DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Improving Household Food Security and Nutrition in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Improving Household Food Security and Nutrition in The Evaluation of Improving Household Food Security and Nutrition in the Luapula Valley Project (IHFSAN) Report of the Evaluation Mission November 2001 Preface The following draft report represents the views of the independent evaluation mission on the performance and achievements of the IHFSAN (Improving Household Food Security and Nutrition in the Luapula Valley) project. The evaluation was initiated with a view to providing the donor, collaborating agencies and FAO with an independent and objective assessment of the current status of implementation of the project, including a review of problems faced. The mission started on 16 September 2001 and ended on 5 October 2001; nine communities involved in the IHFSAN project were visited and numerous collaborators at field, district and provincial level were met. In addition, the mission visited relevant offices in Lusaka. The evaluation was a challenging task given the complex history of the project, the amount of reports, correspondence etc. produced, as well as the relative scarcity of information available on the project’s outcomes and impact. The evaluation mission is most appreciative of the efforts made by the staff and management of IHFSAN, the GRZ officers in the districts visited, and the FAO representation, as well as a range of other individuals who provided information and discussed issues in a frank and constructive manner. The community groups met provided valuable insights and always gave a warm welcome to the mission. In the districts, brainstorming sessions were organized with district officers and Community Support Staff (CSS), which produced sometimes surprising results. The draft report has also benefited from briefings and discussions with ESNP (nutrition), AGPC (crop production) and AGSM (marketing and rural finance) staff members at FAO headquarters in Rome. The IHFSAN Evaluation Mission Bernd Bultemeier, Evaluation Service, FAO, Rome Margaret McEwan, Independent Consultant, Lusaka Crispin Chanda, Department of Field Services, MAFF, Lusaka Mukelabai Ndiyoi, FASAZ, Lusaka Table of Contents PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................ I TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF ACRONYMS............................................................................................................................................ IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................ VI CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................... VIII GOVERNMENT SPHERE ......................................................................................................................................... VIII Government involvement.............................................................................................................................. viii Government funding ..................................................................................................................................... viii Working arrangements.................................................................................................................................. viii PROJECT SPHERE ................................................................................................................................................ VIII Project documents ........................................................................................................................................ viii Project supervisory arrangements ..................................................................................................................ix Technical backstopping ..................................................................................................................................ix Operational backstopping ...............................................................................................................................ix Reporting and M&E arrangements .................................................................................................................ix Project management........................................................................................................................................x RESULTS SPHERE ................................................................................................................................................... X Community Action Plans..................................................................................................................................x Community Development Fund (CDF)............................................................................................................xi Micro projects .................................................................................................................................................xi Empowerment.................................................................................................................................................xi Improved food production and availability......................................................................................................xii Household-level knowledge and practices related to dietary intake and nutrition.........................................xiv Vulnerable groups......................................................................................................................................... xiv Gender sensitivity ..........................................................................................................................................xv Better understanding by CSS of food security, nutrition and other issues .....................................................xv Improved access to, and quality of, health care within the communities........................................................xv THE WAY FORWARD .............................................................................................................................................. XVI Consolidation of results and preparation of follow-up ...................................................................................xvi 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1 2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN........................................................................................................ 1 2.1 INDICATORS , ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS ............................................................................................................ 2 2.2 BENEFICIARIES .............................................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 2 3. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS ...................................................................................................... 3 3.1 PROJECT BUDGET AND EXPENDITURE .............................................................................................................. 3 3.2 ACTIVITIES AND OUTPUTS ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2.1 Increased year-round food production of specific oil crops, staple crops, fruits and vegetables........ 4 3.2.2 Improved food availability and decreased seasonal variation through the introduction of appropriate storage, processing, preservation and preparation techniques and practices ................................................ 7 3.2.3 Communities empowered to ensure household food security and adequate nutrition for the most vulnerable (includes ALF objectives 1, 2, 6, 9) ............................................................................................... 8 3.2.4 Local knowledge base of communities, extension and other support services strengthened towards improved household food security and nutrition (includes ALF objectives 7, 10).......................................... 10 3.2.5 System of sustainable participatory monitoring and evaluation established .................................... 12 3.2.6 Improved access to and quality of health care within the communities presently served by the project (includes ALF objective 8 – see also section on health and nutrition knowledge above) ..................... 12 4. GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT, TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL BACKSTOPPING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 13 4.2 TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL BACKSTOPPING ............................................................................................... 13 4.3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................... 14 5. ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL RESULTS ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ZAMBIA HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT 1 January to 30 June 2018
    UNICEF ZAMBIA HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT 1 January to 30 June 2018 Zambia Humanitarian Situation Report ©UNICEF Zambia/2017/Ayisi ©UNICEF REPORTING PERIOD: JANUARY - JUNE 2018 SITUATION IN NUMBERS Highlights 15,425 # of registered refugees in Nchelengue • As of 28 June 2018, a total of 15,425 refugees from the district Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) were registered at (UNHCR, Infographic 28 June 2018) Kenani transit centre in the Luapula Province of Zambia. • UNICEF and partners are supporting the Government of Zambia 79% to provide life-saving services for all the refugees in Kenani of registered refugees are women and transit centre and in the Mantapala permanent settlement area. children • More than half of the refugees have been relocated to Mantapala permanent settlement area. 25,000 • The set-up of basic services in Mantapala is drastically delayed # of expected new refugees from DRC in due to heavy rainfall that has made access roads impassable. Nchelengue District in 2018 • Discussions between UNICEF and the Government are under way to develop a transition and sustainability plan to ensure the US$ 8.8 million continuity of services in refugee hosting areas. UNICEF funding requirement UNICEF’s Response with Partners Funding Status 2018 UNICEF Sector Carry- forward Total Total amount: UNICEF Sector $0.2 m Funds received current Target Results* Target year: $2.5 m Results* Nutrition: # of children admitted for SAM 400 273 400 273 treatment Health: # of children vaccinated against 11,875 6,690 11,875 6,690 measles WASH: # of people provided with access to 15,000 9,253 25,000 15,425 Funding Gap: $6.1 m safe water =68% Child Protection: # of children receiving 5,500 3,657 9,000 4,668 psychosocial and/or other protection services Funds available include funding received for the current year as well as the carry-forward from the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Complementary Foods Recipe Booklet
    National Food and Government of the Nutrition Commission Republic of Zambia Improved Complementary Foods Recipe Booklet Family Foods for Breastfed Children in Zambia Technical collaboration and financial support by Financial support for printing was provided by UNICEF, Zambia Improved Complementary Foods Recipe Booklet Family Foods for Breastfed Children in Zambia Lusaka, Zambia 2007 Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion what- soever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. National Food and Nutrition Commission, Government of the Republic of Zambia and The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2007 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copy- right holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Publishing Management Service, Information Di- vision, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to [email protected] and to The Director, National Food and Nutrition Commission, Plot No. 5112, Lumumba Road, P.O. Box 32669, Lusaka, Zambia ISBN 9982-54-005-X Acknowledgements The recipes in this booklet were developed and field-tested in Luapula Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Gap Between Household Demand and Community Water Supply?
    KUMAMARU, SMOUT & ODHIAMBO 35th WEDC International Conference, Loughborough, UK, 2011 THE FUTURE OF WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE: INNOVATION, ADAPTATION AND ENGAGEMENT IN A CHANGING WORLD Self-supply: bridging the gap between household demand and community water supply? K. Kumamaru, I. Smout & F. Odhiambo REFEREED PAPER 1089 This paper discusses rural water supply at grassroots level, and challenges the assumption that a community water supply facility is the only solution for rural water supply, especially in sparsely populated areas. A comparison is made between two water service models from case studies in Zambia: those with conventional communal water supplies and Self Supply models. Findings revealed that a Self Supply service could significantly reduce faecal contamination risk in water quality and deliver higher per capita water use and better convenience of access than conventional supply, yet its reliability regarding water source dry up requires to be monitored. A conventional community-based water service may not fulfil the households’ demand due to the nature of community ownership and the distance from household to a community water facility. Since the underlying service delivery models are different, an integrated approach is required for a rural water supply strategy and national policy. Introduction The priority for sustainable rural water supplies has changed from „providing the physical systems‟ to „delivering the water service‟ over the past few decades. The water sector generates a lot of analyses on costs, designs, post-construction supports, management models, efficiency and sustainability of supplies but these are mostly for conventional communal supply service models (Sutton 2010b). The term „community‟ has no single definition but varies in the context of different view points from the place in which people live, to groups of population, culture, religion and history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Honey in Zambia the Case
    Small-scale with outstanding economic potential enterprises woodland-based In some countries, honey and beeswax are so important the term ‘beekeeping’ appears in the titles of some government ministries. The significance of honey and beeswax in local livelihoods is nowhere more apparent than in the Miombo woodlands of southern Africa. Bee-keeping is a vital source of income for many poor and remote rural producers throughout the Miombo, often because it is highly suited to small scale farming. This detailed Non-Timber Forest Product study from Zambia examines beekeeping’s livelihood role from a range of perspectives, including market factors, production methods and measures for harnessing beekeeping to help reduce poverty. The caseThe in Zambia of honey ISBN 979-24-4673-7 Small-scale woodland-based enterprises with outstanding economic potential 9 789792 446739 The case of honey in Zambia G. Mickels-Kokwe G. Mickels-Kokwe Small-scale woodland-based enterprises with outstanding economic potential The case of honey in Zambia G. Mickels-Kokwe National Library of Indonesia Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mickels-Kokwe, G. Small-scale woodland-based enterprises with outstanding economic potential: the case of honey in Zambia/by G. Mickels-Kokwe. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), 2006. ISBN 979-24-4673-7 82p. CABI thesaurus: 1. small businesses 2. honey 3. beekeeping 4. commercial beekeeping 5. non- timber forest products 6. production 7. processing 8. trade 9.government policy 10. woodlands 11. case studies 12. Zambia I. Title © 2006 by CIFOR All rights reserved. Published in 2006 Printed by Subur Printing, Jakarta Design and Layout by Catur Wahyu and Eko Prianto Cover photo by Mercy Mwape of the Forestry Department of Zambia Published by Center for International Forestry Research Jl.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia USADF Country Portfolio
    Zambia USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program established in 1984 and reopened in U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: Keepers Zambia 2004. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 23 projects and one Country Program Coordinator: Guy Kahokola Foundation (KZF) Cooperative Agreement. Total active commitment is $2.9 million. Suite 103 Foxdale Court Office Park Program Manager: Victor Makasa Agricultural investments total $2.6 million. Youth-led enterprise 609 Zambezi Road, Roma Tel: +260 211 293333 investments total $20,000. Lusaka, Zambia Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on support to agricultural enterprises, including organic farming as Zambia has been identified as a Feed the Future country. In addition, there are investments in off-grid energy and youth led-enterprises. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Mongu Dairy Cooperative Society 2012-2017 $152,381 Sector: Agriculture (Dairy) Limited Town/City: Mongu District in the Western Province 2705-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to increase the production and sales of milk through the purchase of improved breed cows, transportation, and storage equipment. Chibusa Home Based Care 2013-2018 $187,789 Sector: Agriculture (Food Processing) Association Town/City: Mungwi District in the Northern Province of Zambia 2925-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to provide working capital for purchasing grains, increase milling capacity, build a storage warehouse, and provide funds to improve marketing. Ushaa Area Farmers Association 2013-2018 $94,960 Sector: Agriculture (Rice) Limited Town/City: Mongu District in the Western Province of Zambia 2937-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to provide working capital for purchasing rice, build a storage warehouse, and provide funds to improve marketing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ecology of a Small-Scale Fishery, Mweru-Luapula, Zambia
    Managing inequality: the political ecology of a small-scale fishery, Mweru-Luapula, Zambia Bram Verelst1 University of Ghent, Belgium 1. Introduction Many scholars assume that most small-scale inland fishery communities represent the poorest sections of rural societies (Béné 2003). This claim is often argued through what Béné calls the "old paradigm" on poverty in inland fisheries: poverty is associated with natural factors including the ecological effects of high catch rates and exploitation levels. The view of inland fishing communities as the "poorest of the poorest" does not imply directly that fishing automatically lead to poverty, but it is linked to the nature of many inland fishing areas as a common-pool resources (CPRs) (Gordon 2005). According to this paradigm, a common and open-access property resource is incapable of sustaining increasing exploitation levels caused by horizontal effects (e.g. population pressure) and vertical intensification (e.g. technological improvement) (Brox 1990 in Jul-Larsen et al. 2003; Kapasa, Malasha and Wilson 2005). The gradual exhaustion of fisheries due to "Malthusian" overfishing was identified by H. Scott Gordon (1954) and called the "tragedy of the commons" by Hardin (1968). This influential model explains that whenever individuals use a resource in common – without any form of regulation or restriction – this will inevitably lead to its environmental degradation. This link is exemplified by the prisoner's dilemma game where individual actors, by rationally following their self-interest, will eventually deplete a shared resource, which is ultimately against the interest of each actor involved (Haller and Merten 2008; Ostrom 1990). Summarized, the model argues that the open-access nature of a fisheries resource will unavoidably lead to its overexploitation (Kraan 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • FORM #3 Grants Solicitation and Management Quarterly
    FORM #3 Grants Solicitation and Management Quarterly Progress Report Grantee Name: Maternal and Child Survival Program Grant Number: # AID-OAA-A-14-00028 Primary contact person regarding this report: Mira Thompson ([email protected]) Reporting for the quarter Period: Year 3, Quarter 1 (October –December 2018) 1. Briefly describe any significant highlights/accomplishments that took place during this reporting period. Please limit your comments to a maximum of 4 to 6 sentences. During this reporting period, MCSP Zambia: Supported MOH to conduct a data quality assessment to identify and address data quality gaps that some districts have been recording due to inability to correctly interpret data elements in HMIS tools. Some districts lacked the revised registers as well. Collected data on Phase 2 of the TA study looking at the acceptability, level of influence, and results of MCSP’s TA model that supports the G2G granting mechanism. Data collection included interviews with 53 MOH staff from 4 provinces, 20 districts and 20 health facilities. Supported 16 districts in mentorship and service quality assessment (SQA) to support planning and decision-making. In the period under review, MCSP established that multidisciplinary mentorship teams in 10 districts in Luapula Province were functional. Continued with the eIMCI/EPI course orientation in all Provinces. By the end of the quarter under review, in Muchinga 26 HCWs had completed the course, increasing the number of HCWs who improved EPI knowledge and can manage children using IMNCI Guidelines. In Southern Province, 19 mentors from 4 districts were oriented through the electronic EPI/IMNCI interactive learning and had the software installed on their computers.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Progress Report (January – March, 2017)
    Quarterly Progress Report (January – March, 2017) Approval Date: September 30, 2015 QPR Number: [002] Contract/Agreement Number: [AID-611-C-15-00002] Activity Start Date and End Date: [October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2020] Total Award Amount: [$24,389,716.00] Submitted by: [PATH Zambia Office, Stand 11059, Brentwood Lane, Lusaka] [Tel: +260211378950] DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), United States President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI) or the United States Government List of Abbreviations ANC Antenatal care BRITE Broad Reach Institute for Training & Education CBO Community-based organizations CD Continuous distribution CHA Community Health Assistant CHAZ Churches Health Association of Zambia CHW Community Health Worker COP Chief of Party CSO Civil Society Organization DHD District Health Director DHO District Health Office DHIS2 District Health Information System 2 DHS Demographic Health Survey DIM District Integrated Meeting EPI Expanded Program on Immunization GRZ Government of the Republic of Zambia GUC Grants under contract HMIS Health Management Information System iCCM Integrated community case management IEC Information, education, and communication IPTp Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy IRS Indoor residual spraying ITN Insecticide-treated net JHUCCP Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs LLIN Long Lasting Insecticide Treated Net MACEPA Malaria Control and Elimination Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Census of Population and Housing
    2000 Census of Population and Housing Published by Central Statistical Office, P. O. Box 31908, Lusaka, Luapula. Tel: 260-01-251377/253468 Fax: 260-01-253468 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.zamstats.gov.zm September, 2004 COPYRIGHT RESERVED Extracts may be published if Sources are duly acknowledged. Table of Content and Executive Summary i Table of Content and Executive Summary ii Preface The 2000 Census of Population and Housing was undertaken from 16th October to 15th November, 2000. This was the fourth census since Independence in 1964. The other three were carried out in 1969, 1980 and 1990. The 2000 Census operations were undertaken with the use of Grade 11 pupils as enumerators, Primary School Teachers as supervisors, Professionals from within Central Statistical Office and other government departments being as Trainers and Management Staff. Professionals and Technical Staff of the Central Statistical Office were assigned more technical and professional tasks. This report presents detailed analysis of issues on evaluation of coverage and content errors; population, size, growth and composition; ethnicity and languages; economic and education characteristics; fertility; mortality and disability. The success of the Census accrues to the dedicated support and involvement of a large number of institutions and individuals. My sincere thanks go to Co-operating partners namely the British Government, the Japanese Government, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the Norwegian Government, the Dutch Government, the Finnish Government, the Danish Government, the German Government, University of Michigan, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and the Canadian Government for providing financial, material and technical assistance which enabled the Central Statistical Office carry out the Census.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Awareness Among Key Actors of Selected Zambian Schools of Nchelenge District in Luapula Province
    ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS AMONG KEY ACTORS OF SELECTED ZAMBIAN SCHOOLS OF NCHELENGE DISTRICT IN LUAPULA PROVINCE. By Makoba Charles A dissertation submitted to the University of Zambia in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Education in Environmental Education. The University of Zambia Lusaka 2014 i DECLARATION I, CHARLES MAKOBA, declare that the dissertation hereby submitted is my own work and it has not previously been submitted for any Degree, Diploma or other qualification at the University of Zambia or any other University. Signed: ………………………………………… Date:…………………………………………… ii APPROVAL This dissertation by Charles Makoba is approved as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the Master of Education (Environmental Education) degree of the University of Zambia. Signed……………………………………….. Date………………………………….. Signed……………………………………….. Date…………………………………... Signed……………………………………….. Date…………………………………… iii COPYRIGHT No part of this dissertation may be reproduced, restored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission. iv ABSTRACT There are several environmental conditions that have become areas of major concern at global, regional and national levels both in urban and rural areas. These conditions are as a result of environmental degradation such as deforestation, indiscriminate waste disposal, poor health and sanitation, water pollution and land degradation to mention but a few. Environmental mismanagement affects both human beings and other living organisms in different ways, such as outbreaks of diseases like cholera which is very common in Nchelenge district especially Kashikishi settlement and islands where it has become an annual event. Such diseases could be due to unfriendly environmental practices by the local people, who may probably, have very limited knowledge on how to utilize the environment in a more sustainable manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care and Treatment (ZPCT) Partnership Cooperative Agreement No
    Zambia HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care and Treatment (ZPCT) Partnership Cooperative Agreement No. 690-A-00-04-00319-00 Quarterly Report for January 1– March 31, 2007 Submitted by Family Health International (FHI) April 30, 2007 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Zambia HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care and Treatment (ZPCT) Partnership works with the Ministry of Health (MOH), the Provincial Health Offices (PHOs), and District Health Management Teams (DHMTs) to strengthen and expand HIV/AIDS related services in five provinces: Central, Copperbelt, Luapula, Northern and North Western. The Partnership supports the Government of the Republic of Zambia (GRZ) goals of reducing prevalence rates and providing antiretroviral therapy (ART) by implementing technical, program and management strategies to initiate, improve and scale-up prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), counseling and testing (CT) and clinical care services for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA), including ART. ZPCT is currently supporting implementation of HIV/AIDS services in 87 health facilities in 25 districts in the five target provinces. Services were initiated and/or strengthened in 43 facilities in nine districts in April 2005, and subsequently expanded to an additional 39 facilities in October 2005. Since then, ZPCT has expanded support to HIV/AIDS services in five new health facilities, including ART, during the current workplan period. During this quarter, ZPCT provided support to 87 facilities in 25 districts. Technical assistance, staff training and other preparatory activities have continued to strengthen services in the five new health facilities. Key activities and achievements for this reporting period include: CT services are ongoing in 86 health facilities. 23,658 individuals received CT services in ZPCT-supported facilities this quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT for LOCAL GOVERNANCE.Pdf
    REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNANCE, HOUSING AND CHIEFS’ AFFAIRS FOR THE FIFTH SESSION OF THE NINTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY APPOINTED ON 19TH JANUARY 2006 PRINTED BY THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF ZAMBIA i REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNANCE, HOUSING AND CHIEFS’ AFFAIRS FOR THE FIFTH SESSION OF THE NINTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY APPOINTED ON 19TH JANUARY 2006 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEMS PAGE 1. Membership 1 2. Functions 1 3. Meetings 1 PART I 4. CONSIDERATION OF THE 2006 REPORT OF THE HON MINISTER OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSING ON AUDITED ACCOUNTS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT i) Chibombo District Council 1 ii) Luangwa District Council 2 iii) Chililabombwe Municipal Council 3 iv) Livingstone City Council 4 v) Mungwi District Council 6 vi) Solwezi Municipal Council 7 vii) Chienge District Council 8 viii) Kaoma District Council 9 ix) Mkushi District Council 9 5 SUBMISSION BY THE PERMANENT SECRETARY (BEA), MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND NATIONAL PLANNING ON FISCAL DECENTRALISATION 10 6. SUBMISSION BY THE PERMANENT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSING ON GENERAL ISSUES 12 PART II 7. ACTION-TAKEN REPORT ON THE COMMITTEE’S REPORT FOR 2005 i) Mpika District Council 14 ii) Chipata Municipal Council 14 iii) Katete District Council 15 iv) Sesheke District Council 15 v) Petauke District Council 16 vi) Kabwe Municipal Council 16 vii) Monze District Council 16 viii) Nyimba District Council 17 ix) Mambwe District Council 17 x) Chama District Council 18 xi) Inspection Audit Report for 1st January to 31st August 2004 18 xii) Siavonga District Council 18 iii xiii) Mazabuka Municipal Council 19 xiv) Kabompo District Council 19 xv) Decentralisation Policy 19 xvi) Policy issues affecting operations of Local Authorities 21 xvii) Minister’s Report on Audited Accounts for 2005 22 PART III 8.
    [Show full text]