition of Contemporary Computer Art TOBY JULIFF & TRAVIS COX The Post-display Condition of Contemporary Computer Art ABSTRACT Recent exhibition attempts to recuperate and revise Conceptual Art — ‘Open Systems’ (2005), ‘Invisible: Art About the Unseen’ (2012) — have brought to the fore wider discursive concerns regarding coding, interfaces and artistic intentionality. Taking its lead from Rosalind Krauss’ seminal work on the post-medium condition, this paper argues that the continued privileging of interface/display-user inherent within artistic discourse belies a more nuanced reading of the critical relationship between artist and code. Furthermore, this paper explores new practices in Computer Art and its related theorisation by Tanaka-Ishii and Dominic Lopes, with a view to re-conceptualising the relationship between artistic intentionality, coding, interface and user input. Based on this re-conceptualisation we identify the ‘post- display condition of contemporary computer art’, a condition that neither privileges user- display communication, nor the space between code and user, but rather envelopes meaning production between all elements of an artwork. 1.1 Open Systems In 2005 an exhibition entitled ‘Open Systems: Rethinking Art c.1970’ opened at the Tate Modern with the intention of examining how international artists rethought the object of art in the late 1960s and early 1970s.1 Drawing together work from artists such as Carl Andre, John Baldessari, Lygia Clark and Sol LeWitt — much of it already iconic and enshrined within the histories of Conceptual Art — ‘Open Systems’ sought to evoke, revise and revitalise discursive histories of Minimalism, Post- Minimalism and early Conceptual Art.
  • What Is Generative Art?

    What Is Generative Art?

    What is Generative Art? Gordon Monro www.gommog.com I describe myself as a generative artist. Generative art is not a widely known practice, so in this article I describe it, give examples from my own practice, and close with a few questions and my answers. What is generative art? Here is a widely used definition: Generative art refers to any art practice where the artist uses a system, such as a set of natural language rules, a computer program, a machine, or other procedural invention, which is set into motion with some degree of autonomy contributing to or resulting in a completed work of art. Philip Galanter, “What is Generative Art?”, 2003 The generative artist is working at one remove: the artist composes the system, and the system generates the work. Generative art has a long history. Wind chimes and aeolian harps (wind harps), both known in ancient times, have been claimed for generative art. A more substantial body of art is the extraordinary geometric art made in the Islamic world, particularly in religious contexts. The best-known example is the Alhambra in Spain (13th-14th century). Much of the geometric work is based on 6-, 8- or 10-sided figures arranged in a systematic manner. A more contemporary example of geometric generative art is Sol LeWitt's wall drawings (1968 on), carried out according to simple written instructions. With the spread of computers generative art expanded enormously in scope. The earliest computer art was necessarily generative, as there were no tools like Photoshop; getting anything out of a computer required writing a program.
  • Phd in Computational Media, Arts & Cultures

    Phd in Computational Media, Arts & Cultures

    Computational Media, Arts & Cultures PhD Proposal 19 April 2016/vs 1 PROPOSAL for an Interdisciplinary, Interdepartmental PhD in Computational Media, Arts & Cultures Submitted by: Victoria Szabo, Art History & Visual Studies and Information Science + Studies Mark Hansen, Program in Literature and Art, Art History & Visual Studies Deborah Jenson, Franklin Humanities Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 4 II. RATIONALE FOR THE PROGRAM .................................................................................................................. 5 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 B. History and Background ............................................................................................................ 6 C. An Interdisciplinary, Interdepartmental Program ......................................................... 11 D. The Interdisciplinary Humanities Lab Model .................................................................. 13 E. Characteristics of the Constituting Partners ..................................................................... 15 F. Rationale for a Distinct Program .......................................................................................... 16 G. Unit Sponsor Contributions ...................................................................................................
  • Artist-Programmers and Programming Languages for the Arts

    Artist-Programmers and Programming Languages for the Arts

    Artist-Programmers and Programming Languages for the Arts Christopher Alex McLean esis submied to Goldsmiths, University of London, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. October 2011 Dedicated to Jess, Harvey, Mum, Dad, Andrea and Stuart and the rest of my family, to whom I owe everything, and with the memory of those who supported this work but passed away before seeing its end, namely my Father-in-Law Dr. David Elmore, and my cat Olga. 2 Abstract We consider the artist-programmer, who creates work through its description as source code. e artist-programmer grandstands computer language, giving unique vantage over human- computer interaction in a creative context. We focus on the human in this relationship, noting that humans use an amalgam of language and gesture to express themselves. Accordingly we expose the deep relationship between computer languages and continuous expression, exam- ining how these realms may support one another, and how the artist-programmer may fully engage with both. Our argument takes us up through layers of representation, starting with symbols, then words, language and notation, to consider the role that these representations may play in hu- man creativity. We form a cross-disciplinary perspective from psychology, computer science, linguistics, human-computer interaction, computational creativity, music technology and the arts. We develop and demonstrate the potential of this view to inform arts practice, through the practical introduction of soware prototypes, artworks, programming languages and im- provised performances. In particular, we introduce works which demonstrate the role of per- ception in symbolic semantics, embed the representation of time in programming language, include visuospatial arrangement in syntax, and embed the activity of programming in the improvisation and experience of art.
  • Download the GA2014 E-Book for Free

    Download the GA2014 E-Book for Free

    XVII Generative Art Conference - GA2014 ,QWKHVWDQGWKFRYHUDQDQDPRUSKLFSHUVSHFWLYHIURPLQVLGHDEDURTXHFDWKHGUDO DQGDVHTXHQFHRIELUGVDOOJHQHUDWHGE\&HOHVWLQR6RGGX 7KH'9'LPDJHVRIJHQHUDWHGELUGVDUHXQLTXHDOOGLIIHUHQWDQGGHGLFDWHGWRHDFK SDUWLFLSDQWWR*$ 3ULQWHGLQ0LODQWKH1RYHPEHU 'RPXV$UJHQLD3XEOLVKHU ,6%1 page # 1 XVII Generative Art Conference - GA2014 *(1(5$7,9($57 *$;9,,,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFH 5RPHDQG'HFHPEHU &RQIHUHQFHDW7HPSLRGL$GULDQR ([KLELWLRQDWWKH*DOOHU\RI$QJHOLFD/LEUDU\ /LYH3HUIRUPDQFHVDW&HUYDQWHV*DOOHU\ 3URFHHGLQJV (GLWHGE\&HOHVWLQR6RGGXDQG(QULFD&RODEHOOD *HQHUDWLYH'HVLJQ/DE 3ROLWHFQLFRGL0LODQR8QLYHUVLW\,WDO\ page # 2 XVII Generative Art Conference - GA2014 INDEX page # 7 *HQHUDWLYH$UW&ORXG ,QWURGXFWLRQE\&HOHVWLQR6RGGXDQG(QULFD&RODEHOOD 3DSHUV page # 10 &HOHVWLQR6RGGX ,WDO\*HQHUDWLYH'HVLJQ/DE3ROLWHFQLFRGL0LODQR8QLYHUVLW\ *HQHUDWLYH$UW*HRPHWU\/RJLFDO,QWHUSUHWDWLRQVIRU*HQHUDWLYH$OJRULWKPV page # 24 $ELU$FKDUMHH 8.8QLYHUVLW\&ROOHJH/RQGRQ )RUP*HQHUDWLRQDQG2SWLPLVHG3DQHOLQJIRU7KH2YDO page # 34 $OHMDQGUR/RSH]5LQFRQ )UDQFH&156 $UWLILFLDO'UDZLQJ page # 47 $QGUHD:ROOHQVDN%ULGJHW%DLUG 86$&RQQHFWLFXW&ROOHJH'HSDUWPHQWRI$UW 3K U DVH7UDQVLWLRQ$*HQHUDWLYHO\&RQVWUXFWHG,QWHUDFWLYH9LVXDODQG3RHWLF(QYLURQPHQW page # 57 %HQ%DUXFK%OLFK ,VUDHO+LVWRU\DQG7KHRU\GHSW%H]DOHO$FDGHP\RI$UWVDQG'HVLJQ 7ZLVWHGERGLHVDQQLKLODWLQJWKHDHVWKHWLF page # 79 %LQ8PLQR$VDNR6RJD -DSDQ7R\R8QLYHUVLW\5\XNRNX8QLYHUVLW\ $XWRPDWLF&RPSRVLWLRQ6RIWZDUHIRU7KUHH*HQUHVRI'DQFH8VLQJ'0RWLRQ'DWD page # 92 'DQLHO%LVLJ3DEOR3DODFLR 6ZLW]HUODQG6SDLQ=XULFK8QLYHUVLW\RIWKH$UWV