Junior Ranger Program, Mississippi National River and Recreation Area
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MILL RUINS PARK RESEARCH STUDY Expansion of The
MILL RUINS PARK RESEARCH STUDY Expansion of the Waterpower Canal (1885) and Rebuilding of Tailrace Canals (1887-1892) Prepared for Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board 3800 Bryant Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409-1029 Prepared by Hess, Roise and Company, Historical Consultants Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Penny A. Petersen Nathan Weaver Olson The Foster House, 100 North First Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 With curriculum program by Dawn Peterson Ann Ericson May 2003 Expansion of the Waterpower Canal (1885) and Rebuilding of Tailrace Canals (1887-1892) The Construction of the Expanded Waterpower Canal and Rebuilding of the Tailrace Canals By the mid-1880s, the increasing number of mills and the demand for waterpower was jeopardizing the availability of that power, particularly as the height and flow of the Mississippi fluctuated from season to season. In 1883, the Minneapolis Mill Company hired William de la Barre as an engineer and agent for the waterpower works. A number of the mills had installed auxiliary steam engines to supplement the waterpower. Meanwhile De la Barre proposed to solve the waterpower problem by increasing the head and fall available. Working on the West Side canal (Minnesota Historical Society) According to Kane, “De la Barre undertook to deepen the canal and lower the tailraces under his jurisdiction, while the millers promised to lower their wheel pits, tailraces, and headraces. Before the year ended, De la Barre had deepened the canal from 14 to 20 feet and lengthened it from 600 to 950 feet. The expansion increased its flowage capacity from 30 to 40 per cent and raised the water level to produce more power by bring water to the lessees’ wheels at a greater head. -
Betty Crocker First Lady of Food
Famous Food Icons Betty Crocker First Lady of Food Alison L. Eldridge, PhD, RD Suzanne C. Goodsell he is recognized by millions from the cookbooks that grace our kitchens and the cake mixes that S have helped us celebrate our lives. To many, Betty Crocker seems as familiar as a friend. We were raised on her recipes and enjoy the convenience of her Helpers, mixes, and frostings even today. Although she never was a real person, this American icon was ‘‘born’’ in 1921 and since then has become synonymous with helpfulness, trustworthiness, and quality in the kitchen. Who would believe Betty Crocker is 85 years old! Betty is Born The idea for Betty Crocker began with a Gold Medal 1955 flour promotion published in the Saturday Evening Post in 1921. Washburn Crosby Company, the forerunner of General Mills, offered consumers a flour sack pin cushion for correctly completing a jigsaw puzzle depicting a milling scene. Surprisingly, 30,000 finished puzzles were returned, along with hundreds of letters asking questions about baking. A savvy in-house advertising director leaped at the opportunity, convincing company leaders to invent a friendly woman to personally reply to each customer inquiry. The name ‘‘Betty’’ was chosen because it sounded friendly and wholesome. ‘‘Crocker’’ was added in honor of a recently retired director, William G. Crocker. To develop the distinctive Betty Crocker signature, an informal contest was held among female employees. The winning entry remains the basis of today’s Betty Crocker signature. Betty Crocker’s name was first used in print advertisements and on letters offering cooking and baking advice and then for company-sponsored regional cooking schools. -
1 in the United States District Court for The
Case 2:06-cv-00003-TJW Document 3 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ) GENERAL MILLS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 2-06CV-003 ) v. ) ) HOM/ADE FOODS SALES, INC., ) JURY ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT General Mills, Inc. (“General Mills”) for its cause of action against Defendant Hom/Ade Foods Sales, Inc., states and alleges as follows: 1. General Mills is a Delaware corporation with its principle place of business at Number One General Mills Boulevard, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant is a Florida corporation with its principle place of business at 4641 Forsyth Street, Bagdad, FL 32530. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant sells, has sold, offers to sell, and has offered to sell its products within this judicial district. 4. This Court has jurisdiction over this Complaint and over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), in that this action arises under the Acts of Congress relating to patents, 35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. 5. Venue is proper in this district under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and 1400(b). 1 MP3 20165512.1 Case 2:06-cv-00003-TJW Document 3 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 4 6. On July 20, 1991, United States Letters Patent No. 5,035,904 (the “’904 Patent”) entitled “Starch-Based Products for Microwave Cooking or Heating” was duly and legally issued to The Pillsbury Company, as assignee of the inventors, Victor T. -
Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway ................................................................................. -
Winter/Spring 2020 Northeast/Southeast Service Area
Activity Guide January - May 2020 Northeast/Southeast Service Area Audubon • Bottineau • Logan • Luxton • Northeast Van Cleve • Waite • Windom Northeast School Release Days: All recreation centers are open noon-9pm: Jan 2-3, Jan 17, Directory Jan 20, Feb 17-18, Mar 27, Mar 30-Apr 3. All recreation centers are closed: Jan 1, May 25. Recreation Centers Building Hours January 1 - June 5 Northeast/Southeast Service Area Audubon Recreation Center Manager 1320 29th Avenue NE, Minneapolis, MN 55418 Monday-Thursday, 3-9 pm 612-370-4910 Friday, 3-6 pm Jerry Peterson [email protected] [email protected] Mitch Waukau 612-499-9306 Bottineau Recreation Center Drop into our Recreation Centers 2000 2nd Street NE, Minneapolis, MN 55418 Monday-Friday, 3-9 pm The Park Board offers drop-in activities or 612-370-4958 Saturday, 9 am-4 pm ActivePass Programs for visitors to [email protected] socialize, have fun on their own schedule. Joe Hazuka Find an activity to suit your style – ping- pong, foosball, games in the gym, board Logan Recreation Center games and much more! Most programs 690 13th Avenue NE, Minneapolis, MN 55413 Monday-Friday, 3-9 pm offered daily, year-round; hours subject to 612-370-4927 Saturday, 9 am-4 pm change. Ask Recreation Center staff about [email protected] drop-in programs offered. Ryan Flanders Recreation Centers Community gathering spaces Luxton Recreation Center 112 Williams Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414 Monday-Friday, 3-9 pm •Computer labs, gyms, craft rooms, 612-370-4925 Saturday, 9 am-4 pm meeting rooms and community kitchens [email protected] Steve Zimmer •Room rental available for meetings, banquets and birthday parties; for more Northeast Recreation Center information see page 4 1530 Johnson St NE, Minneapolis, MN 55413 Monday-Friday, 3-9 pm MPRB Commissioners Saturday, 9 am-4 pm 612-370-4920 City of Minneapolis voters elect nine Sunday, 12-5 pm [email protected] commissioners every four years: one from Heidi Miller each of the six park districts, and three that serve at-large. -
General Mills General Mills
Annual Report 2008 General Mills Continuing Growth Welcome to General Mills Net Sales by U.S. Retail Division U.S. Retail $9.1 billion in total Our U.S. Retail business segment includes the major marketing divisions 22% Big G Cereals listed to the left. We market our products in a variety of domestic retail 22% Meals outlets including traditional grocery stores, natural food chains, mass 19% Pillsbury USA merchandisers and membership stores. This segment accounts for 14% Yoplait 66 percent of total company sales. 13% Snacks 8% Baking Products 2% Small Planet Foods/Other Net Sales by International Region international $2.6 billion in total We market our products in more than 100 countries outside of the 35% Europe United States. Our largest international brands are Häagen-Dazs ice 27% Canada cream, Old El Paso Mexican foods and Nature Valley granola bars. This 23% Asia/Pacifi c business segment accounts for 19 percent of total company sales. 15% Latin America and South Africa Net Sales by Foodservice Bakeries And Foodservice Customer Segment We customize packaging of our retail products and market them to $2.0 billion in total convenience stores and foodservice outlets such as schools, restaurants 46% Bakery Channels and hotels. We sell baking mixes and frozen dough-based products to 45% Distributors/Restaurants supermarket, retail and wholesale bakeries. We also sell branded food 9% Convenience Stores/Vending products to foodservice operators, wholesale distributors and bakeries. This segment accounts for 15 percent of total company sales. Net Sales by Joint Venture Ongoing Joint Ventures (not consolidated) We are partners in several joint ventures. -
Minnesota Statutes 2020, Section 138.662
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020 138.662 138.662 HISTORIC SITES. Subdivision 1. Named. Historic sites established and confirmed as historic sites together with the counties in which they are situated are listed in this section and shall be named as indicated in this section. Subd. 2. Alexander Ramsey House. Alexander Ramsey House; Ramsey County. History: 1965 c 779 s 3; 1967 c 54 s 4; 1971 c 362 s 1; 1973 c 316 s 4; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 3. Birch Coulee Battlefield. Birch Coulee Battlefield; Renville County. History: 1965 c 779 s 5; 1973 c 316 s 9; 1976 c 106 s 2,4; 1984 c 654 art 2 s 112; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 4. [Repealed, 2014 c 174 s 8] Subd. 5. [Repealed, 1996 c 452 s 40] Subd. 6. Camp Coldwater. Camp Coldwater; Hennepin County. History: 1965 c 779 s 7; 1973 c 225 s 1,2; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 7. Charles A. Lindbergh House. Charles A. Lindbergh House; Morrison County. History: 1965 c 779 s 5; 1969 c 956 s 1; 1971 c 688 s 2; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 8. Folsom House. Folsom House; Chisago County. History: 1969 c 894 s 5; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 9. Forest History Center. Forest History Center; Itasca County. History: 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 10. Fort Renville. Fort Renville; Chippewa County. History: 1969 c 894 s 5; 1973 c 225 s 3; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. -
Yoplait® Smooth Style Strawberry Code No.: 70470-15677 Manufacturer: General Mills, Inc Case/Pack/Count/Portion/Size: 4.0 OZ (113 G)
Product Formulation Statement (Product Analysis) for Meat/Meat Alternate (M/MA) Products Product Name: Yoplait® Smooth Style Strawberry Code No.: 70470-15677 Manufacturer: General Mills, Inc Case/Pack/Count/Portion/Size: 4.0 OZ (113 g) I. Meat/Meat Alternate Description of Creditable Ounces per Raw Multiply FBG Yield/ Creditable Ingredients per Portion of Creditable Servings Amount* Food Buying Guide (FBG) Ingredient Per Unit Yogurt 4 X 1/4 1.00 X X 1.00 A. Total Creditable M/MA Amount 1 *Creditable Amount – Multiply ounces per raw portion of creditable ingredient by the FBG Yield Information. II. Alternate Protein Product (APP) If the product contains APP, please fill out the chart below to determine the creditable amount of APP. If APP is used, you must provide documentation as described in Attachment A for each APP used. Description of APP, Ounces Multiply % of Protein Divide by Creditable manufacture’s name, Dry APP As-Is* 18** Amount APP*** and code number Per Portion X X X B. Total Creditable Amount 1 C. TOTAL CREDITABLE AMOUNT (A+B rounded down to nearest ¼ oz) *Percent of Protein As-Is is provided on the attached APP documentation. **18 is the percent of protein when fully hydrated ***Creditable amount of APP equals ounces of Dry APP multiplied by the percent of protein as-is divided by 18. 1Total Creditable Amount must be rounded down to the nearest 0.25oz (1.49 would round down the 1.25 oz meat equivalent). Do not round up. If you are crediting both M/MA and APP, you do not need to round down in box A (Total Creditable M/MA Amount) until after you have added the creditable APP amount from box B to box C. -
MILL RUINS PARK RESEARCH STUDY West Side Waterpower
MILL RUINS PARK RESEARCH STUDY West Side Waterpower Canal Era (1857-1858) Prepared for Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board 3800 Bryant Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409-1029 Prepared by Hess, Roise and Company, Historical Consultants Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Penny A. Petersen Nathan Weaver Olson The Foster House, 100 North First Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 With curriculum program by Dawn Peterson Ann Ericson May 2003 West Side Waterpower Canal Era (1857-1858) The Construction of the West Side Waterpower Canal When construction began on the West Side Waterpower Canal in 1857, Minneapolis, on the west bank of the Mississippi River, had been legally opened to settlement only two years earlier. The village of Saint Anthony on the east bank was a separate entity. While Charles Christmas, under the aegis of John Stevens, had laid out the streets of the new village, only about one hundred buildings had been constructed, and these were scattered close to the riverfront. By 1857 the population was calculated at 2,000, an increase of 1,800 in two years.1 Saint Anthony Falls as seen by the early settlers (Minnesota Historical Society) The leaders of the new municipality knew that future prosperity lay in harnessing the power of Saint Anthony Falls. The most expeditious way to do that was to dig a canal adjacent to the falls on the west bank, divert some of the water from the river and the falls to the canal, then run the water from the canal through turbines connected to main line shafts that could power the adjacent Cataract Flour Mill and nearby sawmills. -
A-Mill Artist Lofts Hydroelectric Project Environmental Assessment
A-MILL ARTIST LOFTS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (FERC No. 14628) MINNEAPOLIS LEASED HOUSING ASSOCIATES IV, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for MINNEAPOLIS LEASED HOUSING ASSOCIATES IV, Limited Partnership Minneapolis, Minnesota Prepared by: HDR ENGINEERING March 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Application ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Action and Need for Power ............................................................................ 2 1.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements .......................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Federal Power Act..................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Clean Water Act ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act ........................................................................................... 4 1.3.4 Coastal Zone Management Act ................................................................................. 5 1.3.5 National Historic Preservation Act ........................................................................... 5 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................................................ 7 2.1 No-action Alternative ...................................................................................................... -
Minneapolis Public Works Department Minneapolis Park & Recreation
NPDES MS4 Phase I Permit No. MN0061018 Annual Report for 2014 Activities City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Co-Permittees Prepared by: Minneapolis Public Works Department in conjunction with Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board July 31, 2015 NPDES MS4 PHASE I PERMIT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2014 ACTIVITIES Acknowledgements Public Works-Surface Water & Sewers Paul Chellsen Lane Christianson Kevin Danen Lois Eberhart Paul Hudalla Kelly Moriarity Matt Stonich Jeremy Strehlo John Studtmann Dick Thornbloom Karl Westermeyer Public Works - Transportation Maintenance & Repair Steve Collin Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Rachael Crabb Michael Perniel Debra Pilger MaryLynn Pulscher Health Department - Environmental Services Tom Frame Patrick Hanlon Regulatory Services Steve Kennedy Source: Minneapolis Public Works – Surface Water and Sewers ii Table of Contents Cover Page ...................................................................................................................................................... Signature Page ............................................................................................................................................... Certification and Resolution 2015R-303…………………………………………………………………... Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... -
Minnesota History: Building a Legacy
January 2019 Minnesota History: Building A Legacy Report to the Governor and the Legislature on Funding for History Programs and Projects Supported by the Legacy Amendment’s Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund Letter from MNHS CEO and Director In July 2018, I was thrilled to take on the role of the Minnesota Historical Society’s executive director and CEO. As a newcomer to the state, over the last six months, I’ve quickly noticed how strongly Minnesotans value their communities and how proud they are to be from Minnesota. The passage of the Clean Water, Land, and Legacy Amendment in 2008 clearly demonstrates this. I’m inspired by the fact that 10 years ago, Minnesotans voted to commit tax dollars to bettering their state for the future, including preserving our historical and cultural heritage. I’m proud that over 10 years, MNHS has been able to oversee a surge of communities engaging with their local history in new ways, thanks to the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund (ACHF). As of December 2018, Minnesotans have invested $51 million in history through nearly 2,500 historical and cultural heritage grants in all 87 counties. These grants allow organizations to preserve and share stories about what makes their communities so unique through projects like oral histories, digitization, and new research. Without this funding, this important history can quickly be lost to time. A great example is the Hotel Sacred Heart—explored in our featured stories section —a 1914 hotel on the National Register of Historic Places that’s sat unused since the 1990s.