Families of Picard Modular Forms and an Application to the Bloch-Kato Conjecture
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Armand Borel (1923–2003), Volume 51, Number 5
Armand Borel (1923–2003) James Arthur, Enrico Bombieri, Komaravolu Chandrasekharan, Friedrich Hirzebruch, Gopal Prasad, Jean-Pierre Serre, Tonny A. Springer, and Jacques Tits Citations within this article. Borel’s Collected Papers are [Œ], and his 17 books are referred to as [1] through [17]. These are all listed in a sidebar on page 501. An item like [Œ 23] is Borel paper number 23 in [Œ]. Ci- tations of work by people other than Borel are by letter combinations such as [Che], and the de- tails appear at the end of the article. their root systems. He spent the year 1949–50 in 1 Institute for Advanced Study, 1999. Paris, with a grant from the CNRS . A good choice Armand Borel (for us, as well as for him), Paris being the very spot where what Americans have called “French Topol- Jean-Pierre Serre ogy” was being created, with the courses from The Swiss mathematician Armand Borel died Leray at the Collège de France and the Cartan sem- August 11, 2003, in Princeton from a rapidly evolv- inar at the École Normale Supérieure. Borel was an ing cancer. Few foreign mathematicians had as active participant in the Cartan seminar while many connections with France. He was a student closely following Leray’s courses. He managed to of Leray, he took part in the Cartan seminar, and understand the famous “spectral sequence”, not an he published more than twenty papers in collabo- easy task, and he explained it to me so well that I ration with our colleagues Lichnerowicz and Tits, have not stopped using it since. -
Armand Borel 1923–2003
Armand Borel 1923–2003 A Biographical Memoir by Mark Goresky ©2019 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. ARMAND BOREL May 21, 1923–August 11, 2003 Elected to the NAS, 1987 Armand Borel was a leading mathematician of the twen- tieth century. A native of Switzerland, he spent most of his professional life in Princeton, New Jersey, where he passed away after a short illness in 2003. Although he is primarily known as one of the chief archi- tects of the modern theory of linear algebraic groups and of arithmetic groups, Borel had an extraordinarily wide range of mathematical interests and influence. Perhaps more than any other mathematician in modern times, Borel elucidated and disseminated the work of others. family the Borel of Photo courtesy His books, conference proceedings, and journal publica- tions provide the document of record for many important mathematical developments during his lifetime. By Mark Goresky Mathematical objects and results bearing Borel’s name include Borel subgroups, Borel regulator, Borel construction, Borel equivariant cohomology, Borel-Serre compactification, Bailey- Borel compactification, Borel fixed point theorem, Borel-Moore homology, Borel-Weil theorem, Borel-de Siebenthal theorem, and Borel conjecture.1 Borel was awarded the Brouwer Medal (Dutch Mathematical Society), the Steele Prize (American Mathematical Society) and the Balzan Prize (Italian-Swiss International Balzan Foundation). He was a member of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Philosophical Society, the Finnish Academy of Sciences and Letters, the Academia Europa, and the French Academy of Sciences.1 1 Borel enjoyed pointing out, with some amusement, that he was not related to the famous Borel of “Borel sets." 2 ARMAND BOREL Switzerland and France Armand Borel was born in 1923 in the French-speaking city of La Chaux-de-Fonds in Switzerland. -
Interview with Research Fellow Peter Scholze 12
2012 CLAY MATHEMATICS INSTITUTE annual report mission The primary objectives and purposes of the Clay Mathematics Institute are: l to increase and disseminate mathematical knowledge l to educate mathematicians and other scientists about new discoveries in the field of mathematics l to encourage gifted students to pursue mathematical careers l to recognize extraordinary achievements and advances in mathematical research The CMI will further the beauty, power and universality of mathematical thought. The Clay Mathematics Institute is governed by its Board of Directors, Scientific Advisory Board and President. Board meet- ings are held to consider nominations and research proposals and to conduct other business. The Scientific Advisory Board is responsible for the approval of all proposals and the selection of all nominees. CLAY MATHEMATICS INSTITUTE Board of Directors and Executive Officers Landon T. Clay, Chairman, Director, Treasurer Lavinia D. Clay, Director, Secretary Thomas Clay, Director James A. Carlson, President (through June 2012) Nicholas Woodhouse, President (from July 2012) David Ellwood, Research Director (through August 2012) Brian James, Chief Administrative Officer Scientific Advisory Board Simon Donaldson, Imperial College London Gregory A. Margulis, Yale University (through June 2012) Richard B. Melrose, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Andrei Okounkov, Columbia University (from July 2012) Yum-Tong Siu, Harvard University Andrew Wiles, University of Oxford One Bow Street Staff Julie Feskoe, Administrative Assistant -
Abstracts 1.2 )255(6($5&+,10$7+(0$7,&$/6&,(1&(6
7+(),(/'6,167,787( ABSTRACTS 1.2 )255(6($5&+,10$7+(0$7,&$/6&,(1&(6 JOSEPH BERNSTEIN Tel Aviv University Subconvexity estimates and representation theory Important role in number theory play estimates of the following type. We have a function f(t) of real variable t and we would like to find upper bound estimates for jf(t)j for large t. The function f is usually normalized in such a way that we expect it to satisfy jf(t)j << t. Usually one gives an average bound of the type jf(t)j2dt << l(I)T ZI where I is some interval around T and l(I) denotes its length. Bounds of such type when l(I) is of order T are colled "convexity bounds". Bounds of such type over the intervals much shorter than T are called \subconvexity bounds". In my talk I would like to explain how using representation theory one can prove some subconvexity bounds for triple periods of automorphic forms of the group G = SL(2; R) with respect to a discrete subgroup Γ ⊂ G. These estimates essentially give subconvexity bounds for the corresponding triple L-function (of degree 8). The main new feature of our proof is that we do not use any arithmetic information about the group Γ, only very explicit knowledge of representations of the group G. BILL CASSELMAN University of British Columbia Truncation and buildings This talk will (I hope) explain how results about reduction theory and Arthur's truncation operator can be simplified by using the rational Tits building. -
Iasthe Institute Letter
- - - er 2010 Summer etc. But this case is deceptively simple, 8, – 12= – 6 3+ – 1 3+6=4, – 1 e Institute Lett 2, – 3= – Th research and emphasized the “usefulness of useless knowledge.” It was his belief that tradition has changed the course of subject, leading to profound discoveries in AS work at the Institute and demonstrates a belief in unity of mathematics that extends theory, collectively known as the Langlands program. The proof of fundamental lemma, theory, will be found to an indispensable link in a long and complex chain that may open new in theoretical physics. it and paves the way for progress in understanding underlying mathematical structures connections to physics. story of the fundamental lemma, its proof, and deep insights it provides into diverse fields simplest case of the fundamental lemma counts points with alternating signs at various distances was formulated by Robert Langlands, Professor Emeritus in the School of Mathematics, and in theory and practice.” resisted all attempts for nearly three decades, firmly establishes many theorems that had The fundamental lemma, a technical device that links automorphic representations of different different mathematical fields, and forms the basis of the School’s interaction with the School different mathematical fields, and forms the basis of School’s out of a set overarching and interconnected conjectures that link number theory repre also poignantly underscores the Institute’s continual commitment to the philosophy of Abra also poignantly underscores the Institute’s of many mathematicians associated with the Institute for Advanced Study over past thirty the center of a certain tree-like structure. -
Armand Borel (1923–2003)
Armand Borel (1923–2003) James Arthur, Enrico Bombieri, Komaravolu Chandrasekharan, Friedrich Hirzebruch, Gopal Prasad, Jean-Pierre Serre, Tonny A. Springer, and Jacques Tits Citations within this article. Borel’s Collected Papers are [Œ], and his 17 books are referred to as [1] through [17]. These are all listed in a sidebar on page 501. An item like [Œ 23] is Borel paper number 23 in [Œ]. Ci- tations of work by people other than Borel are by letter combinations such as [Che], and the de- tails appear at the end of the article. their root systems. He spent the year 1949–50 in 1 Institute for Advanced Study, 1999. Paris, with a grant from the CNRS . A good choice Armand Borel (for us, as well as for him), Paris being the very spot where what Americans have called “French Topol- Jean-Pierre Serre ogy” was being created, with the courses from The Swiss mathematician Armand Borel died Leray at the Collège de France and the Cartan sem- August 11, 2003, in Princeton from a rapidly evolv- inar at the École Normale Supérieure. Borel was an ing cancer. Few foreign mathematicians had as active participant in the Cartan seminar while many connections with France. He was a student closely following Leray’s courses. He managed to of Leray, he took part in the Cartan seminar, and understand the famous “spectral sequence”, not an he published more than twenty papers in collabo- easy task, and he explained it to me so well that I ration with our colleagues Lichnerowicz and Tits, have not stopped using it since.