Representing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Broadband Mapping Across the Us: Local, State, and Federal Methods & Contradictions #Showmeyourmaps
BROADBAND MAPPING ACROSS THE US: LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL METHODS & CONTRADICTIONS #SHOWMEYOURMAPS MAY 2021 AUTHORS: Francella Ochillo Ryan Johnston Corian Zacher Lukas Pietrzak ABOUT NEXT CENTURY CITIES Next Century Cities (“NCC”) is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization that advocates for fast, affordable, and reliable broadband Internet access across the U.S. We work alongside local officials in communities of all sizes and political stripes to eliminate the digital divide. Communities that have widespread broadband access and adoption are better equipped to help reduce poverty, increase educational opportunities, improve public health, support aging in place, and boost civic engagement. Ensuring that every resident has access to digital opportunities starts with being able to measure the scope of the problem, which depends on accurate broadband data. As NCC has documented in filings and publications, the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC” or “Commission”) maps have long told a different story of broadband access than what residents across the country actually experience. It is widely known that the FCC’s broadband availability data understates the seriousness of, and lacks granularity to adequately address, persistent gaps in connectivity. IMPROVING FEDERAL BROADBAND DATA The FCC’s data perpetually overstates broadband availability and could be improved in a variety of ways. For example, collecting information on latency and pricing, as well as adopting more nuanced methods to determine service availability and validate data submitted by providers, would improve the accuracy and efficacy of its broadband maps. Additionally, improving federal data would support state and local mapping initiatives, which largely rely on the Commission’s data as a baseline. -
Puerto Rico Panic PUERTO RICO | Will the Can Politicians Kicked Down the Street Become a Boomerang?
Puerto Rico panic PUERTO RICO | Will the can politicians kicked down the street become a boomerang? By MARVIN OLASKY SYMPATHY VS. PRECEDENT-SETTING IN THE CARIBBEAN The U.S. territory of Puerto Rico is $72 billion in debt, Gov. Alejandro García Padilla says he has no money to pay the interest due Jan. 1, and liberals and conservatives propose different solutions to the fiscal crisis. The eventual resolution will affect not only 3.5 million Puerto Ricans but 315 million other Americans. Liberals are trumpeting a looming “humanitarian crisis” that demands a federal bailout: Otherwise, Puerto Rico will have to cut spending on schools and hospitals. Conservatives are emphasizing a governance crisis: Many Puerto Rican politicians have won votes by overspending; and if they get away with it, their counterparts in California, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and other states will keep running toward the cliff. One piece of political evidence: New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio flew to Puerto Rico last month and marched with thousands who demanded that Washington send more money to San Juan. Yes, the governor and the mayor have native Puerto Ricans among their constituents, but they were also looking ahead to a time when they or their successors will demand bailouts of their own. As is typical in such protests, politicians said they had to speak up for the sake of the children. Some Puerto Ricans would like to have the island declare bankruptcy, but U.S. states and territories, unlike cities, cannot legally do that. -
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL March 23, 2021 the Honorable Pedro Pierluisi Urrutia Governor of Puerto Rico the Honorable José Luis Dalma
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL March 23, 2021 The Honorable Pedro Pierluisi Urrutia Governor of Puerto Rico The Honorable José Luis Dalmau Santiago President of the Senate of Puerto Rico The Honorable Rafael Hernández Montañez Speaker of the House of Representatives of Puerto Rico Dear Governor Pierluisi Urrutia, President Dalmau Santiago, and Speaker Hernández Montañez: In its letter of March 22, 2021, a copy of which is attached, the Governor of Puerto Rico has requested that the Commonwealth General Fund budget for the current FY 2021 that was certified by the Oversight Board on June 30, 2020 be revised following the provisions established in Section 202 of PROMESA to provide funds from the current General Fund budget to cover the cost of the Congressional Delegation election pursuant to Law 167-2020. For the Oversight Board to certify a revision to the budget, the Government must follow the procedure established under Section 202 of PROMESA. Therefore, pursuant to Section 202(a) of PROMESA, the schedule to certify the revised budget for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is as follows: March 26, 2021 – Pursuant to § 202(c)(1), the Governor submits a proposed revised budget to cover the cost of the Congressional Delegation election pursuant to Law 167-2020; March 29, 2021 – Pursuant to § 202(c)(1)(B), the Oversight Board sends the Governor a notice of violation if it determines that the proposed revised budget is not complaint with the certified Fiscal Plan; Hon. Pedro Pierluisi Urrutia Hon. José Luis Dalmau Santiago Hon. Rafael Hernández Montañez -
~Oficina Del Contralor
=#:: IS-I qj ,..JL ~· :e ·>•" L .. ,·,,I u,., )['' 1 1 o·L .. L ,...,Ll~í~· :l, "'º' 1 ) .. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico :j '.3LP 201'J rnJ:01 ~ Oficina del Contralor Yesmín M. Valdivieso Contra lora August 30, 2019 To tbe Governor of Puerto Rico, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Members of the Legislature, and the People of Puerto Rico: In the exercise of our ministerial duty, we are pleased to enclose the Annual Report of the Office of the Comptroller of Puerto Rico, hereinafter referred to as the OCPR, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2016. The OCPR is responsible forthe accuracy, completeness, and fairness ofthe information and disclosures included in this document. Ali disclosures necessary for a reasonable understanding of the financia! activities have been included. To the best of our knowledge, the information presented herein is accurate. KPMG, our independent auditor, has finally issued an unmodified ("clean") opinion on the OCPR financia( statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2016. The independent auditors' report is located at the front of the financia! section of those reports. These statements, although ready since September, 20 l 5 and October, 20 l 6, respectively, were not issued before as our auditors were waiting for the net pension liability amounts required by the Government Accounting Standards Board in Standard 68. Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follow the independent auditors' reports and provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financia! statements. -
Report on the Activities of the Committee on Natural Resources
1 Union Calendar No. 696 114TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 114–886 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES DURING THE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JANUARY 6, 2015–DECEMBER 18, 2015 SECOND SESSION JANUARY 4, 2016–JANUARY 3, 2017 together with SUPPLEMENTAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS DECEMBER 22, 2016.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate Sep 11 2014 06:35 Jan 06, 2017 Jkt 023127 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR886.XXX HR886 SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES VerDate Sep 11 2014 06:35 Jan 06, 2017 Jkt 023127 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR886.XXX HR886 SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS with DSK4SPTVN1PROD on SSpencer 1 Union Calendar No. 696 114TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 114–886 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES DURING THE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JANUARY 6, 2015–DECEMBER 18, 2015 SECOND SESSION JANUARY 4, 2016–JANUARY 3, 2017 together with SUPPLEMENTAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS DECEMBER 22, 2016.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 23–127 WASHINGTON : 2016 VerDate Sep 11 2014 06:35 Jan 06, 2017 Jkt 023127 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR886.XXX HR886 SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES FULL COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP ROB BISHOP, Utah, Chairman RAU´ L M. -
1 April 5, 2021 Director Rochelle Walensky National Center For
April 5, 2021 Director Rochelle Walensky National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Mailstop F-80 4770 Buford Highway, NE Atlanta, GA, 30341-3717 Dear Director Walenksy: Tourism is an integral part of the economy of fifteen (15) States, Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands where it will act as a major element of our COVID-19 economic recovery. We are writing to you today to request updated guidance that will help cruise lines and ports fully resume operations and open up a dialogue about how we might all work collaboratively and with the relevant federal authorities and other Governors to make it possible for the cruise industry to generate tourism-related dollars in our respective jurisdictions. The tourism industry is an integral part of our economy and within the cruise industry plays a major role. “The 2018 Economic Impact Analysis highlights the incredible impact the cruise industry continues to have on the global economy. In the United States, the cruise industry had an economic impact of over $52.7 billion in total contributions in 2018 and marked a notable increase of over 10% since 2016. Approximately 13 million cruise passengers worldwide embarked from ports in the United States in 2018, and they spent a record $23.96 billion in the United States, which marks a 33% increase since 2010. Additionally, 2018 saw a new peak in the cruise industry’s U.S. expenditures, generating 421,711 jobs across the United States and contributing more than $23.15 billion in wages and salaries, a nearly 13% increase since 2016.” We know the cruise industry is poised to make a comeback. -
Puerto Rico's Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite
Puerto Rico’s Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite: Background and Key Questions Updated June 25, 2013 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R42765 Puerto Rico’s Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite: Background and Key Questions Summary For the first time since 1998, voters in Puerto Rico went to the polls in November 2012 to reconsider the island’s relationship with the federal government (a concept known as “political status”). Voters were asked to answer two questions: (1) whether they wished to maintain Puerto Rico’s current political status; and (2) regardless of the choice in the first question, whether they preferred statehood, independence, or to be a “sovereign free associated state.” According to results certified by the Puerto Rico State Elections Commission, approximately 54.0% of those who cast ballots answered “no” to the first question. In the second question, approximately 61.2% of voters chose statehood. The island’s new governor and territorial legislature contend that the results were “inconclusive.” The plebiscite results are potentially significant if they are interpreted to mark the electorate’s desire to change the island’s present political status. The significance of the plebiscite remains to be seen, however, particularly because in the same election in which voters arguably endorsed a change in the status quo and favored statehood, they also voted out the pro-statehood incumbent governor and former Resident Commissioner, Luis Fortuño, as well as majorities in the territorial legislature believed to be generally supportive of statehood. No change in Puerto Rico’s political status could occur without congressional action. -
Alejandro J. García-Padilla Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Alejandro J. García-Padilla Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Born in Coamo on August 3, 1971. His father, a veteran of World War II, worked his way up, at one point holding down a job as a bulldozer driver, until he retired as the general manager of a manufacturing plant. Alejandro’s mother, a dedicated homemaker, still lives in the same three-room family home where she raised six children through good times and bad. He is married to Wilma Pastrana and is the proud father of two boys, Juan Pablo and Diego Alejandro, and one girl, Ana Patricia. After going through college and law school in Puerto Rico, Alejandro clerked on the Appellate Circuit, served as a legislative aide, directed the Association of General Contractors and practiced law at a well-reputed firm, focusing on contracts and real estate. He also took a teaching job at Inter-American University Law School and was a panelist on a highly-rated AM talk radio show. He went on to serve as Secretary of the Department of Consumer Affairs, where he championed the rights of ordinary Puerto Ricans. His work kept gas prices in check during critical periods of the Iraq War, with the Commonwealth having the lowest prices of any U.S. jurisdiction, despite international turmoil and the higher costs of bringing fuel to an island market. In 2008, Alejandro was elected to the Commonwealth Legislature with the most votes of any senator from either party. During his time at the Capitol, he reached across the aisle to pass important bills providing scholarships for university students, economic development incentives and pension benefits for the widows of police officers killed in action. -
Altering Puerto Rico's Relationship with the United States Through Referendum
Altering Puerto Rico’s Relationship with the United States Through Referendum Legislation conditioning a change in Puerto Rico’s political relationship with the United States on the results of one or more referenda by the Puerto Rican electorate, without subsequent congressional action, would be constitutional, insofar as the referendum or referenda presented voters in the territory with a limited set of options specified in advance by Congress. March 7, 2012 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL In your role as co-chair of the President’s Task Force on Puerto Rico’s Status, you asked us to consider whether “the President [may] support and Congress enact legislation that triggers implementation of whichever status outcome the citizens of Puerto Rico choose with no further action by Congress (with the understanding that such legislation may not be binding on future Congresses).”1 This memorandum memorializes advice we provided to you prior to the release of the Report by the President’s Task Force in March 2011.2 For the reasons given below, we concluded that legislation conditioning a change in Puerto Rico’s political relation- 1 E-mail for Jonathan Cedarbaum, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, from Mala Adiga on behalf of Thomas J. Perrelli, Associate Attorney General, Re: Puerto Rico Questions (June 14, 2010). 2 Report by the President’s Task Force on Puerto Rico’s Status (Mar. 2011), http:// www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/Puerto_Rico_Task_Force_Report.pdf (“2011 Task Force Report”). President Clinton established the President’s Task Force on Puerto Rico’s Status by executive order on December 23, 2000. -
Political Status of Puerto Rico: Options for Congress
Political Status of Puerto Rico: Options for Congress R. Sam Garrett Specialist in American National Government June 7, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32933 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Political Status of Puerto Rico: Options for Congress Summary The United States acquired the islands of Puerto Rico in 1898 after the Spanish-American War. In 1950, Congress enacted legislation (P.L. 81-600) authorizing Puerto Rico to hold a constitutional convention and in 1952, the people of Puerto Rico ratified a constitution establishing a republican form of government for the island. After being approved by Congress and the President in July 1952 and thus given force under federal law (P.L. 82-447), the new constitution went into effect on July 25, 1952. Puerto Rico is subject to congressional jurisdiction under the Territorial Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Over the past century, Congress passed legislation governing Puerto Rico’s relationship with the United States. For example, residents of Puerto Rico hold U.S. citizenship, serve in the military, are subject to federal laws, and are represented in the House of Representatives by a Resident Commissioner elected to a four-year term. Although residents participate in the presidential nominating process, they do not vote in the general election. Puerto Ricans pay federal tax on income derived from sources in the mainland United States, but they pay no federal tax on income earned in Puerto Rico. The Resident Commissioner may vote in committees but is not permitted to vote in, or preside over, either the Committee of the Whole or th the House in the 112 Congress. -
IN the SUPREME COURT of PUERTO RICO Pedro Pierluisi
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO Pedro Pierluisi-Urrutia Petitioner v. State Election Commission; Juan Ernesto Dávila-Rivera, in his capacity as Chair of the SEC; María CT-2020-11 Santiago Rodríguez, in her capacity as Election Commissioner for the New Progressive Party, and Lind O. Merle, in his capacity as Election Commissioner for the Popular Democratic Party Respondents RESOLUTION San Juan, Puerto Rico, August 10, 2020 Having examined the Urgent Petition for Intrajurisdictional Certification filed, the proceedings in the Court of First Instance related to the case of record are hereby stayed until this Court provides otherwise. Furthermore, petitioner is granted until 3:00 p.m. today to show to this Court that the summonses for the Petition for Review on Elections filed with the trial court and notice of this petition have been served on the parties. Respondents are likewise granted until 2:00 p.m. tomorrow, Tuesday, August 11, 2020, to state their position regarding the above-referenced petition for certification. To be notified immediately by telephone and e-mail. It was so agreed by the Court and certified by the Clerk of the Supreme Court. Justice Estrella Martínez agrees with this decision and made the following pronouncement: I agree with the decision to act promptly in the case of record considering that the Judicial Branch has a duty to act diligently in matters of great public interest. This being said, petitioner Pedro Pierluisi focuses his argument on questioning an aspect of the agreement reached by the Special Primaries Commission regarding the tallying of votes, despite that the process has not come to an end in all polling places. -
~Oficina Del Contralor
=#:: IS-I qj ,..JL ~· :e ·>•" L .. ,·,,I u,., )['' 1 1 o·L .. L ,...,Ll~í~· :l, "'º' 1 ) .. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico :j '.3LP 201'J rnJ:01 ~ Oficina del Contralor Yesmín M. Valdivieso Contra lora August 30, 2019 To tbe Governor of Puerto Rico, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Members of the Legislature, and the People of Puerto Rico: In the exercise of our ministerial duty, we are pleased to enclose the Annual Report of the Office of the Comptroller of Puerto Rico, hereinafter referred to as the OCPR, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2016. The OCPR is responsible forthe accuracy, completeness, and fairness ofthe information and disclosures included in this document. Ali disclosures necessary for a reasonable understanding of the financia! activities have been included. To the best of our knowledge, the information presented herein is accurate. KPMG, our independent auditor, has finally issued an unmodified ("clean") opinion on the OCPR financia( statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2016. The independent auditors' report is located at the front of the financia! section of those reports. These statements, although ready since September, 20 l 5 and October, 20 l 6, respectively, were not issued before as our auditors were waiting for the net pension liability amounts required by the Government Accounting Standards Board in Standard 68. Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follow the independent auditors' reports and provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financia! statements.