DOCSLIB.ORG

A Handbook for Trustees (2020 Edition)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Handbook for Trustees (2020 Edition) A Handbook For Trustees (2020 Edition) Administering a Special Needs Trust TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITION OF TERMS ................4 Pre-paid Burial/Funeral Arrangements .............. 11 Grantor .....................................................4 Tuition, Books, Tutoring ................................ 11 Trustee .....................................................4 Travel and Entertainment ............................. 11 Beneficiary .................................................4 Household Furnishings and Furniture ................ 11 Disability ...................................................4 Television, Computers and Electronics .............. 11 Incapacity ..................................................4 Durable Medical Equipment ........................... 12 Revocable Trust ...........................................5 Care Management ...................................... 12 Irrevocable Trust ..........................................5 Therapy, Medications, Alternative Treatments ..... 12 Social Security Disability Insurance ....................5 Taxes ...................................................... 12 Supplemental Security Income .........................5 Legal, Guardianship and Trustee Fees ............... 12 Medicare ...................................................5 Medicaid ....................................................5 LOANS, CREDIT, DEBIT AND GIFT CARDS .................. 12 THE MOST IMPORTANT DISTINCTION .........................5 TRUST ADMINISTRATION AND ACCOUNTING .............. 12 “Self-Settled” Special Needs Trusts ....................5 Trustee’s Duties ......................................... 13 “Third-party” Special Needs Trusts ....................6 No self-dealing ..................................... 13 The “Sole Benefit” Trust .................................6 Impartiality ......................................... 13 Delegation .......................................... 13 THE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT DISTINCTION ..............6 Investment ......................................... 13 SSDI/Medicare Recipients................................6 Bond ...................................................... 13 SSI/Medicaid Recipients .................................7 Titling Assets ............................................ 14 Veterans’ Benefits ........................................7 Accounting Requirements ............................. 14 Subsidized Housing .......................................7 Reporting to Social Security ........................... 14 Federal Subsidized Housing ........................7 Reporting to Medicaid .................................. 15 Section 8 ..............................................8 Reporting to the Court ................................. 15 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (“TANF”) .8 Modification of Trust ................................... 15 Other Means-Tested Benefits Programs ................8 Wrapping up the Trust .................................. 15 INCOME TAXATION OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS ........... 15 ELIGIBILITY RULES FOR MEANS-TESTED PROGRAMS .......8 “Grantor” Trusts ........................................ 15 Income ......................................................8 Tax ID numbers .................................... 16 Assets ..................................................... 10 Filing tax returns .................................. 16 Deeming .................................................. 10 Non-Grantor Trusts ..................................... 16 Tax ID numbers .................................... 16 “I WANT TO BUY A (PAY FOR) ...” .......................... 10 Filing tax returns .................................. 16 Home, Upkeep and Utilities ........................... 10 Qualified Disability Trust ............................... 16 Clothing .................................................. 11 Seeking Professional Tax Advice ...................... 16 Phone, Cable, and Internet Services ................. 11 Vehicle, Insurance, Maintenance, Gas ............... 11 FOR FURTHER READING ..................................... 17 © Copyright, Special Needs Alliance Administering a Special Needs Trust: A Handbook for Trustees Introduction and Definition of Terms “Special Needs” trusts are complicated and can be hard inheritance, the minor child (through a guardian) or an to understand and administer. They are like other trusts adult child will be the grantor, even though he or she in many respects—the general rules of trust accounting, did not decide to establish the trust or sign any trust law and taxation apply—but unlike more familiar trusts documents. in other respects. The very notion of “more familiar” types of trusts will, for many, be amusing—most people TRUSTEE—the person who manages trust assets and have no particular experience dealing with formal administers the trust provisions. Once again, there may trust arrangements, and special needs trusts are often be two (or more) trustees acting at the same time. The established for the benefit of individuals who would not grantor(s) may also be the trustee(s) in some cases. otherwise expect to have experience with trust concepts. The trustee may be a professional trustee (such as a bank trust department or a lawyer), or may be a family The essential purpose of a special needs trust is usually member or trusted adviser—though it may be difficult to improve the quality of an individual’s life without to qualify a non-professional to serve as trustee. disqualifying him or her from eligibility for public benefits. Therefore, one of the central duties of the BENEFICIARY—the person for whose benefit the trust trustee of a special needs trust is to understand what is established. The beneficiary of a special needs public benefits programs might be available to the trust will usually (but not always) be disabled. While beneficiary and how receipt of income, or provision of a beneficiary may also act as trustee in some types food or shelter, might affect eligibility. of trusts, a special needs trust Because there are numerous programs, beneficiary will almost never be able competing (and sometimes even to act as trustee. conflicting) eligibility rules, and at least The essential purpose of a two different types of special needs special needs trust is usually DISABILITY—for most purposes trusts to contend with, the entire area to improve the quality of involving special needs trusts, is fraught with opportunities to make “disability” refers to the standard mistakes. Because the stakes are often an individual’s life without used to determine eligibility for so high—the public benefits programs disqualifying him or her Social Security Disability Insurance may well be providing all the necessities or Supplemental Security Income of life to the beneficiary—a good from eligibility to receive public benefits. benefits: the inability to perform any understanding of the rules and programs substantial gainful employment. is critically important. Before delving into a detailed discussion INCAPACITY (sometimes of special needs trust principles, it might be useful to Incompetence)—although “incapacity” and define a few terms: “incompetence” are not interchangeable, for our purposes they may both refer to the inability of a GRANTOR (sometimes “Settlor” or “Trustor”)—the person trustee to manage the trust, usually because of mental who establishes the trust and generally the person whose limitations. Incapacity is usually important when assets fund the trust. There might be more than one applied to the trustee (rather than the beneficiary), grantor for a given trust. The tax agency may define the since the trust will ordinarily provide a mechanism term differently than the public benefits agency. Special for transition of power to a successor trustee if needs trusts can make this term more confusing than the original trustee becomes unable to manage the other types of trusts, since the true grantor for some trust. Incapacity of a beneficiary may sometimes be purposes may not be the same as the person signing the important as well. Not every disability will result trust instrument. If, for example, a parent creates a in a finding of incapacity; it is possible for a special trust for the benefit of a child with a disability, and the needs trust beneficiary to be disabled, but not parent’s own money funds the trust, the parent is the mentally incapacitated. Minors are considered to be grantor. In another case, where a parent has established incapacitated as a matter of law. The age of majority a special needs trust to handle settlement proceeds differs slightly from state to state, though it is 18 in all from a personal injury lawsuit or improperly directed but a handful of states. 4 REVOCABLE TRUST—refers to any trust which is, by its program, its continued availability is often the central own terms, revocable and/or amendable, meaning able focus of special needs trust administration. Because to be undone, or changed. Many trusts in common use Medicare covers such a small portion of long-term care today are revocable, but special needs trusts are usually costs, Medicaid eligibility becomes centrally important for irrevocable, meaning permanent or irreversible. many persons with disabilities. IRREVOCABLE TRUST—means any trust which was established as irrevocable (that is, no one reserved The Most Important Distinction the power to revoke the trust) or which has become Two entirely different types of trusts are usually lumped irrevocable (for example,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROUND the BEND TEAM Being Through Our Efforts
    Round the bend Farm A CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE COMMUNITY 1 LETTER FROM THE It’s been an AMAZING monarch year for us here at RTB. We even offered CO-VISIONARIES a monarch class in July Desa & Nia Van Laarhoven and we’ve been hatching & Geoff Kinder some at RTB to increase s fall descends on Round the Bend Farm their odds. (RTB), vivid colors mark the passage of time. Autumn’s return grounds us amid Aeach day’s frenetic news cycles. It reminds us of the deeper cycle that connects us all to the earth and to each other. And yet one news story, from late September, has done the same. More than 7.5 million people came together in cities and villages across the planet to call in unison for an environmentally just and sustainable world. This is a story that speaks to RTB’s mission and purpose and demonstrates the concept of Restorative Community that’s so central to our existence. You can see it in the image that juxtaposed September’s global crowds with the prior year’s solitary Swedish protester. You can hear it in the words spoken by an Indigenous Brazilian teen to 250,000 people lining the streets of New York City. Restorative Community is a force multiplier for our own personal commitments to justice, health and peace. It nurtures and supports us as individuals, unites and strengthens us as a movement and harnesses our differences in service of our common goals. In community, we respect, enjoy and learn from each other. As you page through this year’s annual report, we hope you experience the same! We’re This past year, we continued to expand our inspired and encouraged by what we’ve Restorative Community at RTB, more than accomplished this year and we’re honored to doubling the number of people who visited serve our community in ever new ways.
    [Show full text]
  • 112. Na Na Na 112. Only You Remix 112. Come See Me Remix 12
    112. Na Na Na 112. Only You Remix 112. Come See Me Remix 12 Gauge Dunkie Butt 12 Gauge Dunkie Butt 2 Live Crew Sports Weekend 2nd II None If You Want It 2nd II None Classic 220 2Pac Changes 2Pac All Eyez On Me 2Pac All Eyez On Me 2Pac I Get Around / Keep Ya Head Up 50 Cent Candy Shop 702. Where My Girls At 7L & Esoteric The Soul Purpose A Taste Of Honey A Taste Of Honey A Tribe Called Quest Unreleased & Unleashed Above The Law Untouchable Abyssinians Best Of The Abyssinians Abyssinians Satta Adele 21. Adele 21. Admiral Bailey Punanny ADOR Let It All Hang Out African Brothers Hold Tight (colorido) Afrika Bambaataa Renegades Of Funk Afrika Bambaataa Planet Rock The Album Afrika Bambaataa Planet Rock The Album Agallah You Already Know Aggrolites Rugged Road (vinil colorido) Aggrolites Rugged Road (vinil colorido) Akon Konvicted Akrobatik The EP Akrobatik Absolute Value Al B. Sure Rescue Me Al Green Greatest Hits Al Johnson Back For More Alexander O´Neal Criticize Alicia Keys Fallin Remix Alicia Keys As I Am (vinil colorido) Alicia Keys A Woman´s Worth Alicia Myers You Get The Best From Me Aloe Blacc Good Things Aloe Blacc I Need A Dollar Alpha Blondy Cocody Rock Althea & Donna Uptown Top Ranking (vinil colorido) Alton Ellis Mad Mad Amy Winehouse Back To Black Amy Winehouse Back To Black Amy Winehouse Lioness : The Hidden Treasures Amy Winehouse Lioness : The Hidden Treasures Anita Baker Rapture Arthur Verocai Arthur Verocai Arthur Verocai Arthur Verocai Augustus Pablo King Tubby Meets Rockers Uptown Augustus Pablo In Fine Style Augustus Pablo This Is Augustus Pablo Augustus Pablo Dubbing With The Don Augustus Pablo Skanking Easy AZ Sugar Hill B.G.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota Vs. Minnesota Trust Law Desk Reference Guide
    South Dakota vs. Minnesota Trust Law Desk Reference Guide Advantage South Dakota Minnesota For over 30 years, SD has been Like many states, MN has one of the best places to locate attempted to catch up to SD by a trust. A unique and active implementing the Uniform legislative trust committee, Trust Code. However, the Trust Location (Situs) favorable Legislature and difference is still clear and governor support continues to distinct, and the state does not rank SD as a top tier trust have the stability or support jurisdiction state; as verified by that SD enjoys from the industry leaders. government. In addition to many other taxes, MN taxes its trusts. In 2018, the There is no state personal, Fielding v. Commissioner of corporate, or fiduciary income Revenue decision highlighted tax, as well as no state tax on this major difference, holding State Taxes capital gains, dividends, that a trust set up as a MN trust interest, intangibles, or any may not need to stay a resident other income. This equates to trust for tax purposes for the NO state taxes on trust income. entire length of the trust (depending on circumstances). A Dynasty Trust has unlimited possibilities because there is no Rule Against Perpetuities MN has a Rule Against The Dynasty Trust - Legacy (abolished in 1983). Dynasty Perpetuities. By statute, all Trusts avoid federal estate and non-vested interests must vest Planning for Generations income taxation on trust assets (pass) 21 years after death of an because there is no forced asset individual or 90 years after its distribution and the bonus of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashley Hector, Et Al. V. Bank of New York Mellon, No
    Ashley Hector, et al. v. Bank of New York Mellon, No. 10, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Biran, J. ESTATES AND TRUSTS – TRUSTEES – INDIVIDUAL TRUSTEE LIABLITY – The Court of Appeals held that a tort plaintiff may sue a trustee in its individual capacity for acts or omissions undertaken in the course of trust administration. Although it is well settled that an entity acting in its individual capacity, and the same entity acting as a trustee, are, in law, two distinct persons, a plaintiff may name the entity as a defendant in both capacities in a complaint. As the Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 105 (Am. Law Inst. 2012) explains, although the modern approach concerning trustee liability to third parties allows a plaintiff to assert a claim against a trustee in its representative capacity, a trustee is not insulated from also being sued in an individual capacity. ESTATES AND TRUSTS – TRUSTEES – INDIVIDUAL TRUSTEE LIABLITY – PERSONAL FAULT – The Court of Appeals held that, as a matter of Maryland common law, in order to obtain a judgment against a trustee in its individual capacity for a tort committed in the course of trust administration, a plaintiff must prove that the trustee is personally at fault. The Court determined that the General Assembly did not intentionally omit this standard when it passed the Maryland Trust Act. Principles of equity, as well as the applicable provisions of the Restatement (Third) of Trusts, support the adoption of this standard for individual trustee liability. ESTATES AND TRUSTS – TRUSTEES – INDIVIDUAL TRUSTEE LIABILITY – PERSONAL FAULT – “STATUTE OR ORDINANCE RULE” – The Court of Appeals held that a trustee may be personally at fault if it fails to comply with a duty imposed on it by statute or ordinance.
    [Show full text]
  • Testamentary Trusts
    TESTAMENTARY TRUSTS Trusts that are created pursuant to the terms of a probated Last Will and Testament are commonly referred to as “testamentary trusts.” 1. Applicable Law. The applicable law for these Trusts is the Kansas Probate Code (not the Kansas Trust Code). The authority of the probate court as to testamentary trusts is set forth at K.S.A. 59-103(7), as follows: to supervise the administration of trusts and powers created by wills admitted to probate, and trusts and powers created by written instruments other than by wills in favor of persons subject to conservatorship; to appoint and remove trustees for such trusts, to make all necessary orders relating to such trust estates, to direct and control the official acts of such trustees, and to settle their accounts. K.S.A. 59-103(a) Docket Fee for Trusteeship $69.50 [Rev. Ch. 80, Sec. 17, 2017 Sess. Laws] 2. Obtaining Appointment of Testamentary Trustee. Based upon the statutory grant of Court authority under K.S.A. 59-103(7), it appears necessary for a nominated testamentary trustee to be formally appointed by the Court. As a practical matter, the judicial grant of Letters of Trusteeship may be necessary to obtain delivery of the trust’s share of probate assets, to deal with banks and financial institutions (such as to open accounts), or to later sell assets. It is also appropriate to establish the formal commencement of the new fiduciary relationship and the Trustee’s formal acceptance of the obligation as fiduciary for the newly established testamentary trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST BASICS: TESTAMENTARY
    Chapter 2—Special Needs Trust Basics: testamentary Trusts and Payback Trusts Chapter 2 SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST BASICS: TESTAMENTARY TRUSTS AND PAYBACK TRUSTS MICHAEL J. EDGEL Fitzwater Meyer LLP Portland, Oregon MELANIE E. MARMION Fitzwater Meyer LLP Portland, Oregon Table of Contents I. Introduction . 2–1 II. When to Use a Special Needs Trust . 2–1 A. The World of Government Bene!ts . 2–2 B. The Bene!ts Direct the Process . 2–6 III. Primary Types of Special Needs Trusts . 2–8 A. Third Party Trusts . 2–8 B. First-Party Trusts (a.k.a. “Payback Trusts”) . 2–13 IV. Selected Tax Issues . 2–20 A. Grantor Trust vs. Non-Grantor Trust. 2–20 B. Quali!ed Disability Trusts. 2–21 C. Crummey Powers. 2–22 D. 529 Plans. 2–23 E. Charitable Remainder Trusts. 2–24 F. Retirement Plans. 2–24 V. Drafting Tips . 2–27 A. Drafting Third-Party Special Needs Trusts. 2–27 B. Drafting First-Party Special Needs Trusts. 2–29 C. Other Optional Drafting Provisions Applicable to Both Third-Party and First-Party SNTs. 2–30 Appendixes A. Social Security Administration—Consent for Release of Information Form . 2–31 B. Authorization to Release Con!dential Information . 2–34 C. Distribution Standards in Self-Settled Special Needs Trusts for SSI Recipients . 2–36 D. Basic Third Party Testamentary Special Needs Trust —Sample Form . 2–40 E. First Party Special Needs Trust—Sample Form. 2–44 F. Third Party Inter Vivos (Living) Special Needs Trust—Sample Form . 2–58 The authors wish to acknowledge the following lawyers, whose contributions to the understanding and evolution of Special Needs Trusts in Oregon have been indispensible: Cynthia Barrett, Cinda Conroyd, Penny Davis, Donna Meyer, and Tim Nay.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking Hearing February 07, 2011
    Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Banking, Commerce and Insurance Committee February 07, 2011 [LB387 LB388 LB404 LB434 LB448 LB453 LB454 LB455] The Committee on Banking, Commerce and Insurance met at 1:30 p.m. on Monday, February 7, 2011, in Room 1507 of the State Capitol, Lincoln, Nebraska, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on LB387, LB388, LB404, LB434, LB448, LB453, LB454, and LB455. Senators present: Rich Pahls, Chairperson; Beau McCoy, Vice Chairperson; Mike Gloor; Chris Langemeier; Dave Pankonin; Pete Pirsch; and Dennis Utter. Senators absent: Mark Christensen. [] SENATOR PAHLS: Good afternoon. I want to welcome you to the Banking, Commerce and Insurance Committee hearing. My name is Rich Pahls and I represent District 31 which is actually the Millard of Omaha. The bills will be followed as posted, and I will run through those again in a little bit. And to better facilitate today's meeting, I'd like to have you look at the small, white chart over there. Those are some of the procedures I'd like to have us follow...actually, are pretty simple. And one thing I'm going to ask you to do that may be different in some of the hearings is that we do have some chairs up here that we have reserved. It helps me focus in on how many more people are going to be coming up, and it'll move the hearing along. And just to give you an idea, the other day the opponents, nobody sat up. They all sat in the back, and I just went right past them, so keep me alert.
    [Show full text]
  • Soul Top 1000
    UUR 1: 14 april 9 uur JAAP 1000 Isley Brothers It’s Your Thing 999 Jacksons Enjoy Yourself 998 Eric Benet & Faith Evans Georgy Porgy 997 Delfonics Ready Or Not Here I Come 996 Janet Jackson What Have Your Done For Me Lately 995 Michelle David & The Gospel Sessions Love 994 Temptations Ain’t Too Proud To Beg 993 Alain Clark Blow Me Away 992 Patti Labelle & Michael McDonald On My Own 991 King Floyd Groove Me 990 Bill Withers Soul Shadows UUR 2: 14 april 10 uur NON-STOP 989 Michael Kiwanuka & Tom Misch Money 988 Gloria Jones Tainted Love 987 Toni Braxton He Wasn’t Man Enough 986 John Legend & The Roots Our Generation 985 Sister Sledge All American Girls 984 Jamiroquai Alright 983 Carl Carlton She’s A Bad Mama Jama 982 Sharon Jones & The Dap-Kings Better Things 981 Anita Baker You’re My Everything 980 Jon Batiste I Need You 979 Kool & The Gang Let’s Go Dancing 978 Lizz Wright My Heart 977 Bran van 3000 Astounded 976 Johnnie Taylor What About My Love UUR 3: 14 april 11 uur NON-STOP 975 Des’ree You Gotta Be 974 Craig David Fill Me In 973 Linda Lyndell What A Man 972 Giovanca How Does It Feel 971 Alexander O’ Neal Criticize 970 Marcus King Band Homesick 969 Joss Stone Don’t Cha Wanna Ride 1 968 Candi Staton He Called Me Baby 967 Jamiroquai Seven Days In Sunny June 966 D’Angelo Sugar Daddy 965 Bill Withers In The Name Of Love 964 Michael Kiwanuka One More Night 963 India Arie Can I Walk With You UUR 4: 14 april 12 uur NON-STOP 962 Anthony Hamilton Woo 961 Etta James Tell Mama 960 Erykah Badu Apple Tree 959 Stevie Wonder My Cherie Amour 958 DJ Shadow This Time (I’m Gonna Try It My Way) 957 Alicia Keys A Woman’s Worth 956 Billy Ocean Nights (Feel Like Gettin' Down) 955 Aretha Franklin One Step Ahead 954 Will Smith Men In Black 953 Ray Charles Hallelujah I Love Her So 952 John Legend This Time 951 Blu Cantrell Hit' m Up Style 950 Johnny Pate Shaft In Africa 949 Mary J.
    [Show full text]
  • How Unclaimed Property Laws Impact Funds in Your Preneed Trust
    BY WENDY RUSSELL WIENER We all recognize the benefit of general laws dealing with unclaimed property, which facilitate reuniting people with MISMATCHEDproperty they’ve lost track of – entirely M appropriate when the property is money in a bank account. But the op- eration of those laws on preneed trust funds is not entirely appropriate LAWS and can put trustees and licensees in an HOW UNCLAIMED impossible position. PROPERTY LAWS Let’s start by looking at the only two IMPACT FUNDS ways to fund a preneed contract. The first option is for the consumer to pay IN YOUR PRENEED the funeral home, which must then de- posit some or all of the money into trust. TRUST. The other option is for the consumer to purchase a life insurance policy; the same three circumstances – fulfillment, NOW THAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN IN death benefit payable under that policy cancellation or default. SOME STATES, THEY'VE GONE ABOUT is assigned to the funeral home so that Thus, the trust funds are locked up the firm will receive some or all of the by both law and contract, and they can IT INCORRECTLY, AMENDING ONLY money upon the death of the preneed only be accessed when one of the three GENERAL UNCLAIMED PROPERTY LAWS contract beneficiary. conditions occur. WHILE IGNORING SPECIFIC PRENEED Only one of these funding mecha- Few states include, within their pre- nisms – insurance – is exempt from the need laws, direction to the funeral TRUST LAWS. BY DOING SO, STATES reach of the unclaimed property laws home or trustee on how to handle pre- HAVE LITERALLY ENACTED LAWS THAT in some states.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperfect Gifts As Declarations of Trust: Unapologetic Anomaly Sarajane Love Rutgers University-Camden
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 67 | Issue 2 Article 3 1978 Imperfect Gifts as Declarations of Trust: Unapologetic Anomaly Sarajane Love Rutgers University-Camden Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Estates and Trusts Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Love, Sarajane (1978) "Imperfect Gifts as eD clarations of Trust: Unapologetic Anomaly," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 67 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol67/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPERFECT GIFTS AS DECLARATIONS OF TRUST: AN UNAPOLOGETIC ANOMALY By SARAJANE LovE* One fundamental proposition is that, under a legal system recognizing the individualistic institution of private property and granting to the owner the power to determine his succes- sors in ownership, the general philosophy of the courts should favor giving effect to an intentional exercise of that power.' INTRODUCTION Ethel Yahuda was a widow who wished to give a library of Hebrew manuscripts collected by her and her late husband to the Hebrew University in Israel. She announced her gift at a public luncheon in Israel and upon her return to the United States began to catalogue and crate the collection for shipment to the university. Her intention to go forward with the gift was repeatedly expressed to friends and to the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Trust Code
    D R A F T FOR DISCUSSION ONLY UNIFORM TRUST CODE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS MARCH 10, 2000 INTERIM DRAFT UNIFORM TRUST CODE WITHOUT PREFATORY NOTE AND COMMENTS Copyright © 2000 By NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS The ideas and conclusions set forth in this draft, including the proposed statutory language and any comments or reporter’s notes, have not been passed upon by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws or the Drafting Committee. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Conference and its Commissioners and the Drafting Committee and its Members and Reporters. Proposed statutory language may not be used to ascertain the intent or meaning of any promulgated final statutory proposal. UNIFORM TRUST CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS SECTION 101. SHORT TITLE. ............................................................ 1 SECTION 102. SCOPE. ................................................................... 1 SECTION 103. DEFINITIONS. ............................................................. 1 SECTION 104. DEFAULT AND MANDATORY RULES. ...................................... 4 SECTION 105. QUALIFIED BENEFICIARIES. ............................................... 5 SECTION 106. NOTICE. .................................................................. 5 SECTION 107. COMMON LAW OF TRUSTS. ................................................ 6 SECTION 108. CHOICE OF LAW. .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thumb Nail Sketch of Social Security and Earned Income
    Special Needs Planning Workshop Ft. Meade Presentation February 27, 2018 Franke, Sessions & Beckett LLC 151 West Street, Suite 301 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 410-263-4876 www.fsbestatelaw.com © 2018 © Franke, Sessions & Beckett LLC A Maryland Estates and Trusts Law Firm Franke, Sessions & Beckett LLC 151 West Street, Suite 301 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 410-263-4876 www.fsbestatelaw.com The Law of Estates and Trusts Planning ∙ Administration ∙ Litigation Jack K. Beckett Mr. Beckett received his B.A. from Wittenberg University in 2008; and his J.D. from Washington and Lee University in 2011. He was admitted to the Maryland Bar in 2011 and has practiced in Maryland since 2011. Mr. Beckett served on the law review at Washington and Lee University and was a Burks Scholar Writing Fellow. He served as a law clerk with the Honorable Pamela White in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. He is a member of various local and national bar associations. ARTICLES/PUBLICATIONS BY FRANKE, SESSIONS & BECKETT LLC Lawyers of the firm have published articles on tax and other topics related to their professional interests, including: "Medicaid Planning for Maryland Family Lawyers," MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL, Vol. 49, No. 2 March/April 2016 (Co-Author with Phyllis J. Erlich); "Self-Settled Asset Protection Trusts for Married Couples in Maryland," Steve Leimberg's Asset Protection Planning Newsletter (April 2015); "The Terms of the Trust: Extrinsic Evidence of Settlor Intent" ACTEC JOURNAL, Spring 2014 (Co-author with Anna Katherine Moody); "Benevolent Benefactors Be Aware: Changes in Medicaid Policy Result in Fairer Treatment of Gifts," MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL, Vol.
    [Show full text]