Download Our Apps Today (Or Simply Surf to Mackinac.Org on Your Mobile Device)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SENATE DIRECTORY Name SENATE OFFICE Locationscommittee Assignments Party Affiliation (C) - Chair, (VC) - Vice Chair House State Capitol Building Connie B
SENATE DIRECTORY Name SENATE OFFICE LOCATIONSCommittee Assignments Party Affiliation (C) - Chair, (VC) - Vice Chair House State Capitol Building Connie B. Binsfeld Building Boji Tower District HomeP.O. Address Box 30036 Lansing Office201 Townsend Street (MVC) -124 Minority West ViceAllegan Chair Street and Senate Leadership Position andLansing, Telephone MI 48909-7536 and Telephone Lansing, MI 48933 (M) - MemberLansing, MI 48933 Service Name Committee Assignments Party Affiliation (C) - Chair, (VC) - Vice Chair House District Home Address Lansing Office (MVC) - Minority Vice Chair and Senate Leadership Position and Telephone and Telephone (M) - Member Service Senator Jim Ananich 932 Maxine Street Capitol Bldg. Agriculture (MVC) House: Democrat Flint, MI 48503 P.O. Box 30036 Government Operations (MVC) 1/1/11 - 5/12/13 27th District Lansing, MI 48909-7536 Legislative Council (M) Senate: Minority Leader Room S-105 5/13/13 - Present 5 (517) 373-0142 Fax: (517) 373-3938 E-mail: [email protected] Website: senatedems.com/ananich Senator Steven M. Bieda 32721 Valley Drive Connie B. Binsfeld Bldg. Economic Development & International House: Democrat Warren, MI 48093 P.O. Box 30036 Investment (M) 1/1/03 - 12/31/08 9th District (586) 979-5387 Lansing, MI 48909-7536 Finance (MVC) Senate: Assistant Minority Room 6300 Insurance (MVC) 1/1/11 - Present Leader (517) 373-8360 Judiciary (MVC) Fax: (517) 373-9230 Legislative Council (Alt. M) Toll-free: (866) 262-7309 Michigan Capitol Committee (M) E-mail: [email protected] Michigan Commission on Uniform State Laws (M) Website: senate.michigan.gov/bieda SENATE DIRECTORY Name Committee Assignments Party Affiliation (C) - Chair, (VC) - Vice Chair House District Home Address Lansing Office (MVC) - Minority Vice Chair and Senate Leadership Position and Telephone and Telephone (M) - Member Service Senator Darwin L. -
2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support
16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support 1 16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support Lilly employees are dedicated to innovation and the discovery of medicines to help people live longer, healthier and more active lives, and more importantly, doing their work with integrity. LillyPAC was established to work to ensure that this vision is also shared by lawmakers, who make policy decisions that impact our company and the patients we serve. In a new political environment where policies can change with a “tweet,” we must be even more vigilant about supporting those who believe in our story, and our PAC is an effective way to support those who share our views. We also want to ensure that you know the story of LillyPAC. Transparency is an important element of our integrity promise, and so we are pleased to share this 2016 LillyPAC annual report with you. LillyPAC raised $949,267 through the generous, voluntary contributions of 3,682 Lilly employees in 2016. Those contributions allowed LillyPAC to invest in 187 federal candidates and more than 500 state candidates who understand the importance of what we do. You will find a full financial accounting in the following pages, as well as complete lists of candidates and political committees that received LillyPAC support and the permissible corporate contributions made by the company. In addition, this report is a helpful guide to understanding how our PAC operates and makes its contribution decisions. On behalf of the LillyPAC Governing Board, I want to thank everyone who has made the decision to support this vital program. -
Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws. -
United for Health PAC 2015 U.S. Political Contributions & Related
2015 US Political Contributions & Related Activity Report LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN Our workforce of more than 225,000 people is dedicated to helping people live healthier lives and helping to make the health system work better for everyone. Technological change, new collaborations, market dynamics and a shift toward building a more modern infrastructure for health care are driving rapid evolution of the health care market. Federal and state policy-makers, on behalf of their constituents and communities, continue to be deeply involved in this changing marketplace. UnitedHealth Group remains an active participant in the political process to provide proven solutions that enhance the health system. The United for Health PAC is an important component of our overall strategy to engage with elected officials and policy-makers, to communicate our perspectives on priority issues, and to share with them our capabilities and innovations. The United for Health PAC is a nonpartisan political action committee supported by voluntary contributions from eligible employees. The PAC supports federal and state candidates who align with our business objectives to increase quality, access, and affordability in health care, in accordance with applicable election laws and as overseen by the UnitedHealth Group Board of Directors’ Public Policy Strategies and Responsibility Committee. UnitedHealth Group remains committed to sharing with federal and state governments the advances and expertise we have developed to improve the nation’s overall health and well-being. -
2019-2020 Legislative Scorecard Summary
2019-2020 LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD SUMMARY WHAT MADE THIS POSSIBLE? YOU! TOWARD A CONSERVATION MAJORITY In 2019 and 2020, you used your voice to tell your Because Michigan LCV is both political and non- legislators to move forward with clean energy, partisan, our goal is to build a pro-conservation demand clean drinking water in our communities majority of state lawmakers from both parties who and conserve our state’s incredible natural support protecting the health of our communities resources. by tackling the big issues facing Michigan’s land, air, and water. Together, we are making a difference. An important part of our work is holding our elected officials accountable. This scorecard tells HOUSE you whether your representatives in Lansing Conservation Majority Breakdown listened to you and your neighbors, or if they listened to special interests. YES = 50 TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS MAYBE = 31 YOU KNOW THE SCORE NO = 31 1 It only takes a minute to say thanks-- or to TOTAL = 112 say no thanks-- to your legislators. DONATE Because we could not accomplish our 2 mission without the generous support of SENATE our members, please make a donation so Conservation Majority Breakdown we can continue fighting for clean air and clean water in your community and continue YES = 16 our stewardship of Michigan’s unparalleled natural resources. MAYBE = 3 NO = 19 SPREAD THE WORD Finally, share this scorecard with your TOTAL = 38 3 friends and family so they know the score of their elected officials, too. Total number of legislators in the Michigan House exceeds number YOU CAN DO ALL OF THIS AT of House districts due to an early resignation and the passing of one MICHIGANLCV.ORG/SCORECARD Representative during the term. -
2014 Report of Political Financial Support
2014 2014 Lilly Political Contributions As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2014 Corporate Responsibility Update. Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these issues. Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehen- sive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state, and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. debate over health care and pharmaceutical innovation. -
Michigan Senate Leader's Plan to Overhaul Mental Health System Worries Advocates Craig Mauger the Detroit News Published 11:33 P.M
Plan to overhaul Michigan's mental health system worries advocates https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/05/09/plan-overha... POLITICS Michigan Senate leader's plan to overhaul mental health system worries advocates Craig Mauger The Detroit News Published 11:33 p.m. ET May 9, 2021 Lansing — Michigan Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey has been crafting a proposal to reshape the state's $3 billion mental health system, shifting the management of care for hundreds of thousands of residents from a publicly run program to private insurance plans. The legislation, which is yet to be formally introduced, would affect individuals on Medicaid with severe mental illness, substance use disorders and developmental disabilities. The Clarklake Republican was initially hoping for quick movement on the legislation, according to an internal document about the proposal that's labeled "confidential" and has been shared with stakeholders. The stakes are high with an overhaul changing the system that provides mental health care to more than 300,000 residents. The fight over the change is expected to be fierce. Advocates who work on behalf of those with mental illness, like Kevin Fischer, said they're concerned the overhaul would put profits ahead of what's in the best interest of a vulnerable population. Fischer's son, Dominique, was diagnosed with a serious mental illness at age 20. Three years later, Dominique committed suicide. "This quite frankly is a money grab. It’s a money grab by the health plans," said Fischer, executive director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness's Michigan organization. -
Pfizer Inc. Regarding Congruency of Political Contributions on Behalf of Tara Health Foundation
SANFORD J. LEWIS, ATTORNEY January 28, 2021 Via electronic mail Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Shareholder Proposal to Pfizer Inc. Regarding congruency of political contributions on Behalf of Tara Health Foundation Ladies and Gentlemen: Tara Health Foundation (the “Proponent”) is beneficial owner of common stock of Pfizer Inc. (the “Company”) and has submitted a shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) to the Company. I have been asked by the Proponent to respond to the supplemental letter dated January 25, 2021 ("Supplemental Letter") sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Margaret M. Madden. A copy of this response letter is being emailed concurrently to Margaret M. Madden. The Company continues to assert that the proposal is substantially implemented. In essence, the Company’s original and supplemental letters imply that under the substantial implementation doctrine as the company understands it, shareholders are not entitled to make the request of this proposal for an annual examination of congruency, but that a simple written acknowledgment that Pfizer contributions will sometimes conflict with company values is all on this topic that investors are entitled to request through a shareholder proposal. The Supplemental letter makes much of the claim that the proposal does not seek reporting on “instances of incongruency” but rather on how Pfizer’s political and electioneering expenditures aligned during the preceding year against publicly stated company values and policies.” While the company has provided a blanket disclaimer of why its contributions may sometimes be incongruent, the proposal calls for an annual assessment of congruency. -
For the 101St Michigan Legislature
FOR THE 101ST MICHIGAN LEGISLATURE DECEMBER 2020 About MSU’s Legislative Leadership Program MSU’s Legislative Leadership Program invites new members of Michigan’s House of Representatives and Michigan Senate to engage in interactive sessions with content experts, including university faculty and practitioners, in the brief time between election and their first legislative sessions. At its 1994 inception, LLP was designed to create a forum and the resources to help newly elected legislators meet the challenges of serving in a state with term limits. The program was meant to help legislators forge links to university policy resources. Since that time, LLP has evolved into a broadened opportunity to gain insights into concepts that affect statewide constituencies, into evidence-based information on emerging issues and into the art and science of governing in divided times, such as under state House co-speakerships. At the same time, IPPSR has evolved as a hub for policy expertise, information and outreach, a center for survey research training and excellence, and an opportunity for training for those who seek leadership through elected office or public service. The program is built upon a series of specially designed events, including presenters, researchers and facilitated discussions. Sessions are focused on topics of compelling interest, from the state’s revenue stream, to its expenditures, K-12 education, demographics and innovations. IPPSR is proud that LLP has hosted a majority of newly elected legislators from each party and draws support from the Legislature’s highest officers. The program continues to build on MSU's long-standing tradition of providing leadership training to state and county officials, community leaders, and aspiring public officials. -
Legislative Leadership Program
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Legislative Leadership Program MONDAY DECEMBER 7, 2020 ONLINE VIA ZOOM 00 9 OPENING REMARKS MATT GROSSMANN Director, Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, College of Social Science, Michigan State University SAMUEL L. STANLEY JR., M.D. President, Michigan State University 930 ISSUE BREAKOUTS 1030 BREAK 1045 LEGISLATIVE LEADERS ROUNDTABLE REP. JASON WENTWORTH Speaker-Elect, Michigan House of Representatives REP. DONNA LASINSKI House Democratic Leader Elect, Michigan House of Representatives SEN. MIKE SHIRKEY Senate Majority Leader, Michigan Senate SEN. JIM ANANICH Senate Democratic Leader, Michigan Senate 1145 GEORGE COOK Legislative Liaison, Office of Governor Whitmer 1200 BREAK 100 MICHIGAN’S BUDGET -- REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES MARY ANN CLEARY, Director, House Fiscal Agency CHRIS HARKINS, Director, Senate Fiscal Agency MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Legislative Leadership Program MONDAY DECEMBER 7, 2020 ONLINE VIA ZOOM PAGE 2 215 STATE AGENCY MEETUP 255 BREAK 305 ACROSS THE PARTISAN DIVIDE BRENT HILL Director, Next Generation Program, National Institute for Civil Discourse 400 QUESTIONS/CONCLUSION MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Legislative Leadership Program TUESDAY DECEMBER 8, 2020 ONLINE VIA ZOOM PAGE 3 00 9 OPENING REMARKS/Q&A TERESA K. WOODRUFF Provost, Michigan State University 20 9 ECONOMIC OUTLOOK & BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CHARLES BALLARD Economics Professor, Michigan State University GABE EHRLICH Director, Research Seminar in Quantitative Economics, University of Michigan 1020 BREAK 1030 COVID-19 AND LONG-TERM STRATEGIES FOR MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH Covid-19 Testing, Contact Tracing, Innovations LEO KEMPLE Dean, College of Engineering, Michigan State University JACK LIPTON, Ph.D. Chair and Professor of Translational Neuroscience, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University JOAN ROSE, Ph.D. -
HP Corporate Political Contributions Document Reflects HP Corporate Political Contributions from Inception of Program in 2017 Through 2020
HP Corporate Political Contributions Document reflects HP corporate political contributions from inception of program in 2017 through 2020. HP generally does not contribute to 527 organizations except as disclosed below. No ballot initiatives have been supported since inception; HP will disclose if funds are contributed for ballot initiatives. 2020 Corporate Contributions Total $ 138,900 2H 2020 Corporate Contributions (Jul -Dec) $ 33,000 Candidate/Committee Party State Office District Amount California Gavin Newsom DEM CA Governor $21,000 Subtotal $21,000 Idaho Idaho Prosperity Fund ID $5,000 Subtotal $5,000 Michigan Rep. Christine Greig (Falcon Community Fdn.) DEM MI 501 (C) (4) $1,000 Sen. Mike Shirkey (Michigan My Michigan) REP MI 501 (C) (4) $2,000 Rep. Lee Chatfield (Peninsula Fund) REP MI 501 (C) (4) $2,000 Sen. Jim Ananich (Reinvent Michigan Fund) DEM MI 501 (C) (4) $2,000 Subtotal $7,000 1H 2020 Corporate Contributions (Jan -Jun) $ 105,900 National Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee DEM Party Committee (527) $ 15,000 Republican Legislative Campaign Committee REP Party Committee (527) $ 15,000 Democratic Governors Association DEM Party Committee (527) $ 25,000 Republican Governors Association REP Party Committee (527) $ 25,000 Subtotal $ 80,000 Page 1 HP Inc. Corporate Political Contributions Candidate/Committee Party State Office District Amount California Berman, Marc DEM CA Assembly 24 $ 3,000 Burke, Autumn DEM CA Assembly 26 $ 1,500 Cooper, Jim DEM CA Assembly 9 $ 1,250 Irwin, Jacqui DEM CA Assembly 44 $ 1,500 Low, -
VIIB RR1 ATT1E Public Official Outreach 01 29 16
ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT Comments on the DEIS Resource Report – Project Description VOLUME IIB Attachment 1E Public Official Outreach April 2016 NEEDS REMOVED FROM NEEDS REMOVED FROM DATABASE - NEEDS ADDED TO THE DATABASE - JUSTIFICATION JUSTIFICATION MARKED DATABASE MARKED IN COLUMN I IN COLUMN "K" Other Persons Contacted Regarding the Rover Pipeline Project Contact Name Title District/Parish/County Street Address City State Zip Phone No. Federal Legislators 393 Russell Senate Ofc. Bob Casey US Senator PA Washington DC 20510 202-224-6324 Bldg. 248 Russell Senate Ofc. Pat Toomey US Senator PA Washington DC 20510 202-224-5941 Bldg. NOT RELEVANT-NOT ON Mike Kelly US Rep PA-3 1519 Longworth HOB Washington DC 20515 202-225-5406 PROJECT ROUTE NOT RELEVANT-NOT ON Bill Shuster US Rep PA-9 2209 Rayburn HOB Washington DC 20515 202-225-2431 PROJECT ROUTE NOT RELEVANT-NOT ON Keith Rothfus US Rep PA-12 503 Cannon HOH Washington DC 20515 202-225-2065 PROJECT ROUTE NOT RELEVANT-NOT ON Mike Doyle US Rep PA-14 239 Cannon HOB Washington DC 20515 202-225-3135 PROJECT ROUTE Tim Murphy US Rep PA-18 2332 Rayburn HOB Washington DC 20515 202-225-2301 NOT RELEVANT-NOT ON Lou Barletta US Rep PA-11 115 Cannon HOB Washington DC 20515 202-225-6511 PROJECT ROUTE NOT RELEVANT-NOT ON Pat Meehan US Rep PA-7 204 Cannon HOB Washington DC 20515 202-225-2011 PROJECT ROUTE NOT RELEVANT-NOT ON Scott Perry US Rep PA-4 126 Cannon HOB Washington DC 20515 202-225-5836 PROJECT ROUTE Page 1 of 140 Other Persons Contacted Regarding the Rover Pipeline Project Contact Name Title District/Parish/County Street Address City State Zip Phone No.