The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) T Constructed Sixteen State Parks Totalling 34,673 Acres in South Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) T Constructed Sixteen State Parks Totalling 34,673 Acres in South Carolina South Carolina Department of Archives and History Document Packet Number 4 THE CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS IN SOUTH CAROLINA 1933–1942 South Carolina Department of Archives and History Document Packet Number 4 ©1997 South Carolina Department of Archives and History Produced by:The Education Service Area, Alexia J. Helsley, director; and the Publications Service Area, Judith M. Andrews, director. Credits: Folder drawings by Marshall Davis for the Camp Life Series, 1939–1940; Records of the Office of Education; Record Group 12; National Archives,Washington, DC Photographs of scenes from camp life courtesy South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism, Columbia, SC Aerial photograph of Cheraw State Park: Can 20542, OY 4B 17; Records of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service; Records of the Department of Agriculture; Record Group 145; National Archives, Washington, DC Folder cover of CCC work on Hunting Island from Forestry Commission Administration Photographs from CCC files c1934–1942, SCDAH South Carolina Department of Archives and History Document Packet Number 4 Table of contents 7. Document 3: 13. Document 10: First enrolment form Pictograph report 1. Introductory folder Student activities Student activities 2. BSAP Objectives 8. Document 4: 14. Document 11: 3. Bibliography/Teacher resource Day telegram to state foresters Letter 4. Vocabulary Student activities Student activities 5. Document analysis worksheet 9. Document 5: 15. Document 12: Affidavit of property transfer Certificate 6. Photograph analysis worksheet Student activities Student activities 5. Document 1: 10. Document 6: 16. Document 13: FDR’s sketch of CCC Appproval of Project SP-1 1940 Census map Transcription Student activities Student activities Student activities 11. Document 7: 17. Document 14: 6. Document 2: Letter from cmdr at Ft. Moultrie Map of CCC camps Executive Order Student activities Student activities Student activities 12. Documents 8 and 9: 18. Essay and photos of Memo re roads and map CCC camps Student activities S.C. DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES & HISTORY DOCUMENT PACKET 4 THE CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS IN SOUTH CAROLINA 1933–1942 He noted the problems and employment opportunities that lay within the public domain and urged the creation of a workforce to rescue the land, revitalize the nation’s economy, and improve social conditions. Congress acted quickly. Ten days later, Roosevelt signed a bill that embodied his ideas and created a Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC). The new law gave Roosevelt blanket authority to put his plan into effect. Section 1 of the law stated its pur- pose. Congress had passed it to relieve unemployment, provide for the restora- tion of the nation’s depleted resources, and advance an orderly program of large- Background scale public works. It authorized the October 1929—the stock market crashed On July 2, 1932 when Franklin D. president “under such rules and regula- and prosperous America was suddenly Roosevelt accepted the Democratic tions as he may prescribe,” to enroll the bankrupt. The market collapse instantly party's nomination for president, he jobless in the program, regardless of race, checked the uncontrolled use of borrowed revealed a plan for a great public works color, or creed. The enrollees would money that had fueled the free spending project that would relieve distress and reforest national and state lands to of the “Roaring 20s,” plunged the nation reclaim the ravaged land. The land prevent floods and erosion; control plant into a period of economic hardship, and project, said Roosevelt, would employ pests and deepened the plight of South Carolinians, “a million men.”1 disease; construct paths, trails, and fire who had been coping with an agricultural Once elected, Roosevelt moved lanes in national forests and parks; and depression that had begun in the early quickly. On March 9, 1933, only five carry out any other desirable programs. 1920s with a drop in cotton prices days after his inauguration as president, The law also permitted the president to followed by the boll weevil's destruction he called a meeting of six high provide the men with clothing, housing, of cotton crops. For the next decade, government officials: the secretaries of medical care, hospitalization, and a cash unemployed, hungry, and frightened war, agriculture, and interior, the director allowance. Americans suffered through the “Great of the Bureau of the Budget, the solicitor While Congress acted on the bill, the Depression.” from the Justice Department, and the president sketched an organizational plan The depression peaked in the winter judge advocate general of the Army. that used existing federal agencies to of 1932. Businesses had failed, When they gathered, he set before them avoid the introduction of a new, employment vanished, and millions of his plans for a civilian conservation cumbersome, and expensive administra- Americans, condemned to idleness, corps—a large-scale reclamation scheme tive system (Document I). An Executive struggled with poverty. The majority to recover the nation’s natural resources Order put the CCC into operation on were young men. They stood idly on and rescue America's young men. April 5, 1933 (Document II). It appointed street corners or stalked the countryside The president planned to transport Robert Fechner as director of Emergency searching for jobs no longer there. By half a million unemployed young men Conservation Work; authorized him to June, they numbered over one million. from city, town, and countryside into coordinate the efforts of an Advisory To complicate matters, the nation damaged resource areas—forests, farms, Council made up of representatives from faced a formidable problem of and streams—where they would live in the departments of war, agriculture, conservation. Shortsighted felling had outdoor camps and restore their interior, and labor; supplied funds; and reduced America’s virgin timberlands surroundings. Assured by the secretary planned logistics. By using the services of from 820 to 132 million acres; had of war that the camps could be made old-line departments, this new and unique downgraded once fertile areas to five- operational quickly and by the secretaries hundred million acres of scrubby second of interior and agriculture that projects growth, farm woodlots, and submarginal would be ready for the recruits, the farm land; and had lost fully one-quarter president ordered the judge advocate of the second growth to erosion. The general, the solicitor, and the budget lack of ground cover coupled with a director to legalize his plan. drought turned much of the nation’s On March 21, 1933, Congress richest areas into a “Dust Bowl.” listened to a message from the president. system of governmental administration state agencies promoted efficiency and assured sound management. benefitted the entire nation. Although Two weeks after Congress passed agreements between the state and the bill into law, the Advisory Council federal governments varied from place completed its plan of action. Federal to place, the CCC worked on any lands and state agencies would pool that needed conservation (Document resources and work together under the IV). In South Carolina, this teamwork direction of Fechner and his small staff; gave rise to project SP-1 (State Park 1). the Department of Labor would work The government had organized CCC with state welfare and relief officers to camps in South Carolina by May of select enrollees; Interior and Agricul- 1933, and the state made plans to ture would select camp sites, work designate and acquire land on which projects, and technical supervisors; the men would work. Citizens from fertile soil, employed 49,000 young War—specifically the U.S. Army, who Chesterfield County purchased 700 men, and injected more than fifty-seven alone had the capability—would acres of land and donated it to the state million dollars into the state’s economy construct and supply the camps, for recreation (Document V). The through wages and the purchase of land, mobilize and transport enrollees, South Carolina Commission of supplies, equipment, and services oversee their welfare, and provide Forestry administered the property, and (Document X). Nationwide, it stopped medical care. With their assignments in when the National Park Service the destruction of natural resources and hand, field offices of the various acquired 5,000 adjoining acres through created a national network of parks, departments and hundreds of state federal and state cooperation, the entire forests, and wildlife refuges. And it did conservation organizations quickly area became the nucleus of the conser- more. The leaders of the CCC knew that began the massive task of implementing vation-recreation program that created young men beaten down by the depres- Roosevelt’s grand plan. By April 17, SP-1 (Cheraw State Park). sion needed mental and physical enrollees were on their way to the CCC Company 445, which began rehabilitation to prepare them for work camps, where they would be introduced work near Conway and Charleston, in the field. To this end, they placed to a routine similar to army basic training. moved to Chesterfield County in unemployed teachers in each camp to The first enrollees were generally March 1934 when plans for SP-1 were conduct on-the-job vocational, aca- between the ages of 17 and 24, approved (Documents VI and VII), demic, and administrative training unemployed, and dependent upon commenced work on Cheraw State programs. As a result, hundreds of welfare. The government limited Park in June. Four years later, thousands of young men, when they left enrollment to six months and prohibited Company 445 had completed a 1,200 the camps, used the skills they had reenrollment to give everyone a chance to foot earthen dam to form 300-acre learned to enter new trades (Documents participate. Soon, however, it lifted this Juniper Lake and had built a commu- XI, XII). restriction and encouraged twelve-month nity hall, a kitchen, a dining hall, In the 1940s as the country prepared enrollments.
Recommended publications
  • Unali'yi Lodge
    Unali’Yi Lodge 236 Table of Contents Letter for Our Lodge Chief ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Letter from the Editor ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Local Parks and Camping ...................................................................................................................................... 9 James Island County Park ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Palmetto Island County Park ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Wannamaker County Park ............................................................................................................................................. 13 South Carolina State Parks ................................................................................................................................. 14 Aiken State Park ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Andrew Jackson State Park ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Winter/Spring 2013-2014
    FRESPACE Findings Winter/Spring 2013/2014 President’s Report water is a significant shock to our animals and is a hindrance to our equipment cleaning efforts 2013 has certainly been a year of change for us: during maintenance. Susan Spell, our long serving ParkWinter 2008 Allocated $78 for FRESPACE to become Manager, left us early in the year to be near an ill a non-profit member of the Edisto Chamber of family member. This had consumed much of her Commerce. The Board feels that the expense is time over the previous year or so. We will miss justified based on the additional publicity EBSP her. and FRESPACE will receive from the Chamber’s Our new Park Manager, Jon Greider, many advertising initiatives. joined us during the summer. He has been most The ELC water cooler no longer works. helpful to us and we look forward to working The failure occurred during the recent hard with him. freeze. When the required repair is identified Our Asst. Park Manager, Jimmy “Coach” FRESPACE is prepared to help defray the costs. Thompson, retired late in Dec. He has always Authorized up to $150 to install pickets been there to help us and we are going to miss around the ELC rain barrels. Currently the “Coach”. barrels are unsightly and in a very visible area. Our new Asst. Park Manager, Brandon Goff, assumed his new duties shortly after the Our Blowhard team recently was in need of first of 2014. additional volunteers. Ida Tipton sent out an email Dan McNamee, our Interpretive Ranger blast from Bill Andrews, our Blowhard Team lead, over the last several years, left us in the early fall describing our needs as well as describing what to go to work at the Low Country Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH CAROLINA Our Land, Our Water, Our Heritage
    SOUTH CAROLINA Our Land, Our Water, Our Heritage LWCF Funded Places in LWCF Success in South Carolina South Carolina The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) has provided funding to Federal Program help protect some of South Carolina’s most special places and ensure ACE Basin NWR recreational access for hunting, fishing and other outdoor activities. Cape Romain NWR South Carolina has received approximately $295 million in LWCF *Chattooga WSR funding over the past five decades, protecting places such as Fort Congaree NP Sumter National Monument, Cape Romain, Waccamaw and Ace Basin Cowpens NB National Wildlife Refuges, Congaree National Park, and Francis Marion Fort Sumter NM National Forest as well as sites protected under the Civil War Battlefield Francis Marion NF Preservation Program *Longleaf Pine Initiative Ninety Six NHS Sumter-Francis Marion NF Forest Legacy Program (FLP) grants are also funded under LWCF, to Sumter NF help protect working forests. The FLP cost-share funding supports Waccamaw NWR timber sector jobs and sustainable forest operations while enhancing wildlife habitat, water quality and recreation. For example, the FLP Federal Total $ 192,800,000 contributed to places such as the Catawba-Wateree Forest in Chester County and the Savannah River Corridor in Hampton County. The FLP Forest Legacy Program assists states and private forest owners to maintain working forest lands $ 39,400,000 through matching grants for permanent conservation easement and fee acquisitions, and has leveraged approximately $39 million in federal Habitat Conservation (Sec. 6) funds to invest in South Carolina’s forests, while protecting air and $ 1,700,000 water quality, wildlife habitat, access for recreation and other public American Battlefield Protection benefits provided by forests.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Forestry Commission
    South Carolina Forestry Commission Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Annual Report South Carolina Forestry Commission Annual Report FY 2011-2012 The South Carolina Forestry Commission prohibits discrimination in all programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. The Forestry Commission is an equal opportunity provider and employer. To file a complaint of discrimination, contact the Human Resources Director, SC Forestry Commission, P.O. Box 21707, Columbia, SC 29221, or call (803) 896-8800. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREST PROTECTION 5 Fire Management 5 Forest Health 14 Equipment 16 Law Enforcement 17 FOREST MANAGEMENT 18 Forest Management Assistance 18 Forest Services 22 Forest Stewardship 23 Community Forestry 23 State Forests and other state lands 26 Harbison State Forest 26 Niederhof 27 Poe Creek 29 Manchester State Forest 31 Wee Tee State Forest 33 Sand Hills State Forest 34 State Lands Overview 38 Education 40 RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 44 Business Development 44 Forest Inventory Analysis 45 Nursery and Tree Improvement 46 Environmental Management 52 TECHNOLOGY 53 Information Technology 53 GIS 53 Communications 54 Dispatch Operations 55 ADMINISTRATION 58 SCFC Financial Statement FY 2008-2009 58 Organizational Chart 59 2 STATE COMMISSION OF FORESTRY Members of the Commission Frank A. McLeod III, Columbia, Chair Mitchell S. Scott, Allendale, Vice Chair Dr. Benton H. Box, Clemson G. Edward Muckenfuss, Summerville H. Stro Morrison III, Estill Dr. A.G. “Skeet” Burris, Varnville James F. Barker, President, Clemson University Sam Coker, Gilbert James B. Thompson, Greenwood Administration Henry E. (Gene) Kodama, State Forester Joel T.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Zone Region / Overview
    SECTION 9 COASTAL ZONE REGION / OVERVIEW Index Map to Study Sites 2A Table Rock (Mountains) 5B Santee Cooper Project (Engineering & Canals) 2B Lake Jocassee Region (Energy Production) 6A Congaree Swamp (Pristine Forest) 3A Forty Acre Rock (Granite Outcropping) 7A Lake Marion (Limestone Outcropping) 3B Silverstreet (Agriculture) 8A Woods Bay (Preserved Carolina Bay) 3C Kings Mountain (Historical Battleground) 9A Charleston (Historic Port) 4A Columbia (Metropolitan Area) 9B Myrtle Beach (Tourist Area) 4B Graniteville (Mining Area) 9C The ACE Basin (Wildlife & Sea Island Culture) 4C Sugarloaf Mountain (Wildlife Refuge) 10A Winyah Bay (Rice Culture) 5A Savannah River Site (Habitat Restoration) 10B North Inlet (Hurricanes) TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR SECTION 9 COASTAL ZONE REGION / OVERVIEW - Index Map to Coastal Zone Overview Study Sites - Table of Contents for Section 9 - Power Thinking Activity - "Turtle Trot" - Performance Objectives - Background Information - Description of Landforms, Drainage Patterns, and Geologic Processes p. 9-2 . - Characteristic Landforms of the Coastal Zone p. 9-2 . - Geographic Features of Special Interest p. 9-3 . - Carolina Grand Strand p. 9-3 . - Santee Delta p. 9-4 . - Sea Islands - Influence of Topography on Historical Events and Cultural Trends p. 9-5 . - Coastal Zone Attracts Settlers p. 9-5 . - Native American Coastal Cultures p. 9-5 . - Early Spanish Settlements p. 9-5 . - Establishment of Santa Elena p. 9-6 . - Charles Towne: First British Settlement p. 9-6 . - Eliza Lucas Pinckney Introduces Indigo p. 9-7 . - figure 9-1 - "Map of Colonial Agriculture" p. 9-8 . - Pirates: A Coastal Zone Legacy p. 9-9 . - Charleston Under Siege During the Civil War p. 9-9 . - The Battle of Port Royal Sound p.
    [Show full text]
  • Edisto Beach Local Comprehensive Beach Management Plan 2017
    TOWN OF EDISTO BEACH LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE BEACH MANAGEMENT PLAN 2017 Previous State Approved-February 1, 2012 Beachfront Management Committee Adoption-April 12, 2017 Local Adoption -October 12, 2017 State Approved- April 2, 2019 Prepared by Iris Hill Page 1 of 129 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 History of Plan Approvals and Revisions ............................................................................................. 6 1.3. Overview of Municipality ................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Local Beach Management Policies ............................................................................................... 8 1.4 Local Beach Management Issues ........................................................................................................ 9 2. Inventory of Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................... 10 2.1 General Characteristics of the Beach ................................................................................................ 10 2.1.1 Land Use Patterns .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 South Carolina Aquatic Plant Management Plan
    2012 SOUTH CAROLINA AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by the Aquatic Nuisance Species Program South Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Approved by the South Carolina Aquatic Plant Management Council 2012 2012 SOUTH CAROLINA AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL Chris Page - Council Chairman S.C. Department of Natural Resources, Land, Water, and Conservation Division Jeannie Eidson - S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control, Environmental Quality Control, Bureau of Water Bob Perry - S.C. Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Division Marc L. Cribb - S.C. Department of Natural Resources, Land, Water, and Conservation Division David L. Tompkins - S.C. Department of Agriculture Jeff Thompson - S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control, Environmental Quality Control, Office of Coastal Resource Management John Inabinet - S.C. Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper) Stan Hutto - S.C. Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Tammy Lognion - Clemson University, Department of Pesticide Regulation Appointment Pending- Governor’s Office i SOUTH CAROLINA AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents PART I - PROCEDURAL MANAGEMENT PLAN --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Surface Water Resources -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: an Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 012 SE 046 389 AUTHOR Paige, John C. TITLE The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: An Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NPS-D-189 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 293p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Conservation (Environment); Employment Programs; *Environmental Education; *Federal Programs; Forestry; Natural Resources; Parks; *Physical Environment; *Resident Camp Programs; Soil Conservation IDENTIFIERS *Civilian Conservation Corps; Environmental Management; *National Park Service ABSTRACT The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) has been credited as one of Franklin D. Roosevelt's most successful effortsto conserve both the natural and human resources of the nation. This publication provides a review of the program and its impacton resource conservation, environmental management, and education. Chapters give accounts of: (1) the history of the CCC (tracing its origins, establishment, and termination); (2) the National Park Service role (explaining national and state parkprograms and co-operative planning elements); (3) National Park Servicecamps (describing programs and personnel training and education); (4) contributions of the CCC (identifying the major benefits ofthe program in the areas of resource conservation, park and recreational development, and natural and archaeological history finds); and (5) overall
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation Plan
    SCORP 2014 South Carolina State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan i SOUTH CAROLINA STATE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP) 2014 Nikki R. Haley Governor of South Carolina Duane Parrish Director, South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Phil Gaines Director, State Park Service State Liaison Officer South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism 1205 Pendleton Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 803-734-1658 www.discoversouthcarolina.com www.scprt.com The preparation of this report was financed by the South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks go to the following: Charleston County Park and Recreation Commission James Island County Park, the Lexington County Recreation and Aging Commission Cayce Tennis and Fitness Center, and Greenville County Recreation for the use of meeting facilities for the regional public hearings. Numerous public hearing participants and representatives of the more than 50 agencies and organizations that actively participated in the SCORP planning process, provided current information and data, submitted recommendations and contributed valuable comments and insight for the draft document. The Institute for Public Service and Policy Research, University of South Carolina, for their work on the 2014 South Carolina Outdoor Recreation Plan. Amy Blinson, Alternate State Liaison Officer, S.C. Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism, for her work on the 2014 South Carolina Outdoor Recreation Plan. Perry Baker, Interactive Manager/DiscoverSouthCarolina.com, for valuable assistance with the photos provided for the 2014 South Carolina Outdoor Recreation Plan. The main cover photo of this publication is Hunting Island State Park and the back cover is Table Rock State Park.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Multiple Property Documentation Form REGISTER
    NFS Form 10-900-b . 0MB Wo. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service ,.*v Q21989^ National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Multiple Property Documentation Form REGISTER This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing________________________________________ Historic Resources of South Carolina State Parks________________________ B. Associated Historic Contexts_____________________________________________ The Establishment and Development of South Carolina State Parks__________ C. Geographical Data The State of South Carolina [_JSee continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. Signature of gertifying official Date/ / Mary W. Ednonds, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer, SC Dept. of Archives & His tory State or Federal agency and bureau I, heceby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for ewalua|ing selaled properties for listing in the National Register. Signature of the Keeper of the National Register Date E.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas State Vita, PPS 8.10 Form 1A
    Texas State Vita, PPS 8.10 Form 1A Curriculum Vitae for Dr. Kimberly M. Meitzen I. ACADEMIC/PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND A. Name: Title: Kimberly M. Meitzen Assistant Professor Department of Geography [email protected] Texas State University San Marcos, TX 78666-4616 B. Educational Background Degree Year University Major Ph.D. 2011 University of South Carolina Geography Dissertation: “Flood Processes, Forest Dynamics, and Disturbance in the Congaree River Floodplain, South Carolina” M.S. 2006 University of South Carolina Geography Thesis: “Development, Disturbance, and Maintenance: Process-Pattern Relationships in Riparian Environments, Congaree River, Congaree National Park, South Carolina” B.A. 2003 University of Texas at Austin Geography Undergraduate Honors Thesis: “Spatial and Textural Variability in Overbank Deposits in Response to a Large Flood Event, Lower Guadalupe River, Texas” C. University Experience Position University Dates Assistant Professor Texas State University Aug. 2013 – present Post-Doctoral Research Associate Duke University Jan. 2012 – Jul. 2103 Environmental Flows Fellow for The Nature Conservancy North Carolina Chapter Research Assistant: University of South Carolina Sept. 2010 – Dec. 2011 South Carolina Applied Landscape Ecology Lab Instructor: University of South Carolina Jan. 2010 – May 2010 Intro. Physical Geography Instructor: University of South Carolina Sept. 2009 – Dec. 2009 Intro. Physical Geography Instructor: University of South Carolina Jan. 2009 – May 2009 Intro. Physical Geography Dr. Kimberly M. Meitzen, Texas State Vita, PPS 8.10 Form 1A Instructor: University of South Carolina Sept. 2008 – Dec. 2008 Intro. Physical Geography Research Assistant: University of South Carolina Sept. 2007 – Aug. 2008 River Research Group Research Assistant: University of South Carolina Jan. 2007 – Sept. 2007 South Carolina Applied Landscape Ecology Lab Lab Instructor: University of South Carolina Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 303(D) List Due to Standard Attainment, Identified Pollutant Or Listing Error
    The State of South Carolina’s 2010 Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters INTRODUCTION The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (Department) developed this priority list of waterbodies pursuant to Section §303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and Federal Regulation 40 CFR 130.7 last revised in 1992. The listing identifies South Carolina waterbodies that do not currently meet State water quality standards after application of required controls for point and nonpoint source pollutants. Use attainment determinations were made using water quality data collected from 2004-2008. Pollution severity and the classified uses of waterbodies were considered in establishing priorities and targets. The list will be used to target waterbodies for further investigation, additional monitoring, and water quality improvement measures, including Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Over the past three decades, impacts from point sources to waterbodies have been substantially reduced through point source controls achieved via National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Since 1990, steady progress in controlling nonpoint source impacts has also been made through implementation of South Carolina’s Nonpoint Source Management Program. In conjunction with TMDL development and implementation, the continued expansion and promotion of these and other state and local water quality improvement programs are expected to be effective in reducing the number of impaired waterbodies. In compliance with 40 CFR 25.4(c), the Department, beginning February 8, 2010, issued a public notice in statewide newspapers, to ensure broad notice of the Department's intent to update its list of impaired waterbodies. Public input was solicited.
    [Show full text]