DOCSLIB.ORG

Erasmus: Facts, Figures & Trends

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Erasmus: Facts, Figures & Trends Erasmus Facts, Figures & Trends The European Union support for student and staff exchanges and university cooperation in 2013-2014 Education and Training Acronyms for country names ISO Code Country Name AT Austria LT Lithuania BE Belgium LU Luxembourg BG Bulgaria LV Latvia CH Switzerland MK Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia CY Cyprus MT Malta CZ Czech Republic NL Netherlands DE Germany NO Norway DK Denmark PL Poland EE Estonia PT Portugal GR Greece RO Romania ES Spain SE Sweden FI Finland SI Slovenia FR France SK Slovakia HR Croatia UK United Kingdom HU Hungary TR Turkey IE Ireland IS Iceland IT Italy LI Liechtenstein Disclaimer The data used in this report has been provided by the higher education institutions and validated by 10 October 2015 by the National Agencies of the 34 countries participating in the Erasmus programme (Erasmus decentralised actions) and by the Education Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (Erasmus centralised actions, Erasmus Mundus, Jean Monnet and Tempus) by 10 October 2015. The European Commission makes its best efforts to ensure the accuracy of the data, but cannot be held responsible for any errors the source data may nevertheless contain. © European Commission, 2015 Responsible editor: Unit B1 ‘Higher education’, Directorate-General for Education and Culture, European Commission, Brussels Table of In a nutshell: Erasmus and international higher education programmes (2007-2013) . 4 contents Erasmus Student Mobility . .6 Erasmus Staff Mobility . 10 Erasmus Intensive Programmes . .14 Erasmus Intensive Language Courses . 16 Erasmus Higher Education Cooperation Projects . 18 Erasmus Mundus . 22 Jean Monnet . 24 Tempus . 26 Annexes . 29 4 | ERASMUS - FACTS, FIGURES & TRENDS Erasmus+, now already in its second year, has started 28 EU Member States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, In a nutshell: delivering promising results, including a higher Switzerland, Turkey and for the first time, the former recognition rate for ECTS credits earned abroad by Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. With a budget of Erasmus and students, a higher quality of mobility with better over €580 million in 2013-2014, the highest annual linguistic preparation and better accessibility. By amount of the seven-year period, 272 000 students international removing barriers to mobility, Erasmus+ will open and over 57 000 staff spent time abroad. the minds of another two million students, who Erasmus mobility, with its focus on skills development will be better equipped to build a more cohesive higher education for employability and active citizenship, is a and competitive society. Built on foundations laid central element of the European Commission’s by Erasmus, Erasmus+ provides opportunities for programmes strategies. Mobility contributes to combatting stronger cooperation between higher education youth unemployment, an objective which features institutions and their stakeholders. This will increase prominently in the Europe 2020 strategy for growth (2007-2013) innovation and enhance social inclusion, which is and jobs. It also equips the new generation with social, an essential factor in preventing radicalisation and civic and intercultural skills, an essential element of terrorism. the 2015 Paris Declaration following the terrorist Although it is still too early to measure the impact attacks in Paris and Copenhagen. of Erasmus+, we can learn a lot from the previous Student mobility contributes to individuals’ personal programme. This brochure not only presents the and professional development and equips them results of the last academic year 2013-2014, but also with transferable skills that are valued by employers provides an overview of the main achievements of and society. Students certainly improve their foreign Erasmus under the EU’s Lifelong Learning Programme language skills and develop greater intercultural (LLP) during 2007-2013. awareness; but they also develop soft skills, such With a budget of €3.1 billion Erasmus provided grants as being able to quickly adapt to changes and to 1.6 million students to study and train abroad new situations, solve problems, work in teams, and to 300 000 academic and administrative staff think critically, be tolerant of different views and to teach and learn new practices abroad. Overall, by communicate effectively. A 20141 study showed that the end of the academic year 2013-14, the Erasmus the risk of long-term unemployment at least halved programme had supported 3.3 million Erasmus for mobile students compared to those who stay at students and 470 000 staff since its launch home. Mobility boosts job prospects, encourages 27 years ago. labour market mobility and opens minds to different cultures. A third of former Erasmus students now live In 1987, 3 244 students from 11 countries spent a with a partner of a different nationality. study period abroad on Erasmus. During 2013-14, some 34 countries took part in the programme: the IN A NUTSHELL: ERASMUS AND INTERNATIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES (2007-2013) | 5 Since its launch in 1987, the Erasmus programme But Erasmus is more than just student and staff contributed to its modernisation, and paved the way has seen not only a constant increase in the number exchanges. Funding around 460 transnational for the Bologna Process. It contributes substantially of students taking part, but also in the quality and cooperation projects and networks since 2007, to the EU target that by 2020 at least 20 % of diversity of the mobility activities on offer. Traineeships it has also enabled higher education institutions to all graduates should have spent a period of time abroad were introduced in 2007. Since then, the improve the quality, relevance and accessibility of studying or training abroad. The annual number number of students receiving their first professional their programmes. Out of this total, some 80 projects of Erasmus students accounts for almost 5 % of experience through Erasmus has tripled and more than were funded in 2013-14 and supported higher all graduates, thus contributing to a quarter of the 60 000 students seized this opportunity in 2013-14 education institutions in working together to address benchmark, and cooperation projects can serve as a (22 % of all Erasmus students). Overall, 290 000 the EU higher education priorities. During 2007-2013, catalyst for institutions to include student mobility in students have undertaken an Erasmus traineeship the EU also supported approximately 550 Tempus their curricula. since 2007 in companies, almost 80 % of them cooperation projects, 700 Erasmus Mundus joint Every year, the European Commission compiles being SMEs. One in three were offered a job by their degrees and international mobility projects (since Erasmus statistics from the Erasmus National host and one in ten went on to create their own 2004) and 1 200 Jean Monnet teaching and research Agencies in the participating countries and publishes company, according to the same 2014 study. With projects. a statistical overview online, providing an overall Erasmus+, recent graduates can also receive support These different forms of cooperation have been picture of the different types of actions funded, with to undertake a traineeship abroad as a route into the instrumental in improving key areas, such as the a comparison of a given year’s results with those of labour market. quality and diversity of higher education in terms previous years. Basic data from the other EU higher Higher education teachers and other staff, such as of learning and teaching, the recognition of study education programmes now complement the picture. a university’s international relations officers, can periods abroad and the provision of student support We hope you will find this information useful. also benefit from EU support to teach or be trained services. Among such advances are developments in abroad, and higher education institutions have the institutional management, links with the labour market opportunity to invite staff from companies to come and access to learning environments, which promote and teach at their institutions, a number that grew innovation and creativity. In particular, Erasmus 11-fold over the LLP period. Teachers coming from cooperation projects have led to long-term structural institutions or from businesses in other countries changes and strategic initiatives. These include the allow a wider number of students, including those European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System who cannot go abroad, the chance to be exposed that promotes the transparency and transferability to other teaching practices, other cultures and to of study credits in European higher education, the the labour market in an international setting before ‘tuning’ of academic degree programmes based graduation. All in all, the Erasmus community on learning outcomes and the many joint curricula included over 4 900 higher education institutions developed over the years. ¹ (HEIs) holding the Erasmus University Charter in “The Erasmus Impact Study. Effects of mobility on the skills and employability At a more general level, mobility and cooperation of students and the internationalisation of higher education institutions” 2013-14, of which almost 3 600 were active in projects supported by Erasmus have promoted the http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/study/2014/erasmus-impact_en.pdf sending or receiving students and staff. The number internationalisation of European higher education, of sending HEIs increased by 65 % over the LLP period. 6 | ERASMUS - FACTS, FIGURES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Student Mobility in Western Balkan Countries
    Student mobility in Western Balkan countries Student mobility in Western Balkan countries Research report Milos Besic, Phd. Associate Professor at Faculty of Political Sciences - Podgorica COLOPHON Student mobility in Western Balkan countries Research report A publication of the King Baudouin Foundation Rue Brederode 21, B 1000 Brussels AUTHOR Milos Besic, Phd. Associate Professor at Faculty of Political Sciences - Podgorica COORDINATION Gerrit Rauws Director, King Baudouin Foundation Stefan Schäfers European Programme Advisor, King Baudouin Foundation Michèle Duesberg Assistant, King Baudouin Foundation GRAPHIC CONCEPT PuPiL LAYOUT Jean-Pierre Marsily PRINT ON DEMAND Manufast-ABP, a non-profit, special-employment enterprise This publication can be downloaded free of charge from www.kbs-frb.be A printed version of this electronic publication is available free of charge: order online from www.kbs-frb.be, by e-mail at [email protected] or call King Baudouin Foundations’ Contact Center +32-70-233 728, fax + 32-70-233-727 LEGAL deposit: D/2893/2009/03 ISBN-13: 978-90-5130-638-5 EAN: 9789051306385 ORDER NUMBER: 1866 January 2009 With the support of the Belgian National Lottery FOREWORD The main goal of this survey was to identify the perception, attitudes and experiences of students from Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia regarding studying abroad. In this context the survey explored the motivation and expectations towards studying abroad, the main problems and obstacles, the question how students obtain information as well as potential negative effects of being abroad. Moreover, the survey intended to bring some background information into the debate on student mobility in the Western Balkans and specially the so called isolation of the region: a debate which is often marked by personal experience of few and less on facts and figures.
    [Show full text]
  • VADEMECUM on Sources of Funding for the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 2019
    VADEMECUM ON SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR THE CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2019 VADEMECUM ON SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR THE CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2019 Image credits: © Shutterstock Document prepared by the European Institute of Cultural Routes, September 2019. Please inform the Institute about any updates. Contact: [email protected] Vademecum on Sources of Funding for the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 2019 Foreword ...................................................................................................................................... I Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. III Nature and Structure of the Vademecum ..................................................................................... V EUROPEAN UNION ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to EU Funding .................................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................................... 7 Creative Europe ...................................................................................................................... 7 Europe for Citizens ................................................................................................................. 7 COSME ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching the Northern and Southern Neighbours of the European Union
    Approaching the Northern and Southern Neighbours of the European Union Dacian DUNA Abstract: This paper approaches what may be regarded as two ‘dimensions’ of the EU security and cooperation: the Northern and the Southern. The Northern Dimension is highly institutionalized and it developed a model of partnership and multi-level governance which inspired the European Neighbourhood Policy. At the same time, the process in the Euro- Mediterranean region has been much slower, due to the deeper divisions between the European coastal states and the African or Asian coastal states. The aim of the paper is not to provide a comprehensive analysis of the ENP. It emphasizes the ‘foundational’ moment of 2003 for the new European neighbourhood policy, noticing that much of the challenges and dilemmas have remained intact and still need to be addressed by the EU and its neighbours in their quest for security and identity. Keywords: European Union, neighbourhood, security, strategy, cooperation **** The Assessment of the European Neighbourhood Policy in the South Caucasus: What the European Union can do? Irina POP Abstract : The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) is now the flagship policy of the European Union towards its neighbours. Although the ENP did not include the South Caucasus countries from the beginning, last years brought important changes in this respect. The development of the ENP in the South Caucasus can be understood as the result of the European internal debates, of the institutional corrections made by the European Commission and of the external events’ influence over the Union. The European Neighbourhood Policy still needs further improvements, especially concerning the Eastern neighbours.
    [Show full text]
  • Definition of Erasmus Programme and Partner Countries
    Programme Guide ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES The Erasmus+ Programme is open to the following countries: PROGRAMME COUNTRIES The following countries can fully take part in all the Actions of the Erasmus+ Programme: Member States of the European Union (EU)9 Belgium Greece Lithuania Portugal Bulgaria Spain Luxembourg Romania Czech Republic France Hungary Slovenia Denmark Croatia Malta Slovakia Germany Italy Netherlands Finland Estonia Cyprus Austria Sweden 10 Ireland Latvia Poland United Kingdom Non EU Programme Countries former Yugoslav Iceland Norway Republic of Macedonia Liechtenstein Turkey Serbia11 PARTNER COUNTRIES The following countries can take part in certain Actions of the Programme, subject to specific criteria or conditions (for more information, please consult Part B of this Guide). Funding will be allocated to organisations in the countries within their territories as recognised by international law. Applicants and participants must respect any restrictions placed on EU external assistance imposed by the European Council. Applications have to be in line with the overall EU values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities as foreseen in art 2 of the Treaty of the European Union. 9 According to Article 33.3 of the Council Decision 2013/755/EU* on the Association of the OCTs with the European Union adopted on 25 November 2013 (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:344:0001:0118:EN:PDF), the Union shall ensure that individuals and organisations from or to Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) shall be eligible for the Erasmus+, subject to the rules of the Programme and the arrangements applicable to the Member State with which these OCTs they are connected.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Students, Isolation and the Erasmus Challenge
    Turkish Students, Isolation and the Erasmus Challenge ESI Background Paper 24 July 2014 Ever abroad for education/training (age 15-35, in per cent) Luxembourg 41 Cyprus 39 Norway 28 Austria 28 Sweden 24 Denmark 21 Iceland 21 Finland 21 Germany 21 Estonia 21 Spain 19 Ireland 19 Netherlands 18 Slovenia 18 Hungary 18 Slovakia 16 Belgium 16 Latvia 15 Czech Republic 14 Malta 14 France 14 Lithuania 14 Portugal 13 … Turkey 3 2 Contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 “A life-changing experience” ......................................................................................................... 4 Turkey and Erasmus ....................................................................................................................... 4 The foreign language deficit ........................................................................................................... 9 Something to offer: foreign language degree programmes at Turkish universities ...................... 14 Funding Turkish students abroad .................................................................................................. 14 The student visa problem .............................................................................................................. 18 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 21 Annex: Turkish Erasmus students and the visa
    [Show full text]
  • Erasmus Generations'?
    Edinburgh Research Explorer What Should we Expect of 'Erasmus Generations'? Citation for published version: Wilson, I 2011, 'What Should we Expect of 'Erasmus Generations'?', JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1113-1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02158.x Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02158.x Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies Publisher Rights Statement: © Wilson, I. (2011). What Should we Expect of 'Erasmus Generations'?. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1113-1140. 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02158.x General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 What should we expect of ‘Erasmus generations’? Abstract The Erasmus programme promotes student mobility within the European Union largely on the assumption that mobile students will become more pro-European. This article presents the results of a panel study of Erasmus students which suggest that, while former Erasmus students may be more pro-European than their peers, this is because students who choose to take part are already more pro-European.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Erasmus Programme on the Organizational Learning Capacity and Globalization
    ISSN:2229- 6247 Burak Yıldız et al | International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research(IJBMER), Vol 7(2),2016, 619-631 The Impact of Erasmus Programme on the Organizational Learning Capacity and Globalization Burak Yıldız Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkey İzlem Gözükara Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkey Osman Yıldırım Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkey Abstract Globalization is among the most discussed subjects of research recently because it has both positive and negative impacts on all social structures and organizations. Many people consider globalization as a rescue to be embraced right away, while others have completely opposite thoughts. During globalization, countries struggle with a significant issue to offer an education system which would maintain the cultural and natural values as they provide the essential components of a global world such as acquisition of information, skills, attitudes and behaviors. Such education systems and organizations require a learning capacity in order to survive and success. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine organizational learning capacity and globalization through the mediator role of the Erasmus Programme in higher education institutions. The study data was collected using a survey-based method. SPSS and AMOS software programs were used for data analysis. The results showed that organizational learning capacity has a positive impact on globalization, in which the Erasmus Programme acts as a mediator. Keywords: Organizational learning capacity, globalization, Erasmus, higher education institutions 1. INTRODUCTION The introduction of Internet and social networks with the communication and information technologies has brought great transformations in social, political, economic and cultural life. Defined as the globalization process, such advances have improved people's opportunities to access experiences and information in other parts of the world easily.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Programme Guide
    Erasmus+ Programme Guide In the case of conflicting meanings between language versions, the English version prevails. Version 1 (2021): 25-03-2021 Table of Contents PART A – GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ERASMUS+ PROGRAMME ........................................................ 4 WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES AND IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THE ERASMUS+ PROGRAMME? ..................... 6 PRIORITIES OF THE ERASMUS+ PROGRAMME .................................................................................................. 7 Part B – INFORMATION ABOUT THE ACTIONS COVERED BY THIS GUIDE .......................................................... 36 KEY ACTION 1: LEARNING MOBILITY OF INDIVIDUALS ................................................................................... 38 MOBILITY PROJECT FOR HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS AND STAFF ...................................................... 41 ERASMUS ACCREDITATION IN THE FIELDS OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND ADULT EDUCATION ............................................................................................................................. 68 MOBILITY FOR LEARNERS AND STAFF IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING ............................... 77 MOBILITY FOR PUPILS AND STAFF IN SCHOOL EDUCATION ...................................................................... 93 MOBILITY FOR LEARNERS AND STAFF IN ADULT EDUCATION ................................................................. 106 LEARNING MOBILITY IN THE FIELD OF YOUTH ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Conditions: Erasmus + Scholarship for Study Period Abroad at a Partner Higher Education Institution
    General conditions: Erasmus + scholarship for study period abroad at a partner higher education institution Duration: The student may receive grants for mobility periods totalling up to 360 days maximum per each cycle of study (Bachelor, Master, PhD), independently from the number and type of mobility activities. If for the requested mobility the total amount goes over 360 days, the entire mobility cannot be granted. The study period abroad must take a minimum of 3 months and a maximum of 12 months (360 days, 30 days/month). Prior experience under Erasmus Programme counts towards the 360 days per study cycle. A study period abroad needs to be a full-time study. A study period abroad may include a traineeship period as well. Countries: These are the countries that belong to the Erasmus+ programme (situation 2021): Member States of the European Union (EU) Belgium Greece Lithuania Portugal Bulgaria Spain Luxembourg Romania Czech France Hungary Slovenia Republic Croatia Malta Slovakia Denmark Italy Netherlands* Finland Germany Cyprus Austria Sweden Estonia Latvia Poland Ireland Non EU Programme Countries United Kingdom* North Macedonia Iceland Norway Serbia Liechtenstein Turkey Students of Fontys will not get an Erasmus+ Scholarship if they do their Minor in the Netherlands. The United Kingdom is for study semesters that start in the spring and fall semesters of 2021 and spring 2022 still an eligible country for Erasmus+ Scholarships. The situation from fall 2022 is different. You need to move to another country for the duration of your Study Abroad, regardless of your nationality. For example: a German student, living in Germany, but studying his degree programme in the Netherlands can not receive an Erasmus+ scholarship for Study Abroad in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Rural Women's Perspectives on the Impact of Education Supported Development Projects on Their Lives: Cases from Upper Egypt Governorates
    Running: FINAL THESIS REPORT The American University in Cairo Graduate School of Education YOUNG RURAL WOMEN‘S PERSPECTIVES ON THE IMPACT OF EDUCATION SUPPORTED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ON THEIR LIVES: CASES FROM UPPER EGYPT GOVERNORATES A Thesis Report Submitted to The Department of Comparative and International Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International and Comparative Education by Ola Hosny (under the supervision of Dr. Nagwa Megahed) (Read by Dr. Ted Purinton) 2014 FINAL RESEARCH REPORT ON RURAL’S WOMEN PERSPECTIVES ON DEVELOP. PROJECTS IN UPPER EGYPT ii Abstract Over the last years, young rural women‘s vulnerability to the social and economic conditions became the focus of the literature (El Laithy, na). Current studies show that women‘s capacities to participate in the development processes of their communities have been jammed with unequal gender, socio-economic and power relations (Kabeer, 2012). Yet, many development programs were designed and implemented to reach deprived women from different socio-economic backgrounds, educate or train them, build their capacities and prepare them to join the labor market and be active members inside their communities (USAID, 2013). This research study examines young rural women‘s perspectives in Upper Egypt governorates on the impact of the education supported development projects on their lives, calling for an update of the state of knowledge of the effect of development projects on specific areas such as; women empowerment, gender equity, civil society enhancement and the integration of social stratification in underprivileged communities. The main findings explored in this study revealed the urgent need of placing the following changes inside the intervened communities; establishing social accountability, building social resilience, effecting scaffolding, resolving ideological debates and integrating projects‘ social cohesion inside the villages‘ communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Erasmus Programme Paul Bolton
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8326, 6 January 2021 By Sue Hubble Alex Bellis The Erasmus Programme Paul Bolton Contents: 1. History of the Erasmus Programme 2. Aims of the Erasmus Programme 3. Structure and funding streams 4. UK higher eduction student participation in Erasmus+ 5. Participation compared to other EU countries 6. Erasmus+ post Brexit 7. Parliamentary debate on participation in Erasmus+ 8. A new UK mobility programme 9. European Commission proposal 2021-27 cycle 10. Further reading www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The Erasmus Programme Contents Summary 3 1. History of the Erasmus Programme 5 2. Aims of the Erasmus Programme 7 3. Structure and funding streams 8 4. UK higher eduction student participation in Erasmus+ 10 4.1 Destination of UK students 11 4.2 Participation by disadvantaged students 11 4.3 Funding received by UK students in Erasmus support grants 11 5. Participation compared to other EU countries 12 6. Erasmus+ post Brexit 13 6.1 Erasmus+ participation during the transition period 14 6.2 The UK to leave the Erasmus+ programme 15 7. Parliamentary debate on participation in Erasmus+ 16 7.1 Issues around continued participation in Erasmus+ 17 8. A new UK mobility programme 18 8.1 Government announces the Turing scheme 18 9. European Commission proposal 2021-27 cycle 21 10. Further reading 22 Cover page image copyright Flagging support by Dave Kellam. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 6 January 2021 Summary The Erasmus+ scheme provides funding for education, training and sport, with a particular focus on youth work, but it also provides funding for activities aimed at all ages.
    [Show full text]
  • WP 6 3 Final
    EUROSPHERE COMPARATIVE STUDIES Work Package 6.3 Report, 2011 Assessing Transnational Spaces Karin Creutz-Kämppi Peter Holley Peter A. Kraus Petri Laine Johanna Warius This paper can be downloaded without charge from: http://eurospheres.org/publications/workpackage-reports/ ISSN 1890-5986 EUROSPHERE ONLINE WORKING PAPER SERIES Title: WP6.3 – Assessing Transnational Spaces Authors: K. Creutz-Kämppi, P. Holley P. A. Kraus P. Laine J. Warius This version: October 2011 Webpage: http://eurospheres.org/publications/workpackage-reports/ © EUROSPHERE, 2011 http://eurospheres.org © 2011 by authors All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including notice, is given to the source. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the EUROSPHERE Project. The statement of purpose for the EUROSPHERE Online Working Paper Series is available from the EUROSPHERE working papers website, http://eurospheres.org/publications/workpackage-reports/ Author Contact Information: Peter A. Kraus University of Helsinki Finland [email protected] ISSN 1890-5986 (online) Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Transnational Spaces: A Conceptual Approximation ............................................................. 2 3 Methodology ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]