DOCSLIB.ORG

Literature Review Memo [Clean Slate IA – Levels of Bargaining]*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Literature Review Memo [Clean Slate IA – Levels of Bargaining]* Rebalancing Economic and Political Power: A Clean Slate for the Future of American Labor Law Literature Review Memo [Clean Slate IA – Levels of Bargaining]* Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 2 2. The Problem ................................................................................................................................. 4 3. U.S. Historical and Industry-Specific Parallels ............................................................................. 8 4. Supply Chain Bargaining ............................................................................................................ 15 5. Synthesis of International Sectoral Bargaining Models ............................................................... 22 6. Case Study: Mechanics of Sectoral Bargaining in Norway and South Africa ............................... 34 7. Survey of Bargaining Schemes Abroad ....................................................................................... 43 * This report was researched and drafted by Jared Odessky and Will Dobbs-Allsop in consultation with, and with contributions from, members of the Clean Slate IA group. 1 Research Draft prepared for Clean Slate Project - Not for Circulation, Citation, or Attribution 1. Introduction The overall mission of “Clean Slate” is to increase worker power in the United States. To achieve that mission, it is essential to extend collective bargaining coverage, now at the low end of industrial democracies. Over the last 65 years, U.S. private sector collective bargaining coverage has decreased from 35% to 6%. While public sector coverage has increased to 30%, it remains at the low end compared to other nations—and is under threat in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Janus. A legal system in which working people can gain a right to bargain only at the enterprise level is a significant cause—perhaps the most significant cause—of employer opposition to organizing and intransigence in collective bargaining in the U.S. Each employer fears that if its employees organize, it will be placed at a competitive disadvantage by the results of collective bargaining. This intransigence has been abetted by the financial markets and management compensation schemes that discount long term economic performance and social responsibilities, as well as by global product and labor markets. A persistent aspiration of the labor movement has been to “take wages out of competition.” In other words, the labor movement seeks to prevent employers from competing by cutting wages or benefits or worsening working conditions. In a market economy, unless unions can take wages out of competition, there will be steady downward pressure on wages and benefits and employers will resist efforts to raise economic standards and working conditions, particularly through enterprise-level collective bargaining. Stable collective bargaining leading to rising wages and expanded benefits and job security has existed in the U.S. when unions have found mechanisms to take wages out of competition. Historically these mechanisms have been multi-employer bargaining and pattern bargaining. More recently, unions have sought to use master agreements, common expiration dates, “trigger agreements” (agreements conditioning application of economic terms on reaching a set percentage of signatories in a geographic market), and the revival of tripartite wage boards (leading to government-mandated minimum or living wages). In other counties, particularly Western Europe, bargaining has historically taken place at a “higher” level, both national and sectoral. In some of these countries, collectively bargaining agreements are “extended” across a sector when specified conditions are met. The key question for our group is what are the legal mechanisms that would facilitate a form of collective bargaining that would effectively take wages out of competition and permit working people in the U.S. to organize, have stable representation, and effectively improve wages, benefits and working conditions for all workers? More specifically, we will investigate: • In what countries and historical time periods have bargaining systems been most successful, when, and by what metrics? What models have achieved the greatest collective bargaining coverage and expanded worker power in the economy and in politics? What historical factors enabled the establishment of sectoral or other higher-level bargaining bargaining? 2 Research Draft prepared for Clean Slate Project - Not for Circulation, Citation, or Attribution • How have structural characteristics—including fissuring, precariousness, isolation of workers, lack of a single physical worksite, and globalization—posed a barrier to successful collective bargaining? • How did law historically facilitate or inhibit sectoral or supply chain bargaining in the U.S.? • How has composition of the workforce (race, national origin, immigration status, gender) posed a barrier to successful collective bargaining in the United States? [NB: Possibly for another group]. In countries where sectoral bargaining exists: • To what extent does the law mandate such bargaining? To what extent is the government involved in facilitating or mandating bargaining, or in extending the fruits of bargaining? • Who represents workers in bargaining? Who represents employers? Who decides? How are nonunion workers represented? • How are sectors defined? Who decides? What sectors are covered? What mechanisms exist to make bargaining inclusive of all sectors? • What bargaining occurs at national level, regional level, sectoral level, or worksite level? That is, who participates in the different levels of bargaining and what subjects are bargained over at each level? How does sectoral bargaining interact with worksite bargaining? • Where has supply chain bargaining been achieved? What legal mechanisms can encourage or require it? How does it interact with sectoral or worksite bargaining? • What other reforms aimed at increasing workers’ collective economic power, including organizing rights and strike rights, are need in order for higher levels of bargaining to succeed? 3 Research Draft prepared for Clean Slate Project - Not for Circulation, Citation, or Attribution 2. The Problem “As an increasing number of scholars and commentators have recently argued, worksite-or firm- based bargaining is often insufficient to protect workers’ interests and to redress problems of economic and political inequality.”1 Enterprise collective bargaining in the United States has contributed to some of the structural failures that plague the larger labor law regime: ● Distributional effects: Firm- and enterprise-based bargaining incentivizes companies to “compete to keep labor costs down, whether by setting wages at a low level, skirting legal obligations, or avoiding unionization.”2 ● Workplace democracy: Worksite-level bargaining can provide workers a voice at work, but it also limits worker-voice. “Non-unionized workers typically have no way to participate in decisions around wages and benefits or other questions important to their daily lives … even unionized workers are outmatched against continental-scale corporations.”3 ● Policy alternatives: Administrative substitutes to large-scale collective bargaining, such as “federal and state minimum standards laws, are fairly blunt tools, as they impose identical obligations on nearly all covered companies.”4 They have proved hard to adjust and do not account for differences across industries or, in the case of the federal minimum wage, geographic region. ● Outsourcing & diffused supply chains: “Firm-level bargaining has become even less effective in recent years as companies have contracted out work and directly employed fewer people.”5 “Work that was once done in-house is increasingly scattered across multiple employers interconnected by a chain or network of contracts. This disintegration … has many baleful consequences, including the swelling of the precarious, low-wage labor market.”6 One solution to these problems is for the U.S. to transition to some type of sectoral bargaining system, whereby workers negotiate at the “at the sectoral level—for example, among all fast food workers, all retail workers, all hotel/motel workers, all janitors—either nationally or in a given 1 KATE ANDRIAS AND BRISHEN ROGERS, REBUILDING WORKER VOICE IN TODAY’S ECONOMY 26 (The Roosevelt Inst. 2018), https://www.scribd.com/document/385584703/Rebuilding-Worker-Voices-In- Today-s-Economy#download&from_embed. 2 Id. 3 Id. at 27. 4 Id. 5 David Madland, Wage Boards for American Workers, CTR. FOR AMER. PROGRESS (last updated Apr. 9, 2018), https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2018/04/09/448515/wage-boards-american- workers/. 6 MARK BARENBERG, WIDENING THE SCOPE OF WORKER POWER 3 (The Roosevelt Inst. 2015), http://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Widening-the-Scope-of-Worker- Organizing.pdf. 4 Research Draft prepared for Clean Slate Project - Not for Circulation, Citation, or Attribution geographic region.”7 There are a few mechanisms scattered throughout U.S. labor law that enable workers to organize at a scale larger than workplace-by-workplace, but in practice these tools have been rarely used or have largely proved to be unworkable. For example, in theory multi-employer bargaining is possible, but multi-employer bargaining typically requires the assent of the companies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Labour University Online Academy Global
    GLOBAL LABOUR UNIVERSITY GLOBAL LABOUR UNIVERSITY GLOBAL LABOUR UNIVERSITY The Global Labour University (GLU) offers the following qualification and networking programmes: MEETING THE MEETING THE Masters Programmes CHALLENGE CHALLENGE The GLU offers Masters Programmes in Brazil, Germany, Katheder Andrea Photo: India, the USA and South Africa. Internships with Global OF GLOBALISATION OF GLOBALISATION Unions, the ILO and trade union organisations provide The Global Labour University (GLU) is a network of trade practical insights into polices and initiatives for the unions, universities, the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and the implementation of labour rights worldwide. International Labour Organisation (ILO) to deliver high- level qualification programmes. ENGAGE Programme At the University of the Witswatersrand in South Africa, In the context of globalization, freedom of association, the GLU offers a 7-weeks certified leadership training collective bargaining, wages and issues such as social programme. inequality, informal and precarious work, global economic policies and climate change provide challenges and chanc- Global Labour Column es for trade unions and labour activists. The Global Labour Column publishes short online analyses by scholars, activists and unionists on current The Global Labour University offers a wide range of issues. It has a readership of over 10,000. qualification and networking programmes with an empha- sis on policy and practice to qualify trade unionists and Alumni network labour activists to respond to these challenges. The GLU alumni network comprises over 500 graduates from more than 70 countries. More than 80 % of the graduates have stayed with the trade union movement or are working as researchers or legal consultants on labour issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary Trade unions and the global crisis Labour’s visions, strategies and responses Edited by Melisa Serrano, Edlira Xhafa and Michael Fichter Within three years of the outbreak of the latest global financial crisis, the economic mood appears to have gone back to business as usual. Little has been done to address the root causes of the crisis; indeed, after a short revival of corporatist social dialogue in some countries, more workers are being pushed into precarious employment, and austerity packages are making working people, their families and pensioners pay for the crisis. This collection of essays looks at how labour can respond to the existing highly unequal, crisis-prone and unsustainable world economic order. Bringing the views of activists and researchers from the trade union movement together with those of academics, the varied contributions range from short-term strategies and actions to medium and long-term policies, and to alternative visions and discourses that challenge the current development paradigm. The authors also take an unflinching look at the labour movement itself, discussing its successes and failures during the crisis and proposing strategies for change. There are three main threads of argument in this volume, reflected in the three parts into which it is divided. The first takes a broad perspective, challenging the mainstream analysis of the impact of the crisis on labour and proposing possible alternatives, either specifically to address the crisis or to embark on a more transformational project beyond the logic of the prevailing capitalist orthodoxy. The five chapters here provide alternative narratives and challenge mainstream discourses on the nature of the crisis and its impact on labour by pointing out the basic structural deficits of the dominant economic order and exploring Trade unions and the global crisis • ISBN 978-92-2-124926-9 fundamental options.
    [Show full text]
  • The Office of Cooperation Geneva Seminar
    THE OFFICE OF COOPERATION GENEVA SEMINAR The Hans-Böckler Stiftung (Werner Fiedler, Department of Study Promotion, head of the unit for PhD scholarships) (http://www.boeckler.de/index.htm) in collaboration with the Office of Cooperation RUB/IMU (Manfred Wannöffel, Managing Director) initiated a research and familiarization seminar for twelve scholar students programmed for bachelor’s, master’s and doctorate’s degrees drawn from universities in England and Germany. The 5-day seminar on the contents, institutions and challenges of Global Labour regulations started from Monday the 9th of September, 2013 and ended on Friday 13th September, 2013 in the Switzerland city of Geneva. The seminar was well coordinated by Frank Hoffer (ILO), Joyce Abebrese, a final year master’s student at the Ruhr-University of Bochum and was assisted by an intern from the Global Labour University (Berlin School of Economics and Law) Emmanuel Allotey, working with the Office of Cooperation. The overall purpose of the seminar was to illustrate the linkages between national unions, Global Union Federations and other international organizations depending on different networks within the country and cross-borders to promote workers’ rights. The seminar was tailored to meet the aspirations of the participants as to workings of these organizations, at the same time served as a mechanism to educate them about the roles these institutions play in the sphere of work and labour and how to merge these bodies in the field of academic research in the global perspective. The programme was segmented into four parts, and dealt with issues on the following: 1. Overview and introduction of Global Labour.
    [Show full text]
  • Curbing Precarious Informal Employment and Bonded Labour in the Agriculture Sector of Nepal: GEFONT's Initiative to Liberate Kamaiyas
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Rimal, Bishnu Working Paper Curbing precarious informal employment and bonded labour in the agriculture sector of Nepal: GEFONT's initiative to liberate Kamaiyas Global Labour University Working Paper, No. 57 Provided in Cooperation with: The Global Labour University (GLU) Suggested Citation: Rimal, Bishnu (2019) : Curbing precarious informal employment and bonded labour in the agriculture sector of Nepal: GEFONT's initiative to liberate Kamaiyas, Global Labour University Working Paper, No. 57, International Labour Organization (ILO), Geneva This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/206727 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available
    [Show full text]
  • CGWR and the Global Labour University
    We are a Center! On December 1, 2012, the College of the Liberal Arts formally promoted us from a project to a research center. We are now the Center for Global Workers’ Rights (CGWR) at Penn State University. In the spring 2013 semester, the CGWR is looking forward to hosting more speakers, organizing an international workshop with US and international unionists to discuss the Global Labour University, and holding a major scholar-practitioner international symposium on precarious work. In addition, the CGWR will facilitate a series of initiatives for students, faculty, and practitioners designed to promote global workers’ rights. And with the goal of increasing the impact of our research, the CGWR will continue to partner with other universities, labor unions, and NGOs to produce action-oriented research projects on topics such as workers’ rights in Colombia and El Salvador. Brick worker in Bangladesh; Write us if you have any thoughts or questions about the CGWR’s work photo by Arifur Rahman and join our listserv in order to stay on top of the latest events: <[email protected]>. Visit our website http://lser.la.psu.edu/gwr/. Or, find us on Facebook: "The Penn State Center for Global Workers' Rights." CGWR and the Global Labour University In order to further encourage the study of global workers’ rights, the CGWR has initiated a relationship with the Global Labour University (GLU). GLU is a network of universities that offer Master’s degrees in labor and globalization. GLU students are mid-career labor unionists or practitioners. Through the program, students gain knowledge of international labor standards and trade unions, sustainable development, social justice, and global institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • XV Global Labour University Conference Building a Post-Pandemic World of Work with Social Justice
    XV Global Labour University Conference Building a Post-Pandemic World of Work with Social Justice Penn State University and AFL-CIO Washington D.C. March 30 – April 1, 2022 Call for papers and presentations The Covid-19 pandemic, right-wing populism, and rising authoritarianism have changed the world of work. Millions are unemployed. Many face malnutrition. Women, migrants, people of colour, and youth have all been disproportionately affected. Some signs of change are emerging. Covid vaccines have been developed and are being distributed, albeit very unevenly. And four years of right-wing populism’s grip on the US government has come to an end. Yet, deeper social transformation will require organizing and mobilizing. And it remains to be seen whether other right-wing populist regimes will change. The question going forward is how we build anew our workplaces and societies based on social justice. What should a new social contract entail? How do we end gender-based violence and racism at work? What is needed to ensure worker organizing for a just transition? How do we organize workers within and across the platform economy? How might we build a more just global economy for supply chain and migrant workers? Finally, how can academics and trade unionists work more effectively together through research and campaigns? To help answer these questions, we call on paper and presentation proposals in seven themes. For all these topics, we consider informality, precarious work, migration, and Covid-19 as cross cutting issues. 1. More Inclusive Social Protection, and Sustainable Development . The Covid-19 pandemic has made abundantly clear the failure of social protection schemes across the globe, as fired workers receive inadequate income security and families face growing food insecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary of the Title
    Executive Summary Don’t waste the crisis: Critical perspectives for a new economic model Edited by Nicolas Pons-Vignon A crisis means hardship, the loss of income and the loss of jobs. It also, however, provides a moment for reflection and deliberation on why the crisis happened and what needs to change. The essays collected in Don’t waste the crisis make a critical and passionate contribution to a new economic and social model that draws lessons from the current global financial and economic crisis. The authors – from academia, international organizations and trade unions – present a rich diversity of perspectives and a wide spectrum of critical analyses and recommendations. A number of authors in the collection advocate a public investment and wage- led recovery, emphasizing the fact that the crisis happened in the wake of years of lower taxation for the rich and a decoupling of productivity growth and wage increases. They assert that a rebalancing of economies necessitates a functional wage policy that ensures sufficient levels of internal aggregate demand based on real income. Across-the-board wage moderation carries the high risk of a competitive race to the bottom, with hugely negative impacts on demand and overall price levels. This could drive the world economy into the deflationary trap experienced by several Asian countries in the 1990s. The measures endorsed by the ILO Global Jobs Pact – a minimum wage, stronger collective bargaining institutions, comprehensive social security provisions and labour clauses in public procurement, public investment and public employment – are important policy tools for reversing the wage slide. Don’t waste the crisis • ISBN 978-92-2-123442-5 No national strategy will be sustainable if global finance is not profoundly reformed by limiting speculation while at the same time reorienting investment to productive activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis on Union Revitalisation in the Global South
    The Global Labour University University of Kassel Berlin School of Economics and Law Comparative Analysis on Union Revitalisation in the Global South - Case Studies of the Central Ú nicados Trabalhadores (CUT), the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) and the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) Submitted by: Changgeun Lee Student Number: 352732 Master’s Thesis In partial fulfillment for the degree of “Master of Arts” Labour Policies and Globalisation (LPG) Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Rob Lambert Prof. Dr. Michael Fichter 15 September 2010 - Berlin - 1 Abstract This study is aimed at examining and comparing revitalisation activities conducted by the three Southern unions labelled as social movement unionism (SMU) such as the Central Ú nicados Trabalhadores (CUT) from Brazil, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) and the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU). This study raises some theoretical issues such as the weakness of ‘multi-dimensional approach’, relationship between revitalisation and trade union power resources, and the relationship between union ideological identity and movement/organisational identity. In the main chapters, dominant forms of strategies conducted by the three Southern unions along four revitalisation dimensions such as membership, economic, political and institutional vitality are presented with comparative analysis using four factors: socio/economic change, political and industrial relations institutions, employers and state’s strategy and union identity. This study reaffirms that union’s strategic choice is influenced not only by external environments but by internal dynamics including union identity and leadership. In particular, this study cases demonstrates that strong tradition of SMU which has still remained has had considerable impact on union’s strategic choice, even though they are operating in different external environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Closing the Representation Gap in Micro and Small Enterprises
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Serrano, Melisa; Xhafa, Edlira; Webster, Edward; Bischoff, Christine Working Paper Strategies for closing the representation gap in micro and small enterprises Global Labour University Working Paper, No. 10 Provided in Cooperation with: The Global Labour University (GLU) Suggested Citation: Serrano, Melisa; Xhafa, Edlira; Webster, Edward; Bischoff, Christine (2010) : Strategies for closing the representation gap in micro and small enterprises, Global Labour University Working Paper, No. 10, ISBN 9789221238164, International Labour Organization (ILO), Geneva This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/96390 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculm Vitae
    MARK S. ANNER 501F Keller Building The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 [email protected] (October 2020) EDUCATION Ph.D., Government, Cornell University August 2004 M.A., Government, Cornell University May 2001 M.A., Latin American Studies, Stanford University July 1991 B.A., Political Science, Tufts University (Magna Cum Laude) May 1985 TEACHING FIELDS AND RESEARCH INTERESTS International and Comparative Employment Relations Corporate Social Responsibility Latin America, Vietnam, Bangladesh, India Apparel Industry Global Supply Chains Workers’ Rights ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Professor, Labor and Employment Relations, and Political 2020-present Science, Penn State University. Associate Professor, Labor and Employment Relations, and Political 2012-2020 Science, Penn State University. Assistant Professor, Labor Studies and Employment Relations, and Political 2005-2012 Science. Penn State University Visiting Assistant Professor, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Spring 2005 Cornell University. Lecturer, Department of Government, Cornell University. Fall 2004 ADMINSTRATIVE POSITIONS Founding Director, Center for Global Workers’ Rights, Penn State University 2012-present Founding Director, MPS in Labor and Global Workers’ Rights, Penn State 2014-present University (part of the Global Labour University network) Co-chair, Latin American Studies program, Penn State University 2012-2014 NOTABLE AWARDS AND DISTINCTIONS Susan C. Eaton Outstanding Scholar-Practitioner Award, Labor and Employment 2019 Relations Association (LERA). Advancing a Global Penn State: Outstanding International Research Award 2019 (inaugural recipient) Liberal Arts Researcher Appreciation Award for Fifth Grant at Penn State 2018 Liberal Arts Researcher Appreciation Award, Six Years External Funding, Penn State. 2017 James G. Scoville International/Comparative Best Paper Award, Labor and 2013 Employment Relations Association (LERA). Luis Aparicio Emerging Scholar Prize, International Labour and Employment 2012 Relations Association (ILERA).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Economic Meltdown
    Contents About the Editor/Contributors . 7 Foreword . 11 Introduction . 17 1. The Global Financial Crisis and India JAYSHREE SENGUPTA . 21 2. India after the Global Economic Crisis M.K. VENU . 51 3. Organic Crisis and Capitalist Transformation MARIO CANDEIAS . 67 4. Currency War versus Monetary Cooperation FABIO DE MASI . 91 5. From the Great Recession to Deflation and Stagnation HANSJORG HERR . 105 6. Current Crises, European Union: Alternatives and the Idea of Socioecological Reconstruction of a Society beyond Neoliberalism and Capitalism JUDITH DELLHEIM . 113 6 THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC MELTDOWN 7. Europe: To Be or Not to Be FABIO DE MASI . 125 8. From Exportism and Growth Fetish towards an Ecosocialist ‘Economy of Reproduction’ MARIO CANDEIAS . 141 9. Deconstructing India’s Inclusive Development Agenda SAMIR SARAN AND VIVAN SHARAN . 147 About the Editor/Contributors Editor: Jayshree Sengupta is a Senior Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), Delhi, India. She was a consultant for World Bank (1985- 1990) and OECD (Paris) (1991). She coauthored a book with Prof S. Sideri of ISS (Hague) on The 1992 Single European Market and The Third World (Frank Cass, London, 1992). She was a lecturer at Miranda House and Indraprastha College (Delhi University) from 1970 to 1977. She has also served as the Programme Coordinator at Indian Council for International Economic Relations (ICRIER) from 1981-1985. She had studied at the London School of Economics, where she completed MSc (Economics) and M Phil (Economics). Contributors: Mario Candeias is the Co-Director of the Institute for Critical Social Analysis at the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation. He is also on the editorial board of the reviews ‘Luxemburg’ and ‘Das Argument’.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Report NEW En.Indd
    Trade and industrial policy: implications for development and international labour standards Acknowledgement I appreciate the research team led by the lead researchers Prof. Dr. Hansjörg Herr of Berlin School of Economics and Law and Prof. Dr. Christoph Scherrer of University of Kassel and Global Labour University and researchers who wrote the regional chapters Dr. Kwabena Nyarko Otoo (Trades Union Congress, Ghana) and Prof. William Baah-Boateng (University of Ghana), Prof. Dr. Bruno De Conti of University of Campinas (Brazil), Prof. Dr. Praveen Jha and Meghna Goyal of Jawaharlal Nehru University (India) and Dr. Ismail Karatepe of University of Kassel for this important study. The role of Gopalakrishnan Manicandan, IndustriALL South Asia Research and Communication Officer, as research coordinator / organizer for this study is acknowledged. Study for IndustriALL Global Union Hansjörg Herr, Christoph Scherrer, William Baah-Boateng, Bruno de Conti, Meghna Goyal, Praveen Jha, Ismail Doga Karatepe, Kwabena Nyarko Otoo, Arthur Welle Contact: [email protected] and [email protected] TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL POLICY: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS Content Foreword 4 Global trends and the need for industrial policy Hansjörg Herr and Christoph Scherrer 5 Africa: industrialization, trade and investment policy and workers’ rights Kwabena Nyarko Otoo and William Baah-Boateng 10 Latin America and the Caribbean: industrialization, trade and investment policy and workers’ rights Bruno De Conti and Arthur Welle 16 Asia
    [Show full text]