DOCSLIB.ORG

2008 NGA Centennial Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2008 NGA Centennial Meeting 1 1 2 3 4 5 NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION 6 2008 CENTENNIAL MEETING 7 PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 8 9 - - - 10 11 PLENARY SESSION 12 JULY 13, 2008 13 CREATING A DIVERSE ENERGY PORTFOLIO 14 15 - - - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 VERITEXT NATIONAL COURT REPORTING COMPANY 24 KNIPES COHEN 1801 Market Street - Suite 1800 25 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 2 1 - - - I N D E X 2 - - - 3 PAGE 4 Governor Tim Pawlenty, Chair 3 5 6 Robert A. Malone, 18 Chairman and President, BP America, Inc. 7 8 Vijay V. Vaitheeswatan, 53 Award-Winning Correspondent, The Economist 9 10 Distinguished Service Awards 91 11 Corporate Fellows Tenure Awards 109 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 1 2 CHAIRMAN PAWLENTY: Good morning, 3 everybody; good morning, distinguished guests. 4 I now call to order the 100th 5 Annual Meeting of the National Governors 6 Association. I would like to begin by saying 7 what a privilege it has been to serve as the 8 National Governors Association Chair over these 9 past 12 months. 10 We also want to welcome all of 11 our governors here. We would like to have one 12 of our new governors here this morning as well, 13 Governor Paterson from New York, but I think he 14 was called back to New York on state business, 15 but we certainly welcome him and are excited to 16 get to know him better and work with him as one 17 of our colleagues. 18 At this session, along with 19 hearing from two notable speakers on creating a 20 diverse energy portfolio, we will recognize our 21 Distinguished Service Award winners and our 15- 22 and 20-year Corporate Fellows, but first we 23 need to do a little housekeeping and procedural 24 business, and I need to have a motion to adopt 25 the Rules of Procedure for the meeting, and I 4 1 2 understand Governor Rendell has been carefully 3 studying this motion and is prepared to make 4 a . 5 GOVERNOR RENDELL: So moved. 6 CHAIRMAN PAWLENTY: All right. 7 The motion has been made. 8 Just as a quick reminder, part of 9 the rules require that any governor who wants 10 to submit a new policy or resolution for 11 adoption at this meeting will need a 12 three-fourths vote to suspend the rules, and 13 please submit any proposal to that effect to 14 David Quam by 5:00 p.m. today. 15 Now we will vote on Governor 16 Rendell's inspiring motion. All those in favor 17 say aye. 18 GOVERNORS: Aye. 19 CHAIRMAN PAWLENTY: Opposed say 20 no. 21 (No response.) 22 CHAIRMAN PAWLENTY: The motion 23 prevails, and the rules are adopted. 24 Now I'll announce the appointment 25 of the following governors to the Nominating 5 1 2 Committee for the 2008-2009 NGA Executive 3 Committee. The Nominating Committee will 4 consist of Governor Rounds, Governor Henry, 5 Governor Rell, Governor Gregoire and Governor 6 Minner, who will serve as the Chair. 7 I also want to announce the 8 presence today of some distinguished guests we 9 have, from, first of all, the National 10 U.S.-Arab Chamber of Commerce, the Japan Global 11 Government Center, as well as Dean Del Mastro, 12 a member of the Canadian Parliament, Senator 13 Jeramiehl Grafstein, and the British Ambassador 14 to the U.S., Sir Nigel Sheinwald. We also have 15 with us Mr. Kuse, who is a former member of the 16 Japan House of Counsillors. 17 Please join me in welcoming all 18 of our special and distinguished foreign 19 guests. 20 I also think it's important that 21 we recognize and appreciate the incredible and 22 really spectacular hospitality of Governor 23 Rendell and the Honorable Judge Midge Rendell. 24 I think you have all enjoyed their hospitality, 25 and I know behind the scenes how hard Ed worked 6 1 2 to make this a reality, both in terms of the 3 planning and the fundraising and the like. An 4 event of this magnitude doesn't happen easily. 5 Let's once again thank Governor Rendell for his 6 tremendous hospitality. 7 We will hear from our speakers in 8 just a moment, but I want to just share a few 9 overview thoughts and reflections about the 10 initiative for this year, which is Securing a 11 Clean Energy Future. We kicked this off at 12 last year's summer meeting in Traverse City, 13 Michigan, which Governor Granholm graciously 14 hosted. It had four and continues to have four 15 areas of focus. The first is recognizing the 16 notion that the cheapest and cleanest energy we 17 have is the energy we don't use, and while we 18 are all anxious to move on to the important 19 topics of technology breakthroughs and 20 fundamental shifts in the current energy 21 platform, we shouldn't overlook the low-hanging 22 fruit and relatively easy-to-obtain success and 23 progress we can make in energy conservation and 24 efficiency. Second, we want to make sure the 25 initiative focused on promoting and encouraging 7 1 2 a movement towards alternative fuel and 3 alternative energy more broadly. The third area 4 was to try to clean up our emissions, and the 5 fourth was to try to encourage best practices 6 as it related to research and development. 7 The activities surrounding the 8 initiative included a series of summits across 9 the country. We had one in Florida hosted by 10 Governor Crist regarding alternative fuels and 11 next generation vehicles. Governor Gregoire 12 hosted a summit in the State of Washington 13 relating to research and development and 14 technological breakthroughs. Governor Sebelius 15 hosted a power generation summit in Kansas, and 16 we are grateful for that. 17 This initiative also focused on a 18 series of public-private partnerships, 19 including a partnership with Google and Intel 20 on climate savers, which related to energy 21 efficiency and conservation, particularly as it 22 related to technological appliances like 23 computers. We partnered with the Discovery 24 Channel and many of their sister outlets and 25 channels to promote these issues across their 8 1 2 airwaves, and they have been tremendous 3 partners with us. WalMart stepped up as part 4 of a public-private partnership to offer energy 5 audits for state capitals across the country, 6 and in just a moment we will be saying more 7 about a new partnership with General Motors as 8 it relates to their willingness to help us 9 promote alternative fuels and E-85 pumps. 10 I also want to remind you that 11 there are a series of publications that have 12 been finalized and now are available to you in 13 front of the governors, and to our guests and 14 members of the press here, these are available 15 to you as well. The initiative started out 16 last year with a call to action, which kind of 17 framed the initiative and the challenge and the 18 opportunity that we are facing. There was also 19 an earlier publication on biofuels and greener 20 fuels. 21 Today in front of you are four 22 more publications that I hope that you or your 23 staff will find to be of interest and 24 beneficial. One relates to research and 25 development best practices from around the 9 1 2 country, another relates to power generation, a 3 third relates to the best practices of the 4 states and activities of the states over the 5 last year--that's the thicker one, I think you 6 will find interesting materials in there--and 7 last is a conservation and efficiency 8 publication that we think will be of help to 9 you also. 10 I also want to thank the 11 Secretary of Energy, Secretary Bodman, and his 12 staff, Assistant Secretary Andrew Karsner, who 13 is with us here this morning. They have been 14 generous partners with us in the interest of a 15 federal-state partnership, providing an 16 $850,000 grant over the past year to fund some 17 of these activities and the grants that will be 18 part of the follow-on activities of this 19 initiative. 20 Assistant Secretary Karsner 21 announced this morning that they are going to 22 double down that amount for the next year for 23 another $850,000, and he also announced this 24 morning at an earlier press conference that the 25 department is going to sign up for an up to 10 1 2 $5 million commitment to sustain these 3 activities through the NGA over the next five 4 years, and they view that as binding regardless 5 of who wins the office of presidency and which 6 administration will come forward. They feel 7 it's that important from a structural and 8 sustainability standpoint. 9 Then before we introduce our 10 speakers this morning, in terms of kind of the 11 tone and attitude of this nationally, 12 obviously, when this started a year ago in 13 Traverse City, Michigan, I think oil was about 14 $80 a barrel, maybe a little less, and as we 15 gather here today just one year later oil has 16 increased to nearly . well, it bounces around a 17 little bit but say $140 a barrel on average.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Debt Ceiling Crisis Splits Delegation Vote Parts GOP and Dems, Senate Race Could Hinge on How It’S Perceived by BRIAN A
    V17, N1 Thursday, Aug. 4, 2011 Debt ceiling crisis splits delegation Vote parts GOP and Dems, Senate race could hinge on how it’s perceived By BRIAN A. HOWEY, in Indianapolis and MARK SCHOEFF JR. in Washington WASHINGTON - The Tea Party set the agenda. The Republican old-guard reasserted itself in the final hours and forged a deal no one is really happy with. President Obama, faced with a 9.2 percent jobless rate, couldn’t afford to let the United States slip into default, which was the universally unaccept- able result to everyone but elements of the Tea Party and Club for Growth. Republican U.S. Reps. Marlin Stutzman, Mike Pence, Todd Young, Todd Republicans, controlling a little over half of Rokita and Larry Buchson played defining roles in the debt ceiling debate. one chamber in Congress, called the President’s bluff (Pence Photo) on this “manufactured crisis” while manufacturing Rep. Mike Pence, facing the races of their political lives in plants across the country were quiet. Obama, without a 2012, voted for the measure. deal of his own, had to swallow this deal while his base Two Republicans in the safest districts, U.S. Reps. grimaced over a “Satan sandwich.” Todd Rokita and Marlin Stutzman, voted against the mea- There were $1.5 trillion in cuts, no tax increases, sure, joining liberal Reps. Andre Carson and Pete Visclosky, and a new super committee that will try to find more per- as well as Sen. Dan Coats. And the most vulnerable, U.S. manent solutions this fall. Rep. Dan Burton, also voted no.
    [Show full text]
  • HPI Interview: Hill and Policy Crises Attorney General Talks of Drug Epidemics, Cyber and Terror Threats by BRIAN A
    V22, N39 Thursday, June 15, 2017 HPI Interview: Hill and policy crises Attorney general talks of drug epidemics, cyber and terror threats By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Last week Howey Politics Indiana reported that new Attorney General Curtis Hill has been approached about a U.S. Senate run in 2018. In this HPI Interview, we talked with Hill at the Statehouse about his first five months after spending nearly three decades working in the Elkhart County prosecutor’s office, the last 14 in that elected position. He entered the at- For instance, the Washington Post reported that torney general office this year with some seismic issues the opioid epidemic that has “ravaged life expectancy ranging from an opioid and methamphetamine epidemic, among economically stressed white Americans is taking a to cyber security issues that are hitting Hoosier businesses and consumers in the wallet. Continued on page 3 Mayor Pete heads to Iowa By CHRIS SAUTTER WASHINGTON – It is said that no politician travels to Iowa to give a speech unless they plan to run for presi- dent. So the announcement this week that South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg is scheduled to be a headline speaker at a Des Moines political event “We may have our differences in September begs the question: What is Pete up to? He will be but we do well in times like these speaking along with Oregon Sen. that everyone who serves in our Jeff Merkley, who is by all ac- counts mulling a presidential run. nation’s capital is here because Undoubtedly, Buttigieg is a rising star in the Democratic above all they love our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • F~ #Jr 4E4!'£'7"~#T:::S, M
    F. NEWTON HUGHES IMAUGURAL SEMINAR University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta / ,. May L 1987 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mrs. Hughes, Honorable Ministers, Dean Smith, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen. On behalf of our contingent ON~ t"J4~~ from Colorado, mo 01 whom will be arriving later this evening, we are honored to participate in this Inaugural Seminar in honor of Mr, F. Newton Hug,es. Indeed, it is a pleasure to be here . .f~ #Jr4E4!'£'7"~#t:::S, M_ The Governor of Colorado, the Honorable Roy Romer,Aasked me to personally extend to you an invitation to visit Colorado and discuss our mutual economic objective.$ with him personally at your convenience. This invitation was extended during a conversation with the Governor at a reception for our congressional delegation in connection with the Annual Meeting of the U.S. Charrber of Commerce in Washington just this past Monday evening. In the short period of time since his inauguration in January, the Governor has launched an aggressive program to tell the world that Coloracb is "open for business", He is dedicated to getting Colorado's ecooomy back on track. Our former governor of 12 years was general 1y perceived as anti -business and earned his first election by convincing the people of Colorado to deny the winter olvmoics for Denver even after ~nver had been selected by the International Olympic Committee. At this point in the new governor's administration, we, in the business community, are quite optimistic and very supportive. My role this evening is to address you as a representative of the £Ql.Qr:_ado Association of Commerce _and Industry, our State Chamber of Commerce, rather than as a venture capitalist.
    [Show full text]
  • Notre Dame Review Notre Dame Review
    NOTRE DAME REVIEW NOTRE DAME REVIEW NUMBER 8 Editors John Matthias William O'Rourke Senior Editor Steve Tomasula Founding Editor Valerie Sayers Managing Editor Editorial Assistants Kathleen J. Canavan Kelley Beeson Stacy Cartledge R. Thomas Coyne Contributing Editors Douglas Curran Matthew Benedict Jeanne DeVita Gerald Bruns Shannon Doyne Seamus Deane Anthony D'Souza Stephen Fredman Katie Lehman Sonia Gernes Marinella Macree Jere Odell Tom O'Connor Kymberly Taylor Haywood Rod Phasouk James Walton Ginger Piotter Henry Weinfield Laura Schafer Donald Schindler Elizabeth Smith-Meyer Charles Walton The Notre Dame Review is published semi-annually. Subscriptions: $15(individuals) or $20 (institu- tions) per year. Single Copy price: $8. Distributed by Media Solutions, Huntsville, Alabama and International Periodical Distributors, Solana Beach, California. We welcome manuscripts, which are read from September through April. Please include a SASE for return. Please send all subscription and editorial correspondence to: Notre Dame Review, The Creative Writing Program, Department of English, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. Notre Dame Review copyright 1999 by the University of Notre Dame ISSN: 1082-1864 Place/Displacement ISBN 1-892492-07-5 Cover Art: "Diagram for the Apprehension of Simple Forces," cibiachrome, 1997, 12 x 15 inches, by Jason Salavon. Courtesy of Peter Miller Gallery, Chicago. CONTENTS Genghis Khan story ..................................................................... 1 Yanbing Chen Anstruther; Knowledge; Alford
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Secretaries & Executive Directors
    History of MACo 5 Executive Secretaries & Executive Directors Robert Lovelace: June 1960 - November 1961 Bill Ratchford: November 1961 - October 1962 Thomas Kelly: October 1962 - January 1964 Bill Ratchford: January 1964 - November 1968 Joe Murnane: November 1968 - May 1978 Wallace “Wally” Hutton: October 1978 - July 1981 Althea “Tee” O'Connor: September 1981 - August 1985 Raquel Sanudo: June 1985 - June 1991 David Bliden: July 1991 - Present Since the first Executive Director was hired in 1960, the men and women who have held that position have come from varied career backgrounds. The responsibilities of the position have changed and duties have been expanded and diversified. Similarly, the MACo staff has grown, from the charter staff of Executive Secretary Lovelace and a stenographer, to the seven staff members who serve the organization today. Each Executive Director has not only redefined the position, but, along with his or her staff, has helped to shape and develop MACo itself. Robert Lovelace As discussed in the previous chapter, Robert Lovelace, a former city manager, began his duties with the Association upon the establishment of the Symons Hall office beginning June 1, 1960. Per the agreement with the University of Maryland, he joined their staff as a lecturer in American Government. As the first Executive Secretary, as it was then called, Lovelace set the pace and provided a basic structure for those that would come after him. As is the case today, in 1960 the SACCOM Board was made up of county officials for whom Association service was only one aspect of their responsibilities; Lovelace was the first person involved with the organization that could focus wholly on its development.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Music in the United States Before the Great Depression
    American Music in the 20th Century 6 Chapter 2 Music in the United States Before the Great Depression Background: The United States in 1900-1929 In 1920 in the US - Average annual income = $1,100 - Average purchase price of a house = $4,000 - A year's tuition at Harvard University = $200 - Average price of a car = $600 - A gallon of gas = 20 cents - A loaf of Bread = 20 cents Between 1900 and the October 1929 stock market crash that triggered the Great Depression, the United States population grew By 47 million citizens (from 76 million to 123 million). Guided by the vision of presidents Theodore Roosevelt1 and William Taft,2 the US 1) began exerting greater political influence in North America and the Caribbean.3 2) completed the Panama Canal4—making it much faster and cheaper to ship its goods around the world. 3) entered its "Progressive Era" by a) passing anti-trust laws to Break up corporate monopolies, b) abolishing child labor in favor of federally-funded puBlic education, and c) initiating the first federal oversight of food and drug quality. 4) grew to 48 states coast-to-coast (1912). 5) ratified the 16th Amendment—estaBlishing a federal income tax (1913). In addition, by 1901, the Lucas brothers had developed a reliaBle process to extract crude oil from underground, which soon massively increased the worldwide supply of oil while significantly lowering its price. This turned the US into the leader of the new energy technology for the next 60 years, and opened the possibility for numerous new oil-reliant inventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement Future Development and Operations
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND June 2001 Fort George G. Meade, Maryland Directorate of Public Works Environmental Management Office Fort Meade, Maryland 20755 U.S. Army Military District of Washington Fort Lesley J. McNair Washington, D.C. 20319 .... FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAcrSTATMENT···- LEAD AGENCY: Department of the Army, Military District of Washington. TITLE OF THE PROPOSED ACTION: Future Development and Operations Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. AFFECTED JURISDICTION: State of Maryland, Anne Arundel and Howard Counties. PROPONENT REVIEWED BY: Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, Directorate of Public Works, Environmental Management Office, Fort Meade, Maryland 20755. REVIEWED BY: U.S. Army Military District of Washington, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, D.C. 20319. END OF WAITING PERIOD AFTER FILING: 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. ABSTRACT: An environmental assessment (EA) prepared in April 1999 determined that potentially significant adverse impacts to traffic and air quality could result from the proposed future development and operations at Fort Meade. Pursuant to NEPA, this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was undertaken to evaluate, in detail, the environmental and socioeconomic effects of future development and operations at the installation, specifically planned new construction and associated demolition activities. The Proposed Action includes development and operations expected to occur on the installation between 2001 and 2005. To provide the specificity needed for reasonable predictions of environmental consequences, 11 projects were identified by the Fort Meade Master Planner for consideration within the Proposed Action as being representative of the expected build out. Alternative A consists of constructing 9 of the 11 projects, excluding the two projects least likely to occur; their elimination reduces the number of additional personnel by 272, or 30 percent of the 912 additional personnel included in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    OFFICE OF GOVERNOR TIM PAWLENTY 130 State Capitol ♦ Saint Paul, MN 55155 ♦ (651) 296-0001 NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Brian McClung January 6, 2010 (651) 296-0001 GOVERNOR PAWLENTY APPOINTS JONES TO AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION BOARD Saint Paul – Governor Tim Pawlenty today announced the appointment of Kevin M. Jones to the Agricultural Chemical Response Compensation Board. Jones, of St. James, is the general manager of NuWay Cooperative in Trimont. He has held a number of positions with NuWay during the 15-and-a-half years he has been with the Coop. Previously, he worked in the agronomy and feed division with Watonwan Farm Service, and worked on a family farm. Jones earned an agribusiness management degree from Ridgewater College in Willmar, and is a certified crop advisor. He is a member of the Farm Bureau, Statewide Managers Association, Southern Minnesota Managers Association, Minnesota Petroleum Association, Minnesota Propane Gas Association, Cooperative Network, and Minnesota Crop Protection Retailers. Jones replaces Jeff Like on the Agricultural Chemical Response Compensation Board as a representative of agricultural chemical retailers to complete a four-year term that expires on January 2, 2012. The Agricultural Chemical Response and Reimbursement Account (ACRRA) was created under the 1989 Minnesota Ground Water Protection Act to provide financial assistance to cleanup agricultural chemical contamination. The program is funded through annual surcharges on pesticide and fertilizer sales, and on applicator and dealer licenses. The ACRRA funds are administered by the Agricultural Chemical Response Compensation Board. The five-member board consists of representatives from the Minnesota Departments of Agriculture and Commerce, and three members appointed by the Governor, including a representative of farmers, agricultural chemical manufacturers and wholesalers, and dealers who sell agricultural chemicals at retail.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota 2012 President Poll
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 8, 2010 INTERVIEWS: DEAN DEBNAM 888-621-6988 / 919-880-4888 (serious media inquiries only please, other questions can be directed to Tom Jensen) QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POLL: TOM JENSEN 919-744-6312 Obama leads all Republicans in MN, Romney bests Pawlenty Raleigh, N.C. – President Obama won Minnesota by about ten points over John McCain two years ago. At this early point in the 2012 cycle, PPP finds that the candidate who comes closest to beating him is not the one who would like to ride his record from two terms as the state’s governor to the White House. In fact, it is the same candidate who comes closest in his own two native states—nearby Michigan and far-away Massachusetts—as well as nationally and in a number of other states: Mitt Romney. But even Romney comes no closer than five points, and Obama tops the candidates other than Romney and Tim Pawlenty by double digits. Pawlenty can only muster 43% to Obama’s 51%, which essentially mirrors the governor’s 43-53 job approval rating as he prepares to leave office. Meanwhile, Romney holds Obama to 47% and gets 42% himself. Mike Huckabee lags, 40-50; Newt Gingrich, 38-51; and Sarah Palin, frequently bringing up the rear, 36-54. As in Michigan, the president has his base almost universally behind him, earning 92% (against Romney) to 95% (Palin and Pawlenty) of Democrats’ votes. But no Republican can do better than 90% of the GOP (Pawlenty); Palin gets only 76%. Obama also wins independents by two (Romney) to 25 points (Palin).
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Restorative Justice Initiative V. Hogan
    Case 1:16-cv-01021-ELH Document 1 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MARYLAND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INITIATIVE, 1111 Park Avenue, Suite 151 Baltimore, MD 21201 County of Residence: Baltimore City CALVIN MCNEILL # 163182 Jessup Correctional Institution 7800 House of Correction Road Jessup, MD 20794 County of Residence: Anne Arundel NATHANIEL FOSTER # 174-966 COMPLAINT FOR Maryland Correctional Institution DECLARATORY RELIEF, Hagerstown INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND 18601 Roxbury Road ATTORNEY’S FEES Hagerstown, MD 21746 County of Residence: Washington Civil Action No. ________________ KENNETH TUCKER # 130-850 Jessup Correctional Institution 7800 House of Correction Road Jessup, MD 20794 County of Residence: Anne Arundel Plaintiffs, v. GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN, In his official capacity 100 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 County of Residence: Anne Arundel ! 1! ! Case 1:16-cv-01021-ELH Document 1 Filed 04/06/16 Page 2 of 61 DAVID BLUMBERG, In his official capacity Hampton Plaza, 300 East Joppa Road Suite 1000 Towson, Maryland 21286 County of Residence: Baltimore STEPHEN MOYER, In his official capacity Hampton Plaza, 300 East Joppa Road Suite 1000 Towson, Maryland 21286 County of Residence: Baltimore WAYNE WEBB, In his official capacity Hampton Plaza, 300 East Joppa Road Suite 1000 Towson, Maryland 21286 County of Residence: Baltimore Defendants. COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE CASE 1. This challenge is brought by and on behalf of Maryland “juvenile lifers” -- individuals who were sentenced to life in prison in state courts for acts committed when they were minors, without appropriate consideration of their youth. Plaintiffs have been and continue to be denied a meaningful opportunity for release, in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S.
    [Show full text]