DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 36/Friday, February 22

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 36/Friday, February 22 9740 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules § 447.82 Restrictions on payments to calendar year and then rounded to the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND providers. next higher 10-cent increment. SECURITY The plan must provide that the * * * * * agency reduces the payment it makes to Federal Emergency Management any provider by the amount of a (4) For Federal Fiscal Year 2007, any Agency recipient’s cost sharing obligation, deductible the State imposes may not regardless of whether the provider exceed $3.20 per month, per family for 44 CFR Part 67 each period of eligibility. Thereafter, successfully collects the cost sharing. [Docket No. FEMA–B–7763] any deductible may not exceed this PART 457—ALLOTMENTS AND amount as updated each October 1 by Proposed Flood Elevation GRANTS TO STATES the percentage increase in the medical Determinations care component of the CPI-U for the 5. The authority citation for part 457 period of September to September AGENCY: Federal Emergency continues to read as follows: ending in the preceding calendar year Management Agency, DHS. Authority: Section 1102 of the Social and then rounded to the next higher 10- ACTION: Proposed rule. Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302). cent increment. SUMMARY: Comments are requested on 6. Section 457.555 is amended by— * * * * * the proposed Base (1 percent annual- a. Republishing paragraph (a) (c) Institutional emergency services. chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and introductory text. For Federal Fiscal Year 2007, any proposed BFE modifications for the b. Revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), copayment that the State imposes on communities listed in the table below. and (a)(4). emergency services provided by an The purpose of this notice is to seek c. Revising paragraph (c). institution may not exceed $5.20. general information and comment d. Revising paragraph (d). regarding the proposed regulatory flood Thereafter, any copayment may not The republication and revisions read elevations for the reach described by the exceed this amount as updated each as follows: downstream and upstream locations in October 1 by the percentage increase in the table below. The BFEs and modified § 457.555 Maximum allowable cost sharing the medical care component of the CPI- BFEs are a part of the floodplain charges on targeted low-income children in U for the period of September to management measures that the families with income from 101 to 150 September ending in the preceding percent of the FPL. community is required either to adopt calendar year and then rounded to the or show evidence of having in effect in (a) Non-institutional services. For next higher 10-cent increment. order to qualify or remain qualified for targeted low-income children whose (d) Non-emergency use of the participation in the National Flood family income is from 101 to 150 emergency room. For Federal Fiscal Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, percent of the FPL, the State plan must these elevations, once finalized, will be provide that for non-institutional Year 2007, for targeted low-income children whose family income is from used by insurance agents, and others to services, including emergency services, calculate appropriate flood insurance the following requirements must be met: 101 to 150 percent of the FPL, the State may charge up to twice the charge for premium rates for new buildings and (1)(i) For Federal Fiscal Year 2007, the contents in those buildings. any copayment or similar charge the non-institutional services, up to a DATES: Comments are to be submitted State imposes under a fee-for-service maximum amount of $10.40, for on or before May 22, 2008. delivery system may not exceed the services furnished in a hospital following amounts: emergency room if those services are not ADDRESSES: The corresponding emergency services as defined in preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each Total cost Maximum § 457.10. Thereafter, any charge may not amount exceed this amount as updated each community are available for inspection October 1 by the percentage increase in at the community’s map repository. The $15.00 or less ........................... $1.10 respective addresses are listed in the $15.01 to $40 ........................... 2.10 the medical care component of the CPI- U for the period of September to table below. $40.01 to $80 ........................... 3.20 You may submit comments, identified $80.01 or more ......................... 5.20 September ending in the preceding by Docket No. FEMA–B–7763, to calendar year and then rounded to the William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief, (ii) Thereafter, any copayments may next higher 10-cent increment. Engineering Management Branch, not exceed these amounts as updated * * * * * Mitigation Directorate, Federal each October 1 by the percentage (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Emergency Management Agency, 500 C increase in the medical care component Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, of the CPI-U for the period of September Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance Program) (202) 646–3151, or (e-mail) to September ending in the preceding [email protected]. calendar year and then rounded to the Dated: October 5, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: next higher 10-cent increment. Kerry Weems, (2) For Federal Fiscal Year 2007, any William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief, Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare Engineering Management Branch, copayment that the State imposes for & Medicaid Services. services provided by a managed care Mitigation Directorate, Federal organization may not exceed $5.20 per Approved: November 1, 2007. Emergency Management Agency, 500 C visit. Thereafter, any copayment may Michael O. Leavitt, Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, not exceed this amount as updated each Secretary. (202) 646–3151 or.(e-mail) [email protected]. October 1 by the percentage increase in [FR Doc. E8–3211 Filed 2–21–08; 8:45 am] the medical care component of the CPI- BILLING CODE 4120–01–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U for the period of September to Federal Emergency Management Agency September ending in the preceding (FEMA) proposes to make VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:29 Feb 21, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22FEP1.SGM 22FEP1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules 9741 determinations of BFEs and modified A letter acknowledging receipt of any under the criteria of section 3(f) of BFEs for each community listed below, comments will not be sent. Executive Order 12866, as amended. in accordance with section 110 of the Administrative Procedure Act Executive Order 13132, Federalism. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Statement. This matter is not a This proposed rule involves no policies 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a). rulemaking governed by the that have federalism implications under These proposed BFEs and modified Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 Executive Order 13132. BFEs, together with the floodplain U.S.C. 553. FEMA publishes flood Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice management criteria required by 44 CFR elevation determinations for notice and Reform. This proposed rule meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 60.3, are the minimum that are required. comment; however, they are governed 12988. They should not be construed to mean by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of that the community must change any 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and the National List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67 Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. existing ordinances that are more Administrative practice and stringent in their floodplain 4001, et seq., and do not fall under the APA. procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting management requirements. The and recordkeeping requirements. community may at any time enact National Environmental Policy Act. Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is stricter requirements of its own, or This proposed rule is categorically proposed to be amended as follows: pursuant to policies established by other excluded from the requirements of 44 Federal, State, or regional entities. CFR part 10, Environmental PART 67—[AMENDED] These proposed elevations are used to Consideration. An environmental meet the floodplain management impact assessment has not been 1. The authority citation for part 67 requirements of the NFIP and are also prepared. continues to read as follows: used to calculate the appropriate flood Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001, et seq.; insurance premium rates for new elevation determinations are not within Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, buildings built after these elevations are the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. made final, and for the contents in these Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory buildings. flexibility analysis is not required. § 67.4 [Amended] Comments on any aspect of the Flood Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 2. The tables published under the Insurance Study and FIRM, other than Planning and Review. This proposed authority of § 67.4 are proposed to be the proposed BFEs, will be considered. rule is not a significant regulatory action amended as follows: * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) # Depth in feet above Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation ** ground Communities affected Effective Modified Alameda County, California, and Incorporated Areas Arroyo Las Positas ................ Approximately 1,155 feet downstream of North Liver- None +444 City of Livermore. more Avenue. Approximately 1,040 feet downstream of North Liver- None +445 more Avenue. Arroyo Las Positas (Shallow Approximately 530 feet east of the intersection of Air- #1.5 #2 City of Livermore. Flooding). way Boulevard and Terminal Court. Arroyo del Valle .................... Approximately 0.7 mile downstream of Arroyo Road .. None +514 Unincorporated Areas of Alameda County.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elkin & Jonesville
    ELKIN & JONESVILLE WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION PLAN The Piedmont Triad Regional Council is is working with stakeholders to ensure lon-term ecological health and public use of the the water supply for the Towns of Elkin & Jonesville. While waters in Big Elkin Creek and around the Yadkin River intake are not rated as impaired, both fail to meet their full potential as public and ecological resources, and have opportunities to be restored to greater function as natural and recreational resources. Water Supply Protection Plan Town of Elkin & Town of Jonesville February 2015 Cy Stober, Senior Regional Planner Joy Fields, Planner I Marc Allred, GIS Planner Elizabeth Jernigan, Planner II With Support From Table of Contents ELKIN & JONESVILLE ........................................................................................................... I WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION PLAN .................................................................................... I Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... v Figures & Tables .................................................................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 WATERSHED CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 7 Background ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilkes Land Grant Summary Grouped by River System and Sub System
    Wilkes Land Grant Summary Grouped By River System and Sub System 7,976 Land Grants 708,896 acres among those grants. Today Wilkes Co covers 484,480 acres. In addition to today's boundaries, Wilkes County originally included what is now Alleghany and Ashe counties. It also included parts of Watauga, Caldwell, Alexander and Surry counties. Sorted by river system: Catawba, New, South Yadkin, Unknown, Watauga, Yadkin. Then one page for each sub-system: Roaring River, Hunting Creek, Lewis Fork, etc. Jason Duncan ([email protected]) Wednesday, September 30, 2020 http://www.webjmd.com Page 1 of 39 Catawba River 99 grants assigned 1% of the Wilkes grants are assigned to this river system 6,302acres among these grants 1% of the acreage among all Wilkes grants is assigned to this river system Catawba River 99 grants 1% of the Wilkes grants are assigned to S of Wilkes Co this sub system 6,302 acres among these grants 1% of the acreage among all Wilkes grants is assigned to this sub system 0 acres in Wilkes Co today Modern Blair Fork, Davis Creek, Duck Creek, Ginger Creek, Grassy Creek, Holsclaw Creek, Lambert Creeks: Fork, Lower Creek, Lower Little River, McRary Creek, Mill Pond Branch, Millers Creek, Mountain Run, Poplar Creek, White Creek, Zacks Fork Creek Old Jones Branch, Tumbling Fork Creeks: Landmarks: Jason Duncan ([email protected]) Wednesday, September 30, 2020 http://www.webjmd.com Page 2 of 39 New River 734 grants assigned 9% of the Wilkes grants are assigned to this river system 113,567acres among these grants 16% of the acreage among
    [Show full text]
  • Nc Deq - Divison of Water Resources 2B .0300
    NC DEQ - DIVISON OF WATER RESOURCES 2B .0300 . 0309 YADKIN RIVER BASIN Name of Stream Description Class Class Date Index No. YADKIN RIVER From source to mouth in W. Kerr C;Tr 04/15/63 12-(1) Scott Reservoir at Elevation 1030 Groundhog Branch From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-2 Horse Branch From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-3 Martin Branch From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-4 Bailey Camp Creek From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-5 Ooten Creek From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-6 Dennis Creek From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-7 Mine Branch From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-8 Orchard Branch From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-9 Jackson Camp Creek From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-10 Cook Branch From source to Jackson Camp Creek C;Tr 04/15/63 12-10-1 Muddy Branch From source to Jackson Camp Creek C;Tr 04/15/63 12-10-2 Toms Branch From source to Jackson Camp Creek C;Tr 04/15/63 12-10-3 Addies Branch From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-11 Flat Branch From source to Addies Branch C;Tr 04/15/63 12-11-1 Preston Creek From source to Yadkin River C;Tr 04/15/63 12-12 Puncheon Camp Creek From source to Preston Creek C;Tr 04/15/63 12-12-1 Greenfield Branch From source to Puncheon Camp C;Tr 04/15/63 12-12-1-1 Creek Kirby Creek From source to Preston Creek C;Tr 04/15/63 12-12-2 Orchard Branch From source to Preston Creek C;Tr 04/15/63 12-12-3 Wolfpen Creek From source to Preston Creek C;Tr 04/15/63 12-12-4 Red Rock Creek From source to Preston Creek C;Tr
    [Show full text]
  • Wilkes Class: %
    Report Date: 09/01/07 North Carolina Waterbodies Listed by County Records Found: 195 Search Parameters: Note: Waterbodies are listed in more than one county if they cross county lines. County: Wilkes Class: % No Records Returned! SpDes: % Name: % Index#: % Name of Stream Description Curr. Class Date Basin Stream Index # Wilkes County YADKIN RIVER From source to mouth C;Tr 04/15/63 Yadkin 12-(1) in W. Kerr Scott Reservoir at Elevation 1030 YADKIN RIVER (W. From a point 3.2 mile WS-IV,B;Tr 04/01/99 Yadkin 12-(27.5) Kerr Scott downstream of Stony Reservoir below Fork to W. Kerr Scott Elevation 1030) Dam YADKIN RIVER (W. From mouth in W. Kerr B;Tr 04/01/99 Yadkin 12-(27) Kerr Scott Scott Reservoir at Reservoir below Elevation 1030 (1.4 Elevation 1030) mile downstream of Stony Fork) to a point 3.2 mile downstream of Stony Fork YADKIN RIVER From W. Kerr Scott Dam WS-IV 08/03/92 Yadkin 12-(34) to a point 0.4 mile upstream of Tucker Hole Creek YADKIN RIVER From a point 0.4 mile WS-IV;CA 08/03/92 Yadkin 12-(36.5) upstream of Tucker Hole Creek to Moravian Creek (Town of Wilkesboro water supply intake) YADKIN RIVER From Moravian Creek to C 04/06/55 Yadkin 12-(38) a point 1.0 mile upstream of Roaring River YADKIN RIVER From a point 1.0 mile WS-V 08/01/98 Yadkin 12-(45) upstream of Roaring River to a point 0.2 mile upstream of the mouth of Big Bugaboo Creek YADKIN RIVER From a point 0.2 mile WS-IV 08/01/98 Yadkin 12-(47.5) upstream of Big Bugaboo Creek to a point 0.9 mile upstream of mouth of Elkin Creek (River) South Yadkin From source to a point WS-II;HQW 08/03/92 Yadkin 12-108-(1) River 0.6 mile upstream of Alexander County SR 1456 Page 1 of 10 Name of Stream Description Curr.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 187/Thursday, September 25, 2008
    55442 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 187 / Thursday, September 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations Executive Order 12866 ACTION: Final rule. modified BFEs are made final in the communities listed below. Elevations at This amendment is exempt from SUMMARY: Base (1% annual chance) selected locations in each community review under Executive Order 12866, Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified are shown. but has been reviewed internally by the BFEs are made final for the Department of State to ensure communities listed below. The BFEs National Environmental Policy Act. consistency with the purposes thereof. and modified BFEs are the basis for the This final rule is categorically excluded Paperwork Reduction Act floodplain management measures that from the requirements of 44 CFR part each community is required either to 10, Environmental Consideration. An This rule does not impose any new adopt or to show evidence of being environmental impact assessment has reporting or recordkeeping requirements already in effect in order to qualify or subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, not been prepared. remain qualified for participation in the 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood National Flood Insurance Program elevation determinations are not within List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 126 (NFIP). the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Arms and munitions, Exports. DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory ■ Accordingly, for the reasons set forth Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing flexibility analysis is not required. above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter BFEs and modified BFEs for each Regulatory Classification.
    [Show full text]