Arxiv:0803.0883V3 [Hep-Ph] 2 Dec 2008 Herwig++ Physics and Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arxiv:0803.0883V3 [Hep-Ph] 2 Dec 2008 Herwig++ Physics and Manual CERN-PH-TH/2008-038 Cavendish-HEP-08/03 KA-TP-05-2008 DCPT/08/22 IPPP/08/11 CP3-08-05 Herwig++ Physics and Manual M. B¨ahr1, S. Gieseke1, M.A. Gigg2, D. Grellscheid2, K. Hamilton3, O. Latunde- Dada4, S. Pl¨atzer1, P. Richardson2, M.H. Seymour5,6, A. Sherstnev4, J. Tully2, B.R. Webber4 1 Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, Universit¨at Karlsruhe. 2 Department of Physics, Durham University. 3Centre for Particle Physics and Phenomenology, Universit´e Catholique de Louvain. 4 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge. 5 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester. 6 Physics Department, CERN. Authors’ E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this paper we describe Herwig++ version 2.3, a general-purpose Monte Carlo event generator for the simulation of hard lepton-lepton, lepton-hadron and hadron-hadron col- lisions. A number of important hard scattering processes are available, together with an interface via the Les Houches Accord to specialized matrix element generators for addi- tional processes. The simulation of Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) physics includes a range of models and allows new models to be added by encoding the Feynman rules of the model. The parton-shower approach is used to simulate initial- and final-state QCD radia- tion, including colour coherence effects, with special emphasis on the correct description of arXiv:0803.0883v3 [hep-ph] 2 Dec 2008 radiation from heavy particles. The underlying event is simulated using an eikonal multiple parton-parton scattering model. The formation of hadrons from the quarks and gluons produced in the parton shower is described using the cluster hadronization model. Hadron decays are simulated using matrix elements, where possible including spin correlations and off-shell effects. Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Technical Details 7 3 Matrix Elements 10 3.1 Leadingordermatrixelements. ....... 10 3.2 Next-to-leading-order matrix elements . ........... 12 3.3 LesHouchesinterface. .. .. .. ..... 13 3.4 Processes with incoming photons . ....... 13 3.5 Codestructure ................................... 14 3.5.1 StandardEventHandler . 14 3.5.2 LesHouchesEventHandler . .... 15 3.5.3 Kinematiccuts ................................. 15 4 Perturbative Decays and Spin Correlations 17 4.1 Spincorrelations ................................ .... 17 4.2 StandardModeldecays. .. .. .. .... 20 4.3 QEDradiation .................................... 21 4.4 Codestructure ................................... 21 5 Physics Beyond The Standard Model 22 5.1 Hardprocess ..................................... 22 5.2 Decays.......................................... 23 5.3 Off-ShellEffects.................................. 24 5.4 Modeldescriptions ............................... .... 25 5.4.1 StandardModel................................. 25 5.4.2 Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model . ...... 26 5.4.3 Randall-SundrumModel . 26 5.4.4 Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions Model . ....... 27 5.5 Codestructure ................................... 27 6 Parton Showers 33 6.1 Showerkinematics ................................ 33 6.2 Showerdynamics .................................. 37 6.3 Initialconditions ............................... ..... 40 6.3.1 Final-finalcolourconnection . ...... 41 6.3.2 Initial-initial colour connection . ......... 42 6.3.3 Initial-final colour connection in the hard process . ............ 42 6.3.4 Initial-final colour connection in decays . .......... 43 6.4 Final-stateradiation . ...... 44 6.4.1 Evolution .................................... 44 6.4.2 Kinematicreconstruction. ..... 46 6.5 Initial-stateradiation . ....... 47 6.5.1 Evolution .................................... 47 1 6.5.2 Kinematicreconstruction. ..... 50 6.5.3 Forcedsplitting ............................... 53 6.6 Radiationinparticledecays . ....... 54 6.6.1 Evolution .................................... 55 6.6.2 Kinematicreconstruction. ..... 56 6.7 The running coupling constant αS ........................... 57 6.7.1 The argument of αS .............................. 57 6.7.2 The Monte Carlo scheme for αS ........................ 59 6.7.3 Options for the treatment of αS inpartonshowers . 59 6.8 Matrixelementcorrections . ....... 61 6.8.1 Softmatrixelementcorrections . ...... 61 6.8.2 Hardmatrixelementcorrections. ...... 62 6.8.3 Using Herwig++ matrix element corrections . ........ 63 6.9 Showering in the POWHEG scheme . .... 63 6.10Codestructure .................................. 65 7 Hadronization 68 7.1 Gluon splitting and cluster formation . .......... 68 7.2 Clusterfission................................... 68 7.3 Clusterdecays................................... 70 7.3.1 Mixingweights ................................. 72 7.4 HadronizationinBSMmodels . ..... 73 7.4.1 Stable strongly interacting particles . .......... 74 7.4.2 Baryonnumberviolation. 74 7.5 Codestructure ................................... 74 8 Underlying Event and Beam Remnants 77 8.1 Semi-hardpartonicscatters . ....... 77 8.2 Softpartonicscatters. ...... 79 8.2.1 MonteCarloimplementation. .... 81 8.3 Connection to different simulation phases . ........... 84 8.3.1 Parton showers and hard matrix elements . ...... 84 8.3.2 Minimumbiasprocess .. .. .. 84 8.3.3 Hadronization................................. 84 8.4 UA5parametrization .............................. .... 85 8.5 Codestructure ................................... 86 9 Hadron Decays 89 9.1 Particleproperties .............................. ..... 89 9.2 Lineshapes ...................................... 93 9.3 Taudecays....................................... 94 9.3.1 Hadroniccurrents.............................. 94 9.4 Strong and electromagnetic hadron decays . .......... 97 9.4.1 Scalarmesons.................................. 97 9.4.2 Vectormesons.................................. 99 9.4.3 Tensormesons.................................. 101 2 9.4.4 BaryonDecays ................................. 102 9.4.5 Inclusive strong and electromagnetic decays . .......... 104 9.5 Weakhadronicdecays .............................. 104 9.5.1 Exclusive semi-leptonic decays . ....... 104 9.5.2 Exclusive hadronic decays . .... 108 9.5.3 Weak inclusive decays . 109 9.5.4 Leptonicdecays................................ 109 9.5.5 b sγ ...................................... 110 → 9.6 Codestructure ................................... 110 10 Summary 113 A Repository Commands 115 A.1 Example......................................... 117 B Examples 119 B.1 Switching parts of the simulation off . ........ 119 B.2 Setupforminimumbiasruns . .... 120 B.3 Simulation of several hard processes in one event . ............. 121 B.4 Changingparticleproperties . ........ 122 B.5 Changingsomesimplecuts. ..... 123 B.6 Setting up an AnalysisHandler . ....... 123 B.7 UsageofROOT..................................... 125 B.7.1 Roothistograms ................................ 126 B.7.2 rtuplewithTTree............................... 127 B.8 UsingBSMmodels .................................. 129 B.8.1 MSSM...................................... 129 B.8.2 MUED...................................... 131 B.8.3 RSModel .................................... 131 B.8.4 Disabling Selected Decay Modes . ..... 132 B.9 Intrinsic pT ....................................... 132 B.10 LesHouchesEventHandler . ....... 133 B.11UseofLHAPDF .................................... 134 B.12UseofasimplesaturationmodelforPDFs . ......... 135 C Contrib 136 D Tuning 137 3 1 Introduction Herwig++ is a general-purpose event generator for the simulation of high-energy lepton-lepton, lepton-hadron and hadron-hadron collisions with special emphasis on the accurate simulation of QCD radiation. It builds upon the heritage of the HERWIG program [1–6], while providing a much more flexible structure for further development. It already includes several features more advanced than the last FORTRAN version. Herwig++ provides a full simulation of high energy collisions with the following special features: Initial- and final-state QCD jet evolution taking account of soft gluon interference via • angular ordering; A detailed treatment of the suppression of QCD radiation from massive particles, the dead- • cone effect [7]; The simulation of BSM physics including correlations between the production and decay • of the BSM particles together with the ability to add new models by simply encoding the Feynman rules; An eikonal model for multiple partonic scatterings to describe the underlying event [8]; • A cluster model of the hadronization of jets based on non-perturbative gluon splitting; • A sophisticated model of hadron and tau decays using matrix elements to give the momenta • of the decay products for many modes and including a detailed treatment of off-shell effects and spin correlations. Some of these features were already present in the first version of Herwig++ [9]. However, there have been many improvements to both the physics and structure of the simulation following this first release, most notably the extension to hadron-hadron collisions. Given the significant differences between the current version of the program, 2.3, and that described in [9] we will describe all of the features of the program in this paper. A number of other generators are also being (re-)written for the LHC era. The PYTHIA event generator is currently being rewritten as PYTHIA8 [10]. The rewrite of ARIADNE [11] is in progress as well. Like Herwig++, this is built on the platform of ThePEG [12], which we describe below. SHERPA [13] is a completely new event generator project. It is useful to start by recalling
Recommended publications
  • Hadronic Light-By-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment
    UG-FT/242-08 CAFPE/112-08 CPT-P092-2008 FTPI-MINN-08/41 UMN-TH-2723/08 Hadronic Light–by–Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment Joaquim Prades a, Eduardo de Rafael b and Arkady Vainshtein c aCAPFE and Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Fuente Nueva, E-18002 Granada, Spain bCentre de Physique Th´eorique, CNRS-Luminy Case 907, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France cWilliam I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Abstract We review the current status of theoretical calculations of the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment. Different approaches and related issues such as OPE constraints and large breaking of chiral symmetry are discussed. Combining results of different models with educated guesses on the errors we come to the estimate − aHLbL = (10.5 ± 2.6) × 10 10 . The text is prepared as a contribution to the Glasgow White Paper on the present status of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment. arXiv:0901.0306v1 [hep-ph] 3 Jan 2009 1. Introduction. From a theoretical point of view the hadronic light–by–light scattering (HLbL) contribution to the muon magnetic moment is described by the vertex function (see Fig. 1 below): 4 4 (H) (H) 6 d k1 d k2 Πµνρσ (q, k1, k3, k2) ν −1 ρ −1 σ Γ (p ,p )= ie γ (p + k mµ) γ (p k mµ) γ , (1) µ 2 1 (2π)4 (2π)4 k2k2k2 6 2 6 2 − 6 1− 6 1 − Z Z 1 2 3 (H) where mµ is the muon mass and Πµνρσ (q, k1, k3, k2), with q = p2 p1 = k1 k2 k3, denotes the off–shell photon–photon scattering amplitude induced by hadrons,− − − − Π(H) (q, k , k , k ) = d4x d4x d4x exp[ i(k x +k x +k x )] µνρσ 1 3 2 1 2 3 − 1 · 1 2 · 2 3 · 3 Z Z Z 0 T jµ(0) jν (x ) jρ(x ) jσ(x ) 0 .
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Chiral Perturbation Theory in Its Manifestly Covariant Forms and the Study of the Πn Dynamics & on the Y (2175) Resonance
    Baryon Chiral Perturbation Theory in its manifestly covariant forms and the study of the πN dynamics & On the Y (2175) resonance Jose Manuel Alarc´on Soriano Departamento de F´ısica Universidad de Murcia Tesis Doctoral Director: Prof. Jos´eAntonio Oller Berber . Dedicado a todos aquellos que siempre confiaron en m´ı. Contents 1 Introduction 9 2 Chiral Perturbation Theory 21 2.1 PropertiesofnonlinearLagrangians . 23 2.2 Standard form of nonlinear realizations . 24 2.3 Classification of all nonlinear realizations . 28 2.4 Relations between linear and nonlinear transformations . 31 2.5 Covariant derivatives and invariant Lagrangians . 36 2.6 Application to the chiral group . 38 2.7 GaugeFields ........................... 41 2.8 ThePowerCounting ....................... 43 2.9 ConstructionofEffectiveLagrangians . 44 3 πN Scattering 49 3.1 PartialWaveAnalyses . .. .. 50 3.2 ChiralPerturbationTheory . 53 3.2.1 Miscellaneous . 55 3.2.2 ChiralLagrangians . 59 3.2.3 The Power Counting in Covariant Baryon Chiral Per- turbationTheory . .. .. 64 3.3 Isospinbreakingcorrections . 66 3.4 Unitarization Techniques . 68 4 Infrared Regularization 71 4.1 Recovering the Power Counting . 71 4.2 Calculation of the Chiral Amplitude . 74 4.3 Fits................................. 75 4.3.1 Strategy-1......................... 75 5 4.3.2 Strategy-2......................... 81 4.4 ConvergenceoftheChiralSeries. 86 4.5 The Goldberger-Treiman Relation . 88 4.6 Unitarized amplitudes and higher energies . 90 4.7 SummaryandConclusions . 94 5 Extended-On-Mass-Shell 97 5.1 The Extended-On-Mass-Shell renormalization . 97 5.1.1 Chiral corrections to the nucleon mass . 99 5.1.2 The Axial Coupling of the Nucleon . 101 5.1.3 The ScalarFormFactoroftheNucleon .
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Theory of Heavy Mesons and Baryons*
    UCSD/PTH 94-24 An Introduction To The Theory Of Heavy Mesons And Baryons* Benjam´ın Grinstein† Department Of Physics University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0319, USA Introductory lectures on heavy quarks and heavy quark effective field theory. Appli- cations to inclusive semileptonic decays and to interactions with light mesons are covered in detail. 11/94 *Lectures given at TASI, June 1994 † [email protected] Contents 1.Introduction .............................. 2 1.1.TheNovemberRevolution . 3 1.2. The b-quark ............................. 6 2.Preliminaries .............................. 9 2.1.ConventionsandNotation . 9 2.2.EffectiveLagrangians . .10 2.3.FormulatingEffectiveLagrangians . 10 2.4.ComputingEffectiveLagrangians . 11 3.HeavyQuarkEffectiveFieldTheory . 13 3.1.IntuitiveIntroduction . .13 3.2. The Effective Lagrangian and its Feynman Rules . .15 3.3.Symmetries . .17 3.4.Spectrum ..............................19 3.5. CovariantRepresentationofStates . 22 3.6.MesonDecayConstants . .23 3.7.Semileptonicdecays . .25 3.8.BeyondTreeLevel . .28 3.9.ExternalCurrents . .32 3.10. Form factors in order αs .......................37 4. 1/MQ .................................38 4.1.TheCorrectingLagrangian . .38 4.2. TheCorrectedCurrents . .41 4.3. Corrections of order mc/mb ......................42 4.4. Corrections of order Λ¯/mc and Λ¯/mb. .................43 5. Inclusive Semileptonic B-MesonDecays. .46 5.1.Kinematics. .46 5.2. The Analytic Structure of The Hadronic Green Function . ........47 5.3.AnHQETbasedOPE . .51 6.ChiralLagrangianwithHeavyMesons . 55 6.1.Generalities . .55 6.2. B Deν And B D∗πEν ......................57 6.3.ViolationsToChiralSymmetry→ → . .58 6.4.ViolationsToHeavyQuarkSymmetry . 61 6.5.TroubleOnTheHorizon? . .66 References .................................68 1 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE THEORY OF HEAVY MESONS AND BARYONS BENJAMIN GRINSTEIN Department Of Physics, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0319, USA ABSTRACT Introductory lectures on heavy quarks and heavy quark effective field theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the Mass and the Quantum Numbers J of the X(3872)
    Measurement of the Mass and the Quantum Numbers J PC of the X(3872) State Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN von der Fakult¨at f¨ur Physik der Universit¨at Karlsruhe (TH) genehmigte DISSERTATION von Dipl.-Phys. Joachim Heuser aus Pforzheim Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 20.06.2008 Referent: Prof. Dr. M. Feindt, Institut f¨ur Experimentelle Kernphysik Korreferent: Prof. Dr. G. Quast, Institut f¨ur Experimentelle Kernphysik Contents 1 The X(3872) 1 1.1 HistoryoftheUnderstandingofMatter . .. 1 1.2 The Standard Model of Elementary Particle Physics . ..... 2 1.3 The Discovery of the X(3872)...................... 5 1.4 The X(3872):EarlyMeasurements . 6 1.5 The X(3872): PossibleInterpretations . 10 1.5.1 CharmoniumHypothesis . 10 1.5.2 MolecularHypothesis. 14 1.5.3 MultiquarkHypotheses. 16 1.5.4 AlternateHypotheses. 17 1.5.5 SummaryofHypotheses . 18 1.6 Recent Experimental Developments . 18 1.7 SummaryandOutline .......................... 23 2 The CDF II Experiment 25 2.1 TheTevatron ............................... 25 2.1.1 TheAcceleratorChain . 25 2.1.2 Luminosity ............................ 28 2.2 TheCDFIIDetector........................... 31 2.2.1 GeneralOverview. 31 2.2.2 TrackingSystem ......................... 31 2.2.3 MuonDetectionSystem . 35 2.2.4 OtherDetectorSystems . 37 2.2.5 TriggerSystem .......................... 39 iv Contents 3 Determination of the Quantum Numbers J PC 41 3.1 Decay Topology and Amplitude Construction . .. 41 3.1.1 Conservation Rules in the X(3872)Decay . 44 3.1.2 Construction of a Vertex Decay Matrix Element . 47 3.1.3 Construction of the Full Decay Matrix Element . 50 3.1.4 Matrix Element for the ψ(2S)Decay .............
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Charm of Vector Mesons: a Possible Solution of the “Pr Puzzle” *
    . ! SLAC-PUB-7463 TAUP 2417-97 hep-ph/9704379 April 1997 Intrinsic Charm of Vector Mesons: A Possible Solution of the “pr Puzzle” * Stanley J. Brodsky Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford, California 94309 e-mail: [email protected] and Marek Karliner School of Physics and Astronomy Raymond and Beverly Suckler Faculty of Exact Sciences Tel-Aviv University, 69978 Tel-Aviv, Israel e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT An outstanding mystery of charmonium physics is why the J/q decays prominent- ly to pseudoscalar plus vector meson channels, such as J/ll, -+ pr and J/G + K*K, whereas the @‘(as) d oes not. We show that such decays of J/$ and their suppres- sion for $+(2S) f o 11ow naturally from the existence of intrinsic charm 1ijq EC) Fock components of the light vector mesons. Submitted to Physical Review Letters. i - *Work supported-in part by tlie Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. I One of the basic tenets of quantum chromodynamics is that heavy quarkonium states such as the J/4, T/Y,and r must decay into light hadrons via the annihilation of the heavy quark constituents into gluons, as shown in Fig. l(a). This assumption is motivated by the OZI rule which postulates suppression of transitions between hadrons without valence quarks in common. A central feature of the PQCD analysis is the fact that the annihilation amplitude for quarkonium decay into gluons occurs at relatively short distances r N l/m~, thus allowing a perturbative expansion in a small QCD coupling a,( ms).
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleon Resonances in Kaon Photoproduction
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Nucleon Resonances in Kaon Photoproduction C. BENNHOLD1,T.MART1,2, A. WALUYO1, H. HABERZETTL1,G. PENNER3,T.FEUSTER3,U.MOSEL3 1 Center for Nuclear Studies, Department of Physics, The George Washington Uni- versity, Washington, D.C. 20052, U.S.A. 2 Jurusan Fisika, FMIPA, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia 3 Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, Universit¨at Giessen, D-35392 Giessen, Germany Abstract. Nucleon resonances are investigated through the electromagnetic pro- duction of K-mesons. We study the kaon photoproduction process at tree-level and compare to a recently developed unitary K-matrix approach. Employing hadronic form factors along with the proper gauge prescription yields suppression of the Born terms and leads a resonance dominated process for both KΛ and KΣ photoproduc- tion. Using new SAPHIR data we find the K+Λ photoproduction to be dominated by the S11(1650) at threshold, with additional contributions from the P11(1710) and P13(1720) states. The KΣ channel couples to a cluster of ∆ resonances around W = 1900 MeV. We briefly discuss some tantalizing evidence for a missing D13 resonance around 1900 MeV with a strong branching ratio into the KΛ channel. 1 Introduction Since its discovery five decades ago, the quark flavor strangeness has played a special role in nuclear physics and particle physics. More recently, the strange quark has found itself between two theoretical domains: on the one hand is the realm of chiral symmetry with the almost massless up and down quarks, while on the other side the physics can be described in terms of the heavy quark effective theory of the charm and bottom quarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleon Structure and Parity-Violating Electron Scattering DH Beck
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Physics Department Faculty Publication Series Physics 2001 Nucleon structure and parity-violating electron scattering DH Beck BR Holstein [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/physics_faculty_pubs Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Beck, DH and Holstein, BR, "Nucleon structure and parity-violating electron scattering" (2001). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS E-NUCLEAR PHYSICS. 308. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/physics_faculty_pubs/308 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Department Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. International Journal of Modern Physics E, cf World Scientific Publishing Company NUCLEON STRUCTURE AND PARITY-VIOLATING ELECTRON SCATTERING DOUGLAS H. BECK Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1110 West Green Street Urbana, Illinois 61801-3080, USA and BARRY R. HOLSTEIN Department of Physics-LGRT, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-4525, USA Received (received date) Revised (revised date) We review the area of strange quark contributions to nucleon structure. In particular, we focus on current models of strange quark vector currents in the nucleon and the associated parity-violating elastic electron scattering experiments from which vector and axial-vector currents are extracted. 1. Introduction A description of the structure of hadrons in terms of quarks and gluons is one of the challenging problems in modern physics. Whereas QCD is taken to be the correct microscopic basis for such a description, efforts to solve the theory directly have thus far been unsuccessful for all but the shortest distance scale regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiral Dynamics and the Low-Energy Kaon-Nucleon Interaction * N
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS A ELSEVIER Nuclear Physics A 594 (1995) 325-345 Chiral dynamics and the low-energy kaon-nucleon interaction * N. Kaiser, EB. Siegel 1, W. Weise Physik Department, Technische Universitiit Miinchen, lnstitut fiir Theoretische Physik, D-85747 Garching, Germany Received 6 May 1995; revised 3 August 1995 Abstract We examine the meson-baryon interaction in the strangeness S ffi -1 sector using an effective chiral Lagrangian. Potentials are derived from this Lagrangian and used in a coupled-channel calculation of the low-energy observables. The potentials are constructed such that in the Born approximation the s-wave scattering length is the same as that given by the effective chiral Lagrangian, up to order q2. A comparison is made with the available low-energy hadronic data of the coupled K-p, Ezr, A~r system, which includes the A(1405) resonance, K-p elastic and inelastic scattering, and the threshold branching ratios of the K-p decay. Good fits to the experimental data and estimates of previously unknown Lagrangian parameters are obtained. I. Introduction The effective chiral Lagrangian including baryons, which corresponds to an expansion in increasing powers of derivatives of the meson fields and quark masses, has been successful in understanding many properties of the meson-baryon system at low energies [ 1 ]. Since the pion mass is small, properties of the pion-nucleon system are well described close to threshold. Recently, the SU(3) chiral Lagrangian has also been applied to the K+N system [2,3]. In both the 7rN and K÷N cases, the low-energy (s-wave) interaction is relatively weak and the leading term of the Lagrangian (linear in the meson four-momentum q) is the main one.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Anomalies of Hadron Physics from TGD Perspective
    Three anomalies of hadron physics from TGD perspective M. Pitk¨anen Email: [email protected]. http://tgdtheory.com/. June 20, 2019 Abstract Three anomalies related to hadron physics will be discussed. The first anomaly relates to proton spin puzzle. The latest discovery is that there are more d type sea quarks than u type sea quarks in proton - this is difficult to understand in QCD picture. The contribution of d quarks to the spin of proton is however smaller than u type sea quarks. TGD suggests that the notion of sea quark should be replaced with quarks associated with the ends of color flux tubes connecting valence quarks to a triangle like structure. This allows to understand the anomaly and also why old Gell-Mann model works so well. Also the mass of proton can be deduced with high precision from p-adic mass calculation as will be found. Also the old Aleph anomaly has made a comeback. TGD explanation is in terms of scaled- up variants of b quark forming pion and ρ meson like bound states. One ends up with the identification of production mechanism for both 55 GeV pion-like state and pion and ρ meson like bound states with mass 28 and 30 GeV. The third anomaly is evidence for a new bump with 400 GeV at LHC assumed to be created by gluon-gluon fusion via top quark pair to parity odd state tentatively identified as pseudoscalar Higgs predicted by SUSY scenarios. The mass happens to exactly 512 times that of pseudovector meson ! and one can consider the identification as ρ meson of M89 hadron physics predicted by TGD encouraged also by the large 5 per cent decay width compared to decay with of order 10−5 for ordinary Higgs.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Resolution of the Enigmas of P-Wave Meson Spectroscopy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server LA-UR-97-717 Towards Resolution of the Enigmas of P -Wave Meson Spectroscopy L. Burakovsky∗ and T. Goldman† Theoretical Division, MS B285 Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA Abstract The mass spectrum of P -wave mesons is considered in a nonrelativistic constituent quark model. The results show the common mass degeneracy of the isovector and isodoublet states of the scalar and tensor meson nonets, and do not exclude the possibility of a similar degeneracy of the same states of the axial-vector and pseudovector nonets. Current experimental hadronic and τ- decay data suggest, however, a different scenario leading to the a1 meson mass o ' 1190 MeV and the K1A-K1B mixing angle ' (37 ± 3) . Possible ss¯ states of the four nonets are also discussed. Key words: quark model, potential model, P -wave mesons PACS: 12.39.Jh, 12.39.Pn, 12.40.Yx, 14.40.Cs 1 Introduction The existence of a gluon self-coupling in QCD suggests that, in addition to the conven- tional qq¯ states, there may be non-qq¯ mesons: bound states including gluons (gluonia and glueballs, and qqg¯ hybrids) and multiquark states [1]. Since the theoretical guid- ance on the properties of unusual states is often contradictory, models that agree in ∗E-mail: [email protected] †E-mail: [email protected] 1 the qq¯ sector differ in their predictions about new states. Among the naively expected signatures for gluonium are i) no place in qq¯ nonet, ii) flavor-singlet coupling, iii) enhanced production in gluon-rich channels such as J/Ψ(1S) decay, iv) reduced γγ coupling, v) exotic quantum numbers not allowed for qq¯ (in some cases).
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Interaction from Effective Field Theory
    Nuclear Interaction from Effective Field Theory Damon Binder A thesis submitted for the degree of Bachelor of Science (Advanced) with Honours in Physics, at The Australian National University October, 2016 ii Declaration This thesis is an account of research undertaken between February 2016 and October 2016 at The Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Except where acknowledged in the customary manner, the material presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge, original and has not been submitted in whole or part for a degree in any university. Damon J. Binder October, 2016 iii iv Acknowledgments First, I thank my supervisor C´edricSimenel, for his patience, guidance, and ability to catch numerous errors in my thesis. I must also thank him for introducing me to the wonderful topic of quantum field theory, and for putting up with the many tangents I found along the way. Thanks go to both my fellow Bruce residents and fellow honours students, for their companionship, ability to provide distraction, and for many meal-time conversations. In particular thanks go to Matthew Alger, who proofread my thesis and provided valuable advice throughout the year. I would also like to thank Abigail, for her constant support throughout the year. Finally, I thank my family, for raising me and for always valuing my education. v vi Abstract In order to predict the properties of atomic nuclei, a quantitative understanding of the in- medium inter-nucleon forces is required. The Skyrme energy density functional provides a popular phenomenological description of these interactions, with parameters fitted to experimental data.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(QFTHEP2011)075 Considered As Multipole Expansion Multiplied on Pqcd ) 2 Q ( a G ∗ [email protected] [email protected] Speaker
    Chiral symmetry and form factors of neutrino-nucleon interactions. PoS(QFTHEP2011)075 K.A. Kanshin∗ Institute of Physics, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don 344090, Russia E-mail: [email protected] G.M. Vereshkov Institute of Physics, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don 344090, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Phenomenological multigauge model of neutrino-nucleon interaction based on chiral symmetry of strong interactions and vector/pseudovector meson dominance model is suggested. It was shown that within the framework of the model the constant of neutron beta decay is formed by meson masses and parameters of the hadronization of fundamental vector bosons. Then, quasi elastic (anti)neutrino-nucleon scattering processes have been investigated and it was found that 2 weak nucleon form factor (FF) GA(Q ) considered as multipole expansion multiplied on pQCD asymptotes is in a good agreement with experimental data. The XXth International Workshop High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory September 24-October 1, 2011 Sochi Russia ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Chiral symmetry and form factors of neutrino-nucleon interactions. K.A. Kanshin 1. Introduction Neutrinos give the unique opportunity to probe axial structure of nucleons, that is why clear theoretical interpretation of experimental data on axial nucleon FFs is of great importance. More- over, precise knowledge of weak nucleon FFs is vital for present and future accelerator and atmo- spheric neutrino experiments. In this work we suggest phenomenological baryon-meson gauge theory of b-decay and charged current quasi elastic (CCQE) n − N scattering.
    [Show full text]