DOCSLIB.ORG

The Influence of Word Frequency and Aging on Lexical Access

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Influence of Word Frequency and Aging on Lexical Access Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Summer 8-15-2015 The nflueI nce of Word Frequency and Aging on Lexical Access Emily Rebecca Cohen-Shikora Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Cohen-Shikora, Emily Rebecca, "The nflueI nce of Word Frequency and Aging on Lexical Access" (2015). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 577. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/577 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Psychology Dissertation Examination Committee: David A. Balota, Chair Janet Duchek Denise Head Brett Hyde Rebecca Treiman The Influence of Word Frequency and Aging on Lexical Access by Emily Cohen-Shikora A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2015 St. Louis, Missouri © 2015, Emily Cohen-Shikora Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... vi Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ viii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Age Differences in Language Processing ...................................................................................... 2 1.2 Methods of Studying Visual Word Recognition............................................................................ 4 1.3 Theories of Visual Word Recognition ........................................................................................... 5 1.4 Prior Work on the Age by Word Frequency Interaction ................................................................ 9 1.5 Inconsistencies and Differences among Studies: Motivation for the Current Dissertation .......... 14 1.6 Item Predictor Variables in the Current Study ............................................................................ 17 1.7 Participant Characteristics ........................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 2: Method ........................................................................................................................ 24 2.1 Participants.................................................................................................................................. 24 2.2 Stimuli......................................................................................................................................... 25 2.3 Procedure .................................................................................................................................... 29 Chapter 3: Results ......................................................................................................................... 31 3.1 Comparison of Different Word Frequency Metrics ..................................................................... 32 3.2 Data Analysis: General Approach ............................................................................................... 36 3.3 Item-Level Analyses ................................................................................................................... 37 3.4 Subject-Level Analyses ............................................................................................................... 43 3.5 Linear Mixed Effects Modeling .................................................................................................. 55 3.6 Task Specificity of Predictor Variables ....................................................................................... 63 3.7 Analyses Split by Animacy ......................................................................................................... 66 Chapter 4: General Discussion...................................................................................................... 69 4.2 What Model Can Account for the Observed Effects?.................................................................. 75 4.3 Limitations of the Current Study ................................................................................................. 77 References ..................................................................................................................................... 83 Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 93 Appendix A: Word Stimuli ............................................................................................................... 93 ii Appendix B: Nonword Stimuli ......................................................................................................... 98 Appendix C. Demographic Questionnaire....................................................................................... 100 iii List of Figures Figure 1: Histogram of participant age ......................................................................................... 24 Figure 2: R2 values for each word frequency metric when entered alone in model ..................... 33 Figure 3: Beta weights for each word frequency metric when entered (one at a time) in full model............................................................................................................................................. 34 Figure 4: Word frequency metrics separately for each task and age group when entered (one at a time) in full model ........................................................................................................................ 35 Figure 5: Item-level beta weights for z-scores .............................................................................. 40 Figure 6: Item-level beta weights for accuracy ............................................................................. 43 Figure 7: Linear and quadratic effects of age on word frequency z-score betas ........................... 47 Figure 8: Relationship between age and word frequency z-score betas in the naming task, controlling for vision..................................................................................................................... 50 Figure 9: Linear and quadratic effects of age on word frequency accuracy betas ........................ 54 Figure 10: Linear mixed effects model interactions when controlling for OSpan ....................... 59 Figure 11: Word frequency × vocabulary interaction ................................................................... 61 Figure 12: Item-level analyses split by animacy status (living versus non-living) ...................... 67 iv List of Tables Table 1: Overall Subject Descriptives and Descriptives Split by Age Group ...............................25 Table 2: Overall Item Predictor Variable Descriptives..................................................................27 Table 3: Correlation Matrix for Item Predictor Variables and Overall Performance ....................28 Table 4: Overall Task Performance ...............................................................................................32 Table 5: Item-Level Results for Z-Scores across Tasks.................................................................37 Table 6: Item-Level Results for Accuracy across Tasks ...............................................................38 Table 7: R2 Values for All Phonological Onsets Combined, Split by Mono- vs. Multisyllabic ... 40 Table 8: Correlation Matrix for Subject Predictor Variables ........................................................ 44 Table 9: Subject-Level Correlations with Word Frequency Betas ............................................... 46 Table 10: Subject-Level Partial Correlations between Age and Word Frequency Betas ............. 49 Table 11: Subject-Level Correlations with Other Predictor Variable Betas, Z-scores ................. 51 Table 12: Linear Mixed Effects Model Betas for RT and Accuracy ............................................ 57 Table 13: Inter-Task Correlations by Variable ............................................................................. 64 Table 14: Inter-Task Correlations by Variable, Partialled by Age .............................................. 65 v Acknowledgments Endless thanks to my committee members, Dave, Jan, Becky, Denise, and Brett, for embarking on this journey with me. It has been the most empowering and instructive experience of graduate school. A special thanks goes to my core committee, Dave, Jan, and Becky, and to my other academic mentors,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dirixduyck2017bis.Pdf
    Journal of Memory and Language 97 (2017) 103–120 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Memory and Language journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jml The first- and second-language age of acquisition effect in first- and second-language book reading ⇑ Nicolas Dirix , Wouter Duyck Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium article info abstract Article history: The age of acquisition (AoA) effect in first/monolingual language processing has received much attention Received 3 August 2016 in psycholinguistic research. However, AoA effects in second language processing were only investigated Revision received 14 July 2017 rarely. In the current study, we investigated first (L1) and second language (L2) AoA effects in a combined eye tracking and mega study approach. We analyzed data of a corpus of eye movements to assess the time course of AoA effects on bilingual reading. We found an effect of L2 AoA in both early and late mea- Keywords: sures of L2 reading: fixation times were faster for words that were learned earlier in L2. This suggests that Age of acquisition the L2 AoA effect has an influence throughout the entire L2 reading process, analogous to the L1 AoA Bilingualism effect. However, we are also the first to find an early effect of L1 AoA on L2 processing: if the L1 transla- Eye tracking Visual word recognition tion of the L2 word was learned earlier, the L2 word was also read faster. We discuss the implications of Corpus study these findings for two important hypotheses that offer an explanation for the AoA effect: the mapping and semantic hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Word Frequency Effect: Relationship of Lexical Entries Between the Primary and Secondary Language
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 9-21-2018 The Word Frequency Effect: Relationship of Lexical Entries Between the Primary and Secondary Language Nawal Mustafa University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Mustafa, Nawal, "The Word Frequency Effect: Relationship of Lexical Entries Between the Primary and Secondary Language" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 7548. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7548 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. The Word Frequency Effect: Relationship of Lexical Entries Between the Primary and Secondary Language by Nawal Mustafa A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies through the Department of Psychology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts at the University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, Canada 2018 © 2018 Nawal Mustafa The Word Frequency Effect: Relationship of Lexical Entries Between the Primary and Secondary Language by Nawal Mustafa APPROVED BY: ______________________________________________ C.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Brain Stages of Lexical Decision: Behavioral Effects Originate from a Single Neural Decision
    Discovering the Brain Stages of Lexical Decision: Behavioral Effects Originate from a Single Neural Decision Process Hermine S. Berberyan1*, Hedderik van Rijn2, & Jelmer P. Borst1 1 Bernoulli Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands 2 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands * Corresponding author: Hermine S. Berberyan, [email protected] ORCID: Hermine S. Berberyan 0000-0002-3889-5933 Hedderik van Rijn 0000-0002-0461-9850 Jelmer P. Borst 0000-0002-4493-8223 This is a preprint. A peer reviewed publication is Berberyan, H., van Rijn, H., & Borst, J. P. (2021). Discovering the brain stages of lexical decision: Behavioral effects originate from a single neural decision process. Brain and Cognition, 153, 105786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105786 Abstract Lexical decision (LD) – judging whether a sequence of letters constitutes a word – has been widely investigated. In a typical lexical decision task (LDT), participants are asked to respond whether a sequence of letters is an actual word or a nonword. Although behavioral differences between types of words/nonwords have been robustly detected in LDT, there is an ongoing discussion about the exact cognitive processes that underlie the word identification process in this task. To obtain data-driven evidence on the underlying processes, we recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) data and applied a novel machine-learning method, hidden semi-Markov model multivariate pattern analysis (HsMM- MVPA). In the current study, participants performed an LDT in which we varied the frequency of words (high, low frequency) and “wordlikeness” of non-words (pseudowords, random non-words). The results revealed that models with six processing stages accounted best for the data in all conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from a Crowdsourced Lexical Decision
    Running Head: SPANISH LEXICON MEGASTUDY 1 1 2 3 How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision 4 megastudy 5 6 Jose Aguasvivas 1,2* 7 Manuel Carreiras 1,2,3 8 Marc Brysbaert 4 9 Paweł Mandera 4 10 Emmanuel Keuleers 5 11 Jon Andoni Duñabeitia 6,7 12 13 1 BCBL, Basque Center on Brain, Language and Cognition; San Sebastian, Spain 14 2 Universidad del País Vasco/ Euskal Herriko Unibersitatea; San Sebastian, Spain 15 3 Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science; Bilbao, Spain 16 4 Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University; Ghent, Belgium 17 5 Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tillburg University; Tillburg, Netherlands 18 6 Centro de Ciencia Cognitiva (C3), Universidad Nebrija; Madrid, Spain 19 7 Department of Language and Culture, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Education, The Arctic 20 University of Norway; Tromsø, Norway 21 22 *Contact information: Jose Aguasvivas [email protected] 23 Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language; Paseo Mikeletegi 69, 2nd floor; 20009 24 Donostia/San Sebastian – Spain 25 SPANISH LEXICON MEGASTUDY 2 26 Abstract 27 Vocabulary size seems to be affected by multiple factors, including those that belong to 28 the properties of the words themselves and those that relate to the characteristics of the 29 individuals assessing the words. In this study, we present results from a crowdsourced lexical 30 decision megastudy in which more than 150,000 native speakers from around 20 Spanish- 31 speaking countries performed a lexical decision task to 70 target word items selected from a list 32 of about 45,000 Spanish words.
    [Show full text]