Sharelatex Example

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sharelatex Example ShadX-New Horizon Presents Project I-MARS: Intelligent Multi-surface Access Reusable Spacecraft May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents 10 Attitude and Orbit Determination and Control Systems 45 List of Figures ii 10.1 Perturbations................ 45 10.2 Attitude Control Methods......... 47 List of Tables iii 10.3 ADCS in Initiation and Assembly Config- uration.................... 50 Acronyms iv 10.4 Breakdown................. 51 10.5 Intelligence and Autonomy........ 53 1 Historical Perspective Leading to I-MARS1 11 Human Habitation, ECLSS and Safety 55 11.1 Habitat Selection.............. 55 2 Mission Definition2 11.2 ECLSS.................... 57 2.1 Requirements Definition..........2 11.3 Service Module Sizing........... 59 3 Executive Summary4 12 Thermal 61 12.1 Thermal Control Systems (TCS)..... 61 4 Fact Sheet6 13 Power 65 5 Mission Overview7 13.1 Power Source................ 65 13.2 Energy Storage............... 66 5.1 Mission Operational Architecture.....7 13.3 EPS Configuration............. 68 5.2 Concept of Operation...........9 14 Structure 69 6 Science of The Moon 13 14.1 Structure Requirements.......... 69 6.1 Main Physical Characteristics of the Moon 13 14.2 Material Selection............. 69 6.2 Environmental Maps Analysis of the Lu- 14.3 Main Frame Design and Analysis..... 70 nar Surface................. 13 14.4 Housing and Meteoroid Shielding..... 71 6.3 Landing Sites Analysis.......... 15 14.5 Landing Legs Structural Analysis..... 71 14.6 A/ODCS Tank Design........... 74 7 Configuration Study & Development 17 15 Telemetry, Tracking and Command 7.1 Ariana Configuration selection...... 18 (TT&C) 75 7.2 Detail Design................ 21 15.1 Driving Requirements........... 75 15.2 TT&C Equipment............. 75 8 Trajectory 28 15.3 Ground Station............... 76 8.1 Trajectory Requirements.......... 28 15.4 DSG Communication Relay........ 76 8.2 Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit of DSG... 28 15.5 Communication Architecture....... 78 8.3 Assembly.................. 28 15.6 Link Budgets................ 79 15.7 Command and Data Handling....... 79 8.4 DSG To The Lunar Surface Transfer... 31 8.5 Descent Phase............... 33 16 Life Cycle & Cost 80 8.6 Ascent Phase................ 36 16.1 Cost Segments............... 81 8.7 ∆V Budget................. 37 16.2 Life Cycle Cost............... 81 16.3 Ariana Lifetime............... 82 9 Propulsion 38 16.4 Schedule................... 83 9.1 Propulsion Overview............ 38 17 Risk Assessment 85 9.2 Propulsion Requirements......... 38 17.1 Anticipated Risks and Mitigation Strategy 85 9.3 Propulsion System Selection........ 38 9.4 Propellant Selection............ 39 18 Appendix 87 9.5 Main Engine................ 41 19 Compliance Matrix 88 9.6 Propellant Mass and Volume....... 42 9.7 On/Off Strategy & Burn Time...... 44 References 92 i List of Tables List of Figures 9.3 Propellant Mass vs. Payload....... 43 9.4 On/Off Strategy.............. 44 5.1 Docking Sequence............. 10 5.2 ConOps Including Rendezvous (Schematic). 12 10.1 Perturbations Magnitude Applied to Ari- ana vs Height from Lunar Surface.... 46 6.1 Topography, Slope, and Roughness of the 10.2 CG Movement vs Fuel Consumption... 47 Lunar Surface................ 13 6.2 Lunar Thermal Map............ 14 10.3 Thruster Configuration (Extra four radial 6.3 High-Priority Landing Sites (with LOLA- thrusters are for assembly phase 10.3.1). 49 shaded topography)............ 16 10.4 Sensor Configuration; Sensor sizes are 10 times more than real size for comfortable 7.1 External-cargo............... 19 viewing; Star Sensors (Blue), Sun Sensors 7.2 Ramp-type LaU............... 19 (Red), LiDAR (Green) ............ 49 7.3 Cargo-mid- propulsion........... 19 10.5 Thrusters Configuration.......... 51 7.4 LaU Rail Mechanism............ 20 10.6 Typical ADCS Logic............ 53 7.5 LaU Strategy of Slide-out Configuration. 20 10.7 Intelligent ADCS Logic.......... 54 7.6 Aligned rails of LaU System........ 20 7.8 LaU Procedure............... 21 11.1 Schematic of M-BEAM........... 57 7.7 LaU Rail Mechanism............ 21 11.2 SM Sizing.................. 59 7.9 View of the Vehicle on the Sloped Surface 21 7.10 Loading and Unloading Mechanisms... 23 12.1 Force Exerted on Cargo by Nozzle Jet.. 63 7.11 Alternative Thrusters........... 24 12.2 Free Diagram of Forces on Cargo..... 63 7.12 Ariana's Ladder............... 24 14.1 Ariana's Main Structure Frame...... 70 8.1 Ariana's Modules Housing into SLS Block 14.2 Simulation Results for the Loading Scenario 71 1B...................... 29 14.3 Landig Legs FEM Analysis........ 72 8.2 Rendezvous ∆V .............. 30 14.4 STA Configuration............. 73 8.3 Round Trip ∆V Contour For Lunar Surface 32 8.4 Simulated Trajectory For Round Trip to 14.5 ATA Configuration............. 73 Moon.................... 32 14.6 A/ODCS Tanks............... 74 8.5 The LLO and Descent Trajectory..... 34 8.6 Ariana Descent Trajectory Schematic... 34 15.1 Side View of NRHO............ 77 8.7 Ariana Descent Trajectory......... 35 15.2 Ariana and DSG Access Window in The Far Side................... 78 8.8 T=WL Trade Study............. 36 8.9 Ariana Ascent Trajectory Schematic... 36 8.10 Altitude vs. Ascent Time......... 37 16.1 Annual US Inflation Rate from 1950 to 2030 80 16.2 Comparison of Estimated Costs at Phases 9.1 Ariana Main Propulsion System...... 38 Calculated by Cost Models........ 82 9.2 Propellant mass needed for the descent 16.3 Timeline of the I-MARS Program..... 84 and ascent phase using LH2/LO2 vs. CH4/LO2 for AMPS............ 41 17.1 Fever Chart of Ariana's Missions..... 85 List of Tables 5.5 Stages Classification.............9 2.1 Requirement Definition..........3 6.1 Physical Properties of the Moon and Earth 13 6.2 Thermal Data of Lunar Surface...... 14 5.1 Overall Configuration Trade Study....7 5.2 Ariana's Design Reqiurements and Con- 6.3 Potential Landing Sites Analysis..... 16 straints...................8 5.3 LEO & DSG Assembly Strategy Trade 7.1 Requirement Effect on Configuration Design 17 Study....................8 7.2 Configuration Trade Study Chart..... 18 5.4 ∆V Budget for LEO to NRHO Transfer.9 7.3 Docking between Modules......... 22 ii List of Tables 8.1 The Operational Requirements of RFP.. 28 11.6 Consumables Mass and Volume...... 59 8.2 Main Parameters of Simulated NRHO.. 28 11.7 SM Components Specifications...... 60 8.3 Launch Vehicle Selection Requirements.. 28 8.4 Launch Vehicles with The Ability of 12.1 Typical Thermal Requirements for Com- Translunar Injection............ 29 ponents................... 61 8.5 Required ∆V s For Phasing Maneuvers.. 30 12.2 Summary of Thermal Control Systems 8.6 Docking ∆V Budget............ 31 properties.................. 64 8.7 Crew/Cargo Mode Objectives....... 31 8.8 Crew Mode Transfer Timeline....... 33 13.1 Power Budget................ 65 8.9 Cargo Mode Transfer Timeline...... 33 13.2 Power Source Comparision......... 66 8.10 ∆V Budget................. 37 13.3 Power Source Trade Study......... 66 13.4 Solar Panel Charactristics......... 67 9.1 Propulsion Subsystem Level Requirements 38 13.5 Secondary Power Comparision....... 67 9.2 Propellant Trade Study Evaluation.... 40 13.6 Energy Storage Mass Breakdown..... 68 9.3 Liquid Hydrogen vs. Liquid Methane... 40 9.4 Main Engine Requirements........ 41 14.1 Structure Subsystem Level Requirements 69 9.5 5-Engine Configuration Pros and Cons.. 42 14.2 Characteristics of The Metal Alloys and 9.6 The RL10 CECE Specifications (Base De- Composite Materials............ 69 monestrator)................ 42 14.3 Common Metal Alloys Mechanical Prop- 9.7 Propellant Mass & Volume & Engines' erties..................... 70 Burn Time Specifications......... 43 14.4 Block 1B PPL/CPL Combined Load Factors 71 14.5 Maximum Needed Propellant Volume.. 72 10.1 List of Mission Requirements....... 45 14.6 Comparison of ATA and STA Occupied 10.2 List of Internal Perturbations and Their Height.................... 73 Effects.................... 46 14.7 Properties of IM7 CFRC.......... 73 10.3 Attitude Control Methods and Their Ca- 14.8 Comparison Between CFRC and Al Alloys pabilities................... 47 Tank Mass................. 74 10.4 Comparison Between ADCS Actuators.. 48 14.9 Propellant Mass & Volume Specifications 74 10.5 Proper Thrusters and Performance Char- acteristics.................. 48 15.1 TT & C Requirements........... 75 10.6 Typical ADCS Sensors........... 48 15.2 TT&C Components and Their Masses and 10.7 List of Sun Sensors............. 49 Power Budget................ 76 10.8 List of Star Sensors............. 50 15.3 Ground Station and DSG Communication 77 10.9 List of Inertial Measurement Units.... 50 15.4 HGA Link Analysis............. 79 10.10Characteristics of the Chosen Thruster for 15.5 C&DH Components and Their Masses Habitat Module............... 51 and Power Budget............. 79 10.11SM Sensors................. 51 10.12Maneuvers Breakdown for Assembled Ve- 16.1 Cost Requirements on RFP........ 80 hicle..................... 52 16.2 Total Cost Breakdown of I-MARS Pro- 10.13Maneuvers Breakdown for SM....... 52 gram.................... 81 10.14Mass Breakdown of the ADCS Parts... 52 16.3 Lifetime Estimation of Each Component. 83 11.1 Habitat Trade Study............ 56 17.2 Ejection Specification........... 85 11.2 Characteristics of BEAM and Expected 17.1 Ariana's Risk and Mitigation....... 86 M-BEAM.................. 56 11.3 Habitats More Information........ 57 18.1 Power Budget................ 87 11.4 Input Parameters to SCALISS...... 58 18.2 Dry Mass Budget.............. 87 11.5 Input Parameters to ALiSSE......
Recommended publications
  • Argus Nefte Transport
    Argus Nefte Transport Oil transportation logistics in the former Soviet Union Volume XVI, 5, May 2017 Primorsk loads first 100,000t diesel cargo Russia’s main outlet for 10ppm diesel exports, the Baltic port of Primorsk, shipped a 100,000t cargo for the first time this month. The diesel was loaded on 4 May on the 113,300t Dong-A Thetis, owned by the South Korean shipping company Dong-A Tanker. The 100,000t cargo of Rosneft product was sold to trading company Vitol for delivery to the Amsterdam-Rotter- dam-Antwerp region, a market participant says. The Dong-A Thetis was loaded at Russian pipeline crude exports berth 3 or 4 — which can handle crude and diesel following a recent upgrade, and mn b/d can accommodate 90,000-150,000t vessels with 15.5m draught. 6.0 Transit crude Russian crude It remains unclear whether larger loadings at Primorsk will become a regular 5.0 occurrence. “Smaller 50,000-60,000t cargoes are more popular and the terminal 4.0 does not always have the opportunity to stockpile larger quantities of diesel for 3.0 export,” a source familiar with operations at the outlet says. But the loading is significant considering the planned 10mn t/yr capacity 2.0 addition to the 15mn t/yr Sever diesel pipeline by 2018. Expansion to 25mn t/yr 1.0 will enable Transneft to divert more diesel to its pipeline system from ports in 0.0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr the Baltic states, in particular from the pipeline to the Latvian port of Ventspils.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Military Studies Office
    community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/fmso/ PENDING PUBLIC RELEASE/APPROVAL - QUESTIONS: 757-501-6236 Foreign Military Studies Office Volume 9 Issue #10 OEWATCH October 2019 FOREIGN NEWS & PERSPECTIVES OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EURASIA 28 New Chinese Aircraft Carrier to Carry 50 Percent More 3 Sinking the Armata? Fighters AFRICA 4 Where is Strelkov Aiming? 30 China and Kazakhstan Upgrade Ties 59 Urban Deployment Reveals South African Military Deficiencies 5 Northern and Eastern Military Districts Get S-300V4 Air 32 China and Russia Sign Heavy Helicopter Deal 60 South Africa’s Xenophobic Violence: Foreigners as Scapegoats Defense Systems 34 China Reports the Launch of Unmanned ‘Mini-Aegis-Class for Failing Economy 7 Russian Ground Forces’ Air Defense: A Look At Russia’s Destroyer’ 61 Somalia’s Newest Military Commander Also Its Youngest Threat-Based Military 35 Contrasting Chinese and Foreign Media Accounts on 62 African Union Raises Concerns Over Foreign Military Bases in 8 The Modernization of Russian Coastal Defense Missiles Xinjiang Africa 10 Mines Seen as Key Capabilities for Russian Naval and Coastal 37 Papuans Hope for Independence, but is it Possible? 63 Regional Rivalries Heat Up as AMISOM Leaves Somalia Defense 39 Another Counter-Terrorism Operation in Palu, Indonesia 64 China’s Investment in African Aviation 12 Russia Developing On-Orbit Fueling Technologies 40 India to Create New Chief of Defence Staff Position 65 International Connections to Guinea-Bissau Drug Trafficking 13 Public Protests and “Hybrid War” 66 Borno Governor
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    Online Annual Report Gazprom Neft Performance review Sustainable 2020 at a glance 62 Resource base and production development CONTENTS 81 Refining and manufacturing 4 Geographical footprint 94 Sales of oil and petroleum products 230 Sustainable development 6 Gazprom Neft at a glance 114 Financial performance 234 Health, safety and environment (HSE) 8 Gazprom Neft’s investment case 241 Environmental safety 10 2020 highlights 250 HR Management 12 Letter from the Chairman of the Board of Directors 254 Social policy Technological Strategic report development Appendices 264 Consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2020, with the 16 Letter from the Chairman of the Management Board 122 Innovation management independent auditor’s report About the Report 18 Market overview 131 2020 highlights and key projects 355 Company history This Report by Public Joint Stock Company Gazprom Neft (“Gazprom 28 2020 challenges 135 Import substitution 367 Structure of the Gazprom Neft Group Neft PJSC”, the “company”) for 2020 includes the results of operational activities of Gazprom Neft PJSC and its subsidiaries, 34 2030 Strategy 370 Information on energy consumption at Gazprom collectively referred to as the Gazprom Neft Group (the “Group”). 38 Business model Neft Gazprom Neft PJSC is the parent company of the Group and provides consolidated information on the operational and financial 42 Company transformation 371 Excerpts from management’s discussion and performance of the Group’s key assets for this Annual Report. The analysis of financial condition and results of list of subsidiaries covered in this Report and Gazprom Neft PJSC’s 44 Digital transformation operations interest in their capital are disclosed in notes to the consolidated Governance system IFRS financial statements for 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Johannes Rohr Report 18 IWGIA – 2014 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Copyright: IWGIA Author: Johannes Rohr Editor: Diana Vinding and Kathrin Wessendorf Proofreading: Elaine Bolton Cover design and layout: Jorge Monrás Cover photo: Sakhalin: Indigenous ceremony opposite to oil facilities. Photographer: Wolfgang Blümel Prepress and print: Electronic copy only Hurridocs Cip data Title: IWGIA Report 18: Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation Author: Johannes Rohr Editor: Diana Vinding and Kathrin Wessendorf Number of pages: 69 ISBN: 978-87-92786-49-4 Language: English Index: 1. Indigenous peoples – 2. Human rights Geographical area: Russian Federation Date of publication: 2014 INTERNATIONAL WORK GROUP FOR INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS Classensgade 11 E, DK 2100 - Copenhagen, Denmark Tel: (45) 35 27 05 00 - Fax: (45) 35 27 05 07 E-mail: [email protected] - Web: www.iwgia.org This report has been prepared and published with the financial support of the Foreign Ministry of Denmark through its Neighbourhood programme. CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1 The indigenous peoples of the north ................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Matters of definition .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 4 October-December 2019 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 6 ESA Ministerial Council Space19+ concludes with biggest ever financial contribution ...................... 6 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 7 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 7 European GSA and World Geospatial Industry Council sign agreement ..................................... 7 Ariane 6 on track for first launch in 2020 ....................................................................... 7 World’s first space debris removal mission commissioned by ESA ........................................... 7 ESA signs contract for new version of EGNOS system .......................................................... 7 Initial tests completed for Europe’s next generation weather forecasting system ....................... 8 ESA and Luxembourg Space Agency sign Memorandum of Cooperation ..................................... 8 CNES signs agreement with ESA on interoperability of mission control centres ........................... 8 Declaration of Intent signed between France and USA on SSA and STM .................................... 8 Construction of Scottish Spaceport reported to begin within next year .................................... 8 German Aerospace Centre signs
    [Show full text]
  • Trade-Off Study, Review and Anatomical Study of Launch Vehicles in Use and Under-Development
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-977 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Trade-off Study, Review and Anatomical Study of Launch Vehicles in use and under-development Priyank Jain1, Samridh Patial2, Poonam Rawat3 1University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India, Email I.D.- [email protected] 2University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India, Email I.D.- [email protected] 3University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India, Email I.D.- [email protected] Abstract This paper provides trade-off study, review and anatomical study of launch vehicles presently in use and under development by various government space organisation and aerospace corporation. The launch vehicles are categorized on the basis of consideration parameters they are being used for. The launch systems are categorized on the basis of usage i.e. expendable or reusable, launch platform, payload weight parameter, and flight regime. Launch vehicle vary depending on the type of launch assistance i.e. launch platform they require for example land-based such as Spaceport in Sierra County, water- based such as mobile-platform and air-based launchers such as Virgin Galactic’s Launcher One. 1. Introduction Launch Vehicle refers to the transport system that is used to carry payload from earth’s surface to orbit, outer space, or interplanetary transfer. In concept, rockets are simple machines that follow Newton’s third law of motion that for every action there is equal and opposite reaction, rocket propels mass in one direction and moves in the other. But such was the case of beginning of the space era, modern launch vehicle system are very complex and critically tuned systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 5 January-March 2020 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 1 The COVID-19 pandemic crisis: the point of view of space ...................................................... 1 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 3 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 3 Lift-off for ESA Sun-exploring spacecraft ....................................................................... 3 ESA priorities for 2020 ............................................................................................. 3 ExoMars 2022 ........................................................................................................ 3 Airbus’ Bartolomeo Platform headed toward the ISS .......................................................... 3 A European Coordination Committee for the Lunar Gateway ................................................ 4 ESA awards contract to drill and analyse lunar subsoil ........................................................ 4 EU Commission invests in space .................................................................................. 4 Galileo’s Return Link Service is operational .................................................................... 4 Quality control contract on Earth Observation data ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Metallogenic Belt and Mineral Deposit Maps for Northeast Asia
    Preliminary Metallogenic Belt and Mineral Deposit Maps for Northeast Asia By Sergey M. Rodionov1, Alexander A. Obolenskiy2, Elimir G. Distanov2, Gombosuren Badarch3, Gunchin Dejidmaa4, Duk Hwan Hwang5, Alexander I.Khanchuk6, Masatsugu Ogasawara7, Warren J. Nokleberg8, Leonid M. Parfenov9, Andrei V. Prokopiev9, Zhan V. Seminskiy10, Alexander P. Smelov9, Hongquan Yan11, Gennandiy V. Birul'kin9, Yuriy V. V. Davydov9, Valeriy Yu. Fridovskiy12 , Gennandiy N. Gamyanin9, Ochir Gerel13, Alexei V. Kostin9, Sergey A. Letunov14, Xujun Li11, Valeriy M. Nikitin12, Sadahisa Sudo7 Vitaly I. Sotnikov2, Alexander V. Spiridonov14, Vitaly A. Stepanov15, Fengyue Sun11, Jiapeng Sun11, Weizhi Sun11, Valeriy M. Supletsov9, Vladimir F. Timofeev9, Oleg A. Tyan9, Valeriy G. Vetluzhskikh9, Koji Wakita7, Yakov V. Yakovlev9, and Lydia M. Zorina14 Open-File Report 03-204 2003 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk 2 Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 3 Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 4 Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 5 Korean Institute of Geology, Mining, and Materials, Taejon 6 Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 7 Geological Survey of Japan/AIST, Tsukuba 8 U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park 9 Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk 10 Irkutsk State Technical University, Irkutsk 11 Jilin University, Changchun 12 Yakutian State University, Yakutsk 13 Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Ulaanbaatar 14 Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk 15 Russian Academy of Sciences, Blagoveschensk 1 Prepared in Collaboration with Russian Academy of Sciences, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Jilin University (Changchun Branch), Korean Institute of Geology, Mining, and Materials, and Geological Survey of Japan/AIST.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Science Publishers, Inc
    Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Art Director: Christopher Concannon Graphics: Elenor Kallberg and Maria Ester Hawrys Book Production: Michael Lyons, Roseann Pena, Casey Pfalzer, June Martino, Tammy Sauter, and Michelle Lalo Circulation: Irene Kwartiroff, Annette Hellinger, and Benjamin Fung Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data Vachnadze, Georgii Nikolaevich Russia’s hotbeds of tension / George N. Vachnadze p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1560721413: $59.00 1. Russia (Federation)—Ethnic relations. 2. RegionalismRussia (Federation). 3. Russia (Federation)Politics and government — 1991 I. Title. DK510.33.V33 1993 9321645 305.8’00947~dc20 CIP © 1994 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 6080 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 207 Commack, New York 11725 Tele. 5164993103 Fax 5164993146 EMail [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means: elec tronic, electrostatic, magnetic, tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without permission from the publishers. Printed in the United States of America TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Russia to follow the path of the USSR 1 PART ONE REGIONS THREATEN MOSCOW WITH DIVORCE URALS. Nuclear Discharges in Kyshtym Equals 24 Chernobyl Accidents 13 SIBERIA. Petrodollars Prolonged the Agony of Communism for 30 Years 25 RUSSIAN NORTH. Genocide: From Stalinist Camps to Nuclear Dumps and Testing Ranges 50 FAR EAST. In One Boat with the Japanese, Koreans, Chinese and Americans 66 PART TWO REPUBLICS WITH LITTLE IN COMMON WITH ORTHODOX CHURCH LEGACY OF COMMUNISTS AND GOLDEN HORDE BASHKORTOSTAN. Overwhelming Catastrophes 77 BURYATIA. Buddhism Revived 84 CHUVASHIA. Famous Dark Beer 90 KARELIA. Ruined Part of Finland 91 KOMI.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Fishery Research Stations in the USSR, 1969
    , LIBRARY 0, This series includes unpublished preliminary reports 150foRD Of CA*9 FISHERIES RESEARCH and data records not intended for general distribution. They should not be referred to in publications with- BIOLOGIC& STATION, out clearance from the issuing Board establishment and ST. JOHN'S, NEWFOUNDLAND, CANADA. without clear indication of their manuscript status. FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA MANUSCRIPT REPORT SERIES No. 1091 Some Fishery Research Stations in the USSR, 1969 by W. E. Ricker Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. June 1970 This series includes unpublished preliminary reports and data records not intended for general distribution. They should not be referred to in publications with­ out clearance from the issuing Board establishment and without clear indication of their manuscript status. FISHERIES RESEARCH BOll.BD OF CANADA MANUSCRIPT REPORT SERIES No. 1091 Some Fishery. Research Stations in the USSR~ 1969 by W. E. Ricker Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. June 1970 CONTENTS Foreword 2 Moscow Days 3 Account of a Visit to Fish and Fishery Facilities at Volgograd, with Incidental Information 29 Discursive Account of a Visit to the Institute for the Biology of Inland Waters at Borok 42 Summary Account of a Visit to Kiev 57 Visit to the State Research Institute for Lake and River Fisheries, Leningrad 69 A Trip to Murmansk 77 News from Siberia 87 Visit to Georgia (Gruzinskii SSR) 103 2 FOREWORD From mid-May to mid-November, 1969, I was in the USSR as exchange scientist with VNIRO, their central marine fisheries research laboratory. At intervals visits were made to other research centres. A series of informal reports concerning these was prepared from time to time, and these were distributed to FRB stations and laboratories.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER FOUR What Is Siberia to Russia?
    Durham E-Theses Russia's Great Power Ambitions: The Role of Siberia, the Russian Far East, and the Arctic in Russia's Contemporary Relations with Northeast Asia CONTRERAS-LUNA, RAFAEL How to cite: CONTRERAS-LUNA, RAFAEL (2016) Russia's Great Power Ambitions: The Role of Siberia, the Russian Far East, and the Arctic in Russia's Contemporary Relations with Northeast Asia, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12034/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 RUSSIA’S GREAT POWER AMBITIONS: THE ROLE OF SIBERIA, THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST, AND THE ARCTIC IN RUSSIA’S CONTEMPORARY RELATIONS WITH NORTHEAST ASIA ________________________________________________________________________ Rafael Contreras Luna Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Government and International Affairs Durham University 2016 i ABSTRACT Being at the confluence of two worlds – East and West – has had long-term influence on how Russia has thought of its national identity, in particular prompting the question: to what extent is it joining or resisting these two worlds? This thesis argues that Russia’s self- perception of being a great power – greatpowerness - defines its status and position in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Asia. Nationality Has Been the Basis for the New Divisions
    RUSSIAN ASIA BY I. A. LOPATIX LIFE OF THE RUSSIAN COLONISTS AND SETTLERS IT IS generally believed that the Russians first came into Asia in 1581 under the leadership of Yermak, a Don Cossack. This, however, is an erroneous idea. The Russian traders of Great Nov- gorod penetrated into Siberia more than two centuries earlier. They established trading posts on the lower Ob and started peaceful coloni- zation of the country. Yermak, on the contrary, had a military mis- sion. \\'ith the financial aid of Stroganov, wealthy and powerful merchant of the Ural district, he organized a military detachment and attacked Kuchum, Khan of the Siberian Kingdom bordering on Rus- sia. After Yermak's triumphal entry into Kuchum's capital, Ivan the Terrible, then czar of Russia, sent five hundred soldiers as re- inforcement, and the conquest of Siberia began in earnest. By 1630 the Lena was occupied: in 1640 Semen Dejnev rounded the north- eastern point of Asia, and in 1643 Poyarkov sailed to the mouth of the Amur. Three years later Khabarov successfully invaded the whole Amur region ; thus was the vast territory of northern Asia conquered in the course of fifty years. Xo similar feat is known to history. The ad\ance of the Russians into Transcaucasia and Central Asia, however, was not so rapid. A part of Georgia surrendered in 1798, and by 1810 the entire province had been added to the Rus- sian empire. The remaining Transcaucasian territory was taken after the war with Turke\- in 1878, while Central Asia was con- quered by the Russians only in the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]