DOCSLIB.ORG

BHP Billiton: Dirty Energy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BHP Billiton: Dirty Energy dirty energy Alternative Annual Report 2011 Contents Introduction 1 BHP Global mining operations – dirty energy investments 3 Coal BHP Billiton in Colombia: Destroying communities for coal 4 BHP Billiton in Indonesia: Going for Deadly Coal in Indonesia 7 BHP Billiton in Australia: When too much in!uence is never enough 8 BHP Billiton Australia: Coal mine workers "ght back - Queensland 10 BHP Billiton Australia: BHP battle with farmers - New South Wales 10 Oil and Gas and Greenhouse Gases BHP Billiton globally: Re-carbonising instead of decarbonising 11 BHP Billiton in Australia: Hero or destroyer? 12 Uranium BHP Billiton in Australia: “Wanti” uranium – leave it 13 BHP Billiton in Australia: Irradiating the future 15 BHP Billiton in Indonesia: Mining for REDD a false solution to climate change 18 Solutions? Less mining, more reuse and recycling? 19 Moving into rare earths? 20 Footnotes 22 Introduction “More than 30 million people were displaced in 2010 by environmental and weather-related disasters across Asia, experts have warned, and the problem is only likely to grow worse as cli- mate change exacerbates such problems. Tens of millions more people are likely to be similarly displaced in the future by the effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, floods, droughts and reduced agricultural productivity. Such people are likely to migrate in regions across Asia, and governments must start to prepare for the problems this will create.” – Asian Development Bank Report1 %+3 %LOOLWRQ LV WKH ZRUOG¶V ODUJHVW GLYHUVL¿HG QDWXUDO SROLF\ GHYHORSPHQW¶ WR HQFRXUDJH JRYHUQPHQWV WR DGRSW UHVRXUFHVFRPSDQ\ZLWKDPDUNHWFDSLWDOLVDWLRQRI86 PDUNHWEDVHGVROXWLRQVZKLFKZLOOKDYHDµUHYHQXHQHXWUDO¶ ELOOLRQDWWKHHQGRI-XQH,WSURGXFHVDOXPLQLXPFRDO LPSDFWRQEXVLQHVVHVVXFKDV%+3%LOOLWRQ¶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¿WVIRU4 PLQLQJFRDODOVRUHOHDVHVODUJHTXDQWLWLHVRIPHWKDQHZKLFK FRQWULEXWHVHYHQPRUHSRZHUIXOO\WRWKHULVHLQDWPRVSKHULF 7KH HQRUPRXV VL]H RI WKH FRPSDQ\ DQG WKH GLYHUVLW\ RI WHPSHUDWXUHVZKLFKSURGXFHFOLPDWHFKDQJH LWV SURGXFWV DQG RSHUDWLQJ ORFDWLRQV PHDQ WKDW WKHUH DUH D KRVWRIFRQFHUQVDERXWWKHLPSDFWVRILWVRSHUDWLRQVRQWKH %+3%LOOLWRQDFFHSWVWKH BHP Billiton accepts FOLPDWHHFRV\VWHPVDQGFRPPXQLWLHV5 LPSRUWDQFH RI UHGXFLQJ FDUERQHPLVVLRQVEXWKDV the importance of 7KLVµ$OWHUQDWLYH5HSRUW¶IRUGRHVQRWDWWHPSWWRQRWH QR LPPHGLDWH LQWHQWLRQ RI reducing carbon DOO WKHVH FRQFHUQV ,W FRQFHQWUDWHV LQVWHDG RQ WKH QHJDWLYH UHGXFLQJ LWV SURGXFWLRQ LPSDFWV RI WKH FRPSDQ\¶V SURGXFWLRQ RI PLQHUDOV DQG RI WKH PDWHULDOV ZKLFK emissions but has no K\GURFDUERQVXVHGLQHQHUJ\SURGXFWLRQ±FRDOJDVRLODQG PDNH WKH JUHDWHVW immediate intention XUDQLXP±%+3%LOOLWRQ¶Vµ'LUW\(QHUJ\¶ FRQWULEXWLRQWRWKHP of reducing its :HPDNHQRDWWHPSWWRSUHVHQWDQH[KDXVWLYHVXUYH\RIWKH ,QVWHDGWKHFRPSDQ\SURSRVHV FRPSDQ\¶V HQHUJ\UHODWHG RSHUDWLRQV 7KH DUWLFOHV LQ WKLV WR LQFUHDVH LWV SURGXFWLRQ RI production of the UHSRUWSURYLGHVQDSVKRWVRIWKHQHJDWLYHLPSDFWVRIVRPHRI RWKHU PDWHULDOV ZKLFK PD\ materials which WKRVHDFWLYLWLHVDVH[DPSOHVRIZK\WKHFRPSDQ\QHHGVWR PDNH D OHVV GHVWUXFWLYH FKDQJHFRXUVH FRQWULEXWLRQ WR FOLPDWH make the greatest FKDQJH EXW ZKLFK SRVH contribution to 7KHFRPSDQ\¶VUHSRUWVVKRZWKDWLWLVDZDUHRIWKHVHLPSDFWV YHU\ JUDYH SUREOHPV RI DQG RI PDQ\ RI WKH FRQFHUQV WKDW WKH\ UDLVH :KDW LV LWV WKHLURZQ them. UHVSRQVH" )LUVWWKHUHLVQDWXUDOJDVSURGXFWLRQ:LWKWKHDFTXLVLWLRQ 7KH FRPSDQ\ IXOO\ DFFHSWV WKH VFLHQWL¿F FRQVHQVXV RQ RI &KHVDSHDNH (QHUJ\ &RUSRUDWLRQ¶V )D\HWWHYLOOH VKDOH 6 FOLPDWHFKDQJH DQGDGPLWVWKDWLWKDVµDVRFLDODQGHFRQRPLF DVVHWVDQG3HWURKDZN(QHUJ\%+3%LOOLWRQKDVDQHQRUPRXV UHVSRQVLELOLW\ WR FRQVWUXFWLYHO\ HQJDJH RQ FOLPDWH FKDQJH VWDNHLQ86VKDOHJDVZKLFKLWZLOOGHYHORSZLWKWKHKHOS 7 LVVXHV¶ ,WVD\VLWLVZRUNLQJVXFFHVVIXOO\RQUHGXFLQJWKH RIK\GUDXOLFIUDFWXULQJRUµIUDFNLQJ¶$VWKHµ2LO*DVDQG µFDUERQLQWHQVLW\¶RILWVRSHUDWLRQV WKHDPRXQWRIJUHHQKRXVH *UHHQKRXVH *DVHV¶ DUWLFOH LQ WKLV UHSRUW SRLQWV RXW µ7KH JDVHVJHQHUDWHGSHUXQLWRISURGXFWLRQ DQGLVµHQJDJLQJLQ LPPHGLDWH FRQFHUQV RI FRPPXQLWLHV LQ VKDOH JDV ¿HOGV 1 LQYROYH SROOXWLRQ RI ZDWHU DQG GLVSHUVDO RI H[SORVLYH JDVHV FRPPXQLWLHV FRPPXQLWLHV RI $IULFDQ GHVFHQW ZKR DUH $QRWKHU REMHFWLRQ WR IUDFNLQJ FRQFHUQV WKH ³WUHPRUV DQG VXSSRVHGWREHJXDUDQWHHGFROOHFWLYHULJKWVWRWKHLUODQGXQGHU TXDNHV´ ZKLFK KDYH DOUHDG\ OHG WKH $UNDQVDV 2LO DQG *DV WKH &RORPELDQ &RQVWLWXWLRQ RI DQG WKH ,QGLJHQRXV &RPPLVVLRQ $2*& WRSHUPDQHQWO\FORVHGRZQWZRRI%+3 :D\XX3HRSOH %LOOLWRQ¶VZDVWHÀXLGVGLVSRVDOZHOOVLQLWV)D\HWWHYLOHVWUXFWXUH DIWHUIRXUPRQWKVRILQYHVWLJDWLRQLQWR³DFOXVWHURIWUHPRUVDQG 0DQ\ RI WKH FRPPXQLWLHV LPSDFWHG E\ %+3 %LOOLWRQ¶V TXDNHV´ LQ FHQWUDO$UNDQVDV$QG WKHUH LV XQFHUWDLQW\ DERXW RSHUDWLRQV DURXQG WKH ZRUOG DUH ,QGLJHQRXV FRPPXQLWLHV WKHLPSDFWRIVKDOHJDVSURGXFWLRQRQJUHHQKRXVHHPLVVLRQV :KLOHWKHFRPSDQ\LVH[SOLFLWLQLWVDFFHSWDQFHRIWKH8QLWHG WRR µ(YHQ WKH 86 (QYLURQPHQWDO 3URWHFWLRQ$JHQF\ (3$ 1DWLRQV'HFODUDWLRQRQ+XPDQ5LJKWV LWUHIXVHVWRDFFHSW KDVFRPHRXWZLWKDUHSRUWWKDWVKDOHJDVHPLWVPXFKODUJHU WKH8QLWHG1DWLRQV'HFODUDWLRQRQWKH5LJKWVRI,QGLJHQRXV DPRXQWVRIPHWKDQHWKDQFRQYHQWLRQDOJDV¶ 3HRSOHV 81'5,3 7KDW 'HFODUDWLRQ H[SOLFLWO\ UHFRJQLVHV ,QGLJHQRXV 3HRSOHV¶ ULJKW WR FRQWURO WKHLU RZQ ODQG PDQ\ 7KHQ WKHUH LV XUDQLXP SURGXFWLRQ %+3 %LOOLWRQ DSSHDUV WR ,QGLJHQRXV 3HRSOHV KDYH DIWHU DOO EHHQ LQFRUSRUDWHG LQWR EHOLHYH WKDW LI LW LQFUHDVHV XUDQLXP SURGXFWLRQ LW FDQ FODLP QDWLRQ VWDWHV ZLWKRXW WKHLU FRQVHQW DQG 81'5,3 LV DQ WKDW LW LV KHOSLQJ WR FUHDWH D ORZ FDUERQ HFRQRP\ $V WKLV DWWHPSW WR UHVWRUH VRPH PHDVXUH RI VHOIGHWHUPLQDWLRQ 7KH UHSRUW¶VDUWLFOHRQ%+3%LOOLWRQ¶V2O\PSLF'DPPLQHPDNHV 'HFODUDWLRQ UHFRJQLVHV ,QGLJHQRXV 3HRSOHV¶ ULJKW WR µ)UHH FOHDU H[SDQVLRQ RI XUDQLXP SURGXFWLRQ ZLOO LQ IDFW JUHDWO\ 3ULRU,QIRUPHG&RQVHQW¶ )3,& RYHUGHYHORSPHQWVRQWKHLU LQFUHDVHWKHPLQH¶VJHQHUDWLRQRIJUHHQKRXVHJDVHVDQGDOVR ODQGDQGWKLVFOHDUO\LPSOLHVWKHULJKWWRUHIXVHSHUPLVVLRQIRU XVH HQRUPRXV TXDQWLWLHV RI ZDWHU LQ DQ DULG DUHD ± DQ LVVXH VXFKGHYHORSPHQWVWRJRDKHDG%+3%LOOLWRQLQFOXGHVDPRQJ RIZKLFKWKHFRPSDQ\LVDZDUHDQGDERXWZKLFKLWFODLPVWR WKH UHDVRQV IRU LWV FXUUHQW UHMHFWLRQ RI )3,& WKDW WKHUH LV µD EHFRQFHUQHG%XWLQDGGLWLRQWRWKLVWKHUHLVDV\HWQRVDIH VXJJHVWLRQWKDWLWFRXOGEHDSSOLHGDWHDFKVWDJHRIDUHVRXUFH PHWKRGIRUSHUPDQHQWO\VWRULQJUDGLRDFWLYHZDVWHV3URGXFWLRQ GHYHORSPHQW ZKLFK ZRXOG FUHDWH XQFHUWDLQW\ IRU ORQJWHUP RIUDGLRDFWLYHPDWHULDOVWKHUHIRUHFUHDWHVVHYHUHGDQJHUIRUDOO LQYHVWPHQWV¶DQGWKDWµ)3,&FRXOGSUHVHQWHWKLFDOFKDOOHQJHV IXWXUHJHQHUDWLRQVERWKIURPWKHUDGLRDFWLYHZDVWHVFUHDWHGE\ DVLWPD\DSSHDUWRFRQIHUDVSHFLDOVHWRIULJKWVRQDJURXS PLQLQJXUDQLXPDQGWKHKLJKOHYHOZDVWHVSURGXFHGWKURXJK RISHRSOHZKRKDYHEHHQERUQLQWRDSDUWLFXODUFODVV¶:KLOH WKH XVH RI XUDQLXP LQ HQHUJ\ JHQHUDWLRQ DQG ZHDSRQU\ SURFODLPLQJ LWV UHVSHFW IRU ,QGLJHQRXV 3HRSOHV¶ FXOWXUHV 7KH )XNXVKLPD GLVDVWHU HDUOLHU WKLV \HDU VKRZV WKDW QXFOHDU %+3 %LOOLWRQ LV RSSRVHG WR DOORZLQJ ,QGLJHQRXV 3HRSOHV WR HQHUJ\SURGXFWLRQFDQQRWEHJXDUDQWHHGWREHVDIHDQGWKDW DVVHUWFRQWURORYHUWKHLUWHUULWRULHVRUIRUWKHLUULJKWVWRWDNH WKHFRQVHTXHQFHVZKHQWKLQJVJRZURQJFDQEHFDWDVWURSKLF SUHFHGHQFHRYHUWKHFRPSDQ\¶VSUR¿WV 7KHUHDUHDOVRFRQFHUQVDERXWWKHFORVHOLQNVEHWZHHQµFLYLOLDQ¶ QXFOHDUHQHUJ\SURJUDPVDQGWKHSURGXFWLRQRIWKHPDWHULDOV %+3 %LOOLWRQ¶V SUR¿WV ± FRORVVDO DV WKH\ DUH ± DUH EHLQJ XVHGIRUQXFOHDUZHDSRQV PDGH DW WKH H[SHQVH RI ,QGLJHQRXV DQG RWKHU SHRSOHV WKH GHVWUXFWLRQ DQG GHJUDGDWLRQ RI KHDOWK\ HFRV\VWHPV DQG WKH $QRWKHUIDOVHVROXWLRQZKLFK%+3%LOOLWRQLVSXUVXLQJLQDQ GDQJHURXVDOWHUDWLRQRIWKHHDUWK¶VDWPRVSKHUH7KHEXVLQHVV HIIRUWWRPLWLJDWHWKHLPSDFWVRILWVRSHUDWLRQVRQWKHFOLPDWH DVXVXDOPRGHOLVQRWVXI¿FLHQWLIZHDUHWRWUXO\DGGUHVVWKH DQG ZKLFK ZH FRYHU EHORZ LV 5('' WKH 8QLWHG 1DWLRQV LPSDFWRI0XOWL1DWLRQDO(QWHUSULVHV 01(V RQ,QGLJHQRXV &ROODERUDWLYH 3URJUDPPH RQ 5HGXFLQJ (PLVVLRQV IURP FRPPXQLWLHVDQGRQRXUHQYLURQPHQW 'HIRUHVWDWLRQDQG)RUHVW'HJUDGDWLRQLQ'HYHORSLQJ&RXQWULHV 7KH FRPSDQ\ FRPPLWV WR SURWHFWLQJ DUHDV RI WURSLFDO IRUHVW 6LHPHQV D JOREDO HQJLQHHULQJ ¿UP KDV UHFHQWO\ DEDQGRQHG ZKLFK PD\ RU PD\ QRW EH XQGHU WKUHDW ZKLOH SXUVXLQJ FRDO SODQVWRUHHQWHUQXFOHDUSRZHUSURGXFWLRQDQGLQVWHDGZLOO PLQLQJSURMHFWVLQRWKHUDUHDVRIWURSLFDOIRUHVWFRQWULEXWLQJWR SXVKUHQHZDEOHHQHUJ\VRXUFHVVXFKDVZLQGWXUELQHVDQGVRODU FOLPDWHFKDQJHE\GHIRUHVWDWLRQIXJLWLYHPHWKDQHHPLVVLRQV SRZHU 7KLVFRXOGEHWKHWKLQHGJHRIWKHZHGJHIRU01(VWR DQG JUHHQKRXVH JDVHV JHQHUDWHG LQ WKH PLQLQJ SURFHVV DQG UHGLUHFWLQYHVWPHQWVWRZDUGVUHQHZDEOHHQHUJ\±DQLQGXVWU\ WKURXJKWKHEXUQLQJRIWKHFRDOSURGXFHG ZLWKFOHDUJURZWKWKDWFRQWULEXWHVWRRQJRLQJHQHUJ\VHFXULW\ DGGUHVVHV FDUERQ LQWHQVLYH HQHUJ\ SURGXFWLRQ DQG HQMR\V $V WKH DUWLFOHV EHORZ GHPRQVWUDWH LQ DGGLWLRQ WR FOLPDWH DZLGHUDQJHRIVXSSRUWIURPJRYHUQPHQWFLYLOVRFLHW\DQG FKDQJHLPSDFWVGHIRUHVWDWLRQUDGLRDFWLYHZDVWHSURGXFWLRQ EXVLQHVV LQWHQVH ZDWHU XVH DQG ZDWHU SROOXWLRQ %+3 %LOOLWRQ¶V PLQLQJ RSHUDWLRQV DUH DOVR DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK UHVHWWOHPHQW RI 7KH RUJDQLVDWLRQV WKDW KDYH SURGXFHG WKLV DOWHUQDWLYH UHSRUW FRPPXQLWLHV GHVWUXFWLRQ RI WUDGLWLRQDO OLYHOLKRRGV KXPDQ ZDQW %+3 %LOOLWRQ WR PRYH RXW RI GLUW\ HQHUJ\ ± EXW ZKDW ULJKWVDEXVHVDQGÀRXWLQJRI,QGLJHQRXV3HRSOHV¶ULJKWV ZRXOG ZH SXW LQ LWV SODFH" 7ZR FRQWULEXWRUV PDNH VRPH VXJJHVWLRQV:HGR QRW FODLP WR NQRZ D
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vacancies Increase for 5Th Straight Month
    MTHEAUSTLIAN R publication ININaustralianminingreview.com.auG EVIEa WPTY LTD PP100007123 ISSUE 107, JANUARY 2017 NEWS: TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION P10 AUSTRALIAN CONTRACTORS IN AFRICA P17 THE INTERVIEW: REBECCA KNOL P70 Mining jobs recovery Vacancies increase for 5th straight month ELIZABETH FABRI “THE WA SECTOR, IN a sign of the revival for the sector, WITH ITS employment opportunities for Australian BROADER MIX OF resources workers have risen by almost 20 per cent in the last six months. PRODUCTS, HAS DFP Mining and Resources’ latest job GOOD POTENTIAL index stated employment in the resources sector had improved by 1.5 per cent to FOR FURTHER 60.42 in November; this represented IMPROVEMENTS the industry’s fifth consecutive monthly vacancy rise. AFTER THE “Job opportunities have now risen a HOLIDAY SEASON.” significant 19.6 per cent in the last six months,” the report stated. “Permanent vacancy growth stood out again, rising 2.4 per cent to 57.43, while temporary and contract roles managed a small increase of 0.4 per cent. It found permanent job opportunities were up a healthy 14.5 per cent over the last three months, while demand for temporary and contract staff had risen 23.9 per cent in the last six months. “[This] demonstrates that mining and resource employers are showing confidence in this early stage of the recovery phase,” DFP stated. Of the commodities surveyed, the coal industry was the top performer for the month, rising 10.7 per cent, while metal (continued on page 6) ore mining saw its first decrease since April by 3.8 per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • BHP “Extreme” Consequence Tailings Dams with Potential to Cause Fatality of 100 Employees
    BHP “Extreme” consequence tailings dams with potential to cause fatality of 100 employees: Briefing Paper by David Noonan, Independent Environment Campaigner - 22 May 2020 BHP has Questions to answer on Worker Safety, Transparency and Accountability at Olympic Dam BHP took over Olympic Dam copper-uranium mine in 2005, operating the mine for a decade before a GHD “TSF Dam Break Safety Report”1 to BHP in August 2016 concluded all existing Tailings Storage Facilities (TSFs) are “Extreme” consequence tailings dams with a failure potential to cause the death of 100 BHP employees: “BHP OD has assessed the consequence category of the TSFs according to ANCOLD (2012a,b). A dam break study, which considered 16 breach scenarios of TSFs 1 to 5, was completed by GHD (2016) and indicated a potential for tailings and water flow into the mine’s backfill quarry and underground portal. The following conclusions were drawn: • The population at risk (PAR) for a TSF embankment breach is greater than 100 to less than 1000 mine personnel primarily as a result of the potential flow of tailings into the adjacent backfill quarry and entrance to the underground mine. • The financial cost to BHP OD for a tailings dam failure was assessed by BHP OD to be greater than US$1B, a “catastrophic” loss according to ANCOLD guidelines (2012a,b). Based on these criteria, the TSFs at Olympic Dam have been given a consequence category of “Extreme” to guide future assessments and designs. Note that this is an increase compared to the assessment prior to the FY16 Annual Safety Inspection and Review (Golder Associates, 2016a) which classified TSF 1-4 and TSF 5 as “High A” and “High B”, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fair Share for Australian Manufacturing: Manufacturing Renewal for the Post-COVID Economy
    A Fair Share for Australian Manufacturing: Manufacturing Renewal for the Post-COVID Economy By Dr. Jim Stanford The Centre for Future Work at the Australia Institute July 2020 A Fair Share for Australian Manufacturing 1 About The Australia Institute About the Centre for Future Work The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think The Centre for Future Work is a research centre, housed within tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from the Australia Institute, to conduct and publish progressive philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned economic research on work, employment, and labour markets. research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or It serves as a unique centre of excellence on the economic candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried issues facing working people: including the future of jobs, out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, wages and income distribution, skills and training, sector and social and environmental issues. industry policies, globalisation, the role of government, public services, and more. The Centre also develops timely and Our Philosophy practical policy proposals to help make the world of work As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our better for working people and their families. society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are www.futurework.org.au more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite About the Author heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently Jim Stanford is Economist and Director of the Centre for Future needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Closure Management and Rehabilitation Plan Olympic Dam
    CLOSURE MANAGEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN OLYMPIC DAM May 2019 Copyright BHP is the sole owner of the intellectual property contained in any documentation bearing its name. All materials including internet pages, documents and online graphics, audio and video, are protected by copyright law. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted in any form or re-used for any commercial purposes whatsoever without the prior written permission of BHP. This document represents the status of the topic at the date shown and is subject to change without notice. The latest version of this document is available from Document Control. © 2019 BHP. All rights reserved. This document is uncontrolled when printed. This Closure and Rehabilitation Plan has been prepared as information only and is not to be relied on as final or definitive. It would continue to be developed and would be subject to change. BHP Olympic Dam Closure Management and Rehabilitation Plan Closure Management Plan Summary Olympic Dam Mine Project Olympic Dam Document Title Olympic Dam Mine Closure Management and Rehabilitation Plan Document Reference 99232 Mining Tenements Special Mining Lease 1 Company Name BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd Electronic Approval Record Business Role Name Authors Role Name Principal Strategic Planning Don Grant Principal Environment A&I Murray Tyler Principal Closure Planning Craig Lockhart Reviewer Role Name Manager Closure Planning Rebecca Wright Superintendent Environment, Radiation and Occupational Hygiene James Owen Principal Legal Zoe Jones Approver Role Name Head of Environment Analysis and Improvement Gavin Price Head of Geoscience and Resource Engineering Amanda Weir Asset President Olympic Dam Laura Tyler Document Amendment Record Version.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Electricity Policy for Australia
    Renewable electricity policy for Australia Mark Diesendorf Associate Professor, School of Humanities & Languages UNSW Sydney Email: [email protected] November 2018 ABOUT THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. OUR PHILOSOPHY As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities. What unites us is a belief that through a combination of research and creativity we can promote new solutions and ways of thinking. OUR PURPOSE – ‘RESEARCH THAT MATTERS’ The Institute publishes research that contributes to a more just, sustainable and peaceful society. Our goal is to gather, interpret and communicate evidence in order to both diagnose the problems we face and propose new solutions to tackle them. The Institute is wholly independent and not affiliated with any other organisation. Donations to its Research Fund are tax deductible for the donor. Anyone wishing to donate can do so via the website at https://www.tai.org.au or by calling the Institute on 02 6130 0530.
    [Show full text]
  • Covering Letter
    Inquiry into Australia’s faunal extinction crisis A u n s o t i r t a a l ia d n un Koala Fo Covering Letter 2nd August 2018 Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications [email protected] The Inquiry into Australia’s faunal extinction crisis The Australian Koala Foundation is pleased to provide these comments to the Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications. Should you require further information our contact details are as follows: Deborah Tabart OAM, CEO of the Australian Koala Foundation Ph: (07) 3229 7233 Email: [email protected] GPO Box 2659, Brisbane QLD 4001 I would appreciate if the Committee could make the submission and my name public. Inquiry into Australia’s faunal extinction crisis - Page 1 of 13 A u n s o t i r t a a l ia d n un Koala Fo Inquiry into Australia’s faunal extinction crisis Submission by the Australian Koala Foundation (AKF) Submission summary On behalf of the Australian Koala Foundation (AKF), we thank the Senate En- vironment and Communications Committee for the opportunity to comment on Australia’s faunal extinction crisis. The Australian Koala Foundation participated in a former Senate Inquiry for the Koala in 2011. The AKF’s submission to the 2011 Inquiry is attached in Appendix A. The scientific bibliography should satisfy our credentials on this matter. The Senate Report of 2011 identified that the Koala was in crisis and the Com- mittee took 101 submissions and had 3 hearings, in Brisbane, Melbourne and Canberra. It is sobering reading and as I prepare this submission, it shocks me that nothing has changed, except the plight of the Koala is now worse.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 Report 46 March 2020 www.parliament.nsw.gov.au LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Standing Committee on State Development Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 Ordered to be printed 4 March 2020 according to Standing Order 231 Report 46 - March 2020 i LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on State Development. Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 / Standing Committee on State Development. [Sydney, N.S.W.] : the Committee, 2020. – [xiv, 150] pages ; 30 cm. (Report no. 46 / Standing Committee on State Development) Chair: Hon. Taylor Martin, MLC. “March 2020” ISBN 9781920788599 1. New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council—Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2018. 2. Uranium mines and mining—Law and legislation—New South Wales. 3. Nuclear industry—Law and legislation—New South Wales. 4. Nuclear energy—Law and legislation—New South Wales. I. Martin, Taylor. II. Title. III. Series: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on State Development. Report ; no. 46 622.349 (DDC22) ii Report 46 - March 2020 STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT Table of contents Terms of reference vi Committee details vii Chair’s foreword
    [Show full text]
  • Threatening Lives, the Environment and People's Future
    other sides to the story Threatening lives, the environment and people’s future An Alternative Annual Report 2010 FRONT COVER: Stockphoto.com INSIDE BACK COVER: BHP Billiton protest. Photo courtesy of the ACE Collective, Friends of the Earth Melbourne. BACK COVER: Mine tailings at the BHP Billiton’s Olympic Dam Mine in South Australia (2008). Photo: Jessie Boylan BELOW: Nickel laterite ore being loaded at Manuran Island, Philipines. The ore is then taken by barge to waiting ships. Credit: CT Case studies questioning BHP Billiton’s record on human rights, transparency and ecological justice CONTENTS Introduction 2 BHP Billiton Shadow Report: Shining a light on revenue flows 3 MOZAMBIQUE: The double standards of BHP Billiton 4 WESTERN SAHARA: Bou Craa phosphate mine 6 PHILIPPINES: BHP Billiton pulls out of Hallmark Nickel 7 CAMBODIA: How “tea-money” got BHP-Billiton into hot water 8 PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Ok Tedi – a legacy of destruction 9 BORNEO: Exploiting mining rights in the Heart of Borneo 11 BHP Billiton Around the World 12 COLOMBIA: Cerrejon Coal mine 14 SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Olympic Dam Mine 16 WESTERN AUSTRALIA: Yeelirrie ‘Wanti - Uranium leave it in the ground’ 18 WESTERN AUSTRALIA: Hero or destroyer 20 NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA: Farmers triumph 20 Conclusion 21 Footnotes 23 Credits 24 | 1 | BHP Billiton Alternative Annual Report 2010 This report examines a number of BHP Billiton’s activities must not take place. To date, BHP Billiton has operations around the world. The collection of merely noted that there are “a wide diversity of views” on case studies highlights the disparity between BHP FPIC, and fails to rise to the challenge needed to genuinely Billiton’s ‘Sustainability Framework’ and the reality implement it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australia Institute Is an Independent Public Policy Think Tank Based in Canberra
    The MRRT should not be abolished Submission October 2013 David Richardson Submission About TAI The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals, memberships and commissioned research. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. Our philosophy As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities. What unites us is a belief that through a combination of research and creativity we can promote new solutions and ways of thinking. Our purpose—‘Research that matters’ The Institute aims to foster informed debate about our culture, our economy and our environment and bring greater accountability to the democratic process. Our goal is to gather, interpret and communicate evidence in order to both diagnose the problems we face and propose new solutions to tackle them. The Institute is wholly independent and not affiliated with any other organisation. As an Approved Research Institute, donations to its Research Fund are tax deductible for the donor. Anyone wishing to donate can do so via the website at https://www.tai.org.au or by calling the Institute on 02 6206 8700.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Conservation Foundation
    SUBMISSION NO. 8 TT on 12 March 2013 Australian Conservation Foundation submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties on the Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United Arab Emirates on Co- operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy May 2013 Introduction: The Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) is committed to inspiring people to achieve a healthy environment for all Australians. For nearly fifty years, we have worked with the community, business and government to protect, restore and sustain our environment. ACF welcomes this opportunity to comment on the Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United Arab Emirates for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. ACF has a long and continuing interest and active engagement with the Australian uranium sector and contests the assumptions under-lying the proposed treaty. ACF would welcome the opportunity to address this submission before the Committee. Nuclear safeguards Uranium is the principal material required for nuclear weapons. Successive Australian governments have attempted to maintain a distinction between civil and military end uses of Australian uranium exports, however this distinction is more psychological than real. No amount of safeguards can absolutely guarantee Australian uranium is used solely for peaceful purposes. According the former US Vice-President Al Gore, “in the eight years I served in the White House, every weapons proliferation issue we faced was linked with a civilian reactor program.”1 Energy Agency, 1993 Despite successive federal government assurances that bilateral safeguard agreements ensure peaceful uses of Australian uranium in nuclear power reactors, the fact remains that by exporting uranium for use in nuclear power programs to nuclear weapons states, other uranium supplies are free to be used for nuclear weapons programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Dam Expansion
    OLYMPIC DAM EXPANSION DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 2009 APPENDIX P CULTURAL HERITAGE ISBN 978-0-9806218-0-8 (set) ISBN 978-0-9806218-4-6 (appendices) APPENDIX P CULTURAL HERITAGE APPENDIX P1 Aboriginal cultural heritage Table P1 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage reports held by BHP Billiton AUTHOR DATE TITLE Antakirinja Incorporated Undated – circa Report to Roxby Management Services by Antakirinja Incorporated on August 1985 Matters Related To Aboriginal Interests in The Project Area at Olympic Dam Anthropos Australis February 1996 The Report of an Aboriginal Ethnographic Field Survey of Proposed Works at Olympic Dam Operations, Roxby Downs, South Australia Anthropos Australis April 1996 The Report of an Aboriginal Archaeological Field Survey of Proposed Works at Olympic Dam Operations, Roxby Downs, South Australia Anthropos Australis May 1996 Final Preliminary Advice on an Archaeological Survey of Roxby Downs Town, Eastern and Southern Subdivision, for Olympic Dam Operations, Western Mining Corporation Limited, South Australia Archae-Aus Pty Ltd July 1996 The Report of an Archaeological Field Inspection of Proposed Works Areas within Olympic Dam Operations’ Mining Lease, Roxby Downs, South Australia Archae-Aus Pty Ltd October 1996 The Report of an Aboriginal Heritage Assessment of Proposed Works Areas at Olympic Dam Operations’ Mining Lease and Village Site, Roxby Downs, South Australia (Volumes 1-2) Archae-Aus Pty Ltd April 1997 A Report of the Detailed Re-Recording of Selected Archaeological Sites within the Olympic Dam Special
    [Show full text]
  • Public Submission to BHP's EPBC Act Referral 2019/8570 “Olympic Dam
    Public Submission to BHP’s EPBC Act Referral 2019/8570 “Olympic Dam Resource Development Strategy” copper-uranium mine expansion 9th December 2019 The proposed BHP “Olympic Dam Resource Development Strategy” (OD-RDS) copper-uranium mine expansion, and BHP’s proposed major new Tailings Storage Facility 6 (TSF 6) Referral 2019/8465 and associated Evaporation Pond 6 (EP 6) Referral 2019/8526, present significant environmental and public health implications. In particular, in relation to protection of Matters of National Environmental Significance (NES), to mine water consumption with impacts on the Great Artesian Basin and on the unique and fragile Mound Springs, and to radioactive risks and impacts. Uranium mining at BHP’s Olympic Dam mine is a controlled “nuclear action” and “Matter of National Environmental Significance” under the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act): “this means that it is necessary to consider impacts on the whole environment” (federal Department of Environment, Sept 2011, p.4). Our organisations, ACF, FoE Australia and Conservation SA, welcome this opportunity to comment and draw your attention to the following over-arching recommendations in relation to your consideration of BHP’s applications. • The Olympic Dam operation should be assessed in its entirety in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) level public assessment process under the EPBC Act, with the full range of project impacts subject to public consultation. • A comprehensive Safety Risk Assessment of all Olympic Dam mine tailings and tailings storage facilities is required as part of this EPBC Act EIS level public process. This is particularly important given the identification by BHP of three ‘extreme-risk’ status tailings facilities at Olympic Dam.
    [Show full text]