DOCSLIB.ORG

Brown Long-Eared Bat Roost Monitoring Scheme for Republic of Ireland: Synthesis Report 2007-2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brown Long-Eared Bat Roost Monitoring Scheme for Republic of Ireland: Synthesis Report 2007-2010 Brown long‐eared bat roost monitoring scheme for Republic of Ireland: synthesis report 2007‐2010 Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 56 Brown long‐eared bat roost monitoring scheme for the Republic of Ireland: synthesis report 2007‐2010 Tina Aughney1, Steve Langton2 and Niamh Roche1 1. www.batconservationireland.org 2. [email protected] Citation: Aughney, T., Langton, S. & Roche, N. (2011) Brown long‐eared bat roost monitoring scheme for the Republic of Ireland: synthesis report 2007‐2010. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 56. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland. Keywords: bats, monitoring, roosts, Plecotus auritus, volunteers, woodland, NPWS, Ireland Cover photos: Brown long‐eared bat by Frank Greenaway © NPWS The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Dr Ferdia Marnell; [email protected] Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2011 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Brown long‐eared bat monitoring 2007‐2010 __________________________________ Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Why Monitor Brown Long‐eared Bats? ................................................................................................... 5 Red & Amber Alerts ................................................................................................................................... 6 Factors Influencing the Design of the Brown Long‐eared Roost Monitoring Scheme ...................... 7 Potential Problems with Monitoring from Colony Counts ................................................................. 10 Volunteers .................................................................................................................................................. 11 Weather Conditions from 2007 to 2010 .................................................................................................. 11 Aims of the Brown Long‐eared Roost Monitoring Scheme ................................................................ 12 The Aims of this Synthesis Report .......................................................................................................... 13 Methods .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Preliminary Roost Assessment ................................................................................................................ 14 Annual Roost Counts ............................................................................................................................... 15 AnaBat Frequency Division Bat Detectors ............................................................................................ 16 Power Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Trend Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 18 GIS Analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Brown Long‐eared Bat Habitats and Roosting Requirements ............................................................ 18 Results ............................................................................................................................................................ 20 Volunteer Participation ............................................................................................................................ 20 Volunteer Training and Survey Time ................................................................................................ 21 Volunteer Contribution: A Financial Perspective ............................................................................. 21 Buildings Surveyed ................................................................................................................................... 22 Roosts Monitored .................................................................................................................................. 22 Roost Categories .................................................................................................................................... 25 Additional Roosts Surveyed ................................................................................................................ 26 Roost Colony Size ................................................................................................................................. 29 Ease of Monitoring & New Roosts ..................................................................................................... 30 Survey Period ............................................................................................................................................ 31 AnaBat Frequency Division Bat Detector Recordings ......................................................................... 32 Power Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 33 Trend Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 36 1 Brown long‐eared bat monitoring 2007‐2010 __________________________________ GIS Analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 37 Percentage of Woodland & Forestry Habitat .................................................................................... 37 Proximity to Woodland & Forestry Habitat: Commuting Routes ................................................. 38 Brown Long‐eared Bat Habitat and Roosting Requirements ......................................................... 39 Discussion ...................................................................................................................................................... 44 Survey Effort .............................................................................................................................................. 44 Volunteer Teams ................................................................................................................................... 44 Roost Owner Participation .................................................................................................................. 45 Cost Efficiency ....................................................................................................................................... 45 Survey Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 45 Geographic Coverage ............................................................................................................................... 46 Potential Roosts for Investigation ....................................................................................................... 47 Buildings Surveyed .................................................................................................................................. 48 Roost Loss from Dataset .......................................................................................................................... 48 Monitoring Dataset and Trend Analysis ............................................................................................... 49 Power Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 49 Effects of Reducing the Survey Protocol ............................................................................................ 50 Automated Roost Counts using AnaBat ................................................................................................ 50 GIS Analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 51 Percentage of Woodland & Forestry Habitat .................................................................................... 51 Proximity to Woodland & Forestry Habitat: Commuting Routes ................................................. 51 Brown Long‐eared Bat Habitat and Roosting Requirements ......................................................... 52 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 53 Bibliography & Relevant Literature ........................................................................................................... 54 Appendix 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 56 Appendix 2 ...................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Records of Nyctalus Noctula Social Calls in Portugal
    Vespertilio 17: 37–44, 2014 ISSN 1213-6123 First records of Nyctalus noctula social calls in Portugal Paulo BARROS, Luís BRAZ, Hélia Marisa vale-Gonçalves & João Alexandre Cabral Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal; [email protected] Abstract. The common noctule (Nyctalus noctula) is a large and fast flying Palaearctic migratory bat. The range of the species distribution extends in longitude from the Iberian Peninsula to Japan and in latitude from North Africa to the southern part of the Scandinavian countries. However, in the southern part of its distribution range, most of the potential maternity colonies are unknown or found only spo- radically. This note presents the first records of N. noctula social calls in Portugal. In fact, two types of N. noctula socials calls (C1 and D1) were recorded and identified at a site in the Sabor river valley in northern Portugal, which are usually associated with mating roosts. Therefore, these new data may contribute to improve and update the knowledge of the location of potential new mating, swarming and hibernation sites, as well as of the mating season length and behavioural patterns of this migratory species throughout its European range. Nyctalus noctula, social calls, bat swarming, Portugal Introduction The common noctule, Nyctalus noctula (Schreber, 1774), is a large and fast flying Palaearctic bat, with broad rounded ears, rufous-brown fur, which is slightly darker on the dorsum, and has long narrow wings covered with short hair on the underside of the membrane close to the body (Dietz et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Long-Eared Bat (Plecotus; Vespertilionidae, Mammalia) from Ethiopia
    A new species of long-eared bat (Plecotus; Vespertilionidae, Mammalia) from Ethiopia Sergey V. Kruskop & Leonid A. Lavrenchenko Abstract. A new species of Plecotus is described, based on several specimens from southern Ethiopia, the southernmost distribution record of the genus. The new species differs from all known species of Plecotus in size, cranial proportions and pelage coloration. In some metric and qualitative traits (skull size and face shape) it resembles P. auritus. The similarities between these two species may be convergent, though. The shape of the baculum of the new species is strikingly similar to that of the insular P. teneriffae. At present the phylogenetic relationships among the species of Plecotus remain unresolved. Key words: Plecotus, new species, taxonomy, systematics, craniometry, Ethiopia. Introduction Plecotine bats are a rather small group within the family Vespertilionidae. Never- theless, their taxonomy is unsettled and therefore has been the subject of several revisions (Fedyk & Ruprecht 1983, Frost & Timm 1992). The genus Plecotus E. Geoffroy, 1818 s. str. includes two to four currently recognized species but also many named taxa of uncertain rank (Yoshiyuki 1991). Most of these taxa are pres- ently included in the polymorphous species P. austriacus (Fischer, 1829) which is widely distributed from Algeria and Central Europe to the Arabian peninsula and the Himalayas (Strelkov 1988). The characters in which it differs from the also widely distributed but more monomorphic P. auritus (Linnaeus, 1758) were de- scribed by Strelkov (1988). Plecotus austriacus was the only member of the genus known to occur in Africa (Corbet 1978), and the Ethiopian highlands were reported as the southernmost part of its distribution area there (Yalden et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods
    The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods A report prepared for The Woodland Trust The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods Andrew Carr, Dr Matt Zeale & Professor Gareth Jones School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ Report prepared for The Woodland Trust October 2016 Acknowledgements Thanks to: Dave Rickwood of the Woodland Trust for his central role and continued support throughout this project; Dr Andrew Weatherall of the University of Cumbria; Simon Lee of Natural England and James Mason of the Woodland Trust for helpful advice; Dr Beth Clare of Queen Mary University of London for support with molecular work; the many Woodland Trust volunteers and assistants that provided their time to the project. We would particularly like to thank Tom ‘the tracker’ Williams and Mike ‘the trapper’ Treble for dedicating so much of their time. We thank the Woodland Trust, Natural England and the Heritage Lottery Fund for funding this research. We also appreciate assistance from the local landowners who provided access to land. i Contents Acknowledgements i Contents ii List of figures and tables iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods 2 1.3 Objectives 2 2 Methods 2 2.1 Study area 2 2.2 Bat capture, tagging and radio-tracking 3 2.3 Habitat mapping 4 2.4 Analysis of roost preferences 5 2.5 Analysis of ranges and foraging areas 7 2.6 Analysis of diet 7 3 Results 8 3.1 Capture data 8 3.2 Roost selection and preferences 9 3.3 Ranging and foraging 14 3.4 Diet 17 4 Discussion 21 4.1 Roost use 21 4.2 Ranging behaviour 24 4.3 Diet 25 5 Conclusion 26 References 27 Appendix 1 Summary table of all bat captures 30 Appendix 2 Comparison of individual B.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Meeting of the Parties
    Inf.EUROBATS.MoP7.45 7th Meeting of the Parties Brussels, Belgium, 15 – 17 September 2014 Report on Autecological Studies for Priority Species Convenor: Stéphane Aulagnier In accordance with Resolution 4.12, the current work being carried out on autecological studies of the Priority List of species (Rhinolophus euryale, Myotis capaccinii and Miniopterus schreibersii) should be updated by the Advisory Committee and should be made public. References of papers and reports dealing with autecological studies Rhinolophus euryale Barataud M., Jemin J., Grugier Y. & Mazaud S., 2009. Étude sur les territoires de chasse du Rhinolophe euryale, Rhinolophus euryale, en Corrèze, site Natura 2000 des Abîmes de la Fage. Le Naturaliste. Vendéen, 9 : 43-55. The cave of la Fage (Noailles, Département of Corrèze) is a major site for the Mediterranean horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus euryale Blasius 1853. However, contrary to the tendency to increase noted over the last 20 years in various other birth sites in France, numbers at la Fage have shown no change. One of the suspected causes links this to the presence of the A20 motorway, less than a kilometre away, where corpses have been collected. This article presents the results of a radio-tracking study of the space occupied by the colony, during the summers of 2006 and 2007. Voigt C.C., Schuller B.M., Greif S. & Siemers B.M., 2010. Perch-hunting in insectivorous Rhinolophus bats is related to the high energy costs of manoeuvring in flight. Journal of Comparative Physiology Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology, 180(7): 1079-1088 Foraging behaviour of bats is supposedly largely influenced by the high costs of flapping flight.
    [Show full text]
  • Intra- and Interspecific Competition in Western Barbastelle Bats
    Intra- and interspecific competition in western barbastelle bats (Bbastell bastellus, SCHREBER 1774): Niche differentiation in a specialised bat species, revealed via radio-tracking. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades "Doktor der Naturwissenschaften" am Fachbereich Biologie der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz Jessica Hillen geb. am 09.01.1981 in Zell (Mosel) Mainz, 2011 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.12.2011 Western barbastelle bats in their tree roost. Background: View of the brook valley 'Ahringsbachtal'. Contents Contents. Abstract..............................................................................................................................................5 General introduction. ..........................................................................................................................7 Chapter I. Spatial organisation and foraging site fidelity of a population of female western barbastelle bats...................................................................................................................................................12 Abstract....................................................................................................................................13 1. Introduction. ....................................................................................................................14 2. Materials and methods......................................................................................................16 3. Results. ............................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Impact of Development Projects on Bat Populations: Comparing Pre- and Post-Development Bat Faunas
    2008 An investigation of the impact of development projects on bat populations: Comparing pre- and post-development bat faunas. IRISH BAT MONITORING PROGRAMME Bat Conservation Ireland 11/30/2008 An investigation of the impact of development projects on bat populations: Comparing pre‐ 2008 and post‐development bat faunas. Irish Bat Monitoring Programme An investigation of the impact of development projects on bat populations: Comparing pre- and post-development bat faunas. November 2008 Bat conservation Ireland, www.batconservationireland.org Citation: Aughney, T. (2008) An investigation of the impact of development projects on bat populations: Comparing pre- and post-development bat faunas. Irish Bat Monitoring Programme. Bat Conservation Ireland, www.batconservationireland.org. All Photographs courtesy of Tina Aughney 2 An investigation of the impact of development projects on bat populations: Comparing pre‐ 2008 and post‐development bat faunas. CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 5 1.1 Domestic Legislation 1.2 The EU Habitats Directive 1.3 International Treaties 1.3.1 The Berne Convention 1.3.2 The EUROBATS Agreement 1.4 The National Status of Irish Bat Species 2. Project Descriptions 9 3. Bat Box Schemes 14 3.1 Bat box designs 3.2 Survey Results 4. Roof Renovation Projects 24 5. Night-time Bat Detector Surveys 28 Bibliography 31 Acknowledgements 32 Appendices 33 3 An investigation of the impact of development projects on bat populations: Comparing pre‐ 2008 and post‐development bat faunas. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bat Conservation Ireland received funding (60%) from The Heritage Council to undertake this project. This report presents work undertaken during the field season of 2008 where twelve projects that constitute a selection of development projects previously surveyed for bat populations were resurveyed by Bat Conservation Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Changes in the Numbers of the Barbastelle Barbastella Barbastellus in Poland
    Folia Zool. – 54 (4): 351–358 (2005) Long-term changes in the numbers of the barbastelle Barbastella barbastellus in Poland Grzegorz LESIŃSKI1, Elżbieta FUSZARA2, Maciej FUSZARA2, Mirosław JURCZYSZYN3 and Zbigniew URBAŃCZYK4 1 Warsaw Agriculture University, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Science, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Centre for Ecological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Dziekanów Leśny, 05-092 Łomianki, Poland; e-mail (Elżbieta Fuszara): [email protected]; e-mail (Maciej Fuszara): maciek_fuszara@poczta. onet.pl 3 Department of Systematic Zoology, A. Mickiewicz University, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Os. Sobieskiego 26D/142, 60-241 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Received 29 September 2004; Accepted 24 October 2005 A b s t r a c t . In order to identify population trends in Barbastella barbastellus in Poland we summarised results of long-term winter bat counts conducted between 1985 and 2004 in seven of the most important hibernacula of the species. The results show an upward trend in four of the sites while in the remaining four no trend was found. The numbers of barbastelles in Poland seem stable or even increasing. In Central Europe the species is not threatened as seriously as it is in Western Europe. Key words: Barbastella barbastellus, population trends, hibernation, Poland Introduction The barbastelle Barbastella barbastellus is included in the IUCN European endangered spe- cies list in the VU category (H u t s o n et al. 2001). It is also listed in the II and IV annexes of the European Council Directive on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Bats of the Savannah River Site and Vicinity
    United States Department of Agriculture Bats of the Forest Service Savannah River Site and Vicinity Southern Research Station Michael A. Menzel, Jennifer M. Menzel, John C. Kilgo, General Technical Report SRS-68 W. Mark Ford, Timothy C. Carter, and John W. Edwards Authors: Michael A. Menzel,1 Jennifer M. Menzel,2 John C. Kilgo,3 W. Mark Ford,2 Timothy C. Carter,4 and John W. Edwards5 1Graduate Research Assistant, Division of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506; 2Research Wildlife Biologist, Northeastern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Parsons, WV 26287; 3Research Wildlife Biologist, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, New Ellenton, SC 29809; 4Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901; and 5Assistant Professor, Division of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, respectively. Cover photos: Clockwise from top left: big brown bats (photo by John MacGregor); Rafinesque’s big-eared bat (photo by John MacGregor); eastern red bat (photo by John MacGregor); and eastern red bat (photo by Julie Roberge). September 2003 Southern Research Station P.O. Box 2680 Asheville, NC 28802 Bats of the Savannah River Site and Vicinity Michael A. Menzel, Jennifer M. Menzel, John C. Kilgo, W. Mark Ford, Timothy C. Carter, and John W. Edwards Abstract The U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site supports a diverse bat community. Nine species occur there regularly, including the eastern pipistrelle (Pipistrellus subflavus), southeastern myotis (Myotis austroriparius), evening bat (Nycticeius humeralis), Rafinesque’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus rafinesquii), silver-haired bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans), eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis), Seminole bat (L.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessments for Five Forest Bat Species in the Eastern United States
    United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Forest Service Assessments for Five General Technical Report NC-260 Technical Guide Forest Bat Species in the 2006 Eastern United States Front Cover: Illustrations by Fiona Reid, Ontario, Canada ©. Species from top: Pipistrellus subflavus, Myotis leibii, Myotis austroriparius, Myotis septentrionalis, Nycticeius humeralis. United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Forest Service Assessments for Five General Technical Report NC-260 Technical Guide Forest Bat Species in the 2006 Eastern United States Edited by Frank R. Thompson, III Thompson, Frank R., III, ed. 2006. Conservation assessments for five forest bat species in the Eastern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-260. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 82 p. Assesses the status, distribution, conservation, and management considerations for five Regional Forester Sensitive Species of forest bats on national forests in the Eastern United States: eastern pipistrelle, evening bat, southeastern myotis, eastern small-footed myotis, and northern long-eared bat. Includes information on the taxonomy, description, life history, habitat distribution, status, and population biology of each species. KEY WORDS: conservation status, habitat use, life history, Myotis austroriparius (southeastern myotis), Myotis leibii (eastern small-footed myotis), Myotis septentrionalis (northern long-eared bat), Pipistrellus subflavus (eastern pipistrelle), Nycticeius humeralis (evening bat), Region 9, USDA Forest Service Disclaimer The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Bats Inhabiting Arid Steppe Habitats in Central Mongolia Nyambayar Batbayar Mongolian Academy of Sciences, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei Institut für Biologie der Martin-Luther-Universität / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Halle-Wittenberg Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298 2010 A Contribution to the Bats Inhabiting Arid Steppe Habitats in Central Mongolia Nyambayar Batbayar Mongolian Academy of Sciences, [email protected] Ariunbold Jargalsaikhan Mongolian State University of Education, [email protected] Sukhchuluun Gansukh Mongolian Academy of Sciences, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biolmongol Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Sciences Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Other Animal Sciences Commons Batbayar, Nyambayar; Jargalsaikhan, Ariunbold; and Gansukh, Sukhchuluun, "A Contribution to the Bats Inhabiting Arid Steppe Habitats in Central Mongolia" (2010). Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298. 65. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biolmongol/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Institut für Biologie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Copyright 2010, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Wittenberg, Halle (Saale). Used by permission. Erforsch. biol. Ress. Mongolei (Halle/Saale) 2010 (11): 329-340 A contribution to the bats inhabiting arid steppe habitats in central Mongolia B. Nyambayar, J. Ariunbold & G. Sukhchuluun Abstract Bats of the steppe habitat require particular attention in Mongolia because of increasingly frequent droughts and the looming specter of global warming which could have a devastating impact on their population.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Alpine Long-Eared Bat Plecotus Macrobullaris in Serbia
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2016) 40: 984-988 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Short Communication doi:10.3906/zoo-1505-20 The first record of alpine long-eared bat Plecotus macrobullaris in Serbia 1,2, 2 3 4 2,4 Ivana BUDINSKI *, Branko KARAPANDŽA , Vukašin JOSIPOVIĆ , Jelena JOVANOVIĆ , Milan PAUNOVIĆ 1 Department of Genetic Research, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia 2 Wildlife Conservation Society “Mustela”, Belgrade, Serbia 3 Biological Research Society “Josif Pančić”, Belgrade, Serbia 4 Department of Biological Collections, Natural History Museum, Belgrade, Serbia Received: 13.05.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 10.12.2015 Final Version: 06.12.2016 Abstract: An inventory of bat species in the Mileševka river gorge (southwestern Serbia) was conducted in July 2013. There were six bat species recorded in the cave at the Ćetanica plateau using a mist-netting technique. In this paper we report the first finding of Plecotus macrobullaris in Serbia, contributing to the knowledge of its distribution area. The bat fauna of Serbia now contains 30 species. Key words: Plecotus macrobullaris, Serbia, distribution, Ćetanica plateau The members of the genus Plecotus (long-eared bats) Jadovnik mountains slopes are mainly covered with spruce are widely distributed in the Palearctic (Spitzenberger et and subalpine beech forests (Mišić, 1983). The greatest al., 2006), and six European species have been confirmed part of the gorge is covered with thermophilous forests to date. Phylogenetic analyses revealed the existence of two and shrublands, while mesophilous beech, beech–spruce– major lineages of long-eared bats in Europe: the ‘auritus fir, and even chestnut forests are found at lower elevations group’ (P.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Bat Species in Mongolia
    Cave bat species in Mongolia Ariunbold Jargalsaikhan Department of Biology, School of Mathematic and Natural Science, Mongolian National University of Education. [email protected] +976 99192925 Introduction Total of 19 bat species were recorded in Mongolia and most of them are resident species. A few them are migrant bat species, but never studied before migration of the bat species. There are about 1000 caves in Mongolia and 200 of them considered larger caves in size. Our recent study was determined hibernating places of migrant bat species. In Mongolia, there is almost no studies have been reported about biology of caves; however, Germany researcher M.Stubbe is recorded and ringed an Eastern water bat from cave Havtsal near Chono Kharaikh river in 1977. Our recent studies Ognev’s long-eared bat are recorded 10 species of bats from 14 caves. Conditions of Khevtee bosoo cave Hibernating and habitat conditions of bats, Hibernating and habitat conditions of Steppe environment of Khuit cave Methods whiskered bat, environment of Shar khanan cave In winter time, we have been searched for bats in gaps of walls, clump and ceiling of caves with flash light, and in summer time, just walk in cave and searched for bats and also closing the cave entrance and captured with mist net. All morphometrics of bats were measured and released after ringed the bats. Results and Conclusion The bat species were hibernated Dayandeerkhi, Khuit and Soogt in northern region, and also Tsagaandel, Shar khanan, Taliin agui in the southern region of Mongolia. Soogt cave is 72 m deep vertical shaped (Avirmed, 2008) and Ognev’s long-eared bat (Plecotus ognevi) hibernates there.
    [Show full text]