3-Dimensional Evolution of a Magnetic Flux Tube Emerging Into the Solar Atmosphere T. Magara

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3-Dimensional Evolution of a Magnetic Flux Tube Emerging Into the Solar Atmosphere T. Magara NATO Advanced Research Workshop 3-dimensional Evolution of a Magnetic Flux Tube Emerging into the Solar Atmosphere T. Magara (Montana State University, USA) September 17, 2002 (Budapest, Hungary) We focus on three solar regions. Each region has a different type of background gas layers with which magnetic field interacts. • The corona (over the photosphere) ... low-density background gas layers • The photosphere ... abrupt change of background gas layers • The convection zone ... high-density background gas layers Corona : Because the background gas pressure is weaker than mag- netic pressure, the magnetic field continues to expand outward. (magnetic-field dominant region) A well-developed magnetic structure is formed. This structure is macroscopically static (force-free), however • outermost area... dynamic (solar wind) • prominence area... mass motion along B • coronal loops... mass motion along B Sometimes explosive events (relaxation of magnetic energy) happen in such a well-developed structure. These events are • flares (produce high energy particles & electromagnetic waves) • prominence eruptions (cool material erupts and disappears) • coronal mass ejections (large amount of mass is ejected into IP) To study various coronal processes, we initially assume a skeleton of magnetic field which provides a model of well-developed coronal structure. Then we in- vestigate its stability and evolution at both linear and nonlinear phases. Input stage: impose various type of perturbations to the system according to the primary purpose of studies perturbation Initial stage: set a skeleton of magnetic field in the atmosphere (eg. potential, force-free, or relaxation state: any magnetohydrostatic To see the thermal and states) dynamical evolutions at the linear and nonlinear phases magnetic reconnection Convection zone: Gas dominant region –> amplification of magnetic field by plasma motion Galloway and Weiss (1981) The convection zone is devided into two regions: flux tube region & field-free region The dynamics of magnetic field in the convection zone is described by ... ‘thin flux tube model’ (Defouw 1976; Roberts & Webb 1978; Parker 1979; Spruit 1981) Various works based on thin flux tube model have provided an important knowledge of • Storage of magnetic field at the base of the convection zone(Choudhuri & Gilman 1987; D'Silva & Chouduri 1993; Fan et al. 1993; Howard 1991; • Stability of intense flux tube in the convection zone Caligari et al. 1995; Fisher et al. 1995) • Nonlinear interacting process of rising flux tube with convective plasma • Macroscopic observable properties of sunspots, such as latitude, tilt angle, and east-west asymmetry Ferriz-Mas (1996) ‘stability analysis of flux tube’ Caligari, Moreno-Insertis, & Schüssler (1995) ‘simulation of rising flux tube’ Fan, Fisher, & McClymont (1994) ‘tile angle of emerging bipolar’ There are other studies focusing on the internal structure of the buoyant flux tube interacting with surrounding convective plasma. Longcope, Fisher, & Arendt (1996) Emonet & Moreno-Insertis (1998) A rising flux tube cannot maintain its integrity unless the internal mag- netic field is sufficiently twisted (2-dimensional MHD simulation). 3-dimensional MHD simulation Dorch & Nordlund (1998) Abbett, Fisher, & Fan (2000) ... in 3-dimensional situation, the amount of twist needed to prevent the disruption of ris- ing flux tube is substantially reduced. Abbett, Fisher, & Fan (2000) Dorch & Nordlund (1998) Photosphere: Intermediate region between solar interior and exterior: • dynamical aspect high gas pressure region –> low pressure region the emergence of magnetic field is a very dynamical process • thermal structure optically thick regime –> optically thin regime the treatment of radiation is very complicated Magara (2001) imulation of emerging flux tube Stein & Nordlund (1998) simulation of solar granulation Emergence of magnetic field lines (Color map: normal component of magnetic field on the surface) Physical processes of flux tube emergence (Magara 2001) Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase I: rising in a highly dense material (subphotpshre) In this simulation, the flux tube almost keeps a circular cross section. – > analyzing the dynamics by using the model of a rigid cylinder rising in a gravitationally stratified layer 2 M + m d z =– M – m g i dt2 i ↓ ≡ dz M – mi × –3 vz =– gt= 4.09 10 t dt M + mi Phase II: flattening & Rayleigh-Taylor instability convective Upper part of rising flux tube enters ‘convective stable stable layer ayer’ and stops rising, although lower part is still rising. ↓ convective unstable layer the flux tube becomes flattened! The upper part of flux tube is subject to the Rayleigh-Taylo instability. The dispersion relation is given by λ λ > C + – – ρ – ρ B 2 ω2 =–gk 0 0 + k2 0 x x ρ+ + ρ– x πρ+ ρ– 0 0 4 0 + 0 ↓ 2 π 2 ω 2 π g π C A λ λ ≡ 4 C A i = β– λ –4 2 for > C g 2 0 +1 λ – 2 – B 8 π p k where p+ = p– + 0 x , β– ≡ 0 , λ≡ x , 0 0 8 π 0 – 2 2 π B0 x p– p+ 2 ≡ 0 0 C A ρ– = ρ+ 0 0 Phase III: Parker instability (nonlinear phase) Self-similar analysis of the nonlinear phase of Parker instability (Shibata et al. 1990) dv 2 z s = d s ≈ g s dt dt2 R VZ matter drains along the tube according to the gravita- tional force. VS s s ∝ exp Ω t Ω ∝ Ω vs = s exp t x Ω = g / R curvature radius: R ∝ vz z –4 ∝ –1 ρ∝ z Bx z In some cases, emerging flux tube cannot expand into the atmosphere... λ λ > C λ λ = C Flattening proceeds and the λ is increasing λ with time R-T unstable condition is sat- isfied, however the flux tube does not enter the Parker in- stability phase (phase III). The reason of no expansion is that the magnetic pressure of flux tube is weaker than surrounding gas pressure. z expansion case no expansion case Emerging magnetic fields do not always expand to form a well-developed coronal structure. If they are magnetically strong, they can expand, other- wise the emerging fields could be easily controlled by strong photospheri motions so that they show an intermittent behavior in the photosphere. Recent development of the study of flux emergence 3-dimensional MHD simulation is now available 2-dimensional case 2-dimensional case 3-dimensional case The plasma contained inside the flux tube The plasma contained inside the flux tube does not drain. does drain. ↓ ↓ The axis of flux tube The flux tube becomes light, hardly emerges into the atmosphere. which enables the tube axis to emerge into the atmosphere. Matsumoto et al. (1998)... well-developed kink state of twisted flux tube might produce a series of sigmoidal coronal structures. Fan (2001) The axis of flux tube can emerge into the atmosphere. the magnetic field and velocity field resulted from the emergence of twisted flux tube are consistent with observational results. Magara & Longcope (2001)... the emergence of twisted magnetic flux tube naturally forms a sigmoidal struc- ture in the atmosphere ∇ ∇ ρ Distribution of vertical forces (– Pg,– Pm, Tm, g) along the outer and inner field lines time = 26 Velocity field on the outer and inner field lines Field-aligned velocity field (simple analytical model) Y Basic equation: ∂ v ∂ ∂v v s =–g Y, d ln ρ =– s g s ∂s ∂ s dt ∂s vs 2 b vs s =2g 2 b – Ys sgn s field line – π a π a X X = a θ + sin θ for – π≤θ≤π Y = b 1 + cos θ : strong density reduction area Strong density reduction occurs in the middle of highly convex field line at both sides of weakly convex field line Expanding field lines and undulating field lines aspect ratio h > d expanding field line neutral line h d aspect ratio h < d undulating field line neutral line How are emerging magnetic fields vertically stratified? force-free z intermediate (gas dominant gas dominant –> magnetic dominant) photosphere Injection of magnetic energy and helicity into the atmosphere Bt2 Magnetic energy: E t = dV M 8 π z ≥ 0 ⋅ Magnetic helicity: HM t = A t B t dV z ≥ 0 We use the concept of the relative helicity (Berger & Field 1984; Finn & Antonsen 1985; DeVore 2000) z × ′ ′ A x, y, z, t = AC x, y,0,t – z B x, y, z , t dz... vector potential for B 0 ∞ ∇× φ ′ ′ AC x, y, z, t = z C x, y, z , t dz... vector potential for the potential field z B x′, y′,0,t φ 1 z ′ ′ C x, y, z, t = π 1/2 dx dy... scalar potential for the potential field 2 2 2 x – x′ + y – y′ + z2 z =0 Magnetic energy flux in the photosphere: 1 1 2 2 FMz=–π Bx vx + By vy Bz dxdy+ π B x + B y vz dxdy z =0 4 z =0 4 shear term emergence term Magnetic helicity flux in the photosphere: FHz=–2A x vx + A y vy Bz dxdy+2A x Bx + A y By vz dxdy z =0 z =0 shear term emergence term Time variation of magnetic energy, helicity, energy flux, and helicity flux × 2 ⋅1026 erg / s × 5 ⋅1027 erg (× 35 s) (× 35 s) × 2 ⋅1035 erg cm × 5 ⋅1033 erg cm / s (× 35 s) (× 35 s) At the early phase, the emergence plays a dominant role in injecting energy and helicity. At the late phase, both terms become small, however the shear term is still significant. Velocity field around magnetic polarity region Rotational flow time = 40 time = 28 A rotational flow appears around peak flux area at the late phase (t = 28, 40). This flow twists vertical magnetic field to inject energy and helicity So far, the flux emergence simulation only covers the initial phase of emergence. A lot of important physical processes remain unclear, such as • long-term evolution toward the formation of active regions • interaction between emerging flux tubes and preexisting coronal fields • heating, radiative cooling, thermal conduction (non-adiabatic evolution of thermal structure) Simulated magnetic region: Active region: • time scale..
Recommended publications
  • Twisted Flux Tube Emergence Creates Solar Active Regions
    Direct evidence: twisted flux tube emergence creates solar active regions MacTaggart D.1, Prior C.2, Raphaldini B.2, Romano, P. 3, Guglielmino, S.L.3 1School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK 2Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK 3INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, I-95123 Catania, Italy The magnetic nature of the formation of solar active regions lies at the heart of understanding solar activity and, in particular, solar eruptions. A widespread model, used in many theoretical studies, simulations and the interpretation of observations1,2,3,4, is that the basic structure of an active region is created by the emergence of a large tube of pre-twisted magnetic field. Despite plausible reasons and the availability of various proxies suggesting the veracity of this model5,6,7, there has not yet been any direct observational evidence of the emergence of large twisted magnetic flux tubes. Thus, the fundamental question, “are active regions formed by large twisted flux tubes?” has remained open. In this work, we answer this question in the affirmative and provide direct evidence to support this. We do this by investigating a robust topological quantity, called magnetic winding8, in solar observations. This quantity, combined with other signatures that are currently available, provides the first direct evidence that large twisted flux tubes do emerge to create active regions. Twisted flux tubes are prominent candidates for the progenitors of solar active regions. Twist allows a flux tube to suffer less deformation in the convection zone compared to untwisted tubes, thus allowing it to survive and reach the photosphere to emerge2,9,10.
    [Show full text]
  • THEMIS-SOHO-Hinode - 2009 SCIENTIFIC PROPOSAL
    OBSERVING TIME PROPOSAL FORM FOR THEMIS-SOHO-Hinode - 2009 SCIENTIFIC PROPOSAL 1 General Information Principal Investigator: Brigitte Schmieder A±liation: Observatoire de Paris, LESIA Telephone: +33 1 45 07 78 17 Email address: [email protected] Co{Investigators(s): G. Aulanier, E.Pariat, J.M. Malherbe, T. Roudier, Guo Yang, Chandra R., V.Bommier, Lopez Ariste A. PIs of other instruments: E. DeLuca, A. Fludra, L. Golub, P.Heinzel, S. Gunar, P. Kotrc, N. Labrosse, Deng Y.Y., Li Hui, W. Uddin, Y. Kitai, A. Berlicki, T. Berger, Gosain S. A±liation(s): Observatoire de Paris (LESIA, LERMA), THEMIS IAC Spain, Observatoire Midi-Pyr¶enn¶ees,NRL (USA), SAO Harvard (USA), Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (UK), UIO (Norv`ege),HAO (USA), Ondrejov (Czech Rep.), University of Wales Aberystwyth, Huairou Solar Observing Station (China), Purple mountain Observatory (China), ARIES, Nainital (India), Hida Observatory (Kyoto, Japan), Bialkov (Poland) Title of Project: JOP157 Activity of magnetic features in the solar atmosphere (emergence, shear, dispersion) Specify the observation modes: MTR [X] IPM [] MSDP [X] Number of days requested: September 23 to October 10 2009 THEMIS - Observing time 2009 proposal 2 2 Proposed programme A - Scienti¯c rationale Concise scienti¯c background of the project, pertinent references; previous work plus justi¯cations for present proposal. The Scienti¯c Objectives and justi¯cation are the following: Emerging magnetic flux and reconnection Young Active Regions and new emerging magnetic flux produce MMFs associated with Eller- man Bombs (EBs). The models of emerging flux tubes assuming an Omega-shape are commonly accepted (observations of Arch Filament Systems, coronal loops).
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma and Magnetic-Field Structure of the Solar Wind at Inertial-Range Scale Sizes Discerned from Statistical Examinations of the Time-Series Measurements
    REVIEW published: 20 May 2020 doi: 10.3389/fspas.2020.00020 Plasma and Magnetic-Field Structure of the Solar Wind at Inertial-Range Scale Sizes Discerned From Statistical Examinations of the Time-Series Measurements Joseph E. Borovsky* Center for Space Plasma Physics, Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO, United States This paper reviews the properties of the magnetic and plasma structure of the solar wind Edited by: 6 Luca Sorriso-Valvo, in the inertial range of spatial scales (500–5 × 10 km), corresponding to spacecraft National Research Council, Italy timescales from 1s to a few hr. Spacecraft data sets at 1AU have been statistically Reviewed by: analyzed to determine the structure properties. The magnetic structure of the solar wind Bernard Vasquez, often has a flux-tube texture, with the magnetic flux tube walls being strong current sheets University of New Hampshire, United States and the field orientation varying strongly from tube to tube. The magnetic tubes also Yasuhito Narita, exhibit distinct plasma properties (e.g., number density, specific entropy), with variations Austrian Academy of Sciences (OAW), Austria in those properties from tube to tube. The ion composition also varies from tube to Julia E. Stawarz, tube, as does the value of the electron heat flux. When the solar wind is Alfvénic, the Imperial College London, magnetic structure of the solar wind moves outward from the Sun faster than the proton United Kingdom plasma does. In the reference frame moving outward with the structure, there are distinct *Correspondence: Joseph E. Borovsky field-aligned plasma flows within each flux tube. In the frame moving with the magnetic [email protected] structure the velocity component perpendicular to the field is approximately zero; this indicates that there is little or no evolution of the magnetic structure as it moves outward Specialty section: This article was submitted to from the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Simultaneous THEMIS Observations in the Near-Tail Portion of the Inner and Outer Plasma Sheet Flux Tubes at Substorm Onset V
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, A00C02, doi:10.1029/2008JA013527, 2008 Click Here for Full Article Simultaneous THEMIS observations in the near-tail portion of the inner and outer plasma sheet flux tubes at substorm onset V. A. Sergeev,1 S. V. Apatenkov,1 V. Angelopoulos,2 J. P. McFadden,3 D. Larson,3 J. W. Bonnell,3 M. Kuznetsova,4 N. Partamies,5 and F. Honary6 Received 23 June 2008; revised 13 August 2008; accepted 22 August 2008; published 19 November 2008. [1] We analyzed the measurements made by two Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) probes in ideal observational conditions (quiet background, near midnight, inside the substorm current wedge) during two distinct isolated substorm onsets, with probe P2 measuring the inner plasma sheet at 8 Re and P1 near the plasma sheet–lobe interface at 11–12 Re. The earliest onset-related strong perturbations were observed by P1; they include the increase of both Bz (dipolarization) and Ey (a few mV/m) as well as the simultaneous drop in total pressure, indicating the unloading process. This was also accompanied by fast inward plasma motion (up to 100 km/s, toward the neutral sheet) and fast plasma sheet thinning while the poleward auroral expansion was in progress in the conjugate ionosphere. These perturbations were followed after 6–8 min by the rapid expansion of the already heated plasma sheet. While in the adjacent lobe during this thinning phase, probe P1 continued to observe intense flux transfer toward the sheet center plane. The inner probe observed intense dipolarization and inward plasma injection but with a smaller flux transfer and starting 1–2 min after the perturbations at P1, supporting the conclusion that onset instability took place tailward of 12 Re.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Flux Ropes in Space Plasmas
    Magnetic Flux Ropes in Space Plasmas Mark Moldwin UCLA 2007 Heliophysics Summer School With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Goal of Lecture • Introduce one of the most ubiquitous features in space plasmas • Describe their Origin, Evolution, Structure, and impact • Will present combination of simulations, observations, and synthesis models What is a Flux Tube? • Ideal MHD’s frozen-in flux condition • Equation of motion has the pressure gradient and Lorentz term on RHS • Magnetic force has two components - magnetic pressure term acting perpendicular to field and a tension term along field. • Can think of flux tubes as mutually repulsive rubber bands Pop Quiz • BACKGROUND: Spacecraft X observes a magnetic field change over Y units of time. • How do you know if the observed change in B is due to the relative motion of a boundary past the spacecraft or dynamics/global change/transient in the background configuration? Lesson • Must make models to understand global structure and dynamics • Must use statistics to understand global structure and dynamics • Must make multiple, simultaneous, distributed measurements to understand global structure and dynamics What are Flux Ropes, and Who Cares? • Magnetized plasmas can form structures on various scales - shocks, discontinuities, waves, flux tubes, current sheets etc. • Some are created by magnetic reconnection and can have sharp and clear boundaries • Provide evidence of dynamics AND can give rise to significant energy and momentum flow from one region to another Coronal Mass Ejections are the primary driver of major Geomagnetic storms Their structure determines their geomagnetic effectiveness Pop Quiz • Draw a cartoon model of the structure produced by magnetic reconnection in the lower corona to make a CME.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Magnetic Flux Tubes in Close Binary Stars
    A&A 405, 303–311 (2003) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030584 & c ESO 2003 Astrophysics Dynamics of magnetic flux tubes in close binary stars II. Nonlinear evolution and surface distributions V. Holzwarth1,2 and M. Sch¨ussler1 1 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Aeronomie, Max-Planck-Str. 2, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews KY16 9SS, UK Received 28 February 2003 / Accepted 18 April 2003 Abstract. Observations of magnetically active close binaries with orbital periods of a few days reveal the existence of starspots at preferred longitudes (with respect to the direction of the companion star). We numerically investigate the non-linear dynamics and evolution of magnetic flux tubes in the convection zone of a fast-rotating component of a close binary system and explore whether the tidal effects are able to generate non-uniformities in the surface distribution of erupting flux tubes. Assuming a synchronised system with a rotation period of two days and consisting of two solar-type components, both the tidal force and the deviation of the stellar structure from spherical shape are considered in lowest-order perturbation theory. The magnetic field is initially stored in the form of toroidal magnetic flux rings within the stably stratified overshoot region beneath the convection zone. Once the field has grown sufficiently strong, instabilities initiate the formation of rising flux loops, which rise through the convection zone and emerge at the stellar surface. We find that although the magnitude of tidal effects is rather small, they nevertheless lead to the formation of clusters of flux tube eruptions at preferred longitudes on opposite sides of the star, which result from the cumulative and resonant character of the action of tidal effects on rising flux tubes.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetosheath Flow Near the Subsolar Magnetopause∷ Zwan&Hyphen;Wolf and Southwood&Hyphen;Kivelson Theories
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 22, NO. 23, PAGES 3275-3278, DECEMBER 1, 1995 Magnetosheath flow near the subsolar magnetopause- Zwan-Wolf and Southwood-Kivelson theories reconciled DavidJ. Southwood I and Margaret G. Kivelson2 Instituteof Geophysicsand PlanetaryPhysics. University of California.Los Angeles Abstract. We reconcilethe superficiallycontradictory theories the flow upstreamof the magnetopause,the magneticfield should of flow immediately upstreamof the subsolarmagnetopause. decreaseand the gaspressure and plasmadensity should increase We show that the formation of a layer of enhancedfield and whilst Zwan and Wolf [1976] predict a region where the field depresseddensity immediately adjacent to the magnetopauseas increasesand the densityand pressuredecrease. Southwoodand predictedby Zwan and Wolf appearsto requirethe presence Kivelson[1992] acknowledgedthe differencebetween the Zwanand upstreamof a regionof enhancedpressure and field rarel•tction Wo/f[1976]predictions and their own theory. It is thepurpose of aspredicted by Southwoodand Kivelson. We thusargue that the thispaper to link thesetwo apparentlycontradictory notions and to detachedregions of enhanceddensity and the depletion layer arguethat not only do botheffects occur in practicebut they arepart adjacentto the magnetopauseare actually manifestationsof a of one and the same effect. singlephenomenon. The models of the solar wind flow around the Earth's magnetospherein the gas dynamic limit include the field only Introduction kinematically [Spreiter and Alksne, 1969; 1970]. The approach would be entirely adequateif the gas pressurebehind the shock The structureof the magnetosheathfield and flow patternnear everywheregreatly exceededthe magneticpressure. As Zwan and the magnetopauseis of greatinterest in solarterrestrial physics, the Wo/f[1976] point out, it is implicit in Alksne's[1967] calculations region marking as it does the interface between solar wind and that there alwayswill be a regionnear the magnetopausewhere field terrestrialplasma regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Magnetic Flux Tubes and the Dynamo Problem
    5 Magnetic flux tubes and the dynamo problem Manfred Schüssler and Antonio Ferriz-Mas The observed properties of the magnetic field in the solar photosphere and theoretical studies of magneto-convection in electrically well-conducting fluids suggest that the magnetic field in stellar convection zones is quite inhomogeneous: magnetic flux is concentrated into magnetic flux tubes embedded in significantly less magnetized plasma. Such a state of the magnetic field potentially has strong implications for stellar dynamo theory since the dynamics of an ensemble of flux tubes is rather different from that of a more uniform field and new phenomena like magnetic buoyancy appear. If the diameter of a magnetic flux tube is much smaller than any other relevant length scale, the MHD equations governing its evolution can be considerably simplified in terms of the thin- flux-tube approximation. Studies of thin flux tubes in comparison with observed properties of sunspot groups have led to far-reaching conclusions about the nature of the dynamo-generated magnetic field in the solar interior. The storage of magnetic flux for periods comparable to the amplification time of the dynamo requires the compensation of magnetic buoyancy by a stably stratified medium, a situation realized in a layer of overshooting convection at the bottom of the convection zone. Flux tubes stored in mechanical force equilibrium in this layer become unstable with respect to an undular instability once a critical field strength is exceeded, flux loops rise through the convection zone and erupt as bipolar magnetic regions at the surface. For parameter values relevant for the solar case, the critical field strength is of the order of 105 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Generation of Vortex and Magnetic Fielda) S
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS 18, 055701 (2011) Relativistic generation of vortex and magnetic fielda) S. M. Mahajan1,b) and Z. Yoshida2 1Institute for Fusion Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA 2Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-8561, Japan (Received 24 November 2010; accepted 1 February 2011; published online 8 April 2011) The implications of the recently demonstrated relativistic mechanism for generating generalized vorticity in purely ideal dynamics [Mahajan and Yoshida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 095005 (2010)] are worked out. The said mechanism has its origin in the space-time distortion caused by the demands of special relativity; these distortions break the topological constraint (conservation of generalized helicity) forbidding the emergence of magnetic field (a generalized vorticity) in an ideal nonrelativistic dynamics. After delineating the steps in the “evolution” of vortex dynamics, as the physical system goes from a nonrelativistic to a relativistically fast and hot plasma, a simple theory is developed to disentangle the two distinct components comprising the generalized vorticity—the magnetic field and the thermal-kinetic vorticity. The “strength” of the new universal mechanism is, then, estimated for a few representative cases; in particular, the level of seed fields, created in the cosmic setting of the early hot universe filled with relativistic particle–antiparticle pairs (up to the end of the electron–positron era), are computed. Possible applications of the mechanism in intense laser produced plasmas are also explored. It is suggested that highly relativistic laser plasma could provide a laboratory for testing the essence of the relativistic drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Vortices and Flux Ropes in Electron MHD Plasmas I
    Published, Physica Scripta T84, 112-116 (2000) Vortices and Flux Ropes in Electron MHD Plasmas I. R. L. Stenzel,∗ J. M. Urrutia, and M. C. Griskey Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547 Laboratory experiments are reviewed which demonstrate the existence and properties of three- dimensional vortices in Electron MHD (EMHD) plasmas. In this parameter regime the electrons form a magnetized fluid which is charge-neutralized by unmagnetized ions. The observed vortices are time-varying flows in the electron fluid which produce currents and magnetic fields, the latter superimposed on a uniform dc magnetic field B0. The topology of the time-varying flows and fields can be described by linked toroidal and poloidal vector fields with amplitude distributions ranging from spherical to cylindrical shape. Vortices can be excited with pulsed currents to electrodes, pulsed currents in magnetic loop antennas, and heat pulses. The vortices propagate in the whistler mode along the mean field B0. In the presence of dissipation, magnetic self-helicity and energy decay at the same rate. Reversal of B0 or propagation direction changes the sign of the helicity. Helicity injection produces directional emission of vortices. Reflection of a vortex violates helicity conservation and field-line tying. Part I of two companion papers reviews the linear vortex properties while the companion Part II describes nonlinear EMHD phenomena and instabilities. I. INTRODUCTION helicity generation by instabiliites are reviewed in Part II. Vortices are common phenomena in fluids, gases, and plasmas. They often arise from velocity shear such as II. EXPERIMENTAL ARRANGEMENT occur in flows past obstacles (for example, von Kar- man vortex streets [1], Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities [2], drift waves [3], ion temperature gradient driven vor- The experiments are performed in a large laboratory tices [4], black auroras [5]) or differential rotations (cy- plasma device sketched schematically in 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hydrodynamic Model for Plasmasphere Refilling Following
    A Hydrodynamic Model for Plasmasphere Refilling Following Geomagnetic Storms K Chatterjee, R.W. Schunk (Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences, Utah State University, 4405 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4405; Email: [email protected], [email protected]) The refilling of the plasmasphere following a geomagnetic storm remains one of the longstanding problems involving ionosphere-magnetosphere coupling. Both diffusion and hydrodynamic approximations have been adopted for the modeling and solution of this problem. The diffusion approximation neglects the nonlinear inertial term in the momentum equation and so this approximation is not rigorously valid immediately after a storm. The principle focus of this work is the formulation and development of a hydrodynamic refilling model (that includes the nonlinear inertial term) using the flux- corrected transport method, a numerical method that is extremely well suited to handling nonlinear problems with shocks and discontinuities. In a previous study, this model has been validated against exact analytical benchmark problems and in this study, the model is used to describe plasmasphere refilling. The plasma transport equations are solved along one-dimensional closed magnetic field lines that connect conjugate ionospheres and the model currently includes three ions (H+, O+, He+) and two neutral (O, H) species. In this study, each ion species under consideration has been modeled as two separate streams emanating from the conjugate hemispheres and the model correctly predicts supersonic ion speeds and the presence of high levels of helium during the early hours of refilling. The ultimate objective of this research is the development of a three-dimensional model for the plasmasphere refilling problem, and with additional development, the same methodology can be applied to the study of other complex space plasma coupling problems in closed flux tube geometries.
    [Show full text]
  • THEMIS ESA First Science Results and Performance Issues
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-008-9433-1 THEMIS ESA First Science Results and Performance Issues J.P. McFadden · C.W. Carlson · D. Larson · J. Bonnell · F. Mozer · V. Angelopoulos · K.-H. Glassmeier · U. Auster Received: 5 April 2008 / Accepted: 25 August 2008 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract Early observations by the THEMIS ESA plasma instrument have revealed new details of the dayside magnetosphere. As an introduction to THEMIS plasma data, this pa- per presents observations of plasmaspheric plumes, ionospheric ion outflows, field line reso- nances, structure at the low latitude boundary layer, flux transfer events at the magnetopause, and wave and particle interactions at the bow shock. These observations demonstrate the ca- pabilities of the plasma sensors and the synergy of its measurements with the other THEMIS experiments. In addition, the paper includes discussions of various performance issues with the ESA instrument such as sources of sensor background, measurement limitations, and data formatting problems. These initial results demonstrate successful achievement of all measurement objectives for the plasma instrument. Keywords THEMIS · Magnetosphere · Magnetopause · Bow shock · Instrument performance PACS 94.80.+g · 06.20.Fb · 94.30.C- · 94.05.-a · 07.87.+v 1 Introduction The THEMIS mission provides the first multi-satellite measurements of the dayside mag- netosphere, magnetopause and bow shock utilizing a string of pearls orbit near the ecliptic plane (Angelopoulos 2008). During a 7 month coast phase, the instruments were commis- sioned and cross-calibrated while spacecraft separations were adjusted from a few hundred J.P. McFadden () · C.W. Carlson · D.
    [Show full text]