Other Alkylating Agents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bevacizumab Plus Fotemustine As First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Melanoma Patients: Clinical Activity and Modulation of Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis Factors
Published OnlineFirst October 28, 2010; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2363 Clinical Cancer Cancer Therapy: Clinical Research Bevacizumab plus Fotemustine as First-line Treatment in Metastatic Melanoma Patients: Clinical Activity and Modulation of Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis Factors Michele Del Vecchio1, Roberta Mortarini2, Stefania Canova1, Lorenza Di Guardo1, Nicola Pimpinelli3, Mario R. Sertoli4, Davide Bedognetti4, Paola Queirolo5, Paola Morosini6, Tania Perrone7, Emilio Bajetta1, and Andrea Anichini2 Abstract Purpose: To assess the clinical and biological activity of the association of bevacizumab and fotemustine as first-line treatment in advanced melanoma patients. Experimental Design: Previously untreated, metastatic melanoma patients (n ¼ 20) received bevaci- zumab (at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) and fotemustine (100 mg/m2 by intravenous administration on days 1, 8, and 15, repeated after 4 weeks) in a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II study. Primary endpoint was the best overall response rate; other endpoints were toxicity, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Serum cytokines, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis factors were monitored by multiplex arrays and by in vitro angiogenesis assays. Effects of fotemustine on melanoma cells, in vitro, on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C release and apoptosis were assessed by ELISA and flow cytometry, respectively. Results: One complete response, 2 partial responses (PR), and 10 patients with stable disease were observed. TTP and OS were 8.3 and 20.5 months, respectively. Fourteen patients experienced adverse events of toxicity grade 3–4. Serum VEGF-A levels in evaluated patients (n ¼ 15) and overall serum proangiogenic activity were significantly inhibited. A significant reduction in VEGF-C levels was found in several post-versus pretherapy serum samples. -
Synthesis and Antitumor Evaluation of Novel Bis-Triaziquone Derivatives
Molecules 2009, 14, 2306-2316; doi:10.3390/molecules14072306 OPEN ACCESS molecules ISSN 1420-3049 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Article Synthesis and Antitumor Evaluation of Novel Bis-Triaziquone Derivatives Cheng Hua Huang 1,3, Hsien-Shou Kuo 2, Jia-Wen Liu 3 and Yuh-Ling Lin 3,* 1 Cathay General Hospital, 280 Renai Rd. Sec.4, Taipei, Taiwan 2 Department of Biochemistry, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Hsin St. Taipei, Taiwan 3 College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, 510 Chung Cheng Rd., Hsin-Chuang, Taipei Hsien 24205, Taiwan * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-mail: [email protected] Received: 30 April 2009; in revised form: 19 June 2009 / Accepted: 23 June 2009 / Published: 29 June 2009 Abstract: Aziridine-containing compounds have been of interest as anticancer agents since late 1970s. The design, synthesis and study of triaziquone (TZQ) analogues with the aim of obtaining compounds with enhanced efficacy and reduced toxicity are an ongoing research effort in our group. A series of bis-type TZQ derivatives has been prepared and their cytotoxic activities were investigated. The cytotoxicity of these bis-type TZQ derivatives were tested on three cancer lines, including breast cancer (BC-M1), oral cancer (OEC-M1), larynx epidermal cancer (Hep2) and one normal skin fibroblast (SF). Most of these synthetic derivatives displayed significant cytotoxic activities against human carcinoma cell lines, but weak activities against SF. Among tested analogues the bis-type TZQ derivative 1a showed lethal effects on larynx epidermal carcinoma cells (Hep2), with an LC50 value of 2.02 M, and also weak cytotoxic activity against SF cells with an LC50 value over 10 M for 24 hr treatment. -
California Proposition 65 Toxicity List
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT SAFE DRINKING WATER AND TOXIC ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 1986 CHEMICALS KNOWN TO THE STATE TO CAUSE CANCER OR REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY 4-Mar-05 The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 requires that the Governor revise and Chemical Type of Toxicity CAS No. Date Listed A-alpha-C (2-Amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole) cancer 26148685 1-Jan-90 Acetaldehyde cancer 75070 1-Apr-88 Acetamide cancer 60355 1-Jan-90 Acetazolamide developmental 59665 20-Aug-99 Acetochlor cancer 34256821 1-Jan-89 Acetohydroxamic acid developmental 546883 1-Apr-90 2-Acetylaminofluorene cancer 53963 1-Jul-87 Acifluorfen cancer 62476599 1-Jan-90 Acrylamide cancer 79061 1-Jan-90 Acrylonitrile cancer 107131 1-Jul-87 Actinomycin D cancer 50760 1-Oct-89 Actinomycin D developmental 50760 1-Oct-92 Adriamycin (Doxorubicin hydrochloride) cancer 23214928 1-Jul-87 AF-2;[2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)]acrylamide cancer 3688537 1-Jul-87 Aflatoxins cancer --- 1-Jan-88 Alachlor cancer 15972608 1-Jan-89 Alcoholic beverages, when associated with alcohol abuse cancer --- 1-Jul-88 Aldrin cancer 309002 1-Jul-88 All-trans retinoic acid developmental 302794 1-Jan-89 Allyl chloride Delisted October 29, 1999 cancer 107051 1-Jan-90 Alprazolam developmental 28981977 1-Jul-90 Altretamine developmental, male 645056 20-Aug-99 Amantadine hydrochloride developmental 665667 27-Feb-01 Amikacin sulfate developmental 39831555 1-Jul-90 2-Aminoanthraquinone cancer 117793 1-Oct-89 p -Aminoazobenzene cancer -
The Chemotherapy of Malignant Disease -Practical and Experimental Considerations
Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.41.475.268 on 1 May 1965. Downloaded from POSTGRAD. MED. J. (1965), 41,268 THE CHEMOTHERAPY OF MALIGNANT DISEASE -PRACTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS JOHN MATTHIAS, M.D., M.R.C.P., F.F.A., R.C.S. Physician, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, S.W.3. THE TERM chemotherapy was introduced by positively charged alkyl (CH2) radicles of Ehrlich to describe the specific and effective the agent. treatment of infectious disease by chemical (a) The nitrogen mustards: mustine (HN2 substances. It is currently also applied to the 'nitrogen mustard', mechlorethamine, treatment of malignant disease. Unfortunately mustargen), trimustine (Trillekamin no aspect of tumour metabolism has been HN3), chlorambucil (Leukeran, phenyl discovered which has allowed the development butyric mustard), melphalan (Alkeran, of drugs capable of acting specifically upon the phenyl alanine mustard), uramustine malignant cell, so that cytotoxic drugs also (Uracil mustard), cyclophosphamide affect normal cells to a greater or lesser degree. (Endoxan or Cytoxan), mannomustine The most susceptible or sensitive of the normal (DegranoO). tissues are those with the highest rates of cell (b) The ethylenamines: tretamine (trie- turnover and include the haemopoietic and thanomelamine, triethylene melamine, lympho-reticular tissues, the gastro-intestinal TEM), thiotepa (triethylene thiopho- the the testis and the hair epithelium, ovary, sphoramide), triaziquone (Trenimon).by copyright. follicles. (c) The epoxides: triethyleneglycoldigly- Cancer chemotherapy may be said to encom- cidyl ether (Epodyl). pass all treatments of a chemical nature (d) The sulphonic acid esters: busulphan administered to patients with the purpose of (Myleran), mannitol myleran. restricting tumour growth or destroying tumour 2. -
Australian Public Assessment Report for Aminolevulinic Acid Hcl
Australian Public Assessment Report for Aminolevulinic acid HCl Proprietary Product Name: Gliolan Sponsor: Specialised Therapeutics Australia Pty Ltd March 2014 Therapeutic Goods Administration About the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) · The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is part of the Australian Government Department of Health, and is responsible for regulating medicines and medical devices. · The TGA administers the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act), applying a risk management approach designed to ensure therapeutic goods supplied in Australia meet acceptable standards of quality, safety and efficacy (performance), when necessary. · The work of the TGA is based on applying scientific and clinical expertise to decision- making, to ensure that the benefits to consumers outweigh any risks associated with the use of medicines and medical devices. · The TGA relies on the public, healthcare professionals and industry to report problems with medicines or medical devices. TGA investigates reports received by it to determine any necessary regulatory action. · To report a problem with a medicine or medical device, please see the information on the TGA website < http://www.tga.gov.au>. About AusPARs · An Australian Public Assessment Record (AusPAR) provides information about the evaluation of a prescription medicine and the considerations that led the TGA to approve or not approve a prescription medicine submission. · AusPARs are prepared and published by the TGA. · An AusPAR is prepared for submissions that relate to new chemical entities, generic medicines, major variations, and extensions of indications. · An AusPAR is a static document, in that it will provide information that relates to a submission at a particular point in time. · A new AusPAR will be developed to reflect changes to indications and/or major variations to a prescription medicine subject to evaluation by the TGA. -
Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017
Q UO N T FA R U T A F E BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 BR 111 / 2017 The Minister responsible for health, in exercise of the power conferred by section 48A(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979, makes the following Order: Citation 1 This Order may be cited as the Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017. Repeals and replaces the Third and Fourth Schedule of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 2 The Third and Fourth Schedules to the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 are repealed and replaced with— “THIRD SCHEDULE (Sections 25(6); 27(1))) DRUGS OBTAINABLE ONLY ON PRESCRIPTION EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED IN THE FOURTH SCHEDULE (PART I AND PART II) Note: The following annotations used in this Schedule have the following meanings: md (maximum dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered at any one time. 1 PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 mdd (maximum daily dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance that is contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered in any period of 24 hours. mg milligram ms (maximum strength) i.e. either or, if so specified, both of the following: (a) the maximum quantity of the substance by weight or volume that is contained in the dosage unit of a medicinal product; or (b) the maximum percentage of the substance contained in a medicinal product calculated in terms of w/w, w/v, v/w, or v/v, as appropriate. -
BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021
Page 1 of 65 BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021 DEFINITIONS Class I Reimbursed for active cancer or approved treatment or approved indication only. Reimbursed for approved indications only. Completion of the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Application (formerly Undesignated Indication Form) is necessary to Restricted Funding (R) provide the appropriate clinical information for each patient. NOTES 1. BC Cancer will reimburse, to the Communities Oncology Network hospital pharmacy, the actual acquisition cost of a Benefit Drug, up to the maximum price as determined by BC Cancer, based on the current brand and contract price. Please contact the OSCAR Hotline at 1-888-355-0355 if more information is required. 2. Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) code only applicable to Class I drugs where indicated. 3. Intrahepatic use of chemotherapy drugs is not reimbursable unless specified. 4. For queries regarding other indications not specified, please contact the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Office at 604.877.6000 x 6277 or [email protected] DOSAGE TUMOUR PROTOCOL DRUG APPROVED INDICATIONS CLASS NOTES FORM SITE CODES Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer using abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUMCSPABI* R Abiraterone and Prednisone Palliative Therapy for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUPABI R Using Abiraterone and prednisone acitretin capsule Lymphoma reversal of early dysplastic and neoplastic stem changes LYNOS I first-line treatment of epidermal -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,580,267 B2 Pedretti Et Al
US008580267B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,580,267 B2 Pedretti et al. (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 12, 2013 (54) IMMUNOCYTOKINES FORTUMOUR (56) References Cited THERAPY WITH CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTS FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventors: Marta Pedretti, Zurich (CH): Dario WO O2/O59264 8, 2002 WO O3,O93478 11, 2003 Neri, Buchs (CH) WO 2004/OO2528 1, 2004 WO 2006/026020 3, 2006 (73) Assignee: Philogen S.p.A., Siena (IT) WO 2006/050834 5, 2006 WO 2007/128563 11, 2007 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this OTHER PUBLICATIONS patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Paul, William, Fundamental Immunology, 3rd Edition, Raven Press, New York, 1993, pp. 292-295.* (21) Appl. No.: 13/139,655 Vajdos et al., Comprehensive functional maps of the antigen-binding site of an anti-ErbB2 antibody obtained with shotgun scanning 1-1. mutagenesis. J. Mol. Biol. 320:415-428, 2002.* (22) PCT Filed: Dec. 14, 2009 Bartolomei, M., et al. “Combined treatment of glioblastomapatients with locoregional pre-targeted 90Y-biotin radioimmunotherapy and (86). PCT No.: PCT/EP2009/008920 temozolomide.” QJNuclMed Mol Imaging. Sep. 2004:48(3):220-8. S371 (c)(1) Marlind, J., et al. "Antibody-mediated delivery of interleukin-2 to the (2), (4) Date. Jun. 14, 2011 Stroma of breast cancer strongly enhances the potency of chemo s 9 therapy” Clin Cancer Res. Oct. 15, 2008;14(20):6515-24. Brack, S.S., et al. “Tumor-targeting properties of novel antibodies (87) PCT Pub. No.: WO2010/078916 specific to the large isoform oftenascin-C.” Clin Cancer Res. -
Anticancer Alkylating Agents-Part-I.Pdf
Anticancer Agents Medicinal Chemistry III B Pharm Dr. bilal al-jaidi Assistant Professor, Pharmaceutical Medicinal Chemistry Faculty of Pharmacy, Philadelphia University-Jordan Email: [email protected] Learning Outcome At the end of this lesson students will be able to – Outline the current status, causes and treatment strategies of cancer – Explain the mechanism of action, SAR, therapeutic uses and side effects of following classes of anti-cancer agents: • Alkylating Agents QUIZ = 20 Marks • Heavy metal compounds (Metallating Agents) • Anti-metabolite • Antibiotics • Plant Extracts • Topoisomerase inhibitors • Hormones • Combination of chemotherapy with other treatments • Others First Examination= 20 Marks The Status of Cancer • Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for 12.6 million new cases and 7.6 million deaths every year. THIS IS EQUIVALENT TO ONE PERSON, EVERY 5 SECONDS OF EVERYDAY Source: GLOBOCAN 2008 By 2020 the World Health Organisation (WHO) expects this rise to 16 million. Cancer • A new growth of tissue in which multiplication of cells is uncontrolled and progressive (tumour). • Abnormal cells can spread to other parts of the body (metastasise). Cancer Types Cancer types are categorized based on the functions/locations of the cells from which they originate: Carcinoma: a tumor derived from epithelial cells, those cells that line the inner or outer surfaces of our skin and organs (80-90% of all cancer cases reported) Sarcoma: a tumor derived from muscle, bone, cartilage, fat or connective tissues. Leukemia: a cancer derived from white blood cells or their precursors. Lymphoma: a cancer of bone marrow derived cells that affects the lymphatic system. Myelomas: a cancer involving the white blood cells responsible for the production of antibodies (B lymphocytes). -
Maintenance Therapy in Solid Tumors Marie-Anne Smit, MD, MS,1 and John L
Review Maintenance therapy in solid tumors Marie-Anne Smit, MD, MS,1 and John L. Marshall, MD2 1 Department of Internal Medicine, 2 Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC The concept of maintenance therapy has been well studied in hematologic malignancies, and now, an increasing number of clinical trials explore the role of maintenance therapy in solid cancers. Both biological and lower-intensity chemotherapeutic agents are currently being evaluated as maintenance therapy. However, despite the increase in research in this area, there has not been consensus about the definition and timing of maintenance therapy. In this review, we will focus on continuation maintenance therapy and switch maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic solid tumors who have achieved stable disease, partial response, or complete response after first-line treatment. aintenance therapy is the subject of an apeutic agents, such as capecitabine and oral 5- increased interest in cancer research. fluorouracil (5-FU), are currently being evaluated as MIn contrast to conventional chemo- maintenance therapy. therapy that aims to kill as many cancer cells as Despite the increase in research in this area, possible, the goal of treatment with maintenance there is no consensus on the definition and timing therapy is to sustain a stable tumor mass, reduce of maintenance therapy. The term maintenance cancer-related symptoms, and prolong the time to therapy is used in a variety of treatment situations, progression and the related symptoms. A thera- such as prolonged first-line therapy and less- peutic strategy that is explicitly designed to main- intense or different therapy given after first-line tain a stable, tolerable tumor volume could in- therapy. -
Chlormethine Gel for Treating Mycosis Fungoides-Type Cutaneous T- Cell Lymphoma [ID1589]
Chlormethine gel for treating mycosis fungoides-type cutaneous T- cell lymphoma [ID1589] Produced by Aberdeen HTA Group Authors Dwayne Boyers1 Elisabet Jacobsen1 Clare Robertson3 Mari Imamura3 Dolapo Ayansina2 Paul Manson3 Gavin Preston4 Miriam Brazzelli3 1 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK 2 Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, UK 3 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK 4 NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK Correspondence to Miriam Brazzelli, Reader (Research) University of Aberdeen, Health Services Research Unit Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD Email: [email protected] Date completed: 14 April 2020 Version: 2.0 (revised after factual error check) Copyright belongs to University of Aberdeen HTA Group, unless otherwise stated. : Copyright 2020 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. Source of funding: This report was commissioned by the NIHR Systematic Reviews Programme as project number 130927. Declared competing interests of the authors No competing interests to disclose. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Lara Kemp for providing administrative support. Copyright is retained by Recordati Rare Diseases/Helsinn Healthcare SA for Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, and Table 8. Rider on responsibility for report The view expressed in this report are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR HTA Programme. Any errors are the responsibility of the authors. This report should be referenced as follows: Boyers D, Jacobsen E, Robertson C, Imamura M, Ayansina D, Manson P, Preston G, Brazzelli M. Chlormethine gel for treating mycosis fungoides-type cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Aberdeen HTA Group, 2020. -
An Analysis of Toxicity and Response Outcomes from Dose
Brock et al. BMC Cancer (2021) 21:777 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08440-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer Kristian Brock1* ,VictoriaHomer1, Gurjinder Soul2, Claire Potter1,CodyChiuzan3 and Shing Lee3 Abstract Background: The overwhelming majority of dose-escalation clinical trials use methods that seek a maximum tolerable dose, including rule-based methods like the 3+3, and model-based methods like CRM and EWOC. These methods assume that the incidences of efficacy and toxicity always increase as dose is increased. This assumption is widely accepted with cytotoxic therapies. In recent decades, however, the search for novel cancer treatments has broadened, increasingly focusing on inhibitors and antibodies. The rationale that higher doses are always associated with superior efficacy is less clear for these types of therapies. Methods: We extracted dose-level efficacy and toxicity outcomes from 115 manuscripts reporting dose-finding clinical trials in cancer between 2008 and 2014. We analysed the outcomes from each manuscript using flexible non-linear regression models to investigate the evidence supporting the monotonic efficacy and toxicity assumptions. Results: We found that the monotonic toxicity assumption was well-supported across most treatment classes and disease areas. In contrast, we found very little evidence supporting the monotonic efficacy assumption. Conclusions: Our conclusion is that dose-escalation trials routinely use methods whose assumptions are violated by the outcomes observed. As a consequence, dose-finding trials risk recommending unjustifiably high doses that may be harmful to patients. We recommend that trialists consider experimental designs that allow toxicity and efficacy outcomes to jointly determine the doses given to patients and recommended for further study.